Search

Objectives: Our aim was to conduct a national audit assessing the impact and experience of early management of inflammatory arthritis by English and Welsh rheumatology units. The audit enables rheumatology services to measure for the first time their performance, patient outcomes and experience, benchmarked to regional and national comparators., Methods: All individuals >16 years of age presenting to English and Welsh rheumatology services with suspected new-onset inflammatory arthritis were included in the audit. Clinician- and patient-derived outcome and patient-reported experience measures were collected., Results: Data are presented for the 6354 patients recruited from 1 February 2014 to 31 January 2015. Ninety-seven per cent of English and Welsh trusts participated. At the first specialist assessment, the 28-joint DAS (DAS28) was calculated for 2659 (91%) RA patients [mean DAS28 was 5.0 and mean Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID) score was 5.6]. After 3 months of specialist care, the mean DAS28 was 3.5 and slightly >60% achieved a meaningful DAS28 reduction. The average RAID score and reduction in RAID score were 3.6 and 2.4, respectively. Of the working patients ages 16-65 years providing data, 7, 5, 16 and 37% reported that they were unable to work, needed frequent time off work, occasionally and rarely needed time off work due to their arthritis, respectively; only 42% reported being asked about their work. Seventy-eight per cent of RA patients providing data agreed with the statement 'Overall in the last 3 months I have had a good experience of care for my arthritis'; <2% disagreed., Conclusion: This audit demonstrates that most RA patients have severe disease at the time of presentation to rheumatology services and that a significant number continue to have high disease activity after 3 months of specialist care. There is a clear need for the National Health Service to develop better systems for capturing, coding and integrating information from outpatient clinics, including measures of patient experience and outcome and measures of ability to work., (© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objectives: A national audit was performed assessing the early management of suspected inflammatory arthritis by English and Welsh rheumatology units. The aim of this audit was to measure the performance of rheumatology services against National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) quality standards (QSs) for the management of early inflammatory arthritis benchmarked to regional and national comparators for the first time in the UK., Methods: All individuals >16 years of age presenting to rheumatology services in England and Wales with suspected new-onset inflammatory arthritis were included in the audit. Information was collected against six NICE QSs that pertain to early inflammatory arthritis management., Results: We present national data for the 6354 patients recruited from 1 February 2014 to 31 January 2015; 97% of trusts and health boards in England and Wales participated in this audit. Only 17% of patients were referred by their general practitioner within 3 days of first presentation. Specialist rheumatology assessment occurred within 3 weeks of referral in 38% of patients. The target of DMARD initiation within 6 weeks of referral was achieved in 53% of RA patients; 36% were treated with combination DMARDs and 82% with steroids within the first 3 months of specialist care. Fifty-nine per cent of patients received structured education on their arthritis within 1 month of diagnosis. In total, 91% of patients had a treatment target set; the agreed target was achieved within 3 months of specialist review in only 27% of patients. Access to urgent advice via a telephone helpline was reported to be available in 96% of trusts., Conclusion: The audit has highlighted gaps between NICE standards and delivery of care, as well as substantial geographic variability., (© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

The first national audit for rheumatoid and early inflammatory arthritis has benchmarked care for the first 3 months of follow-up activity from first presentation to a rheumatology service. Access to care, management of early rheumatoid arthritis and support for self care were measured against National Institute for Health and Care Excellence quality standards; impact of early arthritis and experience of care were measured using patient-reported outcome and experience measures. The results demonstrate delays in referral and accessing specialist care and the need for service improvement in treating to target, suppression of high levels of disease activity and support for self-care. Improvements in patient-reported outcomes within 3 months and high levels of overall satisfaction were reported but these results were affected by low response rates. This article presents a summary of the national data from the audit and discusses the implications for nursing practice.

