Search

Campoplex absitus sp. nov. Figs. 1���2 Material examined. Holotype: female, Shaanxi, Hanzhong Liubaxian, 20.VII.2013, Tu Binbin, No 201308253 (ZJUH). Description. Female (Fig. 1) holotype. Body length 4.5 mm, fore wing length 3.5 mm. Head. Antenna with 23 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.3�� longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 2E) granulose. Clypeus (Fig. 2E) granulose, slightly convex, apical margin almost truncated, thick medially. Malar space granulose, 0.45�� basal width of mandible. Mandible with a very weak lamella, upper tooth slightly longer than lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 2F) 1.2�� ocello-ocular distance and 1.8�� distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, subpolished, not swollen behind eyes. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina above mandible base. Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose dorsally, mat, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 2G) granulose, notauli indistinct. Scutellum and metanotum granulose. Mesopleuron (Fig. 2B) granulose, weakly trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Metapleuron (Fig. 2B) granulose. Propodeum (Fig. 2C) with anterior transverse carina far from base, area basalis triangular, long and narrow; area superomedia granulose, polished; area petiolaris rugose; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, slightly depressed; all carina distinctly developed; propodeal spiracle small and round. Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 2A) areolet present and with a short stalk, emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 2.0�� longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (75��). Hind wing with nervellus slightly inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.2. Legs. Hind femur 4.6�� longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.5�� as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate. Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 2H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, without dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove. First tergite 2.3�� longer than width of postpetiole. Postpetiole and second tergite granulose, mat. Second tergite 0.9�� as long as first tergite, 1.8�� longer than its apical width; thyridium round, its distance from basal margin of tergite 2.0�� its diameter. Third tergite 0.8�� longer than its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.8�� longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 2D) gradually upcurved. Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth, palpi, tegula, fore and mid trochanters and trochantellus, and hind trochantellus, yellow; scape and pedicel blackish brown; fore leg yellowish brown except coxa and telotarsus brown; mid leg yellowish brown except coxa and telotarsus brown, tibia apically infuscated; hind leg with coxa and trochanter black, femur, tibia subbasally and apically, tarsus from basal 0.7 on brown, remainder of hind leg whitish yellow; metasoma entirely black. Distribution. China (Shaanxi). Comparative diagnosis. This species is similar to C. taenius sp. nov., but differs from the latter by having interocellar distance 1.2�� ocello-ocular distance, propodeal anterior transverse carina far removed from base, fore wing external angles of second discal cell less acute (75��), and third metasomal tergite 0.8�� longer than its apical width. Etymology. Name derived from ���absitus��� (Latin for ���remote���), because its propodeal anterior transverse carina is far removed from base of propodeum., Published as part of Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van & Chen, Xue-Xin, 2021, The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China, pp. 1-121 in Zootaxa 5066 (1) on pages 9-11, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5653939

Campoplex granulosus sp. nov. Figs. 35���36 Material examined. Holotype: female, Xinjiang, Kuchewuqia, 2.IX.2004, Tu Erxun, No 20060145 (ZJUH). Paratypes: 1 female, Hubei, Shennongjia, 27.VIII.1982, He Junhua, No 825746; 4 females, 3 males, Jilin, Dongliao, 17. VI.1988, Zhao Mingcheng, host: pupa of Coleophora dahurica, No 883937 (4), 883936 (3); 1 male, Jilin, Dongliao, 17.VII.1988, Nie Shenglong, No 860159; 1 male, Jilin, Tonghua, 1.VIII.1994, Lou Juxian, No 976672; 1 female, Neimeng, Baotou Wudangzhao, 21.VIII.2000, Ma Yun, No 200100557; 1 female, Shandong, Bowen, 6.IX.1984, No 879198; 1 female, Xinjiang, Afanti Duolangxiang, 31.VIII.2004, Tu Erxun, No 200601193; 1 female, 1male, Xinjiang, Badan Kuerli, 8.VIII.2001, Hu Hongying, No 20036790, 20036821; 1 female, Xinjiang, Bazhou, IX.1983, Song Meijie, No 833962; 1 female, Xinjiang, Fukang Jiuyunjie, 17.VIII.2004, Tu Erxun, No 200600762; 1 female, Xinjiang, Hetian Moyutuohula, 30.VIII.2004, Tu Erxun, No 200601145; 1 female, Xinjiang, Kuerle Awatixiang, 3.IX.2004, Tu Erxun, No 200601415; 1 female, Xinjiang, Maigaiti, 27.VIII.2004, Tu Erxun, No 200600937; 1 female, Xinjiang, Shachexian, 19.VII.1991, He Junhua, No 912987, 913031, 912991; 1 female, Xinjiang, Shule, Tazihongxiang, 26.VIII.2004, Tu Erxun, No 200600908; 4 females, 2 males, Xinjiang, Wulumuqi, 26.VIII.1987, Ma Qi, No 880068, 880128, 880133, 880136, 880129, 880130; 3 females, 2 males, Xinjiang, Wulumuqi, 3.VIII.2001, Hu Hongying, No 20036042, 20036031, 20036014, 20036022, 20036027; 1 female, Xinjiang, Yuli Talimuxiang, 4.IX.2004, Tu Erxun, No 200601451. Description. Female (Fig. 35) holotype. Body length 4.3 mm, fore wing length 3.5 mm. Head. Antenna with 24 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.2�� longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 36E) granulose. Clypeus (Fig. 36E) granulose, slightly convex, apical margin truncated, thick medially. Malar space granulose, 0.5�� basal width of mandible. Mandible with a very weak lamella, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 36F) 1.5�� ocelloocular distance and 1.8�� distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, mat, swollen behind eyes. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina above mandible base. Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose dorsally, mat, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 36G) granulose, notauli indistinct. Scutellum and metanotum granulose. Mesopleuron (Fig. 36B) granulose, weakly trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Metapleuron (Fig. 36B) granulose. Propodeum (Fig. 36C) with area basalis triangular, long and narrow; area superomedia granulose, mat; area petiolaris trans-striate; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, not depressed; all carina distinctly developed; propodeal spiracle small and oval. Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 36A) without areolet. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 2.1�� longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (70��). Hind wing with nervellus vertical, intercepted at lower 0.25. Legs. Hind femur 4.0�� longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.55�� as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate, its teeth weak. Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 36H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, without dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove. First tergite 2.5�� longer than width of postpetiole. Postpetiole and second tergite granulose, mat. Second tergite 0.7�� as long as first tergite, equal to its apical width; thyridium round, its distance from basal margin of tergite 1.5�� its diameter. Third tergite 0.9�� as long as its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.4�� longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 36D) gradually upcurved. Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth, palpi, yellow; scape and pedicel brown; tegula whitish; fore and mid trochanter and trochantellus whitish yellow, telotarsus brownish; remainder of fore and mid legs orange yellow; hind coxa black, trochanter basally blackish brown, femur and tibia yellowish brown, extreme apex of femur infuscated, tibia infuscated subbasally and apically, tarsus blackish brown except basal 0.8 yellowish brown; first metasomal segment entirely black; second tergite except apical laterally, third tergite except apically, fourth to seventh segments except laterally, blackish brown; remainder of metasoma reddish brown. Variation. Antenna with 24���26 flagellomeres, fore wing areolet absent or present and with 3rs-m vein incomplete, length of second tergite of metasoma 1.0���1.6�� its apical width, scape and pedicel yellowish brown to blackish brown. Distribution. China (Hubei, Jilin, Neimenggu, Shandong, Xinjiang). Comparative diagnosis. This species is similar to C. lobatus sp. nov., but differs from the latter by having first flagellomere 1.2�� longer than second flagellomere, mesopleuron granulose, thyridium separated from basal margin of tergite by 1.5�� its diameter, mid and hind leg largely yellowish brown, and metasoma colour different. Etymology. Name derived from ���granosus��� (Latin for ���granular���), because its body sculpture is largely granulose., Published as part of Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van & Chen, Xue-Xin, 2021, The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China, pp. 1-121 in Zootaxa 5066 (1) on pages 53-56, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5653939

Campoplex parassosae sp. nov. Figs. 57–58 Material examined. Holotype: female, Zhejiang, Anji Longwangshan, 11.IV.1999, Wu Hong, No 200011824 (ZJUH). Description. Female (Fig. 57) holotype. Body length 5.5 mm, fore wing length 4.0 mm. Head. Antenna with 29 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.1× longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 58E) granulose. Clypeus (Fig. 58E) sparsely punctate, mat, slightly convex, apical margin truncated, thick medially. Malar space granulose, 0.5× basal width of mandible. Mandible without lamella, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 58F) equal to ocello-ocular distance and 1.9× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, subpolished, not swollen behind eyes. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina at mandible base. Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose with sparse punctures dorsally, mat, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 58G) granulose, scutellum and metanotum granulose. Mesopleuron (Fig. 58B) granulose with sparse punctures, trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Metapleuron granulose. Propodeum (Fig. 58C) granulose; area basalis triangular, long and narrow; area superomedia granulose, long and narrow; area petiolaris trans-striate; area superomedia area confluent with area petiolaris, not depressed; medio-longitudinal carina and latero-longitudinal carina weak; propodeal spiracle small and round. Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 58A) areolet present and without stalk, emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 2.0× longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (70°). Hind wing with nervellus inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.2. Legs. Hind femur 5.0× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.5× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate basally. Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 58H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, dorso-lateral carina present, with a shallow lateral groove. First tergite 3.1× longer than width of postpetiole. Postpetiole and second tergite granulose, subsequent tergites largely granulose. Second tergite 0.8× as long as first tergite, 1.6× longer than its apical width; thyridium round, its distance from basal margin of tergite 1.5× its diameter. Third tergite equal to its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.7× longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 58D) gradually upcurved. Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth, palpi, tegula, fore and mid trochanters and trochantellus, and hind trochantellus, whitish yellow; scape and pedicel blackish brown; all coxae blackish brown; fore and mid legs from trochantellus on yellowish brown except telotarsus brown; hind trochanter and femur blackish brown, tibia basally and apically infuscated, tarsus brown except basal tarsomere 0.8 yellowish brown; metasoma entirely black with apical segments slightly blackish brown. Distribution. China (Zhejiang). Comparative diagnosis. This species runs in the key by Maheshwary & Gupta (1977) to C. pusillus Gupta & Maheshwary, 1977 (now known as C. assosae Kittel, 2016), but differs from the latter by having apical margin of clypeus truncated, areolet present, and hind femur blackish brown. Etymology. Name derived from “par” (Greek for “near”), and the specific name “assosae”, because this new species is similar to C. assosae.

Campoplex liuae sp. nov. Figs. 41���42 Material examined. Holotype: female, Shanxi, Lishan Xiachuan, 25.VII.2012, Liu Zhen, No 201208778 (ZJUH). Description. Female (Fig. 41) holotype. Body length 5.2 mm, fore wing length 3.8 mm. Head. Antenna with 31 flagellomeres; first flagellomere equal to the length of second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 42E) granulose-punctate. Clypeus (Fig. 42E) granulose with sparse punctures, slightly convex, apical margin almost truncated. Malar space granulose, 0.5�� basal width of mandible. Mandible with a weak lamella, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 42F) 1.5�� ocello-ocular distance and 2.0�� distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, subpolished. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina slightly above mandible base. Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose-punctate dorsally, subpolished, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 42G) granulose punctate. Scutellum punctate and rugose posteriorly. Metanotum granulose. Mesopleuron (Fig. 42B) punctate, trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Metapleuron (Fig. 42B) granulose-punctate, punctures smaller and sparser than that on mesopleuron. Propodeum (Fig. 42C) granulose; area basalis triangular with carina posteriorly emerged; area superomedia granulose; area petiolaris granulose medially, rugose laterally; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, slightly depressed; all carina strongly developed; propodeal spiracle small and oval. Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 42A) areolet present and with a short stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 2.0�� longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a slightly distad of M&RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (60��). Hind wing with nervellus inclivous, intercepted at its middle. Legs. Hind femur 4.4�� longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.6�� as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate. Metasoma. Mat. First metasomal segment (Fig. 42H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove absent. First tergite 2.5�� longer than width of postpetiole. Second tergite 0.6�� as long as first tergite, 0.85�� its apical width; thyridium round, its distance from basal margin of tergite equal to its diameter. Third tergite 0.55�� as long as its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.2�� longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 42D) gradually upcurved. Colour. Black. Mandible medially and palpi yellowish brown; antenna, scape and pedicel brown; tegula yellow; fore leg yellowish brown with coxa black and telotarsus brown; mid leg yellowish brown with coxa and telotarsus black, trochanter basally brown; hind leg with coxa and trochanter black, tarsus except basal tarsomere 0.8 brown, remainder of hind leg yellowish brown; metasoma with postpetiole, second to fourth tergites anteriorly and subsequent tergites laterally yellowish brown, remainder of metasoma black. Distribution. China (Shanxi). Comparative diagnosis. This species is similar to C. adustantennalis sp. nov., but differs from the latter by having first flagellomere as long as second flagellomere, malar space, vertex and metanotum granulose, propodeal area basalis triangular and emerged posteriorly, area superomedia without punctures, propodeal carina strong, hind tibia entirely yellowish brown, and the colour of metasoma different. Etymology. This species is named in honour of Prof. Zhen Liu, the collector of the holotype., Published as part of Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van & Chen, Xue-Xin, 2021, The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China, pp. 1-121 in Zootaxa 5066 (1) on pages 62-64, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5653939

Campoplex longiclypeus sp. nov. Figs. 45���46 Material examined. Holotype: female, Xizang, Naqu Naixian, 31.VII.2013, Liu Zhen, No 201408822 (ZJUH). Description. Female (Fig. 45) holotype. Body length 5.5 mm, fore wing length 4.0 mm. Head. Antenna with 30 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.45�� longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 46E) granulose. Clypeus (Fig. 46E) granulose, convex and long, apical margin arched, sharp. Malar space granulose, 0.9�� basal width of mandible. Mandible without lamella, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 46F) 1.5�� ocello-ocular distance and 1.7�� distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, subpolished, swollen behind eyes. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina above mandible base. Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose-punctate, mat, weakly trans-striate on extremely below. Mesoscutum granulose punctate. Scutellum and metanotum granulose. Mesopleuron (Fig. 46B) granulose-punctate, trans-striations below tegula short and weak, speculum smooth and shiny, mesopleural fovea absent. Metapleuron (Fig. 46B) granulose-punctate. Propodeum (Fig. 46C) granulose; area basalis trapezoid; area superomedia granulose; area petiolaris granulose-rugulose; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, not depressed; medio-longitudinal carina present below costulae and absent apically; lateral longitudinal carina absent; other carinae present; propodeal spiracle small and short oval. Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 46A) areolet present and with a long stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its middle. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 1.8�� longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a slightly distad of M&RS. External angles of second discal cell vertical. Hind wing with nervellus intercepted slightly below middle. Legs. Hind femur 5.1�� longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.44�� as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate, teeth very weak. Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 46H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, without dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove. First tergite 2.8�� longer than width of postpetiole. Postpetiole and second tergite granulose. Second tergite 0.85�� as long as first tergite, 1.3�� longer than its apical width; thyridium oval, its distance from basal margin of tergite about its length. Third tergite equal to its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites with emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 2.1�� longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 46D) gradually upcurved. Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth yellow; palpi brown; tegula, scape and pedicel black; pterostigma whitish basally; fore coxa brown except extreme apically yellow, trochanter basally, trochantellus basally, femur ventrally, tibia dorsally and tarsus, blackish brown, remainder of fore leg yellow; mid trochantellus apically and femur extreme basally yellow, tibia medially brownish, remainder of mid leg blackish; hind leg with trochantellus apically, femur extreme basally and tibia dorso-medially brownish, remainder of hind leg black; metasoma entirely black. Distribution. China (Xizang). Comparative diagnosis. This species runs in the key by Maheshwary & Gupta (1977) to C. kalatopensis Gupta & Maheshwary, 1977, but differs from the latter by having clypeus long, mesopleuron granulose-punctate, mediolongitudinal carina absent underneath, lateral carina absent, area petiolaris granulose, the length of areolet shorter than its stalk, and body colour different. Etymology. Name derived from ���longus��� (Latin for ���long���) and ���clypeus��� (Latin for ���clypeus���), because its clypeus is long., Published as part of Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van & Chen, Xue-Xin, 2021, The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China, pp. 1-121 in Zootaxa 5066 (1) on pages 67-69, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5653939, {"references":["Gupta, V. K. & Maheshwary, S. (1977) Ichneumonologia Orientalis, Part IV. The tribe Porizontini (= Campoplegini) (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Oriental Insects Monograph, 5, 1 - 267."]}

Campoplex exareola sp. nov. Figs. 27���28 Material examined. Holotype: female, Jilin, Changbaishan, 4.VIII.1994, Lou Juxian, No 951985 (ZJUH). Description. Female (Fig. 27) holotype. Body length 4.5 mm, fore wing length 3.6 mm. Head. Antenna with 24 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.25�� longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 28E) granulose. Clypeus (Fig. 28E) granulose, not convex, apical margin slightly arched and thick medially. Malar space granulose, 0.65�� basal width of mandible. Mandible with a very weak lamella basally, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 28F) 1.3�� ocello-ocular distance and 1.5�� distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, subpolished, swollen behind eyes. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina slightly above mandible base. Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose dorsally, subpolished, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 28G) granulose, notauli absent. Scutellum granulose with sparse and minute punctures. Metanotum granulose. Mesopleuron (Fig. 28B) granulose with sparse and minute punctures, weakly trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Metapleuron (Fig. 28B) granulose. Propodeum (Fig. 28C) with area basalis triangular, long and narrow; area superomedia finely granulose, subpolished; area petiolaris weakly rugose; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, slightly depressed; costula absent; propodeal spiracle small and oval. Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 28A) areolet absent. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 2.0�� longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (70��). Hind wing with nervellus slightly inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.25. Legs. Hind femur 4.6�� longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.5�� as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate basally, teeth very weak. Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 28H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, without dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove. First tergite 2.5�� longer than width of postpetiole. Second tergite 0.7�� as long as first tergite, 1.1�� longer than its apical width; thyridium oval, its distance from basal margin of tergite 1.5�� its diameter. Third tergite 0.7�� as long as its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 2.0�� longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 28D) gradually upcurved. Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth, palpi and tegula yellowish brown; scape and pedicel blackish brown; all trochantellus yellow; fore leg from trochantellus on yellowish brown, coxa, trochanter and telotarsus blackish brown; mid leg with extreme base of femur, tibia media-externally and basal 0.5 of tarsus yellow, remainder of mid leg brown; hind leg with base and middle of tibia and basal 0.5 of tarsus whitish yellow, remainder of hind leg black; metasoma entirely black. Distribution. China (Jilin). Comparative diagnosis. This species is similar to C. maurotrochanter sp. nov., but differs from the latter by having area petiolaris weakly rugose, propodeal median area slightly depressed, fore wing areolet absent, mid leg largely brown, and metasoma from third tergite on not compressed. Etymology. Name derived from ���ex-��� (Latin for ���out of���) and ���areola��� (Latin for ���small open space���), because its fore wing is without areolet., Published as part of Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van & Chen, Xue-Xin, 2021, The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China, pp. 1-121 in Zootaxa 5066 (1) on pages 43-44, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5653939

Campoplex atricrus sp. nov. Figs. 15���16 Material examined. Holotype: female, Xinjiang, Hongjialike, 10.VII.1992, He Junhua, No 914155 (ZJUH). Paratypes: 1 female, 3 males, Xinjiang, Hongjialike, 10.VII.1992, He Junhua, No 914128, 914125, 914142, 914126. Description. Female (Fig. 15) holotype. Body length 3.6 mm, fore wing length 3.1 mm. Head. Antenna with 25 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.2�� longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 16E) granulose. Clypeus (Fig. 16E) granulose, slightly convex, apical margin almost truncated, blunt. Malar space granulose, 0.7�� basal width of mandible. Mandible with a very weak lamella, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 16F) 1.2�� ocello-ocular distance and 1.8�� distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, subpolished, slightly swollen behind eyes. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina above mandible base. Mesosoma. Pronotum rugulose-punctate dorsally, subpolished, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 16G) granulose, notauli absent. Scutellum granulose and rugose posteriorly. Metanotum granulose. Mesopleuron (Fig. 16B) rugose-punctate dorsally, granulose-punctate ventrally, trans-striate below tegula, speculum rugose. Metapleuron (Fig. 16B) granulose. Propodeum (Fig. 16C) with area basalis trapezoid; area superomedia granulose, mat; area petiolaris trans-striate; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, not depressed; all carina distinctly developed; propodeal spiracle small and round. Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 16A) areolet present and with a short stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 1.8�� longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (70��). Hind wing with nervellus vertical, intercepted at lower 0.3. Legs. Hind femur 4.5�� longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.57�� as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws slightly pectinate basally, its teeth weak. Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 16H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove present. First tergite 2.2�� longer than width of postpetiole. Postpetiole and second tergite granulose, mat. Second tergite 0.8�� as long as first tergite, equal to its apical width; thyridium round, its distance from basal margin of tergite equal to its diameter. Third tergite 0.7�� as long as its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.0�� longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 16D) gradually upcurved. Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth yellowish brown; palpi brown; tegula yellowish brown; scape and pedicel black; fore leg yellowish brown except coxa, trochanter, femur basal-ventrally and telotarsus blackish brown; mid leg black except trochantellus and tibia medially yellowish brown; hind leg black except trochantellus apically, femur extreme basally and tibia medially yellowish brown; metasoma entirely black. Variation. Pronotum granulose to rugulose-punctate, mesopleuron granulose-punctate to rugose-punctate, propodeal area petiolaris rugose to trans-striate, lateral carina present or absent. Male. Propodeal area superomedia narrow, area superomedia rugulose; otherwise similar to female. Distribution. China (Xinjiang). Comparative diagnosis. This species is similar to C. granulosus sp. nov., but differs from the latter by having apical margin of clypeus slightly arched, malar space 0.7�� basal width of mandible base, pronotum rugulosepunctate dorsally, mesopleuron rugose-punctate dorsally, mid leg and hind leg largely black, and metasoma entirely black. Etymology. Name derived from ���atrum��� (Latin for ���black���) and ���crus��� (Latin for ���leg���), because its mid and hind legs are largely black., Published as part of Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van & Chen, Xue-Xin, 2021, The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China, pp. 1-121 in Zootaxa 5066 (1) on pages 28-29, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5653939

