Search

Background: Long-term complications following total joint arthroplasty are not well established for patients who have Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS), a group of connective tissue disorders. This study compared 10-year incidence of revision surgery after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in patients who have and do not have EDS., Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using a national all-payer claims database from 2010 to 2021 to identify patients who underwent primary TKA or THA. Patients who had and did not have EDS were propensity score-matched by age, sex, and a comorbidity index. Kaplan-Meier analyses and Cox proportional hazard models were used to determine the cumulative incidence and risks of revision experienced by patients who have and do not have EDS., Results: The EDS patients who underwent TKA had a higher risk of all-cause revision (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.50, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.09 to 2.07, P < .014) and risk of revision due to instability (HR = 2.49, 95% CI: 1.37 to 4.52, P < .003). The EDS patients who underwent THA had a higher risk of all-cause revision (HR = 2.32, 95% CI: 1.47 to 3.65, P < .001), revision due to instability (HR = 4.26, 95% CI: 2.17 to 8.36, P < .001), and mechanical loosening (HR = 3.63, 95% CI: 2.05 to 6.44, P < .001)., Conclusions: Patients who had EDS were found to have a higher incidence of revision within 10 years of undergoing TKA and THA compared to matched controls, especially for instability. Patients who have EDS should be counseled accordingly. Surgical technique and implant selection should include consideration for increased constraint in TKA and larger femoral heads or dual mobility articulations for THA., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: In patients considered high-risk for infection, extended oral antibiotic (EOA) prophylaxis has been demonstrated to reduce rates of prosthetic joint infection following total hip arthroplasty (THA). Although national guidelines regarding their use have not yet been created, the increase in literature surrounding EOA prophylaxis suggests a potential change in practice patterns. The purpose of this study was to investigate the trends in utilization of EOA prophylaxis following THA from 2010 to 2022 and identify prescription patterns., Methods: A total of 646,059 primary THA and 51,879 aseptic revision THA patients were included in this study. Patients who underwent primary or aseptic revision THA between 2010 and 2022 were identified in a national administrative claims database. Rates and duration of EOA prescriptions were calculated. A secondary analysis examined rates of utilization across demographics, including patients considered high risk for infection., Results: From 2010 to 2022, utilization of EOA increased by 366% and 298% following primary and revision THA, respectively. Of patients prescribed postoperative antibiotics, 30% and 59% were prescribed antibiotics for more than 7 days following primary and revision THA, respectively. Rates of utilization were similar between high-risk individuals and the general population., Conclusions: Rates of utilization of EOA prophylaxis after THA have increased significantly since 2010. As current trends demonstrate a wide variation in prescription patterns, including in length of antibiotic duration and in patient population prescribed, guidelines surrounding the use of EOA prophylaxis after THA are necessary to promote antibiotic stewardship while preventing rates of periprosthetic joint infection., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

There is renewed interest in cemented femoral fixation in total hip arthroplasty in the United States, and to fully appreciate the evolution of cemented femoral stem designs, an understanding of their history and design rationale is essential. To adequately study the outcomes of modern-day designs, a comprehensive classification system is also necessary. The biomechanical principles, failure mechanisms, and clinical outcomes associated with various cemented femoral stems are described in this comprehensive review. In addition, an updated version of an existing classification system is described that incorporates the primary design characteristics which differentiate implants currently in use. In this classification, implants are categorized as taper-slip (Type I), which are subdivided by Anatomic (IA), Double-Taper (IB), and Triple-Taper (IC) with subclassification for Traditional and Line-to-Line implants. Composite beam (Type II) implants are similarly divided into Anatomic (IIA), Straight (IIB), and Wedge (IIC) with subclassification for Polished, Satin, or Roughened finish. This classification system provides a basis for comparing cemented femoral stems, thereby improving our understanding of the effect of design characteristics on survivorship to guide future advancements and improve clinical outcomes., (Copyright © 2024 by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.)

