1. Economic Comparison of an Empirical Versus Diagnostic-Driven Strategy for Treating Invasive Fungal Disease in Immunocompromised Patients.
- Author
-
Barnes R, Earnshaw S, Herbrecht R, Morrissey O, Slavin M, Bow E, McDade C, Charbonneau C, Weinstein D, Kantecki M, Schlamm H, and Maertens J
- Subjects
- Amphotericin B economics, Amphotericin B therapeutic use, Antifungal Agents therapeutic use, Aspergillosis diagnosis, Aspergillus isolation & purification, Caspofungin, Cost Savings, Decision Trees, Deoxycholic Acid economics, Deoxycholic Acid therapeutic use, Drug Combinations, Echinocandins economics, Echinocandins therapeutic use, Febrile Neutropenia microbiology, Galactose analogs & derivatives, Health Resources economics, Health Resources statistics & numerical data, Humans, Lipopeptides, Mannans analysis, Survival Rate, Voriconazole economics, Voriconazole therapeutic use, Antifungal Agents economics, Aspergillosis drug therapy, Aspergillosis economics, Health Care Costs, Immunocompromised Host
- Abstract
Purpose: Patients with persistent or recurrent neutropenic fevers at risk of invasive fungal disease (IFD) are treated empirically with antifungal therapy (AFT). Early treatment using a diagnostic-driven (DD) strategy may reduce clinical and economic burdens. We compared costs and outcomes of both strategies from a UK perspective., Methods: An empirical strategy with conventional amphotericin B deoxycholate (C-AmB), liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB), or caspofungin was compared with a DD strategy (initiated based on positive ELISA results for galactomannan antigen) and/or positive results for Aspergillus species on polymerase chain reaction assay) using C-AmB, voriconazole, or L-AmB in a decision-analytic model. Rates of IFD incidence, overall mortality, and IFD-related mortality in adults expected to be neutropenic for ≥10 days were obtained. The empirical strategy was assumed to identify 30% of IFD and targeted AFT to improve survival by a hazard ratio of 0.589. AFT-specific adverse events were obtained from a summary of product characteristics. Resource use was obtained, and costs were estimated by using standard UK costing sources. All costs are presented in 2012 British pounds sterling., Findings: Total costs were 32% lower for the DD strategy (£1561.29) versus the empirical strategy (£2301.93) due to a reduced incidence of adverse events and decreased use of AFT. Administration of AFT was reduced by 41% (DD strategy, 74 of 1000; empirical strategy, 125 of 1000), with similar survival rates., Implications: This study suggests that a DD strategy is likely to be cost-saving versus empirical treatment for immunocompromised patients with persistent or recurrent neutropenic fevers., (Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF