Search

Hazra, Ashis Kumar, Jana, Debanjan, Smith, Graeme (2023): A new species of the genus Acrotelsella (Zygentoma: Lepismatidae) from Jhargram West Bengal, India. Zootaxa 5227 (5): 594-600, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5227.5.6

Genus Allacrotelsa Silvestri, 1935 Type species: Ctenolepisma kraepelini Escherich, 1905., Published as part of Kaplin, V. G., 2023, A new species of the silverfish genus Allacrotelsa Silvestri, 1935 (Zygentoma: Lepismatidae) from Crimea, pp. 19-28 in Far Eastern Entomologist 471 on page 20, DOI: 10.25221/fee.471.2, http://zenodo.org/record/7616324, {"references":["Silvestri, F. 1935. Marquesan Thysanura. Bulletin of the Bernice Pauahi Bishop Museum,","Escherich, K. 1905. Das System der Lepismatiden. Zoologica (Stuttgart), 18 (43): 1 - 164."]}

Kaplin, V.G. (2023): A new species of the silverfish genus Allacrotelsa Silvestri, 1935 (Zygentoma: Lepismatidae) from Crimea. Far Eastern Entomologist 471: 19-28, DOI: 10.25221/fee.471.2, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.25221/fee.471.2

Acrotelsella jhargramensis sp. n. (Figures 1–18, Table 1) Type material. Holotype male under the bark of a Sal tree (Shorea robusta), Bandarbhola, Jhargram, West Bengal, India [22°25′38″ N, 87°15′37″ E, elevation 82 m], 21.xi.2019, 1 male, coll. Dr. A. K. Hazra & D. Jana, Registration number 3144/H14, Zoological Survey of India, Kolkata. Paratype male, same date and locality as holotype, Registration number 3145/H14, Zoological Survey of India, Kolkata. Etymology. The species is named after the type locality, the district Jhargram, West Bengal, India. Diagnosis. Apical article of labial palps with high number of sensory papillae (10‒12); labrum with macrosetae not arranged in bushes; trichobothria lacking from the most posterior comb of the mesonotum; prosternum with 4+4 bristle combs of macrosetae, mesosternum with 2+2 bristle combs of macrosetae and metasternum with 1+1 bristle combs of macrosetae. Urotergite X acutely triangular (44°) with sharp and pointed apex; two pairs of abdominal styli. Description. Holotype male body length 12.4 mm in life, mottled brown with dark annulated antennae and caudal appendages (Fig. 1). Base colour (in alcohol) dorsally brownish yellow with a covering of light brown scales, ventrally whitish yellow. Shape of the body elongate, more or less parallel-sided, dorsoventrally compressed anteriorly, sub-cylindrical posteriorly; thorax slightly wider than abdomen (Fig. 2). Faintly brownish but distinct pigment on the segments of the maxillary palp. Antennae and caudal appendages with alternate dark and light bands of brown pigmentation. Antennal length 16.9 mm, longer than body and surpassing the body by 1.3 times when directed backwards. Near base, flagellomeres with one annulus; ninth interval composed of two annuli; most distal part of the antennae with eight annuli in each flagellomere; fifth annulus in each interval a dark ring. Oval scales present on both the scape and pedicel, basiconic sensilla present on apical flagellomeres. Head semi-circular in outline anteriorly; frons bearing two very conspicuous tufts of stout cephalic setae, pectinate and radially arranged. Numerous bifid and pectinate macrosetae present on both clypeus and labrum, those of the clypeus grouped in two tufts composed of 30‒32 macrosetae each and those on the labrum scattered over the outer third (Fig. 3). Eyes relatively small, located well behind the antennae. Head wider (1.42 mm) than long (0.98 mm). Maxillary palp (Fig. 4) five-segmented; terminal segment (0.45 mm) longer than penultimate segment (0.34 mm). Apical segment of labial palp (Figs. 5, 6) bearing ten horizontal sensory papillae on left labial palp and twelve horizontal sensory papillae on right labial palp, arranged in single rows; apical segment about 2.4× wider at the apex than at the base and 1.5× wider than long. Medial part of the pronotal collar (Fig. 7) composed of two rows of macrosetae, lateral regions with a single row of smooth macrosetae. Lateral margins of pronotum with 7+7 combs composed of 1−2 macrosetae each. Two trichobothrial areas on each side, associated with the inner end of the last comb (N) and between the two macrochaetae of N-3. Lateral margins of mesonotum (Fig. 8) with 12+11 combs each consisting of 1−3 macrosetae, including one trichobothrium between the macrochaeta and the margin of N-2; no macrochaetae associated with the trichobothrium of the most posterior lateral combs of the mesonotum. Lateral margins of metanotum (Fig. 9) with 10+10 combs composed of 1−3 macrosetae, including two trichobothrial areas, the trichobothrium located on the inner side of comb N and between the macrochaeta and the margin of comb N−1. Hind borders of pro, meso and metanota with 1+1 submedial bristle combs composed of five macrosetae each, the two pronotal combs separated by about 0.4× the width of the pronotum. Prosternum (Fig. 10) 1.4 mm long, length/width ratio about 0.9, subtriangular, posteriorly rounded; posteriorly with 4+4 bristle combs each composed of 2−5 macrosetae. Mesosternum (Fig. 11) 1.7 mm long, length/width ratio about 0.9, rounded-triangular in shape, with 2+2 posterior bristle combs each composed of four macrosetae. Metasternum 1.4 mm long, length/width ratio about 0.7; posterior margin broadly rounded with 1+1 bristle combs, each composed of seven macrosetae (Fig 12); distance between metasternal combs 5.4× the width of a comb. Legs stout; femora moderate in size; tibiae and tarsi moderately elongate; pretarsi with slightly curved claws (Fig. 13). Scales present on coxae, femora, tibia and first tarsomere (Fig. 14). Length/width ratio of protibia about 2.5× longer than wide; protibia with two macrosetae inserted on dorsal margin, six macrosetae on ventral margin. Lengths of fore tarsomeres I‒IV 0.41, 0.13, 0.18 and 0.2 mm, respectively. Mesotibia 2.9× longer than wide, with two dorsal and five ventral macrosetae. Lengths of middle tarsomeres I‒IV 0.51, 0.16, 0.19 and 0.22 mm, respectively. Metatibia about 3.3× longer than wide, with two dorsal and four ventral macrosetae. Lengths of hind tarsomeres 0.71, 0.16, 0.21 and 0.26 mm, respectively. Urotergite I with 1+1 bristle-combs, each composed of five macrosetae; urotergites II−VII with 3+3 bristlecombs, each composed of 4−10 macrosetae; urotergite VIII with 2+2 bristle-combs, each composed of 4−12 macrosetae. Urotergite IX without bristle combs. The number of macrosetae per bristle comb on urotergites given in Table 1. Urotergite X (Fig. 15) triangular with sharply pointed apex; length 0.14 mm, length/width ratio about 1.2, with 4+4 bristle-combs of 2−4 macrosetae each. Urosternites I and II without setae, III−VIII with 1+1 lateral bristle-combs, each composed of 13−15 macrosetae. Width of the bristle combs and the gap between them varying on each urosternite; ratio of the distance between the combs and the width of a comb ranges from 3.0 on urosternite VIII to 6.2 on urosternite IV (Fig. 16). Two pairs of styli present, inserted on segments VIII (Fig. 17) and IX (Fig.18), both covered with scales. Styli IX length 1.4× that of styli VIII. Posterior margin of coxite VIII between the combs almost straight. Inner process of coxite IX long, triangular and pointed at tip with the angle of the posterior point (44°), about 1.6× longer than wide at its base and 1.8× longer than the outer process. Penis shape typical for the subfamily; length 0.53 mm, length/width ratio 0.8. Length of caudal filament up to 9.7 mm, that of cerci up to 9.9 mm. Most distal flagellomere of the caudal appendages with eight annuli, major macrochaetae restricted to the most distal annulus. Scales present on annuli 2, 4 and 6. Pigment absent from the most distal and most basal annuli of each flagellomere resulting in the banded appearance. Distribution and habitat. The specimens belonging to this new species were found under the bark of Sal trees (Shorea robusta) of Bandarbhola at Jhargram, West Bengal, India. Red laterite is the predominant soil in the district, supporting undergrowth of various types of herbs and shrubs on the forest floor. The weather is extremely humid and tropical. There are large numbers of termite mounds present on the forest floor.

Identification key to Ctenolepisma s. str. species from India 1. Urotergite VII with 3+3 bristle-combs.................................................................... 6 - Urotergite VII with 2+2 bristle-combs.................................................................... 2 2. Urotergite VI with 3+3 bristle-combs..................................................................... 4 - Urotergite VI with 2+2 bristle-combs..................................................................... 3 3. Urotergite X without well-defined bristle-combs........................................ Ctenolepisma (C.) nigrum - Urotergite X with 1+1 bristle-combs............................................... Ctenolepisma (Ct.) tripurense 4. Prosternum with only 1+1 small bristle-combs consisting in a row of 3‒4 macrosetae. Ovipositor with fewer than 30 divisions.................................................................... Ctenolepisma (C.) udumalpetense sp. n. - Prosternum with at least 2+2 bristle-combs, frequently with more than 5 macrosetae each. Ovipositor with more than 35 divisions............................................................................................ 5 5. Epidermic pigment absent or yellowish. Caudal filaments and antennae as long as or longer than body length. Lateral margins of prosternum convex...................................................... Ctenolepisma (C.) longicaudatum - Epidermic pigment intense, especially in appendages, usually purplish brown. Caudal filaments shorter than body length, antennae at most as long as body. Lateral margins of prosternum straight.................... Ctenolepisma (C.) ciliatum 6. Infralateral combs of urotergites broad, composed of about 15 macrosetae. Apex of the ovipositor acute. Adult specimens reaching 15 mm in length......................................................... Ctenolepisma (C.) alticola - Infralateral combs of urotergites smaller, with 3‒8 macrosetae.Apex of the ovipositor rounded. Adult specimens smaller, length upto 9 mm.......................................................................................... 7 7. Labial palp bearing three sensory papillae. Ovipositor with 70 divisions............... Ctenolepisma (C.) boettgerianum - Labial palp bears nine sensory papillae. Ovipositor with 54‒56 divisions......... Ctenolepisma (C.) venkataramani sp. n., Published as part of Hazra, Ashis Kumar, Jana, Debanjan, Mandal, Guru Pada & Molero-Baltanás, Rafael, 2022, On two new species of the genus Ctenolepisma (Zygentoma: Lepismatidae) from India, pp. 59-68 in Zootaxa 5222 (1) on pages 67-68, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5222.1.4, http://zenodo.org/record/7456435

Hazra, Ashis Kumar, Jana, Debanjan, Mandal, Guru Pada, Molero-Baltanás, Rafael (2022): On two new species of the genus Ctenolepisma (Zygentoma: Lepismatidae) from India. Zootaxa 5222 (1): 59-68, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5222.1.4

Ctenolepisma (Ctenolepisma) venkataramani sp. n. (Figures 1−17, Table 1) Type material. Holotype: Under leaf litter near the East Thiopathak Waterfalls, Sri Venkateshwara National Park, Andhra Pradesh, India [13°45’4” N, 79°20’16” E], 17.vii.2000, 1 female, coll. A.K. Hazra, Registration number 3051/H14, Zoological Survey of India, Kolkata. Paratypes: Same locality as holotype, 17.vii.2000, 9 examples. (6 males and 3 females), coll. A.K. Hazra, Registration number 3052/H14, Zoological Survey of India, Kolkata. Etymology. The species is named after Dr. K. Venkataraman, former Director of Zoological Survey of India, Kolkata for inspiration to explore the Indian Zygentoma. Diagnosis. Apical article of labial palps with an unusually high number of sensory papillae (nine). Trichobothria of nota arranged as in C. ciliatum. All thoracic sternites with 1+1 subapical bristle-combs of macrosetae. Urotergite I with 1+1, II-VII with 3+3 and VIII with 2+2 bristle combs. Urosternites I and II without setae, III–VIII with 1+1 lateral bristle combs. Urotergal combs with 4−8 macrosetae and urosternal combs with 8−9 macrosetae each. Urotergite X trapezoidal, similar to that of C. boettgerianum Paclt, 1961. Two pairs of abdominal styli. Ovipositor with 54−56 divisions. Description. Body length of female up to 8.8 mm; of male up to 7.8 mm. Base colour (in spirit) dorsally whitish yellow with a covering of light brown scales, ventrally whitish yellow. Shape of the body elongate, more or less parallel sided, dorso-ventrally compressed anteriorly, sub-cylindrical posteriorly; thorax slightly wider than abdomen (Fig. 1). Faintly brownish pigments distinct on sides and apical border of scapus and antennae, on second and third segment of maxillary palp; lateral margins of labial palp; upper part of coxa, lower part of trochanter, entire lateral margin of femur and outer margin of tibia; styli IX all along their length. Caudal appendages with uniform brown pigmentation, not arranged in alternating dark and light bands. Head semi-circular in outline anteriorly; frons bearing two very conspicuous tufts of stout cephalic setae, pectinate and radially arranged. Numerous bifid and pectinate macrosetae present in both clypeus and labrum; those of the clypeus are grouped in two tufts composed of 28−32 each (Fig. 2). Eyes relatively small, located well behind antennae. Head wider (1.17 mm) than long (0.58 mm). Antenna length up to 5.4 mm, shorter than body and reaching the sixth abdominal segment when directed backwards. Maxillary palp (Fig. 3) slender, five-segmented, last article slightly longer (0.39 mm) than penultimate (0.37 mm). Apical article of labial palp (Fig. 4) sub-globular in shape and bearing nine sensory papillae arranged in a single row; it is about 2.7 times wider at the apex than at the base and 1.1 times wider than long. Anterolateral row of the pronotum (Fig. 5) composed of a single row of bifid and smooth macrosetae. Pronotal collar with oblique sub-parallel rows of 3−5 macrosetae. Lateral margins with 8+8 combs composed of 2‒3 macrosetae each. Two trichobothrial areas on each side, associated to the inner side of the last comb (N) and to inner side of the N-3 comb; trichoid sensilla inserted on the outer side of the combs N and N−1 and on inner side of N-2, N-4, N-5 and N-6. Mesonotum (Fig. 6) lateral margins with 11 combs each consisting of 2−3 macrosetae, including two trichobothrial areas, one in the inner side of the last comb (N) and one in the outer side of the N-2 comb; trichoid sensilla present in the outer side of N-1 and in the inner side of N-3, N-4 and N-5. Metanotum (Fig. 7) lateral margins with 9+9 combs composed of 2‒3 macrosetae. Trichobothrial areas situated in the inner sides of the combs N and N-1; trichoid sensilla inserted on the outer side of combs N-1, N-2, N-5 and N-6 and on the inner side of combs N-2, N-3 and N-4. Hind borders of pro-, meso- and metanota with 1+1 bristle combs composed of 3−4 macrosetae each. Prosternum (Fig. 8) 1.2 mm long, its length/width ratio about 1, subtriangular, posteriorly elliptical in shape; apical part with 1+1 bristle combs each composed of 4 macrosetae. Mesosternum (Fig. 9) 1.4 mm long, its length/ width ratio about 1.1, semi-elliptical in shape, with rounded apex and 1+1 subapical bristle combs each composed of 4 macrosetae. Metasternum 1.3 mm long, length/width ratio about 0.9; posterior margin broadly rounded, with 1+1 bristle combs each composed of 4 macrosetae (Fig 10); the distance between these combs about 5 times the width of a comb. Legs stout; femora short, one strong seta on outer margin distally near the junction of tibiae; tibiae and tarsi moderately elongated; pretarsi with slightly curved claws (Figs. 11 and 12). Coxae and femora with scales. Protibia about 2.4 times longer than wide, with two macrosetae inserted in the dorsal margin and four macrosetae in the ventral margin. Protarsal tarsomere I length about 0.32 mm; tarsomere II, about 0.09 mm; tarsomere III, about 0.17 mm; tarsomere IV, about 0.12 mm. Mesotibia 2.7 times longer than wide, with two dorsal and three ventral macrosetae. Lengths of tarsomeres I, II, III and IV (in mm) on mesotarsus as follows: 0.41, 0.12, 0.15, 0.16. Metatibiae (Fig. 12) about 3 times longer than wide, with four dorsal and six ventral macrosetae. In the metatarsus, the length of tarsomere I is about 0.63 mm; of tarsomere II is about 0.13 mm; of tarsomere III is about 0.18 mm and of tarsomere IV is about 0.21 mm. Urotergite I with 1+1 bristle-combs, each composed of 4−5 macrosetae. Urotergites II−VII with 3+3 bristlecombs, each composed of 4−8 macrosetae, and urotergite VIII with 2+2 bristle-combs, each composed of 6−7 macrosetae. Urotergite IX without bristle combs. Urotergite X (Fig. 13) shorter than the width at its base, subtrapezoidal, short, with rounded posterolateral corners and faintly emarginated hind border with 1+1 prominent bristle-combs, each composed of 7 macrosetae. Urosternites I and II without setae, III−VIII with 1+1 lateral bristle-combs, each composed of (6)8-9 macrosetae. The width of the bristle combs and the gap distances between them varies in each urosternite, so that the ratio between the distance between the combs and the width of a comb varies from 8 on urosternite VII to 15 on urosternite III (Fig. 14). Both sexes with two pairs of styli, inserted on segments VIII (Fig. 15) and IX. In female, the ratio length of styli IX/ length of styli VIII about 1.2. Posterior margin of the coxite VIII round. Inner process of coxite IX triangular and pointed at tip, in the female about 1.5 times longer than wide at its base and 4 times longer than the outer process. Ovipositor very long, with 54−56 divisions, surpassing the apex of the inner process of the coxite IX by 4.3 times the length of this process (Fig. 16). Apical parts of gonapophyses not sclerotized, both the anterior and posterior regions with fine bristles; anterior region with two long setae (Fig. 17). Caudal filaments long but broken and incomplete on type material. Distribution and habitat. Specimens of Ctenolepisma venkataramani sp. n. were found in large numbers generally in shady, semi-decomposed leaf litter and under stones beside East Thiopathak Waterfalls at Sri Venkateshwara National Park. The species is supposed to be abundant in this tropical forest of Indian Deccan plateau. The conservation of this habitat will protect this Zygentoma species. Differential diagnosis. This new species is close to Ctenolepisma (Ctenolepisma) boettgerianum, as they have similar abdominal chaetotaxy (urotergite I with 1+1, II‒VII with 3+3 and VIII with 2+2 bristle combs; urosternites I and II without setae, III–VIII with 1+1 bristle combs), similar trapezoidal shape of the tenth urotergite and similar size. They differ in the characters presented in Table 1. The most remarkable character of the new species is the presence of an unusually high number of sensory papillae (nine) on the apical article of the labial palp, a condition that can be occasionally found in C. longicaudatum Escherich, 1905. In this latter species the number of papillae is variable, and most specimens bear the typical number (five), arranged as usual in a single row. However, C. longicaudatum is different because of its urotergal setation (3+3 combs in urotergite II‒VI), larger size (up to 15 mm or more), greater length of appendages and lighter epidermal pigment. Compared with other Indian species of the genus, there are 2 species of the subgenus Ctenolepisma s. str. bearing 3+3 combs on urotergites II‒VII and a trapezoidal tenth urotergite that are also present in some parts of Asia: C. mauritanicum (Lucas, 1846) and C. przewalskyi Kaplin, 1982. These species are easily distinguishable from C. venkataramani sp. n. as they have 2 or more pairs of bristle-combs in their prosternum (only one pair in the new species), and their ovipositor has a lower number of divisions (about 40 or less).