Background: Preoperative anemia is common in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Several definitions of anemia have been described, with no clear consensus on the optimal one for preoperative screening. We hypothesized that depending on the definition used preoperatively, the proportion of anemic patients identified who would require a postoperative allogeneic blood transfusion would vary significantly., Methods: A total of 681,141 patients were identified in a national database who underwent either THA or TKA. Preoperative anemia was classified according to the World Health Organization (WHO) definition, Cleveland Clinic (CC) definition, or race, age, and sex-specific definition described by Beutler et al in 2006. The optimal preoperative (OP) hemoglobin thresholds to predict perioperative transfusions were also calculated using receiver operating characteristic curves., Results: When using the WHO definition, 18% of anemic patients required a transfusion versus 14% (OP definition), 12% (CC definition), and 16% (Beutler definition). Similarly, 0.69% of anemic patients sustained a periprosthetic joint infection within 30 days using the WHO definition versus 0.59% (OP definition), 0.60% (CC definition), or 0.66% (Beutler definition). Using the WHO definition, 5.3% of patients would have sustained a major complication versus 4.5% (OP definition), 4.4% (CC definition), and 5.0% (Beutler definition)., Conclusions: Variation in the definition of anemia for preoperative screening in THA and TKA results in substantial differences in discriminative ability to predict perioperative transfusions. The WHO definition identified the largest proportion of patients who ultimately received a perioperative transfusion., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: In osteoporotic patients, surgeons may utilize cemented femoral fixation to minimize risk of fracture. The purpose of this study was to compare 5-year implant survivability in patients who have osteoporosis who underwent elective total hip arthroplasty (THA) with cementless versus cemented fixation., Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients who have osteoporosis undergoing THA with either cemented or cementless femoral fixation was conducted using a national administrative claims database. Of the 18,431 identified THA patients who have osteoporosis, 15,867 (86.1%) underwent cementless fixation. The primary outcome was a comparison of the 5-year cumulative incidences of aseptic revision, mechanical loosening, and periprosthetic fracture (PPF). Kaplan-Meier and Multivariable Cox Proportional Hazard Ratio analyses were used, controlling for femoral fixation method, age, sex, a comorbidity scale, use of osteoporosis medication, and important comorbidity., Results: There was no difference in aseptic revision (Hazard's Ratio (HR): 1.13; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.79 to 1.62; P value: .500) and PPF (HR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.64 to 1.44; P value: .858) within 5 years of THA between fixation cohorts. However, patients who had cemented fixation were more likely to suffer mechanical loosening with 5 years post-THA (HR: 1.79; 95% CI: 1.17 to 2.71; P-value: .007)., Conclusions: We found a similar 5-year rate of PPF when comparing patients who underwent cementless versus cemented femoral fixation for elective THA regardless of preoperative diagnosis of osteoporosis. While existing registry data support the use of cemented fixation in elderly patients, a more thorough understanding of the interplay between age, osteoporosis, and implant design is needed to delineate in whom cemented fixation is most warranted for PPF prevention., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: This study identifies data-driven strata for preoperative Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and same-day glucose levels that maximize differences in the likelihood of complications following total hip arthroplasty (THA)., Methods: Patients who underwent THA from 2013 to 2022 were identified using a national database. In total, 18,728 patients were identified with a mean age of 67 years (range, 18 to 80). Stratum specific likelihood ratio (SSLR) analysis determined separate strata for HbA1c and same-day glucose levels that minimized the likelihood of 90-day complications following THA. Each stratum was propensity-score matched based on age, sex, hypertension, heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and obesity to the lowest respective stratum. The risk ratio (RR) with respect to the lowest matched stratum was observed., Results: Our SSLR analysis identified 3 data-driven HbA1c strata (4.5 to 5.9, 6.0 to 6.9, and 7.0+) and two same-day glucose strata (60 to 189 and 190+) that predicted 90-day major complications. For HbA1c, when compared to the lowest strata (4.5 to 5.9), the risk of 90-day major complications sequentially increased as the HbA1c strata increased: 6.0 to 6.9 (RR: 1.21; P = .041), 7+ (RR: 1.82; P < .001). For same-day glucose, when compared to the matched lowest strata (60 to 189), the risk of 90-day major complications was higher for the 190+ strata (RR: 1.5; P < .001)., Conclusions: Our results support the use of multiple HbA1c strata that can be incorporated into preoperative risk-stratification models. Additionally, we identified a single cut-off level of 190 as a maximum target blood glucose level perioperatively., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Osteoporosis is a known, modifiable risk factor for lower extremity periprosthetic fractures. Unfortunately, a high percentage of patients at risk of osteoporosis who undergo THA