38 results on '"Cosio, Borja G."'
Search Results
2. International Variation in Severe Exacerbation Rates in Patients With Severe Asthma.
- Author
-
Lee TY, Price D, Yadav CP, Roy R, Lim LHM, Wang E, Wechsler ME, Jackson DJ, Busby J, Heaney LG, Pfeffer PE, Mahboub B, Perng Steve DW, Cosio BG, Perez-de-Llano L, Al-Lehebi R, Larenas-Linnemann D, Al-Ahmad M, Rhee CK, Iwanaga T, Heffler E, Canonica GW, Costello R, Papadopoulos NG, Papaioannou AI, Porsbjerg CM, Torres-Duque CA, Christoff GC, Popov TA, Hew M, Peters M, Gibson PG, Maspero J, Bergeron C, Cerda S, Contreras-Contreras EA, Chen W, and Sadatsafavi M
- Subjects
- Humans, Female, Male, Middle Aged, Adult, Hospitalization statistics & numerical data, Adrenal Cortex Hormones therapeutic use, Asthma drug therapy, Asthma epidemiology, Disease Progression, Severity of Illness Index, Registries
- Abstract
Background: Exacerbation frequency strongly influences treatment choices in patients with severe asthma., Research Question: What is the extent of the variability of exacerbation rate across countries and its implications in disease management?, Study Design and Methods: We retrieved data from the International Severe Asthma Registry, an international observational cohort of patients with a clinical diagnosis of severe asthma. We identified patients aged ≥ 18 years who did not initiate any biologics prior to baseline visit. A severe exacerbation was defined as the use of oral corticosteroids for ≥ 3 days or asthma-related hospitalization/ED visit. A series of negative binomial models were applied to estimate country-specific severe exacerbation rates during 365 days of follow-up, starting from a naive model with country as the only variable to an adjusted model with country as a random-effect term and patient and disease characteristics as independent variables., Results: The final sample included 7,510 patients from 17 countries (56% from the United States), contributing to 1,939 severe exacerbations (0.27/person-year). There was large between-country variation in observed severe exacerbation rate (minimum, 0.04 [Argentina]; maximum, 0.88 [Saudi Arabia]; interquartile range, 0.13-0.54), which remained substantial after adjusting for patient characteristics and sampling variability (interquartile range, 0.16-0.39)., Interpretation: Individuals with similar patient characteristics but coming from different jurisdictions have varied severe exacerbation risks, even after controlling for patient and disease characteristics. This suggests unknown patient factors or system-level variations at play. Disease management guidelines should recognize such between-country variability. Risk prediction models that are calibrated for each jurisdiction will be needed to optimize treatment strategies., Competing Interests: Financial/Nonfinancial Disclosures The authors have reported to CHEST the following: D. P. has advisory board membership with Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Circassia, Mylan, Mundipharma, Novartis, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi Genzyme, Teva Pharmaceuticals, and Thermofisher; has consultancy agreements with Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, Mylan, Mundipharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Teva Pharmaceuticals, and Theravance; has grants and unrestricted funding for investigator-initiated studies (conducted through Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute Pte Ltd) from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Circassia, Mylan, Mundipharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Respiratory Effectiveness Group, Sanofi Genzyme, Teva Pharmaceuticals, Theravance, and UK National Health Service; has received payment for lectures/speaking engagements from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Cipla, GlaxoSmithKline, Kyorin, Mylan, Mundipharma, Novartis, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi Genzyme, and Teva Pharmaceuticals; has received payment for the development of educational materials from Mundipharma and Novartis; has received payment for travel/accommodation/meeting expenses from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Mundipharma, Mylan, Novartis, and Thermofisher; has received funding for patient enrollment or completion of research from Novartis; has stock/stock options from AKL Research and Development Ltd, which produces phytopharmaceuticals; owns 74% of the social enterprise Optimum Patient Care Ltd (Australia and UK) and 74% of Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute Pte Ltd (Singapore); has 5% shareholding in Timestamp, which develops adherence monitoring technology; is a peer reviewer for grant committees of the Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation programme and Health Technology Assessment; and was an expert witness for GlaxoSmithKline. E. W. has received honoraria from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, and Genentech; and has been an investigator on studies sponsored by AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Genentech, Sanofi, Novartis, and Teva Pharmaceuticals, for which her institution has received funding. M. E. W. reports grants and/or personal fees from Novartis, Sanofi, Regeneron, Genentech, Sentien, Restorbio, Equillium, Genzyme, Cohero Health, Teva Pharmaceuticals, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Amgen, GlaxoSmithKline, Cytoreason, Cerecor, Sound biologic, Incyte, and Kinaset. D. J. J. has received speaker fees and consultancy fees from AZ, GSK, Sanofi Regeneron, and BI; and research funding from AstraZeneca. J. B. has received research grants from AstraZeneca and personnel fees from NuvoAir, outside the submitted work. L. G. H. has received grant funding, participated in advisory boards, and given lectures at meetings supported by Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Circassia, Hoffmann la Roche, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Theravance, Evelo Biosciences, Sanofi, and Teva Pharmaceuticals; has received grants from MedImmune, Novartis UK, Roche/Genentech Inc, Amgen, Genentech/Hoffman la Roche, AstraZeneca, MedImmune, Glaxo Smith Kline, Aerocrine, and Vitalograph; has received sponsorship for attending international scientific meetings from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, GSK, and Napp Pharmaceuticals; has taken part in asthma clinical trials sponsored by AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Hoffmann la Roche, and GlaxoSmithKline for which his institution received remuneration; and is the academic lead for the Medical Research Council Stratified Medicine UK Consortium in Severe Asthma, which involves industrial partnerships with a number of pharmaceutical companies including Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Hoffmann la Roche, and Janssen. P. E. P. has attended advisory boards for AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, and Sanofi; has given lectures at meetings supported by AstraZeneca and GlaxoSmithKline; has taken part in clinical trials sponsored by AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, and Sanofi, for which his institution received remuneration; and has a current research grant funded by GlaxoSmithKline. D.-W. P. received sponsorship to attend or speak at international meetings, honoraria for lecturing or attending advisory boards, and research grants from the following companies: AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Daiichi Sankyo, Shionogi, and Orient Pharma. B. G. C. declares grants from Chiesi and GlaxoSmithKline; personal fees for advisory board activities from Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Sanofi, Teva Pharmaceuticals, and AstraZeneca; and payment for lectures/speaking engagements from Chiesi, Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline, Menarini, and AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work. L. P.-L. reports grants, personal fees, and nonfinancial support from AstraZeneca, Teva Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi, and FAES; personal fees and nonfinancial support from GlaxoSmithKline and Chiesi; personal fees from MSD, TECHDOW PHARMA, and Leo-Pharma; grants and personal fees from GEBRO; and personal fees from GILEAD, outside the submitted work. R. A.-L. has given lectures at meetings supported by AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline, and Sanofi; and participated in advisory board fees from GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca, Novartis, and Abbot. D. L.-L. reports personal fees from ALK-Abelló, AstraZeneca national and global, Bayer, Chiesi, Grunenthal, Grin, GlaxoSmithKline national and global, Viatris, Menarini, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Siegfried, UCB, and Carnot; and grants from Abbvie, Bayer, Lilly, Sanofi, Astrazeneca, Pfizer, Novartis, Circassia, UCB, and GlaxoSmithKline, outside the submitted work. M. A.-A. has received advisory board and speaker fees from AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Novartis, and GlaxoSmithKline; and received a grant from Kuwait Foundation for the Advancement of Sciences (KFAS). C. K. R. received consulting/lecture fees from MSD, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Takeda, Mundipharma, Boehringer Ingelheim, Teva Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi, and Bayer. T. I. received lecture fees from Kyorin, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, and AstraZeneca. E. H. declares personal fees from Sanofi, Regeneron, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Stallergenes, and Circassia. G. W. C. has received research grants and lecture or advisory board fees from A. Menarini, Alk-Albello, Allergy Therapeutics, Anallergo, AstraZeneca, MedImmune, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi Farmaceutici, Circassia, Danone, Faes, Genentech, Guidotti Malesci, GlaxoSmithKline, Hal Allergy, Merck, MSD, Mundipharma, Novartis, Orion, Sanofi Aventis, Sanofi, Genzyme/Regeneron, Stallergenes, UCB Pharma, Uriach Pharma, Teva Pharmaceuticals, Thermo Fisher, and Valeas. R. C. has received honoraria for lectures from Aerogen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, and Teva Pharmaceuticals; is a member of advisory boards for GlaxoSmithKline and Novartis; has received grant support from GlaxoSmithKline and Aerogen; and has patents in the use of acoustics in the diagnosis of lung disease, assessment of adherence, and prediction of exacerbations. N. G. P. has been a speaker and/or advisory board member for Abbott, Abbvie, ALK, Asit Biotech, AstraZeneca, Biomay, Boehringer Ingelheim, GSK, HAL, Faes Farma, Medscape, Menarini, MSD, Novartis, Nutricia, OM Pharma, Regeneron, Sanofi, Takeda, and Viatris. A. I. P. has received fees and honoraria from Menarini, GSK, Novartis, Elpen, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, and Chiesi. C. M. P. has attended advisory boards for AstraZeneca, Novartis, Teva Pharmaceuticals, and Sanofi-Genzyme; has given lectures at meetings supported by AstraZeneca, Novartis, Teva Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi-Genzyme, and GlaxoSmithKline; has taken part in clinical trials sponsored by AstraZeneca, Novartis, MSD, Sanofi-Genzyme, GlaxoSmithKline, and Novartis; and has received educational and research grants from AstraZeneca, Novartis, Teva Pharmaceuticals, GlaxoSmithKline, ALK, and Sanofi-Genzyme. C. A. T.-D. has received fees as advisory board participant and/or speaker from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, and Sanofi-Aventis; has taken part in clinical trials from AstraZeneca, Novartis, and Sanofi-Aventis; and has received unrestricted grants for investigator-initiated studies at Fundacion Neumologica Colombiana from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Grifols, and Novartis. T. A. P. declares relevant research support from Novartis and Chiesi Pharma. M. H. declares grants and other advisory board fees (made to his institutional employer) from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Sanofi, Teva Pharmaceuticals, and Seqirus, for unrelated projects. M. P. declares personal fees and nonfinancial support from AstraZeneca and GlaxoSmithKline. P. G. G. has received speaker fees and grants to his institution from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, and Novartis. J. M. reports speaker fees, grants, or advisory boards for AstraZeneca, Sanofi, GSK, Novartis, Inmunotek, Menarini, and Noucor. C. B. reports advisory boards participation for Sanofi, AstraZeneca, Takeda, and ValeoPharma; honorarium for presentations for GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca, Amgen, Grifols, Sanofi, Regeneron, and ValeoPharma; and clinical trials paid to University of British Columbia sponsored by AstraZeneza, GlaxoSmithKline, BioHaven, and Sanofi. S. C. declares receiving conference fees from Novartis S.A de C.V, Glaxosmithkline Mexico, AstraZeneca Mexico, and Sanofi Mexico. M. S. has received honoraria from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Teva Pharmaceuticals, and GlaxoSmithKline for purposes unrelated to the content of this manuscript; and has received research funding from AstraZeneza and Boehringer Ingelheim directly into his research account from AstraZeneza for unrelated projects. None declared (T. Y. L., C. P. Y., R. R., L. H. M. L., B. M., G. C. C., E. A. C.-C., W. C.)., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Impact of pre-biologic impairment on meeting domain-specific biologic responder definitions in patients with severe asthma.
- Author
-
Perez-de-Llano L, Scelo G, Canonica GW, Chen W, Henley W, Larenas-Linnemann D, Peters MJ, Pfeffer PE, Tran TN, Ulrik CS, Popov TA, Sadatsafavi M, Hew M, Máspero J, Gibson PG, Christoff GC, Fitzgerald JM, Torres-Duque CA, Porsbjerg CM, Papadopoulos NG, Papaioannou AI, Heffler E, Iwanaga T, Al-Ahmad M, Kuna P, Fonseca JA, Al-Lehebi R, Rhee CK, Koh MS, Cosio BG, Perng Steve DW, Mahboub B, Menzies-Gow AN, Jackson DJ, Busby J, Heaney LG, Patel PH, Wang E, Wechsler ME, Altraja A, Lehtimäki L, Bourdin A, Bjermer L, Bulathsinhala L, Carter V, Murray R, Beastall A, Denton E, and Price DB
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Female, Middle Aged, Adult, Longitudinal Studies, Treatment Outcome, Severity of Illness Index, Adrenal Cortex Hormones therapeutic use, Registries, Aged, Asthma drug therapy, Anti-Asthmatic Agents therapeutic use
- Abstract
Background: There is little agreement on clinically useful criteria for identifying real-world responders to biologic treatments for asthma., Objective: To investigate the impact of pre-biologic impairment on meeting domain-specific biologic responder definitions in adults with severe asthma., Methods: This was a longitudinal, cohort study across 22 countries participating in the International Severe Asthma Registry (https://isaregistries.org/) between May 2017 and January 2023. Change in 4 asthma domains (exacerbation rate, asthma control, long-term oral corticosteroid [LTOCS] dose, and lung function) was assessed from biologic initiation to 1 year post-treatment (minimum 24 weeks). Pre- to post-biologic changes for responders and nonresponders were described along a categorical gradient for each domain derived from pre-biologic distributions (exacerbation rate: 0 to 6+/y; asthma control: well controlled to uncontrolled; LTOCS: 0 to >30 mg/d; percent-predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second [ppFEV
1 ]: <50% to ≥80%)., Results: Percentage of biologic responders (ie, those with a category improvement pre- to post-biologic) varied by domain and increased with greater pre-biologic impairment, increasing from 70.2% to 90.0% for exacerbation rate, 46.3% to 52.3% for asthma control, 31.1% to 58.5% for LTOCS daily dose, and 35.8% to 50.6% for ppFEV1 . The proportion of patients having improvement post-biologic tended to be greater for anti-IL-5/5R compared with for anti-IgE for exacerbation, asthma control, and ppFEV1 domains, irrespective of pre-biologic impairment., Conclusion: Our results provide realistic outcome-specific post-biologic expectations for both physicians and patients, will be foundational to inform future work on a multidimensional approach to define and assess biologic responders and response, and may enhance appropriate patient selection for biologic therapies., Trial Registration: The ISAR database has ethical approval from the Anonymous Data Ethics Protocols and Transparency (ADEPT) committee (ADEPT0218) and is registered with the European Union Electronic Register of Post-Authorization studies (ENCEPP/DSPP/23720). The study was designed, implemented, and reported in compliance with the European Network Centres for Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacovigilance (ENCEPP) Code of Conduct (EUPAS38288) and with all applicable local and international laws and regulation, and registered with ENCEPP (https://www.encepp.eu/encepp/viewResource.htm?id=38289). Governance was provided by ADEPT (registration number: ADEPT1220)., Competing Interests: Disclosures Dr Perez-de-Llano reports grants, personal fees and non-financial support from AstraZeneca, personal fees and non-financial support from GlaxoSmithKline, grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Teva, personal fees and non-financial support from Chiesi, grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Sanofi, personal fees from MSD, personal fees from Techdow Pharma, grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Faes Farma, personal fees from Leo-Pharma, grants and personal fees from Gebro, personal fees from Gilead, outside the submitted work. Dr Scelo is a consultant for Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute (OPRI). OPRI conducted this study in collaboration with Optimum Patient Care and AstraZeneca. Dr Canonica has received research grants and lecture or advisory board fees from Menarini, Alk-Albello, Allergy Therapeutics, Anallergo, AstraZeneca, MedImmune, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi Farmaceutici, Circassia, Danone, Faes, Genentech, Guidotti Malesci, GlaxoSmithKline, Hal Allergy, Merck, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Mundipharma, Novartis, Orion, Sanofi Aventis, Sanofi, Genzyme/Regeneron, Stallergenes, UCB Pharma, Uriach Pharma, Teva, Thermo Fisher, and Valeas. Dr Henley is affiliated with OPRI and reports receiving travel support from Eisai Limited. Dr Larenas-Linnemann reports receiving personal fees from ALK-Abelló, AstraZeneca national and global, Bayer, Chiesi, Grunenthal, Grin, GlaxoSmithKline national and global, Viatris, Menarini, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Siegfried, UCB, Carnot, grants from AbbVie, Bayer, Lilly, Sanofi, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Novartis, Circassia, UCB, and GlaxoSmithKline, outside the submitted work. Dr Peters declares receiving personal fees and nonfinancial support from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, and Sanofi. Dr Pfeffer has attended advisory boards for AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, and Sanofi; has given lectures at meetings supported by AstraZeneca and GlaxoSmithKline; has taken part in clinical trials sponsored by AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, and Sanofi, for which his institution received remuneration; and has a current research grant funded by GlaxoSmithKline. Dr Tran is an employee of AstraZeneca and may own stock or stock options in AstraZeneca. Dr Suppli Ulrik reports receiving personal fees for talks and having participation in advisory boards and others from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, TEVA, Boehringer Ingelheim, Orion Pharma, Sanofi Genzyme, TFF Pharmaceuticals, Covis Pharma, Berlin-Chemie, Takeda, Chiesi, and Pfizer, outside the submitted work. Dr Popov declares relevant research support from Novartis and Chiesi Pharma. Dr Sadatsafavi has received honoraria from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, TEVA, and GlaxoSmithKline for purposes unrelated to the content of this manuscript and has received research funding from AstraZeneca and Boehringer Ingelheim directly into his research account from AstraZeneca for unrelated projects. Dr Hew declares receiving grants and other advisory board fees (made to his institutional employer) from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Sanofi, Teva, and Seqirus, for unrelated projects. Dr Maspero reports receiving speaker fees and grants or serving on the advisory boards for AstraZeneca, Sanofi, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Inmunotek, Menarini, and Noucor. Dr Gibson has received speaker fees and grants to his institution from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, and Novartis. Dr FitzGerald previously declared receiving grants from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi Regeneron, and Novartis paid directly to UBC and receiving personal fees for lectures and attending advisory boards for AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi Regeneron, and TEVA. Dr Torres-Duque has received fees as advisory board participant and/or speaker from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, and Sanofi-Aventis; has taken part in clinical trials from AstraZeneca, Novartis, and Sanofi-Aventis; and has received unrestricted grants for investigator-initiated studies at Fundacion Neumologica Colombiana from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Grifols, and Novartis. Dr Porsbjerg has attended advisory boards for AstraZeneca, Novartis, TEVA, and Sanofi-Genzyme; has given lectures at meetings supported by AstraZeneca, Novartis, TEVA, Sanofi-Genzyme, and GlaxoSmithKline; has taken part in clinical trials sponsored by AstraZeneca, Novartis, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Sanofi-Genzyme, GlaxoSmithKline, and Novartis; and has received educational and research grants from AstraZeneca, Novartis, TEVA, GlaxoSmithKline, ALK, and Sanofi-Genzyme. Dr Papadopoulos has been a speaker and/or advisory board member for Abbott, AbbVie, ALK, Asit Biotech, AstraZeneca, Biomay, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, HAL, Faes Farma, Medscape, Menarini, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Nutricia, OM Pharma, Regeneron, Sanofi, Takeda, and Viatris. Dr Papaioannou has received fees and honoraria from Menarini, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Elpen, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, and Chiesi. Dr Heffler declares receiving personal fees from Sanofi, Regeneron, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Stallergenes, and Circassia. Dr Iwanaga received lecture fees from Kyorin, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, and AstraZeneca. Dr Al-Ahmad has received advisory board and speaker fees from AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Novartis, and GlaxoSmithKline and received a grant from Kuwait Foundation for the Advancement of Sciences. Dr Kuna reports receiving personal fees from Adamed, AstraZeneca, Berlin Chemie Menarini, FAES, Glenmark, Novartis, Polpharma, Boehringer Ingelheim, Teva, and Zentiva, outside the submitted work. Dr Fonseca reports receiving grants from research agreements with AstraZeneca, Mundipharma, Sanofi Regeneron, and Novartis and personal fees for lectures and attending advisory boards for AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Mundipharma, Novartis, Sanofi Regeneron, and TEVA. Dr Al-Lehebi has given lectures at meetings supported by AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline, and Sanofi and participated in advisory board fees from GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca, Novartis, and Abbott. Dr Rhee received consulting/lecture fees from Merck Sharp & Dohme, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Takeda, Mundipharma, Boehringer Ingelheim, Teva, Sanofi, and Bayer. Dr Koh reports receiving grant support from AstraZeneca and honoraria for lectures and advisory board meetings paid to her hospital (Singapore General Hospital) from GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Sanofi, and Boehringer Ingelheim, outside the submitted work. Dr Cosio declares receiving grants from Chiesi and GlaxoSmithKline; personal fees for advisory board activities from Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Sanofi, Teva, and AstraZeneca; and payment for lectures/speaking engagements from Chiesi, Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline, Menarini, and AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work. Dr Perng (Steve) has received sponsorship to attend or speak at international meetings, honoraria for lecturing or attending advisory boards, and research grants from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Daiichi Sankyo, Shionogi, and Orient Pharma. Dr Menzies-Gow is an employee of AstraZeneca and may own stock or stock options in AstraZeneca. Dr Jackson has received speaker fees and consultancy fees from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi Regeneron, and Boehringer Ingelheim and research funding from AstraZeneca. Dr Busby has received research grants from AstraZeneca and personnel fees from NuvoAir, outside the submitted work. Dr Heaney has received grant funding, participated in advisory boards, and given lectures at meetings supported by Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Circassia, Hoffmann-La Roche, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Theravance, Evelo Biosciences, Sanofi, and Teva; has received grants from MedImmune, Novartis United Kingdom, Roche/Genentech Inc, GlaxoSmithKline, Amgen, Genentech/Hoffman-La Roche, AstraZeneca, MedImmune, Aerocrine, and Vitalograph; has received sponsorship for attending international scientific meetings from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, and Napp Pharmaceuticals; has taken part in asthma clinical trials sponsored by AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Hoffmann-La Roche, and GlaxoSmithKline for which his institution received remuneration; and is the Academic Lead for the Medical Research Council Stratified Medicine United Kingdom Consortium in Severe Asthma which involves industrial partnerships with a number of pharmaceutical companies including Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Hoffmann-La Roche, and Janssen. Dr Patel has received advisory board and speaker fees from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, and Sanofi/Regeneron. Dr Wang has received honoraria from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, and Genentech; has been an investigator on studies sponsored by AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Genentech, Sanofi, Novartis, and Teva, for which her institution has received funding. Dr Wechsler reports receiving grants and/or personal fees from Novartis, Sanofi, Regeneron, Genentech, Sentien, Restorbio, Equillium, Genzyme, Cohero Health, Teva, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Amgen, GlaxoSmithKline, Cytoreason, Cerecor, Sound Biologics, Incyte, and Kinaset. Dr Altraja has received lecture fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Berlin-Chemie Menarini, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Norameda, Novartis, Orion, Sanofi, and Zentiva; has sponsorships from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Berlin-Chemie Menarini, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Norameda, Novartis, and Sanofi; and has participated in advisory boards for AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Sanofi, and Teva. Dr Lehtimäki has received personal fees from ALK, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, Menarini, Novartis, Orion Pharma, and Sanofi. Dr Bourdin has received industry-sponsored grants from AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cephalon/Teva, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, and Sanofi-Regeneron and conducted consultancies with AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Regeneron-Sanofi, Med-in-Cell, Actelion, Merck, Roche, and Chiesi. Dr Bjermer has (in the last 3 years) received lecture or advisory board fees from Alk-Abello, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, Mundipharma, Novartis, Sanofi, Genzyme/Regeneron, and Teva. Ms Bulathsinhala is an employee of the OPRI. OPRI conducted this study in collaboration with Optimum Patient Care and AstraZeneca. Ms Carter is an employee of Optimum Patient Care, which is a co-funder of the International Severe Asthma Registry. Dr Murray is a consultant for OPRI. OPRI conducted this study in collaboration with Optimum Patient Care and AstraZeneca. Mr Beastall is an employee of the Optimum Patient Care Global, a co-funder of the International Severe Asthma Registry. Dr Denton declares receiving grants to her institution from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Sanofi, Teva, and Seqirus, for unrelated projects and speaker fees from Sanofi. Dr Price has advisory board membership with AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Viatris, and Teva Pharmaceuticals; consultancy agreements with AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Viatris, and Teva Pharmaceuticals; grants and unrestricted funding for investigator-initiated studies (conducted through OPRI Pte Ltd) from AstraZeneca, Chiesi, Viatris, Novartis, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi Genzyme, and United Kingdom National Health Service; payment for lectures/speaking engagements from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Cipla, Commune Digital, GlaxoSmithKline, Medscape, Viatris, Novartis, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals and Sanofi Genzyme, and Teva Pharmaceuticals; payment for travel/accommodation/meeting expenses from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Medscape, and Teva Pharmaceuticals; stock/stock options from AKL Research and Development Ltd which produces phytopharmaceuticals; owns 74% of the social enterprise Optimum Patient Care Ltd (Australia and United Kingdom) and 92.61% of OPRI Pte Ltd (Singapore); 5% shareholding in Timestamp which develops adherence monitoring technology; is peer reviewer for grant committees of the United Kingdom Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation Programme and Health Technology Assessment; and was an expert witness for GlaxoSmithKline. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to report., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Association between pre-biologic T2-biomarker combinations and response to biologics in patients with severe asthma.