Ctenolepisma (Ctenolepisma) udumalpetense sp. n. (Figures 18−38) Type material. Holotype: Forest floor beside Trimurti dam, Udumalpet, Tiruppur district, Tamil Nadu, India (10°29’11” N and 77°9’46” E), 17.ix.2019, 1 female, coll. A.K. Hazra, Registration number 3053/H14, Zoological Survey of India, Kolkata. Paratypes: Same locality as holotype, 18.ix.2019, 22 (12 males 10 females), coll. A.K. Hazra, Registration number 3054/H14, Zoological Survey of India, Kolkata. Etymology. The species is named after the name of the locality Udumalpet, Tiruppur district, Tamil Nadu, India, which is the type locality. Diagnosis. This new species is a relatively small Ctenolepisma s. str. (about 6 mm long) with five sensory papillae on the apical articles of their labial palps. Their trichobothrial areas are arranged as in C. ciliatum. It has 1+1 bristle-combs of macrosetae in each thoracic sternite, 3+3 bristle-combs in urotergites II-VI, trapezoidal urotergite X and two pairs of abdominal styli. Ovipositor short, with less than 30 divisions. As in related species, tibial scales are absent, but femoral scales are narrower than usual (not widely rounded, but ovoid or elliptical). Description. Body length of females up to 6.1 mm, males slightly shorter (5.8 mm). Habitus (Fig. 18) fusiform, with the thorax slightly wider (1.19 mm) than the abdomen base (1 mm). Body pigment dark, uniformly distributed; antennae with evenly distributed light pigmentation but terminal filaments show distinct light and dark annulations. Scales dorsally dark brown. Ventral scales lighter pigmented. Body scales are rounded, fan-shaped and ovoid (Fig. 19) Macrosetae bifid, plumose; chaetotaxy of head as usual for the genus. Both clypeus and labrum with numerous bifid and pectinate macrosetae. Clypeus with two tufts of setae, each composed of 32–34 macrosetae. In the middle of the clypeus, a tuft of smooth hair-like setae present composed of 14 setae (Fig. 20). Eyes black, composed of 12 ommatidia. Antennal length up to 4 mm, shorter than body, surpassing the thorax up to abdominal segment six when directed backwards. Apical article of maxillary palp (Fig. 21) slightly longer (0.34 mm) than the penultimate (0.31 mm). Apical article of the labial palp about as wide (0.24 mm) as long (0.23 mm), with 5 distinct ovoid sensory papillae arranged in a compact single row (Figs. 22, 23). Medial part of the pronotal collar (Fig. 24) composed of 3–4 rows of macrosetae, lateral regions each with a single row of smooth macrosetae. Lateral margins of pronotum (Fig. 25) with 6+5 combs composed of 1–3 macrosetae each, including two trichobothrial areas, one in the inner side of the last comb (N) and another in the inner side of the N-3 comb. Mesonotum (Fig. 26) lateral margins with 8+8 combs consisting of 1–3 macrosetae; only one trichobothrial area in the outer side of the N-1 comb observed. Metanotum (Fig. 27) lateral margins with 6+6 combs composed of 1–3 macrosetae; trichobothria not seen. Hind borders of pro-, meso- and metanota with 1+1 bristle combs composed of 1–2 macrosetae each. Thoracic sternites as in Figs. 28–30. Prosternum 0.65 mm long, its length/width ratio about 0.9, with rounded posterior apex; postero-lateral margin with 1+1 bristle combs, each composed of 3–4 macrosetae. Mesosternum 0.84 mm long, its length/width ratio about 1.1, slightly wider than prosternum; its posterior apex rounded with 1+1 bristle combs, each composed of 3 macrosetae. Metasternum 0.82 mm long, its length/width ratio about 0.9; with broadly rounded apex, with 1+1 bristle combs, each composed of 5 macrosetae; the distance between these combs about 5 times the width of a comb. Scales present on coxae and femora (Figs. 31 and 32); femoral scales (Fig.–33) smaller than coxal ones, elliptical and with rounded apical margin. Length/width ratio of protibia about 2.4; of mesotibia about 2.5 and of metatibia about 2.8. Two macrosetae present in the dorsal margin of the protibia and three macrosetae in the ventral margin; mesotibia with two dorsal and five ventral macrosetae; metatibia with one dorsal and four ventral macrosetae. Protarsal tarsomere lengths I‒IV 0.25 0.09 mm 0.12 0.1 mm, respectively. The length of tarsomeres I, II, III and IV (in mm) on mesotarsus as follows: 0.34, 0.08, 0.12, 0.1 mm. The length of tarsomeres I, II, III and IV (in mm) on metatarsus as follows: 0.48, 0.11, 0.13, 0.12. Urotergite I with 1+1 bristle-combs composed of 3 macrosetae. Urotergites II–VI with 3+3 bristle-combs composed of 2‒5 macrosetae, urotergites VII‒VIII with 2+2 bristle-combs composed of 3‒4 macrosetae. Urotergite X trapezoidal, wider than long at its base (length 0.48 mm, base width 0.99 mm, apical width 0.29 mm), ratio length/ width about 0.48, posterior margin slightly concave (Fig. 34), with 1+1 bristle-combs of 3–4 macrosetae each. Urosternites I and II without setae, III–VIII with 1+1 lateral bristle-combs with 4–6 macrosetae. The width of the bristle combs and the space between them varying on each urosternite; this distance ranging from 10 times the width of a comb on urosternite VII to about 17 times on urosternite III. On urosternite IV (Fig. 35) this ratio about 13. Both sexes with two pairs of styli on urosternites VIII and IX. Styli IX 2.3 times longer than the inner process of the corresponding coxite in males and 2.1 times longer in females. In females, the length of styli VIII 6.2 times longer than their width, and length of styli IX about 8.7 times longer than wide. Ratio of the length of styli IX/ length of styli VIII is 1.2–1.5 for females and 1.3–1.5 for males. Inner process of female coxite VIII obliquely rounded. Length of inner process of coxite IX twice its width at its base and 4 times longer than the outer process. Ovipositor short, not surpassing the tip of coxite IX (Fig. 36). Anterior gonapophysis with 29 divisions, bearing 2–3 small setae at the apex. Posterior gonapophysis with 27 divisions. Penis as in Figures 37 and 38. Distribution and habitat. Specimens of Ctenolepisma udumalpetense sp. n. were found in large numbers generally in shady semi-decomposed dry leaf litter in forested regions. It is an active insect on the ground in leaf litter beside Trimurti Dam. The species is abundant in this tropical semi- evergreen forest of the Southern part of India. The protection of this habitat will help to conserve this Zygentoma species. Differential diagnosis. C. udumalpetense sp. n. is probably related to species of the subgenus Ctenolepisma s. str. with trapezoidal tenth urotergite, 3+3 bristle-combs in urotergites II-VI and two pairs of abdominal styli, such as Ctenolepisma (C.) ciliatum (Dufour, 1831) or C. (C). longicaudatum Escherich, 1905. Apart from these two species, some others have been described that share the aforementioned characters: C. (C.) iranicum Molero, Kahrarian & Gaju, 2016, C. (C.) armeniacum Molero-Baltanás, Gaju-Ricart, Bach de Roca & Mendes, 2010 and C. (C.) abyssinicum Mendes, 1982 from Iran, Armenia and Ethiopia, respectively. All of these species also possess on the apical article of the labial palp five strong ovoid sensory papillae arranged in a single row (Figs 22–23). They differ from C. udumalpetense sp. n., in the following characters: 1. The prosternum of C. udumalpetense sp. n. has a more rounded apex and only 1+1 pairs of bristle-combs (Fig. 28). Macrosetae of these combs are, as well as those of meso- and metasternum, arranged in a single row. However, related species have at least 2+2 bristle-combs in the prosternum (frequently, 3+3 or more); moreover, the apex of this sternite in C. ciliatum and C. abyssinicum is more acute and the combs of thoracic sternites of C. armeniacum and C. iranicum are double (consist of at least two rows of macrosetae). 2. Ctenolepisma udumalpetense sp. n. has a maximum body length of 6.1 mm, whereas similar species typically reach 8 mm or more. 3. The ovipositor of C. udumalpetense sp. n. is relatively short, not surpassing the tip of the inner process of coxites IX. In the other related species mentioned babove, the ovipositor not only surpasses the apex of coxite IX but also the tip of the styli IX. The number of divisions is also higher in these previously known species (35- 49 in C. ciliatum, even more in other species), while the new Indian species has 29 divisions. This character and the smaller size could correspond to young silverfish, but no specimens of C. udumalpetense sp. n. have been found with a greater size or a longer ovipositor. 4. The femoral scales of C. ciliatum, C. armeniacum and C. iranicum are rounded, while in C. udumalpetense sp. n. are narrower, more or less elliptical (Figs. 31–32). This character has not been described in the remaining species.

Silverfish are known as one of the major pests which feed on paper and starch-based materials and can cause serious problems in museums, libraries and archives. Ctenolepisma calvum (Ritter, 1910) was first recorded from Ceylon (now Sri Lanka) and has also been known from Central American countries including Guyana and Cuba. Recently, its rapid spread to European countries, including Austria, Czech, Germany and Norway, has been reported. In addition, there are unverified records of C. calvum from 17 more countries in the on-line citizen-science platforms iNaturalist. We report C. calvum in Japan for the first time, from Hokkaido, Miyagi, Tokyo, Fukuoka and Nagasaki Prefectures. The specimens in Japan were observed in detail by stereomicroscope, optical microscope and scanning electron microscope. The occurrence of this species is a serious problem from the viewpoint of protection of cultural properties. We also registered their mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I (COI) gene in EMBL/GenBank/DDBJ.

Smith, Graeme B., Mitchell, Andrew (2019): Species of Heterolepismatinae (Zygentoma: Lepismatidae) Found on some Remote Eastern Australian Islands. Records of the Australian Museum 71 (4): 139-181, DOI: 10.3853/j.2201-4349.71.2019.1719

Meurgey, François, Ramage, Thibault (2020): Challenging the Wallacean shortfall: A total assessment of insect diversity on Guadeloupe (French West Indies), a checklist and bibliography. Insecta Mundi 2020 (786): 1-183, DOI: http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5353608, {"references": ["Adamson, A. M. 1938. Notes on termites destructive to buildings in the Lesser Antilles. Tropical Agriculture (Trinidad) 15: 220-224.", "Aiguillon B., and B. Borthury. 2017. Les termites des iles de la Guadeloupe. Rapport d'etude. Parc National de la Guadeloupe; Saint-Claude, Guadeloupe. 162 p.", "Allemand, R., C. Lemaitre, F. Frey, M. Bouletreau, F. Vavre, G. Nordlander, J. van Alphen, and Y. Carton. 2002. Phylogeny of six African Leptoptilina species (Hymenoptera; Cynipoidea, Figitidae) parasitoids of Drosophila, with description of three new species. Annales de la Societe Entomologique de France 38: 319-332.", "Ashmead, W. H. 1900. Report upon the aculeate Hymenoptera of the islands of St Vincent and Grenada, with additions to the parasitic Hymenoptera and a list of the described Hymenoptera of the West Indies. Transactions of the Entomological Society of London 2: 207-367.", "Badonnel, A. 1981. Psocopteres geophiles des Petites Antilles. Revue d'Ecologie et de Biologie du sol 18(3): 425-434.", "Balke, M., J. Hajek, and L. Hendrich. 2017. Generic reclassification of species formerly included in Rhantus Dejean (Coleoptera, Dytiscidae, Colymbetinae). Zootaxa 4258(1): 91-100.", "Balmford, A., and K. J. Gaston. 1999. Why biodiversity surveys are good value. Nature 398: 204-205.", "Barbut, J., and B. Lalanne-Cassou. 2009. Contribution a la connaissance des Noctuidea des Antilles et descriptions de quatre nouvelles especes (Lepidoptera). Bulletin de la Societe Entomologique de France 114(4): 409-418.", "Barbut, J., and B. Lalanne-Cassou. 2010. Description d'une nouvelle especede Mythimna Ochsenheimer, 1816, sous-genre Pseudaletia Franclemont, 1951 (Lepidoptera Noctuidae Hadeninae). L'Entomologiste 66(3): 117-121.", "Barnes, M. J. C. 1993. Papillons de nuit (Lepidopteres) recoltes par M.J.C. Barnes dans le Parc National de la Guadeloupe. Rapport dactylographie. PRAG; Guadeloupe. 25 p. + pl.", "Barre, N. 1991. Arthropodes d'importance veterinaire pour les petits ruminants des Antilles et de Guyane. Revue d'Elevage et de Medecine Veterinaire des Pays Tropicaux, Numero Special: 133-138.", "Beard, J. S. 1949. The natural vegetation of the Windward and Leeward Islands. Oxford Forestry Memoirs 21: 1-192.", "Beccaloni, G. and P. Eggleton. 2013. Order Blattodea. p. 46-48. In: Z.-Q. Zhang, (ed.). Animal biodiversity: An outline of higher-level classification and survey of taxonomic richness (Addenda 2013). Zootaxa 3703: 1-82.", "Becker, V. O. 2002. The Geometroidea (Lepidoptera) from Cuba described by Herrich-Schaffer in the Gundlach collection, Havana. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 19(2): 393-417.", "Belkin, J. N. and S. J. Heinemann. 1976. Collection Records of the Project \"Mosquitoes of Middle America\". 5. French West Indies: Guadeloupe (FWI) and Martinique (FWIM, MAR). Mosquito Systematics 8(2): 163-193.", "Bennett, F. D., H. Glenn, and R. M. Baranowski. 1993. Goetheana shakespearei (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) an immigrant parasitoid of thrips in Florida and Guadeloupe. The Florida Entomologist 76(2): 395-397.", "Bensted-Smith, R. 2002. A biodiversity vision for the Galapagos Islands. Charles Darwin Foundation and World Wildlife Fund; Galapagos, Ecuador. 141 p.", "Bequaert, J. C. 1948. The Genus Pachodynerus (Hymenoptera, Vespidae) in the Antilles. Psyche 55(3): 105-112.", "Bigot, L., and J. Etienne. 2009. Les Pterophoridae de l'ile de la Guadeloupe (Lepidoptera). Bulletin de la Societe entomologique de France 114(4): 463-467.", "Bland, R. G., and L. Desutter-Grandcolas. 2003. An annotated list of Orthoptera from St Eustatius and Saba, Dutch West Indies, with descriptions of new cricket species (Trigonidiidae, Mogoplistidae). Journal of Orthoptera Research 12(2): 115-126.", "Bonfils, J. 1966. Contribution a l'etude des Orthopteroides des Antilles. II. Sur deux especes nouvelles ou peu connues (Orth. Tettigoniidae Pseudoplyllinae). Bulletin de la Societe entomologique de France 71: 77-83.", "Bonfils J. 1969. Catalogue raisonne des insectes des Antilles francaises. 2. Dictyoptera: Blattaria et Mantida. Annales de zoologie, ecologie animale 1(2): 107-120.", "Bonfils, J. 1972. Catalogue raisonne des insectes des Antilles francaises. 5. Dermaptera. Annales de zoologie, ecologie animale 4(3): 271-280.", "Bonfils, J., and A. Delplanque. 1971. Distribution des principales cicadelles des prairies aux Antilles francaises. Annales de zoologie, ecologie animale 3(2): 135-150.", "Bonfils, J., S. Quilici, and B. Reynaud. 1994. Les Hemipteres Auchenorhynques de l'Ile de la Reunion. Bulletin de la Societe entomologique de France 99(3): 227-240.", "Borkent, A. 2008. The frog-biting midges of the world (Corethrellidae: Diptera). Zootax, 1804: 1-456.", "Borkent, A. 2014. The pupae of the biting midges of the world (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae), with a generic key and analysis of the phylogenetic relationships between genera. Zootaxa 3879(1): 1-327.", "Botosaneanu, L. 1988. Trichopteres de la Martinique. Annales de la Societe Entomologique de France (Nouvelle Serie) 24: 215-228.", "Botosaneanu, L. 1989. Seconde contribution a l'etude des Trichopteres de la Martinique. Annales de la Societe entomologique de France (Nouvelle Serie) 25(1): 95-104.", "Botosaneanu, L. 1990. Results of a trichopterological (Insecta: Trichoptera) travel to the Lesser Antilles in 1989. Bulletin de l'Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique, Entomologie 60: 39-48.", "Botosaneanu, L. 1994. Les Trichopteres de la Guadeloupe. Annales de la Societe entomologique de France (Nouvelle Serie) 30(1): 33-54.", "Botosaneanu, L. 2000. Etude d'une faunule madicole de Guadeloupe: complements a la connaissance des Trichopteres (Tricoptera) de l'ile. Annales de Limnologie 36(4): 249-259.", "Botosaneanu, L. 2002. An annotated checklist of caddisflies from the Caribbean islands, with distribu- tion and bibliography (Insecta, Trichoptera). Bulletin de la Societe entomologique de France 107(1): 79-108.", "Botosaneanu, L., and J. Sykora. 1973. Sur quelques Trichopteres (Insecta: Trichoptera) de Cuba. p. 379-424. In: T. Orghidan (ed.). Resultats des Expeditions Biospeologiques cubano-roumaines a Cuba, volume 1. Editura Academiei Republicii Socialiste Romania; Bucharest. 424 p.", "Boucher, S., A. M. Dutrillaux, and B. Dutrillaux. 2015. Parthenogenetic reproduction demonstrated in the diploid Spasalus puncticollis (Le Peletier & Serville 1825), n. stat., from the Antilles (Coleoptera, Scarabaeoidea, Passalidae). Comptes Rendus Biologies 338: 738-744.", "Boykin, L. M., P. De Barro, D. G. Hall, W. B. Hunter, C. L. McKenzie, C. A. Powell, and R. G. Shetters. 2012. Overview of worldwide diversity of Diaphorina citri Kuwayama mitochondrial cytochrome oxydase 1 haplotypes: two Old World lineages and a New World invasion. Bulletin of Entomological Research 102(5): 573-582.", "Brambila, J. 2000. A Review of Cligenes with the description of a new genus, Valeris (Hemiptera: Rhyparochromidae: Antillocorini). The Florida Entomologist 83(3): 303-315.", "Branger, G. 1972. Observations sur Uthetheisa ornatrix L. en Martinique et Guadeloupe. Alexanor 7(7): 290-296.", "Brevignon, C. 2000. Description d'un nouveau Lycaenidae provenant de la foret cotiere guadeloupeenne (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae, Theclinae). Lambillionea 100(4): 625-629.", "Brevignon, C. 2001. Le genus Chlorostrymon Clench, 1961 en Guadeloupe (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae, Theclinae). Lambillionea 101(4): 561-566.", "Brevignon, C. 2003. Les papillons diurnes de la Guadeloupe (Lepidoptera, Papilionidae, Hesperioidea). Lambillionea 103(2): 1-29.", "Brevignon, C. 2004. Description de deux nouvelles sous-especes guadeloupeennes du genus Junonia Hubner, 1819 (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae, Nymphalinae). Lambillionea 104(1): 72-80.", "Brevignon, C., and L. Brevignon. 2003. Papillons de jour des Antilles francaises. PLB editions; Abymes, Guadeloupe. 64 p.", "Budesinsky, M. I., E. Valtarova, E. Semon, E. Cancello, and C. Bordereau. 2005. NMR structure determination of (11E)-trinervita-1(14),2,11 -triene, a new diterpene from sexual glands of termites. Tetrahedron 61: 10699-10704.", "Buenaventura, E., and T. Pape. 2013. Revision of the New World genus Peckia Robineau-Desvoidy (Diptera: Sarcophagidae). Zootaxa 3622 (1): 1-87.", "Capy, P., J. R. David, R. Allemand, Y. Carton, G. Febvay, and A. Kermarec. 1986. Genetic analysis of Drosophila melanogaster in the French West Indies and comparison with populations from other parts of the world. Genetica 69: 167-176.", "Cardoso, P., T. L. Erwin, P. A. V. Borges, and T. R. New. 2011. The seven impediments in invertebrate conservation and how to overcome them. Biological Conservation 144: 2647-2655.", "Carpintero, D. L. 2002. Catalogue of the Neotropical Anthocoridae (Heteroptera). Revista de la Sociedad Entomologica Argentina 61(1-2): 25-44.", "Carpintero, D. L., and P. M. Anddelape. 2012. Neotropical Scolopini (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Anthocoridae): new taxa, diagnostic characters and a key to the genera of the tribe. Acta Entomologica Musei Naturalis Pragae 52: 49-66.", "Carvalho, J. C. M. 1985. Mirideos neotropicais, CCXLIX: Especies novas da tribo Hyaliodini Carvalho Drake (Hemiptera). Revista Brasileira de Biologia 44(3): 363-376.", "Carvalho, J. C. M. 1989. Mirideos Neotropicais CCCXV: novas especies da subfamilia Bryocorinae Douglas and Scott (Hemiptera). Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias 61(1): 105-113.", "Carvalho, J. C. M., and L. A. A. Costa. 1996. The genus Fulvius from the Americas (Hemiptera: Miridae). Annales del Institudo de Biologia del Universidad Autonomia de Mexico 65(1): 63-135.", "Celini, L., V. Roy, J. H. C. Delabie, S. Caquineau, K. Questel, and P. Mora. 2013. Premiers signalements de Cyphomyrmex minutus Mayr, 1862 a Saint-Barthelemy, Petites Antilles, et au Mexique (Hymenoptera, Formicidae, Attini). Bulletin de la Societe entomologique de France 118(3): 393-398.", "Chalumeau, F. 1983. Les Coleopteres scarabaeides des Petites Antilles (Guadeloupe a Martinique). Encyclopedie Entomologique (serie 44). Editions Lechevalier; Paris. 295 p.", "Chalumeau, F., and E. Benito-Espinal. 1984. Deux Ctenuchidae (Lepidoptera) ravageurs du laurierrose aux Antilles francaises. Bulletin mensuel de la Societe linneenne de Lyon 5: 175-182.", "Chalumeau, F., and A. Delplanque. 1978. Catalogue commente des Ctenuchidae (Lepidoptera) des Antilles francaises. Bulletin de la Societe Linneenne de Lyon 47(4): 176-187.", "Chalumeau, F., and A. Delplanque. 1985. Les Insectes de la Guadeloupe et des iles avoisinantes. Centre Departemental de la Documentation Pedagogique; Pointe-a-Pitre, Guadeloupe. 45 p.", "Chalumeau, F., and J. Touroult. 2005. Les longicornes des Petites Antilles (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae): taxonomie, ethologie, biogeographie. Series Faunistica 51. Pensoft Publishers; Sofia-Moscow. 241 p.", "Chassain, J., and J. Touroult. 2014. Les Eucnemides des Antilles francaises (Coleoptera, Eucnemidae). p. 39-45. In: J. Touroult (coord.). Contribution a l'etude des Coleopteres des Petites Antilles - Tome II. Supplement au Bulletin de liaison d'ACOREP-France \" Le Coleopteriste \": 1-112.", "Claret, J., and Y. Carton. 1980. Diapause in a tropical species, Cothonaspis boulardi (Parasitic Hymenoptera). Oecologia 45: 32-34.", "Clastrier, J., and J. Legrand. 1984. Forcipomyia (Pterobosca) pinheyi nouvelle espece de l'ile Maurice parasite des ailes de libellules et nouvelles localisations du Subgenus (Diptera, Ceratopogonidae; Odonata). Revue francaise d'entomologie (N.S.) 6(4): 173-180.", "Cochereau, P. 1989. Les travaux de recherche francais en zone tropicale sur les noctuelles et pyrales du mais: synthese bibliographique. L'Agronomie tropicale 44(2): 137-142.", "Cochereau, P. 1991. Installation en Guadeloupe de Cotesia flavipes Cameron (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), un parasite larvaire foreur de la canne a sucre Diatrea saccharalis L. (Lepidoptera: Crambidae). p. 443-450. In: INRA (ed.). Rencontres Caraibes en lutte biologique, Colloques de l'INRA, 58. INRA; Paris.", "Cochereau, P., and A. Jean-Bart. 1990. Echantillonnages sur canne a sucre en Grande-Terre (Guadeloupe). Les pertes de tonnage sur pied et leurs causes. ORSTOM, INRA; Pointe a Pitre. 24 p.", "Constantin, R. 2017. Le genre Ablechrus Waterhouse en Martinique, avec la description d'une espece nouvelle (Coleoptera, Cleroidea, Malachiidae). p. 34-37. In: J. Touroult (coord.). Contribution a l'etude des Coleopteres des Petites Antilles - Tome III. Supplement au Bulletin de liaison d'ACOREP-France \" Le Coleopteriste \": 1-72.", "Corbet, P. S. 1999. Dragonflies: Behaviour and ecology of Odonata. Harley Books; Colchester. 829 p.", "Cordeiro, I. R., and F. F. Moreira. 2015. New distributional data on aquatic and semiaquatic bugs (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Gerromorpha & Nepomorpha) from South America. Biodiversity Data Journal 3: 1-30.", "Courtney, G. W., and C. L. Hogue. 2018. A review of the net-winged midges (Diptera: Blephariceridae) of the West Indies, with description of a new species from Puerto Rico. Aquatic Insects 39(2-3): 117-154.", "D'Aguilar, J. 1966. Catalogue raisonne des Insectes des Antilles francaises 1. Lepidopteres, Sphingidae. Annales des Epiphyties 1950 17: 251-262.", "Daigle, J. J. 2007. Macrothemis meurgeyi spec. nov. from Guadeloupe (Anisoptera: Libellulidae). Odonatologica 36(2): 191-195.", "Darlington, J. P. E. C. 1992. Survey of termites in Guadeloupe, Lesser Antilles (Isoptera: Kalotermitidae, Rhinotermitidae, Termitidae). The Florida Entomologist 75(1): 104-109.", "David, J. 1973. Activite nycthemerale de quelques especes de Drosophila (Diptera, Drosophilidae) de la Guadeloupe: Importance de la methode de piegeage. Annales de zoologie, ecologie animale 5: 499-506.", "Delattre, P. 1978. Conditions d'etablissement et de dispersion en Guadeloupe d' Apanteles flavipes (Hym; Braconidae), parasite des Pyrales de la Canne a sucre du genus Diatraea (Lep; Pyralidae). Entomophaga 23(1): 43-50.", "Delecolle, J. C. and J. P. Rieb. 1994. Contribution a l'etude des Ceratopogonides de la Guadeloupe. Description de trois especes nouvelles, appartenant aux genres Dasyhelea et Atrichopogon (Diptera, Nematocera). Bulletin de la Societe Entomologique de France 99: 267-279.", "Delplanque, A. 1976. Les insectes ravageurs du sorgho en Guadeloupe. Nouvelles agronomiques des Antilles et de la Guyane 2(1): 15-20.", "Delplanque, A., and F., Chalumeau. 1985. Insectes de la Guadeloupe et iles avoisinantes. CDDP de la Guadeloupe, Pointe-a-Pitre, Guadeloupe. 45 p.", "Delvare, G. 1993. Sur les Megaphragma de Guadeloupe avec la description d'une espece nouvelle (Hymenoptera, Trichogrammatidae). Revue Francaise d'Entomologie (N.S.) 15(4): 149-152.", "Descoins, C., B. Lalanne-Cassou, C. Malosse, and M. L. Milat. 1986. Analyse de la pheromone sexuelle emise par la femelle vierge de Mocis latipes (Guenee) (Noctuidae, Catocalinae) de Guadeloupe, Antilles francaises. Comptes rendus de l'Academie des Sciences de Paris 302: 509-512.", "Descoins, C., J. F. Silvain, B. Lalanne-Cassou, and H. Cheron. 1988. Surveillance d'insectes ravageurs des cultures par piegeage sexuel des males dans les departements de la Guadeloupe et de la Guyane. Agriculture, ecosystems and environment 21(1-2): 53-65.", "Dommanget, J. L. 2000. Note preliminaire sur les collections d'Odonates exotiques mises a disposition de la SFO. Martinia 16(3): 133.", "Donnelly, T. W. 1970. The Odonata of Dominica, British West Indies. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 37: 1-20.", "Dumas, L. L., and J. L. Nessimian. 2012. Faunistic catalog of the caddisflies (Insecta: Trichoptera of Parque Nacional do Itatiaia and its surroundings in South Brazil. Journal of Insect Science 12(25): 1-40.", "Dumbardon-Martial, E. 2015. Les Asilidae des Petites Antilles (Diptera). Bulletin de la Societe entomologique de France 120(4): 465-472.", "Dumbardon-Martial, E. 2016. Pollen feeding in the larva of Toxomerus pulchellus (Diptera, Syrphidae). Bulletin de la Societe Entomologique de France 121(4): 413-420.", "Dumbardon-Martial, E. 2017. Decouverte en Guadeloupe de la Dexiine Beskia aelops (Walker, 1849) (Diptera, Tachinidae, Dexiinae). Bulletin de la Societe entomologique de France 122: 357-358.", "Dumbardon-Martial, E., and S. A. Marshall. 2015. New records and behavioral observations for Grallipeza Rondani from Guadeloupe and Martinique (Diptera, Micropezidae, Taeniapterinae). Bulletin de la Societe entomologique de France 120(1): 79-82.", "Dumbardon-Martial, E., and C. Pierre. 2016. Contribution a la faune entomologique de Guadeloupe: Diptera & Cicadomorpha. Parc National de Guadeloupe; Guadeloupe. 38 p.", "Esmenjaud, D. 1984. Les noctuelles (Lepidopteres Noctuidae) des Antilles francaises. Donnees biologiques pour la conception d'une protection integree du mais contre Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) et Heliothis zea (Boddie) en Guadeloupe. Ecole Nationale Superieure Agronomique; Montpellier, France. 194 p.", "Etienne, J. 2005. Les pucerons de Guadeloupe, des Grandes et des Petites Antilles (Hemiptera, Aphididae). Bulletin de la Societe entomologique de France 110(4-5): 455-462.", "Etienne, J., D. Burckhardt, and C. Grapin. 1998. Diaphorina citri (Kuwayama) en Guadeloupe, premier signalement pour les Caraibes (Hem., Psyllidae). Bulletin de la Societe entomologique de France 103(1): 32.", "Etienne, J., and P. Champoiseau. 2011. Signalement de deux Pucerons nouveaux pour la Guadeloupe (Hemiptera, Aphididae). Bulletin de la Societe entomologique de France, 116(3): 327-328.", "Etienne, J., and E. Dumbardon-Martial. 2013. Quadrastichus erythrinae Kim: un redoutable ravageur pour les erythrines de Guadeloupe et de Martinique (Hymenoptera, Eulophidae, Tetrastichinae). Bulletin de la Societe entomologique de France 118(2): 155-158.", "Etienne, J., and R. Gagne. 2017. Les Cecidomyiidae de l'ile de la Guadeloupe et recapitulatif des especes connues des Caraibes (Diptera). Bulletin de la Societe entomologique de France 122(4): 455-466.", "Etienne, J., and M. Martinez. 2003. Les Agromyzidae de Guadeloupe: especes nouvelles et notes additionnelles (Diptera). Nouvelle revue d'Entomologie 19(3): 249-272.", "Etienne, J., M. Martinez, and G. Boecasse. 2004. Premiere signalisation averee du ravageur Melanagromyza obtusa (Malloch) dans la region neotropicale (Dipt. Agromyzidae). Bulletin de la Societe entomologique de France 109(1): 93-105.", "Etienne, J., and D. Matile-Ferrero. 2008. Crypticerya genistae (Hempel), nouveau danger en Guadeloupe (Hemiptera, Coccoidea, Monophlebidae). Bulletin de la Societe entomologique de France 113(4): 517-520.", "Etienne, J., D. Matile-Fererro, and T. Kondo. 2014. Phalacrococcus howertoni Hodges and Hodgson (Hemiptera: Coccoidea: Coccidae), a new soft scale record for the island of Guadeloupe. Revista Corpoica, Ciencia y Tecnologia Agropecuaria 15(1): 115-118.", "Etienne, J., D. Matile-Ferrero, F. Leblanc, and D. Marival. 1998. Premier signalement de la cochenille Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green) en Guadeloupe; situation actuelle de ce ravageur des cultures dans les Antilles francaises (Hemiptera; Pseudococcidae). Bulletin de la Societe entomologique de France 103(2): 159-173.", "Etienne, J., B. Michel, and C. Grapin. 2018. Premier signalement du Puceron Sarucallis kahawaluokalani (Kirkaldy, 1907) et de ses ennemis naturels en Guadeloupe (Hemiptera, Aphididae). Bulletin de la Societe entomologique de France 123(4): 447-450", "Etienne, J., S. Quilici, D. Marival, and A. Franck. 2001. Biological control of Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Psyllidae) in Guadeloupe by imported Tamarixia radiata (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae). Fruits 56(5): 307-315.", "Etienne, J., P. Ryckewaert, and B. Michel. 2015. Thrips (Insecta: Thysanoptera) of Guadeloupe and Martinique: Updated check-list with new information on their ecology and natural enemies. Florida Entomologist 98(1): 298-304.", "Etienne, J., and J. C. Streito. 2008. Premier signalement en Guadeloupe et en Martinique de Pseudacysta perseae (Heidemann, 1908), u