Campoplex proportionis sp. nov. Figs. 61���62 Material examined. Holotype: female, Fujian, Fuzhou, 11.IV.1991, Liu Changming, No966415 (ZJUH). Description. Female (Fig. 61) holotype. Body length 6.8 mm, fore wing length 4.8 mm. Head. Antenna with at least 16 flagellomeres (apical segments missing); first flagellomere equal to the length of second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 62E) granulose-punctate medially, punctate around. Clypeus (Fig. 62E) punctate, slightly convex, apical margin arched. Malar space shallowly punctate, 0.5�� basal width of mandible. Mandible with lamella basally, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons rugose-punctate, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 62F) 1.5�� ocello-ocular distance and 1.7�� distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple nearly smooth, subpolished. Occipital carina narrowly curved dorsally, reaching hypostomal carina above mandible base. Mesosoma. Pronotum punctate dorsally, subpolished, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 62G) granulose punctate, becoming rugose in notaulic region. Scutellum with sparse and minute punctures. Metanotum shallowly punctate. Mesopleuron (Fig. 62B) punctate, trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Metapleuron (Fig. 62B) punctate, rugose on the region before hind coxa. Propodeum (Fig. 62C) with area basalis triangular, long and narrow; area superomedia granulose, polished; area petiolaris trans-striate; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, not depressed; all carina distinctly developed; propodeal spiracle small and round. Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 62A) areolet present and with a short stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 2.0�� longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (50��). Hind wing with nervellus inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.3 of its length. Legs. Hind femur 4.1�� longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.4�� as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate. Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 62H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, with weak dorso-lateral carina basally, and with a shallow groove. First tergite 3.0�� longer than width of postpetiole. Postpetiole and second tergite granulose, mat. Second tergite 0.7�� as long as first tergite, 1.25�� longer than its apical width; thyridium round, its distance from basal margin of tergite 2.0�� its diameter. Third tergite equal to its apical width. Metasoma compressed from third segment on. Sixth and seventh tergites with weak emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 2.0�� longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 62D) gradually upcurved. Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth, palpi, fore and middle legs entirely and tegula, yellow with telotarsus brownish; scape and pedicel yellowish brown anteriorly and brown dorsally; hind coxa black, trochanter except basally, femur and tibia yellowish brown, tibia infuscated subbasally and apically, tarsus blackish brown; metasoma entirely black. Distribution. China (Fujian). Comparative diagnosis. This new species is similar to C. bazariae Sheng, 2014, but differs from the latter by having face granulose-punctate medially and mat, clypeus mat, first flagellomere equal to the length of second flagellomere, notauli present and rugose, scutellum sparsely punctate, vein 1cu-a opposite M&RS, area superomedia granulose, first metasomal tergite with weak dorso-lateral carina and a shallow groove, sixth and seventh metasomal tergites without median emarginations, fore and mid coxae yellow, and mid and hind femur entirely yellowish brown. Etymology. Name derived from ���proportionis��� (Latin for ���relative equality���), because the length of the first flagellomere is equal to that of the second flagellomere., Published as part of Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van & Chen, Xue-Xin, 2021, The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China, pp. 1-121 in Zootaxa 5066 (1) on pages 89-91, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5653939

Campoplex assosae Kittel, 2016 Figs. 71���72 Campoplex pusillus Gupta & Maheshwary, 1977: 71���72. (preoccupied by Campoplex pusillus Ratzeburg, 1852) Campoplex assosae Kittel, 2016: 163���164. New name for Campoplex pusillus Gupta & Maheshwary, 1977 Material examined. 1 female, Guangdong, Conghua Liuxihe, 13.IV.2002, Xu Zaifu, No 20026943; 1 female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 18. VI.1983, Ma Yun, No 831261; 1 female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 2.IX.1987, Fan Jinjiang, No 875704; 1 female, 1 male, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, 21.VII.1987, Chen Xuexin, No 877351, 872444. Distribution. China (Guangdong, Taiwan, Zhejiang). Notes. This species is known as Campoplex pusillus Gupta & Maheshwary, 1977, but this name is a junior homonym of Campoplex pusillus Ratzeburg, 1852. Therefore, it was renamed as C. assosae Kittel, 2016., Published as part of Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van & Chen, Xue-Xin, 2021, The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China, pp. 1-121 in Zootaxa 5066 (1) on pages 101-103, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5653939, {"references":["Gupta, V. K. & Maheshwary, S. (1977) Ichneumonologia Orientalis, Part IV. The tribe Porizontini (= Campoplegini) (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Oriental Insects Monograph, 5, 1 - 267."]}

Campoplex xizangensis sp. nov. Figs. 81–82 Material examined. Holotype: female, Xizang, Yangzhuoyongchuo, 15.VII.2015, 3048m, N29.79°, E93.91°, 15.VII.2015, Liu Zhen, No201409026 (ZJUH). Description. Female (Fig. 81) holotype. Body length 9.0 mm, fore wing length 6.2 mm. Head. Antenna with at least 30 flagellomeres (apical segments missing); first flagellomere 1.3× longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 82E) rugose-punctate. Clypeus (Fig. 82E) rugose-punctate, slightly convex, apical margin arched, blunt. Malar space nearly smooth, 0.5× basal width of mandible. Mandible with lamella, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons rugose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 82F) 1.3× ocello-ocular distance and 1.7× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, subpolished, not swollen behind eyes. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina at mandible base. Mesosoma. Pronotum rugulose-punctate dorsally, mat, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 82G) granulosepunctate, becoming rugose in notaulic region. Scutellum granulose-punctate anteriorly, rugose posteriorly. Metanotum rugose. Mesopleuron (Fig. 82B) punctate, trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny, rugose above mesopleural fovea. Metapleuron (Fig. 82B) rugose-punctate. Propodeum (Fig. 82C) with area basalis trapezoid; area superomedia rugulose, subpolished; area petiolaris trans-striate; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, with a moderately groove medially; all carinae developed; propodeal spiracle small and oval. Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 82A) areolet present and with a short stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 2.0× longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a slightly distad of M&RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (60°). Hind wing with nervellus inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.1. Legs. Hind femur 5.0× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.55× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate. Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 82H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove present. First tergite 2.8× longer than width of postpetiole. Second tergite 0.75× as long as first tergite, 1.3× longer than its apical width; thyridium oval, its distance from basal margin of tergite 2.0× its length. Third tergite 1.4× longer than its width. Metasoma from third tergite on strongly compressed. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 2.2× longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 82D) gradually upcurved. Colour. Black. Mandible medially yellowish brown; scape and pedicel blackish brown; tegula yellowish brown; fore leg entirely yellowish brown except coxa brown; mid leg yellowish brown except coxa and telotarsus brown; hind coxa black, trochanter, trochantellus, tibia basally and apically and tarsus blackish-brown, femur and tibia medially reddish brown; metasoma entirely black. Distribution. China (Xizang). Comparative diagnosis. This species runs in the key by Maheshwary & Gupta (1977) to C. homonae Gupta & Maheshwary, 1977, but differs from the latter by having face and clypeus rugose-punctate, pronotum rugulosepunctate dorsally, prepectal carina without a notch-like constriction, areolet relatively large and higher than stalk, and mandible yellowish brown medially. Etymology. Name derived from the name of type locality of species.

Campoplex maurotrochanter sp. nov. Figs. 47–48 Material examined. Holotype: 1 female, Shaanxi, Ningshan Xunyangzhen, 6.VI.1998, Ma Yun, No 982824 (ZJUH). Paratypes: 1 female, Gansu, Wenxian Dianba, 16. VI. 1998, 900m, Ma Yun, No 982279; 1 female, Hebei, Zhangbei, 1981, Dai Junrong, No 820163; 1 female, Shaanxi, Huoditang Huodigou, 5. VI.1998, 1900m, Ma Yun, No 982683; 1 female, 1 male, Shaanxi, Qingling, 10. VI.1998, 1800m, Ma Yun, No 983990, 983977; 1 female, Shaanxi, Zhashui Niubeiliang, 15.VIII.2003, Tan Jiangli, No 201306781. Description. Female (Fig. 47) holotype. Body length 4.3 mm, fore wing length 3.4 mm. Head. Antenna with 27 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.25× longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 48E) granulose. Clypeus (Fig. 48E) granulose, slightly convex, apical margin arched and blunt. Malar space granulose, 0.7× basal width of mandible. Mandible with a very weak lamella basally, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 48F) 1.3× ocelloocular distance and 1.8× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, subpolished, not swollen behind eyes. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina above mandible base. Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose dorsally, subpolished, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 48G) granulose, notauli indistinct. Scutellum granulose with sparse and minute punctures. Metanotum granulose-punctate. Mesopleuron (Fig. 48B) granulose-punctate, weakly trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Metapleuron (Fig. 48B) granulose-punctate. Propodeum (Fig. 48C) with area basalis triangular, long and narrow; area superomedia finely granulose, subpolished; area petiolaris coarsely rugose; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, not depressed; all carina distinctly developed; propodeal spiracle small and round. Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 48A) areolet present and with a short stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 2.0× longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (70°). Hind wing with nervellus inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.3. Legs. Hind femur 5.0× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.5× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws nearly not pectinate, teeth very weak. Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 48H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, without dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove. First tergite 3.0× longer than width of postpetiole. Second tergite 0.7× as long as first tergite, 1.2× longer than its apical width; thyridium round, its distance from basal margin of tergite 1.5× its diameter. Third tergite 0.9× as long as its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.4× longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 48D) gradually upcurved. Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth, palpi, yellowish brown; scape and pedicel blackish brown; tegula whitish; all trochantellus yellow; fore leg from trochantellus on yellowish brown, coxa, trochanter and apical tarsus blackish brown; mid leg with coxa, trochanter and femur ventrally blackish brown, femur dorsally and tibia medially yellowish brown, tibia basally and apically and tarsus brown; hind coxa, trochanter, and femur black, tibia yellowish brown medially, tibia basally and apically, and tarsus brown; metasoma entirely black. Variation. Hind wing with nervellus intercepted at lower 0.3 or only slightly below middle; the specimen from Hebei province with metasoma from third tergite on not compressed. Male. The surface of body shinier than in female; propodeal carina stronger than in female; otherwise quite similar to female. Distribution. China (Gansu, Hebei, Shaanxi). Comparative diagnosis. This species runs in the key by Maheshwary & Gupta (1977) to C. kalatopensis Gupta & Maheshwary, 1977, but differs from the latter by having malar space 0.5× basal width of mandible, mesopleuron granulose-punctate and with punctures dense, area petiolaris coarsely rugose, and fore and mid trochanters blackish brown. Etymology. Name derived from “mauros” (Latin for “dark”) and “trochanter” (Latin for “trochanter”), because all its trochanters are black.

Campoplex monochroma sp. nov. Figs. 51���52 Material examined. Holotype: female, Zhejiang, Lishui Fengyangshan, 9.VIII.2003, Wu Qiong, No 20042321 (ZJUH). Paratypes: 1 female, Guangdong, Shixing Chebaling, 25. V.2002, Xu Zaifu, No 201806185; 3 females, Henan, Neixiang Wangoulinchang, 11.VII. 1998, Chen Xuexin, No 985939; 1 female, Jilin, Fusong Donggangzhen, 30.VIII.1989, Li Lin, No 974169; 1 female, Neimeng, Gegentala, 16.VIII.2000, Ma Yun, No 200100852; 1 female, Shaanxi, Hanzhong Liubaxian, 20.VIII.2013, Tu Binbin, No 201309161; 3 females, Shenyang National Forest Park, 16. VII.2011, Yan Chenjin, No 201103694, 201103690, 201103695; 3 females, Zhejiang, Longquan Fengyangshan, 10.VIII.2003, Liu Jingxian, No 201804841, 201805167, 201804175; 2 females, Zhejiang, Longquan Fengyangshan, 22.VIII.1982, Song Qisheng, No 826561, 826560; 1 female, Zhejiang, Longquan Fengyangshan, 16.VIII.1982, Le Yanhua, No 826757; 1 female, Zhejiang, Qingyuan Baishanzu, 30.VII.1993, Wu Hong, No 945170; 1 female, Zhejiang, Suichang Jiulongshan, 18.VII.1994, Xu Zaifu, No 944491; 4 females, Zhejiang, Songyang, 17.VII.1994, Xu Zaifu, No 944382, 943976, 944195, 944197. Description. Female (Fig. 51) holotype. Body length 6.2 mm, fore wing length 4.3 mm. Head. Antenna with at least 34 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.15�� longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 52E) granulose-punctate. Clypeus (Fig. 52E) punctate, punctures larger than that on face, slightly convex, apical margin arched, thick medially. Malar space granulose, 0.5�� basal width of mandible. Mandible with lamella basally, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 52F) 1.5�� ocello-ocular distance and 1.9�� distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, subpolished. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina above mandible base. Mesosoma. Pronotum punctate dorsally, subpolished, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 52G) granulose punctate, becoming rugose in notaulic region anteriorly. Scutellum with sparse and minute punctures, rugose posteriorly. Metanotum rugose-punctate. Mesopleuron (Fig. 52B) punctate, trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Metapleuron (Fig. 52B) punctate. Propodeum (Fig. 52C) with area basalis triangular, long and narrow; area superomedia granulose medially and short rugose laterally, polished; area petiolaris trans-striate; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, slightly depressed; all carina distinctly developed; propodeal spiracle small and oval. Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 52A) areolet present and with a moderate stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 2.0�� longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (65��). Hind wing with nervellus inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.3 of its length. Legs. Hind femur 4.0�� longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.5�� as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate. Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 52H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, with weak dorso-lateral carina, and with a shallow groove. First tergite 2.5�� longer than width of postpetiole. Postpetiole and second tergite granulose, mat. Second tergite 0.6�� as long as first tergite, 0.85�� its apical width; thyridium round, its distance from basal margin of tergite equal to its diameter. Third tergite 0.8�� as long as its apical width. Metasoma not compressed apically. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.7�� longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 52D) gradually upcurved. Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth, palpi, fore and middle legs entirely and tegula, yellow with telotarsus brownish; scape and pedicel yellowish brown anteriorly and brown dorsally; hind coxa black, trochanter except basally, femur and tibia yellowish brown, tibia unicolorous, slightly infuscated apically, tarsus brown; metasoma entirely black with second and third segments slightly blackish brown. Variation. First flagellomere 1.1���1.25�� second flagellomere; face granulose to granulose-punctate; frons with median carina absent or present; pronotum granulose-punctate to punctate dorsally; specimens from Shenyang province with ovipositor thinner; scape and pedicel entirely brown or yellowish-brown anteriorly; specimens from Henan province with hind tibia banded. Distribution. China (Guangdong, Henan, Jinlin, Neimeng, Shaanxi, Shenyang, Zhejiang). Comparative diagnosis. This new species is similar to C. proportionis sp. nov., but differs from the latter by having second tergite 0.8���0.9�� as long as its apical width, thyridium separated from the basal margin of tergite by its diameter, metasoma not compressed apically, malar space and frons granulose, and metanotum rugose-punctate. Etymology. Name derived from ���mono-��� (Greek for ���single���), and ���chroma��� (Greek for ���colour���), because its hind tibia is unicolorous., Published as part of Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van & Chen, Xue-Xin, 2021, The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China, pp. 1-121 in Zootaxa 5066 (1) on pages 74-77, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5653939

Campoplex hei sp. nov. Figs. 39���40 Material examined. Holotype: female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan Xianrending, 1.VII.2001, 1520m, Piao Meihua, No 200105708 (ZJUH). Paratypes: 1 female, Fujian, Chongan Sangang, 5.XII.1989, Wang Jiashe, No 20008409; 1 female, Fujian, Sangang, 9.IV.1981, Wang Jiashe, No 854190; 1 female, 3 males, Guangdong, Dawuling, 3.X.2001, Xu Zaifu, No 20020470, 20020548, 20020478, 20020944; 15 females, 2 males, Guizhou, Fanjinshan Jinding, 12.VII.1993, Chen Xuexin, No 938313, 938830, 938139, 938683, 938665, 938684, 939315, 939340, 939328, 939330, 938319, 938803, 939342, 939341, 939345; 4 females, 2 males, Guizhou, Fanjinshan Huixiangpin, 13.VII.1993, Xu Zaifu, No 938254, 936290, 935870, 935855, 936038, 936286; 1 female, Guizhou, Fanjinshan Huixiangpin, 11.VII.1993, Yao Songlin, No 937220; 3 females, 1 male, Guizhou, Fanjinshan Huguosi, 1.VIII.2001, 1300m, Piao Meihua, No 200107681, 200108977, 200108787, 200108241; 1 female, Guizhou, Xishui Changqiangou, 29.IX.2000, Ma Yun, No 200102761; 1 female, Henan, Luanchuan Longyuwan, 13.VII.1996, Cai Pin, No 974761; 1 female, Henan, Ludai Honghe, 27. V.2000, Cai Ping, No 200101753; 1 female, Henan, Neixiangbao Tianman, 15.VII.1998, Chen Xuexin, No 988826; 1 female, Henan, Songxian Baiyunshan, 11���18.VII.1996, Cai Pin, No 972765; 1 female, Hubei, Shennongjia Muyuzhen, 26.VII.2012, Liu Zhen, No 201206503; 1 female, Shaanxi, Liubaxian Shibandian, 19.VIII.2013, Tu Binbin, No 201310432; 1 female, Shaanxi, Qinling Niubeiliang, 11.VIII.2013, Tu Binbin, No 201305740; 1 female, Shaanxi, Zhouzhi, 26.VIII.2013, Tu Binbin, No 201309500, 201309495, 201309565; 1 female, Shandong, Junan, 8.VII.1987, Dong Yancai, No 875415; 1 female, Shanxi, Lishan Xiachuan, 26.VII.2012, Liu Zhen, No 201206503; 1 female, Shanxi, Lishan Xiachuan, 26.VII.2012, Liu Zhen, No 201206503; 1 female, 1 male, Sichuan, Daofu Luhuo, 5.VIII.2013, Liu Zhen, No 201407160, 201407149; 1 female, Sichuan, Qingchengshan, 3.VIII.1980, He Junhua, No 802795; 1 female, Sichuan, Wolong Dengshenggou, 9.VIII.2013, Liu Zhen, No 201401452; 2 females, Sichuan, Wolong Yinchanggou, 7.VIII.2013, Liuzhen, No 201409360, 201409316; 4 females 1 male, Sichuan, Xiaojinxian, 9.VIII.2013, Liu Zhen, No 201404326, 201404310, 201404306, 201404287, 201404305; 2 females, Sichuan, Xichang, 17.VIII.1980, He Junhua, No 801820, 801830; 2 females, Xizang, Lasa, 15.VII.2013, Liu Zhen, No 201406125, 201406117; 1 female, Xizang, Linzhi Bayizhen, 3.IX.2002, Lin Naiquan, No 20033340; 1 female, Xizang, Linzhi, 21.VIII.2003, Deji Meiduo, No 20034366; 1 female, Xizang, Linzhi, 21.VIII.2003, Deji Meiduo, No 20034366; 4 females, Xizang, Xiayadong, 19.VII.2013, Liu Zhen, No 201400796, 201403484, 201400665, 201400086; 1 female, Xizang, Zhangmu, 27.VII.2013, Liu Zhen, No 201400348; 1 female, Xizang, Zhangmu, 27.VII.2013, Liu Zhen, No 201400348; 1 female, Yunnan, Kunming, 30.III.1981, He Junhua, No 811125; 1 female, Yunnan, Lijiang Wenbishan, 28. VI.2007, Sharkey, No 200804984; 1 female, Yunnan, Maguan, 6. VI.2018, Malaise trap, No 20180611; 1 female, Yunnan, Ruili Mengxiu, 2. V.1981, He Junhua, No 813124; 2 females, Yunnan, Xiaguan, 14. V.1981, He Junhua, No 810920, 810915; 1 female, Zhejiang, Anji Longwanshan, 11.IV.1999, Wu Hong, No 20001818; 1 male, Zhejiang, Hangzhou Yuhuangshan, 20.VII.2003, Wu Qiong, No 20057224; 1 female, Zhejiang, Kaihua Gutianshan, 18.VIII.2003, Yu Xiaoxia, No 20058661; 1 female, Zhejiang, Lishui Fengyangshan, 10.VIII.2003, Daiwu, No 20042897; 1 female, Zhejiang, Longquan Fengyangshan, 7.VIII.2003, No 20055739; 1 female, Zhejiang, Moganshan, 9.VIII.1984, Qian Mo, No 845807; 1 male, Zhejiang, Qingyuan Baishanzu, 13.IX.1993, Chen Hanlin, No 950037; 1 female, Zhejiang, Qingliangfeng, 21. V.2012, Yan Chengjin, No 201202502; 1 female, 1 male, Zhejiang, Qingyuan Baishanzu, 2.X.1993, Wu Hong, No 945628, 905659; 1 female, Zhejiang, Songyang, 15.VII.1989, He Junhua, No 894199; 15 females, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 25. VI.1984, Chen Xuexin, No 980615, 941824, 997265, 980053, 842593, 20038367, 877194, 872585, 873330, 872393, 872710, 872325, 872375, 872415, 872411; 5 females, 1 male, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 20.VII.1987, Lou Xiaoming, No 873712, 874330, 873844, 873794, 874293, 874286; 1 female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan Xianrending, 25.VII.2011, Song Shengnan, No 201101535; 1 female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan Xianrending, 30.VII.2003, Shi Min, No 20030634; 2 females, Zhejiang, Tianmushan Xianrending, 25.VII.2011, Liu Zhen, No 201101877, 201101346; 1 female, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan Xianrending, 29.VII.2003, Wu Qiong, No 20040044; 1 female, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan Xianrending, 2.VII.2000, Ma Yun, No 200103977; 1 male, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 12. VI.1993, Ma Yun, No 934410; 1 female, 1 male, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, No 882753, 882709; 3 females, Zhejiang, Tianmushan Xianrending, 1.VII.2001, 1520m, Piao Meihua, No 200105179, 200105697, 200105929; 1 male, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, 18. VI.1983, Shi Zuhua, No 830427; 4 females, 3 males, Zhejiang, Tianmushan Xianrending, VII.1998 ��� IV.1999, Zhao Mingshui, No 992423, 20057642, 994370, 998796, 995413, 994354, 200010647; 1 male, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 2.IX.1987, Fan Jinjiang, No 875634; 1 female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 2. VI.1990, He Junhua, No 905091; 1 female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 17. V.1988, Xu Weiliang, No 885597. Description. Female (Fig. 39) holotype. Body length 6.5 mm, fore wing length 5.0 mm. Head. Antenna with 29 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.2�� longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 40E) granulose. Clypeus (Fig. 40E) mat, slightly convex, apical margin slightly curved. Malar space granulose, 0.6�� basal width of mandible. Mandible with a very weak lamella. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 40F) 1.8�� ocello-ocular distance and 2.3�� distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple mat. Occipital carina evenly arched. Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose dorsally, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 40G), scutellum and metanotum granulose. Mesopleuron (Fig. 40B) granulose, trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Propodeum (Fig. 40C) granulose; area basalis trapezoid; area superomedia granulose; area petiolaris trans-striate; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, not depressed medially; all carina strong with median carina under costulae weakly developed; propodeal spiracle small and oval. Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 40A) areolet present and with a short stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 2.0�� longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (70��). Hind wing with nervellus intercepted at lower 0.15 of its length. Legs. Hind femur 4.9�� longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.5�� as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate. Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 40H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, with dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove. Postpetiole and second tergite granulose. Second tergite 0.62�� as long as first tergite, as long as its apical width; thyridium round, its distance from basal margin of tergite equal to its diameter. Third tergite 0.6�� as long as its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.4�� longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 40D) gradually upcurved. Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth, palpi and tegula, extreme apex of fore and mid coxae, fore and mid trochanters, yellow; scape and pedicel blackish-brown; fore and mid coxae below, hind coxa and hind trochanter blackish-brown; remainder of fore and mid legs yellowish brown with telotarsus infuscated; remainder of hind leg yellowish brown with apex of hind tibia infuscated and tarsus from first tarsomere 0.8, brownish; metasoma entirely black. Variation. Malar space 0.5���0.8�� basal width of mandible; interocellar distance 0.8���1.8�� ocello-ocular distance; propodeal carina with medio-longitudinal carina under costula sometimes indistinct to absent; lateral longitudinal carina weak to strong; areolet with stalk short to long; hind femur yellowish brown to black; subbase of hind tibia not infuscated to infuscated. Distribution. China (Fujian, Guangdong, Guizhou, Henan, Hubei, Shaanxi, Shandong, Shanxi, Sichuan, Xizang, Yunnan, Zhejiang). Comparative diagnosis. This species is similar to C. concretus sp. nov., but differs from the latter by having pronotum granulose dorsally, metanotum granulose, propodeal carinae not strongly developed, thyridium separated from basal margin of tergite by its diameter, and metasoma entirely black. Etymology. Named in honour of Prof. Jun-hua He for his great contribution to the knowledge of Chinese Hymenoptera., Published as part of Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van & Chen, Xue-Xin, 2021, The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China, pp. 1-121 in Zootaxa 5066 (1) on pages 58-60, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5653939

Campoplex artivultus sp. nov. Figs. 13–14 Material examined. Holotype: female, Guizhou, Daozhen Dashahe, 18.VIII.2001, Wu Qiong, No 201505125 (ZJUH). Paratypes: 2 females, Sichuan, Emeishan, 11.VIII.1980, He Junhua, No 802364, 802372; 1 female, Yunnan, Maguan Bazhaizhen, VI.2018, Malaise trap, No 201807023; 2 females, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 4.IX.1987, Chen Xuexin, No 877203, 877171; 2 females, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 2.IX.1987, Fan Jinjiang, No 875511, 875691; 1 female, Zhejiang Tianmushan, 2.IX.1987, Wang Beigeng, No 876443; 1 female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 20.VII.1987, Lou Xiaoming, No 873835; 2 females, 2 males, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, 16.VIII.1998, Zhao Mingshui, No 994341, 994361, 994883, 20000928. Description. Female (Fig. 13) holotype. Body length 6.7 mm, fore wing length 4.5 mm. Head. Antenna with 34 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.3× longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 14E) granulose, weak laterally. Clypeus (Fig. 14E) granulose, slightly convex, apical margin blunt, almost truncated. Malar space shiny, 0.3× basal width of mandible. Mandible with a weak lamella, upper tooth longer than the length of lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 14F) 1.0× ocelloocular distance and 2.0× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, subpolished, not swollen behind eyes. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina at mandible base. Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose dorsally, mat, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 14G) granulose. Scutellum and metanotum granulose. Mesopleuron (Fig. 14B) granulose, trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny, rugose above mesopleural fovea. Metapleuron (Fig. 14B) granulose. Propodeum (Fig. 14C) with area basalis trapezoid; area superomedia granulose-rugulose, subpolished; area petiolaris trans-striate; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, slightly depressed; latero-longitudinal carina weakly developed; propodeal spiracle small and nearly round. Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 14A) areolet present and with a moderate stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 2.0× longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (70°). Hind wing with nervellus slightly inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.2. Legs. Hind femur 4.9× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.5× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate. Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 14H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove present. First tergite 3.7× longer than width of postpetiole. Second tergite 0.7× as long as first tergite, 1.8× longer than its apical width; thyridium oval, its distance from basal margin of tergite 2.0× its diameter. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 0.9× longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 14D) gradually upcurved. Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth and tegula yellowish brown; palpi yellow; scape and pedicel blackish brown; fore leg yellowish brown except coxa brown; mid leg with coxa, trochanter and trochantellus externally, basal 0.7 of femur and telotarsus blackish brown, remainder of mid leg yellowish brown; hind leg with extreme base of femur yellowish brown, tibia medially whitish yellow, remainder of hind leg black; metasoma entirely black. Variation. Antenna with 33–36 flagellomeres; interocellar distance 1.3–2.0× distance between median and lateral ocelli; fore wing areolet with stalk short to moderately long; ovipositor sheath approx. 0.9–1.2× longer than hind femur; mid femur entirely yellowish brown or black basally. Male. Essentially similar to female except propodeal carina stronger, mid leg whitish yellow except femur basal-ventrally and coxa brown. Distribution. China (Guizhou, Sichuan, Yunnan, Zhejiang). Comparative diagnosis. This species runs in the key by Maheshwary & Gupta (1977) to C. maximalus Gupta & Maheshwary, 1977, but differs from the latter by having malar space 0.3× basal width of mandible, medio-longitudinal carina moderately developed, areolet equal to the length of stalk, nervellus intercepted at lower 0.2, and first metasomal segment with a strong lateral carina. Etymology. Name derived from “artus” (Latin for “narrow”) and “vultus” (Latin for “face”), refer to its comparatively narrow face.