Objectives: To develop, pilot, refine and reassess an education day presented by a rheumatology multidisciplinary team (MDT) for recently diagnosed (less than six months) rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients and their partners/carers., Methods: A patient education day was developed drawing on an assessment of local patient educational needs and preferences and input from a rheumatology MDT. Feedback from the first education day (2004) (Day 1; 12 patients; age range 19-63 years (median 46); 10 of whom were accompanied by a partner) informed the development of a second education day (2005) (Day 2; 19 patients; age range 36-75 years (median 57.5); 13 of whom were accompanied by a partner). Participants completed evaluation forms on both days and at follow-up between six and seven weeks later, rating each session on a 5-point scale on dimensions of 'informative', 'useful', 'interesting' and 'enjoyable'. A global rating of the day's 'usefulness' was completed at the end of each day on a 10-point scale. Participants were asked to write comments on each session and on aspects of the entire day. RA knowledge, and general and RA-specific self-efficacy were also measured on day 2 (and at follow-up) using the 12-item Patient Knowledge Questionnaire, the 10-item generalized self-efficacy scale and a four-item RA-specific self-efficacy scale. Both qualitative and quantitative methodologies were used in the analysis., Results: Ratings for individual sessions were all high, with no session being rated below 4 out of 5 (1 = 'totally disagree' to 5 = 'totally agree') on both days. The majority of patients (84%) and their partners (57%) responded to the follow-up. Many had used the information package distributed on the day. Some patients and their partners reported positive changes in RA management. Although patient knowledge did not increase significantly (medians 11 at both time points, p = 0.054) (Day 2), RA self-efficacy improved (baseline 11 and 14, respectively), suggesting that patients were more confident in managing their condition (p = 0.010)., Conclusions: The development of this 'local' education and information intervention was carried out in line with Medical Research Council guidelines, and the lessons learned from Day 1 informed further development for Day 2. A one-day format for education of early RA involving the rheumatology MDT was rated highly by participants and warrants further examination. Although this study was a small 'local' intervention, its strengths are that it informs the possibility of wider developments of this kind using a MDT.

Objectives: Whilst all non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can cause adverse gastrointestinal events, COX-2-selective inhibitors (COX-2) may have improved gastrointestinal safety compared with non-selective NSAIDs (NSNSAIDs). In 2001, the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) published guidance on the use of the COX-2 agents celecoxib, rofecoxib, meloxicam and etodolac for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and osteoarthritis (OA). This study aimed to audit the appropriateness of NSAID use in relation to NICE guidance in rheumatology out-patients., Methods: Questionnaires were completed for all patients attending clinics in 18 rheumatology units in the West Midlands over a 2-week period. Data collected included patient demographics, NSAID type, indications, duration of use (> or =3 months was considered prolonged), and concomitant prescription of corticosteroids, warfarin and gastroprotective agents., Results: Data were collected on 2846 patients; 1164 (41%) were taking NSAIDs (791 NSNSAIDs, 373 COX-2). Of the 1164 NSAID users, 753 (65%) had a diagnosis of RA or OA (483 NSNSAIDs, 270 COX-2). Overall, 37% of NSAID prescriptions were appropriate. Of the NSNSAID users, 92% had at least one risk factor for adverse gastrointestinal events and were therefore inappropriately treated. Prolonged use (in 89%) and age > or =65 yr (in 23%) were the most frequent risk factors identified. Of the COX-2 users, 97% had one or more risk factors and were appropriately treated. Analysis of the RA/OA subgroup revealed similar findings. Thirty-six per cent were taking NSAIDs appropriately; 97% of NSNSAID use was inappropriate and 97% of COX-2 use was appropriate treatment. In the whole cohort, gastroprotective agents were used in 26% of NSNSAID users, 56% of gastroprotective agents being proton pump inhibitors., Conclusions: Ninety-two per cent of patients attending rheumatology clinics who were taking NSNSAIDs should have been prescribed a COX-2-selective agent in relation to NICE guidance. Duration of use and age > or =65 yr emerged numerically as the most important risk factors. Significant numbers of patients taking NSNSAIDs may be at risk from adverse gastrointestinal events and clinicians may wish to review their prescribing patterns. Conversely, 97% of patients taking COX-2 agents were treated appropriately. Although practice overall conformed poorly with NICE guidance, NSAID prescribing also needs to be considered in the context of recent concerns regarding the cardiovascular risks of COX-2 agents.