The long-tailed silverfish Ctenolepisma longicaudatum (Lepismatidae: Zygentoma) is a nuisance problem in buildings and a major concern in museums, libraries and archives where it cause damage to historical and priceless items. We used laboratory bioassays and two field studies of infested buildings to evaluate spatial and temporal elements of a poisoned bait strategy. In both laboratory experiments and field studies, the efficiency of poisoned bait with indoxacarb as the active ingredient was significantly improved by placing many small bait droplets evenly distributed along all edges of the treated area compared to more clustered distributions. Extended duration of bait presence and removal of competing food sources improved the control effect significantly in the laboratory bioassays. Bait-treated populations also showed a significant decline in the number of eggs deposited and emergence of new nymphs. The study supports poisoned bait as an efficient and low risk approach against the long-tailed silverfish in which extended duration of bait presence, wide distribution of bait droplets in combination with sanitation was crucial for control in the infested premises.

Heterolepisma Escherich, 1905 Heterolepisma Escherich, 1905: 63. Isolepisma Escherich, 1905: 61. Notolepisma Tillyard, 1924: 242. Type species: Lepisma pampeana Silvestri, 1902 by subsequent designation, see Paclt, 1967: 25., Published as part of Smith, Graeme B. & Mitchell, Andrew, 2019, Species of Heterolepismatinae (Zygentoma: Lepismatidae) Found on some Remote Eastern Australian Islands, pp. 139-181 in Records of the Australian Museum 71 (4) on page 143, DOI: 10.3853/j.2201-4349.71.2019.1719, http://zenodo.org/record/4653485, {"references":["Escherich, K. 1905. Das System der Lepismatiden. Zoologica (Stuttgart) 43: 1 - 164.","Tillyard, R. J. 1924. Primitive wingless insects. Part I. The silverfish, bristletails and their allies (Order Thysanura). New Zealand Journal of Science and Technology 7: 232 - 242.","Silvestri, F. 1902. Materiali per lo studio dei Tisanuri. I-V. Bollettino della Societa Entomologica Italiana 33: 204 - 249.","Paclt, J. 1967. Thysanura. Fam. Lepidotrichidae, Maindroniidae, Lepismatidae. Genera Insectorum 218 e: 1 - 86."]}

Maritisma dispar (Uchida, 1944) n. comb. Heterolepisma dispar Uchida, 1944: 185. Heterolepisma dispar, a species inhabiting coastal cliffs from the Japanese Island of Honshu, appears, from the original description and illustrations, to share many of the unusual characters such as the macrochaetae along the anterior margin of the frons, the short urotergite X, the long, spaced urosternal combs and the long parameres. The chaetotaxy of urosternite I was not mentioned but the species shares so much of the unusual morphology of H. coralinium sp. nov. that it is likely to also possess a medial comb. Both species lack a glabrous anterior margin to the frons, both have a very broad ultimate article to the labial palp, urotergite X is greatly reduced and they have unusually long urosternal combs with widely spaced macrochaetae. These characters differentiate them from the remaining species with medial combs on urosternite I. However, the illustration of Uchida suggests that the pronotal collar is complete in H. dispar. This Japanese species is here provisionally transferred to the new genus., Published as part of Smith, Graeme B. & Mitchell, Andrew, 2019, Species of Heterolepismatinae (Zygentoma: Lepismatidae) Found on some Remote Eastern Australian Islands, pp. 139-181 in Records of the Australian Museum 71 (4) on page 171, DOI: 10.3853/j.2201-4349.71.2019.1719, http://zenodo.org/record/4653485, {"references":["Uchida, H. 1944. Die Bestatigung der nicht bescriebenen Art, Heterolepisma dispar Silv. (Thysanura). Annotationes Zoologicae Japonenses 22 (4): 185 - 189."]}

Maritisma gen. nov. http://zoobank.org/NomenclaturalActs/ 56115144-6890-4115-88A2-9716C9C5EF95 Type species. Maritisma coralinium sp. nov. Diagnosis. Medium-sized silverfish. Body shape as in Fig. 169. Pigment apparently absent or very limited e.g., around eyes. Macrochaetae smooth with apical bifurcations. Scales multiradiate, rounded with ribs not very close together; lanceolate or triangular scales apparently absent.Antennae possibly with rod-like basiconic sensilla. Chaetotaxy of frons consisting of a row of macrochaetae along anterior margin joining laterally with rows along the sides of the head which run back along the margin and up over the eyes, peri-antennal groups weak. Clypeus with longer macrochaetae laterally and across the face proximally, with small setae medially. Labrum with many macrochaetae distributed across the proximal half and some smaller setae in the anterior half. Eyes of about 12 ommatidia. Apical article of labial palp broad with 3+2 papillae of the aufgelöst type (individual subunits of each papilla not packed closely together), those more distal very long. Pronotum with narrow setal collar which is largely interrupted medially. Thoracic nota with marginal setae and a few submarginal combs each of just a single or two macrochaetae; each lateral margin with two open trichobothrial areas, each anterior trichobothrial area of the pronotum with a macrochaeta laterad of the trichobothrium; posterior margin with 1+1 combs each of a single macrochaeta. Thoracic sternites free, sub-parabolic with submarginal macrochaetae along the more distal lateral regions. Legs typical for the Heterolepismatinae; tarsi with four articles, pretarsi with two claws and a medial empodial claw. Urotergites I–VII with 3+3 small combs, urotergite VIII with 2+2 combs, urotergite IX with 1+1 sublateral setulae. Urotergite X very short, rounded with a few macrochaetae along each lateral margin. Urosternite I with medial comb, urosternites II–VIII with 1+1 long combs, each macrochaeta of all combs distinctly spaced apart from adjacent macrochaetae. Coxites IX of both sexes typical for the Heterolepismatinae, with large, prominent parameres. One pair of styli only (IX). Ovipositor of female simple. Etymology. The genus name derives from the Latin word "maritimus" referring the proximity of known collection sites to the ocean combined with the suffix -isma, used for many silverfish. It is treated as grammatically neuter. Remarks. When initially examined by the first author, the specimen did not immediately appear to belong to the Heterolepismatinae, however with due consideration, most characters were generally in agreement with those associated with the Heterolepismatinae. Molecular data could not be obtained for this species due to the length of time the specimens had been in 70% ethanol. The character analysis places M. coralinium sp. nov. closest to the H. stilivarians group predominantly because both share the presence of macrochaetae rather than setae on the labrum, however the species share little else in common. The stilivarians group is currently under revision and the available molecular data places it quite distant from the remaining Australian species of Heterolepisma for which molecular data is available. The new genus can easily be distinguished from all described Heterolepismatinae (except H. dispar – see below) by the following combination of characters: the presence of chaetotaxy on the anterior margin of the frons, the absence of branched papillae on the ultimate article of the maxillary palp, the presence of 3+3 combs on urotergite I, the presence of a medial comb on urosternite I, the very long 1+1 combs of eight or more spaced macrochaetae on urosternites II–VI, the number of pairs of styli (one pair in both sexes), the wide ultimate article of the labial palp and the much shorter urotergite X., Published as part of Smith, Graeme B. & Mitchell, Andrew, 2019, Species of Heterolepismatinae (Zygentoma: Lepismatidae) Found on some Remote Eastern Australian Islands, pp. 139-181 in Records of the Australian Museum 71 (4) on pages 170-171, DOI: 10.3853/j.2201-4349.71.2019.1719, http://zenodo.org/record/4653485

Heterolepisma sclerophylla Smith, 2014 Fig. 7 Heterolepisma sclerophylla Smith, 2014: 9. Type material examined. Holotype. 1♀ (HW 1.28) (AMS K.260990, K.260991 on two slides) NSW: Broulee, 35.8578��S 150.1621��E 15 m asl, 17.xi.2010, Graeme Smith. Paratypes. 1♀ (HW 1.23) (AMS K. 377563 in ethanol) same data as holotype; 1♀ (HW 1.25) (AMS K.261218, K.261219 on two slides) same data as holotype; 1♂ (HW 1.25) (AMS K.260992, K.260993 on two slides) same data as previous; 1♂ (HW 1.23) (AMS K. 377565 in ethanol) same data as holotype; 1♂ (HW 1.13) (AMS K. 377566 in ethanol) same data as holotype; 1♀ (HW 1.15) (AMS K. 377567 in ethanol) same data as holotype; 1 juvenile ♀ (HW 0.84) (AMS K. 377568 in ethanol) same data as holotype; 1♂ (HW 1.15) (AMS K. 377569 in ethanol) same data as holotype; 1♂ (HW 1.10) (AMS K.261074, K.261075 on two slides) same data as holotype; 1♀ (HW 1.08) (AMS K. 377570 in ethanol) same data as holotype; 1♀ (HW 1.20) (AMS K. 377561 in ethanol) same locality and collector as holotype 19.xi.2010; 1♀ (HW 1.40) (AMS K. 377562 in ethanol) same data as previous. Other topotypic material examined. 1♀ (HW 1.20) (AMS K.261216, K.261217 two slides) same locality as holotype, 18.ii.2016, Graeme Smith; 1♀ (HW 1.10) (AMS K.261142 head, thorax and abdominal segments I���IV on one slide); 1♀ (HW 1.10) (AMS K.261143, K.261144 on two slides) same data as previous; 1♂ (HW 1.13) (AMS K.261145, K.261149 on two slides) same data as previous; 1♀ (HW 1.13) (AMS K.261152, K.261153 on two slides) same data as previous; 1♀ (HW 1.18) (gbs004988 in 100% ethanol) same data as previous; 1♀ (HW 1.03) (AMS K.261150, K.261151 on two slides) same data as previous. Material from other localities of the same lineage. 1♂ (HW 1.18) (AMS K.260994, K.260995 two slides) NSW: Guerilla Bay headland, 35.8321��S 150.2313��E 87 m asl, 17.xi.2010, Graeme Smith; 1♀ (HW 1.23) (AMS K.261202, K.261203 on two slides) NSW: Jibbon, 34.0781��S 151.1674��E 18 m asl, 1.i.2016, Graeme Smith; 1♀ (HW 1.00) (AMS K.261184, K.261185 on two slides) same data as previous. Comments. The Broulee group has a comparatively short ovipositor both relative to head width (1.49���1.95 HW) and in the number of divisions (32���37). Most other lineages have ovipositors in mature specimens exceeding twice the head width and with 35���41 divisions. It also seems to have lower levels of pigment overall and the density and strength of the macrochaetae on the head and notal collar is less than for other lineages (Fig. 7). The Nowra lineage has a similarly short ovipositor but appears to have much darker pigment on the labial and maxillary palps and to a lesser extent on the legs. It has denser chaetotaxy along the sides of the head near the eyes (2���4 rows wide versus 2���3 rows wide). The ovipositor length was reported in Smith (2014) as up to 2.09 times head width. This was based on the result from a specimen (originally recorded as K. 377564 in ethanol but now replaced by K. 261219 as slide) and was quite different to other specimens measured (range 1.49���1.79). This specimen was re-measured and the measurement is here corrected to 1.95 times HW. This is still much longer than other specimens from Broulee but the specimen only has 35���37 divisions which is within the normal range for the Broulee specimens (32���37). Each individual division is longer than seen with other specimens of this lineage. The lineage has been collected from three localities along the central and southern coasts of New South Wales. All localities listed have sandy soils, but this may represent a sampling bias rather than be a true indication of habitat. In the type locality it is quite common among dry Eucalypt leaves caught between the fronds of cycads (Macrozamia sp. Zamiaceae). At Guerilla Bay it was collected within abandoned termite galleries on a standing tree and at Jibbon it was collected from dry leaf litter protected from rain beneath a fallen tree or in a large hollow at the base of the tree. It was occasionally found hiding within the bark of certain spongy-barked Eucalyptus or Corymbia trees using pyrethrum sprays, where it was usually collected together with a more abundant (but not yet described) species related to Heterolepisma highlandi Smith. One Broulee specimen (K. 261145) was unusual in that one of its maxillary palps was shorter than usual and had several plumose sensilla along its length rather than the usual three, as found on the other palp where they were more evenly spaced along the article rather than in the distal half. In all specimens examined the plumose sensilla on the palps of the males are much larger (2���3 times larger diameter) and more elaborate than those on the female., Published as part of Smith, Graeme B., Mitchell, Andrew, Lee, Timothy R. C. & Espinasa, Luis, 2019, DNA Barcoding and Integrative Taxonomy of the Heterolepisma sclerophylla species complex (Zygentoma: Lepismatidae: Heterolepismatinae) and the Description of Two New Species, pp. 1-32 in Records of the Australian Museum 71 (1) on page 14, DOI: 10.3853/j.2201-4349.71.2019.1677, http://zenodo.org/record/3837977, {"references":["Smith, G. B. 2014. Two new species of Heterolepisma (Zygentoma: Lepismatidae) from eastern New South Wales. General and Applied Entomology: The Journal of the Entomological Society of New South Wales 42 (2013): 7 - 22 (published 2014)."]}