- Author
-
Porsbjerg CM, Townend J, Bergeron C, Christoff GC, Katsoulotos GP, Larenas-Linnemann D, Tran TN, Al-Lehebi R, Bosnic-Anticevich SZ, Busby J, Hew M, Kostikas K, Papadopoulos NG, Pfeffer PE, Popov TA, Rhee CK, Sadatsafavi M, Tsai MJ, Ulrik CS, Al-Ahmad M, Altraja A, Beastall A, Bulathsinhala L, Carter V, Cosio BG, Fletton K, Hansen S, Heaney LG, Hubbard RB, Kuna P, Murray RB, Nagano T, Pini L, Cano Rosales DJ, Schleich F, Wechsler ME, Amaral R, Bourdin A, Brusselle GG, Chen W, Chung LP, Denton E, Fonseca JA, Hoyte F, Jackson DJ, Katial R, Kirenga BJ, Koh MS, Ławkiedraj A, Lehtimäki L, Liew MF, Mahboub B, Martin N, Menzies-Gow AN, Pang PH, Papaioannou AI, Patel PH, Perez-De-Llano L, Peters MJ, Ricciardi L, Rodríguez-Cáceres B, Solarte I, Tay TR, Torres-Duque CA, Wang E, Zappa M, Abisheganaden J, Assing KD, Costello RW, Gibson PG, Heffler E, Máspero J, Nicola S, Perng Steve DW, Puggioni F, Salvi S, Sheu CC, Sirena C, Taillé C, Tan TL, Bjermer L, Canonica GW, Iwanaga T, Jiménez-Maldonado L, Taube C, Brussino L, and Price DB
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Female, Middle Aged, Adult, Anti-Asthmatic Agents therapeutic use, Treatment Outcome, Registries, Severity of Illness Index, Leukocyte Count, Nitric Oxide metabolism, Aged, Cohort Studies, Asthma drug therapy, Asthma diagnosis, Asthma immunology, Biomarkers, Immunoglobulin E blood, Immunoglobulin E immunology, Eosinophils immunology, Biological Products therapeutic use
- Abstract
Background: To date, studies investigating the association between pre-biologic biomarker levels and post-biologic outcomes have been limited to single biomarkers and assessment of biologic efficacy from structured clinical trials., Aim: To elucidate the associations of pre-biologic individual biomarker levels or their combinations with pre-to-post biologic changes in asthma outcomes in real-life., Methods: This was a registry-based, cohort study using data from 23 countries, which shared data with the International Severe Asthma Registry (May 2017-February 2023). The investigated biomarkers (highest pre-biologic levels) were immunoglobulin E (IgE), blood eosinophil count (BEC) and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO). Pre- to approximately 12-month post-biologic change for each of three asthma outcome domains (i.e. exacerbation rate, symptom control and lung function), and the association of this change with pre-biologic biomarkers was investigated for individual and combined biomarkers., Results: Overall, 3751 patients initiated biologics and were included in the analysis. No association was found between pre-biologic BEC and pre-to-post biologic change in exacerbation rate for any biologic class. However, higher pre-biologic BEC and FeNO were both associated with greater post-biologic improvement in FEV
1 for both anti-IgE and anti-IL5/5R, with a trend for anti-IL4Rα. Mean FEV1 improved by 27-178 mL post-anti-IgE as pre-biologic BEC increased (250 to 1000 cells/µL), and by 43-216 mL and 129-250 mL post-anti-IL5/5R and -anti-IL4Rα, respectively along the same BEC gradient. Corresponding improvements along a FeNO gradient (25-100 ppb) were 41-274 mL, 69-207 mL and 148-224 mL for anti-IgE, anti-IL5/5R, and anti-IL4Rα, respectively. Higher baseline BEC was also associated with lower probability of uncontrolled asthma (OR 0.392; p=0.001) post-biologic for anti-IL5/5R. Pre-biologic IgE was a poor predictor of subsequent pre-to-post-biologic change for all outcomes assessed for all biologics. The combination of BEC + FeNO marginally improved the prediction of post-biologic FEV1 increase (adjusted R2 : 0.751), compared to BEC (adjusted R2 : 0.747) or FeNO alone (adjusted R2 : 0.743) (p=0.005 and <0.001, respectively); however, this prediction was not improved by the addition of IgE., Conclusions: The ability of higher baseline BEC, FeNO and their combination to predict biologic-associated lung function improvement may encourage earlier intervention in patients with impaired lung function or at risk of accelerated lung function decline., Competing Interests: CP has attended advisory boards for AstraZeneca, Novartis, TEVA, and Sanofi-Genzyme; has given lectures at meetings supported by AstraZeneca, Novartis, TEVA, Sanofi-Genzyme, and GlaxoSmithKline; has taken part in clinical trials sponsored by AstraZeneca, Novartis, MSD, Sanofi-Genzyme, GlaxoSmithKline, and Novartis; and has received educational and research grants from AstraZeneca, Novartis, TEVA, GlaxoSmithKline, ALK, and Sanofi-Genzyme. JT is an employee of the Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute OPRI. OPRI conducted this study in collaboration with Optimum Patient Care and AstraZeneca. CB reports advisory board participation of Sanofi-Regeneron, AstraZeneca, Takeda, ValeoPharma, honorarium for presentations for AstraZeneca/Amgen, GlaxoSmithKline, Grifols, Sanofi-Regeneron, ValeoPharma and grants paid to UBC from BioHaven, Sanofi-Regeneron, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline. GCC declares relevant research support from AstraZeneca and Sanofi. GK has attended advisory boards for AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline and Chiesi. He has also given lectures at meetings supported by Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, and Boehringer-Ingelheim. DL reports personal fees from ALK-Abelló, AstraZeneca national and global, Bayer, Chiesi, Grunenthal, Grin, GlaxoSmithKline national and global, Viatris, Menarini, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Siegfried, UCB, Carnot, grants from Abbvie, Bayer, Lilly, Sanofi, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Novartis, Circassia, UCB, GlaxoSmithKline, outside the submitted work. TNT is an employee of AstraZeneca and may own stock or stock options in AstraZeneca. AstraZeneca is a co-funder of ISAR. RA-L has given lectures at meetings supported by AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline, and Sanofi, and participated in advisory board fees from GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca, Novartis, and Abbott. SB-A has received honorarium for participation in expert advisory boards and given lectures for Teva Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Meda, Mundipharma, Sanofi, Mylan and received unrestricted research grants from Mylan, AstraZeneca, Teva, Mundipharma International, GlaxoSmithKline, and Viatris. JB has received research grants from AstraZeneca and personnel fees from NuvoAir, outside the submitted work. MH declares grants and other advisory board fees made to his institutional employer from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Sanofi, Teva, and Seqirus, for unrelated projects. KK received honoraria for presentations and consultancy fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, CSL Behring, Chiesi, ELPEN, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Menarini, Novartis, Sanofi, Specialty Therapeutics, WebMD. His department has received funding and grants from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Innovis, ELPEN, GlaxoSmithKline, Menarini, Novartis and NuvoAir. NP has been a speaker and/or advisory board member for Abbott, Abbvie, ALK, Asit Biotech, AstraZeneca, Biomay, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, HAL, Faes Farma, Medscape, Menarini, MSD, Novartis, Nutricia, OM Pharma, Regeneron, Sanofi, Takeda, and Viatris. PEP has attended advisory boards for AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, and Sanofi; has given lectures/webinars at meetings supported by AstraZeneca, Chiesi and GlaxoSmithKline; has taken part in clinical trials sponsored by AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Regeneron, and Sanofi, for which his institution received remuneration; and has a current research grant funded by GlaxoSmithKline. TP declares relevant research support from Novartis and Chiesi Pharma. CR received consulting/lecture fees from MSD, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Takeda, Mundipharma, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Teva, Sanofi, and Bayer. MS has received honoraria from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Teva, and GlaxoSmithKline for purposes unrelated to the content of this manuscript and has received research funding from AstraZeneca and Boehringer Ingelheim directly into his research account from AstraZeneca for unrelated projects. M-JT has received sponsorship to attend or speak at conferences, honoraria for lecturing or attending advisory boards, and research grants from the following companies: AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Pfizer, Shionogi and Orient EuroPharma. CU reports personal fees for talks, participation in advisory boards etc. from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Teva, Boehringer Ingelheim, Orion Pharma, Sanofi Genzyme, TFF Pharmaceuticals, Covis Pharma, Berlin-Chemie, Takeda, Chiesi, and Pfizer, outside the submitted work. MA-A has received advisory board and speaker fees from AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Novartis, and GlaxoSmithKline and received a grant from Kuwait Foundation for the Advancement of Sciences KFAS. AA has received lecture fees from AstraZeneca, Berlin-Chemie Menarini, Boehringer Ingelheim, CSL Behring, GlaxoSmithKline, MSD, Norameda, Novartis, Orion, Sanofi, and Zentiva; sponsorships from AstraZeneca, Berlin-Chemie Menarini, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, MSD, Norameda, Novartis, and Sanofi; and has participated in advisory boards for AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, CSL Behring, GlaxoSmithKline, MSD, Novartis, Sanofi, and Teva. ABe is an employee of Optimum Patient Care Global, a co-funder of the International Severe Asthma Registry. LBu is an employee of the Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute OPRI. OPRI conducted this study in collaboration with Optimum Patient Care and AstraZeneca. VC is an employee of Optimum Patient Care OPC. OPC is a co-funder of the International Severe Asthma Registry. BC declares grants from Chiesi and GlaxoSmithKline; personal fees for advisory board activities from Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Sanofi, Teva, and AstraZeneca; and payment for lectures/speaking engagements from Chiesi, Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline, Menarini, and AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work. KF is an employee of Optimum Patient Care Global OPCG, a co-funder of the International Severe Asthma Registry. LH has received grant funding, participated in advisory boards and given lectures at meetings supported by Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Circassia, Hoffmann la Roche, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Theravance, Evelo Biosciences, Sanofi, and Teva; he has received grants from MedImmune, Novartis UK, Roche/Genentech Inc, and GlaxoSmithKline, Amgen, Genentech/Hoffman la Roche, AstraZeneca, MedImmune, GlaxoSmithKline, Aerocrine, and Vitalograph; he has received sponsorship for attending international scientific meetings from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, and Napp Pharmaceuticals; he has also taken part in asthma clinical trials sponsored by AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Hoffmann la Roche, and GlaxoSmithKline for which his institution received remuneration; he is the Academic Lead for the Medical Research Council Stratified Medicine UK Consortium in Severe Asthma which involves industrial partnerships with a number of pharmaceutical companies including Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Hoffmann la Roche, and Janssen. RH is an employee for Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute OPRI which conducted this study in collaboration with Optimum Patient Care and AstraZeneca. PK reports personal fees from Adamed, AstraZeneca, Berlin Chemie Menarini, FAES, Glenmark, Novartis, Polpharma, Boehringer Ingelheim, Teva, Zentiva, outside the submitted work. RM is a consultant for Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute OPRI which conducted this study in collaboration with Optimum Patient Care and AstraZeneca. TN received lecture fees from Kyorin, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Sanofi, and AstraZeneca. LP received research grants and lecture fees from GlaxoSmithKline, Menarini, Chiesi, AstraZeneca and Grifols. DC has received speaker fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, and has acted as an investigator for trials sponsored by AstraZeneca. FS reports consultancy work for GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca, Sanofi - Advisory board, received speaker fees from GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca, Chiesi, Amgen, Teva and research grants from GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca, and Chiesi. MW reports grants and/or personal fees from Novartis, Sanofi, Regeneron, Genentech, Sentien, Restorbio, Equillium, Genzyme, Cohero Health, Teva, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Amgen, GlaxoSmithKline, Cytoreason, Cerecor, Sound Biologics, Incyte, and Kinaset. ABo has received industry-sponsored grants from AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Cephalon/Teva, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Sanofi-Regeneron, and consultancies with AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Boehringer-Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Regeneron-Sanofi, Med-in-Cell, Actelion, Merck, Roche, and Chiesi. GB has received honoraria for lectures from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, and Novartis. He is a member of advisory boards for AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, MSD Merck sharp & Dohme, Novartis, and Sanofi/Regeneron. LC has received speaker and consultancy fees and conference expenses from AstraZeneca, Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline, Boehringer Ingelheim and Menarini. ED declares grants to her institution from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Sanofi, Teva, and Seqirus, for unrelated projects and speaker fees from Sanofi. JF reports grants from research agreements with AstraZeneca, Mundipharma, Sanofi Regeneron, and Novartis. Personal fees for lectures and attending advisory boards: AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Mundipharma, Novartis, Sanofi Regeneron, and Teva. FH declares honoraria from AstraZeneca, Sanofi, TEVA, GSK, and Genentech. She has been an investigator on clinical trials sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline, Genentech, and Sanofi, for which her institution has received funding. DJ has received speaker fees and consultancy fees from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi Regeneron, Boehringer Ingelheim and research funding from AstraZeneca. MK reports grant support from AstraZeneca, and honoraria for lectures and advisory board meetings paid to her hospital Singapore General Hospital from GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Sanofi and Boehringer Ingelheim, outside the submitted work. LL has received personal fees from ALK, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, Menarini, Novartis, Orion Pharma and Sanofi. NM is an employee of AstraZeneca and may own stock or stock options in AstraZeneca. AstraZeneca is a co-funder of ISAR. AM-G is an employee of AstraZeneca and may own stock or stock options in AstraZeneca. AstraZeneca is a co-funder of ISAR. PHwP has received honoraria for talks and advisory board meetings from GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca, and Sanofi. AP has received fees and honoraria from Menarini, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Elpen, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, and Chiesi. PHP has received advisory board and speaker fees from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, and Sanofi/Regeneron. LP-d-L reports grants, personal fees and non-financial support from AstraZeneca, personal fees and non-financial support from GlaxoSmithKline, grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Teva, personal fees and non-financial support from Chiesi, grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Sanofi, personal fees from MSD, personal fees from Techdow Pharma, grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Faes Farma, personal fees from Leo-Pharma, grants and personal fees from Gebro, personal fees from Gilead, outside the submitted work. MP declares personal fees and non-financial support from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, and Sanofi. LR received fees as a speaker from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, and Sanofi. IS has received fees as advisory board participant and/or speaker from GlaxoSmithKline and Sanofi. CT-D has received fees as advisory board participant and/or speaker from AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, and Sanofi-Aventis; has taken part in clinical trials from AstraZeneca, Novartis, and Sanofi-Aventis; has received unrestricted grants for investigator-initiated studies at Fundacion Neumologica Colombiana from AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Grifols and Novartis. EW has received honoraria from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, and Genentech. She has been an investigator on studies sponsored by AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Genentech, Sanofi, Novartis, and Teva, for which her institution has received funding. RC has received honoraria for lectures from Aerogen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, and Teva. He is a member of advisory boards for GlaxoSmithKline and Novartis, has received grant support from GlaxoSmithKline and Aerogen and has patents in the use of acoustics in the diagnosis of lung disease, assessment of adherence and prediction of exacerbations. PG has received speaker fees and grants to his institution from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, and Novartis. EH declares personal fees for advisory boards participation and/or speaker activities from: Sanofi, Regeneron, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Stallergenes-Greer, Circassia, Bosch, Celltrion-Healthcare, Chiesi, and Almirall. JM reports speaker fees, grants or advisory boards for AstraZeneca, Sanofi, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Inmunotek, Menarini and Noucor. D-WP received sponsorship to attend or speak at international meetings, honoraria for lecturing or attending advisory boards, and research grants from the following companies: AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Daiichi Sankyo, Shionogi, and Orient Pharma. FP reports having received lectures or advisory board fees from: Menarini, Mundipharma, Chiesi, Alk Abello, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Guidotti, Malesci, GlaxoSmithKline, Hal Allergy, Novartis, Sanofi, Regeneron, Stallergenes Greer, Valeas, and Almirall. SS declares research support and speaker fees from Cipla, Glenmark, and GlaxoSmithKline. C-CS has received speaker fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, and Pfizer, and has acted as an investigator for trials sponsored by AstraZeneca, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Regeneron, Galapagos, Shionogi, Aridis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Insmed, United Therapeutics, Enanta Pharmaceuticals, Areteia Therapeutics, Meiji, and Horizon Therapeutics. CT has received lecture or advisory board fees and grants to her institution from AstraZeneca, Sanofi, GlaxoSmithKline, Chiesi and Novartis, for unrelated projects. TT is an advisory Board Member for Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Takeda, GlaxoSmithKline, MSD, Mundipharma, and Janssen. Honoraria were received for these advisory boards. Honoraria were received for speaking at CMEs for AstraZeneca in the past. Conference sponsorships from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck Serono, GlaxoSmithKline, Norvatis, Mundipharma and MSD. Research grants from Merck Serono Concor Study, MSD Apbord study. LBj has in the last three years received lecture or advisory board fees from Alk-Abello, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, Mundipharma, Novartis, Sanofi, Genzyme/Regeneron, and Teva. GWC has received research grants, as well as lecture or advisory board fees from A. Menarini, Alk-Albello, Allergy Therapeutics, Anallergo, AstraZeneca, MedImmune, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi Farmaceutici, Circassia, Danone, Faes, Genentech, Guidotti Malesci, GlaxoSmithKline, Hal Allergy, Merck, MSD, Mundipharma, Novartis, Orion, Sanofi Aventis, Sanofi, Genzyme/Regeneron, Stallergenes, UCB Pharma, Uriach Pharma, Teva, Thermo Fisher, and Valeas. TI received speaker bureau fees from Kyorin, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca and Sanofi. LJ-M has received fees as advisory board participant and/or speaker from AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, and Sanofi-Aventis; has participated in clinical trials for AstraZeneca, Novartis, and GlaxoSmithKline. DP has advisory board membership with AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Viatris, Teva Pharmaceuticals; consultancy agreements with AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Viatris, Teva Pharmaceuticals; grants and unrestricted funding for investigator-initiated studies conducted through Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute Pte Ltd from AstraZeneca, Chiesi, Viatris, Novartis, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi Genzyme, and UK National Health Service; payment for lectures/speaking engagements from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Cipla, Commune Digital, GlaxoSmithKline, Medscape, Viatris, Novartis, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals and Sanofi Genzyme, Teva Pharmaceuticals; payment for travel/accommodation/meeting expenses from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Medscape, Teva Pharmaceuticals; stock/stock options from AKL Research and Development Ltd which produces phytopharmaceuticals; owns 74% of the social enterprise Optimum Patient Care Ltd Australia and UK and 92.61% of Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute Pte Ltd Singapore; 5% shareholding in Timestamp which develops adherence monitoring technology; is peer reviewer for grant committees of the UK Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation Programme, and Health Technology Assessment; and was an expert witness for GlaxoSmithKline. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Porsbjerg, Townend, Bergeron, Christoff, Katsoulotos, Larenas-Linnemann, Tran, Al-Lehebi, Bosnic-Anticevich, Busby, Hew, Kostikas, Papadopoulos, Pfeffer, Popov, Rhee, Sadatsafavi, Tsai, Ulrik, Al-Ahmad, Altraja, Beastall, Bulathsinhala, Carter, Cosio, Fletton, Hansen, Heaney, Hubbard, Kuna, Murray, Nagano, Pini, Cano Rosales, Schleich, Wechsler, Amaral, Bourdin, Brusselle, Chen, Chung, Denton, Fonseca, Hoyte, Jackson, Katial, Kirenga, Koh, Ławkiedraj, Lehtimäki, Liew, Mahboub, Martin, Menzies-Gow, Pang, Papaioannou, Patel, Perez-De-Llano, Peters, Ricciardi, Rodríguez-Cáceres, Solarte, Tay, Torres-Duque, Wang, Zappa, Abisheganaden, Assing, Costello, Gibson, Heffler, Máspero, Nicola, Perng (Steve), Puggioni, Salvi, Sheu, Sirena, Taillé, Tan, Bjermer, Canonica, Iwanaga, Jiménez-Maldonado, Taube, Brussino and Price.)- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Reply to "Exploring the long-term effects of biologic initiation in severe asthma: Insights from the International Severe Asthma Registry".
