Search

Type-2 diabetes mellitus is a frequent comorbidity of cirrhosis independently associated with cirrhosis-related complications and mortality. This post hoc analysis of the ANSWER trial database assessed the effects of long-term human albumin (HA) administration on top of the standard medical treatment (SMT) on the clinical outcomes of a subgroup of 85 outpatients with liver cirrhosis, uncomplicated ascites and insulin-treated diabetes mellitus type 2 (ITDM). Compared to patients in the SMT arm, the SMT + HA group showed a better overall survival (86% vs. 57%, p = .016) and lower incidence rates of paracenteses, overt hepatic encephalopathy, bacterial infections, renal dysfunction and electrolyte disorders. Hospital admissions did not differ between the two arms, but the number of days spent in hospital was lower in the SMT + HA group. In conclusion, in a subgroup of ITDM outpatients with decompensated cirrhosis and ascites, long-term HA administration was associated with better survival and a lower incidence of cirrhosis-related complications., (© 2024 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Introduction: We assessed the impact of long-term albumin administration to hyponatremic patients with ascites enrolled in the ANSWER trial., Methods: The normalization rate of baseline hyponatremia and the 18-month incidence rate of at least moderate hyponatremia were evaluated., Results: The hyponatremia normalization rate was higher with albumin than with standard medical treatment (45% vs 28%, P = 0.042 at 1 month). Long-term albumin ensured a lower incidence of at least moderate hyponatremia than standard medical treatment (incidence rate ratio: 0.245 [CI 0.167-0.359], P < 0.001)., Discussion: Long-term albumin administration improves hyponatremia and reduces episodes of at least moderate hyponatremia in outpatients with cirrhosis and ascites., (Copyright © 2022 by The American College of Gastroenterology.)

Background & Aims: The ANSWER study reported that long-term albumin administration in patients with cirrhosis and uncomplicated ascites improves survival. During treatment, serum albumin increased within a month and remained stable thereafter. In this post hoc analysis, we aimed to determine whether on-treatment serum albumin levels could guide therapy., Methods: Logistic regression was used to assess the association between baseline serum albumin and mortality, as well as to determine on-treatment factors associated with mortality and to predict the achievement of a given on-treatment serum albumin level. Survival was assessed by Kaplan-Meier estimates and second-order polynomial regression. Patients whose on-treatment serum albumin remained below normal were compared with a subset of patients from the control arm matched by principal score., Results: Baseline serum albumin was closely associated with 18-month mortality in untreated patients; albumin treatment almost effaced this relationship. On-treatment serum albumin and MELD-Na at month 1 were the sole independent variables associated with mortality. Second-order polynomial regression revealed that survival improved in parallel with increased 1-month on-treatment serum albumin. Kaplan-Meier estimations showed that any value of 1-month on-treatment serum albumin (0.1 g/dl intervals) in the range 2.5-4.5 g/dl discriminated patient survival. In the normal range of serum albumin, the best discriminant value was 4.0 g/dl. Compared to untreated patients, survival even improved in patients whose on-treatment serum albumin remained below normal., Conclusion: Baseline serum albumin per se should not guide the decision to start albumin therapy. Conversely, 1-month on-treatment serum albumin levels are strongly associated with outcomes and could guide the use of albumin - 4.0 g/dl being the target threshold. However, even patients whose serum albumin remains below normal benefit from long-term albumin administration., Lay Summary: The ANSWER study has shown that long-term albumin administration improves survival and prevents the occurrence of major complications in patients with cirrhosis and ascites. This study shows that the achievement of these beneficial effects is related to a significant increase in serum albumin concentration. Even though the best results follow the achievement of a serum albumin concentration of 4 g/dl, a survival benefit is also achieved in patients who fail to normalise serum albumin., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest PC is part of the speakers' bureau for Grifols SA, Octapharma AG, Baxalta, and Kedrion Biopharma, is consultant for Kedrion Biopharma, is on the advisory board for Grifols SA, and has a research grant from Octapharma AG. MT is part of the speakers' bureau for Grifols SA and Octapharma AG. GZ is part of the speakers' bureau for Octapharma. OR is part of speakers' bureau for Baxalta. PA is part of the speakers' bureau for Baxalta and Kedrion Biopharma. PT is part of the speakers' bureau for Grifols and Kedrion Biopharma. MBa is part of the speakers' bureau Octapharma AG. MBe is part of the speakers' bureau for Grifols SA, Octapharma AG, Baxalta, CLS Behring GmbH, and PPTA, and is a consultant for CLS Behring GmbH, Grifols SA and Baxalta. All other authors have no competing interests. Please refer to the accompanying ICMJE disclosure forms for further details., (Copyright © 2020 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Management of decompensated cirrhosis is currently geared towards the treatment of complications once they occur. To date there is no established disease-modifying therapy aimed at halting progression of the disease and preventing the development of complications in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. The design of clinical trials to investigate new therapies for patients with decompensated