Campoplex protenus sp. nov. Figs. 63���64 Material examined. Holotype: female, Zhejiang, Lishui Fengyangshan, 10.VIII.2003, Daiwu, No 20042898 (ZJUH). Paratypes: 1 female, Guangdong, Nanling, 21���25.IV.2011, YTP; 1 female, Shaanxi, Foping, 27.VII.2013, Tan Jiangli, No 201303527; 1 female, Zhejiang, Kaihua Gutianshan, 18.VIII.2003, Yu Xiaoxia, No 20043899; 1 female, Zhejiang, Linan Tianmushan, 11. VI.1993, Chen Xuexin, No 935113; 1 female, Zhejiang, Linan Longtangshan, 29. V.2012, Tang Pu, No 201204899; 1 female, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, 19. V.1999, Zhao Mingshui, No 998479. Description. Female (Fig. 63) holotype. Body length 5.3 mm, fore wing length 3.7 mm. Head. Antenna with 32 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.05�� longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 64E) granulose. Clypeus (Fig. 64E) finely granulose, slightly convex, apical margin arched, blunt. Face and clypeus combined equal to minimum width of face. Malar space granulose, 0.6�� basal width of mandible. Mandible with a weak lamella, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 64F) 1.0�� ocello-ocular distance and 1.4�� distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, mat, not swollen behind eyes. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina at mandible base. Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose-punctate dorsally, mat, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 64G) granulose, rugulose-punctate on notaulic region. Scutellum and metanotum granulose. Mesopleuron (Fig. 64B) granulose, trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny, rugulose above mesopleural fovea. Metapleuron (Fig. 64B) granulose. Propodeum (Fig. 64C) with area basalis trapezoid; area superomedia area granulose; area petiolaris trans-striate; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, slightly depressed; medio-longitudinal carina very weakly developed under costula, strongly developed apically; latero-longitudinal carina strongly developed; propodeal spiracle small and round. Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 64A) areolet present and with a very short stalk, emitting 2m-cu vein from its basal part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 2.0�� longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (70��). Hind wing with nervellus inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.3. Legs. Hind femur 5.0�� longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.54�� as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate, its teeth weak. Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 64H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, with dorso-lateral carina and without lateral groove. First tergite 3.0�� longer than width of postpetiole. Postpetiole and second tergite granulose, finely granulose on subsequent tergites. Second tergite 0.75�� as long as first tergite, 1.5�� longer than its apical width; thyridium round, its distance from basal margin of tergite 2.3�� its diameter. Third tergite 0.9�� as long as its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.3�� longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 64D) gradually upcurved. Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth and tegula yellowish brown; palpi yellow; scape and pedicel brown; fore leg yellowish brown except coxa basally brown; mid leg yellowish brown except coxa basally and telotarsus brown; hind leg with coxa, trochanter, extreme apical of femur, tibia basally and apically, brown, remainder of hind leg yellowish brown; third and fourth metasomal tergites basal-laterally blackish brown, subsequent tergites laterally yellowish brown, remainder of metasoma black. Variation. Antenna with 29���32 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.05���1.2�� longer than second flagellomere; malar space 0.5���0.6�� basal width of mandible; interocellar distance 0.9���1.0�� ocello-ocular distance; hind wing with nervellus intercepted at lower 0.2���0.4; first tergite 2.8���3.1�� longer than width of postpetiole; thyridium separated from basal margin of tergite 1.8���2.3�� its diameter; ovipositor sheath 1.3���1.5�� longer than hind femur. Distribution. China (Guangdong, Shaanxi, Zhejiang). Comparative diagnosis. This species is similar to C. grandicella sp. nov., but differs from the latter by having first flagellomere 1.0���1.1�� longer than second flagellomere, rugulose-punctate on notaulic region, medio-longitudinal carina strong apically, latero-longitudinal carina strongly developed, fore wing areolet emitting 2m-cu vein from its basal part, and hind femur yellowish brown. Etymology. Name derived from ���protenus��� (Latin for ���before���), because its fore wing areolet is emitting 2m-cu vein from its basal part., Published as part of Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van & Chen, Xue-Xin, 2021, The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China, pp. 1-121 in Zootaxa 5066 (1) on pages 91-92, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5653939

Campoplex adustantennalis sp. nov. Figs. 5���6 Material examined. Holotype: female, Gansu, Zhenyuanxian, VII.1981, Cao Wei, No 815326 (ZJUH). Paratype: 1 female, Heilongjiang, Jingpohu, 26.VII.1995, Lou Juxian, No 962390. Description. Female (Fig. 5) holotype. Body length 6.6 mm, fore wing length 5.2 mm. Head. Antenna with 35 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.3�� longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 6D) granulose-punctate to punctate. Clypeus (Fig. 6D) punctate, slightly convex, apical margin arched. Malar space granulose-punctate, 0.7�� basal width of mandible. Mandible with a weak lamella, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons rugose-punctate, median carina absent. Vertex granulose-punctate. Interocellar distance (Fig. 6E) 1.7�� ocello-ocular distance and 1.8�� distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, mat. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina slightly at mandible base. Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose-punctate dorsally, subpolished, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 6F) granulose-punctate. Scutellum punctate and rugose posteriorly. Metanotum rugose-punctate. Mesopleuron (Fig. 6B) punctate, trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Metapleuron (Fig. 6B) punctate, punctures smaller than that on mesopleuron. Propodeum (Fig. 6C) with area basalis trapezoid; area superomedia granulose, with sparse punctures; area petiolaris rugulose-punctate; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, not depressed; all carina developed; propodeal spiracle small and oval. Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 6A) areolet present and with a short stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 1.9�� longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (60��). Hind wing with nervellus inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.4 of its length. Legs. Hind femur 4.0�� longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.5�� as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate. Metasoma. Mat. First metasomal segment (Fig. 6G) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove absent. First tergite 2.5�� longer than width of postpetiole. Second tergite 0.6�� as long as first tergite, 0.9�� its apical width; thyridium round, its distance from basal margin of tergite equal to its diameter. Third tergite 0.7�� as long as its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.1�� longer than hind femur, ovipositor gradually upcurved. Colour. Black. Mandible medially and palpi yellowish brown; antenna, scape and pedicel brown; tegula yellow; fore leg yellowish brown with coxa black and telotarsus brown; mid leg yellowish brown with coxa and telotarsus black, trochanter brown; hind leg with coxa and trochanter black, trochantellus basally, tibia subbasally and apically, tarsus except basal tarsomere 0.8 brown, remainder of hind leg yellowish brown; metasoma black except postpetiole apically, second tergite apically and third segment basal-laterally brown. Variation. Antenna with 35���39 flagellomeres; hind wing with nervellus intercepted at lower 0.2���0.4; second and third metasomal tergites yellowish brown. Distribution. China (Gansu, Heilongjiang). Comparative diagnosis. This species is similar to C. monochroma sp. nov., but differs from the latter by having malar space 0.7�� basal width of mandible, frons rugose-punctate, propodeal area petiolaris rugulose-punctate, first metasomal segment without dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove, ovipositor sheath approx. 1.1�� longer than hind femur, hind tibia subbasally and apically brown, second metasomal tergite apically, and third metasomal tergite basal-laterally brown. Etymology. Name derived from ���adustus��� (Latin for ���brown���) and ���antenna��� (Latin for ���antenna���), because of its antenna brown., Published as part of Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van & Chen, Xue-Xin, 2021, The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China, pp. 1-121 in Zootaxa 5066 (1) on pages 14-16, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5653939

Campoplex confluentus sp. nov. Figs. 21–22 Material examined. Holotype: female, Liaoning, Shenyang, VI–VII.1995, Lou Juxian, No 961003 (ZJUH). Paratype: female, Liaoning, Shenyang, VI–VII.1995, Lou Juxian, No961043. Description. Female (Fig. 21) holotype. Body length 5.1 mm, fore wing length 4.3 mm. Head. Antenna with at least 25 flagellomeres (apical segments missing); first flagellomere 1.25× longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 22E) granulose. Clypeus (Fig. 22E) granulose with sparse punctures, slightly convex, apical margin slightly arched. Malar space granulose, 0.55× basal width of mandible. Mandible without lamella, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 22F) 1.2× ocello-ocular distance and 1.5× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, mat. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina at mandible base. Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose with sparse punctures dorsally, mat, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 22G) granulose punctate. Scutellum granulose-punctate. Metanotum granulose. Mesopleuron (Fig. 22B) granulosepunctate, trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Metapleuron (Fig. 22B) granulose. Propodeum (Fig. 22C) granulose; area basalis confluent with area superomedia; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris; area petiolaris granulose-rugulose; all carina very weakly developed; propodeal spiracle small and oval. Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 22A) areolet absent. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 2.2× longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (65°). Hind wing with nervellus slightly inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.15. Legs. Hind femur 5.3× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.5× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate. Metasoma. Mat. First metasomal segment (Fig. 22H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove absent. First tergite 2.6× longer than width of postpetiole. Second tergite 0.75× as long as first tergite, 1.0× as long as its apical width; thyridium round, its distance from basal margin of tergite equal to its diameter. Third tergite 0.8× as long as its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.0× longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 22D) gradually upcurved. Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth, palpi and tegula, whitish yellow; scape and pedicel yellowish brown; fore and mid legs with coxa, trochanter and trochantellus whitish yellow, mid leg coxa basally weakly brown, remainder of fore and mid legs yellowish brown; hind leg coxa and trochanter black, trochantellus whitish-yellow, femur yellowish brown, tibia whitish yellow with apically infuscated, tarsus from basal 0.8 on brown, basal 0.8 yellowish brown; metasoma entirely black. Variation. Interocellar distance 1.2–1.5× distance between median and lateral ocelli; propodeal lateral carina absent to very weak; hind femur 5.3–5.7× longer than wide. Distribution. China (Liaoning). Comparative diagnosis. This species is similar to C. assosae Kittel, 2016, but differs from the latter by having interocellar distance 1.2× ocello-ocular distance, propodeal area basalis confluent with area superomedia, area petiolaris granulose-rugulose, hind wing with nervellus slightly inclivous, fore and mid legs coxa whitish yellow, and hind trochanter blackish brown. Etymology. Name derived from “confluus” (Latin for “confluent”), because its propodeal area basalis, area superomedia area and area petiolaris are confluent.

Campoplex longiclypeus sp. nov. Figs. 45–46 Material examined. Holotype: female, Xizang, Naqu Naixian, 31.VII.2013, Liu Zhen, No 201408822 (ZJUH). Description. Female (Fig. 45) holotype. Body length 5.5 mm, fore wing length 4.0 mm. Head. Antenna with 30 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.45× longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 46E) granulose. Clypeus (Fig. 46E) granulose, convex and long, apical margin arched, sharp. Malar space granulose, 0.9× basal width of mandible. Mandible without lamella, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 46F) 1.5× ocello-ocular distance and 1.7× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, subpolished, swollen behind eyes. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina above mandible base. Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose-punctate, mat, weakly trans-striate on extremely below. Mesoscutum granulose punctate. Scutellum and metanotum granulose. Mesopleuron (Fig. 46B) granulose-punctate, trans-striations below tegula short and weak, speculum smooth and shiny, mesopleural fovea absent. Metapleuron (Fig. 46B) granulose-punctate. Propodeum (Fig. 46C) granulose; area basalis trapezoid; area superomedia granulose; area petiolaris granulose-rugulose; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, not depressed; medio-longitudinal carina present below costulae and absent apically; lateral longitudinal carina absent; other carinae present; propodeal spiracle small and short oval. Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 46A) areolet present and with a long stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its middle. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 1.8× longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a slightly distad of M&RS. External angles of second discal cell vertical. Hind wing with nervellus intercepted slightly below middle. Legs. Hind femur 5.1× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.44× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate, teeth very weak. Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 46H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, without dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove. First tergite 2.8× longer than width of postpetiole. Postpetiole and second tergite granulose. Second tergite 0.85× as long as first tergite, 1.3× longer than its apical width; thyridium oval, its distance from basal margin of tergite about its length. Third tergite equal to its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites with emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 2.1× longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 46D) gradually upcurved. Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth yellow; palpi brown; tegula, scape and pedicel black; pterostigma whitish basally; fore coxa brown except extreme apically yellow, trochanter basally, trochantellus basally, femur ventrally, tibia dorsally and tarsus, blackish brown, remainder of fore leg yellow; mid trochantellus apically and femur extreme basally yellow, tibia medially brownish, remainder of mid leg blackish; hind leg with trochantellus apically, femur extreme basally and tibia dorso-medially brownish, remainder of hind leg black; metasoma entirely black. Distribution. China (Xizang). Comparative diagnosis. This species runs in the key by Maheshwary & Gupta (1977) to C. kalatopensis Gupta & Maheshwary, 1977, but differs from the latter by having clypeus long, mesopleuron granulose-punctate, mediolongitudinal carina absent underneath, lateral carina absent, area petiolaris granulose, the length of areolet shorter than its stalk, and body colour different. Etymology. Name derived from “longus” (Latin for “long”) and “clypeus” (Latin for “clypeus”), because its clypeus is long.

Campoplex concretus sp. nov. Figs. 19���20 Material examined. Holotype: female, Guizhou, Daozhen Dashahe, 18.VIII.2004, Wu Qiong, No 201505028 (ZJUH). Paratype: 1 male, Guizhou, Daozhen Dashahe, No 201503196. Description. Female (Fig. 19) holotype. Body length 5.7 mm, fore wing length 4.3 mm. Head. Antenna with 32 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.1�� length of second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 20E) granulose-punctate. Clypeus (Fig. 20E) sparsely punctate, polished, slightly convex, apical margin slightly curved. Malar space granulose, 0.6�� basal width of mandible. Mandible with a very weak lamella. Frons granulose-punctate, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 20F) 1.8�� ocello-ocular distance and 2.0�� distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, mat. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina before mandible base. Mesosoma. Pronotum punctate dorsally, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 20G) granulose-punctate, rugose on notaulic area anteriorly. Scutellum punctate, rugose posteriorly. Metanotum rugose-punctate. Mesopleuron (Fig. 20B) punctate, trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Propodeum (Fig. 20C) smooth and compact; area basalis trapezoid; area superomedia nearly smooth, shiny, with few small punctures; area petiolaris trans-striate; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, not depressed medially; all carina strongly developed; propodeal spiracle small and oval. Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 20A) areolet present and with a moderate stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 1.7�� longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a slightly distad of M&RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (70��). Hind wing with nervellus intercepted at lower 0.1 of its length. Legs. Hind femur 4.1�� longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.5�� as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws strongly pectinate. Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 20H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, with dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove very weak. Postpetiole and second tergite granulose, subpolished. Second tergite 0.6�� as long as first tergite, 0.8�� as long as its apical width; thyridium round, its distance from basal margin of tergite 1.5�� its diameter. Third tergite 0.55�� as long as its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.8�� longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 20D) gradually upcurved. Colour. Black. Mandible medially and palpi, yellowish brown; tegula yellow; scape and pedicel brown; fore and mid coxae and apical tarsal segments brown, remainder of fore and mid legs yellowish brown; hind leg coxa and trochanter blackish brown, tarsus brown, remainder of hind leg yellowish brown; metasoma black with second and third tergites somewhat blackish brown basally. Male. Essentially same as female. Distribution. China (Guizhou). Comparative diagnosis. This species is similar to C. hei sp. nov., but differs from the latter by having pronotum punctate dorsally, metanotum rugose-punctate, propodeal carina strongly developed, thyridium away from basal margin of tergite 1.5�� its diameter, and metasoma with second and third tergites somewhat blackish brown basally. Etymology. Name derived from ���concretus��� (Latin for ���thick���), because its propodeum is compact., Published as part of Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van & Chen, Xue-Xin, 2021, The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China, pp. 1-121 in Zootaxa 5066 (1) on pages 33-34, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5653939

Campoplex collucatus sp. nov. Figs. 17–18 Material examined. Holotype: female, Shaanxi, Qingling, 8.VI.1998, Ma Yun, No 983546 (ZJUH). Description. Female (Fig. 17) holotype. Body length 8.0 mm, fore wing length 5.1 mm. Head. Antenna with 33 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.15× longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 18E) granulose. Clypeus (Fig. 18E) finely granulose, slightly convex, apical margin almost truncated, blunt. Malar space granulose, 0.5× basal width of mandible. Mandible with lamella present basally, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 18F) 1.2× ocello-ocular distance and 2.0× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, subpolished, not swollen behind eyes. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina above mandible base. Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose, subpolished, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 18G) granulose, becoming rugose in notaulic area. Scutellum and metanotum granulose. Mesopleuron (Fig. 18B) granulose with small punctures, punctures denser in low half, trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny, rugose above mesopleural fovea. Metapleuron (Fig. 18B) granulose. Propodeum (Fig. 18C) granulose, with area basalis trapezoid; area superomedia granulose; area petiolaris granulose medially and rugose laterally; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, moderately depressed; medio-longitudinal carina weak under costula, gradually strong apically; latero-longitudinal carina absent; propodeal spiracle small and oval. Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 18A) areolet present and with a short stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its basal part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 2.1× longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite of M&RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (70°). Hind wing with nervellus slightly inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.1 of its length. Legs. Hind femur 5.5× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.5× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate. Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 18H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, with dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove present. First tergite 3.3× longer than width of postpetiole. Metasoma entirely granulose except petiole. Second tergite 0.7× as long as first tergite, 2.4× longer than its apical width; thyridium oval, its distance from basal margin of tergite 2.0× of its length. From third tergite on strongly compressed. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.3× longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 18D) gradually upcurved. Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth, scape and pedicel brown; palpi and tegula yellowish brown; fore and mid legs except coxae and telotarsus brown; hind leg coxa black, trochanter, extreme base of tibia and each tarsal segment apically brown, remainder of hind leg yellowish brown; metasoma from third tergites on laterally yellowish brown, remainder of metasoma black. Distribution. China (Shaanxi). Comparative diagnosis. This species is similar to C. multicinctus Gravenhorst, 1829, but differs from the latter by having fore wing areolet emitting 2m-cu vein from its basal part, first metasomal segment shorter than hind femur, third tergite 2.0× longer than its apical width, and mandible brown except teeth. Etymology. Name derived from “collucatus” (Latin for “thin”), because this species looks thin.

