Search

Background: Up to 30% of adults with severe asthma are hypersensitive to aspirin and no unambiguous theory exists which provides a satisfactory explanation for the occurrence of aspirin-induced asthma (AIA) in some asthmatic patients. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the AIA expression profile against aspirin tolerant asthma (ATA) and healthy volunteers (HV) profile in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) after in vitro aspirin challenge in Caucasian population., Methods: PBMCs were separated from blood of three groups of subjects--11 AIA, 7 ATA and 15 HV and then stimulated by either 2 μM lysine aspirin or 20 μM lysine as a control. Subsequently, RNA was isolated, transcribed into cDNA and subjected to microarray and qPCR studies. Simultaneously, protein was extracted from PBMCs and used in further immunoblotting analysis., Results: The validation of results at mRNA level has shown only three genes, whose expression was significantly altered between comprising groups. mRNA expression of CNPY3 in PBMCs in AIA was significantly lower (-0.41 ± 2.67) than in HV (1.04 ± 2.69), (p = 0.02); mRNA expression of FOSL1 in PBMCs in AIA was also significantly decreased (-0.66 ± 2.97) as opposed to HV (0.31 ± 4.83), (p = 0.02). While mRNA expression of ERAS in PBMCs was increased (1.15 ± 0.23) in AIA in comparison to HV (-1.32 ± 0.41), (p = 0.03). At protein level the changed expression of one protein was confirmed. Protein expression of FOSL1 in PBMCs in AIA was both significantly lower (-0.86 ± 0.08) than in ATA (0.39 ± 0.42), (p = 0.046) and in HV (0.9 ± 0.27), (p = 0.007)., Conclusions: This pilot study implies a positive association between CNPY3, ERAS, FOSL1 and aspirin-intolerant asthma, suggesting that these findings would be useful for further investigations of NSAIDs mechanism.

Background: Nasal nitric oxide (nNO) levels after nasal lysine acetylsalicylic acid (lys-ASA) challenge have not been determined. This study was designed to determine a pattern of changes after lys-ASA challenge in aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) patients and to evaluate the usefulness of nNO measurements in the assessment of lys-ASA nasal challenge outcome., Methods: Eighteen patients with aspirin hypersensitivity, nasal polyps, and asthma were included. Aspirin-tolerant control groups consisted of 10 healthy volunteers without asthma and nasal polyps and 10 patients with nasal polyps without asthma. All subjects underwent nasal challenge with lys-ASA. nNO was measured before and 1, 2, 4, and 24 hours after control solution and lys-ASA administration., Results: A significant fall in nNO levels was noted in AERD patients with a positive result to challenges at time points 1 hour (p = 0.0033), 2 hours (p = 0.0033), and 3 hours (p = 0.026) after lys-ASA. A trend toward higher nNO concentrations was observed after lys-ASA challenge at the 2-hour (p = 0.018) and 4-hour (p = 0.018) time points compared with baseline in subjects with AERD and a clinically negative result to the challenge. No significant changes in nNO levels after the challenge were observed in control groups. The combined increase and decrease in nNO levels gave the sensitivity as 0.94 and specificity 1.00 at best., Conclusion: nNO levels decrease after lys-ASA nasal challenge in subjects with AERD and a clinically positive result of the challenge. An unexpected trend toward an increase in nNO levels is observed in subjects with AERD and a clinically negative result of the challenge.

Background: Lipoxins represent a group of lipoxygenase derived eicosanoids which, in contrast to leukotrienes, are potent anti-inflammatory mediators. The aim of our study was to determine lipoxin A(4) (LXA(4)) and leukotriene C(4) (LTC(4)) levels in nasal lavages after intranasal challenge with aspirin in aspirin intolerant (AIA) in comparison to aspirin tolerant (ATA) asthmatics and after allergen challenge in patients suffering from allergic rhinitis., Methods: Twelve AIA, 8 ATA and 20 allergic patients were challenged with placebo, 16 mg of lysine-aspirin (Lys-ASA) or allergen (grasses). Nasal lavages were collected and eicosanoids' levels were determined using ELISA., Results: Clinically positive Lys-ASA challenge in AIA resulted in influx of leukocytes (eosinophils and basophils) to nasal secretions and increase of LTC(4) to 106.82 pg/ml (P < 0.05 vs baseline (26.58 pg/ml)) on first hour after the challenge. We did not observe any differences in LTC(4) level before and after ASA challenge in ATA. In AIA group the mean level of LXA(4) was 43 +/- 21.5 pg/ml after placebo and decreased in 2 h after Lys-ASA challenge (29 +/- 17 pg/ml, P = 0.015). We found an increase in LXA(4) in ATA after ASA provocation as compared to placebo (33 +/- 16 pg/ml vs 52 +/- 31 pg/ml, P = 0.046). In atopic patients baseline level of LXA(4) was 33.49 +/- 16.95 pg/ml with no difference after the clinically positive allergen challenge (36.22 +/- 13.26 pg/ml, P = 0.23)., Conclusions: Results of our study confirm that AIA have diminished LXs' biosynthesis capacities in vivo after ASA challenge. Taking into consideration anti-inflammatory properties of lipoxins this phenomenon may be partially responsible for the development of chronic inflammation in AIA patients.