cirrhosis is complex. The population of patients with decompensated cirrhosis is heterogeneous (i.e., different etiologies, comorbidities and disease severity), leading to the inclusion of diverse populations in clinical trials. In addition, primary endpoints selected for trials that include patients with decompensated cirrhosis are not homogeneous and at times may not be appropriate. This leads to difficulties in comparing results obtained from different trials. Against this background, the LiverHope Consortium organized a meeting of experts, the goal of which was to develop recommendations for the design of clinical trials and to define appropriate endpoints, both for trials aimed at modifying the natural history and preventing progression of decompensated cirrhosis, as well as for trials aimed at managing the individual complications of cirrhosis., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest ES, CA, RH, EP, SM, CF, RM have nothing to declare. The other authors declare the following: PG has participated on advisory boards for the following: Grifols, Gilead, Intercept, Mallinckrodt and Ferring. He has received Investigator promoted research grants from Mallinckrodt, Gilead and Grifols. All outside the submitted work. SM research group has received consultancy fees and/or research donations from Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH, Norgine, Alfasigma and Umecrine Cognition. VV speaking fees from Intercept Pharmaceuticals; advisory board fees from Promethera Biosciences PC Grifols SA: advisory board, speaking bureau; Octapharma. SA: speaking bureau; Takeda SA: speaking bureau. JT: reports other from - Gore, Bayer, Alexion, MSD, Gilead, Intercept, Norgine, Grifols, Versantis, Martin Pharmaceuticals outside the submitted work. PSK is Principal Investigator of the Sequana Medical sponsored POSEIDON study in North America. He does not receive any personal remuneration. HW declares he is currently and employee of EVOTEC and has shares in Sanofi, both of which are unrelated to the work submitted. JGA reports grants from Gilead, lecture fees from Ferring, and consulting fees from Gilead, Pfizer, Intercept, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Lupin and Genfit outside the submitted work. UB Research funding from South African PSC Patient Foundation, Netherlands gastroenterology and hepatology (MDLS) Foundation, Investigator initiated research funding from Intercept, USA. AK Speaker and advisory board: Norgine, Siemens. Please refer to the accompanying ICMJE disclosure forms for further details., (Copyright © 2020 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Albumin is currently employed as a plasma expander to prevent and treat specific complications of cirrhosis with ascites, such as the prevention of paracentesis-induced circulatory dysfunction and renal dysfunction induced by spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, as well as the diagnosis and treatment of acute kidney injury and hepatorenal syndrome. Recently, evidence has shown that long-term albumin administration in patients with decompensated cirrhosis reduces mortality and incidence of complications, eases the management of ascites, is cost effective, and has a good safety profile.

Background: Evidence is scarce on the efficacy of long-term human albumin (HA) administration in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. The human Albumin for the treatmeNt of aScites in patients With hEpatic ciRrhosis (ANSWER) study was designed to clarify this issue., Methods: We did an investigator-initiated multicentre randomised, parallel, open-label, pragmatic trial in 33 academic and non-academic Italian hospitals. We randomly assigned patients with cirrhosis and uncomplicated ascites who were treated with anti-aldosteronic drugs (≥200 mg/day) and furosemide (≥25 mg/day) to receive either standard medical treatment (SMT) or SMT plus HA (40 g twice weekly for 2 weeks, and then 40 g weekly) for up to 18 months. The primary endpoint was 18-month mortality, evaluated as difference of events and analysis of survival time in patients included in the modified intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations. This study is registered with EudraCT, number 2008-000625-19, and ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01288794., Findings: From April 2, 2011, to May 27, 2015, 440 patients were randomly assigned and 431 were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. 38 of 218 patients died in the SMT plus HA group and 46 of 213 in the SMT group. Overall 18-month survival was significantly higher in the SMT plus HA than in the SMT group (Kaplan-Meier estimates 77% vs 66%; p=0·028), resulting in a 38% reduction in the mortality hazard ratio (0·62 [95% CI 0·40-0·95]). 46 (22%) patients in the SMT group and 49 (22%) in the SMT plus HA group had grade 3-4 non-liver related adverse events., Interpretation: In this trial, long-term HA administration prolongs overall survival and might act as a disease modifying treatment in patients with decompensated cirrhosis., Funding: Italian Medicine Agency., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The development and progression of ascites represent a crucial event in the natural history of patients with cirrhosis, predisposing them to other complications and carrying a heavy impact on prognosis. The current standard of care for the management of ascites relies on various combinations of diuretics and large-volume paracenteses. Periodic long-term albumin infusions on top of diuretics have been recently shown to greatly facilitate the management of ascites. The insertion of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS), an artificial connection between the portal and caval systems, is indicated to treat patients with refractory ascites. TIPS acts to