- Author
-
Chen W, Tran TN, Sadatsafavi M, Murray RB, Boon Wong NC, Ali N, Ariti C, Bulathsinhala L, Garcia Gil E, FitzGerald JM, Alacqua M, Al-Ahmad M, Altraja A, Al-Lehebi R, Bhutani M, Bjermer L, Bjerrum AS, Bourdin A, von Bülow A, Busby J, Canonica GW, Carter V, Christoff GC, Cosio BG, Costello RW, Fonseca JA, Gibson PG, Yoo KH, Heaney LG, Heffler E, Hew M, Hilberg O, Hoyte F, Iwanaga T, Jackson DJ, Jones RC, Koh MS, Kuna P, Larenas-Linnemann D, Lehmann S, Lehtimäki L, Lyu J, Mahboub B, Maspero J, Menzies-Gow AN, Newell A, Sirena C, Papadopoulos NG, Papaioannou AI, Perez-de-Llano L, Perng Steve DW, Peters MJ, Pfeffer PE, Porsbjerg CM, Popov TA, Rhee CK, Salvi S, Taillé C, Taube C, Torres-Duque CA, Ulrik C, Ra SW, Wang E, Wechsler ME, and Price DB
- Subjects
- Humans, Biological Products, Asthma drug therapy
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Association Between T2-related Comorbidities and Effectiveness of Biologics in Severe Asthma.
- Author
-
Wechsler ME, Scelo G, Larenas-Linnemann DES, Torres-Duque CA, Maspero J, Tran TN, Murray RB, Martin N, Menzies-Gow AN, Hew M, Peters MJ, Gibson PG, Christoff GC, Popov TA, Côté A, Bergeron C, Dorscheid D, FitzGerald JM, Chapman KR, Boulet LP, Bhutani M, Sadatsafavi M, Jiménez-Maldonado L, Duran-Silva M, Rodriguez B, Celis-Preciado CA, Cano-Rosales DJ, Solarte I, Fernandez-Sanchez MJ, Parada-Tovar P, von Bülow A, Bjerrum AS, Ulrik CS, Assing KD, Rasmussen LM, Hansen S, Altraja A, Bourdin A, Taille C, Charriot J, Roche N, Papaioannou AI, Kostikas K, Papadopoulos NG, Salvi S, Long D, Mitchell PD, Costello R, Sirena C, Cardini C, Heffler E, Puggioni F, Canonica GW, Guida G, Iwanaga T, Al-Ahmad M, García U, Kuna P, Fonseca JA, Al-Lehebi R, Koh MS, Rhee CK, Cosio BG, Perez de Llano L, Perng DS, Huang EW, Wang HC, Tsai MJ, Mahboub B, Salameh LIJ, Jackson DJ, Busby J, Heaney LG, Pfeffer PE, Goddard AG, Wang E, Hoyte FCL, Chapman NM, Katial R, Carter V, Bulathsinhala L, Eleangovan N, Ariti C, Lyu J, Porsbjerg C, and Price DB
- Subjects
- Adult, Humans, Cohort Studies, Comorbidity, Chronic Disease, Rhinitis complications, Rhinitis drug therapy, Rhinitis epidemiology, Asthma complications, Asthma drug therapy, Asthma epidemiology, Sinusitis drug therapy, Sinusitis epidemiology, Biological Products therapeutic use, Rhinitis, Allergic complications, Rhinitis, Allergic drug therapy, Rhinitis, Allergic epidemiology, Nasal Polyps complications, Nasal Polyps drug therapy, Nasal Polyps epidemiology
- Abstract
Rationale: Previous studies investigating the impact of comorbidities on the effectiveness of biologic agents have been relatively small and of short duration and have not compared classes of biologic agents. Objectives: To determine the association between type 2-related comorbidities and biologic agent effectiveness in adults with severe asthma (SA). Methods: This cohort study used International Severe Asthma Registry data from 21 countries (2017-2022) to quantify changes in four outcomes before and after biologic therapy-annual asthma exacerbation rate, FEV
1 % predicted, asthma control, and long-term oral corticosteroid daily dose-in patients with or without allergic rhinitis, chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) with or without nasal polyps (NPs), NPs, or eczema/atopic dermatitis. Measurements and Main Results: Of 1,765 patients, 1,257, 421, and 87 initiated anti-IL-5/5 receptor, anti-IgE, and anti-IL-4/13 therapies, respectively. In general, pre- versus post-biologic therapy improvements were noted in all four asthma outcomes assessed, irrespective of comorbidity status. However, patients with comorbid CRS with or without NPs experienced 23% fewer exacerbations per year (95% CI, 10-35%; P < 0.001) and had 59% higher odds of better post-biologic therapy asthma control (95% CI, 26-102%; P < 0.001) than those without CRS with or without NPs. Similar estimates were noted for those with comorbid NPs: 22% fewer exacerbations and 56% higher odds of better post-biologic therapy control. Patients with SA and CRS with or without NPs had an additional FEV1 % predicted improvement of 3.2% (95% CI, 1.0-5.3; P = 0.004), a trend that was also noted in those with comorbid NPs. The presence of allergic rhinitis or atopic dermatitis was not associated with post-biologic therapy effect for any outcome assessed. Conclusions: These findings highlight the importance of systematic comorbidity evaluation. The presence of CRS with or without NPs or NPs alone may be considered a predictor of the effectiveness of biologic agents in patients with SA.- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Analysis of comorbidities and multimorbidity in adult patients in the International Severe Asthma Registry.
- Author
-
Scelo G, Torres-Duque CA, Maspero J, Tran TN, Murray R, Martin N, Menzies-Gow AN, Hew M, Peters MJ, Gibson PG, Christoff GC, Popov TA, Côté A, Bergeron C, Dorscheid D, FitzGerald JM, Chapman KR, Boulet LP, Bhutani M, Sadatsafavi M, Jiménez-Maldonado L, Duran-Silva M, Rodriguez B, Celis-Preciado CA, Cano-Rosales DJ, Solarte I, Fernandez-Sanchez MJ, Parada-Tovar P, von Bülow A, Bjerrum AS, Ulrik CS, Assing KD, Rasmussen LM, Hansen S, Altraja A, Bourdin A, Taille C, Charriot J, Roche N, Papaioannou AI, Kostikas K, Papadopoulos NG, Salvi S, Long D, Mitchell PD, Costello R, Sirena C, Cardini C, Heffler E, Puggioni F, Canonica GW, Guida G, Iwanaga T, Al-Ahmad M, Linnemann DL, Garcia U, Kuna P, Fonseca JA, Al-Lehebi R, Koh MS, Rhee CK, Cosio BG, de Llano LP, Perng Steve DW, Huang EW, Wang HC, Tsai MJ, Mahboub B, Salameh LIJ, Jackson D, Busby J, Heaney LG, Pfeffer P, Goddard AG, Wang E, Hoyte F, Wechsler ME, Chapman N, Katial R, Carter V, Bulathsinhala L, Eleangovan N, Ariti C, Lyu J, Price DB, and Porsbjerg C
- Subjects
- Adult, Humans, Male, Female, Multimorbidity, Cross-Sectional Studies, Comorbidity, Chronic Disease, Registries, Asthma epidemiology, Sinusitis epidemiology
- Abstract
Background: Investigation for the presence of asthma comorbidities is recommended by the Global Initiative for Asthma because their presence can complicate asthma management., Objective: To understand the prevalence and pattern of comorbidities and multimorbidity in adults with severe asthma and their association with asthma-related outcomes., Methods: This was a cross-sectional study using data from the International Severe Asthma Registry from 22 countries. A total of 30 comorbidities were identified and categorized a priori as any of the following: (1) potentially type 2-related comorbidities, (2) potentially oral corticosteroid (OCS)-related comorbidities, or (3) comorbidities mimicking or aggravating asthma. The association between comorbidities and asthma-related outcomes was investigated using multivariable models adjusted for country, age at enrollment, and sex (ie male or female)., Results: Of the 11,821 patients, 69%, 67%, and 55% had at least 1 potentially type 2-related, potentially OCS-related, or mimicking or aggravating comorbidities, respectively; 57% had 3 or more comorbidities, and 33% had comorbidities in all 3 categories. Patients with allergic rhinitis, nasal polyposis, and chronic rhinosinusitis experienced 1.12 (P = .003), 1.16 (P < .001), and 1.29 times (P < .001) more exacerbations per year, respectively, than those without. Patients with nasal polyposis and chronic rhinosinusitis were 40% and 46% more likely (P < .001), respectively, to have received long-term (LT) OCS. All assessed potential OCS-related comorbidities (except obesity) were associated with a greater likelihood of LTOCS use (odds ratios [ORs]: 1.23-2.77) and, except for dyslipidemia, with a greater likelihood of uncontrolled asthma (ORs: 1.29-1.68). All mimicking or aggravating comorbidities assessed were associated with more exacerbations (1.24-1.68 times more), all (except bronchiectasis) with increased likelihood of uncontrolled asthma (ORs: 1.57-1.81), and all (except chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) with increased likelihood of LTOCS use (ORs: 1.37-1.57). A greater number of comorbidities was associated with worse outcomes., Conclusion: In a global study, comorbidity or multimorbidity is reported in most adults with severe asthma and is associated with poorer asthma-related outcomes., Clinical Trial Registration: The International Severe Asthma Registry database has ethical approval from the Anonymous Data Ethics Protocols and Transparency (ADEPT) committee (ADEPT0218) and is registered with the European Union Electronic Register of Post-Authorization Studies (European Network Centres for Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacovigilance [ENCEPP]/DSPP/23720). The study was designed, implemented, and reported in compliance with the European Network Centres for Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacovigilance (ENCEPP) Code of Conduct (EMA 2014; EUPAS44024) and with all applicable local and international laws and regulations, and registered with ENCEPP (https://www.encepp.eu/encepp/viewResource.htm?id=48848). Governance was provided by ADEPT (registration number: ADEPT1121)., Competing Interests: Disclosures Dr Scelo and Dr Murray are consultants for the Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute (OPRI). Dr Torres-Duque has received fees as an advisory board participant and/or speaker from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, and Sanofi-Aventis; has taken part in clinical trials from AstraZeneca, Novartis, and Sanofi-Aventis; and has received unrestricted grants for investigator-initiated studies at Fundacion Neumologica Colombiana from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Grifols, and Novartis. Dr Maspero reports receiving speaker fees, grants, or fees for serving on advisory boards for AstraZeneca, Sanofi, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Inmunotek, Menarini, and Noucor. Dr Tran, Dr Menzies-Gow, and Dr Martin are employees of AstraZeneca and may own stock or stock options in AstraZeneca. Dr Hew reports receiving grants and other advisory board fees (made to his institutional employer) from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Sanofi, Teva, and Seqirus for unrelated projects. Dr Peters reports receiving personal fees and nonfinancial support from AstraZeneca and GlaxoSmithKline. Dr Gibson has received speaking fees and grants to his institution from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, and Novartis. Dr Popov reports receiving relevant research support from Novartis and Chiesi Pharma. Dr Côté reports receiving speaking fees and consultant fees from Sanofi, Regeneron, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, and ValeoPharma and reports receiving unrestricted grant support from GlaxoSmithKline; Dr Bergeron reports advisory board participation in Sanofi, AstraZeneca, Takeda, and ValeoPharma and honorarium for presentations for GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca, Amgen, Grifols, Sanofi, Regeneron, and ValeoPharma. Dr Dorscheid is on faculty at the University of British Columbia and is supported by grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, British Columbia Lung Association, and Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research. In addition, he has received speaking fees, travel grants, unrestricted project grants, and writing fees and is a paid consultant for Sanofi-Regeneron, Novartis Canada, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, and ValeoPharma and is an active member of the Canadian Thoracic Society, American Thoracic Society, European Respiratory Society, and the Allergen Research Network. Dr FitzGerald previously reported receiving grants from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi-Regeneron, and Novartis paid directly to UBC and personal fees for lectures and attending advisory boards for AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi-Regeneron, and Teva. Dr Chapman reports receiving grants from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bellus, CSL Behring, GlaxoSmithKline, Grifols, Inhibrx, Novartis, Regeneron, Sanofi, Takeda, and Vertex and consulting fees from AstraZeneca, CSL Behring, GlaxoSmithKline, Grifols, Inhibrx, Novartis, Sanofi, and Takeda; he has a leadership or fiduciary role in Alpha-1 Canada, the Canadian Thoracic Society, and Alpha-1 Foundation. Dr Boulet has received grants for participation in clinical studies from Amgen, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi-Regeneron, and BioHaven; for consulting and advisory boards from AstraZeneca, Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, and Sanofi-Regeneron; and lecture fees from AstraZeneca, Covis, Cipla, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Merck, and Sanofi. Dr Bhutani has received speaker and consultant fees for AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi, Covis, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Valeo. Dr Sadatsafavi has received honoraria from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Teva, and GlaxoSmithKline for purposes unrelated to the content of this manuscript; and has received research funding from AstraZeneca and Boehringer Ingelheim directly into his research account from AstraZeneca for unrelated projects. Dr Jiménez-Maldonado has received fees as an advisory board participant and/or speaker from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, and Sanofi-Aventis and has participated in clinical trials for AstraZeneca, Novartis, and GlaxoSmithKline. Dr Duran-Silva has received fees as an advisory board participant and/or speaker from Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, and Sanofi-Aventis and has taken part in clinical trials from AstraZeneca, Novartis, and Sanofi-Aventis. Dr Solarte received fees from GlaxoSmithKline for participation on advisory boards. Dr Fernandez-Sanchez is a part-time employee of GlaxoSmithKline and does not hold shares in the company. Dr Bülow reports receiving speakers fees and consultancy fees from AstraZeneca and Novartis outside the submitted work and has also attended the advisory board for Novartis and AstraZeneca. Dr Bjerrum has received lecture fees from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, and Novartis. Dr Ulrik reports receiving personal fees for talks and participation in advisory boards, among others, from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Teva, Boehringer Ingelheim, Orion Pharma, Sanofi-Genzyme, TFF Pharmaceuticals, Covis Pharma, Berlin-Chemie, Takeda, Chiesi, and Pfizer outside the submitted work. Dr Rasmussen declares receiving speaker fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Teva, ALK, and Mundipharma outside the submitted work and attended advisory board for AstraZeneca, Sanofi, and Teva. Dr Altraja has received lecture fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, MSD, Norameda, Novartis, Orion, Sanofi, and Zentiva; sponsorships from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, MSD, Norameda, Novartis, and Sanofi; and has participated in advisory boards for AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Sanofi, and Teva. Dr Bourdin has received industry-sponsored grants from AstraZeneca-MedImmune, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cephalon/Teva, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, and Sanofi-Regeneron and consultancies with AstraZeneca-MedImmune, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Regeneron-Sanofi, Med-in-Cell, Actelion, Merck, Roche, and Chiesi. Dr Taille has received lecture or advisory board fees and grants to her institution from AstraZeneca, Sanofi, GlaxoSmithKline, Chiesi, and Novartis for unrelated projects. Dr Charriot reports receiving advisory board and lecture fees from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi; consulting fees for Chiesi; and serving as a trial coinvestigator for AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, and Sanofi. Dr Roche reports receiving grants and personal fees from Austral, Biosency, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, and Pfizer and personal fees from MSD, GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca, Chiesi, Sanofi, Menarini, and Zambon. Dr Papaioannou has received fees and honoraria from Menarini, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Elpen, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, and Chiesi. Dr Kostikas received honoraria for presentations and consultancy fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, CSL Behring, Chiesi, ELPEN, GILEAD, GlaxoSmithKline, Menarini, Novartis, Sanofi, Specialty Therapeutics, and WebMD; and received funding and grants from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Innovis, ELPEN, GlaxoSmithKline, Menarini, Novartis, and NuvoAir (paid to the University of Ioannina). Dr Papadopoulos has been a speaker and/or advisory board member for Abbott, AbbVie, ALK, Asit Biotech, AstraZeneca, Biomay, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, HAL, Faes Farma, Medscape, Menarini, MSD, Novartis, Nutricia, OM Pharma, Regeneron, Sanofi, Takeda, and Viatris. Dr Salvi reports receiving research support and speaker fees from Cipla, Glenmark, and GlaxoSmithKline. Dr Mitchell has received speaker fees from GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca, Teva, and Novartis and has received grants from AstraZeneca and Teva. Dr Costello has received honoraria for lectures from Aerogen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, and Teva; is a member of advisory boards for GlaxoSmithKline and Novartis; has received grant support from GlaxoSmithKline and Aerogen; and has patents in the use of acoustics in the diagnosis of lung disease, assessment of adherence, and prediction of exacerbations. Dr Heffler declares receiving personal fees from Sanofi, Regeneron, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Stallergenes, and Circassia. Dr Puggioni reports having received lectures or advisory board fees from Menarini, Mundipharma, Chiesi, Alk Abello, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Guidotti, Malesci, GlaxoSmithKline, HAL Allergy, Novartis, Sanofi, Regeneron, Stallergenes Greer, Valeas, and Almirall. Dr Canonica has received research grants and lecture or advisory board fees from A. Menarini, Alk-Albello, Allergy Therapeutics, Anallergo, AstraZeneca, MedImmune, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi Farmaceutici, Circassia, Danone, Faes, Genentech, Guidotti Malesci, GlaxoSmithKline, HAL Allergy, Merck, MSD, Mundipharma, Novartis, Orion, Sanofi-Aventis, Sanofi, Genzyme/Regeneron, Stallergenes, UCB Pharma, Uriach Pharma, Teva, Thermo Fisher, and Valeas. Dr Iwanaga received lecture fees from Kyorin, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, and AstraZeneca. Dr Mona Al-Ahmad has received advisory board and speaker fees from AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Novartis, and GlaxoSmithKline and received a grant from the Kuwait Foundation for the Advancement of Sciences (KFAS). Dr Linnemann reports receiving personal fees from ALK-Abelló, AstraZeneca national and global, Bayer, Chiesi, Grunenthal, Grin, GlaxoSmithKline national and global, Viatris, Menarini, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Siegfried, UCB, and Carnot and grants from AbbVie, Bayer, Lilly, Sanofi, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Novartis, Circassia, UCB, and GlaxoSmithKline outside the submitted work. Dr Garcia Ramirez received fees as a speaker and advisory board participant from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi-Genzyme, Chiesi, and Novartis. Dr Kuna reports receiving personal fees from Adamed, AstraZeneca, Berlin-Chemie Menarini, FAES, Glenmark, Novartis, Polpharma, Boehringer Ingelheim, Teva, and Zentiva outside the submitted work. Dr Fonseca reports receiving grants from or has research agreements with AstraZeneca, Mundipharma, Sanofi-Regeneron, and Novartis and has received personal fees for lectures and attending advisory boards for AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Mundipharma, Novartis, Sanofi-Regeneron, and Teva. Dr Lehebi has given lectures at meetings supported by AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline, and Sanofi and participated in advisory board fees from GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca, Novartis, and Abbott. Dr Koh reports receiving grant support from AstraZeneca and honoraria for lectures and advisory board meetings paid to her hospital (Singapore General Hospital) from GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Sanofi, and Boehringer Ingelheim outside the submitted work. Dr Kook Rhee received consulting/lecture fees from MSD, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Takeda, Mundipharma, Boehringer Ingelheim, Teva, Sanofi, and Bayer. Dr Cosio declares receiving grants from Chiesi and GlaxoSmithKline; personal fees for advisory board activities from Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Sanofi, Teva, and AstraZeneca; and payment for lectures/speaking engagements from Chiesi, Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline, Menarini, and AstraZeneca outside the submitted work. Dr de Llano reports receiving grants, personal fees and nonfinancial support from AstraZeneca, Teva, Faes, and Sanofi; personal fees and nonfinancial support from GlaxoSmithKline and Chiesi; personal fees from MSD, Techdow Pharma, GILEAD, and Leo Pharma; and grants and personal fees from GEBRO outside the submitted work. Dr Perng received sponsorship to attend or speak at international meetings, honoraria for lecturing or attending advisory boards, and research grants from the following companies: AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Daiichi Sankyo, Shionogi, and Orient Pharma. Dr Tsai has received grants from Boehringer Ingelheim and has received honoraria for lectures from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, and Orient EuroPharma. Dr Jackson has received speaker fees and consultancy fees from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi-Regeneron, and Boehringer Ingelheim and research funding from AstraZeneca. Dr Busby has received research grants from AstraZeneca and personnel fees from NuvoAir outside the submitted work. Dr Heaney has received grant funding, participated in advisory boards, and given lectures at meetings supported by Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Circassia, Hoffmann la Roche, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Theravance, Evelo Biosciences, Sanofi, and Teva; has received grants from MedImmune, Novartis UK, Roche/Genentech Inc, GlaxoSmithKline, Amgen, Genentech/Hoffman la Roche, AstraZeneca, Aerocrine, and Vitalograph; has received sponsorship for attending international scientific meetings from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, and Napp Pharmaceuticals; has taken part in asthma clinical trials sponsored by AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Hoffmann la Roche, and GlaxoSmithKline, for which his institution received remuneration; and is the Academic Lead for the Medical Research Council Stratified Medicine UK Consortium in Severe Asthma, which involves industrial partnerships with a number of pharmaceutical companies including Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Hoffmann la Roche, and Janssen. Dr Pfeffer has attended advisory boards for AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, and Sanofi; has given lectures at meetings supported by AstraZeneca and GlaxoSmithKline; has taken part in clinical trials sponsored by AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, and Sanofi, for which his institution received remuneration; and has a current research grant funded by GlaxoSmithKline. Dr Goddard reports receiving lecture fees from Sanofi. Dr Wang has received honoraria from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, and Genentech; and has been an investigator on studies sponsored by AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Genentech, Sanofi, Novartis, and Teva, for which her institution has received funding. Dr Hoyte reports receiving honoraria from AstraZeneca and Genentech and has been an investigator on clinical trials sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline, Genentech, Teva, and Sanofi, for which her institution has received funding. Dr Wechsler reports receiving grants and/or personal fees from Novartis, Sanofi, Regeneron, Genentech, Sentien, resTORbio, Equillium, Genzyme, Cohero Health, Teva, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Amgen, GlaxoSmithKline, Cytoreason, Cerecor, Sound biologic, Incyte, and Kinaset. Ms Carter is an employee of Optimum Patient Care (OPC) (OPC is a cofounder of the International Severe Asthma Registry and a cofounder of the APEX-COPD initiative). Ms Bulathsinhala is an employee of OPRI. Ms Eleangovan and Mr Ariti were employees of OPRI. Dr Lyu was an employee of OPC. Dr Price has advisory board membership with Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Circassia, Mylan, Mundipharma, Novartis, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi-Genzyme, Teva Pharmaceuticals, Thermofisher; consultancy agreements with Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, Mylan, Mundipharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Teva Pharmaceuticals, Theravance; received grants and unrestricted funding for investigator-initiated studies (conducted through OPRI Pte Ltd) from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Circassia, Mylan, Mundipharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Respiratory Effectiveness Group, Sanofi-Genzyme, Teva Pharmaceuticals, Theravance, and the UK National Health Service; received payment for lectures/speaking engagements from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Cipla, GlaxoSmithKline, Kyorin, Mylan, Mundipharma, Novartis, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi-Genzyme, Teva Pharmaceuticals; payment for the development of educational materials from Mundipharma, Novartis; payment for travel/accommodation/meeting expenses from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Mundipharma, Mylan, Novartis, Thermofisher; funding for patient enrollment or completion of research from Novartis; has stock/stock options from AKL Research and Development Ltd, which produces phytopharmaceuticals; owns 74% of the social enterprise OPC Ltd (Australia and UK) and 74% of OPRI Pte Ltd (Singapore); has 5% shareholding in Timestamp, which develops adherence monitoring technology; is a peer reviewer for grant committees of the Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation program and Health Technology Assessment; and was an expert witness for GlaxoSmithKline. Dr Porsbjerg has attended advisory boards for AstraZeneca, Novartis, Teva, and Sanofi-Genzyme; has given lectures at meetings supported by AstraZeneca, Novartis, Teva, Sanofi-Genzyme, and GlaxoSmithKline; has taken part in clinical trials sponsored by AstraZeneca, Novartis, MSD, Sanofi-Genzyme, GlaxoSmithKline, and Novartis; and has received educational and research grants from AstraZeneca, Novartis, Teva, GlaxoSmithKline, ALK, and Sanofi-Genzyme. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to report., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Impact of Initiating Biologics in Patients With Severe Asthma on Long-Term Oral Corticosteroids or Frequent Rescue Steroids (GLITTER): Data From the International Severe Asthma Registry.
