Search

We compared thromboembolic events, major haemorrhage and death after knee replacement in patients receiving either aspirin or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). Data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales were linked to an administrative database of hospital admissions in the English National Health Service. A total of 156,798 patients between April 2003 and September 2008 were included and followed for 90 days. Multivariable risk modelling was used to estimate odds ratios adjusted for baseline risk factors (AOR). An AOR < 1 indicates that risk rates are lower with LMWH than with aspirin. In all, 36,159 patients (23.1%) were prescribed aspirin and 120,639 patients (76.9%) were prescribed LMWH. We found no statistically significant differences between the aspirin and LMWH groups in the rate of pulmonary embolism (0.49% vs 0.45%, AOR 0.88 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.74 to 1.05); p = 0.16), 90-day mortality (0.39% vs 0.45%, AOR 1.13 (95% CI 0.94 to 1.37); p = 0.19) or major haemorrhage (0.37% vs 0.39%, AOR 1.01 (95% CI 0.83 to 1.22); p = 0.94). There was a significantly greater likelihood of needing to return to theatre in the aspirin group (0.26% vs 0.19%, AOR 0.73 (95% CI 0.58 to 0.94); p = 0.01). Between patients receiving LMWH or aspirin there was only a small difference in the risk of pulmonary embolism, 90-day mortality and major haemorrhage. These results should be considered when the existing guidelines for thromboprophylaxis after knee replacement are reviewed.

We compared thromboembolic events, major haemorrhage and death after total hip replacement in patients receiving either aspirin or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). We analysed data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales linked to an administrative database of hospital admissions in the English National Health Service. A total of 108,584 patients operated on between April 2003 and September 2008 were included and followed up for 90 days. Multivariable risk modelling and propensity score matching were used to estimate odds ratios (OR) adjusted for baseline risk factors. An OR < 1 indicates that rates are lower with LMWH than with aspirin. In all, 21.1% of patients were prescribed aspirin and 78.9% LMWH. Without adjustment, we found no statistically significant differences. The rate of pulmonary embolism was 0.68% in both groups and 90-day mortality was 0.65% with aspirin and 0.61% with LMWH (OR 0.93; 95% CI 0.77 to 1.11). With risk adjustment, the difference in mortality increased (OR 0.84; 95% CI 0.69 to 1.01). With propensity score matching the mortality difference increased even further to 0.65% with aspirin and 0.51% with LMWH (OR 0.77; 95% CI 0.61 to 0.98). These results should be considered when the conflicting recommendations of existing guidelines for thromboprophylaxis after hip replacement are being addressed.

The release of aspirin from a 75 mg controlled-release formulation, designed to inhibit maximally thromboxane A2 production while sparing stimulated prostacyclin biosynthesis, was characterised in healthy subjects. The calculated in vivo release rate of aspirin matched the design goal of approximately 10 mg h(-1). The C(max) of aspirin associated with the controlled-release formulation was lowered 15-fold relative to a solution formulation of the same dose. The bioavailability of aspirin (based on salicylate concentrations) from the controlled-release formulation was approximately 90% relative to the solution, and drug release was not affected by co-administration of a standard breakfast.

The utility of aspirin in the treatment of vascular occlusive disease has been ascribed to its blockade of platelet thromboxane A2 (TxA2), a potent inhibitor of vascular smooth muscle contraction and platelet aggregation. Coincident with the inhibition of TxA2 by aspirin at currently used dose regimens is a decrease in formation of prostacyclin (PGI2), an eicosanoid with opposing effects to TxA2 in vivo. The coincident inhibition of PGI2 could potentially limit the therapeutic efficacy of aspirin. This study addressed the issue as to whether a reduction in the rate of drug delivery could enhance the biochemical selectivity of aspirin toward inhibition of TxA2. Intubation studies were performed in parallel groups of healthy volunteers in which a 50-mg aspirin dose was administered as either a bolus or a 5 or 10 mg/hr infusion via a nasogastric tube. A control group received buffer solution. Systemic plasma levels of aspirin, major urinary metabolites of TxA2 and PGI2 and serum thromboxane B2 levels ex vivo were evaluated. Relative to the group receiving bolus aspirin, the slower rates of aspirin delivery increased the effective selectivity of the administered aspirin for TxA2. To investigate further this apparent selectivity, controlled release (CR) dose forms of aspirin were prepared and evaluated in a preliminary dose-ranging study in healthy subjects. The doses studied were 50 and 75 mg CR and a 75-mg aspirin solution. The CR aspirin dose forms decreased the maximal plasma concentration of aspirin relative to a bolus dose. The pharmacodynamic effects of the CR formulations were assessed via measurement of ex vivo serum thromboxane B2 formation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)