Search

Background: The objectives of this study were to address the following questions regarding previous non-arthroplasty surgery prior to primary anatomic shoulder arthroplasty (either total shoulder arthroplasty [TSA] or ream-and-run arthroplasty): (1) To what degree is primary anatomic shoulder arthroplasty after prior non-arthroplasty surgery associated with inferior clinical outcomes and higher revision rates compared with arthroplasty without previous surgery? (2) Does type, approach, or timing of previous surgery affect outcomes after anatomic arthroplasty?, Methods: A retrospective review of a primary shoulder arthroplasty database was performed and identified 640 patients undergoing anatomic shoulder arthroplasty (345 TSAs and 295 ream-and-run arthroplasties). Of these patients, 183 (29%) underwent previous non-arthroplasty surgery. Baseline and demographic information, 2-year postoperative outcome scores, and revision surgical procedures with associated culture results were collected., Results: In patients undergoing TSA, previous non-arthroplasty surgery was associated with a significantly lower 2-year Simple Shoulder Test (SST) score (P = .010), percentage maximum possible improvement (MPI) (P = .024), and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score (P < .001) and a higher rate of reoperation (P < .001). In patients undergoing ream-and-run arthroplasty, previous non-arthroplasty surgery was associated with a nonsignificantly lower 2-year SST score, percentage MPI, and SANE score and higher reoperation rate. Prior fracture surgery carried a higher risk of reoperation than other types of surgery including rotator cuff repair and instability surgery. Among TSA and ream-and-run arthroplasty cases with prior non-arthroplasty surgery, prior open surgery and the time interval from most recent surgery were associated with nonsignificant differences in the 2-year SST score, percentage MPI, SANE score, and revision risk., Conclusion: Previous surgery is associated with inferior clinical outcomes and higher revision rates in patients undergoing index TSA but not in those undergoing the ream-and-run procedure. Patients with previous fracture surgery carry the highest risk of reoperation., (Copyright © 2020 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Shoulder periprosthetic infections are predominantly caused by bacteria residing in the skin of healthy individuals. Knowledge of the factors associated with the loads of the different cutaneous bacteria in individuals having shoulder arthroplasty may help identify patients at higher risk of periprosthetic infection and help guide preventive measures. For this reason, we tested the hypothesis that easy-to-obtain preoperative characteristics were significantly associated with the cutaneous microbiology and the loads of specific bacteria in shoulders having joint replacement., Methods: This study identified the microbiology of the unprepared epidermal skin surface and of the dermal edge freshly incised at surgery in 332 patients having primary shoulder arthroplasty. The load of bacteria in each sample was characterized as a value based on the laboratory report: 0 for "no growth"; 0.1 for "one colony only" or for "broth only"; and 1, 2, 3, and 4 for 1+, 2+, 3+, and 4+ growth, respectively. The relationships between preoperative patient characteristics and these semiquantitative results of the cutaneous cultures were analyzed., Results: Cultures of the unprepared epidermal skin surface showed positive results for a wide variety of organisms, including Cutibacterium in 72%, coagulase-negative Staphylococcus in 61%, and a spectrum of other organisms in 32%. By contrast, cultures of the freshly incised dermal edge showed a great preponderance of Cutibacterium (34%) in comparison to low levels of coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (8%) and other organisms (2%). An increased dermal load of Cutibacterium was significantly associated with male sex, younger patient age, American Society of Anesthesiologists class 1, use of testosterone supplements, prior shoulder surgery, and higher Cutibacterium loads on the unprepared skin surface., Conclusions: Although the microbiology of the unprepared skin surface is diverse, the same is not true for the freshly incised dermis, where Cutibacterium is the predominant organism. Readily available preoperative patient characteristics are significantly associated with the load of Cutibacterium in the incised dermis. Preoperative cultures of the unprepared skin surface appear to be a new method for predicting the type and load of bacteria found in the freshly incised dermis at the time of surgery. Additional studies are needed to determine whether preoperative cultures of the unprepared epidermal skin surface can provide a method for identifying patients at increased risk of shoulder periprosthetic infections., (Copyright © 2020 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Cutibacterium are the most common cause of periprosthetic shoulder infections, as defined by ≥2 deep cultures. Established Cutibacterium periprosthetic infections cannot be resolved without prosthesis removal. However, the decision for implant removal must be made from an assessment of infection risk before the results of intraoperative cultures are finalized. We hypothesized that the risk for a Cutibacterium infection is associated with characteristics that are available at the time of revision arthroplasty., Methods: In a retrospective review of 342 patients having prosthetic revisions between 2006 and 2018 for whom definitive deep culture results were available, we used univariate and multivariate analyses to compare the preoperative and intraoperative characteristics of 101 revisions with Cutibacterium periprosthetic infections to the characteristics of 241 concurrent revisions not meeting the definition of infection., Results: Patients with definite Cutibacterium periprosthetic infections were younger (59 ± 10 vs. 64 ± 12, P < .001), were