Search

Objective: Reliable fusion and optimal correction of the alignment of the ankle joint using a 2-incision, 3-screw technique., Indications: Symptomatic osteoarthritis of the ankle joint after insufficient other treatment, severe deformity of the osteoarthritic ankle joint, or salvation procedure after failed arthroplasty., Contraindications: Active osteomyelitis, very poor soft tissues, or severe peripheral arterial occlusive disease., Surgical Technique: Osteotomy and excision medial malleolus. Osteotomy, dislocation, and denudation of the distal fibula. Osteotomy of distal tibia and talus in the desired position for optimal alignment. Temporary tibiotalar fixation with two Weber reposition clamps. Final tibiotalar fixation with a medial and lateral 4.5 mm full threaded cortical lag screw. Reduction of the distal fibula and fibulotibial fixation using a similar technique., Postoperative Management: A nonweight-bearing circular below knee cast for 6 weeks, followed by a walker or weight-bearing cast for another 6 weeks., Results: A total of 30 ankle fusions in 26 patients were analyzed. Mean age at fusion was 50 years (range 11-72.1 years). Mean follow-up time was 9.2 years (3.4-18.8 years). Radiological and clinical fusion in 28 (93%) of the primary arthrodeses. The mean American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot score was 66 ± 12. Of the 26 patients, 22 (85%) were satisfied. Deep wound infection occurred once (3%). No other serious complications were encountered. The described technique provides reliable long-term follow-up results for a wide range of indications for ankle fusion.

With a "headless" humerus active abduction and elevation of the arm are hardly possible. Especially if the humeral head was removed because of an infection, shoulder fusion is often the only safe solution for this disabling condition. Large corticocancellous, autologous bone grafts are interposed between the thin humeral stump on one side and its broad glenoid-acromion counterpart on the other. A 4.5 narrow AO-plate stabilizes the fusion. The technique is described and the functional result of two patients is shown. Ten years after the operation, both patients were free of pain and very satisfied about the utility of the arm. The fusion had convincingly healed in the planned position. Shoulder fusion proved to be a safe and good solution for both our patients with a longstanding headless humerus. Ten years after the operation they were free of pain and had regained a useful arm.

Trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis is a common entity, often bilateral and predominantly affecting postmenopausal women. In the case of failure of conservative treatment, surgery is a good option. The aim of this study was to compare three surgical procedures. 63 patients (74 thumbs) with osteoarthritis of the trapezio-metacarpal joint were surgically treated; 54 patients were seen for follow-up, 7 had died and 2 were lost to follow-up. The patients were stratified according to treatment; resection arthroplasty (the joint surface's of the metacarpal and the trapezium are resected) (18 thumbs), trapeziectomy with tendon interposition (17 thumbs) or trapezio-metacarpal arthrodesis (28 thumbs). Baseline characteristics were comparable in the three groups for mean age at operation, Eaton classification, left right distribution and dominant hands operated. The average follow-up was 13 years for the resection group, 8 years for the trapeziectomy group and 9 years for the arthrodesis group. No statistically significant difference between the three groups was found for the visual analogue pain and satisfaction scale, pain frequency nor DASH score. Patients in the trapeziectomy group had significantly less pain compared to the arthrodesis group (p=0.025). Statistically, radial abduction was significantly better after trapeziectomy compared to resection arthroplasty (p<0.01) or arthrodesis (p=0.01). There was no difference among the three groups in grip and tip pinch strength nor in pain on palpation. None of the patients in the trapeziectomy group needed a re-operation, one patient in the resection arthroplasty group had a re-operation, and 22 patients in the arthrodesis group had one or more re-operations for hardware removal or because of a complication. This study shows that the resection arthroplasty has equally good long term results compared to trapeziectomy combined with tendon interposition or arthrodesis. Resection arthroplasty is performed through a single incision and is technically simple. In our clinic resection arthroplasty is therefore the preferred technique for the treatment of osteoarthritis of the trapeziometacarpal joint.