Objectives: There are currently two anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapies licensed for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). A British Society for Rheumatology (BSR) working party defined criteria for patients that would be suitable for such treatment. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of these patients attending rheumatology out-patient departments across the West Midlands., Methods: Data were collected over a 2-week period in adult out-patient departments of 12 centres. A questionnaire was completed at each patient review. Disease activity scores (DAS-28) were recorded for those who had failed methotrexate treatment and at least one other disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) in the absence of contraindications to anti-TNF therapy. Information was also collected on the number of DMARDs failed and the use of steroid therapy., Results: A total of 1441 patients with RA were assessed; 177 (12.3%) patients had failed methotrexate and at least one other DMARD. Of these, 19 had contraindications to the use of anti-TNF therapy. In the remaining 158 patients (11%), 80 (5.6%) had a DAS-28 score of >5.1, thus fulfilling BSR criteria for use of anti-TNF therapy. Those with a DAS-28 score of < or = 5.1 were significantly more likely to have been taking steroids compared with those with a DAS-28 score >5.1 (68.2 and 49.3%, respectively, P=0.024)., Conclusions: Of patients with RA attending adult rheumatology out-patient clinics in the West Midlands, 5.6% would meet BSR criteria for use of anti-TNF therapy. Eligibility may be affected by steroid use.

As a basis for developing interventions to meet the psycho-educational needs of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) outpatients attending a regional hospital have been investigated. Specifically, patients' preferences for interventions addressing education (e.g. the disease and its treatment), self-management (e.g. pain-management, exercise) and the consequences (e.g. emotions, impact on work, family relationships) of RA were examined. In addition, psychological well-being and self-efficacy were examined. Results showed that patients preferred education about the disease and its treatment to be delivered on a one-to-one basis by health professionals. Similarly, emotional issues were believed to be best dealt with one-to-one although this could be with a similar other (i.e. a patient). Group interventions were the preferred format for self-management, exercise and relationship issues, whereas videos were thought to be useful for demonstrating use of aids and how other families cope. None of the participants would welcome computer-based interventions. Psychological well-being (e.g. depression, anxiety) remained stable over a 12-month period. Both physical and psychological health status were correlated with arthritis self-efficacy. The implications of these findings are discussed in relation to development of interventions to better meet the psycho-educational needs of outpatients with RA.

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) of short disease duration (i.e. < or = 1 year) compared with patients of longer disease duration (i.e. > or = 10 years) in terms of RA knowledge, symptoms of anxiety, symptoms of depression and disease acceptance. In addition, the predictors of psychological distress (i.e. symptoms of anxiety and depression) were examined. Data were collected by self-administered questionnaires. As expected, patients with more established disease were significantly older and had more physical dysfunction. However, there were no statistically significant differences on anxiety, depression, acceptance of illness, pain or knowledge about RA. The need for education regarding RA and its implications was expressed by all participants regardless of disease duration. Illness acceptance beliefs were identified as significant predictors of both anxiety and depression.

Ten episodes of severe pyogenic infection occurring in nine patients with rheumatoid arthritis are reported. There was a wide range of presenting features including pyoarthrosis in 7 episodes. Three cases presented with meningitis, bacterial endocarditis and probable multiple abscesses respectively. Infection was caused by Staphylococcus aureus in 7 episodes and by Staphylococcus epidermidis, Streptococcus pneumoniae and beta-haemolytic Streptococcus in each of one episode. Three infective episodes were fatal. Pyogenic, especially staphylococcal, infection should be considered in patients with rheumatoid arthritis with unexplained illness with or without sudden deterioration in joint symptoms. It is important to recognize and treat infection rapidly.