Search

Background: Use of 3-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) preoperative planning and patient-specific instrumentation has been demonstrated to improve the accuracy of glenoid implant placement in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of glenoid implant placement in primary TSA among different types of instrumentation used with the 3D CT preoperative planning.Methods: One hundred and seventy-three patients with end-stage glenohumeral arthritis were enrolled in 3 prospective studies evaluating patient-specific instrumentation and 3D preoperative planning. All patients underwent preoperative 3D CT planning to determine optimal glenoid component and guide pin position based on surgeon preference. Patients were placed into 1 of 5 instrument groups used for intraoperative guide pin placement: (1) standard instrumentation, (2) standard instrumentation combined with use of a 3D glenoid bone model containing the guide pin, (3) use of the 3D glenoid bone model combined with single-use patient-specific instrumentation, (4) use of the 3D glenoid bone model combined with reusable patient-specific instrumentation, and (5) use of reusable patient-specific instrumentation with an adjustable, reusable base. Postoperatively, all patients underwent 3D CT to compare actual versus planned glenoid component position. Deviation from the plan (in terms of orientation and location) was compared across groups on the basis of absolute differences and outlier analysis. Univariable and multivariable comparisons were performed. As the initial analyses showed no significant differences in preoperative factors or in deviation from the plan between Groups 1 and 2 or between Groups 4 and 5 across studies, the final analysis was across 3 major treatment groups: standard instrumentation (Groups 1 and 2), single-use patient-specific instrumentation (Group 3), and reusable patient-specific instrumentation (Groups 4 and 5).Results: In nearly all comparisons, there were no significant differences in the deviation from the plan (absolute differences or outlier frequency) for glenoid implant orientation or location across the 3 major treatment groups.Conclusions: This study did not demonstrate that any type of patient-specific instrumentation resulted in consistent differences in accuracy of glenoid implant placement in primary TSA with 3D CT preoperative planning. Surgeons have multiple patient-specific instrumentation options available for improving accuracy of glenoid implant placement when compared with 2D imaging without patient-specific instrumentation.Level Of Evidence: Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Glenoid morphology and rotator cuff muscle quality are important anatomic factors that can impact longevity of the glenoid component following total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). We hypothesized that rotator cuff muscle fatty infiltration is associated with increased pathologic glenoid bone loss in glenohumeral osteoarthritis (OA).Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 190 preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans of 175 patients (mean age, 66 years; range, 44 to 90 years) who underwent TSA for the treatment of primary glenohumeral OA. Two-dimensional orthogonal CT images were reformatted in the plane of the scapula from 3-dimensional images. Pathologic joint-line medialization was defined with use of the glenoid vault model. Pathologic glenoid version was measured directly. Glenoid morphology was graded according to a modified Walch classification (subtypes A1, A2, B1, B2, B3, C1, and C2). Rotator cuff muscle fatty infiltration was assessed and assigned a Goutallier score on the sagittal CT slice just medial to the spinoglenoid notch for each muscle.Results: There was a significant difference in the Goutallier score for the supraspinatus, infraspinatus, and teres minor muscles between Walch subtypes (p ≤ 0.05). High-grade posterior rotator cuff muscle fatty infiltration was present in 55% (21) of 38 B3 glenoids compared with 8% (3) of 39 A1 glenoids. Increasing joint-line medialization was associated with increasing fatty infiltration of all rotator cuff muscles (p ≤ 0.05). Higher fatty infiltration of the infraspinatus, teres minor, and combined posterior rotator cuff muscles was associated with increasing glenoid retroversion (p ≤ 0.05). After controlling for joint-line medialization and retroversion, B3 glenoids were more likely to have fatty infiltration of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus muscles than B2 glenoids were.Conclusions: High-grade rotator cuff muscle fatty infiltration is associated with B3 glenoids, increased pathologic glenoid retroversion, and increased joint-line medialization. Additional studies are needed to determine the causal relationship between these muscle changes and glenoid wear, whether these muscle changes independently affect clinical and radiographic outcomes in anatomic TSA, and whether fatty infiltration can improve postoperatively with correction of pathologic version and/or joint-line restoration.Clinical Relevance: This study investigates the association between different patterns of glenoid bone loss and rotator cuff muscle fatty infiltration. Both factors have been shown to affect clinical outcome following TSA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Arthritic changes to glenoid morphology can be difficult to fully characterize on both plain radiographs and conventional two-dimensional computer tomography images. We tested the hypothesis that three-dimensional imaging of the shoulder would increase inter-rater agreement for assessing the extent and location of glenoid bone loss and also would improve surgical planning for total shoulder arthroplasty. Methods: Four shoulder surgeons independently and retrospectively reviewed the preoperative computed tomography scans of twenty-four arthritic shoulders. The blinded images were evaluated with conventional two-dimensional imaging software and then later with novel three-dimensional imaging software. Measurements and preoperative judgments were made for each shoulder with use of each imaging modality and then were compared. The glenoid measurements were glenoid version and bone loss. The judgments were the zone of maximum glenoid bone loss, glenoid implant fit within the glenoid vault, and how to surgically address abnormal glenoid version and bone loss. Agreement between observers was evaluated with use of intraclass correlation coefficients and the weighted kappa coefficient (K), and we determined if surgical decisions changed with use of the three-dimensional data. Results: The average glenoid version (and standard deviation) measured - 17° ± 2.2° on the two-dimensional images and -19° ± 2.4° on the three-dimensional images (p < 0.05). The average posterior glenoid bone loss measured 9 ± 2.3 mm on the two-dimensional images and 7 ± 2 mm on the three-dimensional images (p < 0.05). The average anterior bone loss measured 1 mm on both the two-dimensional and the three-dimensional images. However, the intraclass correlation coefficients for anterior bone loss increased significantly with use of the three-dimensional data (from 0.36 to 0.70; p < 0.05). Observers were more likely to locate mid-anterior glenoid bone loss on the basis of the three-dimensional data (p < 0.05). The use of three-dimensional data provided greater agreement among observers with regard to the zone of glenoid bone loss, glenoid prosthetic fit, and surgical decision-making. Also, when the judgment of implant fit changed, observers more often determined that it would violate the vault walls on the basis of the three-dimensional data (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The use of three-dimensional imaging can increase inter-rater agreement for the analysis of glenoid morphology and preoperative planning. Important considerations such as the extent and location of glenoid bone loss and the likelihood of implant fit were influenced by the three-dimensional data. Clinical Relevance: We believe that these data support the concept that three-dimensional imaging techniques applied to the shoulder provide further information that may be useful to the surgeon during the planning of total shoulder arthroplasty. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]