The talonavicular joint as part of the coxa pedis plays a pivotal role in the overall motion of the foot. The necessity for talonavicular fusion arises from isolated arthritis of posttraumatic, rheumatoid, degenerative, or idiopathic etiology. Posttraumatic arthritis is seen after malunited mid-tarsal (Chopart) fracture-dislocations and is frequently accompanied by malalignment due to an imbalance between the medial and lateral columns of the foot. In these cases a corrective arthrodesis becomes necessary. In cases of poor bone stock or arthritis of the calcaneocuboid joint, a double arthrodesis is preferred over isolated talonavicular fusion. Fusion with mini-plates is biomechanically superior to fusion with screws and especially staples, the latter being associated with non-union rates of up to 37%. Talonavicular fusion allows reproducible pain reduction in isolated arthritis with subjective patient satisfaction of between 86% and 100% in a literature review. The substantial reduction of movement in the triple joint complex leads to overload of the adjacent joints with development of arthritis in about 30% in the medium term.

Thirty-six thumbs with symptomatic osteoarthritis of the first carpometacarpal joint were treated either by trapezio-metacarpal arthrodesis (n = 18) or resection-tendon-interposition arthroplasty (n = 18). The mean follow-up of the 29 patients was 42 months. With the data available, we could not find any difference in the outcome of either procedure. In the majority of cases, the main aim of the operation, relief of pain, was achieved, the patients were satisfied and pleased with the functional result of the operation. No difference in grip strength between the operated and the normal contralateral hand could be established. Nevertheless, the arthrodesis seems to be the procedure causing fewer problems (only one patient not completely satisfied) and is therefore preferred over the resection-tendon-interposition arthroplasty.

We have reviewed the long-term results of 22 patients (23 fusions) with fractures of the os calcis, who had subtalar arthrodesis with correction of the deformity between 1975 and 1991. The mean follow-up was nine years (5 to 20). All patients were evaluated according to a modified foot score. A radiological assessment was used in which linear and angular variables were measured including the fibulocalcaneal abutment, the height of the heel and fat pad, the angle of the arch and the lateral talocalcaneal and the lateral talar declination angles. The technique used restores the normal relationship between the hindfoot and midfoot and corrects the height of the heel. This leads to better biomechanical balance of the neighbouring joints and gives a favourable clinical outcome. The modified foot score showed a good or excellent result in 51% of the feet. Residual complaints were mostly due to problems with the soft tissues. Subjectively, an excellent or good score was achieved in 78% of the cases. After statistical analysis, except for the height of the heel and the degenerative changes in the calcaneocuboid joint, no significant difference was found in the measured variables between the operated and the contralateral side.

From 1975 to 1990 we performed subtalar or triple arthrodesis on 54 patients; 48 of them were reviewed after a mean follow-up of 10 years (6 to 15). There were 17 subtalar fusions in 14 patients and 37 triple arthrodeses in 28 patients. We assessed tibiotalar ankle function using the criteria of Mazur which gives a points score of a maximum of 100. Radiological evidence of degenerative change was graded on a scale of 0 to 4. The mean Mazur score was 85 for the subtalar fusions and 78 for the triple arthrodeses. The radiological score showed no degenerative changes in 36 feet (24 triple and 12 subtalar arthrodeses) and an increase of one grade in 14 feet (10 triple and 4 subtalar), of two grades in three feet (all triple arthrodeses) and of three grades in one foot after a subtalar arthrodesis. We found no statistically significant difference in the radiological score in unilateral fusions between feet with subtalar and triple arthrodeses and the contralateral foot. In all four feet which showed an increase in degenerative changes of two or more grades, there was an abnormality of the tibiotalar joint before the fusion operation. Of the 14 feet which showed an increase of one grade, there was a similar increase on the contralateral side in nine. Our findings show that subtalar or triple arthrodesis has little adverse influence on the function of the tibiotalar joint, even after many years.