decrease portal hypertension, thus targeting an upstream event in the pathophysiological cascade of cirrhosis decompensation. Available evidence shows a significant benefit on ascites control/resolution, with less clear results on patient survival. Patient selection plays a crucial role in obtaining better clinical responses and avoiding TIPS-related adverse events, the most important of which are hepatic encephalopathy, cardiac overload and failure, and liver failure. At the same time, some recent technical evolutions of available stents appear promising but deserve further investigations. Future challenges and perspectives include (i) identifying the features for selecting the ideal candidate to TIPS; (ii) recognizing the better timing for TIPS placement; and (iii) understanding the most appropriate role of TIPS within the framework of all other available treatments for the management of patients with decompensated cirrhosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aims: The PREDICT study recently showed that acutely decompensated (AD) patients with cirrhosis can present three different clinical phenotypes in the 90 days after admission: (1) pre‐ACLF, developing acute‐on‐chronic liver failure (ACLF); (2) unstable decompensated cirrhosis (UDC), being re‐admitted for AD without ACLF and (3) stable decompensated cirrhosis (SDC), not presenting readmission or ACLF. This study aimed to externally validate the existence of these three distinct trajectories and to identify predictors for the occurrence of each trajectory. Methods: Baseline data, 3‐month ACLF and readmission incidence and 1‐year survival were analysed in a prospective cohort of patients admitted for AD. A multinomial multivariable model was used to evaluate the association between baseline features and clinical trajectories. Results: Of the 311 patients enrolled, 55% met the criteria for SDC, 18% for UDC and 27% for pre‐ACLF, presenting a significantly different 1‐year mortality: pre‐ACLF 65%, UDC 46%, SDC 21% (p <.001). The presence of hepatic encephalopathy (HE) was associated with UDC (p =.043), while the absence of ascites to SDC (p =.017). Among laboratory parameters, an increase in MELD‐Na (p =.001) and C‐reactive protein (p =.009) and a decrease in haemoglobin (p =.004) and albumin (p =.008) levels were associated with pre‐ACLF. Conclusion: The present study confirms that AD patients have three different clinical trajectories with different mortality rates. Besides the severity of cirrhosis, the association with C‐reactive protein supports the predominant role of systemic inflammation in ACLF pathophysiology. Finally, HE is associated with the UDC phenotype highlighting the need for better management of this complication after discharge. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Besides being a plasma-expander, albumin has many non-oncotic properties. • Hypoalbuminemia is a universal independent factor of poor prognosis. • Albumin is widely used in medicine, but only few indications are endorsed by guidelines. • Solid evidence supports albumin for treating/preventing some complications of cirrhosis. • Educational and regulatory policies should be implemented to avoid a futile use of albumin. Albumin is the most abundant circulating protein and provides about 70% of the plasma oncotic power. The molecule also carries many other biological functions (binding, transport and detoxification of endogenous and exogenous compounds, antioxidation, and modulation of inflammatory and immune responses). Hypoalbuminemia is a frequent finding in many diseases, representing usually only a biomarker of poor prognosis rather than a primary pathophysiological event. Despite that, albumin is prescribed in many conditions based on the assumption that correction of hypoalbuminemia would lead to clinical benefits for the patients. Unfortunately, many of these indications are not supported by scientific evidence (or have been even disproved), so that a large part of albumin use is nowadays still inappropriate. Decompensated cirrhosis is the clinical area where albumin administration has been extensively studied and solid recommendations can be made. Besides prevention and treatment of acute complications, long-term albumin administration in patients with ascites has emerged in the last decade has a potential new disease-modifying treatment. In non-hepatological settings, albumin is widely used for fluid resuscitation in sepsis and critical illnesses, with no clear superiority over crystalloids. In many other conditions, scientific evidence supporting albumin prescription is weak or even absent. Thus, given its high cost and limited availability, action is needed to avoid the use of albumin for inappropriate and futile indications to ensure its availability in those conditions for which albumin has been demonstrated to have a real effectiveness and an advantage for the patient. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The use of albumin in patients with cirrhosis has been extensively discussed over recent years. Current treatment approaches depend on targeting related complications, aiming to treat and/or prevent circulatory dysfunction, bacterial infections and multi-organ failure. Albumin has been shown to prolong survival and reduce complications in patients with cirrhosis. This review aims to ascertain whether the use of albumin is justified in patients with cirrhosis. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses evaluating albumin use in patients with cirrhosis published between 1985 and February 2020 was conducted; the quality and risk of bias of the included studies were assessed. In total, 45 RCTs and 10 meta-analyses were included. Based on the included evidence, albumin is superior at preventing and controlling the incidence of cirrhosis complications vs other plasma expanders. Recent studies reported that long-term albumin administration to patients with decompensated cirrhosis improves survival with a 38% reduction in the mortality hazard ratio compared with standard medical treatment alone. Albumin infusions are justified for routine use in patients with cirrhosis, and the use of albumin either alone or in combination with other treatments leads to clinical benefits. Long-term administration of albumin should be considered in some patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ascites represents a critical event in the natural history of liver cirrhosis. From a prognostic perspective, its occurrence marks the transition from the compensated to the decompensated stage of the disease, leading to an abrupt worsening of patients' life expectancy. Moreover, ascites heralds a turbulent clinical course, characterized by acute events and further complications, frequent hospitalizations, and eventually death. The pathophysiology of ascites classically relies on hemodynamic mechanisms, with effective hypovolemia as the pivotal event. Recent discoveries, however, integrated this hypothesis, proposing systemic inflammation and immune system dysregulation as key mechanisms. The mainstays of ascites treatment are represented by anti-mineralocorticoids and loop diuretics, and large volume paracentesis. When ascites reaches the stage of refractoriness, however, diuretics administration should be cautious due to the high risk of adverse events, and patients should be treated with periodic execution of paracentesis or with the placement of a trans-jugular intra-hepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). TIPS reduces portal hypertension, eases ascites control, and potentially modify the clinical course of the disease. Further studies are required to expand its indications and improve the management of complications. Long-term human albumin administration has been studied in two RCTs, with contradictory results, and remains a debated issue worldwide, despite a potential effectiveness both in ascites control and long-term survival. Other treatments (vaptans, vasoconstrictors, or implantable drainage systems) present some promising aspects but cannot be currently recommended outside clinical protocols or a case-by-case evaluation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The current therapeutic strategies for the management of patients with cirrhosis rely on the prevention or treatment of specific complications. The removal of the causative agents (i.e., viruses or alcohol) prevents decompensation in the vast majority of patients with compensated cirrhosis. In contrast, even when etiological treatment has been effective, a significant proportion of patients with decompensated cirrhosis remains at risk of further disease progression. Therefore, therapies targeting specific key points in the complex pathophysiological cascade of decompensated cirrhosis could represent a new approach for the management of these severely ill patients. Some of the interventions currently employed for treating or preventing specific complications of cirrhosis or used in other diseases (i.e., poorly absorbable oral antibiotics, statins, albumin) have been proposed as potential disease-modifying agents in cirrhosis (DMAC) since clinical studies have shown their capacity of improving survival. Additional multicenter, large randomized clinical trials are awaited to confirm these promising results. Finally, new drugs able to antagonize key pathophysiological mechanisms are under pre-clinical development or at the initial stages of clinical assessment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Albumin is a negatively charged, relatively small protein synthesized by liver cells. Is the most abundant protein in extracellular fluid and accounts for about 70% of the plasma colloid osmotic pressure. Therefore it plays a crucial role in regulating fluid distribution in the body. In addition, albumin possesses functional domains with important non-oncotic properties, such as potent anti-oxydant and scavenging activities, binding of highly toxic reactive metal species and a great amount of endogenous and exogenous substances. We have recently learned that albumin in cirrhosis undergoes a number of post-transcriptional changes that greatly impair its non-oncotic properties. The overall assessment of these changes clearly shows that the relative abundance of the native form of albumin is significantly reduced in hospitalized patients with cirrhosis and that these abnormalities worsen in parallel with the increasing severity of the disease. Thus, it is time to abandon the concept of serum albumin concentration and refer to the effective albumin concentration , that is the native intact albumin. Given the pathophysiological context in which we use human albumin in patients with cirrhosis, who are characterized by peripheral vasodilation and a low-grade but sustained inflammatory state, the use of albumin in patients with cirrhosis should aim at enhancing effective hypovolemia and exploiting its antioxidant and scavenging activities. The indications for the use of albumin in cirrhosis that clearly emerge from evidence-based medicine are represented by conditions characterized by an acute aggravation of effective hypovolemia and inflammation, such as such post-paracentesis circulatory dysfunction, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, and hepatorenal syndrome. Other indications to the use of albumin that still require further studies are represented by bacterial infections other than spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, hepatic encephalopathy and long-term treatment of ascites, which has been debated for the last half-century. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]