Search

Objective: To update the consensus document of the Spanish Society of Rheumatology (SER) regarding the use of targeted biological and synthetic therapies in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with the aim of assisting clinicians in their therapeutic decisions., Methods: A panel of 13 experts was assembled through an open call by SER. We employed a mixed adaptation-elaboration-update methodology starting from the 2015 Consensus Document of the Spanish Society of Rheumatology on the use of biological therapies in RA. Starting with systematic reviews (SR) of recommendations from EULAR 2019, American College of Rheumatology 2021, and GUIPCAR 2017, we updated the search strategies for the PICO questions of GUIPCAR. An additional SR was conducted on demyelinating disease in relation to targeted biological and synthetic therapies. Following the analysis of evidence by different panelists, consensus on the wording and level of agreement for each recommendation was reached in a face-to-face meeting., Results: The panel established 5 general principles and 15 recommendations on the management of RA. These encompassed crucial aspects such as the importance of early treatment, therapeutic goals in RA, monitoring frequency, the use of glucocorticoids, the application of conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs), biological DMARDs (bDMARDs), and targeted synthetic DMARDs. Additionally, recommendations on dose reduction of these drugs in stable patients were included. This update also features recommendations on the use of bDMARDs and Janus Kinase inhibitors in some specific clinical situations, such as patients with lung disease, a history of cancer, heart failure, or demyelinating disease., Conclusions: This update provides recommendations on key aspects in the management of RA using targeted biological and synthetic therapies., (Copyright © 2024 Sociedad Española de Reumatología (SER), Colegio Mexicano de Reumatología (CMR) and Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To evaluate the survival of different biologic or targeted-synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARD) administered after fulfilling difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis (D2TRA) criteria, and to assess factors related to treatment discontinuation., Methods: Retrospective study including D2TRA patients. Drug retention of the b/tsDMARD administered after fulfilling D2TRA was assessed by Kaplan-Meier plots and the log-rank test. Cox hazard models were used to identify factors affecting treatment discontinuation., Results: Of the 122 patients included, 75 maintained active treatment (61.5%) with a subsequent line after D2T compared to 47 (38.5%) who discontinued and required more successive lines of b/tsDMARDs. The median survival of the treatments was 78.3(7.6) months and the treatment after D2T with the better rate of survival was rituximab, followed by JAKi and IL6Ri, while worse survival rates were associated with abatacept and TNFi. Significant differences were noted among b/tsDMARDs (log-rank p < 0.01) and to evaluate these differences, a Cox regression was performed, taking each b/tsDMARD as a reference and comparing it with the others. DAS28 values 6-months after initiation of treatment were higher in those patients who discontinued treatment [4.4(1.2) vs 3.5(1.3), p = 0.01]. The multivariate cox regression model revealed that treatment choice after D2T [HR = 1.26(95%CI 1.06-1.05)] and lower DAS28 values at 6 months [HR = 1.49(95%CI 1.16-1.52)] were independent risk factors associated with treatment discontinuation., Conclusions: Once patients met the D2TRA criteria, the subsequent line of b/tsDMARDs with the best survival rates were rituximab, JAKi and IL6Ri. Moreover, DAS28 at 6-months of treatment after D2T was an independent risk factor for drug discontinuation. Key Points • Rituximab, IL6Ri and JAKi have better retention rates in patients after fulfilling D2TRA criteria • Clinical disease activity in the first six months after fulfillment of D2TRA criteria is an independent risk factor of subsequent treatment survival., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to International League of Associations for Rheumatology (ILAR).)