more likely to be male (91% vs. 44%, P < .001), were more likely to have had their index procedure performed for primary osteoarthritis (54% vs. 39%, P = .007), were more likely to be taking testosterone supplements (8% vs. 2%, P = .02), had lower American Society of Anesthesiologists scores (1.9 ± 0.7 vs. 2.3 ± 0.7, P < .001), and had lower body mass indices (29 ± 5 vs. 31 ± 7, P = .005). Patients with definite Cutibacterium periprosthetic infections also had significantly higher preoperative loads of Cutibacterium on their unprepared skin surface (1.7 ± 0.9 vs. 0.4 ± 0.8, P < .001) and were more likely to have the surgical finding of synovitis (41% vs. 16%, P < .001)., Conclusions: The risk of definite Cutibacterium periprosthetic infections is associated with observations that can be made before or at the time of revision arthroplasty., (Copyright © 2019 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Author transparency in disclosing potential conflicts of interest when reporting outcomes for shoulder arthroplasty implants is important. Using the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Open Payments Program (OPP) database, we analyzed articles in the Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery to evaluate (1) discrepancies between the stated conflicts of interest and associated payments recorded in the database, (2) the magnitude and types of payments received, and (3) possible relationships between industry financial support and positive study outcomes., Methods: Articles reporting clinical outcomes of shoulder arthroplasty from 2016 and 2017 were reviewed. Articles identifying a specific shoulder arthroplasty implant and having at least 1 author based in the United States were included. Payment types, amounts, and sources were extracted from disclosure statements in the manuscript and considered relevant if they were received from the implant manufacturer. Published disclosure statements were compared against the OPP database. Study outcomes demonstrating a clinical benefit were considered "positive." Payments to authors reporting positive outcomes were compared with those reporting nonpositive outcomes., Results: Implant manufacturers provided $16,051,261 to authors of shoulder arthroplasty publications over a 2-year period. Approximately half of senior authors (46%) received royalty payments, more than 90% of which ($14,910,873; 93%) were reported in disclosure statements. Although authors of articles with positive outcomes received greater payments than those reporting nonpositive outcomes, these differences were not statistically significant., Conclusion: The majority of author disclosure statements accurately reflected the OPP data. Payments were not significantly associated with positive outcomes reported for the specific implant., (Copyright © 2019 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate humeral stress shielding in shoulder arthroplasties performed with a smooth, standard-length humeral stem fixed with impaction autografting., Methods: Two-year outcomes were evaluated for 48 ream-and-run arthroplasties and 78 total shoulder arthroplasties (TSAs) performed at a single institution. Postoperative radiographs were analyzed for adaptive changes, calcar osteolysis, and component shift or subsidence. Radiographic outcomes were analyzed for associations with patient demographic characteristics, humeral stem filling ratios, and glenoid loosening; clinical outcomes were assessed using the Simple Shoulder Test., Results: At 2 years after surgery, the ream-and-run procedures showed partial calcar osteolysis in 9 cases (19%). The TSAs showed partial calcar osteolysis in 19 cases (24%) and complete calcar osteolysis in 2 (3%). Humeral component subsidence or component shift was observed in 3 ream-and-run procedures (6%) and in 8 TSAs (10%). These radiographic findings were not significantly associated with patient demographic characteristics, canal-filling ratios, or clinical outcomes., Conclusion: When inserted with impaction autografting, a smooth, standard-length humeral stem offers a secure bone-preserving approach for humeral component fixation in shoulder arthroplasty. These results with a conventional prosthesis can serve as a basis for comparison for new component designs and fixation methods., (Copyright © 2019 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Clinical shoulder science lacks a benchmark against which the early clinical value of new glenoid components can be compared; such a benchmark may be derived from a multicenter study of patients receiving an established, internationally used design of glenoid component., Methods: We obtained data from 11 centers on 1270 patients having total shoulder arthroplasty using an all-polyethylene component with a fluted central peg. We analyzed individual patient outcomes at 1 and 2 years after surgery. We compared the improvement for each patient to the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and calculated each patient's improvement as a percent of maximal possible improvement (MPI)., Results: The preoperative scores improved from SST 3 ± 2, ASES 37 ± 15, Constant score 36 ± 16, and Penn score 30 ± 19 to SST 10 ± 2, ASES 90 ± 12, Constant 76 ± 13, and Penn 80 ± 24 (p < 0.001 for each). A high percentage of patients improved by more than the MCID (SST 96%, ASES 98%, Constant 94%, Penn 93%) and obtained improvement of at least 30% of the MPI (SST 95%, ASES 98%, Constant 91%, Penn 87%). The clinical outcomes realized with this glenoid design were not worse for the 41% of shoulders with preoperative type B glenoids or for the 30% of shoulders with more than 15 degrees of glenoid retroversion., Conclusions: Individual patients from 11 international practices having total shoulder arthroplasty using a basic glenoid component design obtained highly significant clinical outcomes, providing a benchmark against which the early outcomes of new designs can be compared to determine whether they provide increased clinical value.