Heterolepisma coorongooba sp. nov. Figs 6, 8���36 Holotype. ♀ (HW 1.30) (AMS K.261208, K.261209 on two slides) NSW: Glen Davis, above Coorongooba campground, 33.1271��S 150.3232��E 313m asl, 20.vi.2015, Graeme Smith. Paratypes. 2♀♀, 1♂, 1 juvenile, all same data as holotype including 1♀ (HW 1.15) (AMS K.261210, K.261211 on two slides); 1♀ (HW 1.11) (AMS K.261212, K.261213 on two slides); 1♂ (HW 1.08) (AMS K.261204, K.261205 on two slides); 1 juvenile (HW 0 3) (AMS K. 377726 in ethanol). Diagnosis. This species is very similar to Heterolepisma sclerophylla differing in having one fewer pairs of styli in both the male and female (i.e. IX only in ♂, VIII and IX in the ♀). Compared to the lineage from the type locality it also has a longer ovipositor and thicker and perhaps more densely packed chaetotaxy along the pronotal collar and margins of the head. Description Appearance: Medium to large silverfish, scale covering in life uniform or slightly mottled grey with brown antennae, terminal filaments brown with lighter annuli around larger macrochaetae resulting in distinctly banded appearance (Fig. 6). Body length: H+B up to 9.1 mm (♀) 7.0 mm (♂); maximum HW 1.30 mm; thorax: length up to 2.5 mm (or 0.27���0.36 H+B); width up to 2.05 mm, usually slightly widest at the mesonotum; antennae damaged in all specimens, maximum preserved length of antenna 4.4 mm (or 0.56 H+B); terminal filaments damaged in all specimens, maximum preserved length of cercus 2.8 mm (or 0.31 H+B); maximum preserved length of median dorsal appendage 3.4 mm (or 0.42 H+B). Body neither elongate nor broad with thorax slightly wider than abdominal segment I, the following abdominal segments about the same width until the fourth or fifth after which the abdomen tapers posteriorly. Pigmentation: Pigment brown in alcohol preserved specimens. Present around eyes and to a lesser extent behind the peri-antennal group of macrochaetae; pedicel and scape very lightly pigmented distally, rest of flagellum uniformly lightly pigmented; all articles of maxillary palp with pigment especially in the four most distal articles although much less in the ultimate article; labium with pigment on the three most distal articles, being strongest on the penultimate, especially distally. Pigment present in anterior corner and along margins of all nota. Legs not heavily pigmented, with light pigment along outer margin of the coxa and the trochanter, apically on the outer femur and strongest on the tibia especially on the dorsal surface, present on basal article of tarsi, urotergite X and coxites IX with light pigmentation; styli IX pigmented in distal three quarters; other styli with less pigment. Ovipositor with yellowish hue. Terminal filaments with rings of pigment, with the pigment present in all annuli except the annuli bearing the large macrochaetae. Pigmentation is much reduced in juvenile specimens. Macrochaetae: Bifid apically, or simple, light to darker brown in colour. Often quite thick e.g., the stronger macrochaetae of the pronotal collar measured about 50 microns in diameter in the holotype (HW 1.30) compared to 38 microns in the similar-sized holotype of H. sclerophylla (HW 1.28) from Broulee (compare Figs 7, 8). They also appear to be more densely packed. Scales: Unevenly rounded or ovoid, with numerous parallel ribs that do not extend beyond the margin (Fig. 9); in alcohol dorsal scales with dark brown ribs; ventrally mostly hyaline. Lanceolate scales not observed. Scales absent from flagellum of antennae, mouthparts and terminal filaments. Head: Wider than long (Fig. 10) with marginal rows about three macrochaetae wide along the sides of the vertex decreasing to two wide in front of the antennae and six strong curved macrochaetae along the anterior margin, the lateral rows extend back above the eyes, as well as a small 1+1 peri-antennal groups not quite isolated from the marginal rows at the level of each antenna. Clypeus with numerous setae, some long and thin, others more robust arranged in 1+1 lines in the proximal lateral regions but not forming combs. Labrum with thin setae only. Eyes dark, composed of about 12 ommatidia.���Antennal scape with a subdistal rosette of setae, very conspicuous from above (Fig. 11), and numerous setae along the sides and over the ventral face; pedicel short, 0.51 times the length of the scape (range 0.47���0.55), with many setae mostly distally and on the ventral face; repeating intervals of distal end of antennae (Fig. 12) of eight annuli, the most apical annulus of each interval (T-annulus) with a trichobothrium and at least one small inconspicuous rod-like basiconic sensillum (type B of Adel, 1984), the second and forth annuli also each with a sausage-shaped type C sensillum (confirmed also to be present on same annuli in holotype of H. sclerophylla).���Mandibles typical for genus with welldeveloped molar and incisor areas; a group of about nine strong setae distally adjacent to the pectinate molar area and a bush of 50+ setae and macrochaetae externally.���Maxilla (Fig. 13) with three large macrochaetae externally proximal to the palp, the lacinia with three strong teeth, one shorter than the rest, seven lamellate processes and a row of eight simple setae, the galea longer than the lacinia with setulae on the outer face. Palp with rosettes of distinctly stronger setae (some ���carrot-shaped���) subapically on the three basal articles, all articles with numerous fine setae, apical article of maxillary palp 4.6 times longer than wide (range 4.1���4.9) and 1.23 times longer than penultimate article (range 1.16���1.27), the ultimate article in both sexes with three ���branched��� papillae, those in the female less robust than those in the male.���Labium (Fig. 14) short and broad with rows of strong setae on the prementum and submentum; glossae and paraglossae quite broad with short curved setulae; labial palp short, apical article eccentric suboval, 1.1 times as long as wide (range L/W 0.8���1.3) with 2+3 papillae of compact type in a ���cluster formation��� where the slightly larger distal papillae curve around the two smaller proximal papillae and a curved club-like thin-walled basiconic sensillum and at least one rod-like basiconic sensillum, which can also be confirmed as present on the holotype of H. sclerophylla. Thorax: Pronotum (Fig. 15) with strong setal collar of short, apically bifurcated setae and cilia with a row of longer macrochaetae spaced along the back of the collar including 1+1 long thin simple setae about one third in from each side, the density and length of the smaller more marginal macrochaetae of the collar decreases only slightly towards the middle but not the size and density of the larger spaced macrochaetae in the posterior row; lateral margins also with numerous shorter but quite robust, apically bifurcate setae as well as several larger more erect submarginal macrochaetae; trichobothrial areas open and in contact with the lateral margins, the anterior one (Fig. 16) located just anterior to the mid-point along the margin, with or without a large submarginal macrochaeta, when present laterad to the trichobothrium (this macrochaeta missing on the left side of the holotype) and with a cilium and a few setulae; posterior trichobothrial area (Fig. 17) near posterior lateral corner with two submarginal macrochaetae between the trichobothrium and the margin as well as a few setae and setulae; posterior margin slightly concave with 1+1 combs (Fig. 18) each of two macrochaetae, the more postero-mediad lying flatter than the other, each comb associated with a setula and a few cilia.���Mesonotum with lateral chaetotaxy similar to pronotum but less dense (Fig. 19), except the submarginal macrochaetae anterior to the trichobothrial areas are grouped into combs of two, each associated with a cilium and a few setulae, the more posterior of these on the left side of the holotype of only one macrochaeta, both trichobothrial areas (Fig. 20) of similar configuration to those of pronotum except anterior area has a macrochaeta mediad of the trichobothrium. The posterior combs of the mesonotum are unusual in that they both consist of only a single macrochaeta in the illustrated holotype (Fig. 21) whereas in the paratype K. 261204 one consists of two macrochaetae and the other of only one and in the other paratypes (K. 261213 and K. 261210) two macrochaetae are present on both sides.���Metanotum (Figs 22, 23) similar to mesonotum; both posterior combs consist of two equal sized insertion points. The trichobothrium appears to be absent from the right posterior area of the holotype. a Small infralateral setae b More posterior seta insertion smaller Presternum narrow, with transverse row of strong setae and numerous cilia and setulae (Fig. 24).���All thoracic sterna and coxae with hyaline scales. Prothoracic sternum pointed cordiform, almost as long as wide at its base (range L/W 0.91���1.00) and reaching to about two thirds the length of the coxa, rounded apically and with a medial furrow (Fig. 24), most of lateral margins with numerous small marginal setae and cilia, with 6���7 larger submarginal macrochaetae forming weak combs parallel to the edges in the distal third.���Mesosternum (Fig. 25) 1.08 times longer than broad (range 1.01���1.12) with an acutely rounded apex, with setae and cilia along the distal quarter of the margins, with 1+1 distal combs of four apically bifurcate macrochaetae and 1+1 subposterior more pointed macrochaetae.���Metasternum (Fig. 26) 0.79 times longer than wide (range 0.77���0.80) with less pointed, even slightly concave, apex, each comb of four macrochaetae. Legs fairly long (Figs 24, 26), tibia L/W ratio of legs PI 3.0 (range 2.9���3.2), PII 3.4 (range 2.8���4.0), PIII 3.9 (range 3.5���4.2); tarsi L/W ratio PI 7.0 (range 6.3���8.0), PII 7.0 (range 6.3���7.7), PIII 8.5 (range 7.4���9.7). Legs increasingly longer from front to back, mean ratio PI/PIII (tibia 0.62, tarsus 0.72). PI with transverse comb of about six macrochaetae laterally on the precoxa. Coxa of all legs covered with hyaline scales and with strong macrochaetae and numerous cilia and setulae in a row about two macrochaetae wide along the external margin, a strong seta on the inner margin subapically and group of about six curved setae at the apex over the articulation. Trochanter lacking scales, with fine and one stronger seta over the surface. Femur with numerous setae over most of the surface and along the margin; anterior distal end with two strong, quite deeply bifurcate stout macrochaetae and another simple stout macrochaeta more proximal; posterior margin with several strong macrochaetae as illustrated. Tibia with numerous long setae over the ventral surface, with three stout macrochaetae on or near the anterior margin and six or seven stout macrochaetae along the posterior margin; apical spur with several setae. Tibia of PIII with a long thin, laterally projecting trichobothria-like seta inserted dorsal to the proximal stout macrochaeta on the anterior margin, which is about two times as long as the tibia is wide. Tarsus with four articles, all with numerous setae, some on the ventral surface quite long and strong. Pretarsus with long curved lateral claws and a strong curved shorter medial claw. Abdomen: Urotergite I usually with 2+2 combs each of one to three macrochaetae (usually two) located quite close together, urotergites II-VII with 3+3 combs of macrochaetae as in Table 7 (Figs 9, 27���29) noting that the more posteromedial insertion point of each submedial comb was occasionally, quite a bit smaller than the other insertion point, but mostly of about the same size; each comb also associated with up to five marginal setae, five setulae and four cilia. Urotergite VIII with 2+2 combs, lacking the sublateral comb; urotergite IX (Fig. 30) with two infralateral setae on each side as well as a setula and a few cilia. Urotergite X short, parabolic in both sexes (Fig. 31), L/W at base about 0.52 (range 0.51���0.55) with many strong setae along entire margin and obscure 1+1 submarginal macrochaetae in the posterolateral corners. Urosternite I glabrous, urosternites II���VIII (Fig. 32) with 1+1 single macrochaetae (Fig. 33), each associated with 0���2 small marginal setae as well as a few cilia and/or setulae. Coxites of segment VIII in ♀ (Fig. 34) with one or two small macrochaetae, one or two small marginal setae and a cilium mediad of the stylus base and some small setae, setulae and a cilium laterad of the stylus base. Styli in two pairs in the ♀ (VIII���IX); all styli with several noticeably longer and stronger setae apically (Fig. 34) as well as stronger setae along the middle of the ventral face. Styli IX 2.4 times as long as styli VIII (range 2.2���2.8). Coxite IX of ♀ (Fig. 34), the internal process acute apically, about three times longer than the external process (range 2.9���3.2) and 1.5 times as long as broad at its base (range 1.5���1.6), not reaching to half the length of the stylus; external and internal margins of internal process and external margin and apex of outer process with many moderately strong setae directed both up and down.���Ovipositor (Fig. 34), very long and thin (up to 2.34 HW), surpassing the apex of stylus IX by more than the length of the stylus (excluding terminal macrochaetae), composed of 34���39 divisions. Distal divisions of gonapophyses VIII and IX with only short fine setae and setulae. Cerci not well preserved in slide material, with basal divisions shorter than long, gradually becoming longer distally, equally wide as long by about the eighth division after which they become even longer with more annuli each with a rosette of setae and some with trichobothria with the large macrochaetae restricted to the most distal annulus of each division; the most distal surviving divisions with up to four annuli, this annulus without pigment.���Medial filament of similar arrangement. Male: As for female except only one pair of styli (segment IX). Coxites IX (Fig. 35) with acute inner process about 1.3 times longer than wide at its base and about three times longer than the external process, reaching to just under half the length of the stylus. Both process also with several strong setae mostly apically emerging from both the dorsal and ventral surfaces of the processes close to or on the margin. Parameres a little longer than wide, with about thirty fine setae (Fig. 36). Penis typical for genus with numerous glandular setae apically, each set on a protuberance. Subadult stages: the single juvenile specimen available, K.377726 (HW 0.63) had a single pair of styli (IX) and no indication of urosternite VIII dividing into separate coxites nor any nascent genitalia (ovipositor or parameres). The thoracic sternites conformed to those of the adults and the long thin setae on the tibia of PIII was present and very long (about three times the width of the tibia), tergite X was round but shorter than in the adults and the feathered papilla of the maxillary palp could not be seen. Habitat. Heterolepisma coorongooba was collected from leaf litter protected from rain under a fallen but still elevated, log. Etymology. The species name is derived from the proper noun Coorongooba referring the creek that flows through the valley from where it was collected. Comments. The morphology of this species is very close to that of H. sclerophylla, differing from it only in the absence of the most anterior pair of styli in both sexes. It differs from the Broulee lineage in the length of the ovipositor (2.17���2.34 times HW versus 1.49���1.95), but not so much in the number of divisions (34���39 versus 32���37) and the more robust macrochaetae. The Megalong, North Nowra and Glenbrook lineages also have more robust macrochaetae and a longer ovipositor (but more divisions) leaving the fewer styli as the only unambiguous defining character., Published as part of Smith, Graeme B., Mitchell, Andrew, Lee, Timothy R. C. & Espinasa, Luis, 2019, DNA Barcoding and Integrative Taxonomy of the Heterolepisma sclerophylla species complex (Zygentoma: Lepismatidae: Heterolepismatinae) and the Description of Two New Species, pp. 1-32 in Records of the Australian Museum 71 (1) on pages 16-22, DOI: 10.3853/j.2201-4349.71.2019.1677, http://zenodo.org/record/3837977, {"references":["Adel, T. 1984. Sensilleninventar und sensillenmuster auf den Antennen von Thermobia domestica und Lepisma saccharina (Insecta: Zygentoma). Braunschweiger Naturkundliche Schriften 2: 191 - 217."]}

Smith, Graeme B., Mitchell, Andrew, Lee, Timothy R. C., Espinasa, Luis (2019): DNA Barcoding and Integrative Taxonomy of the Heterolepisma sclerophylla species complex (Zygentoma: Lepismatidae: Heterolepismatinae) and the Description of Two New Species. Records of the Australian Museum 71 (1): 1-32, DOI: 10.3853/j.2201-4349.71.2019.1677

Heterolepisma Escherich, 1905 Heterolepisma Escherich, 1905: 63. Type species: Lepisma pampeana Silvestri, 1902 by subsequent designation (Paclt, 1967: 25). Isolepisma Escherich, 1905: 61. Notolepisma Tillyard, 1924: 241., Published as part of Smith, Graeme B., Mitchell, Andrew, Lee, Timothy R. C. & Espinasa, Luis, 2019, DNA Barcoding and Integrative Taxonomy of the Heterolepisma sclerophylla species complex (Zygentoma: Lepismatidae: Heterolepismatinae) and the Description of Two New Species, pp. 1-32 in Records of the Australian Museum 71 (1) on page 14, DOI: 10.3853/j.2201-4349.71.2019.1677, http://zenodo.org/record/3837977, {"references":["Escherich, K. 1905. Das System der Lepismatiden. Zoologica (Stuttgart) 43 (18): 1 - 164.","Paclt, J. 1967. Thysanura. Fam. Lepidotrichidae, Maindroniidae, Lepismatidae. Genera Insectorum 218 e: 1 - 86.","Tillyard, R. J. 1924. Primitive wingless insects. Part I. The silverfish, bristletails and their allies (Order Thysanura). New Zealand Journal of Science and Technology 7: 232 - 242."]}