Objectives: Certolizumab pegol (CZP), an Fc-free antibody fragment, has shown stable serum levels and steady efficacy in the treatment of RA patients, irrespective of RF levels at baseline. Here, we examine, in clinical practice, the effect of baseline RF and ACPA levels on serum drug levels of IFX, ADL and CZP an Fc-free antibody fragment., Methods: This is a retrospective study performed in real-world patients. We assessed 170 patients with RA: 90 (53%) received IFX, 48 (28%) ADL and 32 (19%) CZP. Demographic and clinical variables, RF and ACPA levels were obtained at the baseline visit (T0), and patients were stratified based on negative, low, medium, or high levels. After 6 months (T6) serum drug levels and anti-drug antibodies (ADAb), were computed., Results: While CZP serum levels did not differ across RF groups at T6, high baseline RF was linked to lower serum drug levels compared to RF negative status in treatment with complete monoclonal antibodies IFX and ADL. No differences in disease activity measured by DAS28 at baseline were observed across RF quartiles in patients treated with IFX or ADL. ADAb was observed in 26 patients with IFX, 3 with ADL and 1 with CZP, following 6 months of treatment. Patients with high baseline RF levels dropped out more frequently by secondary non-response in IFX or ADL than CZP (80% vs. 75% vs. 33%, p=0.002)., Conclusions: In this real word data evaluation, CZP serum levels were independent of RF levels in patients however patients with high baseline RF levels who obtained IFX or ADL had lower serum drug levels at 6 months than baseline RF-negative patients. In addition, secondary non-response was more frequent in patients with high RF levels treated with IFX and ADL.

Objective: To assess whether the retention rate of certolizumab pegol (CZP) was longer than that of other tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) based on baseline rheumatoid factor (RF) levels., Methods: Longitudinal, retrospective and multicentre study including patients with RA who were treated with any TNFi (monoclonal antibodies (mAB), etanercept (ETA) or CZP). Log-rank test and Cox regressions were conducted to evaluate the retention rate in the three groups according to the level of RF, with the third quartile of the baseline levels used as cut-off: <200 (

Objectives: To analyse the trajectories of Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28), patient global assessment (PGA) and physician global assessment (PhGA) and to assess their predictive capabilities on difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis (D2TRA) classification., Methods: Longitudinal study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) from 2020 to 2022. Based on the D2TRA EULAR (European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology) definition, patients were classified as D2TRA according to biological or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) failure due to inefficacy (D2TRA-inefficacy) or other reasons (D2TRA-other). Patients who did not fulfil the D2TRA criteria were classified as NoD2TRA. DAS28, PGA and PhGA scores collected every 6 months during the first 24 months of b/tsDMARD treatment were used to identify different trajectories using latent class mixed models (LCMM)., Results: The study population comprised 255 patients with RA, of whom 167 were NoD2TRA, 58 D2TRA-inefficacy and 30 D2TRA-other. LCMM stratified patients into two different trajectories for DAS28 and PhGA and three for PGA according to the most stable model. The most notable variation occurred during the first 6 months of treatment, thereafter remaining stable during the follow-up period. Most D2TRA-inefficacy patients fitted the trajectory, showing higher values of the studied parameters. NoD2TRA followed the trajectory with lower values, and D2TRA-other were distributed more homogeneously across all trajectories., Conclusions: The assessment of disease activity, together with patients' and physicians' perceptions, form a key element in the correct discrimination of patients who are going to develop D2TRA-inefficacy. However, identifying those patients who will be D2TRA-other remains challenging, whether by subjective or objective parameters., Competing Interests: Competing interests: MNN reports grants from UCB, Lilly, Galapagos and Janssen outside the submitted work. AV reports grants from Janssen. IM reports grants from Roche, Novartis, UCB and Gedeon Richter outside the submitted work. CP-R reports grants from AbbVie, Pfizer, Novartis, Lilly and Roche outside the submitted work. AB reports grants from AbbVie, Amgen, Pfizer, Galapagos, Novartis, Gilead, BMS, Nordic, Sanofi, Sandoz, Lilly, UCB and Roche outside the submitted work., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objectives: Multiple failures to biologic or targeted specific disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) that lead to difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis (D2TRA) may be the result of multi-drug inefficacy or reflect treatment problems related to adverse events, comorbidities, and/or poor adherence. We aimed to characterise a cohort of D2TRA patients in clinical practice, to analyse the differences between D2TRA due to inefficacy versus D2TRA from other causes, and to compare them with non-D2TRA., Methods: The D2TRA group included patients who were receiving ≥2b/tsDMARDs due to inefficacy (D2TRA-inef cacy) or because of adverse events, poor adherence, contraindications, comorbidities, drug-intolerance, etc. (D2TRA-other). Patients who achieved low disease activity or remission with the rst bDMARD were classified as non-D2TRA patients. For all patients, demographic, clinical characteristics and laboratory parameters were assessed prior to starting the rst b/tsDMARD. Descriptive analysis was performed and bivariate logistic regression models were assembled., Results: In total, 253 patients were included: 131 non-D2TRA and 122 D2TRA [86 (70.5%) D2TRA-inefficacy and 36 (29.5%) D2TRA-other]. Comparison of the two groups of D2TRA patients: no differences in gender, age at start of b/tsDMARD or age at RA diagnosis were found; this was also true of socioeconomic status, frequency of anxiety-depression and other comorbidities. Patients categorised as D2TRA-other had less extra-articular manifestations than D2TRA-inef cacy, as well as lower values of DAS28 at the start of the rst b/tsDMARD. Comparisons of Non-D2TRA patients versus D2TRA-other resulted in the following observations: no differences in sociodemographic characteristics were evident nor were there any differences in terms of disease activity., Conclusions: Patients with D2TRA-other are indistinguishable from non-D2TRA patients at baseline, indicating the former cohort does not appear to have any predictive value during the early stages of b/tsDMARD treatment, unlike what occurs in patients with D2TRA-inefficacy.