- Author
-
Chen W, Tran TN, Sadatsafavi M, Murray R, Wong NCB, Ali N, Ariti C, Bulathsinhala L, Gil EG, FitzGerald JM, Alacqua M, Al-Ahmad M, Altraja A, Al-Lehebi R, Bhutani M, Bjermer L, Bjerrum AS, Bourdin A, von Bülow A, Busby J, Canonica GW, Carter V, Christoff GC, Cosio BG, Costello RW, Fonseca JA, Gibson PG, Yoo KH, Heaney LG, Heffler E, Hew M, Hilberg O, Hoyte F, Iwanaga T, Jackson DJ, Jones RC, Koh MS, Kuna P, Larenas-Linnemann D, Lehmann S, Lehtimäki L, Lyu J, Mahboub B, Maspero J, Menzies-Gow AN, Newell A, Sirena C, Papadopoulos NG, Papaioannou AI, Perez-de-Llano L, Perng Steve DW, Peters M, Pfeffer PE, Porsbjerg CM, Popov TA, Rhee CK, Salvi S, Taillé C, Taube C, Torres-Duque CA, Ulrik C, Ra SW, Wang E, Wechsler ME, and Price DB
- Subjects
- Adult, Humans, Prospective Studies, Adrenal Cortex Hormones therapeutic use, Steroids therapeutic use, Asthma drug therapy, Asthma epidemiology, Asthma chemically induced, Biological Products therapeutic use, Anti-Asthmatic Agents therapeutic use
- Abstract
Background: Effectiveness of biologics has neither been established in patients with high oral corticosteroid exposure (HOCS) nor been compared with effectiveness of continuing with HOCS alone., Objective: To examine the effectiveness of initiating biologics in a large, real-world cohort of adult patients with severe asthma and HOCS., Methods: This was a propensity score-matched, prospective cohort study using data from the International Severe Asthma Registry. Between January 2015 and February 2021, patients with severe asthma and HOCS (long-term OCSs for ≥1 year or ≥4 courses of rescue OCSs within a 12-month period) were identified. Biologic initiators were identified and, using propensity scores, matched 1:1 with noninitiators. The impact of biologic initiation on asthma outcomes was assessed using generalized linear models., Results: We identified 996 matched pairs of patients. Both groups improved over the 12-month follow-up period, but improvement was greater for biologic initiators. Biologic initiation was associated with a 72.9% reduction in the average number of exacerbations per year versus noninitiators (0.64 vs 2.06; rate ratio, 0.27 [95% CI, 0.10-0.71]). Biologic initiators were 2.2 times more likely than noninitiators to take a daily long-term OCS dose of less than 5 mg (risk probability, 49.6% vs 22.5%; P = .002) and had a lower risk of asthma-related emergency department visits (relative risk, 0.35 [95% CI, 0.21-0.58]; rate ratio, 0.26 [0.14-0.48]) and hospitalizations (relative risk, 0.31 [95% CI, 0.18-0.52]; rate ratio, 0.25 [0.13-0.48])., Conclusions: In a real-world setting, including patients with severe asthma and HOCS from 19 countries, and within an environment of clinical improvement, initiation of biologics was associated with further improvements across multiple asthma outcomes, including exacerbation rate, OCS exposure, and health care resource utilization., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. Validation of a Pathological Score for the Assessment of Bronchial Biopsies in Severe Uncontrolled Asthma: Beyond Blood Eosinophils.
- Author
-
Cosio BG, Shafiek H, Iglesias A, Mosteiro M, Gonzalez-Piñeiro A, Rodríguez M, García-Cosío M, Busto E, Martin J, Mejías L, Benito A, López Vilaro L, and Gómez C
- Subjects
- Humans, Eosinophils, Bronchi, Hyperplasia pathology, Inflammation, Biopsy, Asthma diagnosis, Asthma drug therapy, Asthma pathology, Eosinophilia
- Abstract
Background: Blood eosinophil count (BEC) is currently used as a surrogate marker of T2 inflammation in severe asthma but its relationship with tissue T2-related changes is elusive. Bronchial biopsy could add reliable information but lacks standardization., Objectives: To validate a systematic assessment of the bronchial biopsy for the evaluation of severe uncontrolled asthma (SUA) by standardizing a pathological score., Methods: A systematic assessment of submucosal inflammation, tissue eosinophilic count/field (TEC), goblet cells hyperplasia, epithelial changes, basement membrane thickening, prominent airway smooth muscle and submucosal mucous glands was initially agreed and validated in representative bronchial biopsies of 12 patients with SUA by 8 independent pathologists. In a second phase, 62 patients with SUA who were divided according to BEC≥300cells/mm
3 or less underwent bronchoscopy with bronchial biopsies and the correlations between the pathological findings and the clinical characteristics were investigated., Results: The score yielded good agreement among pathologists regarding submucosal eosinophilia, TEC, goblet cells hyperplasia and mucosal glands (ICC=0.85, 0.81, 0.85 and 0.87 respectively). There was a statistically significant correlation between BEC and TEC (r=0.393, p=0.005) that disappeared after correction by oral corticosteroids (OCS) use (r=0.170, p=0.307). However, there was statistically significant correlation between FeNO and TEC (r=0.481, p=0.006) that was maintained after correction to OCS use (r=0.419, p=0.021). 82.4% of low-BEC had submucosal eosinophilia, 50% of them moderate to severe., Conclusion: A standardized assessment of endobronchial biopsy is feasible and could be useful for a better phenotyping of SUA especially in those receiving OCS., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. Comparative effectiveness of anti-IL5 and anti-IgE biologic classes in patients with severe asthma eligible for both.
- Author
-
Pfeffer PE, Ali N, Murray R, Ulrik C, Tran TN, Maspero J, Peters M, Christoff GC, Sadatsafavi M, Torres-Duque CA, Altraja A, Lehtimäki L, Papadopoulos NG, Salvi S, Costello RW, Cushen B, Heffler E, Iwanaga T, Al-Ahmad M, Larenas-Linnemann D, Kuna P, Fonseca JA, Al-Lehebi R, Rhee CK, Perez-de-Llano L, Perng Steve DW, Mahboub B, Wang E, Goh C, Lyu J, Newell A, Alacqua M, Belevskiy AS, Bhutani M, Bjermer L, Bjornsdottir U, Bourdin A, Bulow AV, Busby J, Canonica GW, Cosio BG, Dorscheid DR, Muñoz-Esquerre M, FitzGerald JM, Gil EG, Gibson PG, Heaney LG, Hew M, Hilberg O, Hoyte F, Jackson DJ, Koh MS, Ko HB, Lee JH, Lehmann S, Chaves Loureiro C, Lúðvíksdóttir D, Menzies-Gow AN, Mitchell P, Papaioannou AI, Popov TA, Porsbjerg CM, Salameh L, Sirena C, Taillé C, Taube C, Tohda Y, Wechsler ME, and Price DB
- Subjects
- Humans, Adrenal Cortex Hormones therapeutic use, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized therapeutic use, Immunosuppressive Agents therapeutic use, Prospective Studies, Anti-Asthmatic Agents, Asthma drug therapy, Asthma chemically induced, Biological Products therapeutic use
- Abstract
Background: Patients with severe asthma may present with characteristics representing overlapping phenotypes, making them eligible for more than one class of biologic. Our aim was to describe the profile of adult patients with severe asthma eligible for both anti-IgE and anti-IL5/5R and to compare the effectiveness of both classes of treatment in real life., Methods: This was a prospective cohort study that included adult patients with severe asthma from 22 countries enrolled into the International Severe Asthma registry (ISAR) who were eligible for both anti-IgE and anti-IL5/5R. The effectiveness of anti-IgE and anti-IL5/5R was compared in a 1:1 matched cohort. Exacerbation rate was the primary effectiveness endpoint. Secondary endpoints included long-term-oral corticosteroid (LTOCS) use, asthma-related emergency room (ER) attendance, and hospital admissions., Results: In the matched analysis (n = 350/group), the mean annualized exacerbation rate decreased by 47.1% in the anti-IL5/5R group and 38.7% in the anti-IgE group. Patients treated with anti-IL5/5R were less likely to experience a future exacerbation (adjusted IRR 0.76; 95% CI 0.64, 0.89; p < 0.001) and experienced a greater reduction in mean LTOCS dose than those treated with anti-IgE (37.44% vs. 20.55% reduction; p = 0.023). There was some evidence to suggest that patients treated with anti-IL5/5R experienced fewer asthma-related hospitalizations (IRR 0.64; 95% CI 0.38, 1.08), but not ER visits (IRR 0.94, 95% CI 0.61, 1.43)., Conclusions: In real life, both anti-IgE and anti-IL5/5R improve asthma outcomes in patients eligible for both biologic classes; however, anti-IL5/5R was superior in terms of reducing asthma exacerbations and LTOCS use., (© 2023 The Authors. Allergy published by European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. Severe Asthma Standard-of-Care Background Medication Reduction With Benralizumab: ANDHI in Practice Substudy.
- Author
-
Louis R, Harrison TW, Chanez P, Menzella F, Philteos G, Cosio BG, Lugogo NL, de Luiz G, Burden A, Adlington T, Keeling N, Kwiatek J, and Garcia Gil E
- Subjects
- Adult, Humans, Adrenal Cortex Hormones therapeutic use, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized adverse effects, Double-Blind Method, Anti-Asthmatic Agents, Asthma drug therapy, Asthma chemically induced
- Abstract
Background: The phase IIIb, randomized, parallel-group, placebo-controlled ANDHI double-blind (DB) study extended understanding of the efficacy of benralizumab for patients with severe eosinophilic asthma. Patients from ANDHI DB could join the 56-week ANDHI in Practice (IP) single-arm, open-label extension substudy., Objective: Assess potential for standard-of-care background medication reductions while maintaining asthma control with benralizumab., Methods: Following ANDHI DB completion, eligible adults were enrolled in ANDHI IP. After an 8-week run-in with benralizumab, there were 5 visits to potentially reduce background asthma medications for patients achieving and maintaining protocol-defined asthma control with benralizumab. Main outcome measures for non-oral corticosteroid (OCS)-dependent patients were the proportions with at least 1 background medication reduction (ie, lower inhaled corticosteroid dose, background medication discontinuation) and the number of adapted Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) step reductions at end of treatment (EOT). Main outcomes for OCS-dependent patients were reductions in daily OCS dosage and proportion achieving OCS dosage of 5 mg or lower at EOT., Results: For non-OCS-dependent patients, 53.3% (n = 208 of 390) achieved at least 1 background medication reduction, increasing to 72.6% (n = 130 of 179) for patients who maintained protocol-defined asthma control at EOT. A total of 41.9% (n = 163 of 389) achieved at least 1 adapted GINA step reduction, increasing to 61.8% (n = 110 of 178) for patients with protocol-defined EOT asthma control. At ANDHI IP baseline, OCS dosages were 5 mg or lower for 40.4% (n = 40 of 99) of OCS-dependent patients. Of OCS-dependent patients, 50.5% (n = 50 of 99) eliminated OCS and 74.7% (n = 74 of 99) achieved dosages of 5 mg or lower at EOT., Conclusions: These findings demonstrate benralizumab's ability to improve asthma control, thereby allowing background medication reduction., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. Is Inhaler Technique Adequately Assessed and Reported in Clinical Trials of Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Therapy? A Systematic Review and Suggested Best Practice Checklist.
- Author
-
Dekhuijzen PNR, Levy ML, Corrigan CJ, Hadfield RM, Roche N, Usmani OS, Barnes PJ, Scullion JE, Lavorini F, Corbetta L, Kocks JWH, Cosio BG, Buhl R, and Pedersen SE
- Subjects
- Administration, Inhalation, Checklist, Humans, Nebulizers and Vaporizers, Asthma drug therapy, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive drug therapy
- Abstract
Background: Inhaled medications are central to treating asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), yet critical inhaler technique errors are made by up to 90% of patients. In the clinical research setting, recruitment of subjects with poor inhaler technique may give a false impression of both the benefits and the necessity of add-on treatments such as biologic therapies., Objective: To assess the frequency with which inhaler technique is assessed and reliably optimized before and during patient enrollment into randomized controlled trials (RCTs) addressing the efficacy of topical therapy, and the escalation of therapy for asthma and COPD., Methods: Systematic searches were conducted of PubMed and Embase for RCTs published in the past 10 years involving patients with a diagnosis of asthma or COPD undergoing escalation of baseline inhaled therapy (stepping up, changing, adding, switching, increasing, etc) or the introduction of biologic agents., Results: Searches highlighted 1,014 studies, 118 of which were eligible after the removal of duplicates as well as screening and full text review. Of these, only 14 (11.9%) included accessible information in the methods section or referred to such information in online supplements or protocols concerning assessment of participants' inhaler technique. We therefore developed the proposed Best Practice Inhaler Technique Assessment and Reporting Checklist., Conclusions: Our study identifies a concerning lack of checking and correcting inhaler technique, or at least reporting that this was undertaken, before enrollment in asthma and COPD RCTs, which may affect the conclusions drawn. Mandating the use of a standardized checklist in RCT protocols and ensuring all published RCTs report checking and correcting inhaler technique before enrollment are important next steps., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
13. Global Variability in Administrative Approval Prescription Criteria for Biologic Therapy in Severe Asthma.
- Author
-
Porsbjerg CM, Menzies-Gow AN, Tran TN, Murray RB, Unni B, Audrey Ang SL, Alacqua M, Al-Ahmad M, Al-Lehebi R, Altraja A, Belevskiy AS, Björnsdóttir US, Bourdin A, Busby J, Canonica GW, Christoff GC, Cosio BG, Costello RW, FitzGerald JM, Fonseca JA, Hansen S, Heaney LG, Heffler E, Hew M, Iwanaga T, Jackson DJ, Kocks JWH, Kallieri M, Bruce Ko HK, Koh MS, Larenas-Linnemann D, Lehtimäki LA, Loukides S, Lugogo N, Maspero J, Papaioannou AI, Perez-de-Llano L, Pitrez PM, Popov TA, Rasmussen LM, Rhee CK, Sadatsafavi M, Schmid J, Siddiqui S, Taillé C, Taube C, Torres-Duque CA, Ulrik C, Upham JW, Wang E, Wechsler ME, Bulathsinhala L, Carter V, Chaudhry I, Eleangovan N, Hosseini N, Rowlands MA, Price DB, and van Boven JFM
- Subjects
- Biological Therapy, Humans, Omalizumab therapeutic use, Prescriptions, Anti-Asthmatic Agents therapeutic use, Asthma drug therapy, Asthma epidemiology, Biological Products therapeutic use
- Abstract
Background: Regulatory bodies have approved five biologics for severe asthma. However, regional differences in accessibility may limit the global potential for personalized medicine., Objective: To compare global differences in ease of access to biologics., Methods: In April 2021, national prescription criteria for omalizumab, mepolizumab, reslizumab, benralizumab, and dupilumab were reviewed by severe asthma experts collaborating in the International Severe Asthma Registry. Outcomes (per country, per biologic) were (1) country-specific prescription criteria and (2) development of the Biologic Accessibility Score (BACS). The BACS composite score incorporates 10 prescription criteria, each with a maximum score of 10 points. Referenced to European Medicines Agency marketing authorization specifications, a higher score reflects easier access., Results: Biologic prescription criteria differed substantially across 28 countries from five continents. Blood eosinophil count thresholds (usually ≥300 cells/μL) and exacerbations were key requirements for anti-IgE/anti-IL-5/5R prescriptions in around 80% of licensed countries. Most countries (40% for dupilumab to 54% for mepolizumab) require two or more moderate or severe exacerbations, whereas numbers ranged from none to four. Moreover, 0% (for reslizumab) to 21% (for omalizumab) of countries required long-term oral corticosteroid use. The BACS highlighted marked between-country differences in ease of access. For omalizumab, mepolizumab, benralizumab, and dupilumab, only two, one, four, and seven countries, respectively, scored equal or higher than the European Medicines Agency reference BACS. For reslizumab, all countries scored lower., Conclusions: Although some differences were expected in country-specific biologic prescription criteria and ease of access, the substantial differences found in the current study present a challenge to implementing precision medicine across the world., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
14. Benralizumab improves symptoms of patients with severe, eosinophilic asthma with a diagnosis of nasal polyposis.
- Author
-
Canonica GW, Harrison TW, Chanez P, Menzella F, Louis R, Cosio BG, Lugogo NL, Mohan A, Burden A, and Garcia Gil E
- Subjects
- Adult, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized adverse effects, Disease Progression, Double-Blind Method, Eosinophils, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Treatment Outcome, Anti-Asthmatic Agents adverse effects, Asthma chemically induced, Asthma diagnosis, Asthma drug therapy, Pulmonary Eosinophilia drug therapy
- Abstract
Background: Clinically meaningful improvement in the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22) was observed in patients with severe, eosinophilic asthma, and nasal polyposis (NP) treated with benralizumab in the ANDHI trial. A post hoc assessment of the effects of benralizumab on SNOT-22 response and asthma efficacy measures in these patients was conducted for further characterization of the efficacy and safety of benralizumab for patients with severe asthma and NP., Methods: Adults with severe, eosinophilic asthma who had experienced ≥2 prior-year exacerbations despite high-dosage inhaled corticosteroid plus additional controller[s] were randomized to 24 weeks of benralizumab or placebo. Patients with physician-diagnosed chronic rhinosinusitis with NP of any severity ongoing at baseline who consented to participate were included in the current ANDHI NP substudy population. Effect on NP symptoms was assessed by the SNOT-22, with an improvement of at least 8.9 defined as clinically significant (responder). Effects on chronic asthma outcomes were assessed by means of annualized asthma exacerbation rate (AER), St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV
1 ), and Asthma Control Questionnaire-6 (ACQ-6). All p-values were nominal., Results: Of the ANDHI population (n = 656), 23% (n = 153) participated in the NP substudy (n = 96 benralizumab; n = 57 placebo). Patients were 50% female, with mean age of 53 years, had prior-year AER = 3.3; mean pre-bronchodilator FEV1 = 55% predicted; and median blood eosinophil count = 510 cells/µl. For patients with high baseline SNOT-22 scores (>30), benralizumab treatment improved symptoms of NP as measured by SNOT-22 from baseline to Week 24 compared with placebo (Week 24: -10.44 [p = .0176]). Percentage of responders to SNOT-22 was greater for benralizumab vs. placebo (71.3% vs. 45.5%; p = .0036), and effect was enhanced for patients with high baseline SNOT-22 scores (>30). A 69% reduction vs. placebo in annualized AER (0.77 vs. 2.47; p < .0001) and greater clinically meaningful improvements from baseline in SGRQ total score (-16.7), FEV1 (+0.32 L), and ACQ-6 (-0.88) were observed (p < .0001). Benralizumab was well-tolerated. Frequency of adverse events (AEs) was similar for benralizumab (76.0%) and placebo (73.7%) groups. Most common AEs (frequency ≥5%) reported at a greater frequency in benralizumab vs. placebo included headache, sinusitis, pyrexia, and influenza., Conclusions: These substudy data from ANDHI demonstrated the efficacy profile of benralizumab for patients with severe, eosinophilic asthma and NP, with improvement in SNOT-22 and asthma outcomes., (© 2021 EAACI and John Wiley and Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd.)- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
15. Integrated Safety and Efficacy Among Patients Receiving Benralizumab for Up to 5 Years.
- Author
-
Korn S, Bourdin A, Chupp G, Cosio BG, Arbetter D, Shah M, and Gil EG
- Subjects
- Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized therapeutic use, Disease Progression, Double-Blind Method, Eosinophils, Humans, Anti-Asthmatic Agents therapeutic use, Asthma drug therapy
- Abstract
Background: Benralizumab is an IL-5Rα-directed monoclonal antibody indicated for patients with severe, uncontrolled eosinophilic asthma., Objective: To evaluate the long-term safety and tolerability of benralizumab among adults treated for up to 5 years., Methods: This analysis included adults treated with placebo or subcutaneous benralizumab 30 mg every 4 or 8 weeks in the 48-week SIROCCO, 56-week CALIMA, and 28-week ZONDA pivotal trials, who were subsequently enrolled in the 56-week double-blind BORA extension and continued assigned regimens or initiated benralizumab (if previously on placebo) for 16 to 40 weeks, before entering the open-label MELTEMI extension. Safety was measured by adverse and serious adverse event rates. Exacerbations were evaluated in patients with blood eosinophils greater than or equal to 300 cells/μL receiving high-dose inhaled corticosteroids at baseline., Results: Overall, 446 received treatment and 384 (86.1%) completed the study; 157 (35.2%) received benralizumab for 4 or more years. Adverse and serious adverse event rates (28.5-32.4 and 6.3-8.4 per 100 patient-years, respectively) were low, stable over time, and did not increase with exposure; few (n = 8) discontinued because of adverse events. Serious infections and hypersensitivity event rates were consistent with those in previous studies. Among patients with blood eosinophils greater than or equal to 300 cells/μL-high-dosage inhaled corticosteroids receiving benralizumab every 8 weeks, at least 75% had zero exacerbations annually during the integrated analysis period., Conclusions: In patients with severe, uncontrolled eosinophilic asthma, long-term benralizumab was safe and well tolerated for up to 5 years. There were no new safety signals, and exacerbations were eliminated in similar percentages of patients as in predecessor studies., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
16. Eosinophilic and Noneosinophilic Asthma: An Expert Consensus Framework to Characterize Phenotypes in a Global Real-Life Severe Asthma Cohort.