Heterolepisma highlandi Smith 2014 Heterolepisma highlandi Smith, 2014: 16. Type material (paratype). 1 juvenile ♀ (HW 0.88) (AMS K. 377604 in ethanol) NSW: Wee Jasper, 35.0591��S 148.6489��E 552 m asl, 21.viii.2010, Graeme Smith and Phil Fleming., Published as part of Smith, Graeme B., Mitchell, Andrew, Lee, Timothy R. C. & Espinasa, Luis, 2019, DNA Barcoding and Integrative Taxonomy of the Heterolepisma sclerophylla species complex (Zygentoma: Lepismatidae: Heterolepismatinae) and the Description of Two New Species, pp. 1-32 in Records of the Australian Museum 71 (1) on page 14, DOI: 10.3853/j.2201-4349.71.2019.1677, http://zenodo.org/record/3837977, {"references":["Smith, G. B. 2014. Two new species of Heterolepisma (Zygentoma: Lepismatidae) from eastern New South Wales. General and Applied Entomology: The Journal of the Entomological Society of New South Wales 42 (2013): 7 - 22 (published 2014)."]}

Heterolepisma buntonorum Smith 2016 Heterolepisma buntonorum Smith 2016a: 58. Material examined. 1♀ (HW 1.43) (AMS K.261244 K.261245 on two slides) TAS: Knocklofty, 42.8752��S 147.2957��E 270 m asl, 13.ii.2016, Stephen Bunton., Published as part of Smith, Graeme B., Mitchell, Andrew, Lee, Timothy R. C. & Espinasa, Luis, 2019, DNA Barcoding and Integrative Taxonomy of the Heterolepisma sclerophylla species complex (Zygentoma: Lepismatidae: Heterolepismatinae) and the Description of Two New Species, pp. 1-32 in Records of the Australian Museum 71 (1) on page 14, DOI: 10.3853/j.2201-4349.71.2019.1677, http://zenodo.org/record/3837977, {"references":["Smith, G. B. 2016 a. On some silverfish taxa from Tasmania (Zygentoma: Lepismatidae and Nicoletiidae). Records of the Australian Museum 68 (2): 45 - 80. https: // doi. org / 10.3853 / j. 2201 - 4349.68.2016.1652"]}

Genus CTENOLEPISMA Ctenolepisma lineata (Fabricius, 1775) four lined silverfish, Four-lined Silverfish (Notton, 2018) Baltanas et al. (2012) classified the species C.lineata abandoning the obsolete variety Ctenolepisma lineata var pilifera. The species has an approximate size of up to 13.5mm (Baltanas et al, 2012) characteristic 4 longitudunial strips (Notton, 2018) pigmentation may be faint in synathropic specimens (Baltanas et al, 2012). Notton (2018) remarks that this species has previously been found in the UK. Baltanas et al (2013) states that C.lineata is wipespread in Central Europe and is facultative synanthropic. Ctenolepisma longicaudata (Escherich 1905) Giant Silverfish, grey Silver fish (Notton, 2018) Length up to 20mm, cosmopolitan, established in the UK 2014 (Notton, 2018), first reported by Goddard et al (2016) distribution is expanding rapidly (Notton, 2018) C.longicaudata, has a carrot shaped, tapered and flattened body like the other members of the family, it is uniformly silver grey scalled with obvious bristles at the sides of the body with long and slender tail filaments and antennae. Is believed to have become established in the UK in 2014 (Notton, 2018), but was first reported by Goddard et al. (2016). Its distribution in the UK is expanding rapidly (Notton, 2018). This species can tolerate a lower range of humidities than and thus has the potential to outrange L. saccharina (Notton, 2018), Published as part of Chick, Andrew I. R., 2018, A Revised Checklist of the UK Silverfish (Zygentoma: Lepismatidae), pp. 447-450 in Zootaxa 4504 (3) on page 449, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4504.3.10, http://zenodo.org/record/2606432, {"references":["Notton, D. G. (2018) Identifying insect pests in museums and heritage buildings, 2 nd Edition. The Natural History Museum, London, 64 pp.","Baltanas, R. F., Ricart, M. G. & Bach de Roca, C. (2013) New data for a revision of the genus Ctenolepisma (Zygentoma: Lepismatidae): rediscription of Ctenolepisma lineata and new status for Ctenolepisma nicoletii. Annales de la Societe Entomologique de France, 48, (1 - 2), 66 - 80.","Goddard, M. R., Foster, C. W. & Holloway, G. J. (2016) Ctenolepisma longicaudata (Zygentoma: Lepismatidae) new to Britain. The British Journal of Entomology and Natural History, 29, 33 - 36."]}

Ctenolepisma guanche Mendes, 1993 Garcia de Orta. Série de Zoologia, 18 (1/2): 87 Holotype. Canary Islands. La Gomera, La Caldera: 1♂ 01.III.1990 W.L. Hansen & A. Pedersen leg., on slide (NHMD 228961). Paratype. Canary Islands. La Gomera, La Caldera: 1♀ 01.III.1990 W.L. Hansen & A. Pedersen leg., on slide (NHMD 228962). Current status: Valid name. Ctenolepisma latisternata Mendes, 1992 Garcia de Orta. Série de Zoologia, 19 (1/2): 98 Holotype. Congo. Loango: 1♀ 14.III.1906 (no collector on label), on slide (NHMD 228963). Current status: Valid name., Published as part of Eusébio, Rita, Sendra, Alberto, Enghoff, Henrik & Reboleira, Ana Sofia P. S., 2018, Catalogue of the type material in the entomological collection of the Natural History Museum of Denmark: basal hexapods, pp. 201-236 in Zootaxa 4457 (2) on pages 231-232, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4457.2.1, http://zenodo.org/record/1341991, {"references":["Mendes, L. F. (1992) Novos dados sobre os tisanuros (Microcoryphia e Zygentoma) da America do Norte. Garcia de Orta. Serie de Zoologia, 16 (1 / 2), 171 - 193."]}

Neoasterolepisma soerenseni (Silvestri, 1908) Bollettino del Laboratorio di zoologia generale e agraria della R. Scuola superiore d'agricoltura in Portic i, 2: 364 Holotype. Mauritania: 1♂ (no date available on the label) Sörensen leg., on slide (NHMD 205883). Current status: Valid name. Original combination: Lepisma soerenseni. Transferred to Neoasterolepisma by Mendes (1988)., Published as part of Eusébio, Rita, Sendra, Alberto, Enghoff, Henrik & Reboleira, Ana Sofia P. S., 2018, Catalogue of the type material in the entomological collection of the Natural History Museum of Denmark: basal hexapods, pp. 201-236 in Zootaxa 4457 (2) on page 232, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4457.2.1, http://zenodo.org/record/1341991, {"references":["Silvestri, F. (1908) Materiali per lo studio dei Tisanuri VIII-XI. Bollettino del Laboratorio di zoologia generale e agraria della R. Scuola superiore d'agricoltura in Portici, 2, 359 - 396.","Mendes, L. F. (1988) Revisao do genero Lepisma Lin., 1758 s. lat. (Zygentoma, Lepismatidae). Boletim da Sociedade Portuguesa de Entomologia, 2, 1 - 236."]}

Eusébio, Rita, Sendra, Alberto, Enghoff, Henrik, Reboleira, Ana Sofia P.S. (2018): Catalogue of the type material in the entomological collection of the Natural History Museum of Denmark: basal hexapods. Zootaxa 4457 (2): 201-236, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4457.2.1

Ctenolepisma tanzanica Mendes, 1982 Revue de Zoologie Africane, 96 (3): 618 Holotype. Tanzania. East Usambara Mountains, Amani: 1♂ 26/I/1977 H. Enghoff leg., on slide (NHMD 205889). Current status: Valid name., Published as part of Eusébio, Rita, Sendra, Alberto, Enghoff, Henrik & Reboleira, Ana Sofia P. S., 2018, Catalogue of the type material in the entomological collection of the Natural History Museum of Denmark: basal hexapods, pp. 201-236 in Zootaxa 4457 (2) on page 232, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4457.2.1, http://zenodo.org/record/1341991

Prolepismina tuxeni Mendes, 1982 Entomologica Scandinavica, 13: 97 Holotype. United States of America. San Bernardino County, California: 1♂ 8/IV/1966 E.B. Larsen leg., on slide (NHMD 205956). Paratype. United States of America. San Bernardino County, California: 1♀ 8/IV/1966 E.B. Larsen leg., on slide (NHMD 205958). Current status: Valid name., Published as part of Eusébio, Rita, Sendra, Alberto, Enghoff, Henrik & Reboleira, Ana Sofia P. S., 2018, Catalogue of the type material in the entomological collection of the Natural History Museum of Denmark: basal hexapods, pp. 201-236 in Zootaxa 4457 (2) on page 232, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4457.2.1, http://zenodo.org/record/1341991

Desertinoma palaearctica (Wygodzinsky, 1950) Videnskabelige Meddelelser fra Dansk naturhistorisk Forening i KjØbenhavn, 112: 141 Holotype. Afganistan. Pirzadar: 1♂ 18/V/1949 N. Haarløv leg., on slide (NHMD 205940). Paratype. Afganistan. Pirzadar: 1♀ 4/VI/1948 N. Haarløv leg., on slide (NHMD 205942). Current status: Valid name. Original combination: Bakerella palaearctica. Transferred to Desertinoma by Kaplin (1992)., Published as part of Eusébio, Rita, Sendra, Alberto, Enghoff, Henrik & Reboleira, Ana Sofia P. S., 2018, Catalogue of the type material in the entomological collection of the Natural History Museum of Denmark: basal hexapods, pp. 201-236 in Zootaxa 4457 (2) on page 232, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4457.2.1, http://zenodo.org/record/1341991, {"references":["Wygodzinsky, P. W. (1950) The 3 rd Danish Expedition to Central Asia. Zoological Results 2. Thysanura (Insecta) aus Afghanistan. Videnskabelige Meddelelser fra Dansk naturhistorisk Forening i KjObenhavn, 112, 139 - 155.","Kaplin, V. G. (1992) The bristletails Desertinoma gen. n. (Thysanura: Lepismatidae) of the world fauna. Izvestiya Akademii Nauk Turkmenskoi SSR Seriya Biologicheskikh Nauk, 3, 22 - 29."]}

Acrotelsa collaris (Fabricius, 1793) Entomologia systematica emendata et aucta, 2: 64 Syntypes. West Indies (as “Ins. Amer.”): 2ex. (no date on label) Dr. Pflug leg., dry on pins (NHMD 62177, NHMD 62178). Current status: Valid name. Original combination: Lepisma collaris. Transferred to Acrotelsa by Escherich (1905). Additional notes: Specimen NHMD 62177 has two original labels: “Ex Ins. Amer.” and “Mus. S. & T.L.”, which mean “from Insulae Americae” and “Collection Sehestedt & Tønder Lund”. This specimen corresponds to the “ type?” referred to by Zimsen (1964: 623). Specimen NHMD 62178 has one original label: “Mus. S. & T.L.”., Published as part of Eusébio, Rita, Sendra, Alberto, Enghoff, Henrik & Reboleira, Ana Sofia P. S., 2018, Catalogue of the type material in the entomological collection of the Natural History Museum of Denmark: basal hexapods, pp. 201-236 in Zootaxa 4457 (2) on page 231, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4457.2.1, http://zenodo.org/record/1341991, {"references":["Fabricius, J. (1793) Entomologia systematica emandata et aucta. Secundum classes, ordines, genera, species adjectis synonimis, locis, observationibus descriptionibus. Vol. II. Impensis Christ. Gottl. Proft, Hafniae, 349 pp. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 125869","Escherich, K. (1905) Das System der Lepismatiden. Zoologica, Stuttgart, 43, 1 - 164.","Zimsen, E. (1964) The type material of I. C. Fabricius. Vol. 11. Munksgaard, Copenhagen, 656 pp."]}

A survey of wingless insects belonging to the orders Microcoryphia (=Archaeognatha) and Zygentoma (=Thysanura s. str.) has been performed in subterranean habitats of central Iran. As a result, several new species have been discovered. In this work, three new species are described: a new species of bristletail of the family Machilidae,Haslundiellairanicasp. n., a new silverfish of the family Lepismatidae,Ctenolepismasubterraneumsp. n., and a new Nicoletiidae, Lepidospora (Brinckina) momtazianasp. n.These new taxa are compared with related species in their respective genera and keys for their identification are provided: one for all known species ofHaslundiellaand one for all basal insects of subterranean environments of Iran which includes those previously reported. Moreover, the previously published keys of IranianCtenolepismaand the subgenus Brinckina are modified to include the new species. Three additional species of Lepismatidae are reported in this work:Neoasterolepìsma palmoniiandCtenolepismatargioniiare newly recorded from Iran and both species, together withAcrotelsacollaris, are cited for the first time in the subterranean habitats. This survey progresses the knowledge on the biodiversity of these insects in Iran.

Smith, Graeme B. (2015): New Silverfish Taxa from Queensland (Zygentoma: Lepismatidae). Records of the Australian Museum 67 (3): 67-81, DOI: 10.3853/j.2201-4349.67.2015.1641, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3853/j.2201-4349.67.2015.1641

3.139 Genus Cretalepisma Mendes & Wunderlich, 2013 Cretalepisma Mendes & Wunderlich, 2013: 17. Type species: Cretalepisma kachinicum Mendes & Wunderlich, 2013., Published as part of Guo, Mingxia, Xing, Lida, Wang, Bo, Zhang, Weiwei, Wang, Shuo, Shi, Aimin & Bai, Ming, 2017, A catalogue of Burmite inclusions, pp. 249-379 in Zoological Systematics 42 (3) on page 283, DOI: 10.11865/zs.201715, http://zenodo.org/record/5360313

Guo, Mingxia, Xing, Lida, Wang, Bo, Zhang, Weiwei, Wang, Shuo, Shi, Aimin, Bai, Ming (2017): A catalogue of Burmite inclusions. Zoological Systematics 42 (3): 249-379, DOI: 10.11865/zs.201715

3.140 Genus Burmalepisma Mendes & Poinar, 2008 Burmalepisma Mendes & Poinar, 2008: 492. Type species: Burmalepisma cretacicum Mendes & Poinar, 2008., Published as part of Guo, Mingxia, Xing, Lida, Wang, Bo, Zhang, Weiwei, Wang, Shuo, Shi, Aimin & Bai, Ming, 2017, A catalogue of Burmite inclusions, pp. 249-379 in Zoological Systematics 42 (3) on page 283, DOI: 10.11865/zs.201715, http://zenodo.org/record/5360313, {"references":["Mendes, L. F., Poinar, G. O. 2008. A new fossil silverfish (Zygentoma: Insecta) in Mesozoic Burmese amber. European Journal of Soil Biology, 44: 491 - 494."]}

194) Cretalepisma kachinicum Mendes & Wunderlich, 2013 Cretalepisma kachinicum Mendes & Wunderlich, 2013: 18. Type specimen(s). H (♀): F2329/BU/CJW (SMF)., Published as part of Guo, Mingxia, Xing, Lida, Wang, Bo, Zhang, Weiwei, Wang, Shuo, Shi, Aimin & Bai, Ming, 2017, A catalogue of Burmite inclusions, pp. 249-379 in Zoological Systematics 42 (3) on page 283, DOI: 10.11865/zs.201715, http://zenodo.org/record/5360313

195) Burmalepisma cretacicum Mendes & Poinar, 2008 Burmalepisma cretacicum Mendes & Poinar, 2008: 493. Type specimen(s). H (♀): B-TH 1 (PACO). P (?): B-TH 1A (PACO)., Published as part of Guo, Mingxia, Xing, Lida, Wang, Bo, Zhang, Weiwei, Wang, Shuo, Shi, Aimin & Bai, Ming, 2017, A catalogue of Burmite inclusions, pp. 249-379 in Zoological Systematics 42 (3) on page 283, DOI: 10.11865/zs.201715, http://zenodo.org/record/5360313, {"references":["Mendes, L. F., Poinar, G. O. 2008. A new fossil silverfish (Zygentoma: Insecta) in Mesozoic Burmese amber. European Journal of Soil Biology, 44: 491 - 494."]}

3.138 Genus Allacrotelsa Silvestri, 1935 Allacrotelsa Silvestri, 1935: 307. Type species: Acrotelsa spinata Packard, 1873., Published as part of Guo, Mingxia, Xing, Lida, Wang, Bo, Zhang, Weiwei, Wang, Shuo, Shi, Aimin & Bai, Ming, 2017, A catalogue of Burmite inclusions, pp. 249-379 in Zoological Systematics 42 (3) on page 283, DOI: 10.11865/zs.201715, http://zenodo.org/record/5360313