Background: Most of the literature on shoulder arthroplasty failure comes from high-volume centers. These reports tend to exclude the experience of community orthopedic surgeons, who perform most of the shoulder joint replacements., Methods: We analyzed the failure reports mandated by the US Food and Drug Administration for all hospitals. Each reported event from 2012 to 2016 was characterized by implant, failure mode, and year of surgery., Results: For the 1673 anatomic arthroplasties, the most common failure modes were glenoid component failure (20.4%), rotator cuff/subscapularis tear (15.4%), pain/stiffness (12.9%), dislocation/instability (11.8%), infection (9%), and humeral component loosening (5.1%). For the 2390 reverse arthroplasties, the most common failure modes were dislocation/instability (32%), infection (13.8%), glenosphere-baseplate dissociation (12.2%), failed/loosened baseplate (10.4%), humeral component dissociation/tray fracture (5.5%), difficulty inserting the baseplate (4.8%), and difficulty inserting the glenosphere (4.2%). Although the percentage distribution among the different failure modes was relatively consistent over the years of this study, the percentage distribution of these failure modes differed substantially among different implant manufacturers., Conclusions: The Food and Drug Administration database reveals modes of shoulder arthroplasty failure that are not emphasized in the published literature, such as rotator cuff tear, infection, and postoperative pain/stiffness for anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty and implant dissociation and baseplate failure for reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Knowledge of these failure modes may help inform surgical technique and implant design in ways that will lower the risk of implant failure in the future., (Copyright © 2018 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: A patient with arthritis usually experiences the progression of symptoms over time. At some stage, the patient may decide that the symptoms have reached a level of severity that leads him or her to elect to proceed with joint replacement; we refer to this degree of symptom severity as the "tipping point." Our goal was to study the factors that influenced the tipping point for patients undergoing elective shoulder arthroplasty., Methods: We analyzed the characteristics of 931 patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty to determine the factors affecting the tipping point as characterized by the patients' comfort and function at the time they determined their symptoms had progressed to the point when this elective surgery was merited., Results: The preoperative Simple Shoulder Test (SST) score for all patients averaged 3.6 ± 2.7. The average tipping points were different for the ream-and-run procedure (mean SST score, 5.0 ± 2.5), hemiarthroplasty (mean SST score, 3.1 ± 3.3), total shoulder arthroplasty (mean SST score, 3.0 ± 2.4), cuff tear arthropathy arthroplasty (mean SST score, 2.8 ± 2.5), and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (mean SST score, 1.5 ± 1.8). A number of other factors were significantly associated with a higher tipping point: younger age, better health, male sex, commercial insurance, married, nonuse of narcotics, use of alcohol, and shoulder problem not related to work., Conclusions: Analysis of the tipping point-the patients' self-assessed comfort and function at the point they decide to undergo shoulder joint replacement-provides a means by which surgeons can understand the factors influencing the indications for these procedures., (Copyright © 2018 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Propionibacterium-specific cultures are commonly positive in revised shoulders without obvious signs of infection. To help identify patients at risk for these "stealth" presentations of positive Propionibacterium cultures, we assessed the value of a preoperative skin culture in predicting the results of deep cultures obtained at the time of revision shoulder arthroplasty in patients without clinical evidence of infection., Methods: The study enrolled 60 patients undergoing revision for a prior shoulder arthroplasty without clinical evidence of infection. A preoperative culture of the skin surface was taken before skin preparation. At surgery, multiple (mean 5.9 ± standard deviation 1.6) deep tissue and explant cultures were harvested from the shoulder. Each culture was semiquantitatively reported as the specimen Propionibacterium value (SpPV). All SpPVs from the deep specimens from each patient were summed as the total shoulder Propionibacterium score (ShPS). The averaged ShPS was the total ShPS divided by the number of deep specimens harvested., Results: A multivariate analysis demonstrated that the preoperative skin SpPV was predictive of the Propionibacterium load in the revised shoulders as indicated by the total ShPS (P = .004) and averaged ShPS (P = .003)., Conclusions: In this series of patients, a preoperative culture of the unprepared skin was strongly predictive of the