- Author
-
Heaney LG, Perez de Llano L, Al-Ahmad M, Backer V, Busby J, Canonica GW, Christoff GC, Cosio BG, FitzGerald JM, Heffler E, Iwanaga T, Jackson DJ, Menzies-Gow AN, Papadopoulos NG, Papaioannou AI, Pfeffer PE, Popov TA, Porsbjerg CM, Rhee CK, Sadatsafavi M, Tohda Y, Wang E, Wechsler ME, Alacqua M, Altraja A, Bjermer L, Björnsdóttir US, Bourdin A, Brusselle GG, Buhl R, Costello RW, Hew M, Koh MS, Lehmann S, Lehtimäki L, Peters M, Taillé C, Taube C, Tran TN, Zangrilli J, Bulathsinhala L, Carter VA, Chaudhry I, Eleangovan N, Hosseini N, Kerkhof M, Murray RB, Price CA, and Price DB
- Subjects
- Adult, Age of Onset, Anti-Asthmatic Agents classification, Anti-Asthmatic Agents therapeutic use, Biological Variation, Population, Cohort Studies, Eosinophilia diagnosis, Female, Global Health statistics & numerical data, Humans, Leukocyte Count methods, Leukocyte Count statistics & numerical data, Male, Middle Aged, Prevalence, Respiratory Function Tests methods, Severity of Illness Index, Adrenal Cortex Hormones therapeutic use, Asthma blood, Asthma diagnosis, Asthma drug therapy, Asthma epidemiology, Eosinophils, Patient Care Management methods, Registries statistics & numerical data
- Abstract
Background: Phenotypic characteristics of patients with eosinophilic and noneosinophilic asthma are not well characterized in global, real-life severe asthma cohorts., Research Question: What is the prevalence of eosinophilic and noneosinophilic phenotypes in the population with severe asthma, and can these phenotypes be differentiated by clinical and biomarker variables?, Study Design and Methods: This was an historical registry study. Adult patients with severe asthma and available blood eosinophil count (BEC) from 11 countries enrolled in the International Severe Asthma Registry (January 1, 2015-September 30, 2019) were categorized according to likelihood of eosinophilic phenotype using a predefined gradient eosinophilic algorithm based on highest BEC, long-term oral corticosteroid use, elevated fractional exhaled nitric oxide, nasal polyps, and adult-onset asthma. Demographic and clinical characteristics were defined at baseline (ie, 1 year before or closest to date of BEC)., Results: One thousand seven hundred sixteen patients with prospective data were included; 83.8% were identified as most likely (grade 3), 8.3% were identified as likely (grade 2), and 6.3% identified as least likely (grade 1) to have an eosinophilic phenotype, and 1.6% of patients showed a noneosinophilic phenotype (grade 0). Eosinophilic phenotype patients (ie, grades 2 or 3) showed later asthma onset (29.1 years vs 6.7 years; P < .001) and worse lung function (postbronchodilator % predicted FEV
1 , 76.1% vs 89.3%; P = .027) than those with a noneosinophilic phenotype. Patients with noneosinophilic phenotypes were more likely to be women (81.5% vs 62.9%; P = .047), to have eczema (20.8% vs 8.5%; P = .003), and to use anti-IgE (32.1% vs 13.4%; P = .004) and leukotriene receptor antagonists (50.0% vs 28.0%; P = .011) add-on therapy., Interpretation: According to this multicomponent, consensus-driven, and evidence-based eosinophil gradient algorithm (using variables readily accessible in real life), the severe asthma eosinophilic phenotype was more prevalent than previously identified and was phenotypically distinct. This pragmatic gradient algorithm uses variables readily accessible in primary and specialist care, addressing inherent issues of phenotype heterogeneity and phenotype instability. Identification of treatable traits across phenotypes should improve therapeutic precision., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
17. Onset of effect and impact on health-related quality of life, exacerbation rate, lung function, and nasal polyposis symptoms for patients with severe eosinophilic asthma treated with benralizumab (ANDHI): a randomised, controlled, phase 3b trial.
- Author
-
Harrison TW, Chanez P, Menzella F, Canonica GW, Louis R, Cosio BG, Lugogo NL, Mohan A, Burden A, McDermott L, Garcia Gil E, and Zangrilli JG
- Subjects
- Adult, Anti-Asthmatic Agents adverse effects, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized adverse effects, Disease Progression, Double-Blind Method, Eosinophils drug effects, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Reported Outcome Measures, Quality of Life, Spirometry, Anti-Asthmatic Agents administration & dosage, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized administration & dosage, Asthma drug therapy
- Abstract
Background: ANDHI was done to assess the efficacy of benralizumab, including onset of effect and impact on health-related quality of life (HRQOL), exacerbation rate, lung function, and nasal polyposis symptoms., Methods: This phase 3b, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled ANDHI study was completed in adults (aged 18-75 years) with severe eosinophilic asthma with at least 2 exacerbations in the previous year, despite high-dose inhaled corticosteroid plus additional controllers, screening blood eosinophil counts of at least 150 cells per μL, and an Asthma Control Questionnaire 6 (ACQ-6) score of 1·5 or more. Patients who met eligibility criteria were randomly assigned (2:1; stratified by previous exacerbation count [two, or three or more], maintenance oral corticosteroid use, and region), using an integrated web-based response system, to receive benralizumab at 30 mg every 8 weeks (first three doses given 4 weeks apart) or matched placebo for 24 weeks. Primary efficacy measure was annualised asthma exacerbation rate, with rate ratio (RR) calculated over the approximate 24-week follow-up. Secondary efficacy measures included change from baseline to end of treatment (week 24) in St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score (key secondary endpoint), FEV
1 , peak expiratory flow (PEF), ACQ-6, Predominant Symptom and Impairment Assessment (PSIA), Clinician Global Impression of Change (CGI-C), Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C), and Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22). All efficacy analyses, except for SNOT-22, were summarised and analysed using the full analysis set on an intention-to-treat population (all randomly assigned patients receiving investigational product, regardless of protocol adherence or continued participation in the study). SNOT-22 was summarised for the subgroup of patients with physician-diagnosed nasal polyposis with informed consent. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03170271., Findings: Between July 7, 2017, and Sept 25, 2019, 656 patients received benralizumab (n=427) or placebo (n=229). Baseline characteristics were consistent with severe eosinophilic asthma. Benralizumab significantly reduced exacerbation risk by 49% compared with placebo (RR estimate 0·51, 95% CI 0·39-0·65; p<0·0001) over the 24-week treatment period and provided clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvement from baseline to week 24 in SGRQ total score versus placebo (least squares mean change from baseline -8·11 (95% CI -11·41 to -4·82; p<0·0001), with similar differences at earlier timepoints. Benralizumab improved FEV1 , PEF, ACQ-6, CGI-C, PGI-C, PSIA, and SNOT-22 at week 24 versus placebo, with differences observed early (within weeks 1 to 4). Adverse events were reported for 271 (63%) of 427 patients on benralizumab versus 143 (62%) of 229 patients on placebo. The most commonly reported adverse events for the 427 patients receiving benralizumab (frequency >5%) were nasopharyngitis (30 [7%]), headache (37 [9%]), sinusitis (28 [7%]), bronchitis (22 [5%]), and pyrexia (26 [6%]). Fewer serious adverse events were reported for benralizumab (23 [5%]) versus placebo (25 [11%]), and the only common serious adverse event (experienced by >1% of patients) was worsening of asthma, which was reported for nine (2%) patients in the benralizumab group and nine (4%) patients in the placebo group., Interpretation: Our results extend the efficacy profile of benralizumab for patients with severe eosinophilic asthma, showing early clinical benefits in patient-reported outcomes, HRQOL, lung function, and nasal polyposis symptoms., Funding: AstraZeneca., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
18. A Proposed Approach to Chronic Airway Disease (CAD) Using Therapeutic Goals and Treatable Traits: A Look to the Future.
- Author
-
Pérez de Llano L, Miravitlles M, Golpe R, Alvarez-Gutiérrez FJ, Cisneros C, Almonacid C, Martinez-Moragon E, Gonzalez-Barcala FJ, Ramos-Barbón D, Plaza V, Lopez-Campos JL, de-Torres JP, Casanova C, Garcia Rivero JL, Rodriguez Hermosa J, Calle Rubio M, Soler-Cataluña JJ, and Cosio BG
- Subjects
- Goals, Humans, Phenotype, Airway Obstruction, Asthma diagnosis, Asthma drug therapy, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive diagnosis, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive drug therapy
- Abstract
Chronic airflow obstruction affects a wide range of airway diseases, the most frequent of which are asthma, COPD, and bronchiectasis; they are clearly identifiable in their extremes, but quite frequently overlap in some of their pathophysiological and clinical characteristics. This has generated the description of new mixed or overlapping disease phenotypes with no clear biological grounds. In this special article, a group of experts provides their perspective and proposes approaching the treatment of chronic airway disease (CAD) through the identification of a series of therapeutic goals (TG) linked to treatable traits (TT) - understood as clinical, physiological, or biological characteristics that are quantifiable using biomarkers. This therapeutic approach needs validating in a clinical trial with the strategy of identification of TG and treatment according to TT for each patient independently of their prior diagnosis., Competing Interests: Luis Perez de Llano declares to have received grants and/or fees for consultancy or speeches from Novartis, Astra-Zeneca, GSK, Teva, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Chiesi, Sanofi, Menarini, Mundipharma, and Esteve, and reports grants, personal fees, and non-financial support from AstraZeneca, TEVA, and Chiesi, personal fees and non-financial support from GSK, Novartis, Mundipharma and Boehringer, personal fees from Sanofi, other from Menarini, and personal fees from Esteve, BIAL, TECHDOW PHARMA, MSD, and ROVI S.A., outside the submitted work; Marc Miravitlles has received speaking fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Cipla, AstraZeneca, Menarini, Rovi, Bial, Zambon, CSL Behring, Grifols, and Novartis; consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Ferrer, GlaxoSmithKline, Bial, Gebro Pharma, CSL Behring, Laboratorios Esteve, Ferrer, Mereo Biopharma, Verona Pharma, TEVA, pH Pharma, Novartis, and Grifols; and aid for research from GlaxoSmithKline and Grifols, and reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Cipla, Menarini, Rovi, Bial, Sandoz, Zambon, CSL Behring, Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline, Gebro Pharma, Kamada, Laboratorios Esteve, Ferrer, Mereo Biopharma, Verona Pharma, TEVA, Spin Therapeutics, pH Pharma, Sanofi and Grifols, and grants from GlaxoSmithKline and Grifols, outside the submitted work. Rafael Golpe declares that he has received speaking or advisory fees, or economic aid to attend congresses from Astra-Zeneca, GSK, Novartis, Chiesi, Mundipharma, Menarini, TEVA, Grifols, Ferrer, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Rovi, and Gebro. Borja G Cosío declares he has received speaking or advisory fees, or economic aid to attend congresses from Astra-Zeneca, GSK, Novartis, Chiesi, Mundipharma, Menarini, TEVA, Boehringer-Ingelheim, and Rovi and reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Rovi, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Chiesi, Menarini, Rovi, Zambon, Grifols, Novartis, Ferrer, Gebro Pharma, and Laboratorios Esteve, during the conduct of the study. Francisco Javier Alvarez-Gutiérrez declares that in the last 3 years he has received fees for advisory work, lectures, or subsidies to attend congresses and scientific meetings from ALK, AstraZeneca, BIal, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Chiesi, GSK, Menarini, Mundipharma, Novartis, and TEVA. Carolina Cisneros has received speaking fees from AstraZeneca, GSK, TEVA, Menarini, Mundipharma, and Novartis; aid to attend congresses from Chiesi, TEVA, Menarini, and Mundipharma; and fees for advisory work from ALK, AstraZeneca, MundiPharma, TEVA, GSK, and Novartis, and reports grants, personal fees, and non-financial support from AstraZeneca, grants and personal fees from GSK and Novartis, personal fees and non-financial support from TEVA, Menarini, Chiesi and Mundipharma, and personal fees from ALK, outside the submitted work. Carlos Almonacid declares to have received funding in the last 5 years from Astra-zeneca, GSK, Novartis, Chiesi, Mundipharma, Menarini, and TEVA, by way of aid to attend congresses, or as speaking or consulting fees, and reports grants and personal fees from GSK and AstraZeneca, personal fees from ALK, Novartis, Chiesy, and Mundipharma, and non-financial support from Menarini, outside the submitted work. Eva Martinez-Moragon declares to have received funding in the last 5 years from Astra-zeneca, GSK, ALK, Novartis, Chiesi, Mundipharma, Menarini, and TEVA, by way of aid to attend congresses, as speaking fees, or participation in scientific consultancy. Francisco-Javier Gonzalez-Barcala has received speaking fees or research grants from ALK, AstraZeneca, Bial, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Gebro Pharma, GlaxoSmithKline, Laboratorios Esteve, Menarini, Mundipharma, Novartis, Rovi, Roxall, Stallergenes-Greer, and Teva, and reports speaker fees, consulting fees or research grants from ALK, Astra-Zeneca, Bial, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Gebro Pharma, GlaxoSmithKline, Laboratorios Esteve, Menarini, Mundipharma, Novartis, Rovi, Roxall, Stallergenes-Greer and Teva. David Ramos-Barbón reports personal fees from GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca, TEVA Pharmaceuticals, personal fees and non-financial support from Novartis and Chiesi, non-financial support from Boehringer-Ingelheim, and personal fees from BIAL Pharmaceuticals, outside the submitted work. Vicente Plaza declares to have received, in the last 3 years, fees for participating as speaker at meetings sponsored by AstraZeneca, Chiesi, and Novartis, and as a consultant from ALK, AstraZeneca, Bial, Boehringer, MundiPharma, and Sanofi; he received economic aid to attend congresses from AZ, Chiesi, and Novartis; and he received subsidies for research projects from AZ, Chiesi, and Menarini; and reports grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca and Chiesi, grants from Menarini, and personal fees from Sanofi, Mundipharma, Boehringer-Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, and Merck, outside the submitted work. Jose Luis López-Campos has received fees, in the last 3 years, for giving lectures, scientific consultancy, participation in clinical studies, or writing papers for (alphabetical order): AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, CSL Behring, Esteve, Ferrer, Gebro, GlaxoSmithKline, Grifols, Menarini, Novartis, Rovi, and Teva, and reports personal fees and non-financial support from AstraZeneca, grants, personal fees, and non-financial support from Boehringer, Chiesi, GSK, Grifols, Menarini, and Novartis, personal fees from CSL Behring, Esteve, and Ferrer, grants and personal fees from GebroPharma, and personal fees from Rovi and Teva, outside the submitted work. Ciro Casanova has received fees for giving lectures, scientific consultancy, participation in clinical studies, or writing papers for (alphabetical order): AstraZeneca, Bial, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Esteve, Gebro, GlaxoSmithKline, Menarini, Novartis, Rovi, and Teva, and reports non-financial support from Astra-Zeneca, personal fees from Bial, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Chiesi, Esteve, and Novartis, personal fees and non-financial support from GSK, and grants and non-financial support from Menarini, outside the submitted work. Juan Luis Rodriguez Hermosa has received speaking fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and Gebro Pharma and reports personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Grifols, Gebro, and Glaxo, outside the submitted work. Myriam Calle Rubio has received speaking fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Menarini, and Novartis; and consulting fees from GlaxoSmith¬Kline, Gebro Pharma, and Novartis, and reports personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Menarini, Novartis, Gebro, Glaxo, and AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work. JJ Soler-Cataluña declares to have received fees for giving lectures, scientific consultancy, or participation in clinical studies on behalf of Air Liquide, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Esteve, Ferrer, GSK, Menarini, Mundipharma, Novartis, Rovi, Sandoz, and Teva and reports grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca, Chiesi, and GSK, grants, personal fees, and non-financial support from Boehringer-Ingelheim and Novartis, and personal fees from Bial, Ferrer, Rovi, and Teva, outside the submitted work. Borja G Cosio reports grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca, Chiesi, and GSK, personal fees from Novartis, personal fees and non-financial support from Mundipharma, and grants from Menarini, Teva, Boehringer-Ingelheim, and Rovi, outside the submitted work. The rest of the authors declare they have no conflict of interests for this work. The rest of the authors declare they have no conflict of interests for this work., (© 2020 Pérez de Llano et al.)
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
19. International severe asthma registry (ISAR): protocol for a global registry.
- Author
-
FitzGerald JM, Tran TN, Alacqua M, Altraja A, Backer V, Bjermer L, Bjornsdottir U, Bourdin A, Brusselle G, Bulathsinhala L, Busby J, Canonica GW, Carter V, Chaudhry I, Cho YS, Christoff G, Cosio BG, Costello RW, Eleangovan N, Gibson PG, Heaney LG, Heffler E, Hew M, Hosseini N, Iwanaga T, Jackson DJ, Jones R, Koh MS, Le T, Lehtimäki L, Ludviksdottir D, Maitland-van der Zee AH, Menzies-Gow A, Murray RB, Papadopoulos NG, Perez-de-Llano L, Peters M, Pfeffer PE, Popov TA, Porsbjerg CM, Price CA, Rhee CK, Sadatsafavi M, Tohda Y, Wang E, Wechsler ME, Zangrilli J, and Price DB
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Adult, Humans, Registries, Asthma diagnosis, Asthma drug therapy, Asthma epidemiology
- Abstract
Background: Severe asthma exerts a disproportionately heavy burden on patients and health care. Due to the heterogeneity of the severe asthma population, many patients need to be evaluated to understand the clinical features and outcomes of severe asthma in order to facilitate personalised and targeted care. The International Severe Asthma Registry (ISAR) is a multi-country registry project initiated to aid in this endeavour., Methods: ISAR is a multi-disciplinary initiative benefitting from the combined experience of the ISAR Steering Committee (ISC; comprising 47 clinicians and researchers across 29 countries, who have a special interest and/or experience in severe asthma management or establishment and maintenance of severe asthma registries) in collaboration with scientists and experts in database management and communication. Patients (≥18 years old) receiving treatment according to the 2018 definitions of the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) Step 5 or uncontrolled on GINA Step 4 treatment will be included. Data will be collected on a core set of 95 variables identified using the Delphi method. Participating registries will agree to provide access to and share standardised anonymous patient-level data with ISAR. ISAR is a registered data source on the European Network of Centres for Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacovigilance. ISAR's collaborators include Optimum Patient Care, the Respiratory Effectiveness Group (REG) and AstraZeneca. ISAR is overseen by the ISC, REG, the Anonymised Data Ethics & Protocol Transparency Committee and the ISAR operational committee, ensuring the conduct of ethical, clinically relevant research that brings value to all key stakeholders., Conclusions: ISAR aims to offer a rich source of real-life data for scientific research to understand and improve disease burden, treatment patterns and patient outcomes in severe asthma. Furthermore, the registry will provide an international platform for research collaboration in respiratory medicine, with the overarching aim of improving primary and secondary care of adults with severe asthma globally.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
20. Development of the International Severe Asthma Registry (ISAR): A Modified Delphi Study.
- Author
-
Bulathsinhala L, Eleangovan N, Heaney LG, Menzies-Gow A, Gibson PG, Peters M, Hew M, van Boven JFM, Lehtimäki L, van Ganse E, Belhassen M, Harvey ES, Perez de Llano L, Maitland-van der Zee AH, Papadopoulos NG, FitzGerald JM, Porsbjerg C, Canonica GW, Backer V, Rhee CK, Verhamme KMC, Buhl R, Cosio BG, Carter V, Price C, Le T, Stagno d'Alcontres M, Gopalan G, Tran TN, and Price D
- Subjects
- Consensus, Delphi Technique, Female, Humans, Internationality, Male, Specialization, Asthma, Registries
- Abstract
Background: The lack of centralized data on severe asthma has resulted in a scarcity of information about the disease and its management. The development of a common data collection tool for the International Severe Asthma Registry (ISAR) will enable standardized data collection, subsequently enabling data interoperability., Objectives: To create a standardized list of variables for the first international registry for severe asthma via expert consensus., Methods: A modified Delphi process was used to reach consensus on a minimum set of variables to capture in ISAR: the core variables. The Delphi panel brought together 27 international experts in the field of severe asthma research. The process consisted of 3 iterative rounds. In each round, all Delphi panel members were issued an electronic ISAR Delphi workbook to complete and return to the ISAR Delphi administrator. Workbooks and result summaries were anonymously distributed by the Delphi administrator to all panel members at subsequent rounds. Finalization of the core variable list was facilitated by 2 face-to-face meetings., Results: Of the initial 747 selected variables, the Delphi panel reached a consensus on 95. The chosen variables will allow severe asthma to be assessed against patient demographics and medical history, patient-reported outcomes, diagnostic information, and clinical characteristics. Physician-reported outcomes such as nonadherence and information about treatment and management strategies will also be recorded., Conclusions: This is the first global attempt to generate an ISAR using a common set of core variables to ensure that data collected across all participating countries are standardized., (Copyright © 2018 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
21. The Role of FE NO in the Diagnosis and Control of Asthma. Expert Multidisciplinary Group Debate during the Asthma Meeting Point 2017.
