Huygens S, Dunbar A, Buil JB, Klaassen CHW, Verweij PE, van Dijk K, de Jonge N, Janssen JJWM, van der Velden WJFM, Biemond BJ, Bart A, Bruns AHW, Haas PA, Demandt AMP, Oudhuis G, von dem Borne P, van der Beek MT, Klein SK, Godschalk P, Span LFR, Postma DF, Kampinga GA, Maertens J, Lagrou K, Mercier T, Moors I, Boelens J, Selleslag D, Reynders M, Zandijk W, Doorduijn JK, Cornelissen JJ, Schauwvlieghe AFAD, and Rijnders BJA
Background: Invasive aspergillosis (IA) by a triazole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus is associated with high mortality. Real-time resistance detection will result in earlier initiation of appropriate therapy., Methods: In a prospective study, we evaluated the clinical value of the AsperGenius polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay in hematology patients from 12 centers. This PCR assay detects the most frequent cyp51A mutations in A. fumigatus conferring azole resistance. Patients were included when a computed tomography scan showed a pulmonary infiltrate and bronchoalveolar fluid (BALf) sampling was performed. The primary end point was antifungal treatment failure in patients with azole-resistant IA., Results: Of 323 patients enrolled, complete mycological and radiological information was available for 276 (94%), and probable IA was diagnosed in 99/276 (36%). Sufficient BALf for PCR testing was available for 293/323 (91%). Aspergillus DNA was detected in 116/293 (40%) and A. fumigatus DNA in 89/293 (30%). The resistance PCR was conclusive in 58/89 (65%) and resistance detected in 8/58 (14%). Two had a mixed azole-susceptible/azole-resistant infection. In the 6 remaining patients, treatment failure was observed in 1. Galactomannan positivity was associated with mortality (P = .004) while an isolated positive Aspergillus PCR was not (P = .83)., Conclusions: Real-time PCR-based resistance testing may help to limit the clinical impact of triazole resistance. In contrast, the clinical impact of an isolated positive Aspergillus PCR on BALf seems limited. The interpretation of the EORTC/MSGERC PCR criterion for BALf may need further specification (eg, minimum cycle threshold value and/or PCR positive on >1 BALf sample)., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest J. M. reports grants from Gilead Sciences, Inc; consulting fees, payment for lectures/presentations, and support for meetings/travel expenses from Gilead Sciences, Inc, MSD, Pfizer, Takeda, and F2G; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Gilead Sciences, Inc, MSD, Pfizer, Takeda, F2G, and Cidara. P. G. reports partial support for travel to Trends In Medical Mycology conference. K. L. reports grants from Thermo Fisher Scientific and TECOmedical paid to their institution; consulting fees from Gilead, MSD, and MRM Health, all paid to their institution; and personal fees for lectures/presentations for Pfizer, Gilead, and FUJIFILM Wako. M. R. reports support for travel to Trends In Medical Mycology conference. J. J. reports grants from Novartis and BMS, both paid to their institution; payment for lectures from AbbVie, Novartis, Pfizer, and Incyte; and serving as president of the Apps for Care and Science, a nonprofit organization, supported by AbbVie, Alexion, Amgen, Astellas, BMS, Daiichi-Sankyo, Janssen-Cilag, Olympus, Incyte, Sanofi Genzyme, Servier, Jazz, and Takeda. J. B. reports research grants from Gilead Sciences, Inc, and F2G. P. V. reports research grants from F2G and Gilead, paid to their institution; honoraria for lectures from F2G, Gilead, and Pfizer, all paid to their institution; and participation on a data safety monitoring board for F2G, paid to their institution. S. H. reports support from Gilead for travel to the International Society for Human and Animal Mycology 2022 conference. B. R. reports research grants from Gilead Sciences, Inc; support for meetings/travel expenses from Gilead Sciences, Inc, F2G, and Pfizer; consulting fees from F2G; payment/honoraria for lectures/presentations from Gilead Sciences, Inc; and participation on a data safety monitoring board/advisory board for Exevir. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)