Campoplex medicarinatus sp. nov. Figs. 49���50 Material examined. Holotype: female, Guizhou, Guiyang, 15.X.1983, He Junhua, No834559 (ZJUH). Description. Female (Fig. 49) holotype. Body length 5.2 mm, fore wing length 4.4 mm. Head. Antenna with 30 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.4�� longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 50E) granulose-punctate. Clypeus (Fig. 50E) granulose-punctate, slightly convex, apical margin slightly arched, thick medially. Malar space granulose, 0.6�� basal width of mandible. Mandible without lamella, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina present. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 50F) 1.2�� ocello-ocular distance and 2.0�� distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, subpolished, not swollen behind eyes. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina slightly above mandible base. Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose-punctate dorsally, subpolished, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 50G) granulose punctate. Scutellum punctate and rugose posteriorly. Metanotum rugose-punctate. Mesopleuron (Fig. 50B) punctate, trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Metapleuron (Fig. 50B) granulose. Propodeum (Fig. 50C) granulose; area basalis triangular, long and narrow; area superomedia granulose; area petiolaris rugose; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, not depressed; all carina strongly developed; propodeal spiracle small and oval. Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 50A) areolet present and with a short stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 2.0�� longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a slightly distad of M&RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (70��). Hind wing with nervellus inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.15. Legs. Hind femur 5.0�� longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.5�� as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws with indistinct teeth basally. Metasoma. Mat. First metasomal segment (Fig. 50H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove weakly present. First tergite 2.7�� longer than width of postpetiole. Second tergite 0.6�� as long as first tergite, 0.8�� its apical width; thyridium round, its distance from basal margin of tergite equal to its diameter. Third tergite 0.6�� as long as its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath 1.5�� longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 50D) gradually upcurved. Colour. Black. Mandible medially and palpi yellowish brown; mandible basally black; tegula yellow; scape and pedicel blackish brown; fore and mid legs yellowish brown except coxa and telotarsus blackish; hind leg with coxa, trochanter and trochantellus basally blackish brown, tibia apically infuscated, tarsus from basal tarsomere 0.8 on brown, remainder of hind leg yellowish brown; metasoma black except second tergite laterally yellowish brown. Distribution. China (Guizhou). Comparative diagnosis. This species is similar to C. liuae sp. nov., but differs from the latter by having first flagellomere 1.4�� longer than second flagellomere, clypeus granulose-punctate, frons with median carina present, area petiolaris rugose, nervellus intercepted at lower 0.15, tarsal claws with indistinct teeth basally, and the colour of metasoma different. Etymology. Name derived from ���medius��� (Latin for ���middle���) and ���carina��� (Latin for ���carina���), because its frons has a median carina., Published as part of Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van & Chen, Xue-Xin, 2021, The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China, pp. 1-121 in Zootaxa 5066 (1) on pages 72-74, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5653939

Campoplex plicopunctatus sp. nov. Figs. 65���66 Material examined. Holotype: female, Fujian, Wuyishan, 14.VII.1994, Xu Zaifu, No 943159 (ZJUH). Paratypes: 1 female, Heilongjiang, Jingpohu, 26.VIII.1995, Lou Juxian, No 962393; 1 female, Jilin, Liaoyuan, 10.VIII.1990, Lou Juxian, No 977327; 1 female, Liaoning, Fuxin, 6.VIII.1995, Lou Juxian, No 961577; 1 female, Xinjiang, Bayin Buluke, 10.VII.1991, He Junhua, No 914390; 2 females, Xinjiang, Wulumuqi, 23.VII.1991, He Junhua, No 916157, 914746; 2 females, Xinjiang, Wulumuqi, 29.VIII.1987, Ma Qi, No 880076, 880101. Description. Female (Fig. 65) holotype. Body length 9.0 mm, fore wing length 5.5 mm. Head. Antenna with 44 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.4�� longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 66E) rugose-punctate, weak laterally. Clypeus (Fig. 66E) punctate, truncated apically. Malar space granulose, 0.45�� basal width of mandible. Mandible without lamella, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 66F) 2.0�� ocello-ocular distance and 2.0�� distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, mat, not swollen behind eyes. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina above mandible base. Mesosoma. Pronotum rugose-punctate dorsally, subpolished, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 66G) granulose-punctate. Scutellum punctate, becoming rugose posteriorly. Metanotum rugose-punctate. Mesopleuron (Fig. 66B) punctate, trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Metapleuron (Fig. 66B) punctate, punctures denser than that on mesopleuron. Propodeum (Fig. 66C) with area basalis triangular; area superomedia trans-striate, subpolished; area petiolaris trans-striate; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, not depressed; all carina distinctly developed; propodeal spiracle small and oval. Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 66A) areolet present and with a short stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 1.9�� longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a slightly distad of M&RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (70��). Hind wing with nervellus inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.3. Legs. Hind femur 5.0�� longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.6�� as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate. Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 66H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, without dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove. First tergite 3.2�� longer than width of postpetiole. Second tergite 0.75�� as long as first tergite, 1.6�� longer than its apical width; thyridium round, its distance from basal margin of tergite 3.0�� its diameter. Third tergite 1.2�� longer than its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites with emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.8�� longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 66D) gradually upcurved. Colour. Black. Mandible medially, palpi, tegula and scape in front yellowish brown; pedicel, mandible basally and back of scape brown; fore and mid legs yellowish brown except coxae black; hind leg with coxa black, trochanter brown, tibia apically infuscated, tarsus brown, remainder of hind leg yellowish brown; metasoma entirely black except second tergite dorso-apically reddish brown. Variation. Frons with median carina absent or present; propodeal area basalis triangular to trapezoid; area superomedia rugose to trans-striate; lateral carina weak to strong; hind femur 4.5���5.0�� longer than wide; metasoma second tergite 1.3���1.6�� longer than its apical width. Distribution. China (Fujian, Heilongjiang, Jilin, Liaoning, Xinjiang). Comparative diagnosis. This species runs in the key by Maheshwary & Gupta (1977) to C. indicus Gupta & Maheshwary, 1977, but differs from the latter by face rugose-punctate, frons and ocellar area granulose, pronotum rugose-punctate dorsally, mesoscutum granulose-punctate, scutellum punctate, metapleuron not rugose in juxtacoxal region, nervellus inclivous, and mandible yellowish brown medially. Etymology. Name derived from ���plicatus��� (Latin for ���fold���) and ���punctum��� (Latin for ���dot���), because its face is rugose-punctate., Published as part of Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van & Chen, Xue-Xin, 2021, The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China, pp. 1-121 in Zootaxa 5066 (1) on pages 94-96, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5653939, {"references":["Gupta, V. K. & Maheshwary, S. (1977) Ichneumonologia Orientalis, Part IV. The tribe Porizontini (= Campoplegini) (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Oriental Insects Monograph, 5, 1 - 267."]}

Campoplex angustaulacis sp. nov. Figs. 9–10 Material examined. Holotype: female, Shandong, Wendeng, XI.1985 – VI.1988, Hou Shaojin, No 863867 (ZJUH). Paratypes: 1 female, Anhui, Yuexi, 15.X.1981, Yang Fan, No 820649; 1 female, Fujian, Dehua Chishuizhen, 13.IX.2002, 1000m, Xu Zaifu, No 20025087; 1 female, Fujian, Dehua Daiyunshan, 15.IX.2002, 1000m, Li Fangfang, No 20025314; 1 female, Fujian, Meihuashan, 23–24.VII.1988, He Junhua, No 887364; 1 female, Fujian, Sangang, 7.X.1991, Chen Xuexin, No 920016; 1 female, Fujian, Sangang, 8.X.1985, Wang Jiashe, No 854451; 1 female, Fujian, Wuyishan Tongmu, 2–8.VIII.1983, He Junhua, No 832436; 1 female, Fujian, Wuyishan, 22.VII.1986, Wang Jiashe, No 870790; 1 female, Fujian, Shenzhou, X.1989, Wu Zhishan, No 20009631; 1 female, Fujian, Wuyishan, 18.IV.2009, Zeng Jie, No 201605335; 2 females, Guangxi, Jingang Dayaoshan, 14. VI.1982, He Junhua, No 822880, 823038; 1 female, Guangxi, Lipu, 17. VI.1982, He Junhua, No 823117; 2 females, Guangxi, Tianlin Langpin, 28. V.1982, No 821775, 822020; 1 female, Guizhou, Dashahe, 1615– 1356m, 18.VIII.2004, Wei Shujun, No 201501902; 24 females, Guizhou, Duyun, V.1985, Liu Zhibang, No 850929, 850928, 850927, 850941, 850925, 850926, 850952, 850953, 850956, 850931, 850933, 850935, 850948, 850930, 850959, 850951, 850924, 850853, 850905, 850923, 850922, 850921, 850419, 850915, 861288, 861280, 861285, 861286; 1 female, Guizhou, Guiyang, 1. V.1981, Luo Qinghuai, No 814280; 1 female, Guizhou, Guiyang, 2. V.1983, Luo Qinghuai, No 850293; 1 female, Guizhou, Guiyang, 30.VIII.1987, He Junhua, No 878146; 2 females, Guizhou, Guiyang, VI.1982, Song Xuepei, No 834951; 3 females, Guizhou, Huishui, IX–X.1986, Chu Jiming, No 864493; 3 females, Guizhou, Meitan, V.1982, Xia Huaien, No 860685, 860686, 860687; 1 female, Hebei, Handan, VI.1978, Ma Zhongshi, No 790599; 1 female, Heilongjiang, 20. V.1979, Zhang Runsheng, Host: Laspeyresia zebeana, Zhang Runsheng, No 810375; 7 females, Heilongjiang, Heihe, Wan Li, No 810343 (7); 1 female, Jilin, Changchun, 4.IX.1985, Yan Hui, No 861283; 2 females, Jilin, Changchun, 25.VII.1985, Li Zhaofen, No 861279, 861292; 1 female, Jilin, Jiutai, 19. VI.1980, Liu Xiaoyu, No 861293; 1 female, Jilin, Jinyue, 11.X.1985, Li Zhaofen, No 861287; 1 female, Jilin, Songhuahu, IX–X.1985, Tang Minghe, No 860014; 1 female, Jiangsu, Sushui, 8.IV.1984, Qian Fanjun, Host: Dendrolimus sp., No 853210; 1 female, Jiangxi, Jiujiang, 17.III.1981, Peng Guohuang, No 810359; 1 female, Jiangxi, Lushan, 10–12.VIII.1982, He Junhua, No 825210; 2 females, Liaoning, Tieceng, 1.IX.1974, Host: Dendrolimus sp., Zhou Jiazhi, No 772210, 791154; 125 females, Shandong, Wendeng, XI.1985 – VI.1988, Hou Shaojin, No 862063, 863864, 864705, 863873, 863874, 862080, 863870, 863871, 863872, 863885, 863882, 863881, 863880, 862079, 862076, 862073, 861757, 862064, 862081, 861758, 862072, 861760, 861756, 861755, 886952, 861759, 862071, 862070, 862069, 862068, 862067, 862065, 888743, 888742, 886954, 886918, 888724, 888727, 875001, 875006, 874989, 874990, 861764, 861996, 888718, 881440, 878931, 875005, 861763, 875019, 888960, 888947, 875000, 875008, 875013, 878926, 878927, 878929, 878932, 878933, 878934, 878936, 878937, 874997, 874998, 874999, 854178, 853624, 853625, 864626, 864689, 864687, 853629, 864686, 864715, 864713, 864706, 864701, 864690, 864712, 864711, 864710, 864709, 864702, 863888, 864887, 864703, 864685, 878914, 863866, 863868, 863869, 878921, 878920, 878938, 878924, 878940, 878939, 863865, 878925, 863878, 888749, 863877, 863889, 864718, 864719, 864722, 863875, 863876, 864720, 864720, 864921,8889494, 881444, 863879, 888752, 888740, 888730, 881443, 881442, 881441, 881434, 881433, 881424, 881423, 881426; 1 female, Shandong, Wendeng, 26. VI.1988, Wang Liwen, No 886933; 2 females, Shandong, Wendeng, 1.VII.1988, Hou Xinpin, No 886927, 886944; 10 females, Shandong, Yantai, 1987, Hou Shaojin, No 871518, 871314, 871313, 871311, 871309, 871304, 871295, 871303, 871294, 871312; 1 female, Sichuan, Chengdu, 1979, He Rongrong, No 810623; 1 female, Sichuan, Rongjing, 1980, Xie Daben, No 813568; 2 females, Zhejiang, Deqing Fatou, 27. V.1995, He Junhua, No 954304, 954305; 1 female, Zhejiang, Fengyangshan, 26.VII.2007, Liu Jingxian, No 201891370; 1 female, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, 9.VII.1982, Xu Houliang, No 923169; 1 female, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, VII.1986, He Junhua, No 862020; 1 female, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, 28. VI.1989, He Junhua, No 893608; 1 female, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, IV.1990, Rong Luqi, No 900078; 1 female, Zhejiang, Lishui Fengyangshan, 9.VIII.2003, Wu Qiong, No 20042298; 1 female, Zhejiang, Putuoshan, 4. VI.1975, He Junhua, No 760513; 3 females, Zhejiang, Qingyuan Baishanzu, 3.XI.1993, Wu Hong, No 946428, 946444, 946428; 1 female, Zhejiang, Suichang Baimashan, 8.IV.1994, Chen Hanlin, No 941513; 1 female, Zhejiang, Suichang, 1980, Chen Hanlin, No 810141; 1 female, Zhejiang, Songyang, 19.VII.1986, Chen Hanlin, No 870529; 1 female, Zhejiang, Sanmen, 1980, Xie Baoyu, No 810059; 1 female, Zhejiang, Taishun Wuyanling, 28.VII–VIII.5.2005, Liu Jingxian, No 200610371; 1 female, Zhejiang Taizhou, V.1982, No 822293; 1 female, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, 28. VI.1983, Zhao Lin, No 840256; 1 female, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, 28. VI.1983, Zhaolin, No 840256; 1 female, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, 2–4. VI.1990, He Junhua, No 904382. Description. Female (Fig. 9) holotype. Body length 7.3 mm, fore wing length 4.8 mm. Head. Antenna with 40 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.5× longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 10E) granulose. Clypeus (Fig. 10E) granulose with sparse punctures, slightly convex, apical margin almost truncated. Malar space granulose, 0.45× basal width of mandible. Mandible with a very weak lamella, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 10F) 1.7× ocello-ocular distance and 2.5× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, subpolished. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina slightly above mandible base. Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose with sparse punctures dorsally, subpolished, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 10G) granulose punctate, rugose in notaulic region. Scutellum granulose-punctate. Metanotum granulose. Mesopleuron (Fig. 10B) granulose-punctate, becoming rugose above mesopleural fovea, trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Metapleuron granulose. Propodeum (Fig. 10C) with area basalis trapezoid; area superomedia area confluent with area petiolaris, deeply depressed medially; area petiolaris trans-striate medially; median carina absent under costula, present posteriorly; latero-longitudinal carina weakly developed; propodeal spiracle small and oval. Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 10A) areolet present and with a short stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 1.8× longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (70°). Hind wing with nervellus slightly inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.15. Legs. Hind femur 5.3× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.5× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate. Metasoma. Mat. First metasomal segment (Fig. 10H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove present. First tergite 3.2× longer than width of postpetiole. Second tergite 0.86× as long as first tergite, 1.8× longer than its apical width; thyridium oval, its distance from basal margin of tergite 3.5× its diameter. Third tergite 1.3× longer than its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites with emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.6× longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 10D) gradually upcurved. Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth, palpi and tegula, yellowish brown; scape and pedicel brown; fore and mid legs yellowish brown with coxa brown; hind leg with coxa and trochanter black, trochantellus and tibia medially yellowish brown, femur blackish brown, remainder of hind leg brown; metasoma with second tergite apically and from third tergite on laterally brown, remainder of metasoma black. Variation. Antenna with 34–40 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.3–1.5× longer than second flagellomere; malar space 0.3–0.45× basal width of mandible; interocellar distance 1.3–1.7× ocello-ocular distance and 1.7–2.5× distance between median and lateral ocelli; hind femur 4.4–5.3× longer than wide; first tergite 3.0–3.2× longer than width of postpetiole; second tergite 0.8–0.9× as long as first tergite, 1.5–1.8× longer than its apical width; third tergite 0.9–1.3× longer than its apical width; ovipositor sheath 1.5–1.7× longer than hind femur. Distribution. China (Anhui, Fujian, Guangxi, Guizhou, Hebei, Heilongjiang, Jilin, Jiangsu, Jiangxi, Liaoning, Shandong, Sichuan, Zhejiang). Comparative diagnosis. This species runs in the key by Maheshwary & Gupta (1977) to C. oriens Gupta & Maheshwary, 1977, but differs from the latter by having interocellar distance 2.5× distance between median and lateral ocelli, mesopleuron granulose-punctate, propodeal median area deeply depressed, fore and mid legs with coxae brown, and hind femur blackish brown. Etymology. Name derived from “angustus” (Latin for “narrow”) and “aulacis” (Latin for “furrow”), because its propodeal median area has a narrow groove.

Campoplex cyclus sp. nov. Figs. 23–24 Material examined. Holotype: female, Xinjiang, Lugexian Shuikuxiang, 11.VIII.2002, Hu Hongying, No 20037129 (ZJUH). Description. Female (Fig. 23) holotype. Body length 4.8 mm, fore wing length 3.5 mm. Head. Antenna with at least 14 flagellomeres (apical segments missing); first flagellomere 1.35× longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 24E) granulose. Clypeus (Fig. 24E) mat, not convex, apical margin truncated, sharp. Malar space granulose, 0.5× basal width of mandible. Mandible with a very weak lamella, with upper tooth longer than lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 24F) 1.5× ocello-ocular distance and 1.7× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple swollen behind eye, mat. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina slightly above mandible base. Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose dorsally with minute punctures, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 24G) and scutellum granulose-punctate. Metanotum granulose. Mesopleuron (Fig. 24B) granulose-punctate, trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Metapleuron granulose with sparse punctures. Propodeum (Fig. 24C) granulose; area basalis triangular; area superomedia granulose; area petiolaris trans-striate; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, slightly depressed medially; all carina strong; propodeal spiracle small and oval. Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 24A) areolet present and with a short stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 2.0× longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (70°). Hind wing with nervellus inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.2 of its length. Legs. Hind femur 4.0× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.48× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate, its teeth weak. Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 24H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, with dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove. Postpetiole and second tergite granulose. Second tergite 0.7× as long as first tergite, as long as its apical width; thyridium round, its distance from basal margin of tergite equal to its diameter. Third tergite 0.6× as long as its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.5× longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 24D) gradually upcurved. Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth, palpi and tegula, fore, mid and hind trochantellus, yellow; scape and pedicel blackish brown; coxae blackish brown; remainder of fore leg yellowish brown with apical tarsus brown; mid trochanter, femur, apical of tibia and apical tarsus brownish, remainder of mid leg yellowish brown; hind trochanter, femur, subbase and apex of tibia and tarsus from basal tarsi 0.5 on blackish brown, with tibia medially and basal tarsi 0.5 yellowish brown; metasoma entirely black. Distribution. China (Xinjiang). Comparative diagnosis. This species is similar to C. lobatus sp. nov., but differs from the latter by having apical margin of clypeus not thick medially, mesopleuron granulose-punctate, propodeal area superomedia granulose, latero-longitudinal carina strongly developed, vein 1cu-a opposite M&RS, second metasomal tergite as long as its apical width, and metasoma entirely black. Etymology. Name derived from “cyclus” (Latin for “circle”), because its head is round in anterior view.

Campoplex acarus sp. nov. Figs. 3–4 Material examined. Holotype: female, Hubei, Shennongjia Muyuzhen, 19.V.2012, Huang Junhao, No 20046116 (ZJUH). Description. Female (Fig. 3) holotype. Body length 3.6 mm, fore wing length 2.8 mm. Head. Antenna with at least 16 flagellomeres (apical segments missing); first flagellomere 1.15× longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 4E) granulose. Clypeus (Fig. 4E) granulose, slightly convex, apical margin slightly arched. Malar space granulose, 0.8× basal width of mandible. Mandible without lamella, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 4F) 1.2× ocello-ocular distance and 1.6× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, subpolished, slightly swollen behind eyes. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina at mandible base. Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose, polished, not trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 4G) granulose, notauli indistinct. Scutellum and metanotum granulose. Mesopleuron (Fig. 4B) granulose, weakly trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Metapleuron (Fig. 4B) granulose. Propodeum (Fig. 4C) with area basalis trapezoid; area superomedia granulose, polished; area petiolaris rugose; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, not depressed; all carina distinctly developed but not high; propodeal spiracle small and round. Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 4A) without areolet. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 2.1× longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (60°). Hind wing with nervellus inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.1. Legs. Hind femur 5.0× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.55× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws not pectinate. Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 4H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, with dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove. First tergite 2.8× longer than width of postpetiole. Postpetiole and second tergite granulose, mat. Second tergite 0.8× as long as first tergite, 3.0× longer than its apical width; thyridium round, its distance from basal margin of tergite 2.0× its diameter. Third tergite equal to its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.9× longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 4D) gradually upcurved. Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth, palpi, tegula, fore and mid legs trochanters and trochantellus, fore coxa apically and hind trochantellus whitish yellow; scape and pedicel blackish brown; fore coxa basally and telotarsus brown, remainder of fore leg yellowish brown; mid leg brown except tibia medially pale whitish; hind leg blackish brown with tibia medially pale whitish; metasoma entirely black. Distribution. China (Hubei). Comparative diagnosis. This species is similar to C. granulosus sp. nov., but differs from the latter by having apical margin of clypeus slightly arched, malar space 0.8× basal width of mandible, temple not swollen behind eyes, pronotum not trans-striate below, propodeal area petiolaris rugose, second metasomal tergite 3.0× longer than its apical width, and body color different. Etymology. Name derived from “acares” (Greek for “short and small”), because its body size is small.

Campoplex strigatus sp. nov. Figs. 75–76 Material examined. Holotype: 1 female, Zhejiang, Hangzhou Nangaofeng, 5.VII.2003, Chen Xuexin, No 20056145 (ZJUH). Paratypes: 1 female, Zhejiang, Hangzhou Fengyangshan, 15. VI.2003, Wu Qiong, No 20056030; 1 female, Zhejiang, Hangzhou Wuyunshan, 3.X.2008, Tan Jiangli, No 20081723; 1 female, Heilongjiang, Jingpohu, 26.VIII.1995, Lou Juxian, No 962376; 1 female, Liaoning, Xiongyue, VII.1955, No 65031.6. Description. Female (Fig. 75) holotype. Body length 7.8 mm, fore wing length 5.5 mm. Head. Antenna with 37 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.4× longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 76E) rugose, weak laterally. Clypeus (Fig. 76E) granulose-punctate, convex, apical margin slightly arched. Malar space granulose, 0.5× basal width of mandible. Mandible with lamella, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons rugose, median carina present. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 76F) 2.0× ocello-ocular distance and 2.0× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, mat, not swollen behind eyes. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina at mandible base. Mesosoma. Pronotum punctate dorsally, subpolished, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 76G) granulosepunctate, becoming rugose in notaulic region. Scutellum and metanotum rugose-punctate. Mesopleuron (Fig. 76B) rugose-punctate, trans-striate below tegula, striations extending to prepectal carina, speculum smooth and shiny. Metapleuron (Fig. 76B) granulose-punctate, rugose ventrally. Propodeum (Fig. 76C) with area basalis trapezoid; area superomedia rugose; area petiolaris trans-striate; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, with a deep groove medially; all carina distinctly developed; propodeal spiracle small and oval. Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 76A) areolet present and with a short stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 1.8× longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (70°). Hind wing with nervellus inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.1. Legs. Hind femur 4.6× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.5× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate. Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 76G) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, without dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove. First tergite 3.0× longer than width of postpetiole. Second tergite 0.75× as long as first tergite, 1.4× longer than its apical width; thyridium round, its distance from basal margin of tergite 1.5× its diameter. Metasoma from third tergite on strongly compressed. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.8× longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 76D) gradually upcurved. Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth yellowish brown; scape and pedicel brown; tegula whitish yellow; fore leg entirely yellow except coxa basally and telotarsus brown; mid leg yellow except coxa and telotarsus brown; hind coxa blackish brown, trochanter, trochantellus, tibia basally and apically, tarsus except basal tarsomere 0.8 brown, femur reddish brown, tibia medially and basal tarsomere 0.8 yellowish brown; first tergite and second tergite except apically black, second tergite apically and third tergite apico-laterally reddish brown, remainder of metasoma brown. Variation. Second metasomal tergite 1.4–2.2× longer than its apical width; thyridium 1.5–3.0× its diameter separated from the base of second tergite; scape and pedicel yellowish-brown to brown. Distribution. China (Heilongjiang, Liaoning, Zhejiang). Comparative diagnosis. This species runs in the key by Maheshwary & Gupta (1977) to C. sticticus Gupta & Maheshwary, 1977, but differs from the latter by having pronotum punctate dorsally, metapleuron rugose-punctate, nervellus inclivous and intercepted at lower 0.1, and first metasomal segment without dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove. Etymology. Name derived from “strigis” (Latin for “groove”), because its propodeum has a deep groove medially.