- Author
-
Plaza V, Cosio BG, Entrenas LM, Olaguíbel JM, Pérez de Llano L, and Quirce S
- Subjects
- Asthma metabolism, Congresses as Topic, Electrochemical Techniques, Humans, Interdisciplinary Communication, Luminescent Measurements, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Spirometry, Surveys and Questionnaires, Asthma diagnosis, Breath Tests methods, Nitric Oxide analysis
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
22. Asthma-COPD overlap is not a homogeneous disorder: further supporting data.
- Author
-
Pérez-de-Llano L and Cosio BG
- Subjects
- Aged, Asthma classification, Cross-Sectional Studies, Eosinophils metabolism, Female, Forced Expiratory Volume physiology, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive classification, Asthma blood, Asthma diagnosis, Inflammation Mediators blood, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive blood, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive diagnosis
- Abstract
Asthma-COPD ovelap (ACO) is an umbrella term that encompasses patients with COPD and eosinophilic inflammation (e-COPD) and smoking asthmatics with non-fully reversible airflow obstruction (SA). We compared the clinical characteristics and the inflammatory profile of e-COPD and SA. Patients classified as e-COPD were older and more often male and showed significantly impaired pulmonary function (likely explained by a heavier smoking habit). On the contrary, SA had more atopic features, more reversibility of airflow obstruction and higher IgE levels. The concentrations of IL-5, IL-13, IL-8, IL-6, TNF-α, IL17 in serum were similar between the 2 groups. However, Th2-related biomarkers (periostin, FeNO and blood eosinophils) shower higher median values in e-COPD patients. Our findings reinforce the notion that ACO is a heterogeneous disorder and, as a consequence, it might be unacceptable to offer the same treatment for two related but different conditions.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
23. Test of Adherence to Inhalers.
- Author
-
Plaza V, López-Viña A, and Cosio BG
- Subjects
- Administration, Inhalation, Humans, Nebulizers and Vaporizers, Psychometrics, Asthma drug therapy, Bronchodilator Agents administration & dosage, Medication Adherence, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive drug therapy, Surveys and Questionnaires
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
24. Algorithm for identification of asthma-COPD overlap: consensus between the Spanish COPD and asthma guidelines.
- Author
-
Miravitlles M, Alvarez-Gutierrez FJ, Calle M, Casanova C, Cosio BG, López-Viña A, Pérez de Llano L, Quirce S, Roman-Rodríguez M, Soler-Cataluña JJ, and Plaza V
- Subjects
- Asthma complications, Humans, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive complications, Societies, Medical, United States, Algorithms, Asthma diagnosis, Consensus, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive diagnosis
- Abstract
Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: Disclosures can be found alongside this article at erj.ersjournals.com
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
25. Differences in Adherence and Non-Adherence Behaviour Patterns to Inhaler Devices Between COPD and Asthma Patients.
- Author
-
Plaza V, López-Viña A, Entrenas LM, Fernández-Rodríguez C, Melero C, Pérez-Llano L, Gutiérrez-Pereyra F, Tarragona E, Palomino R, and Cosio BG
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cross-Sectional Studies, Employment, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nebulizers and Vaporizers, Risk Factors, Surveys and Questionnaires, Volition, Young Adult, Asthma drug therapy, Medication Adherence statistics & numerical data, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive drug therapy
- Abstract
Differences between COPD and asthma may also differentially affect adherence to inhaled drugs in each disease. We aimed to determine differences in behaviour patterns of adherence and non-adherence to inhaled therapy between patients with COPD and patients with asthma using the Test of Adherence to Inhalers (TAI) questionnaire. A total of 910 patients (55% with asthma, 45% with COPD) participated in a cross-sectional multicentre study. Data recorded included sociodemographics, education level, asthma or COPD history, TAI score, the Asthma Control Test (ACT), the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) and spirometry. Asthma patients were statistically significant less adherents, 140 (28%) vs. 201 (49%), and the pattern of non-adherence was more frequently erratic (66.8% vs. 47.8%) and deliberate (47.2% vs. 34.1%) than COPD patients; however unwitting non-adherence was more frequently observed in COPD group (31.2% vs. 22.8%). Moreover, taking together all sample studied, only being younger than 50 years of age (OR 1.88 [95% CI: 1.26-2.81]) and active working status (OR 1.45 [95% CI: 1.00-2.09]) were risk factors for non-adherence in the multivariate analysis, while having asthma remained in the limits of the significance (OR 1.44 [95%CI: 0.97-2.14]). Even though non-adherence to inhalers is more frequently observed in asthma than in COPD patients and exhibited a different non-adherence patterns, these differences are more likely to be related to sociodemographic characteristics. However, differences in non-adherence patterns should be considered when designing specific education programmes tailored to each disease.
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
26. Defining the Asthma-COPD Overlap Syndrome in a COPD Cohort.
- Author
-
Cosio BG, Soriano JB, López-Campos JL, Calle-Rubio M, Soler-Cataluna JJ, de-Torres JP, Marín JM, Martínez-Gonzalez C, de Lucas P, Mir I, Peces-Barba G, Feu-Collado N, Solanes I, Alfageme I, and Casanova C
- Subjects
- Aged, Asthma drug therapy, Bronchodilator Agents therapeutic use, Cohort Studies, Eosinophils, Female, Forced Expiratory Volume, Humans, Leukocyte Count, Male, Middle Aged, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive drug therapy, Syndrome, Asthma complications, Asthma diagnosis, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive complications, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive diagnosis
- Abstract
Background: Asthma-COPD overlap syndrome (ACOS) has been recently described by international guidelines. A stepwise approach to diagnosis using usual features of both diseases is recommended although its clinical application is difficult., Methods: To identify patients with ACOS, a cohort of well-characterized patients with COPD and up to 1 year of follow-up was analyzed. We evaluated the presence of specific characteristics associated with asthma in this COPD cohort, divided into major criteria (bronchodilator test > 400 mL and 15% and past medical history of asthma) and minor criteria (blood eosinophils > 5%, IgE > 100 IU/mL, or two separate bronchodilator tests > 200 mL and 12%). We defined ACOS by the presence of one major criterion or two minor criteria. Baseline characteristics, health status (COPD Assessment Test [CAT]), BMI, airflow obstruction, dyspnea, and exercise capacity (BODE) index, rate of exacerbations, and mortality up to 1 year of follow-up were compared between patients with and without criteria for ACOS., Results: Of 831 patients with COPD included,125 (15%) fulfilled the criteria for ACOS, and 98.4% of them sustained these criteria after 1 year. Patients with ACOS were predominantly male (81.6%), with symptomatic mild to moderate disease (67%), who were receiving inhaled corticosteroids (63.2%). There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics, and only survival was worse in patients with non-ACOS COPD after 1 year of follow-up (P < .05)., Conclusions: The proposed ACOS criteria are present in 15% of a cohort of patients with COPD and these patients show better 1-year prognosis than clinically similar patients with COPD with no ACOS criteria., Trial Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT01122758; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov., (Copyright © 2016 American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
27. What pulmonologists think about the asthma-COPD overlap syndrome.
- Author
-
Miravitlles M, Alcázar B, Alvarez FJ, Bazús T, Calle M, Casanova C, Cisneros C, de-Torres JP, Entrenas LM, Esteban C, García-Sidro P, Cosio BG, Huerta A, Iriberri M, Izquierdo JL, López-Viña A, López-Campos JL, Martínez-Moragón E, Pérez de Llano L, Perpiñá M, Ros JA, Serrano J, Soler-Cataluña JJ, Torrego A, Urrutia I, and Plaza V
- Subjects
- Adrenal Cortex Hormones therapeutic use, Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists therapeutic use, Anti-Asthmatic Agents therapeutic use, Bronchodilator Agents therapeutic use, Consensus, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Prognosis, Risk Factors, Smoking adverse effects, Spain epidemiology, Specialization, Surveys and Questionnaires, Asthma diagnosis, Asthma epidemiology, Asthma physiopathology, Asthma therapy, Attitude of Health Personnel, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive diagnosis, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive epidemiology, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive physiopathology, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive therapy, Pulmonary Medicine
- Abstract
Background: Some patients with COPD may share characteristics of asthma; this is the so-called asthma-COPD overlap syndrome (ACOS). There are no universally accepted criteria for ACOS, and most treatments for asthma and COPD have not been adequately tested in this population., Materials and Methods: We performed a survey among pulmonology specialists in asthma and COPD aimed at collecting their opinions about ACOS and their attitudes in regard to some case scenarios of ACOS patients. The participants answered a structured questionnaire and attended a face-to-face meeting with the Metaplan methodology to discuss different aspects of ACOS., Results: A total of 26 pulmonologists with a mean age of 49.7 years participated in the survey (13 specialists in asthma and 13 in COPD). Among these, 84.6% recognized the existence of ACOS and stated that a mean of 12.6% of their patients might have this syndrome. In addition, 80.8% agreed that the diagnostic criteria for ACOS are not yet well defined. The most frequently mentioned characteristics of ACOS were a history of asthma (88.5%), significant smoking exposure (73.1%), and postbronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second/forced vital capacity <0.7 (69.2%). The most accepted diagnostic criteria were eosinophilia in sputum (80.8%), a very positive bronchodilator test (69.2%), and a history of asthma before 40 years of age (65.4%). Up to 96.2% agreed that first-line treatment for ACOS was the combination of a long-acting β2-agonist and inhaled steroid, with a long-acting antimuscarinic agent (triple therapy) for severe ACOS., Conclusion: Most Spanish specialists in asthma and COPD agree that ACOS exists, but the diagnostic criteria are not yet well defined. A previous history of asthma, smoking, and not fully reversible airflow limitation are considered the main characteristics of ACOS, with the most accepted first-line treatment being long-acting β2-agonist/inhaled corticosteroids.
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
28. NEXThaler, an innovative dry powder inhaler delivering an extrafine fixed combination of beclometasone and formoterol to treat large and small airways in asthma.
- Author
-
Corradi M, Chrystyn H, Cosio BG, Pirozynski M, Loukides S, Louis R, Spinola M, and Usmani OS
- Subjects
- Administration, Inhalation, Anti-Asthmatic Agents administration & dosage, Anti-Asthmatic Agents pharmacokinetics, Asthma physiopathology, Beclomethasone pharmacokinetics, Drug Combinations, Drug Delivery Systems, Dry Powder Inhalers, Ethanolamines pharmacokinetics, Formoterol Fumarate, Humans, Lung metabolism, Particle Size, Asthma drug therapy, Beclomethasone administration & dosage, Ethanolamines administration & dosage
- Abstract
Introduction: Airway inflammation and remodelling in asthma occur in the large airways and also in the small airways. The small airways are those < 2 mm in diameter and are significant sites of chronic asthmatic inflammation. It is important, therefore, to target the small as well as the large airways in any strategy for effective treatment of this disease., Areas Covered: The present review deals with the recently developed fixed dose drug combination of beclometasone dipropionate/formoterol fumarate that emits extrafine particles when delivered from an innovative dry powder inhaler (DPI), NEXThaler®. The aim is to present the technical and clinical aspects of aerosolized drug delivery to the lungs., Expert Opinion: The data show that the NEXThaler DPI is an efficient device for the management of persistent asthma. The evaluation of the inhalation profiles through the NEXThaler DPI demonstrates that device activation and consistent dose delivery occurs at patient achievable inhalation flow rates, and supports the broad utility of the NEXThaler DPI in patients with asthma. Overall, all the effectiveness, efficiency and satisfaction outcomes demonstrate the NEXThaler DPI is easy to use.
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
29. Eosinophilic and Noneosinophilic Asthma: An Expert Consensus Framework to Characterize Phenotypes in a Global Real-Life Severe Asthma Cohort
- Author
-
Heaney, Liam G., Perez de Llano, Luis, Al-Ahmad, Mona, Backer, Vibeke, Busby, John, Canonica, Giorgio Walter, Christoff, George C., Cosio, Borja G., FitzGerald, J. Mark, Heffler, Enrico, Iwanaga, Takashi, Jackson, David J., Menzies-Gow, Andrew N., Papadopoulos, Nikolaos G., Papaioannou, Andriana I., Pfeffer, Paul E., Popov, Todor A., Porsbjerg, Celeste M., Rhee, Chin Kook, Sadatsafavi, Mohsen, Tohda, Yuji, Wang, Eileen, Wechsler, Michael E., Alacqua, Marianna, Altraja, Alan, Bjermer, Leif, Björnsdóttir, Unnur S., Bourdin, Arnaud, Brusselle, Guy G., Buhl, Roland, Costello, Richard W., Hew, Mark, Koh, Mariko Siyue, Lehmann, Sverre, Lehtimäki, Lauri, Peters, Matthew, Taillé, Camille, Taube, Christian, Tran, Trung N., Zangrilli, James, Bulathsinhala, Lakmini, Carter, Victoria A., Chaudhry, Isha, Eleangovan, Neva, Hosseini, Naeimeh, Kerkhof, Marjan, Murray, Ruth B., Price, Chris A., Price, David B., Physiologie & médecine expérimentale du Cœur et des Muscles [U 1046] (PhyMedExp), Université de Montpellier (UM)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [Montpellier] (CHRU Montpellier), Epidemiology, Tampere University, Department of Respiratory medicine, Dermatology and Allergology, and Clinical Medicine
- Subjects
PROTOCOL ,Adult ,Male ,Asia ,[SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio] ,Medizin ,3121 Internal medicine ,Global Health ,Severity of Illness Index ,VALIDATION ,International Severe Asthma Registry ,MECHANISMS ,Cohort Studies ,Leukocyte Count ,Middle East ,Adrenal Cortex Hormones ,Eosinophilia ,Medicine and Health Sciences ,Prevalence ,Humans ,Anti-Asthmatic Agents ,Registries ,Age of Onset ,PREDICTORS ,ComputingMilieux_MISCELLANEOUS ,RECEPTOR ,BENRALIZUMAB ,Middle Aged ,Asthma ,Patient Care Management ,Respiratory Function Tests ,Eosinophils ,Europe ,Biological Variation, Population ,North America ,Female ,FENO - Abstract
Background: Phenotypic characteristics of patients with eosinophilic and noneosinophilic asthma are not well characterized in global, real-life severe asthma cohorts. Research Question: What is the prevalence of eosinophilic and noneosinophilic phenotypes in the population with severe asthma, and can these phenotypes be differentiated by clinical and biomarker variables? Study Design and Methods: This was an historical registry study. Adult patients with severe asthma and available blood eosinophil count (BEC) from 11 countries enrolled in the International Severe Asthma Registry (January 1, 2015-September 30, 2019) were categorized according to likelihood of eosinophilic phenotype using a predefined gradient eosinophilic algorithm based on highest BEC, long-term oral corticosteroid use, elevated fractional exhaled nitric oxide, nasal polyps, and adult-onset asthma. Demographic and clinical characteristics were defined at baseline (ie, 1 year before or closest to date of BEC). Results: One thousand seven hundred sixteen patients with prospective data were included; 83.8% were identified as most likely (grade 3), 8.3% were identified as likely (grade 2), and 6.3% identified as least likely (grade 1) to have an eosinophilic phenotype, and 1.6% of patients showed a noneosinophilic phenotype (grade 0). Eosinophilic phenotype patients (ie, grades 2 or 3) showed later asthma onset (29.1 years vs 6.7 years; P < .001) and worse lung function (postbronchodilator % predicted FEV1, 76.1% vs 89.3%; P = .027) than those with a noneosinophilic phenotype. Patients with noneosinophilic phenotypes were more likely to be women (81.5% vs 62.9%; P = .047), to have eczema (20.8% vs 8.5%; P = .003), and to use anti-IgE (32.1% vs 13.4%; P = .004) and leukotriene receptor antagonists (50.0% vs 28.0%; P = .011) add-on therapy. Interpretation: According to this multicomponent, consensus-driven, and evidence-based eosinophil gradient algorithm (using variables readily accessible in real life), the severe asthma eosinophilic phenotype was more prevalent than previously identified and was phenotypically distinct. This pragmatic gradient algorithm uses variables readily accessible in primary and specialist care, addressing inherent issues of phenotype heterogeneity and phenotype instability. Identification of treatable traits across phenotypes should improve therapeutic precision. publishedVersion
- Published
- 2021
30. Onset of effect and impact on health-related quality of life, exacerbation rate, lung function, and nasal polyposis symptoms for patients with severe eosinophilic asthma treated with benralizumab (ANDHI): a randomised, controlled, phase 3b trial
- Author
-
Harrison, Tim W, Chanez, Pascal, Menzella, Francesco, Canonica, Giorgio Walter, Louis, Renaud, Cosio, Borja G, Lugogo, Njira L, Mohan, Arjun, Burden, Annie, McDermott, Lawrence, Garcia Gil, Esther, Zangrilli, James G, Wolfgang Pohl, Robert Voves, Maud Deschampheleire, Renaud Louis, Jean-Benoit Martinot, Rudi Peché, Kenneth Chapman, Amarjit Cheema, Delbert Dorscheid, J Mark FitzGerald, Remi Gagnon, William Patrick Killorn, Ronald Olivenstein, George Philteos, Clare Ramsey, J Douglass Rolf, Brandie Walker, Ole Hilberg, Tina Skjold, Ingrid Titlestad, Auli Hakulinen, Maritta Kilpeläinen, Michèle Ben Hayoun, Philippe Bonniaud, Arnaud Bourdin, Pascal Chanez, Frédéric De Blay, Gaëtan Deslee, Gilles Devouassoux, Alain Didier, Youcef Douadi, Stéphanie Fry, Gilles Garcia, Pierre-Olivier Girodet, Christophe Leroyer, Antoine Magnan, Guillaume Mahay, Cécilia Nocent, Christophe Pison, Pauline-Marie Roux, Camille Taillé, Juliana-Angelica Tiotiu, Ekkehard Beck, Margret Jandl, Christian Kaehler, Frank Kässner, Frank Koesters, Juliane Kronsbein, Thomas Schaum, Christian Schulz, Dirk Skowasch, Christian Taube, Tobias Welte, Andrés de Roux, Bianca Beghé, Francesco Blasi, Giorgio Walter Canonica, Giovanna Carpagnano, Cristiano Caruso, Angelo Guido Corsico, Elio Constantino, Nunzio Crimi, Piero Maestrelli, Francesco Menzella, Manlio Milanese, Alberto Papi, Girolamo Pelaia, Laura Pini, Pierachille Santus, Eleonora Savi, Nicola Scichilone, Gianenrico Senna, Giuseppe Spadaro, Adriano Vaghi, Steven Gans, Jurgen Hölters, B Langeveld, Willem Pieters, G H A Staaks, Ilonka van Veen, J W K van den Berg, Gunnar Einvik, Sverre Lehmann, Ismael Ali García, Carlos Almonacid, Irina Bobolea, Paloma Campo Mozo, Gustavo de Luiz, Christian Domingo Ribas, José María Echave-Sustaeta María-Tomé, Juan Luis García Rivero, Borja García-Cosío Piqueras, Ana Gómez-Bastero Fernández, Ruperto González Pérez, Aythamy Henríquez Santa, Carlos Martínez Rivera, Xavier Muñoz Gall, Jacinto Ramos, Jose Gregorio Soto Campos, Carmen Vidal Pan, Nikolai Stenfors, Alf Tunsäter, Ines Vinge, Rekha Chaudhuri, Timothy Harrison, Adel Mansur, Shuaib Nasser, Monica Nordstrom, Paul Pfeffer, Dinesh Saralaya, Philip Short, Arun Adlakha, Oral Alpan, Francis Averill, Anil Badhwar, Jose Bardelas, Barbara Baxter, George Bensch, William Berger, Jonathan Bernstein, Tracy Bridges, Ryan Brimeyer, William Calhoun, Edward Campbell, William Brett Cherry, Geoffrey Chupp, Lee Clore, John Cohn, Jeremy Cole, John Condemi, James Cury, Benjamin Davis, Samuel DeLeon, Luis Delacruz, Joseph Diaz, David Erb, Emeka Eziri, Faisal Fakih, Douglas Fiedler, David Fost, Stephen Fritz, Erika Gonzalez, Brad Goodman, Peter Gottlieb, Gregory Gottschlich, Richard Gower, Rizan Hajal, James Harris, Hengameh Heidarian-Raissy, Albrecht Heyder, David Hill, Fernando Holguin, Iftikhar Hussain, Jonathan Illowite, Joshua Jacobs, Mikell Jarratt, Harold Kaiser, Neil Kao, Ravindra Kashyap, David Kaufman, Edward Kent, Kenneth Kim, Ryan Klein, Monica Kraft, Ritsu Kono, Shahrukh Kureishy, Jeffrey Leflein, Mila Leong, Huamin Li, Robert Lin, Njira Lugogo, Michael Marcus, Diego Jose Maselli Caceres, Vinay Mehta, Curtis Mello, Mark Millard, Aaron Milstone, Arjun Mohan, Wendy Moore, Mark Moss, Nayla Mumneh, Thomas O'Brien, David Ostransky, Michael Palumbo, Purvi Parikh, Sudhir Parikh, Amit Patel, Guido Perez, Warren Pleskow, Bruce Prenner, Dileep Puppala, John