Search

Unlabelled: In not infected knee prostheses bone scintigraphy is a possible method to diagnose mechanical loosening, and therefore, to affect treatment regimes in symptomatic patients. However, hitherto studies showed controversial results for the reliability of bone scintigraphy in diagnosing loosened knee prostheses by using asymptomatic control groups. Therefore, the AIM of our study was to optimize the interpretation procedure and to evaluate the accuracy using results from revision surgery as standard., Methods: Retrospectively, we were able to examine the tibial component in 31 cemented prostheses. In this prostheses infection was excluded by histological or bacteriological examination during revision surgery. To quantify bone scintigraphy, we used medial and lateral tibial regions with a reference region from the contralateral femur., Results: To differentiate between loosened and intact prostheses we found a threshold of 5.0 for the maximum tibia to femur ratio of the both tibial regions and a threshold of 18% for the difference of the ratio of both tibial regions. Using these thresholds, values of 0.9, 1, 0.85, 1, and 0.94 were calculated for sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value, and accuracy, respectively. To get a sensitivity of 1, we found a lower threshold of 3.3 for the maximum tibia to femur ratio., Conclusion: Quantitative bone scintigraphy appears to be a reliable diagnostic tool for aseptic loosening of knee prostheses with thresholds evaluated by revision surgery results being the golden standard.

Aim: In this study, the accuracy of antigranulocyte scintigraphy as a diagnostic means prior to revision in infected total knee replacement was compared to that of preoperative joint aspiration and laboratory parameters. The most efficient combination of all diagnostic methods was calculated and thus a diagnostic algorithm recommended. The value of PCR was compared to commonly used techniques of microbiological culturing., Methods: Preoperative diagnostic means for infection of 50 total knee replacements in 45 patients requiring revision surgery, were retrospectively analyzed. Inclusion criteria were the intraoperative microbiological and histological verification of infection. Sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive prediction value of C-reactive protein (CRP) and leukocytes, antigranulocyte scintigraphy with (99m)Tc-labeled antibodies, and preoperative joint aspiration were calculated. Furthermore, the accuracy of the different techniques of culturing was compared to that of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based on the intraoperative histological findings. Two blinded examiners evaluated specimens taken intraoperatively according to the criteria of Mirra., Results: We observed a sensitivity of 1.0, a specificity of 0.82, a positive prediction value of 0.83 and a negative prediction value of 1.0 for the antigranulocyte scintigraphy. The sensitivity of preoperative joint aspiration was 0.5, the specificity 1.0, and the positive and negative prediction values were 1.0 and 0.5. Correlated to the intraoperative histological findings the accuracy of PCR and culturing was comparable. The highest accuracy was obtained for blood culture samples., Conclusion: Compared to preoperative joint aspiration the antigranulocyte scintigraphy proved to be more sensitive in the diagnosis an infected knee replacement while having a high specificity. An advantage of PCR compared to the common microbiological culturing techniques was not observed.

Objective: The aim is of this prospective randomised study was to investigate the necessity of resurfacing the patella in combination with total knee arthroplasty in patients without or mild anterior knee pain before undergoing total knee replacement., Methods: Between May 1999 and May 2000 fifty patients were enrolled in a prospective, randomised study. All patients received the same posterior-cruciate-sparing total knee replacement and were randomised to treatment with and without resurfacing of the patella. Inclusion criteria were primary osteoarthritis of the knee, preoperatively no pain when the patella was shifted during clinical examination, a maximal grade III radiological degeneration of the patella according to Sperner et al. and at most a mild anterior knee pain in preoperative interview. Evaluations consisted of the determination of the Knee Society clinical score, the completion of a patient satisfaction questionnaire, and radiographic assessment basing on the Knee Society roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. All patients were examined preoperatively and 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively., Results: In all postoperative examinations patients with patella resurfacing demonstrated a higher overall Knee Society score. At month 6 the difference was statistically significant. The patient satisfaction questionnaire demonstrated no significant difference between both groups. However, regarding to relief of anterior knee pain and improvement of pain in general patients with nonresurfacing were less satisfied at all follow-ups. Furthermore, after 12 months all answers to the patient satisfaction questionnaire of the resurfaced group were better. Patella-associated revisions were performed in two patients without resurfacing. Radiographic analysis demonstrated no loosening, fracture, subluxation or dislocation., Conclusion: The presented study demonstrated after one year follow-up a better functional result, a higher degree of contentment and fewer complications after total knee replacement with patella resurfacing in patients without or mild preoperative anterior knee pain.