Campoplex xuthomelonus sp. nov. Figs. 83���84 Material examined. Holotype: female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 8.X.1982, Ma Yun, No 826113 (ZJUH). Paratypes: 1 female, Fujian, Wuyishan, 20.IX.1989, Wang Jiashe, No 964206; 1 female, Fujian, Wuyishan, 18.VIII.1984, Zhang Kechi, No 860667; 1 female, 1 male, Fujian, Wuyishan, 14.VII.1994, Chen Xuexin, No 943666, 943664; 1 male, Fujian, Wuyishan Qiliguadun, 18.IV.2009, Zengjie, No 201605323; 1 male, Fujian, Wuyishan Sangangguadun, 18.IV.2009, Wang Manman, No 201605775; 1 female, Guangdong, Shixing Chebaling, 25. V.2002, Xu Zaifu, No 201806165; 1 male, Guangxi Damingshan, 6.VIII.2011, Yan Chengjin, No 201108006; 2 males, Guizhou, Dushan, 6. V.1980, Zhou Shengzhen, No 860552, 860539; 1 female, Guizhou, Fanjinshan Jinding, 10.VII.1993, Chen Xuexin, No 937487; 2 females, Guizhou, Xishui, 26.IX.2000, Ma Yun, No 200102281, 200102738; 1 female, Hubei, Shennongjia Qianjiapin, 21. V.2012, Shi Kai, No 201204451; 1 female, Shanxi, Lishan Dahe, 20.VII.2012, Liu Zhen, No 201206019; 1 male, Sichuan, Chongqing, 24.VII.1980, He Junhua, No 801974; 1 female, Sichuan, Guanxian, 4.VIII.1980, He Junhua, No 802013; 1 female, Yunnan, Lijiang Ninglangladuhe, 19.VIII.2003, Li Tingjing, No 20046213; 1 female, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, 28. VI.1991, He Junhua, No 911187; 1 female, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, 21. V.1983, He Junhua, No 830292; 1 female, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, 12. VI.1958, Hu Cui, No 5855.7; 14 males, Zhejiang, Qingyuan Baishanzu, 22.IV.1994, Wu Hong, No 947063, 947029, 947070, 947071, 947028, 947072, 947073, 947025, 947073, 947025, 947074, 947076, 947075, 947067, 947069, 980639; 1 female, Zhejiang, Songyang, 7.VII.1992, Chen Hanlin, No 924533; 1 female, Zhejiang, Songyang, 27. VI.1994, Chen Hanlin, No 954191; 1 female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 16.X.1982, He Junhua, No 826303; 2 males, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 27. V.1999, Zhao Mingshui, No 995361,995783; 1 female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 30.VII.1998, Zhao Mingshui, No 999236; 1 female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 27. VI.1998, Zhao Mingshui, No 999517; 1 female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 4.IX.1987, Chen Xuexin, No 877098; 1 male, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 13. VI.1998, Chen Xuexin, No 980674; 1 female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 8.X.1982, Ma Yun, No 826113; 1 female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 17. VI.1983, Zhou Caie, No 830726; 1 female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 8.X.1982, Ma Yun, No 826113; 1 female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 17. VI.1983, Zhou Caie, No 830726. Description. Female (Fig. 83) holotype. Body length 6.3 mm, fore wing length 4.0 mm. Head. Antenna with 34 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.35�� longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 84E) strongly granulose. Clypeus (Fig. 84E) mat, slightly convex, apical margin slightly curved. Malar space granulose, 0.6�� basal width of mandible. Mandible with lamella. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 84F) 1.45�� ocello-ocular distance and 2.0�� distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple nearly smooth, subpolished. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina at mandible base. Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose dorsally, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 84G) granulose. Scutellum granulose with posterior rugose. Metanotum rugose-punctate. Mesopleuron (Fig. 84B) granulose-punctate, transstriate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Metapleuron (Fig. 84B) granulose with sparse and minute punctures. Propodeum (Fig. 84C) with anterior transverse carina close to base; area superomedia granulose; area petiolaris trans-striate; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, slightly depressed medially; all carina strong; propodeal spiracle small and oval. Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 84A) areolet present and with a short stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 1.8�� longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (70��). Hind wing with nervellus inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.25 of its length. Legs. Hind femur 4.5�� longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.52�� as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate. Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 84H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, with weak dorso-lateral carina and a shallow lateral groove. Postpetiole and second tergite granulose. Second tergite 0.73�� as long as first tergite, 1.7�� longer than its apical width; thyridium oval, small, its distance from basal margin of tergite 3.0�� its length. Third tergite 1.1�� longer than its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 2.0�� longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 84D) gradually upcurved. Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth, malar space, palpi and tegula, yellowish brown; all coxae and hind trochanter, black; remainder of leg yellowish brown with base and apex of hind tibia, apical segments of fore and middle tarsus and whole of hind tarsus, infuscated; metasoma entirely black. Male. Propodeal carina stronger and surface structure of propodeum coarser; otherwise similar to female. Variation. Propodeal lateral carina weak to strong, second metasomal tergite 1.7���2.0�� longer than its apical width. Distribution. China (Fujian, Guangdong, Guangxi, Guizhou, Hubei, Shanxi, Sichuan, Yunnan, Zhejiang). Comparative diagnosis. This species runs in the key by Maheshwary & Gupta (1977) to C. anatolus Gupta & Maheshwary, 1977, but differs from the latter by having the malar space yellowish brown, all propodeal carinae strong, and punctures of mesopleuron dorsally larger and denser than in C. anotolus. Etymology. Name derived from ���xuthos��� (Greek for ���yellowish brown���) and ���melon��� (Greek for ���cheek���), because its malar space is yellowish brown., Published as part of Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van & Chen, Xue-Xin, 2021, The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China, pp. 1-121 in Zootaxa 5066 (1) on pages 115-120, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5653939, {"references":["Gupta, V. K. & Maheshwary, S. (1977) Ichneumonologia Orientalis, Part IV. The tribe Porizontini (= Campoplegini) (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Oriental Insects Monograph, 5, 1 - 267."]}

Campoplex lobatus sp. nov. Figs. 43���44 Material examined. Holotype: female, Xinjiang, Tianchi, 6.VII.1991, He Junhua, No 913429 (ZJUH). Description. Female (Fig. 43) holotype. Body length 3.8 mm, fore wing length 2.8 mm. Head. Antenna with at least 20 flagellomeres (apical segments missing); first flagellomere as long as second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 44E) granulose. Clypeus (Fig. 44E) with minute punctures, mat, not convex, apical margin truncated, sharp, thick medially. Malar space granulose, 0.5�� basal width of mandible. Mandible with lamella indistinct, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth, tapered apically. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 44F) 1.5�� ocello-ocular distance and 2.0�� distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple swollen behind eye, mat. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina slightly above mandible base. Mesosoma. Pronotum rugulose dorsally, polished, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 44G), scutellum and metanotum granulose. Mesopleuron (Fig. 44B) punctate, trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Propodeum (Fig. 44C) granulose; area basalis triangular; area superomedia smooth and shiny, weakly rugulosegranulose; area petiolaris trans-striate; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, slightly depressed medially; latero-longitudinal carina developed but weak; propodeal spiracle small and round. Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 44A) areolet present and with a moderate stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 1.8�� longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a distad of M&RS by 0.2 of its length. External angles of second discal cell acute (70��). Hind wing with nervellus vertical, intercepted at lower 0.4 of its length. Legs. Hind femur 4.6�� longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.45�� as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate, its teeth weak. Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 44H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, without dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove. First tergite 2.5�� longer than width of postpetiole. Postpetiole and second tergite granulose, mat. Second tergite 0.8�� as long as first tergite, 1.25�� longer than its apical width; thyridium round, its distance from basal margin of tergite equal to its diameter. Third tergite as long as its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.4�� longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 44D) abruptly upcurved apically. Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth, palpi and tegula, fore and mid trochanters and trochantellus, hind trochantellus yellow; scape and pedicel blackish brown; coxae brown; remainder of fore leg yellowish brown with telotarsus infuscated; mid femur basally, tibia apically and from first tarsomere 0.5 on brownish, remainder of mid leg yellowish brown; hind trochanter, femur, subbase and apex of tibia and from basal tarsomere 0.5 on brown, with hind trochantellus, tibia medially and basal tarsomere 0.5 yellowish brown; metasoma black with second and third segments somewhat brown. Distribution. China (Xinjiang). Comparative diagnosis. This species runs in the key by Maheshwary & Gupta (1977) to C. rufigastor Gupta & Maheshwary, 1977, but differs from the latter by having clypeus truncated and thick medially, interocellar distance 1.5�� ocello-ocular distance, mesopleuron and metapleuron punctate, and metasomal colour different. Etymology. Name derived from ���lobus��� (Latin for ���protuberance���), because its clypeus is thick medially and has a lobe-like protuberance., Published as part of Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van & Chen, Xue-Xin, 2021, The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China, pp. 1-121 in Zootaxa 5066 (1) on pages 64-65, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5653939, {"references":["Gupta, V. K. & Maheshwary, S. (1977) Ichneumonologia Orientalis, Part IV. The tribe Porizontini (= Campoplegini) (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Oriental Insects Monograph, 5, 1 - 267."]}

Campoplex grandialphus sp. nov. Figs. 31���32 Material examined. Holotype: female, Jilin, Tonghua, 1.VIII.1994, Lou Juxian, No 976691 (ZJUH). Paratype: female, Jilin, Tonghua, 1.VIII.1994, Lou Juxian, No976660. Description. Female (Fig. 31) holotype. Body length 6.8 mm, fore wing length 4.5 mm. Head. Antenna with at least 33 flagellomeres (apical segments missing); first flagellomere 1.1�� longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 32E) strongly granulose. Clypeus (Fig. 32E) granulose-punctate, slightly convex, apical margin arched. Malar space granulose, 0.6�� basal width of mandible. Mandible with lamella. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 32F) 2.1�� ocello-ocular distance and 1.9�� distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, subpolished. Occipital carina gradually narrow dorsally. Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose-punctate dorsally, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 32G) granulosepunctate, becoming rugose in notaulic area. Scutellum granulose with posterior rugose. Metanotum granulose. Mesopleuron (Fig. 32B) granulose-punctate, trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Propodeum (Fig. 32C) with area basalis trapezoid; area superomedia granulose; area petiolaris trans-striate; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, moderately depressed medially; all carina moderately developed; propodeal spiracle small and round. Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 32A) areolet present and with a short stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 1.8�� longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a slightly distad of M&RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (70��). Hind wing with nervellus intercepted above the middle. Legs. Hind femur 4.1�� longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.6�� as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate. Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 32H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, lateral carina and lateral groove almost absent. Postpetiole and second tergite finely granulose. Second tergite 0.75�� as long as first tergite, 1.3�� longer than its apical width; thyridium large, its distance from basal margin of tergite 0.8�� its length. Third tergite slightly shorter than its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.7�� longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 32D) gradually upcurved. Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth, scape and pedicel black; palpi and tegula yellowish brown; fore leg from coxa on yellowish brown except telotarsus brown, coxa black; mid leg from trochantellus on yellowish brown except telotarsus brown, coxa black, trochanter and trochantellus blackish brown; hind coxa, trochanter and trochantellus black, femur reddish brown, tibia yellowish brown except basally and apically brown, tarsus brown with telotarsus darker; metasoma black. Variation. Occipital carina evenly arched or gradually narrow dorsally; mesoscutum becoming rugose or not in notaulic area; hind wing with nervellus intercepted above the middle or at lower 0.4. Distribution. China (Jilin). Comparative diagnosis. This species runs in the key by Maheshwary & Gupta (1977) to C. anatolus Gupta & Maheshwary, 1977, but differs from the latter by having apical margin arched, interocellar distance 2.1�� ocellar-ocular distance, metapleuron granulose-punctate, nervellus broken above the middle, thyridium large, mandible except teeth black, and mid leg trochanter and trochantellus blackish brown. Etymology. Name derived from ���grandis��� (Latin for ���large���) and ���alphus��� (Latin for ���spot���), because its thyridium is large as compared to other species in this genus., Published as part of Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van & Chen, Xue-Xin, 2021, The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China, pp. 1-121 in Zootaxa 5066 (1) on pages 48-49, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5653939, {"references":["Gupta, V. K. & Maheshwary, S. (1977) Ichneumonologia Orientalis, Part IV. The tribe Porizontini (= Campoplegini) (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Oriental Insects Monograph, 5, 1 - 267."]}

Campoplex liuae sp. nov. Figs. 41–42 Material examined. Holotype: female, Shanxi, Lishan Xiachuan, 25.VII.2012, Liu Zhen, No 201208778 (ZJUH). Description. Female (Fig. 41) holotype. Body length 5.2 mm, fore wing length 3.8 mm. Head. Antenna with 31 flagellomeres; first flagellomere equal to the length of second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 42E) granulose-punctate. Clypeus (Fig. 42E) granulose with sparse punctures, slightly convex, apical margin almost truncated. Malar space granulose, 0.5× basal width of mandible. Mandible with a weak lamella, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 42F) 1.5× ocello-ocular distance and 2.0× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, subpolished. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina slightly above mandible base. Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose-punctate dorsally, subpolished, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 42G) granulose punctate. Scutellum punctate and rugose posteriorly. Metanotum granulose. Mesopleuron (Fig. 42B) punctate, trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Metapleuron (Fig. 42B) granulose-punctate, punctures smaller and sparser than that on mesopleuron. Propodeum (Fig. 42C) granulose; area basalis triangular with carina posteriorly emerged; area superomedia granulose; area petiolaris granulose medially, rugose laterally; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, slightly depressed; all carina strongly developed; propodeal spiracle small and oval. Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 42A) areolet present and with a short stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 2.0× longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a slightly distad of M&RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (60°). Hind wing with nervellus inclivous, intercepted at its middle. Legs. Hind femur 4.4× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.6× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate. Metasoma. Mat. First metasomal segment (Fig. 42H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove absent. First tergite 2.5× longer than width of postpetiole. Second tergite 0.6× as long as first tergite, 0.85× its apical width; thyridium round, its distance from basal margin of tergite equal to its diameter. Third tergite 0.55× as long as its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.2× longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 42D) gradually upcurved. Colour. Black. Mandible medially and palpi yellowish brown; antenna, scape and pedicel brown; tegula yellow; fore leg yellowish brown with coxa black and telotarsus brown; mid leg yellowish brown with coxa and telotarsus black, trochanter basally brown; hind leg with coxa and trochanter black, tarsus except basal tarsomere 0.8 brown, remainder of hind leg yellowish brown; metasoma with postpetiole, second to fourth tergites anteriorly and subsequent tergites laterally yellowish brown, remainder of metasoma black. Distribution. China (Shanxi). Comparative diagnosis. This species is similar to C. adustantennalis sp. nov., but differs from the latter by having first flagellomere as long as second flagellomere, malar space, vertex and metanotum granulose, propodeal area basalis triangular and emerged posteriorly, area superomedia without punctures, propodeal carina strong, hind tibia entirely yellowish brown, and the colour of metasoma different. Etymology. This species is named in honour of Prof. Zhen Liu, the collector of the holotype.

Campoplex pseudostrigatus sp. nov. Figs. 69���70 Material examined. Holotype: female, Yunnan, Anning, 18.VII.1988, Chen Xuexin, No 881522 (ZJUH). Paratype: 1 female, Yunnan Lijiang, 18.VIII.2003, Li Yanjing, No 20046116. Description. Female (Fig. 69) holotype. Body length 8.0 mm, fore wing length 5.0 mm. Head. Antenna with 38 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.3�� longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 70E) rugose-punctate. Clypeus (Fig. 70E) granulose-punctate, convex, apical margin arched. Malar space granulose, 0.6�� basal width of mandible. Mandible with lamella, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina present. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 70F) 1.8�� ocello-ocular distance and 2.5�� distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, mat, not swollen behind eyes. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina at mandible base. Mesosoma. Pronotum punctate dorsally, subpolished, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 70G) granulosepunctate, rugose in notaulic region. Scutellum granulose-punctate anteriorly, rugose posteriorly. Metanotum rugosepunctate. Mesopleuron (Fig. 70B) punctate, trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Metapleuron (Fig. 70B) granulose-punctate, rugose ventrally. Propodeum (Fig. 70C) with area basalis trapezoid; area superomedia trans-rugose; area petiolaris trans-striate; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, with a deep groove medially; latero-longitudinal carina absent; propodeal spiracle small and oval. Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 70A) areolet present and with a moderate stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 2.0�� longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (60��). Hind wing with nervellus inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.1. Legs. Hind femur 4.1�� longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.6�� as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate. Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 70H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, dorso-lateral carina weakly present. without lateral groove. First tergite 2.7�� longer than width of postpetiole. Second tergite 0.7�� as long as first tergite, 1.5�� longer than its apical width; thyridium round, its distance from basal margin of tergite 2.0�� its diameter. Third tergite 1.3�� longer than its width. Metasoma from third tergite on strongly compressed. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.6�� longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 70D) gradually upcurved. Colour. Black. Mandible medially yellowish brown; scape and pedicel brown; tegula yellowish brown; fore leg entirely yellowish brown except coxa brown; mid leg yellowish brown except coxa and telotarsus brown; hind coxa blackish brown, trochanter, trochantellus, tibia basally and apically, tarsus except basal tarsomere 0.8 brown, femur reddish brown, tibia medially and basal tarsomere 0.8 yellowish brown; metasoma entirely black. Variation. Propodeal median groove moderately deep to strongly deep, lateral carina absent or present; second metasomal tergite 1.5���1.8�� longer than its apical width. Distribution. China (Yunnan). Comparative diagnosis. This species is similar to C. strigatus sp. nov., but differs from the latter by having mesopleuron with striations not extending to prepectal carina, lateral carina of propodeum absent, dorso-lateral carina of first metasomal segment present and metasoma entirely black. Etymology. Name derived from ���pseudo��� (Greek for ���pseudo���), and the specific name ��� strigatus ���, because of its similarity to C. strigatus sp. nov., Published as part of Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van & Chen, Xue-Xin, 2021, The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China, pp. 1-121 in Zootaxa 5066 (1) on pages 99-101, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5653939

Campoplex grandicella sp. nov. Figs. 33–34 Material examined. Holotype: female, Xizang, Xiayadong, 19.VII.2013, Liu Zhen, No 201400874 (ZJUH). Description. Female (Fig. 33) holotype. Body length 5.0 mm, fore wing length 3.7 mm. Head. Antenna with 31 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.3× longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 34E) granulose. Clypeus (Fig. 34E) granulose, slightly convex, apical margin arched, blunt. Face and clypeus combined equal to minimum width of face. Malar space granulose, 0.8× basal width of mandible. Mandible with a very weak lamella, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 34F) 1.0× ocello-ocular distance and 1.6× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple nearly smooth, subpolished, not swollen behind eyes. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina at mandible base. Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose-punctate dorsally, subpolished, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 34G) granulose, notauli indistinct. Scutellum and metanotum granulose. Mesopleuron (Fig. 34B) granulose, weakly trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Metapleuron (Fig. 34B) granulose. Propodeum (Fig. 34C) with area basalis triangular; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, trans-striate, slightly depressed; medio-longitudinal carina very weak; latero-longitudinal carina absent; propodeal spiracle small and round. Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 34A) areolet present and without stalk, emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 1.7× longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (70°). Hind wing with nervellus inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.35. Legs. Hind femur 5.0× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.57× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate, its teeth weak. Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 34H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, with weak dorso-lateral carina anteriorly and without lateral groove. First tergite 2.5× longer than width of postpetiole. Postpetiole and second tergite granulose, finely granulose on subsequent tergites, subpolished. Second tergite 0.75× as long as first tergite, 1.3× longer than its apical width; thyridium round, its distance from basal margin of tergite 1.5× its diameter. Third tergite as long as its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites with weak emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.3× longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 34D) gradually upcurved. Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth, palpi and tegula yellow; scape and pedicel blackish brown; fore coxa basally, dorsal surface of tibia and tarsus brown, trochanter and trochantellus yellow, remainder of fore leg yellowish brown; mid coxa basally, femur dorsally, tibia basally and apically, and tarsus brown, trochanter and trochantellus yellow, remainder of mid leg yellowish brown; hind coxa black, trochanter, trochantellus basally, femur, tibia basally and apically and tarsus blackish brown, trochantellus apically and tibia medially yellowish brown; metasoma from third tergite on yellowish brown laterally. Distribution. China (Xizang). Comparative diagnosis. This species is similar to C. pseudocollinus Gupta & Maheshwary, 1977, but differs from the latter by having face and clypeus combined equal to minimum width of face, malar space granulose, 0.8× basal width of mandible, propodeal area superomedia trans-rugose, fore wing areolet large and without stalk, hind wing with nervellus inclivous, and body color different. Etymology. Name derived from “grandis” (Latin for “large”) and “cella” (Latin for “cell”), because its fore wing areolet is large.

Campoplex tanae sp. nov. Figs. 79–80 Material examined. Holotype: female, Shaanxi, Foping, Liangfengya, 30.VII.2013, Tan Jiangli, No 201303440 (ZJUH). Description. Female (Fig. 79) holotype. Body length 4.8 mm, fore wing length 3.2 mm. Head. Antenna with at least 18 flagellomeres (apical segments missing); first flagellomere 1.2× longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 80D) granulose, weak laterally. Clypeus (Fig. 80D) granulose, almost truncated apically. Malar space mat, 0.7× basal width of mandible. Mandible with a weak lamella, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons granulose-punctate, median carina present. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 80E) 1.0× ocello-ocular distance and 1.4× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple nearly smooth, subpolished, not swollen behind eyes. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina above mandible base. Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose dorsally, subpolished, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 80F) granulose, becoming rugose in notaulic area. Scutellum granulose, becoming rugose posteriorly. Metanotum granulose. Mesopleuron (Fig. 80B) granulose with sparse punctures, trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Metapleuron (Fig. 80B) granulose. Propodeum (Fig. 80C) with area basalis trapezoid; area superomedia granulose, subpolished; area petiolaris rugose; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, not depressed medially; median carina weakly developed under costula, becoming stronger posteriorly; latero-longitudinal carina absent; propodeal spiracle small and round. Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 80A) areolet present and with a short stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 1.7× longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (60°). Hind wing with nervellus slightly inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.3. Legs. Hind femur 4.2× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.5× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws nearly not pectinate, teeth very weak basally. Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 80G) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, without dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove. First tergite 3.3× longer than width of postpetiole. Second tergite as long as first tergite, 2.0× longer than its apical width; thyridium oval, its distance from basal margin of tergite 3.0× its diameter. Third tergite 1.4× longer than its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.4× longer than hind femur, ovipositor gradually upcurved. Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth, palpi and tegula yellowish brown; scape and pedicel blackish brown; fore and mid legs with trochanters, trochantellus and coxae apically yellow, coxae basally and apical tarsus brown, remainder of fore and mid legs yellowish brown; hind leg with coxa blackish brown, trochanter, trochantellus, tibia subbasally and apically infuscated, tarsus brown, remainder of hind leg yellowish brown; metasoma from third tergite on laterally yellowish brown, remainder of metasoma black. Distribution. China (Shaanxi). Comparative diagnosis. This species runs in the key by Maheshwary & Gupta (1977) to C. manaliensis Gupta & Maheshwary, 1977, but differs from the latter by having face granulose, interocellar distance equal to ocello-ocular distance, area petiolaris rugose, and scape and pedicel blackish brown. Etymology. This species is named in honour of Prof. Jiangli Tan, the collector of the holotype.