Objectives: To analyse the role of body mass index (BMI) in the clinical response to biologic dis-ease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). To per-form an in-depth analysis of the pathophysiology of obesity by assessing serum adipokine levels and their potential changes according to treatment., Methods: This study involved 105 patients with RA starting tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) or tocilizumab (TCZ). Patients were classified ac-cording to BMI as normal-weight and overweight/obesity. The clinical response to treatment was as-sessed by Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) 6 months after initiation of bDMARDs. Serum adi-pokines (leptin and adiponectin) were determined using a commercial immunoassay kit in samples ob-tained before initiation of bDMARDs and after 6 months of treatment., Results: A correlation was observed between BMI and disease activity and between BMI and serum adipokines. Sixty percent of patients achieved low disease activity (LDA)/remission: 45 patients in TNFi group (64.2%) and 18 (51.4%) in TCZ group. In TNFi group, patients who did not attain LDA/remission had a higher BMI (kg/m2) ([28.7±5.1] vs. [24.5±4.6], p=0.001) and baseline CDAI (26.3 [17.4-33.9] vs. 19.8 [14.0-28.8], p<0.03). However, no differences in BMI or baseline CDAI were observed between patients who achieved LDA after 6 months in TCZ group., Conclusions: Obesity influences the extent of LDA/remission in patients treated with TNFi, but not in patients treated with TCZ, probably because of underlying pathophysiological mechanisms intrinsic to the production of proinflammatory adi-pokines. Therefore, therapeutic strategies with a mechanism of action other than TNF inhibition would be more suitable for obese patients.

Immunogenicity related to treatment with TNF inhibitors (TNFi) is one of the causes for the decreased attainment of clinical response in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The B-cell activating factor (BAFF) may be playing a role in the development of immunogenicity. The objective of this study was to analyse the association of baseline concentration of serum B-cell activating factor (BAFF) with immunogenicity after 6 months of TNFi treatment. A total of 127 patients with RA starting a TNFi (infliximab, adalimumab, certolizumab pegol or golimumab) were followed-up for 6 months. Serum samples were obtained at baseline and at 6 months and anti-drug antibody (ADA) and BAFF concentrations were measured. Logistic regression models were employed in order to analyse the association between BAFF concentrations and immunogenicity. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to determine the BAFF concentrations with a greater likelihood of showing immunogenicity association. At 6 months, 31 patients (24%) developed ADA. A significant interaction between the age and baseline BAFF concentration was found for the development of ADA (Wald chi-square value = 5.30; p = 0.02); therefore, subsequent results were stratified according to mean age (≤ / > 55 years). Baseline serum BAFF concentration was independently associated with ADA development only in patients over 55 years (OR = 1.51; 95% CI 1.03-2.21). Baseline serum BAFF ≥ 1034 pg/mL predicted the presence of ADA at 6 months (AUC = 0.81; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69-0.93; p = 0.001; positive likelihood ratio = 3.7). In conclusion, our results suggest that the association of BAFF concentration and immunogenicity depends on the patient's age. Baseline serum BAFF concentration predicts the presence of ADA within 6 months of TNFi therapy in older patients with RA.