Ctenolepisma (Sceletolepisma) kermanshanum Molero, Kahrarian & Gaju, new species Figs. 21���30 Type material. Holotype: one male from Bistoon Mountain, under rocks, (N 34 �� 23 ��� E 47 �� 26 ���,elev. 1116 m), Harsin County, Kermanshah, Iran, June, 2013, mounted on a slide, deposited in MNCN, Cat. Types N. 2607. Paratype: one male from the same sample, deposited in UCO (Ref. Z 2503). Description. Body length 5.5 mm in the holotype, 5.1 mm in the paratype. Body subcylindrical; thorax very slightly wider than the abdomen base, width 1.5 mm). Epidermic pigment light brownish in specimens preserved in alcohol, more intense in appendages. Macrosetae hyaline or light yellowish to brown. Dorsal scales with dark pigment. Some scales of the lateral parts of nota are larger than the others, and some show an indentation corresponding with bare spots. Eyes and setation of the head typical of the genus. Antennae broken (maximum length preserved 2.4 mm). Maxillary palp with long articles, the distal article 4.5���5 times longer than wide and as long as the penultimate segment (Fig. 21). Apical article of the labial palp 1.1 times longer than wide, with three sensory papillae arranged in a single row (Fig. 22). A group of basiconic sensilla are visible in the outer side of the apical article; one more basal, one more distal and three in a row, one sensillum larger, the other two sharing area of insertion. Median brush of the anterior margin of the pronotum with 2 rows of macrosetae; anterolateral row 6���7 short setae and, after a gap of the length of a scale, 3 progressively longer plumose setae in the anterolateral corner, close to the first lateral comb (Fig. 23). Pronotum with 5 lateral combs, meso- and metonotum with 6 lateral combs with 1���3 (usually 2) macrosetae. Posterolateral combs with 2���3 macrosetae. Some macrosetae of the lateral combs longer than half the length of a thoracic segment. Anterior trichobothrial areas of the pronotum and mesonotum situated on lateral comb N- 2 (antepenultimate). Anterior trichobothrial areas of the metanotum associated with comb N- 1 (penultimate). Posterior trichobothrial areas of the nota associated with the last lateral combs (N). Prosternum and mesosternum subtriangular, slightly wider than long at their bases (Fig. 24). Metasternum clearly wider than long (ratio length/width of prosternum 0.9, of metasternum about 0.84). All thoracic sternites with relatively acute hind margins (Figs. 24���26), bearing macrosetae only in their apical part, concentrated on the margins and not clearly arranged in defined combs; 2 + 2 poorly defined combs visible on the prosternum and mesosternum, composed of 2���4 macrosetae. Combs of metasternum (also 2 + 2) with 3���5 macrosetae and more clearly defined (Fig. 26). Distance between the pair of subapical combs about 3 times the width of a comb. Protibiae approximately 2.6 times longer than wide; mesotibiae 2.8���2.9 times longer than wide and 1.25 times longer than the protibiae; metatibiae about 3.75 times longer than wide and 1.75 times longer than the protibiae. Apart from the usual setae, plumose macrosetae on the tibiae as follows: on tibia I, 2���3 dorsal and 4 ventral, on tibia II, 3 dorsal and 4���6 ventral, and on tibia III 2 dorsal and 6���8 ventral (Fig. 27); all macrosetae shorter than the diameter of the article. Scales of femora rounded. Tibiae without scales. Urotergite I with 1 + 1 bristle-combs. Urotergites II���VI with 3 + 3 combs; urotergites VII and VIII with 2 + 2 combs. Lateral bristle-combs with 3���6 macrosetae, sublateral combs with 3 macrosetae in urotergites II���VI and 4���5 macrosetae in urotergites VII and VIII; submedian combs usually with 2���3 macrosetae, this comb asymmetrically absent on urotergite II of holotype (Fig. 28). Urotergite X trapezoidal, short, the trapezoidal process about 0.32 times longer than wide at the base, with straight or slightly concave hind border, (Fig. 29) and 1 + 1 combs of 5 macrosetae each. Urosternite I without setae, urosternites II���VI with small median comb of 3���4 macrosetae. Urosternites III���VIII with 1 + 1 lateral combs of 5���7 macrosetae. One pair of abdominal styli. Inner process of coxite IX shorter than wide at its base (ratio length/width about 0.86) and 2.5 times longer than the outer process (Fig. 30). Styli 2.25 times longer than the inner process of the coxite. Caudal filaments broken; maximum length of a cercus 1.3 mm, (of the paracercus 1.5 mm). Etymology. This new species is named for the Iranian province where it was collected, Kermanshah. Discussion. This new species, like the previous one, belongs to the ���villosa��� group of the subgenus Sceletolepisma sensu Irish (1996). Inside this diverse group, the new species can be compared with those sharing the following characters: urotergites II���VI with 3 + 3 combs, 2 + 2 combs on urotergite VII, absence of a transverse comb on coxite IX, and 3 papillae on the apical segment of the labial palp. Four species share this combination of characteristics: C. canariense Mendes, Molero, Bach & Gaju, 1993, from the Canary Islands, C. roszkowskii Stach, 1935 from NE Africa and SW Asia, C. halophilum Kaplin, 1981 and C. kuhitangicum Kaplin, 1993 (the two latter from Turkmenistan). Ctenolepisma kermanshanum n. sp. differs from C. canariense in several characters. C. kermanshanum n. sp. has a mesosternum that is wider than long and has two pairs of combs on the metasternum, and has longer tibiae (length/width ratio 3.75). In C. canariense the mesosternum is longer than wide and has only one pair of combs, and the tibia ratio is 3.25. The holotype of C. canariense has two pairs of styli, while C. kermanshanum n. sp. has just one pair, but this is not a comparable character since the former is a female and the latter are males. Ctenolepisma halophilum differs from the new Iranian species in lacking posterolateral combs on the nota, which is an unusual character state for Ctenolepisma, suggesting that this Turkmenian species could be placed in another subgenus or genus after a deeper study of characters not considered in traditional descriptions. This revision would need to include comparison with another taxon that shares this character state: Ctenolepisma calvum (Ritter, 1910), described as Peliolepisma calva and included posteriorly in Ctenolepisma by Paclt (1967). Ctenolepisma kuhitangicum appears to be closely related to C. kermanshanum n. sp. The number of combs is the same in both species, but the number of setae per comb is generally higher in C. kuhitangicum. As setal presence could correspond with the smaller size of the Iranian specimens, it could be argued that this number might increase in later moults and that C. kuhitangicum and C. kermanshanum n. sp. could be conspecific. However, significant differences exist, for example, in the shape of the apical part of the thoracic sternites. In C. kermanshanum n. sp. the apical parts of the mesosternum and the metasternum are more acute and, apparently, all these sternites are longer than they are wide in the species from Turkmenistan (slightly wider than long in C. kermanshanum n. sp.). The tenth urotergite of C. kuhitangicum has a slightly convex hind margin, while in C. kermanshanum n. sp. it is slightly concave; moreover, the ratio length/width of the trapezoidal process of the tergite is 0.27 in the species from Iran and higher (about 0.34) in C. kuhitangicum, based on illustrations in Kaplin (1993). Following the same method, the ratio length/width of the inner process of coxite IX of the male is about 0.69 in C. kuhitangicum and about 0.86 in C. kermanshanum. C. roszkowskii, described from Egypt and Libya and later reported from Palestine (Wygodzinsky, 1942), Israel (Wygodzinsky, 1952; Mendes, 1995) and Turkey (Wygodzinsky, 1959) has, in common with C. canariense, only one pair of large combs on the metasternum, but C. kermanshanum n. sp. also has two pairs of small, clearly separated combs. Urotergite X in C. roszkowskii is clearly longer than in C. kermanshanum n. sp., based on the illustrations in Stach (1935). The number of lateral notal combs is greater in C. roszkowskii (7���9 on meso- and metathorax) than in C. kermanshanum n. sp., (5���6), and the number of setae in the thoracic and abdominal combs is also greater in C. roszkowskii. The prosternum has 3���4 pairs of well-defined combs with up to more than 10 macrosetae in C. roszkowskii, but in C. kermanshanum n. sp. there are only 2 pairs of poorly defined combs with no more than 4 or 5 macrosetae. The specimens on which Stach based his original description were larger (length 10 mm) and the specimens of the new species are clearly smaller (5.5 mm).The type specimens of both species bear only one pair of styli, which suggests they could be juveniles, but otherwise they seem to be mature specimens, and the previously mentioned characters are sufficient for separation., Published as part of Kahrarian, Morteza, Molero, Rafael & Gaju, Miquel, 2016, The genus Ctenolepisma (Zygentoma: Lepismatidae) in Western Iran, with description of three new species, pp. 217-230 in Zootaxa 4093 (2) on pages 225-228, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4093.2.4, http://zenodo.org/record/270964

Kahrarian, Morteza, Molero, Rafael, Gaju, Miquel (2016): The genus Ctenolepisma (Zygentoma: Lepismatidae) in Western Iran, with description of three new species. Zootaxa 4093 (2): 217-230, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4093.2.4

Ctenolepisma (Sceletolepisma) sagartianum Molero, Kahrarian & Gaju, new species Figs. 10���20 Type material. Holotype: one male from Tag-e Bostan Mount, under rocks, (N 34 �� 23 ��� E 47 ��07���, elev. 1488 m) Kermanshah County, Kermanshah, Iran, June, 2013 (Ref. MNCN: Cat. Types N. 2606, mounted on a slide). Paratypes: one female from Tag-e Bostan Mount, in the ashes and remnants of burnt grass, (N 34 �� 23 ��� E 47 ��07���, elev. 1488 m), Kermanshah County, Kermanshah, Iran, October, 2013 (UCO, Ref. Z 2499); 4 males and 2 females (one mounted on a slide) from Bistoon Mountain, under rocks, (N 34 �� 23 ��� E 47 �� 26 ���, elev. 1116 m), Harsin County, Kermanshah, Iran, November, 2013 (UCO, Ref. Z 2500); 1 male and 2 females from the same locality and date (UCO, Ref. Z 2501) and 1 female from the same locality, June, 2013 (UCO, Ref. Z 2502). All specimens deposited in UCO, except the holotype, which has been deposited in MNCN. Description. Body length up to 6.7 mm. Males with a length greater than 5 mm and females longer than 5.5 mm considered to be adults. Shape of the body subcylindrical, with the thorax very slightly wider than the abdomen base. Epidermal pigment brownish in specimens preserved in ethanol, more intense on appendages. Macrosetae hyaline to brown-yellowish. Dorsal scales with dark pigment. Some scales of the lateral parts of the nota larger than the rest, others showing an indentation corresponding with bare spots (Fig. 10). Setation of the head and eyes typical of the genus. Antennae broken (maximum length preserved: 3.5 mm). Apical article of maxillary palp about 6 times longer than wide and as long as the penultimate article (Fig. 11). Distal article of labial palp approximately 1.2 times longer than wide, with three sensory papillae arranged in a single row (Fig. 12); low number (usually 2) of isolated sensilla. Median brush of the anterior margin of the pronotum with 2���3 rows of macrosetae; anterolateral row with 6���8 short, smooth (or not clearly plumose) setae. All nota with 6���8 lateral combs with 1���5 (usually 3���4) associated macrosetae and 2 posterolateral combs with 4 macrosetae. Some macrosetae of the lateral combs very long, nearly as long as half the length of a thoracic segment. Anterior trichobothrial areas of the pronotum and mesonotum situated on lateral comb N- 2 (antepenultimate). Anterior trichobothrial areas of the metanotum associated with comb N- 1 (penultimate). Posterior trichobothrial areas of the nota associated with the last lateral combs (N). Prosternum subtriangular, as long as wide at its base, with marginal setae in its posterior part, occupying nearly half the length of the lateral margins; row of thin, long setae in each anterolateral corner. This sternite bearing 2���3 + 2���3 combs of macrosetae, irregularly and asymmetrically arranged. Each comb with 2���8 macrosetae (Fig. 13). Mesosternum length about 1.3 times greater than that of the prosternum; the marginal setae inserted only in the apical part, at about a quarter of the length of the lateral sides; 2���3 pairs of combs with 2���7 macrosetae each (Fig. 14). Metasternum clearly shorter than wide at its base (ratio length/width about 0.81), with two pairs of lateral combs of 5���8 macrosetae (Figs. 15, 16). Distance between the antedistal combs about 2.7 times the width of a comb. Hind margin of all thoracic sternites convex, relatively acute in the prosternum and mesosternum and only very slightly truncated in the metasternum. Protibiae 2.9���3 times longer than wide; mesotibiae 3.2���3.3 times longer than wide and 1.2 times longer than protibiae; metatibiae 3.9���4 times longer than wide and 1.65 times longer than protibiae. Apart from the usual setae, tibiae with plumose macrosetae as follows: on tibia I and II, 3 dorsal and 4 ventral, and on tibia III 3 dorsal and 6 ventral (see Fig. 17); all macrosetae shorter than the diameter of the article. Tibiae without scales, those of the femora rounded. Urotergite I with 1 + 1 bristle-combs. Urotergites II���VII with 3 + 3 combs; urotergite VIII with 2 + 2 combs. Sublateral and lateral bristle-combs with 4���6, infralateral combs with 5���7 macrosetae. Urotergite X trapezoidal, with 1 + 1 combs of 6 macrosetae, the trapezoidal process with a straight hind margin; ratio length/width at the base about 0.37 (Fig. 18). Urosternite I without setae, III���VIII each with 1 + 1 lateral bristle-combs with 8���10 macrosetae; urosternites II���VI each with a submedian comb bearing 6���9 macrosetae. Two pairs of abdominal styli; second pair present in specimens longer than 6 mm. In males, inner process of the coxite IX about as long as wide at its base and 4 times longer than the outer process (Fig. 19). In female, inner process of coxite IX length equal to width up to 1.1 times longer than wide at its base and 4 times longer than the outer process. Ovipositor with 32���33 divisions, apex surpassing tip of the inner process of coxite IX by 1.4 times their length (Fig. 20). Styli long; styli of segment VII 1.4 times longer than the inner process of coxite IX (in a female 6.5 mm long), coxites IX 3 times longer than inner process of the coxite. Ovipositor relatively short, not surpass stylus apex. Apices of gonapophyses rounded and unsclerotized. Caudal filaments broken; maximum length preserved in a cercus, 3.5 mm; in a paracercus, 4 mm. Etymology. The specific name of this new taxon refers to the Sagartians, an ancient tribe that lived on the Iranian Plateau. Discussion. Ctenolepisma (Sceletolepisma) sagartianum n. sp. belongs to the subgenus Sceletolepisma sensu Irish (1987) due to the presence of median combs of macrosetae on the urosternites. The redefinition of Sceletolepisma and the split of the genus proposed by Kaplin (1993) is not accepted, according to Irish (1996) and in accordance with our personal and partially published studies (Molero et al. 2010; Molero et al. 2012). The new species belongs to the ���villosa��� group within the subgenus Sceletolepisma as defined by Irish (1987) in bearing median combs of macrosetae on urosternites II���VI, no macrosetae on urosternite I, and urosternite II with only median combs. The ���villosa��� group is widespread in Africa and Eurasia, with more than 20 species, but only three share the following characteristics: 3 + 3 combs on urotergites II���VII, 3 sensory papillae in the distal labial palpomere and the absence of a transverse comb on coxite IX. Ctenolepisma sagartianum n. sp. is compared primarily with these three species: C. africanellum Wygodzinsky, 1955 from South Africa, C. guanche Mendes 1993 from Gomera, Canary Islands and C. kervillei Silvestri, 1911, described from Egypt and also reported from Syria (and probably Iraq but not Iran, as discussed below). C. guanche has only one pair of metasternal combs, while C. sagartianum n. sp. has two pairs. The urosternal combs of C. guanche bear fewer setae, the inner process of the coxite IX has a lower ratio length/width, and the ovipositor is shorter than it is in C. sagartianum n. sp. Although the original description of C. guanche indicates that the ovipositor is broken in its terminal part, its preserved portion surpasses the length of the inner process of coxite IX by more than 3 times its own length (Mendes, 1993), and in C. sagartianum n. sp., the intact and wellpreserved ovipositor surpasses the inner process by only 1.5 times its length. Ctenolepisma africanellum (described as C. africanella by Wygodzinsky) is clearly different from C. sagartianum n. sp. as follows: adults of C. africanellum are longer (up to 9.5 mm), while the longest specimens of C. sagartianum n. sp. are 6.7 mm long; C. africanellum has 5 prosternal combs and 4���5 macrosetae in the submedian urosternal combs, whereas C. sagartianum n. sp. has 2���3 prosternal combs and 6���9 macrosetae in the submedian urosternal combs; coxites IX have a greater length/width ratio in C. africanellum, as shown in Figs. 356 and 358 in the original description (in females, about 1.5 and only 1.1 in C. sagartianum n. sp.); the ovipositor of C. africanellum is longer, clearly surpassing the apex of styli (not surpassing in C. sagartianum n. sp.) and the South African species has more divisions (45, opposed to 32���33 in the new species). Because of geographic proximity and similarity of characteristics, C. kervillei deserves a more detailed comparison with C. sagartianum n. sp. We were not able to fully compare C. sagartianum n. sp. with the original and supplementary descriptions of C. kervillei (Silvestri 1911, 1926). By current standards these descriptions are inadequate and lack many of the important characteristics used now for taxonomy of Ctenolepisma, such as the position of the trichobothrial areas, the number of macrosetae of the combs, and the shape of the thoracic sternites. Even though the description of C. kervillei needs updating, we think the characters given above are sufficient to conclude that the material identified here is a new species and does not fit with Silvestri���s species. In addition to Silvestri���s description we have used the comments given by Irish (1991) for C. kervillei specimens identified from Oman in our study of Ctenolepisma sagartianum n. sp. One point of contention is the number of styli. Ctenolepisma kervillei was described as bearing only one pair of styli. The original description (Silvestri 1911), supplemented later (Silvestri 1926), was based on specimens from Syria. Nevertheless, Irish (1991) stated that specimens from Oman bearing two pairs of styli were conspecific with C. kervillei, taking their chaetotaxy into account. This discrepancy in stylus number was attributed to the fact that the type material of C. kervillei Irish examined was composed of juvenile specimens (���not quite mature���, according Irish). We doubt that the specimens from Oman are actually conspecific with Silvestri���s specimens, but regardless of this issue (which would require the examination of type and Oman material), there is a significant size difference. The biggest specimen of C. sagartianum n. sp. is 6.7 mm long, and the second pair of styli is developed when the insects have reached approximately 6 mm. However, Silvestri���s specimens with one pair of styli were longer than adult C. sagartianum n. sp. with two pairs of styli. Specimens from Syria were about 8 mm. Therefore, if C. kervillei develops a second pair of styli, either this development happens when specimens are longer than 8 mm, or perhaps never happens, if the population from Oman correspond to a different species. The specimens from Iran correspond to a taxon of a smaller size since 6 -mm specimens with two pairs of styli can be considered adults. Other characters given in Silvestri���s descriptive notes and drawings of C. kervillei that allow the detection of differences with C. sagartianum n. sp. can be discussed. The ratio length/width of the last article of the maxillary palp/length of the penultimate article is clearly greater than 1 in the C. kervillei drawing by Silvestri (1911), but in C. sagartianum n. sp. this ratio is about 1. The number of macrosetae of the combs of urotergite X is apparently 8 or more in C. kervillei, rather than 6 as in C. sagartianum n. sp. The ratio length/width of the inner process of the coxite IX in the male is greater than 1 in C. kervillei, while in C. sagartianum n. sp. this ratio is 1. Silvestri���s description indicated that the inner process of the coxite IX was ���quam stilus parus magis quam dimidium breviore���, i.e., slightly shorter than half the length of the stylus. The examination of the drawings of Silvestri given in his work of 1926 allows to state that the styli are about 2.2 times longer than the inner process of the coxite IX, but in our specimens, the styli are more than 3 times longer than coxite IX, which are clearly different proportions. If the characters of the specimens studied by Silvestri can be interpreted as juvenile specimens, the conclusion is the same as given above: the specimens studied here from Iran are smaller, but adults. Finally, in the original description of C. kervillei, nothing is said about the chaetotaxy of the prosternum. However, Irish (1991), upon examination of the type material and additional material from Oman, stated that this species possessed 4 pairs of combs of macrosetae. Since C. sagartianum n. sp. has only 2���3 irregular combs of macrosetae on the prosternum, it does not fit the specimens studied by Irish. This difference further confirms that they are not conspecific with the authentic C. kervillei, nor with the specimens from Oman. Ctenolepisma kervillei has been reported from Iran, but the record is a mistake. Silvestri (1923) mentioned that two young specimens were collected at Jebel Hamrin, by a Capt. Evans in 1918. Jebel Hamrin is a mountain in northeastern Iraq, so C. kervillei still has not been reported for Iran, although the mentioned mountain is close to the Iranian border and C. kervillei may occur on western Iran (another possibility is that Silvestri erroneously associated those specimens to C. kervillei and they were actually C. sagartianum n. sp.)., Published as part of Kahrarian, Morteza, Molero, Rafael & Gaju, Miquel, 2016, The genus Ctenolepisma (Zygentoma: Lepismatidae) in Western Iran, with description of three new species, pp. 217-230 in Zootaxa 4093 (2) on pages 221-225, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4093.2.4, http://zenodo.org/record/270964