The reliability, rapidity, and safety of nonsurgical, transatrial pericardial access for local cardiac therapy have been demonstrated in healthy animals. Since many patients take aspirin or have increased right-sided pressures, we evaluated the procedure's safety under these conditions. Transatrial pericardial access was performed in anesthetized pigs following aspirin administration (162 mg p.o., n = 6) or during experimental pulmonary artery hypertension (n = 4 different animals) and required only 3 minutes following guide catheter positioning. Platelet aggregability testing with arachidonic acid confirmed aspirin effectiveness. Mean pericardial fluid hematocrit was 0.1 +/- 0.1% after 2 days of aspirin therapy and 1.9 +/- 1.1% at sacrifice 24 hours later (NS). Mean pericardial fluid hematocrit was 1.0 +/- 0.5% after 45 minutes of pulmonary artery hypertension and 4.3 +/- 0.8% at sacrifice 30 minutes later (NS). Histologic analysis in both groups revealed a small thrombus and localized inflammation at the site of puncture. Neither aspirin use nor pulmonary artery hypertension causes significant bleeding into the pericardial space following transatrial access and thus does not preclude this route for local cardiac drug delivery.

Markers of inflammation, such as C-reactive protein (CRP) and fibrinogen, have been shown to be predictive of cardiovascular disease. In the Physicians Health Study, the magnitude of reduction in the risk of myocardial infarction with aspirin therapy was related to baseline CRP levels, raising the possibility that the protective effect of aspirin may be due to antiinflammatory properties in addition to its antiplatelet effect. We therefore investigated whether aspirin therapy lowers CRP levels. Because heavy physical exertion is a well-known trigger of myocardial infarction, we also investigated the effect of aspirin on CRP levels before and after strenuous exercise. Thirty-two healthy men, aged 29 +/- 6 years, were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, parallel study. Blood samples were obtained immediately before and after maximal treadmill exercise at baseline and following 7 days of aspirin therapy (81 or 325 mg). The levels of CRP, as measured by ELISA, increased by 13% following exercise (P < 0.0001). However, aspirin did not significantly alter CRP levels, either at rest (0.81 +/- 0.13 mg/L before aspirin vs. 0.78 +/- 0.13 mg/L on aspirin) or following exercise (0.92 +/- 0.13 mg/L before aspirin vs. 0.86 +/- 0. 13 mg/L on aspirin), P = 0.73. When the resting and postexercise data were combined, the levels were 0.87 +/- 0.13 mg/L before aspirin and 0.82 +/- 0.13 mg/L on aspirin (a nonsignificant 6% reduction, P = 0.20). In conclusion, in healthy male subjects CRP levels were not significantly reduced by short-term aspirin therapy. Our data, taking together with other reports, suggest that aspirin may not affect the levels of inflammatory markers. However, further studies are needed with a longer duration of therapy, among subjects with coronary heart disease, and using additional markers of inflammation besides CRP to determine the long-term effects of aspirin use.