Ramey, Joan Reibman, Ramon Reyes, Emory Robinette, Ileana Rodicio, Stephen Ryan, Sudhir Sekhsaria, Barry Sigal, Vinay Sikand, Weily Soong, Selwyn Spangenthal, Roy St John, Gary Steven, Vijay Subramaniam, Kaharu Sumino, Eric Sztejman, Ricardo A Tan, Tonny Tanus, Charles Thompson, Carl Thornblade, Manuel Villareal, Sally Wenzel, Heidi Zafra, Tomasz Ziedalski, Centre recherche en CardioVasculaire et Nutrition = Center for CardioVascular and Nutrition research (C2VN), Aix Marseille Université (AMU)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), Physiologie & médecine expérimentale du Cœur et des Muscles [U 1046] (PhyMedExp), Université de Montpellier (UM)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [Montpellier] (CHRU Montpellier), Pathologies Pulmonaires et Plasticité Cellulaire - UMR-S 1250 (P3CELL), Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne (URCA)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Tim W, Harrison, Pascal, Chanez, Francesco, Menzella, Giorgio Walter, Canonica, Renaud, Loui, Borja G, Cosio, Njira L, Lugogo, Arjun, Mohan, Annie, Burden, Lawrence, Mcdermott, Esther, Garcia Gil, Zangrilli, G, Jame, Pohl, Wolfgang, Voves, Robert, Deschampheleire, Maud, Louis, Renaud, Martinot, Jean-Benoit, Peché, Rudi, Chapman, Kenneth, Cheema, Amarjit, Dorscheid, Delbert, Mark FitzGerald, J, Gagnon, Remi, Patrick Killorn, William, Olivenstein, Ronald, Philteos, George, Ramsey, Clare, Douglass Rolf, J, Walker, Brandie, Hilberg, Ole, Skjold, Tina, Titlestad, Ingrid, Hakulinen, Auli, Kilpeläinen, Maritta, Ben Hayoun, Michèle, Bonniaud, Philippe, Bourdin, Arnaud, Chanez, Pascal, De Blay, Frédéric, Deslee, Gaëtan, Devouassoux, Gille, Didier, Alain, Douadi, Youcef, Fry, Stéphanie, Garcia, Gille, Girodet, Pierre-Olivier, Leroyer, Christophe, Magnan, Antoine, Mahay, Guillaume, Nocent, Cécilia, Pison, Christophe, Roux, Pauline-Marie, Taillé, Camille, Tiotiu, Juliana-Angelica, Beck, Ekkehard, Jandl, Margret, Kaehler, Christian, Kässner, Frank, Koesters, Frank, Kronsbein, Juliane, Schaum, Thoma, Schulz, Christian, Skowasch, Dirk, Taube, Christian, Welte, Tobia, de Roux, André, Beghé, Bianca, Blasi, Francesco, Walter Canonica, Giorgio, Carpagnano, Giovanna, Caruso, Cristiano, Guido Corsico, Angelo, Constantino, Elio, Crimi, Nunzio, Maestrelli, Piero, Menzella, Francesco, Milanese, Manlio, Papi, Alberto, Pelaia, Girolamo, Pini, Laura, Santus, Pierachille, Savi, Eleonora, Scichilone, Nicola, Senna, Gianenrico, Spadaro, Giuseppe, Vaghi, Adriano, Gans, Steven, Hölters, Jurgen, Langeveld, B, Pieters, Willem, A Staaks, G H, van Veen, Ilonka, K van den Berg, J W, Einvik, Gunnar, Lehmann, Sverre, Ali García, Ismael, Almonacid, Carlo, Bobolea, Irina, Campo Mozo, Paloma, de Luiz, Gustavo, Domingo Ribas, Christian, María Echave-Sustaeta María-Tomé, José, Luis García Rivero, Juan, García-Cosío Piqueras, Borja, Gómez-Bastero Fernández, Ana, González Pérez, Ruperto, Henríquez Santa, Aythamy, Martínez Rivera, Carlo, Muñoz Gall, Xavier, Ramos, Jacinto, Gregorio Soto Campos, Jose, Vidal Pan, Carmen, Stenfors, Nikolai, Tunsäter, Alf, Vinge, Ine, Chaudhuri, Rekha, Harrison, Timothy, Mansur, Adel, Nasser, Shuaib, Nordstrom, Monica, Pfeffer, Paul, Saralaya, Dinesh, Short, Philip, Adlakha, Arun, Alpan, Oral, Averill, Franci, Badhwar, Anil, Bardelas, Jose, Baxter, Barbara, Bensch, George, Berger, William, Bernstein, Jonathan, Bridges, Tracy, Brimeyer, Ryan, Calhoun, William, Campbell, Edward, Brett Cherry, William, Chupp, Geoffrey, Clore, Lee, Cohn, John, Cole, Jeremy, Condemi, John, Cury, Jame, Davis, Benjamin, Deleon, Samuel, Delacruz, Lui, Diaz, Joseph, Erb, David, Eziri, Emeka, Fakih, Faisal, Fiedler, Dougla, Fost, David, Fritz, Stephen, Gonzalez, Erika, Goodman, Brad, Gottlieb, Peter, Gottschlich, Gregory, Gower, Richard, Hajal, Rizan, Harris, Jame, Heidarian-Raissy, Hengameh, Heyder, Albrecht, Hill, DAVID STANLEY, Holguin, Fernando, Hussain, Iftikhar, Illowite, Jonathan, Jacobs, Joshua, Jarratt, Mikell, Kaiser, Harold, Kao, Neil, Kashyap, Ravindra, Kaufman, David, Kent, Edward, Kim, Kenneth, Klein, Ryan, Kraft, Monica, Kono, Ritsu, Kureishy, Shahrukh, Leflein, Jeffrey, Leong, Mila, Li, Huamin, Lin, Robert, Lugogo, Njira, Marcus, Michael, Jose Maselli Caceres, Diego, Mehta, Vinay, Mello, Curti, Millard, Mark, Milstone, Aaron, Mohan, Arjun, Moore, Wendy, Moss, Mark, Mumneh, Nayla, O'Brien, Thoma, Ostransky, David, Palumbo, Michael, Parikh, Purvi, Parikh, Sudhir, Patel, Amit, Perez, Guido, Pleskow, Warren, Prenner, Bruce, Puppala, Dileep, Ramey, John, Reibman, Joan, Reyes, Ramon, Robinette, Emory, Rodicio, Ileana, Ryan, Stephen, Sekhsaria, Sudhir, Sigal, Barry, Sikand, Vinay, Soong, Weily, Spangenthal, Selwyn, St John, Roy, Gary, Steven, Subramaniam, Vijay, Sumino, Kaharu, Sztejman, Eric, A Tan, Ricardo, Tanus, Tonny, Thompson, Charle, Thornblade, Carl, Villareal, Manuel, Wenzel, Sally, Zafra, Heidi, Ziedalski, Tomasz, UCL - SSS/IREC/MONT - Pôle Mont Godinne, UCL - (MGD) Service de pneumologie, Harrison T.W., Chanez P., Menzella F., Canonica G.W., Louis R., Cosio B.G., Lugogo N.L., Mohan A., Burden A., McDermott L., Garcia Gil E., Zangrilli J.G., Pohl W., Voves R., Deschampheleire M., Martinot J.-B., Peche R., Chapman K., Cheema A., Dorscheid D., FitzGerald J.M., Gagnon R., Killorn W.P., Olivenstein R., Philteos G., Ramsey C., Rolf J.D., Walker B., Hilberg O., Skjold T., Titlestad I., Hakulinen A., Kilpelainen M., Ben Hayoun M., Bonniaud P., Bourdin A., De Blay F., Deslee G., Devouassoux G., Didier A., Douadi Y., Fry S., Garcia G., Girodet P.-O., Leroyer C., Magnan A., Mahay G., Nocent C., Pison C., Roux P.-M., Taille C., Tiotiu J.-A., Beck E., Jandl M., Kaehler C., Kassner F., Koesters F., Kronsbein J., Schaum T., Schulz C., Skowasch D., Taube C., Welte T., de Roux A., Beghe B., Blasi F., Carpagnano G., Caruso C., Corsico A.G., Constantino E., Crimi N., Maestrelli P., Milanese M., Papi A., Pelaia G., Pini L., Santus P., Savi E., Scichilone N., Senna G., Spadaro G., Vaghi A., Gans S., Holters J., Langeveld B., Pieters W., Staaks G.H.A., van Veen I., van den Berg J.W.K., Einvik G., Lehmann S., Ali Garcia I., Almonacid C., Bobolea I., Campo Mozo P., de Luiz G., Domingo Ribas C., Echave-Sustaeta Maria-Tome J.M., Garcia Rivero J.L., Garcia-Cosio Piqueras B., Gomez-Bastero Fernandez A., Gonzalez Perez R., Henriquez Santa A., Martinez Rivera C., Munoz Gall X., Ramos J., Gregorio Soto Campos J., Vidal Pan C., Stenfors N., Tunsater A., Vinge I., Chaudhuri R., Harrison T., Mansur A., Nasser S., Nordstrom M., Pfeffer P., Saralaya D., Short P., Adlakha A., Alpan O., Averill F., Badhwar A., Bardelas J., Baxter B., Bensch G., Berger W., Bernstein J., Bridges T., Brimeyer R., Calhoun W., Campbell E., Cherry W.B., Chupp G., Clore L., Cohn J., Cole J., Condemi J., Cury J., Davis B., DeLeon S., Delacruz L., Diaz J., Erb D., Eziri E., Fakih F., Fiedler D., Fost D., Fritz S., Gonzalez E., Goodman B., Gottlieb P., Gottschlich G., Gower R., Hajal R., Harris J., Heidarian-Raissy H., Heyder A., Hill D., Holguin F., Hussain I., Illowite J., Jacobs J., Jarratt M., Kaiser H., Kao N., Kashyap R., Kaufman D., Kent E., Kim K., Klein R., Kraft M., Kono R., Kureishy S., Leflein J., Leong M., Li H., Lin R., Lugogo N., Marcus M., Maselli Caceres D.J., Mehta V., Mello C., Millard M., Milstone A., Moore W., Moss M., Mumneh N., O'Brien T., Ostransky D., Palumbo M., Parikh P., Parikh S., Patel A., Perez G., Pleskow W., Prenner B., Puppala D., Ramey J., Reibman J., Reyes R., Robinette E., Rodicio I., Ryan S., Sekhsaria S., Sigal B., Sikand V., Soong W., Spangenthal S., St. John R., Steven G., Subramaniam V., Sumino K., Sztejman E., Tan R.A., Tanus T., Thompson C., Thornblade C., Villareal M., Wenzel S., Zafra H., Ziedalski T., and Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Université de Montpellier (UM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
- Subjects
Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine ,Spirometry ,Adult ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Exacerbation ,[SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio] ,Population ,Settore MED/10 - Malattie Dell'Apparato Respiratorio ,Placebo ,Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized ,03 medical and health sciences ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,0302 clinical medicine ,Double-Blind Method ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Anti-Asthmatic Agents ,Patient Reported Outcome Measures ,education ,Sinusitis ,Asthma ,education.field_of_study ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Benralizumab ,3. Good health ,Eosinophils ,030228 respiratory system ,chemistry ,Asthma Control Questionnaire ,Disease Progression ,Quality of Life ,Female ,business - Abstract
Background: ANDHI was done to assess the efficacy of benralizumab, including onset of effect and impact on health-related quality of life (HRQOL), exacerbation rate, lung function, and nasal polyposis symptoms. Methods: This phase 3b, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled ANDHI study was completed in adults (aged 18–75 years) with severe eosinophilic asthma with at least 2 exacerbations in the previous year, despite high-dose inhaled corticosteroid plus additional controllers, screening blood eosinophil counts of at least 150 cells per μL, and an Asthma Control Questionnaire 6 (ACQ-6) score of 1·5 or more. Patients who met eligibility criteria were randomly assigned (2:1; stratified by previous exacerbation count [two, or three or more], maintenance oral corticosteroid use, and region), using an integrated web-based response system, to receive benralizumab at 30 mg every 8 weeks (first three doses given 4 weeks apart) or matched placebo for 24 weeks. Primary efficacy measure was annualised asthma exacerbation rate, with rate ratio (RR) calculated over the approximate 24-week follow-up. Secondary efficacy measures included change from baseline to end of treatment (week 24) in St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score (key secondary endpoint), FEV1, peak expiratory flow (PEF), ACQ-6, Predominant Symptom and Impairment Assessment (PSIA), Clinician Global Impression of Change (CGI-C), Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C), and Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22). All efficacy analyses, except for SNOT-22, were summarised and analysed using the full analysis set on an intention-to-treat population (all randomly assigned patients receiving investigational product, regardless of protocol adherence or continued participation in the study). SNOT-22 was summarised for the subgroup of patients with physician-diagnosed nasal polyposis with informed consent. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03170271. Findings: Between July 7, 2017, and Sept 25, 2019, 656 patients received benralizumab (n=427) or placebo (n=229). Baseline characteristics were consistent with severe eosinophilic asthma. Benralizumab significantly reduced exacerbation risk by 49% compared with placebo (RR estimate 0·51, 95% CI 0·39–0·65; p5%) were nasopharyngitis (30 [7%]), headache (37 [9%]), sinusitis (28 [7%]), bronchitis (22 [5%]), and pyrexia (26 [6%]). Fewer serious adverse events were reported for benralizumab (23 [5%]) versus placebo (25 [11%]), and the only common serious adverse event (experienced by >1% of patients) was worsening of asthma, which was reported for nine (2%) patients in the benralizumab group and nine (4%) patients in the placebo group. Interpretation: Our results extend the efficacy profile of benralizumab for patients with severe eosinophilic asthma, showing early clinical benefits in patient-reported outcomes, HRQOL, lung function, and nasal polyposis symptoms. Funding: AstraZeneca.
- Published
- 2021
31. Mixed Th2 and non-Th2 inflammatory pattern in the asthma–COPD overlap: a network approach
- Author
-
Perez de Llano, Luis, Cosio, Borja G., Iglesias, Amanda, de las Cuevas, Natividad, Jose Soler-Cataluna, Juan, Luis Izquierdo, Jose, Luis Lopez-Campos, Jose, Calero, Carmen, Plaza, Vicente, Miravitlles, Marc, Torrego, Alfons, Martinez-Moragon, Eva, Soriano, Joan B., Lopez Vina, Antolin, Bobolea, Irina, and CHACOS Study Grp
- Subjects
redes neuronales (ordenador) ,Overlap ,Male ,Vital capacity ,inflammatory cytokines ,humanos ,Vital Capacity ,Systemic inflammation ,interleucina-8 ,volumen espiratorio forzado ,Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive ,0302 clinical medicine ,Interquartile range ,Forced Expiratory Volume ,interleucina-6 ,mediadores de la inflamación ,células TH2 ,interleucina-5 ,Eosinophilia ,moléculas de adhesión celular ,030212 general & internal medicine ,network analysis ,Lung ,mediana edad ,Original Research ,anciano ,COPD ,Interleukin-13 ,factor de necrosis tumoral alfa ,Interleukin-17 ,Discriminant Analysis ,General Medicine ,adulto ,Middle Aged ,interleucina-17 ,Inflammatory cytokines ,Prognosis ,asma ,pronóstico ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,IL-13 ,Network analysis ,Female ,Interleukin 17 ,medicine.symptom ,Inflammation Mediators ,Adult ,medicine.medical_specialty ,International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ,03 medical and health sciences ,Th2 Cells ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,asthma mechanisms ,overlap ,Humans ,Asthma ,Aged ,Asthma mechanisms ,business.industry ,Interleukin-6 ,Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha ,Interleukin-8 ,Neural Networks (Computer) ,medicine.disease ,respiratory tract diseases ,Cross-Sectional Studies ,pulmón ,030228 respiratory system ,Spain ,análisis discriminante ,Neural Networks, Computer ,capacidad vital ,Interleukin-5 ,business ,COPD mechanisms ,interleucina 13 ,Cell Adhesion Molecules ,Biomarkers ,estudios transversales - Abstract
Introduction: The asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) overlap (ACO) is a clinical condition that combines features of those two diseases, and that is difficult to define due to the lack of understanding of the underlying mechanisms. Determining systemic mediators may help clarify the nature of inflammation in patients with ACO. Objectives: We aimed at investigating the role and interaction of common markers of systemic inflammation (IL-6, IL-8, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha), Th2-related markers (periostin, IL-5, and IL-13), and IL-17 in asthma, COPD, and ACO. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study of patients aged >= 40 years with a post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in the first second/forced vital capacity < 0.70 recruited from out-patient clinics in tertiary hospitals with a clinical diagnosis of asthma, COPD, or ACO. ACO was defined by a history of smoking > 10 pack-years in a patient with a previous diagnosis of asthma or by the presence of eosinophilia in a patient with a previous diagnosis of COPD. Clinical, functional, and inflammatory parameters were compared between categories using discriminant and network analysis. Results: In total, 109 ACO, 89 COPD, and 94 asthma patients were included. Serum levels (median [interquartile range]) of IL-5 were higher in asthma patients than in COPD patients (2.09 [0.61-3.57] vs 1.11 [0.12-2.42] pg/mL, respectively; p=0.03), and IL-8 levels (median [interquartile range]) were higher in COPD patients than in asthma patients (9.45 [6.61-13.12] vs 7.03 [4.69-10.44] pg/mL, respectively; p < 0.001). Their values in ACO were intermediate between those in asthma and in COPD. Principal component and network analysis showed a mixed inflammatory pattern in ACO in between asthma and COPD. IL-13 was the most connected node in the network, with different weights among the three conditions. Conclusion: Asthma and COPD are two different inflammatory conditions that may overlap in some patients, leading to a mixed inflammatory pattern. IL-13 could be central to the regulation of inflammation in these conditions., The authors are grateful to all the patients who participated in the study. A number of investigators contributed to the study logistics and they are listed in the Supplementary materials. The project was endorsed by the COPD and Asthma Research Board (PII de EPOC y asma) of the Spanish Society of Pneumology and Thoracic Surgery (SEPAR). The project was partially funded by the Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad (FIS 15/01263) through European Union FEDER funds and by unrestricted grant from Chiesi Espana S.A.U.
- Published
- 2018
32. Real World Biologic Use and Switch Patterns in Severe Asthma: Data from the International Severe Asthma Registry and the US CHRONICLE Study.
- Author
-
Menzies-Gow, Andrew N, McBrien, Claire, Unni, Bindhu, Porsbjerg, Celeste M, Al-Ahmad, Mona, Ambrose, Christopher S, Assing, Karin Dahl, Bülow, Anna von, Busby, John, Cosio, Borja G, FitzGerald, J Mark, Gil, Esther Garcia, Hansen, Susanne, aHeaney, Liam G, Hew, Mark, Jackson, David J, Kallieri, Maria, Loukides, Stelios, Lugogo, Njira L, and Papaioannou, Andriana I
- Subjects
WHEEZE ,ASTHMA ,OMALIZUMAB - Abstract
Introduction: International registries provide opportunities to describe use of biologics for treating severe asthma in current clinical practice. Our aims were to describe real-life global patterns of biologic use (continuation, switches, and discontinuations) for severe asthma, elucidate reasons underlying these patterns, and examine associated patient-level factors. Methods: This was a historical cohort study including adults with severe asthma enrolled into the International Severe Asthma Registry (ISAR; http://isaregistries.org , 2015– 2020) or the CHRONICLE Study (2018– 2020) and treated with a biologic. Eleven countries were included (Bulgaria, Canada, Denmark, Greece, Italy, Japan, Kuwait, South Korea, Spain, UK, and USA). Biologic utilization patterns were defined: 1) continuing initial biologic; 2) stopping biologic treatment; or 3) switching to another biologic. Reasons for discontinuation/switching were recorded and comparisons drawn between groups. Results: A total of 3531 patients were included. Omalizumab was the most common initial biologic in 2015 (88.2%) and benralizumab in 2019 (29.6%). Most patients (79%; 2791/3531) continued their first biologic; 10.2% (356/3531) stopped; 10.8% (384/3531) switched. The most frequent first switch was from omalizumab to an anti–IL-5/5R (49.6%; 187/377). The most common subsequent switch was from one anti–IL-5/5R to another (44.4%; 20/45). Insufficient efficacy and/or adverse effects were the most frequent reasons for stopping/switching. Patients who stopped/switched were more likely to have a higher baseline blood eosinophil count and exacerbation rate, lower lung function, and greater health care resource utilization. Conclusion: The description of real-life patterns of continuing, stopping, or switching biologics enhances our understanding of global biologic use. Prospective studies involving structured switching criteria could ascertain optimal strategies to identify patients who may benefit from switching. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
33. Distribution and Outcomes of a Phenotype-Based Approach to Guide COPD Management: Results from the CHAIN Cohort.
- Author
-
Cosio, Borja G., Soriano, Joan B., López-Campos, Jose Luis, Calle, Myriam, Soler, Juan José, de-Torres, Juan Pablo, Marín, Jose Maria, Martínez, Cristina, de Lucas, Pilar, Mir, Isabel, Peces-Barba, Germán, Feu-Collado, Nuria, Solanes, Ingrid, Alfageme, Inmaculada, and null, null
- Subjects
- *
OBSTRUCTIVE lung disease treatment , *DISEASE exacerbation , *CLINICAL trials , *DEATH rate , *COHORT analysis - Abstract
Rationale: The Spanish guideline for COPD (GesEPOC) recommends COPD treatment according to four clinical phenotypes: non-exacerbator phenotype with either chronic bronchitis or emphysema (NE), asthma-COPD overlap syndrome (ACOS), frequent exacerbator phenotype with emphysema (FEE) or frequent exacerbator phenotype with chronic bronchitis (FECB). However, little is known on the distribution and outcomes of the four suggested phenotypes. Objective: We aimed to determine the distribution of these COPD phenotypes, and their relation with one-year clinical outcomes. Methods: We followed a cohort of well-characterized patients with COPD up to one-year. Baseline characteristics, health status (CAT), BODE index, rate of exacerbations and mortality up to one year of follow-up were compared between the four phenotypes. Results: Overall, 831 stable COPD patients were evaluated. They were distributed as NE, 550 (66.2%); ACOS, 125 (15.0%); FEE, 38 (4.6%); and FECB, 99 (11.9%); additionally 19 (2.3%) COPD patients with frequent exacerbations did not fulfill the criteria for neither FEE nor FECB. At baseline, there were significant differences in symptoms, FEV1 and BODE index (all p<0.05). The FECB phenotype had the highest CAT score (17.1±8.2, p<0.05 compared to the other phenotypes). Frequent exacerbator groups (FEE and FECB) were receiving more pharmacological treatment at baseline, and also experienced more exacerbations the year after (all p<0.05) with no differences in one-year mortality. Most of NE (93%) and half of exacerbators were stable after one year. Conclusions: There is an uneven distribution of COPD phenotypes in stable COPD patients, with significant differences in demographics, patient-centered outcomes and health care resources use. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