Ctenolepisma iranicum Molero, Kahrarian & Gaju, new species Figs. 1���9 Type material. Holotype: female, Shabankareh village, (N 34 �� 52 ��� E 46 �� 30 ���, elev. 1632 m), Paveh County, Kermanshah, Iran. November, 2013. Paratypes: 3 males and 1 female from the same sample, collected in the litter around oak trees (Quercus infectoria) and under rocks (Ref. UCO Z 2497), and 4 males and 3 females from Bistoon Mountain, under rocks, (N 34 �� 23 ��� E 47 �� 26 ���, elev. 1116 m), Harsin County, Kermanshah, Iran. November 2013 (Ref. UCO Z 2498). The holotype and two paratypes (one from each locality) are each mounted on a slide. All specimens have been deposited in UCO, except the holotype, which has been deposited in MNCN (Cat. Types No. 2605). Description. Body length: 9 mm in the holotype (remaining specimens are somewhat smaller; all adults at least 7 mm long). Body fusiform, with the thorax slightly wider than the abdomen, maximum thorax width 1.95 mm. Epidermic pigment brownish in microscopic slides, more intense on appendages. Macrosetae hyaline to brown-yellowish. Scales with dark pigment. Some scales of the lateral parts of the nota larger than the rest; some scales dispersed over the dorsal surface with an indentation corresponding with bare spots. Setation of the head as in other species of the genus, very abundant. Eyes black, composed of about 12 ommatidia. Antennae broken (maximum length preserved: 5 mm). Maxillary palp with long articles (Fig. 1), the distal article about 6.5���8 times longer than wide and slightly longer or shorter than the penultimate. Length and width of apical article of the labial palp equal, with five sensory papillae arranged in a single row. Pronotum with a brush of macrosetae in the central part of the anterior margin, with 2���4 rows of macrosetae. Extending from this brush to the anterolateral corner of the notum, a row of 11���15 short smooth setae. Ten lateral combs with 2���7 associated macrosetae each and 2 posterolateral combs with 7 or 8 macrosetae. Mesonotum and metanotum with 10���12 lateral combs, each comb with 2���7 associated macrosetae; the posterolateral combs with 7���9 macrosetae. Anterior trichobothrial areas of the pronotum situated on lateral comb N- 3; those of the mesonotum associated with the antepenultimate (N- 2) lateral comb: those of the metanotum associated with the penultimate (N- 1) lateral comb. All posterior trichobothria associated with the last lateral comb (N) on the three nota. Prosternum heartshaped, with its maximum width 1.1 times greater than its length in the midline (Fig. 2), with a broadly rounded posterior margin and slightly truncated apex; 3���4 lateral combs with 3���10 macrosetae; antedistal combs bearing few setae (3���5) and arranged in a single row, but more anterior combs bearing a higher number of macrosetae arranged in two irregular rows (Fig. 3). Mesosternum as long as wide at its base or slightly longer; metasternum clearly wider than long (ratio length/ width about 0.75); hind margins of these sternites more truncated than hind margin of prosternum (Figs. 4, 5). Both sterna with only one pair of oblique antedistal combs of 17���21 macrosetae arranged in two irregular rows. Distance between the combs 1.5���2 times the width of a comb. Protibiae 2.8���3 times longer than wide; mesotibiae 3���3.3 times longer than wide and about 1.2 times longer than the protibiae; metatibiae 3.6���4 times longer than wide and 1.5���1.75 times longer than the protibiae. Apart from the usual setae on the tibiae, plumose macrosetae as follows: on tibia I, 2 dorsal and 4 ventral; on tibia II, 2 dorsal and 6 ventral; on tibia III 2���4 dorsal and 7���8 ventral (see Fig. 6); all macrosetae shorter than diameter of the article. Tibia without scales. Scales of femora rounded. Urotergite I with 1 + 1 bristle-combs; urotergites II���VI with 3 + 3 combs; urotergites VII and VIII with 2 + 2 combs. Submedian bristle-combs with 7���11 macrosetae, lateral combs with 7���12, and sublateral combs with 8���13. Urotergite X trapezoidal, with concave posterior margin and 1 + 1 combs of 12���13 macrosetae (Fig. 7). Urosternites I and II without setae, III���VIII with 1 + 1 lateral bristle-combs and 15���21 macrosetae. Distance between lateral combs of a urosternite 3.1���4.4 times wider than the width of a comb. Two pairs of abdominal styli. In male, inner process of coxite IX about 0.9 times longer than wide at its base and 2 times longer than the outer process. Styli IX 3.2 times longer than the inner process (Fig. 8). In the female, process of coxite IX about 1.75 times longer than wide at its base and 2.7 times longer than the outer process. Ovipositor with 41���48 divisions, its apex surpassing the tip of the inner process of coxite IX by 3���5 times its length (Fig. 9). Styli long, those of segment IX 2.6 times longer than the outer process of the coxite, tip of the ovipositor surpassing the coxite apex by 0.5���0.6 times its length. Apices of gonapophyses unsclerotized. Caudal filaments broken; maximum length preserved 4.5 mm (both in the cerci and the paracercus). Etymology. The specific name of this new taxon refers to the country where it has been found, Iran. Discussion. The new species is related to C. ciliatum, C. longicaudatum Escherich, 1905 and C. armeniacum Molero, Gaju, Bach & Mendes, 2010, sharing with them the following characteristics: abdominal setation (absence of median combs on urosternites, 3 + 3 combs of macrosetae on urotergites II���VI), the trapezoidal shape of the tenth urotergite, the distribution of scales on the legs (rounded on the femora and absent on tibiae and tarsi), the distribution of trichobothria on the nota and the smooth setae of the anterolateral row of the pronotum. However, in C. iranicum n. sp., the hind borders of the thoracic sterna are straight, giving a truncate appearance (more noticeable in the mesosternum and metasternum), whereas in the other species the posterior angles of these sternites are acute or rounded. Moreover, the combs of macrosetae are arranged in two irregular rows, as in C. armeniacum, which distinguishes the new species from C. ciliatum and C. longicaudatum. But the number of setae of these combs is fewer in C. iranicum n. sp. and there is only one pair of combs in the mesosternum, while there are 2 or 3 pairs in C. armeniacum (compare Figs. 9���14 and 28 ���33 in Molero et al. 2010 with Figs. 2���5 of the new species in this work). The number of macrosetae in the abdominal combs of C. armeniacum is also clearly greater. The pigmentation, the larger size and the wider thorax of C. longicaudatum easily distinguishes this species from C. iranicum n. sp. The key characteristics for distinguishing this new species from C. ciliatum and C. longicaudatum are the shape of the apex of the thoracic sternites, and the setation of the meso- and metasternum (the macrosetae of the combs are arranged in one row in the two previously known species but are arranged in two irregular rows in the new species). Other characteristics are quite variable in the more widely distributed species, particularly in C. ciliatum, which is also present in Iran, and the description of these characteristics in C. iranicum n. sp. enters within this margin of variability. As the thoracic sternites (and other features, such as the cover of scales) have not always been examined meticulously, it is possible that some taxa different from C. ciliatum have been overlooked. As happened with C. armeniacum, we have found that some specimens identified and published previously as C. ciliatum (from Asia and even from other continents where this species has been reported) actually correspond with other undescribed species of Ctenolepisma., Published as part of Kahrarian, Morteza, Molero, Rafael & Gaju, Miquel, 2016, The genus Ctenolepisma (Zygentoma: Lepismatidae) in Western Iran, with description of three new species, pp. 217-230 in Zootaxa 4093 (2) on pages 218-219, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4093.2.4, http://zenodo.org/record/270964

Smith, Graeme B. (2016): Revision of the Genus Anisolepisma (Zygentoma: Lepismatidae: Acrotelsatinae). Records of the Australian Museum 68 (6): 269-312, DOI: 10.3853/j.2201-4349.68.2016.1662, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3853/j.2201-4349.68.2016.1662

Acrotelsella Silvestri, 1935 Stylifera Stach, 1932: 333, 345 pro parte. Acrotelsella Silvestri, 1935: 307. Type species. Acrotelsa producta Escherich, 1905 by original designation., Published as part of Smith, Graeme B., 2016, On some Silverfish Taxa from Tasmania (Zygentoma: Lepismatidae and Nicoletiidae), pp. 45-80 in Records of the Australian Museum 68 (2) on page 66, DOI: 10.3853/j.2201-4349.68.2016.1652, http://zenodo.org/record/5238073, {"references":["Silvestri, F. 1935. Marquesan Thysanura. Bulletin of the Bernice Pauahi Bishop Museum 114: 305 - 312.","Stach, J. 1932. III. Die Apterygoten aus den Galapagos-Inseln. Meddelelser fra det Zoologiske Museum Oslo 29: 331 - 346, tabs II - IV.","Escherich, K. 1905. Das System der Lepismatiden. Zoologica (Stuttgart) 43: 1 - 164."]}

Heterolepisma Escherich, 1905 Heterolepisma Escherich, 1905: 63. Isolepisma Escherich, 1905: 61. Notolepisma Tillyard, 1924: 241. Type species. Lepisma pampeana Silvestri, 1902 by subsequent designation of Paclt, 1967: 25., Published as part of Smith, Graeme B., 2016, On some Silverfish Taxa from Tasmania (Zygentoma: Lepismatidae and Nicoletiidae), pp. 45-80 in Records of the Australian Museum 68 (2) on page 58, DOI: 10.3853/j.2201-4349.68.2016.1652, http://zenodo.org/record/5238073, {"references":["Escherich, K. 1905. Das System der Lepismatiden. Zoologica (Stuttgart) 43: 1 - 164.","Tillyard, R. J. 1924. Primitive wingless insects. Part I. The silverfish, bristletails and their allies (Order Thysanura). New Zealand Journal of Science and Technology 7: 232 - 242.","Paclt, J. 1967. Thysanura. Fam. Lepidotrichidae, Maindroniidae, Lepismatidae. Genera Insectorum 218 e: 1 - 86."]}

Smith, Graeme B. (2016): On some Silverfish Taxa from Tasmania (Zygentoma: Lepismatidae and Nicoletiidae). Records of the Australian Museum 68 (2): 45-80, DOI: 10.3853/j.2201-4349.68.2016.1652, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3853/j.2201-4349.68.2016.1652

LEPISMATIDAE Ctenolepisma Escherich, 1905 † Ctenolepisma (Ctenolepisma) electrans Mendes, 1998:899 [Dominican amber] Ctenolepisma (Ctenolepisma) rothschildi Silvestri, 1907. Irish, 1995:562 Lepisma Linnaeus, 1758 Lepisma saccharina Linnaeus, 1758. Wolcott, 1927b:135, Published as part of Perez-Gelabert, Daniel E., 2008, Arthropods of Hispaniola (Dominican Republic and Haiti): A checklist and bibliography, pp. 1-530 in Zootaxa 1831 (1) on page 302, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.1831.1.1

Lepisma [gen. nov.] Pedes VI, cursorii. Os Palpis II. Cauda setosa: setis extensis. Corpus squamis imbricatum., Published as part of Linnaeus, Carolus, 1758, Systema Naturae per regna tria naturae: secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis, Stockholm :Laurentius Salvius on page 608, DOI: 10.5962/bhl.title.542, http://zenodo.org/record/3922206

Lepisma saccharina [spec. nov.] L. squamosa, cauda triplici. Brown. jam. 425. Setoura subargentea, cauda setosa, setis hirsutis. Adam. microgr. t. 28. f 147. Habitat in America inter saccharum & utensilia domestica, inde per Europam vulgaris, hodie in S{?X} incepit., Published as part of Linnaeus, Carolus, 1758, Systema Naturae per regna tria naturae: secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis, Stockholm :Laurentius Salvius on page 608, DOI: 10.5962/bhl.title.542, http://zenodo.org/record/3922206

Lepisma terrestris [spec. nov.] L. nuda, cauda triplici. Habitat in Europa. Similis Podurae sed major, corpore toto albo cylindrico, Antennae corporis dimidii longitudine, obtusae ut in Podura., Published as part of Linnaeus, Carolus, 1758, Systema Naturae per regna tria naturae: secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis, Stockholm :Laurentius Salvius on page 608, DOI: 10.5962/bhl.title.542, http://zenodo.org/record/3922206