Although aspirin is effective in the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular diseases, the optimal dose remains uncertain. The purpose of this study was to compare the platelet inhibitory and prostacyclin-sparing effects of 2 doses (81 and 325 mg) and forms (enteric-coated and regular) of aspirin. Since platelet reactivity has been reported to increase after strenuous exercise, a known trigger of myocardial infarction, subjects were studied following maximal treadmill exercise as well as at rest. Forty male healthy subjects were evaluated using a randomized, double-blind, parallel study design. Blood samples were obtained before and after maximal treadmill exercise at baseline and after 7 days on aspirin therapy. Both enteric and regular aspirin in 81- and 325-mg dosages markedly inhibited adenosine diphosphate and epinephrine-induced aggregation at rest and after exercise. Aspirin also inhibited the platelet response to collagen as assessed by a longer lag time to aggregation. The prolongation of lag time was greater for 325 mg than for 81 mg (100 +/- 7 vs 91 +/- 7; p = 0.04, after exercise). There were no significant dose-related differences in plasma 6-keto-prostaglandin F1alpha level; however, enteric-coated aspirin inhibited the exercise-induced increase in 6-keto-prostaglandin F1alpha to a lesser extent than regular aspirin. Although both doses (81 and 325 mg) and types (regular and enteric-coated) of aspirin inhibited adenosine diphosphate and epinephrine-induced aggregation equally, the 325-mg dose inhibited collagen-induced aggregation to a greater extent than 81 mg. The greater platelet inhibition observed with 325 mg may be clinically relevant in acute coronary syndromes characterized by plaque rupture with extensive collagen exposure and platelet activation.

Aim: While regular use of low-dose aspirin has been recommended for several groups of patients at risk of vascular occlusion, the optimal dose of aspirin to produce a cardiovascular benefit whilst minimizing side effects is uncertain. Further, while enteric coated preparations may reduce gastrointestinal symptoms, the antiplatelet effects of these formulations have not been completely tested. In addition, exceptionally few data relating to these issues have been available in women., Methods: To determine whether a 100 mg alternate day dose of aspirin given in regular and enteric coated formulations for a 2-week period is sufficient to inhibit platelet function in men and women, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted among 22 healthy volunteers evaluating the effects of these preparations on platelet aggregation induced by arachidonic acid, adenosine diphosphate, and epinephrine, and on plasma concentrations of thromboxane and prostacyclin., Results: During the active aspirin phase of the study, all subjects demonstrated a clinical anti-platelet effect as evidenced by failure of the platelets to aggregate in the presence of at least one platelet agonist, and mean thromboxane and prostacyclin levels decreased to 7.5 and 15.6% of baseline, respectively (both P < 0.001). After cessation of active aspirin, all subjects had fully recovery of platelet function as well as thromboxane and prostacyclin production. There were virtually no differences between regular and enteric coated formulations, or between men and women., Conclusion: These data indicate that an alternate day regimen of 100 mg aspirin given in either regular or enteric coated formulation is adequate to achieve functional platelet inhibition. The clinical efficacy of this dose and formulation of aspirin is being tested in the ongoing Women's Health Study, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 40000 female health professionals designed in part to assess the benefits and risks of 100 mg alternate day aspirin in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.

Background: Lipoxins represent a group of lipoxygenase derived eicosanoids which, in contrast to leukotrienes, are potent anti-inflammatory mediators. The aim of our study was to determine lipoxin A4 (LXA4) and leukotriene C4 (LTC4) levels in nasal lavages after intranasal challenge with aspirin in aspirin intolerant (AIA) in comparison to aspirin tolerant (ATA) asthmatics and after allergen challenge in patients suffering from allergic rhinitis. Methods: Twelve AIA, 8 ATA and 20 allergic patients were challenged with placebo, 16 mg of lysine-aspirin (Lys-ASA) or allergen (grasses). Nasal lavages were collected and eicosanoids’ levels were determined using ELISA. Results: Clinically positive Lys-ASA challenge in AIA resulted in influx of leukocytes (eosinophils and basophils) to nasal secretions and increase of LTC4 to 106.82 pg/ml ( P < 0.05 vs baseline (26.58 pg/ml)) on first hour after the challenge. We did not observe any differences in LTC4 level before and after ASA challenge in ATA. In AIA group the mean level of LXA4 was 43 ± 21.5 pg/ml after placebo and decreased in 2 h after Lys-ASA challenge (29 ± 17 pg/ml, P = 0.015). We found an increase in LXA4 in ATA after ASA provocation as compared to placebo (33 ± 16 pg/ml vs 52 ± 31 pg/ml, P = 0.046). In atopic patients baseline level of LXA4 was 33.49 ± 16.95 pg/ml with no difference after the clinically positive allergen challenge (36.22 ± 13.26 pg/ml, P = 0.23). Conclusions: Results of our study confirm that AIA have diminished LXs’ biosynthesis capacities in vivo after ASA challenge. Taking into consideration anti-inflammatory properties of lipoxins this phenomenon may be partially responsible for the development of chronic inflammation in AIA patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]