34. Nature of airway inflammation and remodeling in chronic cough.
- Author
-
Niimi, Akio, Torrego, Alfonso, Nicholson, Andrew G., Cosio, Borja G., Oates, Tim B., and Chung, Kian Fan
- Subjects
SMOOTH muscle ,ASTHMA ,MAST cells ,HYPERPLASIA - Abstract
Background: Chronic cough may be a result of asthma and nonasthma causes, but it is unclear whether there are specific inflammatory or remodeling changes. Objective: We determined airway mucosal changes in patients presenting with asthmatic cough and cough associated with nonasthmatic causes. Methods: Patients with chronic cough of nonasthmatic (n=33; postnasal drip/rhinitis in 6, gastroesophageal reflux in 5, bronchiectasis in 3, and idiopathic in 19) and asthmatic (n=14) causes and 15 healthy controls underwent fiberoptic bronchoscopy. Morphometry of bronchial biopsies and capsaicin cough sensitivity were assessed. Results: Compared with controls, submucosal eosinophils and neutrophils were increased in patients with asthmatic cough (P < .005) and submucosal mast cells in patients with nonasthmatic cough (P =.01). Subbasement membrane thickness, goblet cell area, vascularity, and vessel size were also increased in both groups. Smooth muscle area was higher only in patients with nonasthmatic cough (P =.0007 vs control and P =.019 vs asthmatic cough). None of the pathologic changes were related to the duration of coughing. Cough sensitivity was heightened in patients with nonasthmatic cough compared with controls and patients with asthmatic cough. The degree of goblet cell hyperplasia and epithelial shedding positively correlated with cough sensitivity in patients with nonasthmatic cough (r =0.43; P =.01; and r =0.40; P =.02, respectively). Conclusion: Features of airway wall remodeling are prominent in the airways with nonasthmatic as well as asthmatic cough. These are linked to chronic cough rather than to asthma. Mast cell hyperplasia rather than eosinophilia is distinctive for nonasthmatic cough. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]
- Published
- 2005
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
35. A proposal for the withdrawal of inhaled corticosteroids in the clinical practice of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
- Author
-
José Miguel Rodríguez González-Moro, Cristóbal Esteban, Borja G. Cosío, Bernardino Alcázar-Navarrete, José Antonio Quintano Jiménez, Cruz González, Aurelio Arnedillo, Juan Antonio Trigueros, Adolfo Baloira, Myriam Calle, Marc Miravitlles, Institut Català de la Salut, [Miravitlles M] Servei de Pneumologia, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain. [Cosío BG] CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Barcelona, Spain. Department of Respiratory Medicine, Hospital Universitario Son Espases-IdISBa, Palma de Mallorca, Spain. [Arnedillo A] Pneumology, Allergy and Thoracic Surgery Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar, Cádiz, Spain. Medicine Department, University of Cádiz, Cádiz, Spain. [Calle M] Pulmonary Department, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain. Departamento de Medicina, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain. [Alcázar-Navarrete B] Respiratory Department, AIG de Medicina, Hospital de Alta Resolución de Loja, Agencia Sanitaria Hospital de Poniente, Loja, Granada, Spain. [González C] Department of Respiratory Medicine, Hospital Clínico Universitario Valencia, Spain. Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria (INCLIVA) Valencia, Valencia, Spain., Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, [Miravitlles, Marc] Hosp Univ Vall dHebron, Pneumol Dept, P Vall dHebron 119-129, Barcelona 08035, Spain, [Cosio, Borja G.] CIBER Enfermedades Resp CIBERES, Barcelona, Spain, [Cosio, Borja G.] Hosp Univ Son Espases IdISBa, Dept Resp Med, Palma De Mallorca, Spain, [Arnedillo, Aurelio] Hosp Univ Puerta Mar, Pneumol Allergy & Thorac Surg Dept, Cadiz, Spain, [Arnedillo, Aurelio] Univ Cadiz, Med Dept, Cadiz, Spain, [Calle, Myriam] Hosp Clin San Carlos, Inst Invest Sanitaria Hosp Clin San Car Carlos Id, Pulm Dept, Madrid, Spain, [Calle, Myriam] Univ Complutense Madrid, Fac Med, Dept Med, Madrid, Spain, [Alcazar-Navarrete, Bernardino] Agencia Sanitaria Hosp Poniente, Hosp Alta Resoluc Loja, Resp Dept, AIG Med, Granada, Spain, [Gonzalez, Cruz] Hosp Clin Univ, Dept Resp Med, Valencia, Spain, [Gonzalez, Cruz] Inst Invest Sanitaria INCLIVA Valencia, Valencia, Spain, [Esteban, Cristobal] Hosp Galdakao Usansolo, Pneumol Dept, Biscay, Spain, [Esteban, Cristobal] Red Invest Serv Sanitarios & Enfermed Cron REDISS, Bilbao, Spain, [Antonio Trigueros, Juan] Auton Hlth Serv, Hlth Ctr Menasalbas, Toledo, Spain, [Rodriguez Gonzalez-Moro, Jose Miguel] Hosp Univ Principe Asturias, Pneumol Dept, Madrid, Spain, [Quintano Jimenez, Jose Antonio] Ctr Salud Lucena I, Cordoba, Spain, [Baloira, Adolfo] Complejo Hosp Univ Pontevedra, Serv Neurol, Pontevedra, Spain, and Novartis
- Subjects
humanos ,Review ,Disease ,broncodilatadores ,Fluticasone propionate ,Other subheadings::Other subheadings::/drug therapy [Other subheadings] ,Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive ,0302 clinical medicine ,Adrenal Cortex Hormones ,Broncodilatadors ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ,Otros calificadores::Otros calificadores::/tratamiento farmacológico [Otros calificadores] ,COPD ,Withholding Treatment ,Hormones, Hormone Substitutes, and Hormone Antagonists::Hormones::Adrenal Cortex Hormones [CHEMICALS AND DRUGS] ,Inhaled corticosteroids ,ensayos clínicos controlados aleatorizados como asunto ,Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ,Copd overlap syndrome ,Double-blind ,Management ,Bronchodilator Agents ,enfermedades respiratorias::enfermedades pulmonares::enfermedades pulmonares obstructivas::enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica [ENFERMEDADES] ,Algorithm ,Salmeterol-fluticasone ,Other subheadings::Other subheadings::/administration & dosage [Other subheadings] ,Risk ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Pulmonary disease ,Exacerbations ,03 medical and health sciences ,Chemical Actions and Uses::Pharmacologic Actions::Physiological Effects of Drugs::Peripheral Nervous System Agents::Autonomic Agents::Bronchodilator Agents [CHEMICALS AND DRUGS] ,Administration, Inhalation ,medicine ,Humans ,hormonas, sustitutos de hormonas y antagonistas de hormonas::hormonas::hormonas de la corteza suprarrenal [COMPUESTOS QUÍMICOS Y DROGAS] ,Intensive care medicine ,Adverse effect ,acciones y usos químicos::acciones farmacológicas::efectos fisiológicos de los fármacos::fármacos del sistema nervioso periférico::fármacos del sistema nervioso autónomo::broncodilatadores [COMPUESTOS QUÍMICOS Y DROGAS] ,Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists ,lcsh:RC705-779 ,Otros calificadores::Otros calificadores::/administración & dosificación [Otros calificadores] ,Respiratory Tract Diseases::Lung Diseases::Lung Diseases, Obstructive::Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive [DISEASES] ,business.industry ,Pulmons - Malalties obstructives ,neumonía ,Pneumonia ,lcsh:Diseases of the respiratory system ,medicine.disease ,Corticosteroides ,Asthma ,agonistas de receptores adrenérgicos beta-2 ,Lung function ,suspensión del tratamiento ,Discontinuation ,030228 respiratory system ,Salmeterol/fluticasone propionate ,Blood eosinophils ,business ,hormonas de la corteza suprarrenal - Abstract
According to the current clinical practice guidelines for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), the addition of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) to long-acting beta(2) agonist therapy is recommended in patients with moderate-to-severe disease and an increased risk of exacerbations. However, ICS are largely overprescribed in clinical practice, and most patients are unlikely to benefit from long-term ICS therapy. Evidence from recent randomized-controlled trials supports the hypothesis that ICS can be safely and effectively discontinued in patients with stable COPD and in whom ICS therapy may not be indicated, without detrimental effects on lung function, health status, or risk of exacerbations. This article summarizes the evidence supporting the discontinuation of ICS therapy, and proposes an algorithm for the implementation of ICS withdrawal in patients with COPD in clinical practice. Given the increased risk of potentially serious adverse effects and complications with ICS therapy (including pneumonia), the use of ICS should be limited to the minority of patients in whom the treatment effects outweigh the risks., This article is a summary of a workshop held in Barcelona, Spain on February 14 2017. The workshop was supported by unrestricted grant from Novartis. The sponsor had no role in the discussion, preparation of manuscript and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
- Published
- 2017
36. Prevalence of persistent blood eosinophilia: relation to outcomes in patients with COPD
- Author
-
Ramón Agüero, Eva Balcells, Pilar de Lucas-Ramos, Celia Lacarcel, Inmaculada Alfageme, Jose M. Marin, Carlos Javier Gutiérrez Cabrera, Victor Pinto-Plata, Miguel Divo, Juan P. de-Torres, Alfredo de Diego, Rafael Golpe, Myriam Calle-Rubio, Amalia Moreno, Ingrid Solanes, Juan B. Galdiz, José Luis López-Campos, Joan B. Soriano, Nuria Feu-Collado, Bartolome R. Celli, Juan José Soler-Cataluña, Antonia Fuster, Amparo Romero, Antonia Llunell, Borja G. Cosío, Cristina Martínez-González, Ciro Casanova, Margarita Marín, Germán Peces-Barba, [Casanova, Ciro] Hosp Univ Ntra Sra La Candelaria, Pulmonol Dept, Tenerife, Spain, [Celli, Bartolome R.] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Pulm & Crit Care Dept, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA, [Divo, Miguel] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Pulm & Crit Care Dept, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA, [de-Torres, Juan P.] Clin Univ Navarra, Pulm Dept, Pamplona, Spain, [Martinez-Gonzalez, Cristina] Hosp Cent Asturias, Pulm Dept, Oviedo, Spain, [Cosio, Borja G.] Hosp Son Espases IdISPa, Pulm Dept, Palma de Mallorca, Spain, [Cosio, Borja G.] Inst Salud Carlos III, CIBER Enfermedades Resp CIBERES, Madrid, Spain, [Peces-Barba, German] Inst Salud Carlos III, CIBER Enfermedades Resp CIBERES, Madrid, Spain, [Luis Lopez-Campos, Jose] Inst Salud Carlos III, CIBER Enfermedades Resp CIBERES, Madrid, Spain, [Pinto-Plata, Victor] Baystate Med Ctr, Springfield, MA USA, [de Lucas-Ramos, Pilar] Hosp Gregorio Maranon, Pulm Dept 1, Madrid, Spain, [Fuster, Antonia] Hosp Son Llatzer, Pulm Dept, Mallorca, Spain, [Peces-Barba, German] Fdn Jimenez Diaz, Pulm Dept, Madrid, Spain, [Calle-Rubio, Myriam] Univ Complutense Madrid, Fac Med, Med Dept, Hosp Clin San Carlos,Pulm Dept, Madrid, Spain, [Solanes, Ingrid] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Hosp Santa Creu & Sant Pau, Pulm Dept, Barcelona, Spain, [Aguero, Ramon] Hosp Marques Valdecilla, Pulm Dept, Santander, Spain, [Feu-Collado, Nuria] Hosp Univ Reina Sofia, IMIBIC, UCO, Pulm Dept, Cordoba, Spain, [Alfageme, Inmaculada] Hosp Univ Valme, Pulm Dept, Seville, Spain, [De Diego, Alfredo] Hosp Univ La Fe, Pulm Dept, Valencia, Spain, [Romero, Amparo] Hosp Manacor, Pulm Dept, Mallorca, Spain, [Balcells, Eva] Hosp Mar, Pulm Dept, Barcelona, Spain, [Llunell, Antonia] Hosp Tarrasa, Pulm Dept, Tarrasa, Spain, [Galdiz, Juan B.] Hosp Cruces, Pulm Dept, Bilbao, Spain, [Marin, Margarita] Hosp Gen Castellon, Pulm Dept, Castellon de La Plana, Spain, [Moreno, Amalia] Hosp Parc Tauli, Pulm Dept, Barcelona, Spain, [Cabrera, Carlos] Hosp Dr Negrin, Pulm Dept, Las Palmas Gran Canaria, Spain, [Golpe, Rafael] Hosp Univ Lucus Augusti, Pulm Dept, Lugo, Spain, [Lacarcel, Celia] Hosp Ciudad Jaen, Pulm Dept, Jaen, Spain, [Soriano, Joan B.] Hosp Univ La Princesa IISP, Inst Invest, Madrid, Spain, [Luis Lopez-Campos, Jose] Hosp Univ Virgen Rocio, Inst Biomed Sevilla IBiS, Unidad Med Quirrurg Enfermedades Resp, Seville, Spain, [Soler-Cataluna, Juan J.] Hosp Arnau Vilanova, Pulm Dept, Valencia, Spain, [Marin, Jose M.] Hosp Univ Miguel Servet, IISAragon, CIBERES, Pulm Dept, Zaragoza, Spain, and AstraZeneca (Madrid, Spain)
- Subjects
Male ,Cohort Studies ,Leukocyte Count ,Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive ,0302 clinical medicine ,Risk Factors ,Forced Expiratory Volume ,Prevalence ,Medicine ,Eosinophilia ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Obstructive pulmonary-disease ,COPD ,Inhaled corticosteroids ,respiratory system ,Middle Aged ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Cohort ,Disease Progression ,Female ,medicine.symptom ,Cohort study ,Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Efficacy ,Guidelines ,Exacerbations ,03 medical and health sciences ,Internal medicine ,Humans ,In patient ,Risk factor ,Survival analysis ,Aged ,Clinical characteristics ,business.industry ,Biomarker ,Eosinophil ,medicine.disease ,Survival Analysis ,Asthma ,respiratory tract diseases ,Eosinophils ,Dyspnea ,030228 respiratory system ,Spain ,Immunology ,Fluticasone ,business - Abstract
The impact of blood eosinophilia in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remains controversial.To evaluate the prevalence and stability of a high level of blood eosinophils (>= 300 cells.mu L-1) and its relationship to outcomes, we determined blood eosinophils at baseline and over 2 years in 424 COPD patients (forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) 60% predicted) and 67 smokers without COPD from the CHAIN cohort, and in 308 COPD patients (FEV1 60% predicted) in the BODE cohort. We related eosinophil levels to exacerbations and survival using Cox hazard analysis.In COPD patients, 15.8% in the CHAIN cohort and 12.3% in the BODE cohort had persistently elevated blood eosinophils at all three visits. A significant proportion (43.8%) of patients had counts that oscillated above and below the cut-off points, while the rest had persistent eosinophil levels = 300 cells.mu L-1) and its relationship to outcomes, we determined blood eosinophils at baseline and over 2 years in 424 COPD patients (forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) 60% predicted) and 67 smokers without COPD from the CHAIN cohort, and in 308 COPD patients (FEV1 60% predicted) in the BODE cohort. We related eosinophil levels to exacerbations and survival using Cox hazard analysis.In COPD patients, 15.8% in the CHAIN cohort and 12.3% in the BODE cohort had persistently elevated blood eosinophils at all three visits. A significant proportion (43.8%) of patients had counts that oscillated above and below the cut-off points, while the rest had persistent eosinophil levels = 300 cells.mu L-1 persisting over 2 years was not a risk factor for COPD exacerbations. High eosinophil count was associated with better survival.
- Published
- 2017
37. Algorithm for identification of asthma-COPD overlap: consensus between the Spanish COPD and asthma guidelines
- Author
-
Vicente Plaza, Ciro Casanova, Francisco Javier Álvarez-Gutiérrez, Antolín López-Viña, Luis Pérez de Llano, Miguel Román-Rodríguez, Borja G. Cosío, Juan José Soler-Cataluña, Santiago Quirce, Marc Miravitlles, Myriam Calle, [Miravitlles, Marc] Hosp Univ Vall dHebron, Pneumol Dept, Pg Vall dHebron 119-129, Barcelona 08035, Spain, [Miravitlles, Marc] CIBER Enfermedades Resp CIBERES, Barcelona, Spain, [Cosio, Borja G.] CIBER Enfermedades Resp CIBERES, Barcelona, Spain, [Quirce, Santiago] CIBER Enfermedades Resp CIBERES, Barcelona, Spain, [Javier Alvarez-Gutierrez, Francisco] Virgen del Rocio Univ Hosp, Med Surg Unit Resp Dis, Biomed Inst Seville IBiS, Seville, Spain, [Calle, Myriam] Univ Complutense Madrid, Hosp Clin San Carlos, Dept Resp Med, Madrid, Spain, [Calle, Myriam] Inst Invest Biomed San Carlos IdISSC, Dept Med, Madrid, Spain, [Casanova, Ciro] Hosp Univ Nuestra Senora de la Candelaria, Santa Cruz De Tenerife, Spain, [Cosio, Borja G.] Hosp Univ Son Espases IdISPa, Palma De Mallorca, Spain, [Lopez-Vina, Antolin] Hosp Univ Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain, [Perez de Llano, Luis] Hosp Univ LucusAugusti, Lugo, Spain, [Quirce, Santiago] Hosp La Paz, Inst Hlth Res IdiPAZ, Dept Allergy, Madrid, Spain, [Roman-Rodriguez, Miguel] IB Salut, Primary Healthcare Ctr Son Pisa, Palma De Mallorca, Spain, [Jose Soler-Cataluna, Juan] Hosp Arnau de Vilanova Lliria, Pneumol Dept, Valencia, Spain, and [Plaza, Vicente] Hosp Santa CreuiSt Pau, Dept Resp Med, IIB St Pau, Barcelona, SpainUniv Autonoma Barcelona, Dept Med, Barcelona, Spain
- Subjects
Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine ,Consensus ,MEDLINE ,Pulmonary disease ,03 medical and health sciences ,Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive ,0302 clinical medicine ,Diagnosis ,medicine ,Humans ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Asthma copd overlap ,Societies, Medical ,Obstructive pulmonary-disease ,Asthma ,COPD ,business.industry ,medicine.disease ,United States ,respiratory tract diseases ,030228 respiratory system ,Practice Guidelines as Topic ,Identification (biology) ,business ,Algorithm ,Algorithms - Abstract
An algorithm to identify patients with ACO rather than asthma or COPD alone http://ow.ly/Viyy308Ehdk
- Published
- 2017
38. Th-2 signature in chronic airway diseases: towards the extinction of asthma-COPD overlap syndrome?
- Author
-
Cosío, Borja G, Pérez de Llano, Luis, Lopez Viña, Antolin, Torrego, Alfons, Lopez-Campos, Jose Luis, Soriano, Joan B, Martinez Moragon, Eva, Izquierdo, Jose Luis, Bobolea, Irina, Callejas, Javier, Plaza, Vicente, Miravitlles, Marc, Soler-Catalunya, Juan Jose, on behalf of the CHACOS study group, [Cosio, Borja G.] Hosp Univ Son Espases IdISBa & Ciberes, Dept Resp Med, Palma De Mallorca, Spain, [Perez de Llano, Luis] Hosp Lucus Augusti, Dept Resp Med, Lugo, Spain, [Lopez Vina, Antolin] Hosp Puerta Hierro, Dept Resp Med, Madrid, Spain, [Torrego, Alfons] Hosp Santa Creu & Sant Pau, Dept Resp Med, Barcelona, Spain, [Plaza, Vicente] Hosp Santa Creu & Sant Pau, Dept Resp Med, Barcelona, Spain, [Luis Lopez-Campos, Jose] Hosp Virgen Rocio, Dept Resp Med, Seville, Spain, [Soriano, Joan B.] Univ Autonoma Madrid, Hosp Princesa, Catedra Linde, Madrid, Spain, [Martinez Moragon, Eva] Hosp Dr Peset, Dept Resp Med, Valencia, Spain, [Luis Izquierdo, Jose] Hosp Univ Guadalajara, Dept Resp Med, Guadalajara, Spain, [Bobolea, Irina] Hosp 12 Octubre, Dept Allergy, Madrid, Spain, [Callejas, Javier] Hosp Univ Albacete, Dept Resp Med, Albacete, Spain, [Miravitlles, Marc] Hosp Univ Vall dHebron, Dept Resp Med, Barcelona, Spain, [Jose Soler-Catalunya, Juan] Hosp Arnau Vilanova, Dept Resp Med, Valencia, Spain, Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad, and Chiesi Pharmaceutici SpA
- Subjects
Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine ,Male ,Vital capacity ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Exacerbation ,Nitric Oxide ,Exacerbations ,03 medical and health sciences ,Leukocyte Count ,Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive ,0302 clinical medicine ,Th2 Cells ,Sputum-eosinophilia ,Internal medicine ,Eosinophilic ,Validation ,Medicine ,Humans ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Obstructive pulmonary-disease ,Asthma ,Aged ,COPD ,business.industry ,Smoking ,Sputum ,Syndrome ,Eosinophil ,Immunoglobulin E ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Eosinophilic inflammation ,Standardization ,respiratory tract diseases ,Respiratory Function Tests ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Cross-Sectional Studies ,030228 respiratory system ,Spain ,Exhaled nitric oxide ,Immunology ,Female ,medicine.symptom ,Blood eosinophils ,business ,Biomarkers - Abstract
We aimed to describe the differences and similarities between patients with chronic obstructive airway disease classified on the basis of classical diagnostic labels (asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), or asthma–COPD overlap (ACOS)) or according to the underlying inflammatory pattern (Th-2 signature, either Th-2-high or Th-2-low).We performed a cross-sectional study of patients aged ≥40 years and with a post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s to forced vital capacity ratio ≤0.7 with a previous diagnosis of asthma (non-smoking asthmatics (NSA)), COPD or ACOS, the latter including both smoking asthmatics (SA) and patients with eosinophilic COPD (COPD-e). Clinical, functional and inflammatory parameters (blood eosinophil count, IgE and exhaled nitric oxide fraction (FeNO)) were compared between groups. Th-2 signature was defined by a blood eosinophil count ≥300 cells·μL−1 and/or a sputum eosinophil count ≥3%.Overall, 292 patients were included in the study: 89 with COPD, 94 NSA and 109 with ACOS (44 SA and 65 with COPD-e). No differences in symptoms or exacerbation rate were found between the three groups. With regards the underlying inflammatory pattern, 94 patients (32.2%) were characterised as Th-2-high and 198 (67.8%) as Th-2-low. The Th-2 signature was found in 49% of NSA, 3.3% of patients with COPD, 30% of SA and 49.3% of patients with COPD-e. This classification yielded significant differences in demographic, functional and inflammatory characteristics.We conclude that a classification based upon the inflammatory profile, irrespective of the taxonomy, provides a more clear distinction of patients with chronic obstructive airway disease.
- Published
- 2017
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.