Campoplex xizangensis sp. nov. Figs. 81���82 Material examined. Holotype: female, Xizang, Yangzhuoyongchuo, 15.VII.2015, 3048m, N29.79��, E93.91��, 15.VII.2015, Liu Zhen, No201409026 (ZJUH). Description. Female (Fig. 81) holotype. Body length 9.0 mm, fore wing length 6.2 mm. Head. Antenna with at least 30 flagellomeres (apical segments missing); first flagellomere 1.3�� longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 82E) rugose-punctate. Clypeus (Fig. 82E) rugose-punctate, slightly convex, apical margin arched, blunt. Malar space nearly smooth, 0.5�� basal width of mandible. Mandible with lamella, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons rugose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 82F) 1.3�� ocello-ocular distance and 1.7�� distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, subpolished, not swollen behind eyes. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina at mandible base. Mesosoma. Pronotum rugulose-punctate dorsally, mat, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 82G) granulosepunctate, becoming rugose in notaulic region. Scutellum granulose-punctate anteriorly, rugose posteriorly. Metanotum rugose. Mesopleuron (Fig. 82B) punctate, trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny, rugose above mesopleural fovea. Metapleuron (Fig. 82B) rugose-punctate. Propodeum (Fig. 82C) with area basalis trapezoid; area superomedia rugulose, subpolished; area petiolaris trans-striate; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, with a moderately groove medially; all carinae developed; propodeal spiracle small and oval. Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 82A) areolet present and with a short stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 2.0�� longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a slightly distad of M&RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (60��). Hind wing with nervellus inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.1. Legs. Hind femur 5.0�� longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.55�� as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate. Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 82H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove present. First tergite 2.8�� longer than width of postpetiole. Second tergite 0.75�� as long as first tergite, 1.3�� longer than its apical width; thyridium oval, its distance from basal margin of tergite 2.0�� its length. Third tergite 1.4�� longer than its width. Metasoma from third tergite on strongly compressed. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 2.2�� longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 82D) gradually upcurved. Colour. Black. Mandible medially yellowish brown; scape and pedicel blackish brown; tegula yellowish brown; fore leg entirely yellowish brown except coxa brown; mid leg yellowish brown except coxa and telotarsus brown; hind coxa black, trochanter, trochantellus, tibia basally and apically and tarsus blackish-brown, femur and tibia medially reddish brown; metasoma entirely black. Distribution. China (Xizang). Comparative diagnosis. This species runs in the key by Maheshwary & Gupta (1977) to C. homonae Gupta & Maheshwary, 1977, but differs from the latter by having face and clypeus rugose-punctate, pronotum rugulosepunctate dorsally, prepectal carina without a notch-like constriction, areolet relatively large and higher than stalk, and mandible yellowish brown medially. Etymology. Name derived from the name of type locality of species., Published as part of Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van & Chen, Xue-Xin, 2021, The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China, pp. 1-121 in Zootaxa 5066 (1) on pages 113-115, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5653939, {"references":["Gupta, V. K. & Maheshwary, S. (1977) Ichneumonologia Orientalis, Part IV. The tribe Porizontini (= Campoplegini) (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Oriental Insects Monograph, 5, 1 - 267."]}

Campoplex shanxiensis sp. nov. Figs. 73���74 Material examined. Holotype: female, Shanxi, Taigu, 20.I.1984, Zeng Kecheng, host: Telphusa chloroderces, No 840930 (ZJUH). Paratype: 1 female, Shanxi, Taigu, 3.VIII.1983, Zeng Kecheng, host: Adoxophyes orana, No 850112. Description. Female (Fig. 73) holotype. Body length 5.3 mm, fore wing length 3.8 mm. Head. Antenna with at least 25 flagellomeres (apical segments missing); first flagellomere 1.3�� longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 74E) granulose. Clypeus (Fig. 74E) granulose and mat medially, with minute punctures, slightly convex, apical margin truncate, slightly thick medially. Malar space granulose, 0.6�� basal width of mandible. Mandible without lamella, upper tooth equal to lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 74F) 1.7�� ocello-ocular distance and 1.5�� distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, subpolished, not immediately receding after eye. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina at mandible base. Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose-punctate dorsally, subpolished, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 74G) granulose punctate. Scutellum punctate. Metanotum finely granulose. Mesopleuron (Fig. 74B) punctate, punctures denser ventrally, trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Metapleuron (Fig. 74B) punctate, punctures sparser than that on mesopleuron. Propodeum (Fig. 74C) with area basalis triangular; area superomedia nearly smooth and shiny, weakly granulose; area petiolaris strongly rugose; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, not depressed; all carina distinctly developed; propodeal spiracle small and oval. Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 74A) areolet present and with a short stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 1.6�� longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (75��). Hind wing with nervellus inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.3 of its length. Legs. Hind femur 4.6�� longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.5�� as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate. Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 74H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, without dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove. First tergite 2.4�� longer than width of postpetiole. Postpetiole and second tergite granulose, mat. Second tergite 0.6�� as long as first tergite, equal to its apical width; thyridium round, its distance from basal margin of tergite equal to its diameter. Third tergite 0.6�� as long as its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.3�� longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 74D) gradually upcurved. Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth, palpi and tegula, yellowish brown; scape and pedicel blackish brown; pterostigma whitish basally; fore coxa, trochanter, trochantellus and telotarsus brown, remainder of fore leg yellowish brown; mid coxa, trochanter, base of trochantellus, base of femur, tibia ventrally and telotarsus brown, tibia dorsally whitish yellow, remainder of mid leg yellowish brown; hind coxa, trochanter, trochantellus and base of femur, brownish, tibia clearly banded with base and apex blackish brown, whitish yellow medially, tarsus blackish brown; metasoma black with apical tergites somewhat blackish brown. Distribution. China (Shanxi). Comparative diagnosis. This species runs in the key by Maheshwary & Gupta (1977) to C. phthorimaeae (Cushman, 1915), but differs from the latter by having mesosoma subpolished, hind femur yellowish brown except brownish basally, metasoma entirely black with apical tergites somewhat blackish brown, and area superomedia not as wide as area petiolaris. Etymology. Name derived from the name of type locality of species., Published as part of Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van & Chen, Xue-Xin, 2021, The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China, pp. 1-121 in Zootaxa 5066 (1) on pages 103-105, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5653939, {"references":["Gupta, V. K. & Maheshwary, S. (1977) Ichneumonologia Orientalis, Part IV. The tribe Porizontini (= Campoplegini) (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Oriental Insects Monograph, 5, 1 - 267.","Cushman, R. A. (1915) Descriptions of new Ichneumonidae and taxonomic notes. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington, 17, 132 - 142."]}

Campoplex monochroma sp. nov. Figs. 51–52 Material examined. Holotype: female, Zhejiang, Lishui Fengyangshan, 9.VIII.2003, Wu Qiong, No 20042321 (ZJUH). Paratypes: 1 female, Guangdong, Shixing Chebaling, 25. V.2002, Xu Zaifu, No 201806185; 3 females, Henan, Neixiang Wangoulinchang, 11.VII. 1998, Chen Xuexin, No 985939; 1 female, Jilin, Fusong Donggangzhen, 30.VIII.1989, Li Lin, No 974169; 1 female, Neimeng, Gegentala, 16.VIII.2000, Ma Yun, No 200100852; 1 female, Shaanxi, Hanzhong Liubaxian, 20.VIII.2013, Tu Binbin, No 201309161; 3 females, Shenyang National Forest Park, 16. VII.2011, Yan Chenjin, No 201103694, 201103690, 201103695; 3 females, Zhejiang, Longquan Fengyangshan, 10.VIII.2003, Liu Jingxian, No 201804841, 201805167, 201804175; 2 females, Zhejiang, Longquan Fengyangshan, 22.VIII.1982, Song Qisheng, No 826561, 826560; 1 female, Zhejiang, Longquan Fengyangshan, 16.VIII.1982, Le Yanhua, No 826757; 1 female, Zhejiang, Qingyuan Baishanzu, 30.VII.1993, Wu Hong, No 945170; 1 female, Zhejiang, Suichang Jiulongshan, 18.VII.1994, Xu Zaifu, No 944491; 4 females, Zhejiang, Songyang, 17.VII.1994, Xu Zaifu, No 944382, 943976, 944195, 944197. Description. Female (Fig. 51) holotype. Body length 6.2 mm, fore wing length 4.3 mm. Head. Antenna with at least 34 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.15× longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 52E) granulose-punctate. Clypeus (Fig. 52E) punctate, punctures larger than that on face, slightly convex, apical margin arched, thick medially. Malar space granulose, 0.5× basal width of mandible. Mandible with lamella basally, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 52F) 1.5× ocello-ocular distance and 1.9× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, subpolished. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina above mandible base. Mesosoma. Pronotum punctate dorsally, subpolished, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 52G) granulose punctate, becoming rugose in notaulic region anteriorly. Scutellum with sparse and minute punctures, rugose posteriorly. Metanotum rugose-punctate. Mesopleuron (Fig. 52B) punctate, trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Metapleuron (Fig. 52B) punctate. Propodeum (Fig. 52C) with area basalis triangular, long and narrow; area superomedia granulose medially and short rugose laterally, polished; area petiolaris trans-striate; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, slightly depressed; all carina distinctly developed; propodeal spiracle small and oval. Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 52A) areolet present and with a moderate stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 2.0× longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (65°). Hind wing with nervellus inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.3 of its length. Legs. Hind femur 4.0× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.5× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate. Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 52H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, with weak dorso-lateral carina, and with a shallow groove. First tergite 2.5× longer than width of postpetiole. Postpetiole and second tergite granulose, mat. Second tergite 0.6× as long as first tergite, 0.85× its apical width; thyridium round, its distance from basal margin of tergite equal to its diameter. Third tergite 0.8× as long as its apical width. Metasoma not compressed apically. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.7× longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 52D) gradually upcurved. Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth, palpi, fore and middle legs entirely and tegula, yellow with telotarsus brownish; scape and pedicel yellowish brown anteriorly and brown dorsally; hind coxa black, trochanter except basally, femur and tibia yellowish brown, tibia unicolorous, slightly infuscated apically, tarsus brown; metasoma entirely black with second and third segments slightly blackish brown. Variation. First flagellomere 1.1–1.25× second flagellomere; face granulose to granulose-punctate; frons with median carina absent or present; pronotum granulose-punctate to punctate dorsally; specimens from Shenyang province with ovipositor thinner; scape and pedicel entirely brown or yellowish-brown anteriorly; specimens from Henan province with hind tibia banded. Distribution. China (Guangdong, Henan, Jinlin, Neimeng, Shaanxi, Shenyang, Zhejiang). Comparative diagnosis. This new species is similar to C. proportionis sp. nov., but differs from the latter by having second tergite 0.8–0.9× as long as its apical width, thyridium separated from the basal margin of tergite by its diameter, metasoma not compressed apically, malar space and frons granulose, and metanotum rugose-punctate. Etymology. Name derived from “mono-” (Greek for “single”), and “chroma” (Greek for “colour”), because its hind tibia is unicolorous.

Campoplex medicarinatus sp. nov. Figs. 49–50 Material examined. Holotype: female, Guizhou, Guiyang, 15.X.1983, He Junhua, No834559 (ZJUH). Description. Female (Fig. 49) holotype. Body length 5.2 mm, fore wing length 4.4 mm. Head. Antenna with 30 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.4× longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 50E) granulose-punctate. Clypeus (Fig. 50E) granulose-punctate, slightly convex, apical margin slightly arched, thick medially. Malar space granulose, 0.6× basal width of mandible. Mandible without lamella, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina present. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 50F) 1.2× ocello-ocular distance and 2.0× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, subpolished, not swollen behind eyes. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina slightly above mandible base. Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose-punctate dorsally, subpolished, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 50G) granulose punctate. Scutellum punctate and rugose posteriorly. Metanotum rugose-punctate. Mesopleuron (Fig. 50B) punctate, trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Metapleuron (Fig. 50B) granulose. Propodeum (Fig. 50C) granulose; area basalis triangular, long and narrow; area superomedia granulose; area petiolaris rugose; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, not depressed; all carina strongly developed; propodeal spiracle small and oval. Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 50A) areolet present and with a short stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 2.0× longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a slightly distad of M&RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (70°). Hind wing with nervellus inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.15. Legs. Hind femur 5.0× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.5× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws with indistinct teeth basally. Metasoma. Mat. First metasomal segment (Fig. 50H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove weakly present. First tergite 2.7× longer than width of postpetiole. Second tergite 0.6× as long as first tergite, 0.8× its apical width; thyridium round, its distance from basal margin of tergite equal to its diameter. Third tergite 0.6× as long as its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath 1.5× longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 50D) gradually upcurved. Colour. Black. Mandible medially and palpi yellowish brown; mandible basally black; tegula yellow; scape and pedicel blackish brown; fore and mid legs yellowish brown except coxa and telotarsus blackish; hind leg with coxa, trochanter and trochantellus basally blackish brown, tibia apically infuscated, tarsus from basal tarsomere 0.8 on brown, remainder of hind leg yellowish brown; metasoma black except second tergite laterally yellowish brown. Distribution. China (Guizhou). Comparative diagnosis. This species is similar to C. liuae sp. nov., but differs from the latter by having first flagellomere 1.4× longer than second flagellomere, clypeus granulose-punctate, frons with median carina present, area petiolaris rugose, nervellus intercepted at lower 0.15, tarsal claws with indistinct teeth basally, and the colour of metasoma different. Etymology. Name derived from “medius” (Latin for “middle”) and “carina” (Latin for “carina”), because its frons has a median carina.

Campoplex angustaulacis sp. nov. Figs. 9���10 Material examined. Holotype: female, Shandong, Wendeng, XI.1985 ��� VI.1988, Hou Shaojin, No 863867 (ZJUH). Paratypes: 1 female, Anhui, Yuexi, 15.X.1981, Yang Fan, No 820649; 1 female, Fujian, Dehua Chishuizhen, 13.IX.2002, 1000m, Xu Zaifu, No 20025087; 1 female, Fujian, Dehua Daiyunshan, 15.IX.2002, 1000m, Li Fangfang, No 20025314; 1 female, Fujian, Meihuashan, 23���24.VII.1988, He Junhua, No 887364; 1 female, Fujian, Sangang, 7.X.1991, Chen Xuexin, No 920016; 1 female, Fujian, Sangang, 8.X.1985, Wang Jiashe, No 854451; 1 female, Fujian, Wuyishan Tongmu, 2���8.VIII.1983, He Junhua, No 832436; 1 female, Fujian, Wuyishan, 22.VII.1986, Wang Jiashe, No 870790; 1 female, Fujian, Shenzhou, X.1989, Wu Zhishan, No 20009631; 1 female, Fujian, Wuyishan, 18.IV.2009, Zeng Jie, No 201605335; 2 females, Guangxi, Jingang Dayaoshan, 14. VI.1982, He Junhua, No 822880, 823038; 1 female, Guangxi, Lipu, 17. VI.1982, He Junhua, No 823117; 2 females, Guangxi, Tianlin Langpin, 28. V.1982, No 821775, 822020; 1 female, Guizhou, Dashahe, 1615��� 1356m, 18.VIII.2004, Wei Shujun, No 201501902; 24 females, Guizhou, Duyun, V.1985, Liu Zhibang, No 850929, 850928, 850927, 850941, 850925, 850926, 850952, 850953, 850956, 850931, 850933, 850935, 850948, 850930, 850959, 850951, 850924, 850853, 850905, 850923, 850922, 850921, 850419, 850915, 861288, 861280, 861285, 861286; 1 female, Guizhou, Guiyang, 1. V.1981, Luo Qinghuai, No 814280; 1 female, Guizhou, Guiyang, 2. V.1983, Luo Qinghuai, No 850293; 1 female, Guizhou, Guiyang, 30.VIII.1987, He Junhua, No 878146; 2 females, Guizhou, Guiyang, VI.1982, Song Xuepei, No 834951; 3 females, Guizhou, Huishui, IX���X.1986, Chu Jiming, No 864493; 3 females, Guizhou, Meitan, V.1982, Xia Huaien, No 860685, 860686, 860687; 1 female, Hebei, Handan, VI.1978, Ma Zhongshi, No 790599; 1 female, Heilongjiang, 20. V.1979, Zhang Runsheng, Host: Laspeyresia zebeana, Zhang Runsheng, No 810375; 7 females, Heilongjiang, Heihe, Wan Li, No 810343 (7); 1 female, Jilin, Changchun, 4.IX.1985, Yan Hui, No 861283; 2 females, Jilin, Changchun, 25.VII.1985, Li Zhaofen, No 861279, 861292; 1 female, Jilin, Jiutai, 19. VI.1980, Liu Xiaoyu, No 861293; 1 female, Jilin, Jinyue, 11.X.1985, Li Zhaofen, No 861287; 1 female, Jilin, Songhuahu, IX���X.1985, Tang Minghe, No 860014; 1 female, Jiangsu, Sushui, 8.IV.1984, Qian Fanjun, Host: Dendrolimus sp., No 853210; 1 female, Jiangxi, Jiujiang, 17.III.1981, Peng Guohuang, No 810359; 1 female, Jiangxi, Lushan, 10���12.VIII.1982, He Junhua, No 825210; 2 females, Liaoning, Tieceng, 1.IX.1974, Host: Dendrolimus sp., Zhou Jiazhi, No 772210, 791154; 125 females, Shandong, Wendeng, XI.1985 ��� VI.1988, Hou Shaojin, No 862063, 863864, 864705, 863873, 863874, 862080, 863870, 863871, 863872, 863885, 863882, 863881, 863880, 862079, 862076, 862073, 861757, 862064, 862081, 861758, 862072, 861760, 861756, 861755, 886952, 861759, 862071, 862070, 862069, 862068, 862067, 862065, 888743, 888742, 886954, 886918, 888724, 888727, 875001, 875006, 874989, 874990, 861764, 861996, 888718, 881440, 878931, 875005, 861763, 875019, 888960, 888947, 875000, 875008, 875013, 878926, 878927, 878929, 878932, 878933, 878934, 878936, 878937, 874997, 874998, 874999, 854178, 853624, 853625, 864626, 864689, 864687, 853629, 864686, 864715, 864713, 864706, 864701, 864690, 864712, 864711, 864710, 864709, 864702, 863888, 864887, 864703, 864685, 878914, 863866, 863868, 863869, 878921, 878920, 878938, 878924, 878940, 878939, 863865, 878925, 863878, 888749, 863877, 863889, 864718, 864719, 864722, 863875, 863876, 864720, 864720, 864921,8889494, 881444, 863879, 888752, 888740, 888730, 881443, 881442, 881441, 881434, 881433, 881424, 881423, 881426; 1 female, Shandong, Wendeng, 26. VI.1988, Wang Liwen, No 886933; 2 females, Shandong, Wendeng, 1.VII.1988, Hou Xinpin, No 886927, 886944; 10 females, Shandong, Yantai, 1987, Hou Shaojin, No 871518, 871314, 871313, 871311, 871309, 871304, 871295, 871303, 871294, 871312; 1 female, Sichuan, Chengdu, 1979, He Rongrong, No 810623; 1 female, Sichuan, Rongjing, 1980, Xie Daben, No 813568; 2 females, Zhejiang, Deqing Fatou, 27. V.1995, He Junhua, No 954304, 954305; 1 female, Zhejiang, Fengyangshan, 26.VII.2007, Liu Jingxian, No 201891370; 1 female, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, 9.VII.1982, Xu Houliang, No 923169; 1 female, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, VII.1986, He Junhua, No 862020; 1 female, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, 28. VI.1989, He Junhua, No 893608; 1 female, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, IV.1990, Rong Luqi, No 900078; 1 female, Zhejiang, Lishui Fengyangshan, 9.VIII.2003, Wu Qiong, No 20042298; 1 female, Zhejiang, Putuoshan, 4. VI.1975, He Junhua, No 760513; 3 females, Zhejiang, Qingyuan Baishanzu, 3.XI.1993, Wu Hong, No 946428, 946444, 946428; 1 female, Zhejiang, Suichang Baimashan, 8.IV.1994, Chen Hanlin, No 941513; 1 female, Zhejiang, Suichang, 1980, Chen Hanlin, No 810141; 1 female, Zhejiang, Songyang, 19.VII.1986, Chen Hanlin, No 870529; 1 female, Zhejiang, Sanmen, 1980, Xie Baoyu, No 810059; 1 female, Zhejiang, Taishun Wuyanling, 28.VII���VIII.5.2005, Liu Jingxian, No 200610371; 1 female, Zhejiang Taizhou, V.1982, No 822293; 1 female, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, 28. VI.1983, Zhao Lin, No 840256; 1 female, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, 28. VI.1983, Zhaolin, No 840256; 1 female, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, 2���4. VI.1990, He Junhua, No 904382. Description. Female (Fig. 9) holotype. Body length 7.3 mm, fore wing length 4.8 mm. Head. Antenna with 40 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.5�� longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 10E) granulose. Clypeus (Fig. 10E) granulose with sparse punctures, slightly convex, apical margin almost truncated. Malar space granulose, 0.45�� basal width of mandible. Mandible with a very weak lamella, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 10F) 1.7�� ocello-ocular distance and 2.5�� distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, subpolished. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina slightly above mandible base. Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose with sparse punctures dorsally, subpolished, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 10G) granulose punctate, rugose in notaulic region. Scutellum granulose-punctate. Metanotum granulose. Mesopleuron (Fig. 10B) granulose-punctate, becoming rugose above mesopleural fovea, trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Metapleuron granulose. Propodeum (Fig. 10C) with area basalis trapezoid; area superomedia area confluent with area petiolaris, deeply depressed medially; area petiolaris trans-striate medially; median carina absent under costula, present posteriorly; latero-longitudinal carina weakly developed; propodeal spiracle small and oval. Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 10A) areolet present and with a short stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 1.8�� longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (70��). Hind wing with nervellus slightly inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.15. Legs. Hind femur 5.3�� longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.5�� as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate. Metasoma. Mat. First metasomal segment (Fig. 10H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove present. First tergite 3.2�� longer than width of postpetiole. Second tergite 0.86�� as long as first tergite, 1.8�� longer than its apical width; thyridium oval, its distance from basal margin of tergite 3.5�� its diameter. Third tergite 1.3�� longer than its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites with emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.6�� longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 10D) gradually upcurved. Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth, palpi and tegula, yellowish brown; scape and pedicel brown; fore and mid legs yellowish brown with coxa brown; hind leg with coxa and trochanter black, trochantellus and tibia medially yellowish brown, femur blackish brown, remainder of hind leg brown; metasoma with second tergite apically and from third tergite on laterally brown, remainder of metasoma black. Variation. Antenna with 34���40 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.3���1.5�� longer than second flagellomere; malar space 0.3���0.45�� basal width of mandible; interocellar distance 1.3���1.7�� ocello-ocular distance and 1.7���2.5�� distance between median and lateral ocelli; hind femur 4.4���5.3�� longer than wide; first tergite 3.0���3.2�� longer than width of postpetiole; second tergite 0.8���0.9�� as long as first tergite, 1.5���1.8�� longer than its apical width; third tergite 0.9���1.3�� longer than its apical width; ovipositor sheath 1.5���1.7�� longer than hind femur. Distribution. China (Anhui, Fujian, Guangxi, Guizhou, Hebei, Heilongjiang, Jilin, Jiangsu, Jiangxi, Liaoning, Shandong, Sichuan, Zhejiang). Comparative diagnosis. This species runs in the key by Maheshwary & Gupta (1977) to C. oriens Gupta & Maheshwary, 1977, but differs from the latter by having interocellar distance 2.5�� distance between median and lateral ocelli, mesopleuron granulose-punctate, propodeal median area deeply depressed, fore and mid legs with coxae brown, and hind femur blackish brown. Etymology. Name derived from ���angustus��� (Latin for ���narrow���) and ���aulacis��� (Latin for ���furrow���), because its propodeal median area has a narrow groove., Published as part of Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van & Chen, Xue-Xin, 2021, The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China, pp. 1-121 in Zootaxa 5066 (1) on pages 20-23, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5653939, {"references":["Gupta, V. K. & Maheshwary, S. (1977) Ichneumonologia Orientalis, Part IV. The tribe Porizontini (= Campoplegini) (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Oriental Insects Monograph, 5, 1 - 267."]}