or TKA do not receive routine screening and treatment for osteoporosis, but there is insufficient information determining the proportion of patients undergoing THA and TKA who should be screened and their implant-related complications., Questions/purposes: (1) What proportion of patients in a large database who underwent THA or TKA met the criteria for osteoporosis screening? (2) What proportion of these patients received a dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) study before arthroplasty? (3) What was the 5-year cumulative incidence of fragility fracture or periprosthetic fracture after arthroplasty of those at high risk compared with those at low risk of osteoporosis?, Methods: Between January 2010 and October 2021, 710,097 and 1,353,218 patients who underwent THA and TKA, respectively, were captured in the Mariner dataset of the PearlDiver database. We used this dataset because it longitudinally tracks patients across a variety of insurance providers throughout the United States to provide generalizable data. Patients at least 50 years old with at least 2 years of follow-up were included, and patients with a diagnosis of malignancy and fracture-indicated total joint arthroplasty were excluded. Based on this initial criterion, 60% (425,005) of THAs and 66% (897,664) of TKAs were eligible. A further 11% (44,739) of THAs and 11% (102,463) of TKAs were excluded because of a prior diagnosis of or treatment for osteoporosis, leaving 54% (380,266) of THAs and 59% (795,201) of TKAs for analysis. Patients at high risk of osteoporosis were filtered using demographic and comorbidity information provided by the database and defined by national guidelines. The proportion of patients at high risk of osteoporosis who underwent osteoporosis screening via DEXA scan within 3 years was observed, and the 5-year cumulative incidence of periprosthetic fractures and fragility fracture was compared between the high-risk and low-risk cohorts., Results: In total, 53% (201,450) and 55% (439,982) of patients who underwent THA and TKA, respectively, were considered at high risk of osteoporosis. Of these patients, 12% (24,898 of 201,450) and 13% (57,022 of 439,982) of patients who underwent THA and TKA, respectively, received a preoperative DEXA scan. Within 5 years, patients at high risk of osteoporosis undergoing THA and TKA had a higher cumulative incidence of fragility fractures (THA: HR 2.1 [95% CI 1.9 to 2.2]; TKA: HR 1.8 [95% CI 1.7 to 1.9]) and periprosthetic fractures (THA: HR 1.7 [95% CI 1.5 to 1.8]; TKA: HR 1.6 [95% CI 1.4 to 1.7]) than those at low risk (p < 0.001 for all)., Conclusion: We attribute the higher rates of fragility and periprosthetic fractures in those at high risk compared with those at low risk to an occult diagnosis of osteoporosis. Hip and knee arthroplasty surgeons can help reduce the incidence and burden of these osteoporosis-related complications by initiating screening and subsequently referring patients to bone health specialists for treatment. Future studies might investigate the proportion of osteoporosis in patients at high risk of having the condition, develop and evaluate practical bone health screening and treatment algorithms for hip and knee arthroplasty surgeons, and observe the cost-effectiveness of implementing these algorithms., Level of Evidence: Level III, therapeutic study., Competing Interests: All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research ® editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request., (Copyright © 2023 by the Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons.)

Background: Fragility fractures are often the initial clinical presentation of osteoporosis. Patients who have a history of fragility fractures undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) have an increased risk of 2-year postoperative complications. However, the association of recent fragility fractures with complications beyond 2 years following THA remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to characterize the association of prior fragility fractures with 8-year risks of revision THA, periprosthetic fracture (PPF), and secondary fragility fracture., Methods: Patients aged 50 years and more who underwent THA for osteoarthritis were identified in a large national database. Patients were stratified based on whether they sustained a fragility fracture within 3 years prior to THA. There were 18,529 patients who had a prior fragility fracture and 408,753 who did not have a prior fragility fracture. Demographics and comorbidities were collected. Kaplan-Meier and Cox Proportional Hazards analyses were used to observe the cumulative incidences of all-cause revision, PPF, and secondary fragility fracture within 8 years of index surgery., Results: Patients who had recent fragility fracture had significantly higher risks of revision THA (Hazard Ratio [HR] 1.7; P < .001), PPF (HR 2.2; P < .001), and secondary fragility fracture (HR 4.9; P < .001)., Conclusion: Prior fragility fracture was shown to be a significant risk factor for revision THA, PPF, and secondary fragility fracture within 8 years of THA. Identification of these high-risk patients with an emphasis on preoperative and postoperative bone health optimization may help minimize these complications., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: Each author certifies that there are no funding or commercial associations (consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article related to the author or any immediate family members. All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research ® editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request.