Background: TNF inhibitors (TNFis) are widely used for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), although the response rates to this therapy in patients with RA remains heterogeneous and < 50% achieve remission (REM). Objective: To analyze baseline peripheral blood leukocytes profiles in order to search for biomarkers identifying patients who will most likely not achieve REM under TNFi treatment. Methods: A prospective bi-center pilot study including 98 RA patients treated with TNFis and followed-up during 6 months. Patients were classified according to DAS28 as follows: those who achieved REM (DAS28 ≤ 2.6) and those who did not (DAS28 > 2.6) at 6 months after starting TNFis. These rates were also assessed by simplified disease activity index (SDAI ≤ 3.3 and SDAI > 3.3, respectively). Peripheral blood immune cells were studied by flow cytometry before treatment initiation. Results: At 6 months, 61 or 80% of patients did not achieve REM by DAS28 or SDAI, respectively. Basal leukocyte profiles differed between REM vs. non-REM patients. Non-REM patients showed lower percentages of total and naïve B cells at baseline than REM subjects. A B lymphocyte/CD4+ lymphocyte ratio (BL/CD4 ratio) <0.2 clearly associated with a higher probability of non-REM status based on DAS28 at 6 months (OR = 9.2, p = 0.006). These data were confirmed when patient response was evaluated by SDAI index. Conclusion: Our results strongly suggest that BL/CD4 ratio could be considered as a useful biomarker for the early identification of non-remitters to TNFi in clinical practice., (Copyright © 2020 Rodríguez-Martín, Nieto-Gañán, Hernández-Breijo, Sobrino, García-Hoz, Bachiller, Martínez-Feito, Navarro-Compán, Lapuente-Suanzes, Bonilla, Pascual-Salcedo, Roy, Jurado, Nozal, Vázquez-Díaz, Balsa, Villar and Plasencia-Rodríguez.)

To investigate the effect of concomitant conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) with adalimumab or infliximab on maintaining serum drug and clinical outcomes after the first year of treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Second, to assess the influence of methotrexate (MTX) dose on these outcomes. Ninety-two patients with RA starting infliximab (n = 67) or adalimumab (n = 25) tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) with available drug levels and clinical improvement assessment (European League Against Rheumatism [EULAR] response) after 12 months were included. Patients were grouped according to concomitant csDMARD use: (i) TNFi monotherapy; (ii) TNFi+MTX; (iii) TNFi with csDMARDs other than MTX (TNFi+OD). Patients receiving MTX were also classified by dose as < 15 mg/week (TNFi+MTX<15) and ≥ 15 mg/week (TNFi+MTX≥15). Logistic regression analyses were employed. More TNFi+MTX patients had circulating serum TNFi at 12 months (71% TNFi+MTX vs. 20% TNFi+OD vs. 9% TNFi monotherapy). Of these, the probability of maintaining serum TNFi levels was twice (OR 2.3; p = 0.06) than that of patients without MTX. However, statistically significant results were observed only for the highest MTX dose (OR 4.9; p = 0.02). Most patients achieving good EULAR response were treated with TNFi+MTX (81%). The probability of achieving this response was three times higher in patients within the TNFi+MTX group (OR 3.4; p = 0.03); however, no differences were found with regard to MTX dose. The persistence of serum TNFi and the probability of achieving clinical response are influenced by MTX but not by OD in patients with RA treated with infliximab or adalimumab.