Campoplex galbipedis sp. nov. Figs. 37���38 Material examined. Holotype: female, Zhejiang, Hangzhou Nangaofeng, 5.VII.2003, Chen Xuexin, No 20056130 (ZJUH). Description. Female (Fig. 37) holotype. Body length 6.8 mm, fore wing length 4.2 mm. Head. Antenna with 33 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.2�� longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 38E) granulose. Clypeus (Fig. 38E) granulose punctate, slightly convex, apical margin arched, blunt. Malar space granulose, 0.3�� basal width of mandible. Mandible with lamella, with upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 38F) 1.3�� ocello-ocular distance and 1.6�� distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple not swollen behind eye, mat. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina at mandible base. Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose dorsally with minute punctures, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 38G) granulose, becoming rugose in notaulic region. Scutellum granulose, becoming rugose posteriorly. Metanotum granulose-rugose. Mesopleuron (Fig. 38B) granulose-punctate, trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Propodeum (Fig. 38C) granulose; area basalis trapezoid; area superomedia rugulose; area petiolaris transstriate; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, slightly depressed medially; all carina strong; propodeal spiracle small and oval. Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 38A) areolet present and with a moderate stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 1.8�� longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (65��). Hind wing with nervellus inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.25 of its length. Legs. Hind femur 4.8�� longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.6�� as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate. Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 38H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, without dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove. Postpetiole and second tergite granulose. Second tergite 0.8�� as long as first tergite, 1.8�� longer than its apical width; thyridium oval, its distance from basal margin of tergite 2.0�� its length. Third tergite length equal to its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.5�� longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 38D) gradually upcurved. Colour. Black. Mandible medially, palpi and tegula yellow; scape and pedicel yellowish brown in front, brown dorsally; fore leg yellow except coxa basally brown; mid leg yellow except coxa basally and apical tarsi brown; hind coxa black, femur orange yellow, telotarsus brown, remainder of hind leg yellow; metasoma with first tergite and second tergite except apically black, second tergite apically yellowish brown, from third tergite on brown. Distribution. China (Zhejiang). Comparative diagnosis. This species is similar to C. anatolus sp. nov., but differs from the latter by having malar space 0.35�� basal width of mandible, mesopleuron granulose-punctate, propodeal carina strong, fore and mid coxae apically yellow, hind tarsus with only telotarsus brown, and metasoma not entirely black. Etymology. Name derived from ���galbus��� (latin for ���yellow���) and ���pedis��� (Latin for ���foot���), because its legs are largely yellow., Published as part of Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van & Chen, Xue-Xin, 2021, The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China, pp. 1-121 in Zootaxa 5066 (1) on pages 56-58, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5653939

Campoplex pseudostrigatus sp. nov. Figs. 69–70 Material examined. Holotype: female, Yunnan, Anning, 18.VII.1988, Chen Xuexin, No 881522 (ZJUH). Paratype: 1 female, Yunnan Lijiang, 18.VIII.2003, Li Yanjing, No 20046116. Description. Female (Fig. 69) holotype. Body length 8.0 mm, fore wing length 5.0 mm. Head. Antenna with 38 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.3× longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 70E) rugose-punctate. Clypeus (Fig. 70E) granulose-punctate, convex, apical margin arched. Malar space granulose, 0.6× basal width of mandible. Mandible with lamella, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina present. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 70F) 1.8× ocello-ocular distance and 2.5× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, mat, not swollen behind eyes. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina at mandible base. Mesosoma. Pronotum punctate dorsally, subpolished, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 70G) granulosepunctate, rugose in notaulic region. Scutellum granulose-punctate anteriorly, rugose posteriorly. Metanotum rugosepunctate. Mesopleuron (Fig. 70B) punctate, trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Metapleuron (Fig. 70B) granulose-punctate, rugose ventrally. Propodeum (Fig. 70C) with area basalis trapezoid; area superomedia trans-rugose; area petiolaris trans-striate; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, with a deep groove medially; latero-longitudinal carina absent; propodeal spiracle small and oval. Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 70A) areolet present and with a moderate stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 2.0× longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (60°). Hind wing with nervellus inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.1. Legs. Hind femur 4.1× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.6× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate. Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 70H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, dorso-lateral carina weakly present. without lateral groove. First tergite 2.7× longer than width of postpetiole. Second tergite 0.7× as long as first tergite, 1.5× longer than its apical width; thyridium round, its distance from basal margin of tergite 2.0× its diameter. Third tergite 1.3× longer than its width. Metasoma from third tergite on strongly compressed. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.6× longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 70D) gradually upcurved. Colour. Black. Mandible medially yellowish brown; scape and pedicel brown; tegula yellowish brown; fore leg entirely yellowish brown except coxa brown; mid leg yellowish brown except coxa and telotarsus brown; hind coxa blackish brown, trochanter, trochantellus, tibia basally and apically, tarsus except basal tarsomere 0.8 brown, femur reddish brown, tibia medially and basal tarsomere 0.8 yellowish brown; metasoma entirely black. Variation. Propodeal median groove moderately deep to strongly deep, lateral carina absent or present; second metasomal tergite 1.5–1.8× longer than its apical width. Distribution. China (Yunnan). Comparative diagnosis. This species is similar to C. strigatus sp. nov., but differs from the latter by having mesopleuron with striations not extending to prepectal carina, lateral carina of propodeum absent, dorso-lateral carina of first metasomal segment present and metasoma entirely black. Etymology. Name derived from “pseudo” (Greek for “pseudo”), and the specific name “ strigatus ”, because of its similarity to C. strigatus sp. nov.

Campoplex obtusoclypeus sp. nov. Figs. 53���54 Material examined. Holotype: female, Liaoning, Laotuding, 16.VII.2011, Zhao Kexin, No 201103248 (ZJUH). Description. Female (Fig. 53) holotype. Body length 6.4 mm, fore wing length 5.3 mm. Head. Antenna with 35 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.3�� longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 54E) granulose, weak laterally. Clypeus (Fig. 54E) granulose dorsally, smooth and shiny below, slightly convex, apical margin blunt, slightly arched. Malar space shiny, 0.4�� basal width of mandible. Mandible with a weak lamella, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 54F) 0.8�� ocello-ocular distance and 1.4�� distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, subpolished, not swollen behind eyes. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina above mandible base. Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose dorsally, polished, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 54G) granulose. Scutellum and metanotum granulose. Mesopleuron (Fig. 54B) granulose, trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny, rugulose above mesopleural fovea. Metapleuron (Fig. 54B) granulose. Propodeum (Fig. 54C) with area basalis trapezoid; area superomedia granulose; area petiolaris granulose-rugulose; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, slightly depressed; median and lateral longitudinal carinae absent; propodeal spiracle small and oval. Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 54A) areolet present and with a short stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 2.0�� longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (70��). Hind wing with nervellus slightly inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.1. Legs. Hind femur 4.6�� longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.57�� as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate basally, teeth very weak. Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 54H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, dorso-lateral carina present, lateral groove absent. First tergite 2.5�� longer than width of postpetiole. Second tergite 0.8�� as long as first tergite, 1.4�� longer than its apical width; thyridium oval, its distance from basal margin of tergite 1.7�� its length. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.1�� longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 54D) gradually upcurved. Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth, palpi and tegula yellowish brown; scape and pedicel blackish brown; fore leg yellowish brown except coxa and telotarsus brown, trochanter and trochantellus yellow; mid leg yellowish brown except coxa, femur basal-ventrally and telotarsus brown, trochanter and trochantellus yellow; hind leg with extreme base of femur yellowish brown, tibia medially and basal tarsomere 0.6 whitish yellow, remainder of hind leg black; metasoma entirely black. Distribution. China (Liaoning). Comparative diagnosis. This species runs in the key by Maheshwary & Gupta (1977) to C. collinus Gupta & Maheshwary, 1977, but differs from the latter by having face granulose, interocellar distance 0.8�� ocello-ocular distance and 1.4�� distance between median and lateral ocelli, metapleuron granulose, and mid leg largely yellowish brown. Etymology. Name derived from ���obtusus��� (Latin for ���blunt���) and ���clypeus��� (Latin for ���clypeus���), because the apical margin of the clypeus is blunt., Published as part of Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van & Chen, Xue-Xin, 2021, The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China, pp. 1-121 in Zootaxa 5066 (1) on pages 77-78, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5653939, {"references":["Gupta, V. K. & Maheshwary, S. (1977) Ichneumonologia Orientalis, Part IV. The tribe Porizontini (= Campoplegini) (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Oriental Insects Monograph, 5, 1 - 267."]}

Campoplex taenius sp. nov. Figs. 77���78 Material examined. Holotype: female, Heilongjiang, Jingpohu, 26.VIII.1995, Lou Juxian, No962459 (ZJUH). Description. Female (Fig. 77) holotype. Body length 3.8 mm, fore wing length 2.8 mm. Head. Antenna with 23 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.3�� longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 78E) granulose. Clypeus (Fig. 78E) granulose, slightly convex, apical margin almost truncated. Malar space granulose, 0.45�� basal width of mandible. Mandible with a weak lamella, upper tooth slightly longer than lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 78F) 1.6�� ocello-ocular distance and 1.8�� distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, subpolished, not swollen behind eyes. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina above mandible base. Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose dorsally, mat, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 78G) granulose, notauli indistinct. Scutellum and metanotum granulose. Mesopleuron (Fig. 78B) granulose, weakly trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Metapleuron (Fig. 78B) granulose. Propodeum (Fig. 78C) with area basalis triangular; area superomedia granulose, mat; area petiolaris granulose; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, slightly depressed; all carina distinctly developed; propodeal spiracle small and oval. Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 78A) areolet present and with a short stalk, emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 2.1�� longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (60��). Hind wing with nervellus vertical, intercepted at lower 0.25. Legs. Hind femur 4.4�� longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.55�� as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate. Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 78H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, with dorso-lateral carina and a shallow lateral groove. First tergite 2.5�� longer than width of postpetiole. Postpetiole and second tergite granulose, mat. Second tergite 0.75�� as long as first tergite, 1.6�� longer than its apical width; thyridium round, its distance from basal margin of tergite 1.8�� its diameter. Third tergite 1.2�� longer than its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.7�� longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 78D) gradually upcurved. Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth, palpi, tegula, fore and mid trochanters and trochantellus, and hind trochantellus, yellow; scape and pedicel blackish brown; fore and mid coxae basally and telotarsus brown, remainder of fore and mid legs yellowish brown; hind leg with coxa black, trochanter, femur, tibia subbasally and apically, tarsus from basal tarsomere 0.7 on blackish brown, remainder of hind leg whitish yellowish, and metasoma black with apical tergites laterally blackish brown. Distribution. China (Heilongjiang). Comparative diagnosis. This species is similar to C. perpendicularis sp. nov., but differs from the latter by having upper tooth slightly longer than lower tooth, propodeal area superomedia wider, median area slightly depressed, costula weaker, medio-longitudinal carina not weak under costula, and metasoma black with apical tergites laterally blackish brown. Etymology. Name derived from ���taenia��� (Latin for ���band���), because its hind tibia clearly banded., Published as part of Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van & Chen, Xue-Xin, 2021, The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China, pp. 1-121 in Zootaxa 5066 (1) on pages 108-110, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5653939

Campoplex strigatus sp. nov. Figs. 75���76 Material examined. Holotype: 1 female, Zhejiang, Hangzhou Nangaofeng, 5.VII.2003, Chen Xuexin, No 20056145 (ZJUH). Paratypes: 1 female, Zhejiang, Hangzhou Fengyangshan, 15. VI.2003, Wu Qiong, No 20056030; 1 female, Zhejiang, Hangzhou Wuyunshan, 3.X.2008, Tan Jiangli, No 20081723; 1 female, Heilongjiang, Jingpohu, 26.VIII.1995, Lou Juxian, No 962376; 1 female, Liaoning, Xiongyue, VII.1955, No 65031.6. Description. Female (Fig. 75) holotype. Body length 7.8 mm, fore wing length 5.5 mm. Head. Antenna with 37 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.4�� longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 76E) rugose, weak laterally. Clypeus (Fig. 76E) granulose-punctate, convex, apical margin slightly arched. Malar space granulose, 0.5�� basal width of mandible. Mandible with lamella, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons rugose, median carina present. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 76F) 2.0�� ocello-ocular distance and 2.0�� distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, mat, not swollen behind eyes. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina at mandible base. Mesosoma. Pronotum punctate dorsally, subpolished, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 76G) granulosepunctate, becoming rugose in notaulic region. Scutellum and metanotum rugose-punctate. Mesopleuron (Fig. 76B) rugose-punctate, trans-striate below tegula, striations extending to prepectal carina, speculum smooth and shiny. Metapleuron (Fig. 76B) granulose-punctate, rugose ventrally. Propodeum (Fig. 76C) with area basalis trapezoid; area superomedia rugose; area petiolaris trans-striate; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, with a deep groove medially; all carina distinctly developed; propodeal spiracle small and oval. Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 76A) areolet present and with a short stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 1.8�� longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (70��). Hind wing with nervellus inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.1. Legs. Hind femur 4.6�� longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.5�� as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate. Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 76G) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, without dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove. First tergite 3.0�� longer than width of postpetiole. Second tergite 0.75�� as long as first tergite, 1.4�� longer than its apical width; thyridium round, its distance from basal margin of tergite 1.5�� its diameter. Metasoma from third tergite on strongly compressed. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.8�� longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 76D) gradually upcurved. Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth yellowish brown; scape and pedicel brown; tegula whitish yellow; fore leg entirely yellow except coxa basally and telotarsus brown; mid leg yellow except coxa and telotarsus brown; hind coxa blackish brown, trochanter, trochantellus, tibia basally and apically, tarsus except basal tarsomere 0.8 brown, femur reddish brown, tibia medially and basal tarsomere 0.8 yellowish brown; first tergite and second tergite except apically black, second tergite apically and third tergite apico-laterally reddish brown, remainder of metasoma brown. Variation. Second metasomal tergite 1.4���2.2�� longer than its apical width; thyridium 1.5���3.0�� its diameter separated from the base of second tergite; scape and pedicel yellowish-brown to brown. Distribution. China (Heilongjiang, Liaoning, Zhejiang). Comparative diagnosis. This species runs in the key by Maheshwary & Gupta (1977) to C. sticticus Gupta & Maheshwary, 1977, but differs from the latter by having pronotum punctate dorsally, metapleuron rugose-punctate, nervellus inclivous and intercepted at lower 0.1, and first metasomal segment without dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove. Etymology. Name derived from ���strigis��� (Latin for ���groove���), because its propodeum has a deep groove medially., Published as part of Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van & Chen, Xue-Xin, 2021, The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China, pp. 1-121 in Zootaxa 5066 (1) on pages 105-106, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5653939, {"references":["Gupta, V. K. & Maheshwary, S. (1977) Ichneumonologia Orientalis, Part IV. The tribe Porizontini (= Campoplegini) (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Oriental Insects Monograph, 5, 1 - 267."]}

Campoplex grandialphus sp. nov. Figs. 31–32 Material examined. Holotype: female, Jilin, Tonghua, 1.VIII.1994, Lou Juxian, No 976691 (ZJUH). Paratype: female, Jilin, Tonghua, 1.VIII.1994, Lou Juxian, No976660. Description. Female (Fig. 31) holotype. Body length 6.8 mm, fore wing length 4.5 mm. Head. Antenna with at least 33 flagellomeres (apical segments missing); first flagellomere 1.1× longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 32E) strongly granulose. Clypeus (Fig. 32E) granulose-punctate, slightly convex, apical margin arched. Malar space granulose, 0.6× basal width of mandible. Mandible with lamella. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 32F) 2.1× ocello-ocular distance and 1.9× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, subpolished. Occipital carina gradually narrow dorsally. Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose-punctate dorsally, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 32G) granulosepunctate, becoming rugose in notaulic area. Scutellum granulose with posterior rugose. Metanotum granulose. Mesopleuron (Fig. 32B) granulose-punctate, trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Propodeum (Fig. 32C) with area basalis trapezoid; area superomedia granulose; area petiolaris trans-striate; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, moderately depressed medially; all carina moderately developed; propodeal spiracle small and round. Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 32A) areolet present and with a short stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 1.8× longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a slightly distad of M&RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (70°). Hind wing with nervellus intercepted above the middle. Legs. Hind femur 4.1× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.6× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate. Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 32H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, lateral carina and lateral groove almost absent. Postpetiole and second tergite finely granulose. Second tergite 0.75× as long as first tergite, 1.3× longer than its apical width; thyridium large, its distance from basal margin of tergite 0.8× its length. Third tergite slightly shorter than its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.7× longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 32D) gradually upcurved. Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth, scape and pedicel black; palpi and tegula yellowish brown; fore leg from coxa on yellowish brown except telotarsus brown, coxa black; mid leg from trochantellus on yellowish brown except telotarsus brown, coxa black, trochanter and trochantellus blackish brown; hind coxa, trochanter and trochantellus black, femur reddish brown, tibia yellowish brown except basally and apically brown, tarsus brown with telotarsus darker; metasoma black. Variation. Occipital carina evenly arched or gradually narrow dorsally; mesoscutum becoming rugose or not in notaulic area; hind wing with nervellus intercepted above the middle or at lower 0.4. Distribution. China (Jilin). Comparative diagnosis. This species runs in the key by Maheshwary & Gupta (1977) to C. anatolus Gupta & Maheshwary, 1977, but differs from the latter by having apical margin arched, interocellar distance 2.1× ocellar-ocular distance, metapleuron granulose-punctate, nervellus broken above the middle, thyridium large, mandible except teeth black, and mid leg trochanter and trochantellus blackish brown. Etymology. Name derived from “grandis” (Latin for “large”) and “alphus” (Latin for “spot”), because its thyridium is large as compared to other species in this genus.

Campoplex densipunctatus sp. nov. Figs. 25���26 Material examined. Holotype: female, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, VI.1983, Shi Zuhua, No 830388 (ZJUH). Description. Female (Fig. 25) holotype. Body length 6.0 mm, fore wing length 4.5mm. Head. Antenna with 32 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.3�� longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 26E) granulose. Clypeus (Fig. 26E) with minute punctures, mat, slightly convex, apical margin widely arched, slightly thick medially. Malar space granulose, 0.7�� basal width of mandible. Mandible without lamella, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina present. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 26F) 1.75�� ocello-ocular distance and 2.3�� distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, mat. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina at mandible base. Mesosoma. Pronotum punctate dorsally, polished, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 26G), scutellum and metanotum granulose. Mesopleuron (Fig. 26B) granulose-punctate, punctures dense and separated less than their diameter, trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Metapleuron punctate, punctures sparser than that on mesopleuron. Propodeum (Fig. 26C) with area basalis trapezoid; area superomedia granulose; area petiolaris trans-striate; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, not depressed; all carina developed; propodeal spiracle small and oval. Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 26A) areolet present and with a short stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 2.0�� longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (60��). Hind wing with nervellus inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.3 of its length. Legs. Hind femur 4.7�� longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.5�� as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate. Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 26H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, without dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove. First tergite 2.5�� length of width of postpetiole. Postpetiole and second tergite granulose, mat. Second tergite 0.8�� as long as first tergite, 1.3�� longer than its apical width; thyridium round, its distance from basal margin of tergite 2.0�� its diameter. Third tergite as long as its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.5�� longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 26D) gradually upcurved. Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth, palpi, scape and pedicel in front, fore and mid legs entirely and tegula, yellow with femora and tibiae orange yellow; hind coxa black, trochanter blackish brown, trochantellus, femur and tibia yellowish brown, tibia infuscated at base and apex, tarsus brown; first metasomal segment entirely, second tergite entirely, third tergite except laterally, and remainder tergites dorso-medially, black; lateral surface of metasoma from third tergite on yellowish brown. Distribution. China (Zhejiang). Comparative diagnosis. This species runs in the key by Maheshwary & Gupta (1977) to C. manaliensis Gupta & Maheshwary, 1977, but differs from the latter by having mesopleuron densely punctate, metapleuron punctate, median longitudinal and lateral longitudinal carinae distinctly developed, pronotum shiny dorsally, and lateral surface of metasoma from third tergite on yellowish brown. Etymology. Name derived from ���densus��� (Latin for ���dense���) and ���punctatus��� (Latin for ���punctate���), because its mesopleuron is densely punctate., Published as part of Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van & Chen, Xue-Xin, 2021, The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China, pp. 1-121 in Zootaxa 5066 (1) on pages 41-43, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5653939, {"references":["Gupta, V. K. & Maheshwary, S. (1977) Ichneumonologia Orientalis, Part IV. The tribe Porizontini (= Campoplegini) (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Oriental Insects Monograph, 5, 1 - 267."]}

Campoplex granulosus sp. nov. Figs. 35–36 Material examined. Holotype: female, Xinjiang, Kuchewuqia, 2.IX.2004, Tu Erxun, No 20060145 (ZJUH). Paratypes: 1 female, Hubei, Shennongjia, 27.VIII.1982, He Junhua, No 825746; 4 females, 3 males, Jilin, Dongliao, 17. VI.1988, Zhao Mingcheng, host: pupa of Coleophora dahurica, No 883937 (4), 883936 (3); 1 male, Jilin, Dongliao, 17.VII.1988, Nie Shenglong, No 860159; 1 male, Jilin, Tonghua, 1.VIII.1994, Lou Juxian, No 976672; 1 female, Neimeng, Baotou Wudangzhao, 21.VIII.2000, Ma Yun, No 200100557; 1 female, Shandong, Bowen, 6.IX.1984, No 879198; 1 female, Xinjiang, Afanti Duolangxiang, 31.VIII.2004, Tu Erxun, No 200601193; 1 female, 1male, Xinjiang, Badan Kuerli, 8.VIII.2001, Hu Hongying, No 20036790, 20036821; 1 female, Xinjiang, Bazhou, IX.1983, Song Meijie, No 833962; 1 female, Xinjiang, Fukang Jiuyunjie, 17.VIII.2004, Tu Erxun, No 200600762; 1 female, Xinjiang, Hetian Moyutuohula, 30.VIII.2004, Tu Erxun, No 200601145; 1 female, Xinjiang, Kuerle Awatixiang, 3.IX.2004, Tu Erxun, No 200601415; 1 female, Xinjiang, Maigaiti, 27.VIII.2004, Tu Erxun, No 200600937; 1 female, Xinjiang, Shachexian, 19.VII.1991, He Junhua, No 912987, 913031, 912991; 1 female, Xinjiang, Shule, Tazihongxiang, 26.VIII.2004, Tu Erxun, No 200600908; 4 females, 2 males, Xinjiang, Wulumuqi, 26.VIII.1987, Ma Qi, No 880068, 880128, 880133, 880136, 880129, 880130; 3 females, 2 males, Xinjiang, Wulumuqi, 3.VIII.2001, Hu Hongying, No 20036042, 20036031, 20036014, 20036022, 20036027; 1 female, Xinjiang, Yuli Talimuxiang, 4.IX.2004, Tu Erxun, No 200601451. Description. Female (Fig. 35) holotype. Body length 4.3 mm, fore wing length 3.5 mm. Head. Antenna with 24 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.2× longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 36E) granulose. Clypeus (Fig. 36E) granulose, slightly convex, apical margin truncated, thick medially. Malar space granulose, 0.5× basal width of mandible. Mandible with a very weak lamella, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 36F) 1.5× ocelloocular distance and 1.8× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, mat, swollen behind eyes. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina above mandible base. Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose dorsally, mat, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 36G) granulose, notauli indistinct. Scutellum and metanotum granulose. Mesopleuron (Fig. 36B) granulose, weakly trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Metapleuron (Fig. 36B) granulose. Propodeum (Fig. 36C) with area basalis triangular, long and narrow; area superomedia granulose, mat; area petiolaris trans-striate; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, not depressed; all carina distinctly developed; propodeal spiracle small and oval. Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 36A) without areolet. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 2.1× longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (70°). Hind wing with nervellus vertical, intercepted at lower 0.25. Legs. Hind femur 4.0× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.55× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate, its teeth weak. Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 36H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, without dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove. First tergite 2.5× longer than width of postpetiole. Postpetiole and second tergite granulose, mat. Second tergite 0.7× as long as first tergite, equal to its apical width; thyridium round, its distance from basal margin of tergite 1.5× its diameter. Third tergite 0.9× as long as its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.4× longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 36D) gradually upcurved. Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth, palpi, yellow; scape and pedicel brown; tegula whitish; fore and mid trochanter and trochantellus whitish yellow, telotarsus brownish; remainder of fore and mid legs orange yellow; hind coxa black, trochanter basally blackish brown, femur and tibia yellowish brown, extreme apex of femur infuscated, tibia infuscated subbasally and apically, tarsus blackish brown except basal 0.8 yellowish brown; first metasomal segment entirely black; second tergite except apical laterally, third tergite except apically, fourth to seventh segments except laterally, blackish brown; remainder of metasoma reddish brown. Variation. Antenna with 24–26 flagellomeres, fore wing areolet absent or present and with 3rs-m vein incomplete, length of second tergite of metasoma 1.0–1.6× its apical width, scape and pedicel yellowish brown to blackish brown. Distribution. China (Hubei, Jilin, Neimenggu, Shandong, Xinjiang). Comparative diagnosis. This species is similar to C. lobatus sp. nov., but differs from the latter by having first flagellomere 1.2× longer than second flagellomere, mesopleuron granulose, thyridium separated from basal margin of tergite by 1.5× its diameter, mid and hind leg largely yellowish brown, and metasoma colour different. Etymology. Name derived from “granosus” (Latin for “granular”), because its body sculpture is largely granulose.