Background: Elevated body mass index (BMI) is a risk factor for complications following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Thus, we believe it is important to constantly re-evaluate the relationship between BMI and complication risk following TKA., Method: Patients undergoing primary TKA were identified in a national database from 2012-2020. Rates of major complications, minor complications, and length of stay (LOS) greater than 2 days were calculated. The prevalence of postoperative outcomes were calculated per unit of BMI and then multiplied by a factor of 10 ^2 or 10 ^3 in order to create adjusted-BMI (aBMI). To isolate the effect of aBMI on postoperative outcomes, changes over time were analyzed using linear regression analysis controlling for age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) classification and smoking status., Results: 365,333 patients were included. Mean BMI 33 ± 6.8. 10,616 (2.9%) of patients had a major postoperative complication, 9,345 (2.6%) minor complications, 3,277 (0.9%) had a deep or superficial surgical site infection (SSI). 133,563 (37%) of patients had LOS > 2 days. From 2012-2020, the ratio of major complications to aBMI decreased significantly by an average of -2.7% per year. The ratio of patients with LOS > 2 days to aBMI decreased significantly by -27% per year. The ratio of SSI to aBMI increased significantly by 10.8% per year., Conclusions: From 2012 to 2020, the ratio of major complications and extended LOS following TKA as a function of BMI has decreased significantly, while the ratio of SSI as a function of BMI has doubled., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: [Harris: None. Kapoor: None. Gu: None. Agarwal: None. Golladay: Royalties from Stryker; Research support from KCI, Cerus; Financial or material support from AAHKS; Member of AAHKS, Virginia Orthopaedic Society. Thakkar: Research support from 3 M, Depuy; Editorial/governing board Arthroplasty Today, Journal of Arthroplasty, JAAOS, Journal of Hip Surgery; Member of AAOS AUC, AAHKS YAG. The study was exempt from institutional review board approval: IRB00326015.], (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Elevated body mass index (BMI) is associated with complications following Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA). Since obese individuals are almost 10 times more likely to require THA compared to non-obese individuals, we need to understand the risk-benefit continuum while considering THA in obese patients. We aimed to determine data-driven thresholds for BMI at which the risk of major complications following THA increases significantly., Methods: Patients were identified in a national database who underwent primary THA from 2010 to 2020. BMI thresholds were identified using the stratum-specific likelihood ratio (SSLR) methodology, which is an adaptive technique that allows for identification of BMI cut-offs, at which the risk of major complications is increased significantly . BMI cutoffs identified using SSLR were used to create a logistic regression model., Results: A total of 224,413 patients were identified with a mean age of 66 ± 10, BMI 32 ± 6.7, and 7,186 (3%) sustained a major complication. BMI thresholds were defined as 19-31, 32-37, 38-49 and 50+. Overall, the absolute risk of major complications increased from 2.9% in the lowest BMI strata to 7.5% in the highest BMI strata. Compared to patients with a BMI between 19-31, the odds of sustaining a major complication sequentially increased by 1.2, 1.6, and 2.5-times for patients in each higher BMI strata (all, P < .05)., Conclusions: We have identified BMI cutoffs using SSLR that categorizes patients into four categories of risk for major complications in a nationally representative patient sample. These thresholds can be used in the surgical decision-making process between patients and surgeons., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

As healthcare costs continue to increase in the United States, it is important to understand the trends in the allocation of healthcare spending for common orthopaedic surgical procedures. We investigated the recent trends in (1) total net payments (for episode of care), (2) payments to hospitals, (3) payments to physicians, (4) payments to physicians as a percentage of total net payments, and (5) regional variation in hospital and physician payments for four common orthopaedic procedures., Methods: Using a private insurance claims database, we analyzed the payments to US hospitals and physicians from 2010 to 2016 for primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) (n = 128,269), total knee arthroplasty (TKA) (n = 223,319), 1-level anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF) (n = 51,477), and 1-level lumbar-instrumented posterior spinal fusion (PSF) (n = 45,680). Regional variations in payments were also assessed. Trends were analyzed using linear regression models adjusting for age, sex, comorbidities, duration of hospital stay, and inflation (alpha = 0.05)., Results: Inflation-adjusted total net payments for the episode of care increased by the following percentages per year: 5.2% for ACDF, 3.2% for PSF, 2.9% for TKA, and 2.6% for THA. Annual inflation-adjusted hospital payments increased significantly for all 4 procedures, whereas annual inflation-adjusted physician payments decreased by -2.2%/year for PSF, -1.5%/year for TKA, -1.1%/year for THA, and -0.4%/year for ACDF (all, P < 0.001). As a percentage of total net payments, physician payments decreased markedly for ACDF (-4.6%), PSF (-3.1%), TKA (-2.1%), and THA (-1.8%). Hospital and physician payments varied significantly by region and were both highest in the West ( P < 0.001)., Conclusions: From 2010 to 2016, inflation-adjusted total net payments for 4 common orthopaedic surgical procedures increased markedly, as did payments to the US hospitals for these procedures. Payments to orthopaedic surgeons for these procedures decreased markedly during the same period., Competing Interests: None of the following authors or any immediate family member has received anything of value from or has stock or stock options held in a commercial company or institution related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article: Dr. Marrache, Mr. Harris, Dr. Puvanesarajah, Dr. Raad, Dr. Hassanzadeh; Dr. Srikumaran, Dr. Ficke, Dr. Levy, and Dr. Jain., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.)