Propionibacterium load in revised shoulder arthroplasties without clinical evidence of infection. This result suggests that the results of skin cultures taken before revision surgery may help inform operative management with respect to the need for prosthesis exchange and extended postoperative antibiotic treatment., (Copyright © 2018 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The ream-and-run procedure can provide improvement in shoulder function and comfort for selected patients with primary glenohumeral arthritis who wish to avoid a prosthetic glenoid component. The purpose of this study was to evaluate factors associated with medialization of the humeral head after this procedure as well as the relationship of medialization to the clinical outcome., Methods: We collected patient, shoulder, and procedure characteristics along with Simple Shoulder Test (SST) scores before surgery and at the time of follow-up. Medialization was determined by comparing the position of the humeral head prosthesis in relation to the scapula on postoperative baseline radiographs made within 6 weeks after surgery with that on comparable follow-up radiographs made ≥18 months after surgery., Results: Two-year clinical outcomes were available for 101 patients (95% were male). Comparable radiographs at postoperative baseline and follow-up evaluations were available for 50 shoulders. For all patients, the mean SST score (and standard deviation) increased from 4.9 ± 2.8 preoperatively to 10.3 ± 2.4 at the latest follow-up (p < 0.001). Significant clinical improvement was observed for glenoid types A2 and B2. Shoulders with a type-A2 glenoid morphology, with larger preoperative scapular body-glenoid angles, and with lower preoperative SST scores, were associated with the greatest clinical improvement. Clinical outcome was not significantly associated with the amount of medialization., Conclusions: The ream-and-run procedure can be an effective treatment for advanced primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis in active patients. Further study will be necessary to determine whether medialization affects the clinical outcome with follow-up of >2 years., Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Purpose: Have the results of shoulder arthroplasty got better over the last two decades? To answer this question, we sought published evidence that the patient-reported outcomes and re-operation rates have improved in reports of more recently performed anatomic (TSA) and reverse (RSA) total shoulder arthroplasties., Methods: We analyzed the arthroplasty results among studies published from 1990 to 2015, adjusting for the fact that the different publications presented patient groups with different combinations of diagnoses, used various outcome scales, and had different lengths of follow-up., Results: The adjusted clinical outcomes (p = 0.048), but not the revision rates (p = 0.3), were significantly better for articles reporting more recent TSA procedures. Neither the clinical outcomes (p = 0.9) nor the revision rates (p = 0.4) were significantly better in articles reporting more recent RSA surgeries., Conclusions: Better evidence from reports with greater detail will be necessary to show that patients are realizing progressively better outcomes from shoulder arthroplasty., Level of Evidence: Level IV.

Background: When fixed with bone ingrowth, a tight diaphyseal press fit, or cement, the humeral component of a shoulder arthroplasty may present problems of malposition, stress shielding, or periprosthetic fracture or difficulty with removal at revision arthroplasty. We have avoided the need for these fixation methods by using impaction cancellous autografting of the humeral stem, minimizing contact between the prosthetic stem and the humeral cortex. This study presents the radiographic survivorship of impaction-autografted humeral implants using component subsidence as the primary endpoint., Methods: We reviewed 286 primary anatomic shoulder arthroplasties having an average follow-up of 4.9 ± 2.7 years. Initial postoperative radiographs and minimum 2-year follow-up radiographs were evaluated by 3 observers to assess subsidence., Results: Two different implants (Humeral Replacement Prosthesis [HRP] and Global Advantage prosthesis) were used. Of 286 stems, 267 (93.4%) had not subsided. The Global Advantage prosthesis had a subsidence-free survival rate of 98.5% at 5 years. The stiffer-stemmed HRP used early during the study had a higher rate of subsidence compared with the currently used Global Advantage stem (hazard ratio, 5.6; P = .001). Radiolucent lines of 2 mm or greater were less common for the Global Advantage prosthesis than for the HRP in each of 7 zones (P < .001). Total shoulder arthroplasty was associated with a higher rate of subsidence compared with hemiarthroplasty (hazard ratio, 2.6; P = .12)., Conclusions: Impaction autografting provides a secure, durable, bone-preserving means of humeral component fixation in anatomic shoulder arthroplasty., (Copyright © 2016 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)