Campoplex anatolus Gupta & Maheshwary, 1977 Figs. 7���8 Campoplex anatolus Gupta & Maheshwary, 1977: 76���77. Material examined. 1 female, Fujian, Jiangle Longqishan, 8.VII.1991, Liu Changming, No 969704; 1 female, Fujian, Jiangle Longqishan, 30.IX.1991, Liu Changming, No 20007360; 1 female, Fujian, Nanjing, 8.VII.1991, Liu Changming, No 20006264; 1 female, Fujian, Nanping, 22.IX.2002, Liu Jingxian, No 20025259; 4 females, Fujian, Wuyishan Huanggangshan, 14.VII.1994, Chen Xuexin, No 942697, 942699, 942675, 942693; 2 females, Fujian, Wuyishan Huanggangshan, 14.VII.1994, Ye Shufeng, No 943395, 943381, 943281; 1 female, Fujian, Wuyishan Huangganshan, 17.VII.1994, Xu Zaifu, No 943340; 1 female, Fujian, Wuyishan Tongmu, 16.VII.1994, Xu Zaifu, No 942904; 1 female, Fujian, Wuyishan Xingcunzhen, 17.IV.2009, Tan Jiangli, No 201603235; 1 female, Fujian, Wuyishan Xingcunzhen, 17.IV.2009, YPT, No 201605673; 1 female, Fujian, Wuyishan, 6.VIII.1983, He Junhua, No 832760; 1 female, Guangdong, Dawuling, 1.X.2001, Xu Zaifu, No 20020501; 1 female, Guangdong, Liuxihe Forest Park, 30.III.2003, Wang Yiping, No 20032563; 1 female, Guangdong, Yangchun Huatan, 3. V.2002, Xu Zaifu, No 20027762; 3 females, Guangxi, Jinxiu Dayaoshan, 12. VI.1982, He Junhua, No 822782, 822898, 823017; 1 female, 1 male, Guizhou, Daozhen Xiannvdong, 24.VIII.2004, Wei Shujun, No 201505839, 201405681; 4 females, 1 male, Guizhou, Daozhen Dashahe, 18.VIII.2004, Wu Qiong, No 201506131, 201505681; 4 females, 1 male, Guizhou, Daozhen Dashahe, 18.VIII.2004, Wu Qiong, No 201506131, 201505146, 201505144, 201504857, 201505043; 1 female, 3 males, Guizhou, Fanjinshan Huguosi, 3.VIII.2001, 1300m, Piao Meihua, No 200108680, 200108681, 200108702, 200107716; 1 female, Henan, Ludai Shizifeng, 24.VII.1996, Cai Ping, No 973323; 1 female, Hubei, Wufeng Houhe, 1.VII.1999, Bo Wenjun, No 200104478; 1 male, Hubei, Shennongjia Qianjiaping, 26.VIII.1982, 1700m, He Junhua, No 825449; 3 females, Jilin, Changchun, 23.VII.1992, Lou Juxian, No 961037, 961049, 951060; 2 females, Jilin, Longtanshan, 21.VII.1995, Lou Juxian, No 961734, 961817; 1 female, Liaoning, Laotuding, 16.VII.2011, Song Shengnan, No 201103622; 1 female, Liaoning, Shenyang National Forest Park, 17.VII.2011, Yan Chengjin, No 201103536; 1 female, 1 male, Shaanxi, Qingling Tiantaishan, 4.IX.1999, Chen Xuexin, No 991284, 991260; 1 female, Shandong, Taian Taishan, 20.VII.1996, Xu Weian, No 971794; 1 female, Shanxi, Lishan Xiachuan, 26.VII.2012, Liu Zhen, No 201208949; 2 females, 1 male, Sichuan, Daofu Luhuo, 15.VIII.2013, Liu Zhen, No 201407162, 201407194, 201407175; 1 female, 7 males, Xizang, Cangdu, 3.VII.2013, Liuzhen, No 201403810, 201403771, 201403763, 201403761, 201403800, 201403813, 201403826, 201403743; 1 female, Xizang, Naqu Naixian, 31.VII.2013, Liu Zhen, No 201408816; 1 female, Xizang, Xiayadong, 19.VII.2013, Liu Zhen, No 201400797; 2 females, Yunnan, Lvchun Fenshuiling, 25.VII.2003, Jiang Qian, No 20045747, 20045735; 7 females, 1 male, Yunnan, Maguan Bazhaizhen, VI.2018, Malaise trap, No 201806816, 201806817, 201806869, 201807092, 201806620, 201807063,201806907,201806709; 7females, Yunnan, Maguan Bojiaozhen, 3.IX.2017, Malaise trap, No 201807423, 201807278, 201807264, 201807253, 201807216, 201807336, 201807344; 3 females, Yunnan, Xishuangbanna, VI.2018, Malaise trap, No 201806432, 201806522, 201806040; 2 females, 1 male, Zhejiang, Anjishan, 21.VII.1995, Wu Hong, No 971279, 971564, 971081; 1 female, Zhejiang, Fengyangshan, 10.VIII.2003, 1650m, Dai Wu, No 20058438; 1 female, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, 8.VII.2010, Dong Shuai; 1 female, Zhejiang, Linan Longtangshan, 29. V.2012, Tang Pu, No 201204821; 2females, Zhejiang, Lishui Fengyangshan, 9.VII.2003, Wu Qiong, No 200042330, 20042260; 1 female, Zhejiang, Lishui Fengyangshan, 27.VII.2007, Liu Jingxian, No 201801007; 1 female, Zhejiang, Longquan Fengyangshan, 7.VIII.2003, Liu Jingxian, No 20055719; 1 female, Zhejiang, Lishui Fengyangshan, 8.VIII.2003, 1933m, Ma Yun, No 20041444; 1 female, Zhejiang, Qingyuan Baishanzu, 13.VII.2003, 1856m, Yu Xiaoxia, No 20058545; 1 female, Zhejiang, Qingyuan Baishanzu, 18.VII.1994, Wu Hong, No 946822; 1 female, Zhejiang, Songyang, 18. V.1993, Chen Hanlin, No 964783; 4 females, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 1. V.1999, Zhao Mingshui, No 20002476, 20002469, 20002491, 20002097; 1 female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 13. VI.1998, Chen Xuexin, No 980664; 6 females, 1 male, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 25���27.VII.2011, Song Shengnan, No 201102373, 201102344, 201102350, 201102260, 201102062, 201101486, 201101552, 201101542; 8 females, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 1.VII.2001, Piao Meihua, 1520m, No 200105911, 200105632, 200105828, 200105240, 200105839, 200105456, 200105240, 200105839; 2 males, Zhejiang, Tianmushan Bingchuandashi, 28.VII.2011, Liu Zhen, No 201101581, 201101578; 4 females, 1 male, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 27.VII.2011, Liu Zhen, No 201101363, 201101345, 201101354, 20110183, 201102479; 22 females, 18 males, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 20���21.VII.1987, Lou Xiaoming, No 873913, 873909, 873907, 873906, 873888, 873868, 873858, 873862, 873863, 873864, 873838, 873806, 873636, 873652, 873790, 873887, 873885, 873878, 873876, 873870, 873895, 873875, 873916, 873914, 874386, 874378, 874340, 874337, 874143, 874108, 874153, 874158, 874302, 874319, 874320, 874321, 874323, 874332, 874333, 874335; 1 female, 2 males, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 2.IX.1987, Wang Beigeng, No 876455, 876630, 876594; 4 females, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 13. VI.1983, Ma Yun, No 830898, 830883, 830877, 830858; 1 female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 23. VI.1984, No 841886; 1 female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 17. V.1988, He Junhua, No 881073; 52 females, 15 males, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, VI.1984 ��� VI.1989, Chen Xuexin, No 872306, 877127, 872776, 878576, 872774, 872769, 872578, 872453, 872473, 872571, 830898, 830883, 830858, 830877, 876594, 876630, 872604, 872601, 877246, 877181, 872420, 872427, 872747, 872741, 872718, 872765, 872762, 872759, 872757, 872729, 972719, 872703, 872413, 872626, 873364, 872998, 873000, 873004, 873308, 872608, 872588, 872572, 872707, 872724, 872406, 872787, 872790, 872992, 872349, 873391, 873395, 842305, 842296, 872632, 873322, 873433, 873422, 845627, 873374, 873404, 873413, 873412, 873419, 891250, 891357, 891705, 891686, 891690, 891758, 882070, 882074, 882067, 891672; 1 female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 28.VII.2003, Chen Xuexin, No 20038983; 5 females, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, V.1988 ��� VI.1990, He Junhua, No 881072, 904410, 890337, 890341, 890349; 1 female, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 11. VI.1993, Chen Xuexin, No 934921; 2 females, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, 25.VII.2011, No 201500541, 201501021; 4 females, Zhejiang, Tianmushan, VI.1989, No 892788, 892817, 892764, 892749; 62 females, 11 males, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, V.1995 ��� VIII.1999, Zhao Mingshui, No 997178, 997183, 997023, 997142, 200010898, 992589, 994017, 994010, 994086, 994108, 994057, 992093, 992094, 992091, 995677, 994357, 995352, 992053, 992064, 996756, 992427, 992357, 995415, 992029, 992038, 992042, 992060, 992057, 992106, 992108, 20000792, 994039, 995403, 995735, 995380, 995381, 995409, 995431, 995546, 995553, 995560, 995563, 995784, 995565, 995564, 995573, 995574, 995577, 995670, 995674, 995354, 995776, 995791, 995793, 995795, 995801, 995828, 995707, 995705, 995683, 995699, 995681, 995691, 995679, 995697, 995722, 995718, 995726, 995729, 997149, 997167, 997157, 20003465; 3 females, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, 18.VIII.1999, Ma Yun, No 997472, 997450, 997363; 1 female, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, 27.IV.1999, Zhao Mingshui, No 999634; 1 female, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, 30.VII.2003, Wu Qiong, No 20040770; 1 female, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, 27.VII.2003, Yu Xiaoxia, No 20038279; 1 female, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, 18.VIII.1999, Yang Yafen, No 997713; 1 female, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, 3.VII.2000, Li Weidi, No 200010417; 1female, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, 30.VII.2003, Shi Min, No 20040656; 9 females, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, 17. V.1999, Fan Jinjiang, No 884261, 884248, 884282, 882245, 884247, 884240, 884256, 884311, 884087; 2 females, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, 29.VII.1984, Guan Xiaojing, No 844465, 844334; 1 female, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, 6. VI.1989, Wang Beigeng, No 892783; 7 females, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, VI.1990, Lou Yonggen, No 900099, 900693, 900733, 900861, 900407, 900423, 900402; 5 females, 1 male, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, 17. V.1988, Xu Weiliang, No 885647, 885742, 885872, 885628, 885919, 885578; 2 females, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, 18.VI.1983, 2.VI.1990, Shi Zuhua, No 901859, 830420; 7 females, 2 males, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, 17. V.1988, Lou Xiaoming, No 883126, 883116, 883104, 883131, 883141, 883660, 883662, 892421, 892426; 3 females, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, 2���4. VI.1990, Wang Beigeng, No 903274, 903161, 903270; 5 females, 4 males, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, 16. V.1988, No 882803, 882796, 882755, 882791, 882962, 882739, 882721, 882899, 882666; 1 female, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, 2.VII.2000, Ma Yun, No 200103516; 3 females, Xitianmushan, 2. VI.1990, Hu Haijun, No 901107, 901065, 901240; 1 female, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, 6. VI.1989, No 894934; 1 female, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, 29.VII.1984, Qian Ying, No 842965; 1 female, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, 10.IX.1983, Xu Zhihong, No 833710; 1 male, Zhejiang, Xitianmushan, 30.VII.2003, Shi Min, No 20040719. Variation. Antenna with 32���35 flagellomeres; malar space 0.3���0.6�� basal width of mandible; interocellar distance (Fig. 8F) 1.4���1.7�� ocello-ocular distance and 1.6���2.0�� distance between median and lateral ocelli; mesopleuron (Fig. 8B) granulose to granulose-punctate; hind femur 5.0���5.4�� longer than wide; first tergite (Fig. 8H) 3.0���3.3�� longer than width of postpetiole; ovipositor sheath 1.7���2.1�� longer than hind femur; one specimen from Shenyang province with hind femur black. Distribution. China (Fujian, Guangdong, Guangxi, Guizhou, Henan, Hubei, Jilin, Liaoning, Shaanxi, Shandong, Shanxi, Sichuan, Taiwan, Xizang, Yunnan, Zhejiang); India, Myanmar, Nepal. Note. This species is reported from Taiwan (China) before, and this study indicated it is a widely distributed species in China., Published as part of Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van & Chen, Xue-Xin, 2021, The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China, pp. 1-121 in Zootaxa 5066 (1) on pages 16-18, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5653939, {"references":["Gupta, V. K. & Maheshwary, S. (1977) Ichneumonologia Orientalis, Part IV. The tribe Porizontini (= Campoplegini) (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Oriental Insects Monograph, 5, 1 - 267."]}

Campoplex apacicarinatus sp. nov. Figs. 11–12 Material examined. Holotype: female, Hubei, Shennongjia Qianjiaping, 21.V.2012, Shi Kai, No 201204457 (ZJUH). Description. Female (Fig. 11) holotype. Body length 5.8 mm, fore wing length 4.1 mm. Head. Antenna with 30 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.1× longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 12E) granulose. Clypeus (Fig. 12E) mat, slightly convex, apical margin slightly arched, thick medially. Malar space granulose, 0.45× basal width of mandible. Mandible with a very weak lamella, upper tooth slightly longer than lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 12F) 1.5× ocello-ocular distance and 1.8× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, mat, not swollen behind eyes. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina above mandible base. Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose dorsally, mat, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 12G) granulose, rugose in notaulic area anteriorly. Scutellum and metanotum granulose with scutellum rugose posteriorly. Mesopleuron (Fig. 12B) granulose, weakly trans-striate below tegula, speculum largely granulose, smooth and shiny medially. Metapleuron granulose. Propodeum (Fig. 12C) granulose; area basalis trapezoid; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, broadly and shallowly depressed, granulose; median and lateral longitudinal carinae obscure; propodeal spiracle small and oval. Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 12A) areolet present and with a short stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 2.0× longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (70°). Hind wing with nervellus inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.15. Legs. Hind femur 4.3× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.6× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate basally. Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 12H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, with dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove shallow. First tergite 2.6× longer than width of postpetiole. Postpetiole and second tergite granulose, mat. Second tergite 0.65× as long as first tergite, 1.1× longer than its apical width; thyridium round, its distance from basal margin of tergite equal to its diameter. Third tergite 0.7× as long as its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.4× longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 12D) gradually upcurved. Colour. Black. Mandible medially, palpi and tegula, yellowish brown; scape and pedicel blackish brown; fore and mid legs coxae and telotarsus brown, remainder of fore and mid legs yellowish brown; hind leg with coxa, trochanter, trochantellus, tibia extreme basally and apically, and tarsus brown, remainder of hind leg yellowish brown; metasoma entirely black. Distribution. China (Hubei). Comparative diagnosis. This species runs in the key by Maheshwary & Gupta (1977) to C. kamathi Gupta & Maheshwary, 1977, but differs from the latter by having face granulose, interocellar distance 1.5× ocello-ocular distance, medio-longitudinal carina obscure, median depressed area not striate, first metasomal segment with dorsolateral carina and lateral groove present, and body color different. Etymology. Name derived from “apacus” (Latin for “obscure”) and “carina” (Latin for “carina”), because its propodeal median and lateral longitudinal carinae are weakly developed.

Campoplex maurotrochanter sp. nov. Figs. 47���48 Material examined. Holotype: 1 female, Shaanxi, Ningshan Xunyangzhen, 6.VI.1998, Ma Yun, No 982824 (ZJUH). Paratypes: 1 female, Gansu, Wenxian Dianba, 16. VI. 1998, 900m, Ma Yun, No 982279; 1 female, Hebei, Zhangbei, 1981, Dai Junrong, No 820163; 1 female, Shaanxi, Huoditang Huodigou, 5. VI.1998, 1900m, Ma Yun, No 982683; 1 female, 1 male, Shaanxi, Qingling, 10. VI.1998, 1800m, Ma Yun, No 983990, 983977; 1 female, Shaanxi, Zhashui Niubeiliang, 15.VIII.2003, Tan Jiangli, No 201306781. Description. Female (Fig. 47) holotype. Body length 4.3 mm, fore wing length 3.4 mm. Head. Antenna with 27 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.25�� longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 48E) granulose. Clypeus (Fig. 48E) granulose, slightly convex, apical margin arched and blunt. Malar space granulose, 0.7�� basal width of mandible. Mandible with a very weak lamella basally, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 48F) 1.3�� ocelloocular distance and 1.8�� distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, subpolished, not swollen behind eyes. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina above mandible base. Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose dorsally, subpolished, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 48G) granulose, notauli indistinct. Scutellum granulose with sparse and minute punctures. Metanotum granulose-punctate. Mesopleuron (Fig. 48B) granulose-punctate, weakly trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Metapleuron (Fig. 48B) granulose-punctate. Propodeum (Fig. 48C) with area basalis triangular, long and narrow; area superomedia finely granulose, subpolished; area petiolaris coarsely rugose; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, not depressed; all carina distinctly developed; propodeal spiracle small and round. Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 48A) areolet present and with a short stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 2.0�� longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (70��). Hind wing with nervellus inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.3. Legs. Hind femur 5.0�� longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.5�� as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws nearly not pectinate, teeth very weak. Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 48H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, without dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove. First tergite 3.0�� longer than width of postpetiole. Second tergite 0.7�� as long as first tergite, 1.2�� longer than its apical width; thyridium round, its distance from basal margin of tergite 1.5�� its diameter. Third tergite 0.9�� as long as its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations medially. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.4�� longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 48D) gradually upcurved. Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth, palpi, yellowish brown; scape and pedicel blackish brown; tegula whitish; all trochantellus yellow; fore leg from trochantellus on yellowish brown, coxa, trochanter and apical tarsus blackish brown; mid leg with coxa, trochanter and femur ventrally blackish brown, femur dorsally and tibia medially yellowish brown, tibia basally and apically and tarsus brown; hind coxa, trochanter, and femur black, tibia yellowish brown medially, tibia basally and apically, and tarsus brown; metasoma entirely black. Variation. Hind wing with nervellus intercepted at lower 0.3 or only slightly below middle; the specimen from Hebei province with metasoma from third tergite on not compressed. Male. The surface of body shinier than in female; propodeal carina stronger than in female; otherwise quite similar to female. Distribution. China (Gansu, Hebei, Shaanxi). Comparative diagnosis. This species runs in the key by Maheshwary & Gupta (1977) to C. kalatopensis Gupta & Maheshwary, 1977, but differs from the latter by having malar space 0.5�� basal width of mandible, mesopleuron granulose-punctate and with punctures dense, area petiolaris coarsely rugose, and fore and mid trochanters blackish brown. Etymology. Name derived from ���mauros��� (Latin for ���dark���) and ���trochanter��� (Latin for ���trochanter���), because all its trochanters are black., Published as part of Han, Yuan-Yuan, Achterberg, Kees Van & Chen, Xue-Xin, 2021, The genus Campoplex Gravenhorst, 1829 (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Campopleginae) from China, pp. 1-121 in Zootaxa 5066 (1) on pages 69-72, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/5653939, {"references":["Gupta, V. K. & Maheshwary, S. (1977) Ichneumonologia Orientalis, Part IV. The tribe Porizontini (= Campoplegini) (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Oriental Insects Monograph, 5, 1 - 267."]}

Campoplex shanxiensis sp. nov. Figs. 73–74 Material examined. Holotype: female, Shanxi, Taigu, 20.I.1984, Zeng Kecheng, host: Telphusa chloroderces, No 840930 (ZJUH). Paratype: 1 female, Shanxi, Taigu, 3.VIII.1983, Zeng Kecheng, host: Adoxophyes orana, No 850112. Description. Female (Fig. 73) holotype. Body length 5.3 mm, fore wing length 3.8 mm. Head. Antenna with at least 25 flagellomeres (apical segments missing); first flagellomere 1.3× longer than second flagellomere. Face (Fig. 74E) granulose. Clypeus (Fig. 74E) granulose and mat medially, with minute punctures, slightly convex, apical margin truncate, slightly thick medially. Malar space granulose, 0.6× basal width of mandible. Mandible without lamella, upper tooth equal to lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance (Fig. 74F) 1.7× ocello-ocular distance and 1.5× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, subpolished, not immediately receding after eye. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina at mandible base. Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose-punctate dorsally, subpolished, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum (Fig. 74G) granulose punctate. Scutellum punctate. Metanotum finely granulose. Mesopleuron (Fig. 74B) punctate, punctures denser ventrally, trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Metapleuron (Fig. 74B) punctate, punctures sparser than that on mesopleuron. Propodeum (Fig. 74C) with area basalis triangular; area superomedia nearly smooth and shiny, weakly granulose; area petiolaris strongly rugose; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, not depressed; all carina distinctly developed; propodeal spiracle small and oval. Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 74A) areolet present and with a short stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 1.6× longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (75°). Hind wing with nervellus inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.3 of its length. Legs. Hind femur 4.6× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.5× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate. Metasoma. First metasomal segment (Fig. 74H) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, without dorso-lateral carina and lateral groove. First tergite 2.4× longer than width of postpetiole. Postpetiole and second tergite granulose, mat. Second tergite 0.6× as long as first tergite, equal to its apical width; thyridium round, its distance from basal margin of tergite equal to its diameter. Third tergite 0.6× as long as its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.3× longer than hind femur, ovipositor (Fig. 74D) gradually upcurved. Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth, palpi and tegula, yellowish brown; scape and pedicel blackish brown; pterostigma whitish basally; fore coxa, trochanter, trochantellus and telotarsus brown, remainder of fore leg yellowish brown; mid coxa, trochanter, base of trochantellus, base of femur, tibia ventrally and telotarsus brown, tibia dorsally whitish yellow, remainder of mid leg yellowish brown; hind coxa, trochanter, trochantellus and base of femur, brownish, tibia clearly banded with base and apex blackish brown, whitish yellow medially, tarsus blackish brown; metasoma black with apical tergites somewhat blackish brown. Distribution. China (Shanxi). Comparative diagnosis. This species runs in the key by Maheshwary & Gupta (1977) to C. phthorimaeae (Cushman, 1915), but differs from the latter by having mesosoma subpolished, hind femur yellowish brown except brownish basally, metasoma entirely black with apical tergites somewhat blackish brown, and area superomedia not as wide as area petiolaris. Etymology. Name derived from the name of type locality of species.