Search

Background: The arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is the preferred vascular access for hemodialysis (HD) treatment and preservation of a stable vascular access is crucial. Long term Far Infrared Radiation (FIR) has been found to increase access flow together with an enhanced maturation and patency of the AVF. The acute effects of FIR on access flow have been sparsely described and the results are contradictory, perhaps due to differences in measurement conditions and other factors of importance for access flow., Methods: Twenty patients in HD with an AVF were included. Each patient was randomized to receive either FIR (FIR group) or no FIR (control group). The acute changes in access flow were investigated in both groups on the second dialysis day of the week and during the first 1.5 h of the dialysis session. Concomitant changes in hemodynamic parameters of importance for access flow were also explored., Results: There was no significant change in access flow in the FIR group compared with the control group (median (Interquartile Range)) (-10 (-413.8; 21.3) ml/min vs -17.5 (-83.8; 76.3) ml/min, p  = 0.58). There was no significant difference in any of the hemodynamic parameters between the FIR and the control group; cardiac output (-0.7 (-1.2; -0.2) l/min vs -0.4 (-0.9; 0.1) l/min, p  = 0.58), cardiac index (-0.3 (-0.5; -0.1)) l/min/m 2 vs -0.3 (-0.4; 0) l/min/m 2 , p  = 0.68), mean arterial pressure (5.5 (-1.8; 8.4) mmHg vs 1.5 (-3; 6.3) mmHg, p  = 0.35) and total peripheral resistance (2 (1.8; 3.4) mmHg × min/l vs 1 (-0.3; 3.1) mmHg × min/l, p  = 0.12)., Conclusion: In this trial, with a highly standardized set-up, one session of FIR did not result in any acute changes in access flow. This was not due to differences in the hemodynamic parameters between the groups., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Introduction: The age and number of comorbidities in the hemodialysis population has increased over time. This may influence the construction and survival of the arteriovenous fistula (AVF). The present study explored the incidence and survival of AVFs over a period of 39 years., Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted based on Danish registries. Incident hemodialysis patients between 1977 and 2015 were included. The incidence of AVF and factors associated with the construction of an AVF were described. Risk factors for AVF survival and repair were explored by Kaplan Meier and Cox proportional hazard analysis., Results: The total number of arteriovenous accesses (AVF and arteriovenous grafts) were 10,187 and there were 4201 central venous catheters (CVC). No significant difference in the proportion of AVFs during the 39 years was seen. Age and renal diagnosis did not influence the proportion of AVFs. Patients with CVCs were found to have a significantly higher prevalence of comorbidities ( p  < 0.01). AVF survival remained stable during the 39 years. The first constructed AVF had the best survival, 35% still functioning after 15 years. Factors such as brachiocephalic AVF, female sex, and diabetic nephropathy increased the risk of AVF failure (Odds Ratio (OR): 2.46, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) (2.29-2.65), 1.17 (1.10-1.25), and 1.21 (1.12-1.3)), respectively., Conclusion: Despite an older dialysis population, the proportion and survival of the AVF in the Danish dialysis population has not changed, probably because of increased awareness of AVF as the first choice of vascular access and improved surveillance, surgery, and repair., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Introduction: There is a substantial risk of developing stenosis and dysfunction in the arteriovenous fistula (AVF) in patients on hemodialysis (HD). Far infrared radiation (FIR) is a non-invasive local intervention with a potentially beneficial effect on AVF patency. The underlying mechanism is not clear. It was hypothesized that a single FIR treatment reduces factors of inflammation and promotes endothelial vasodilators in the AVF., Methods: Forty HD patients with an AVF were included in an open-label intervention study. Patients were randomized to receive either FIR (FIR group) or no FIR (control group). Blood samples were drawn directly from the AVF and from a peripheral vein in the non-AVF arm before (T0) and 40 min after (T40) treatment during a HD session. The changes [median (interquartile range)] in circulating factors of inflammation, endothelial function and vasoreactivity during FIR were measured., Results: In the AVF a single FIR treatment during dialysis resulted in a significantly diminished decrease in soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule, sVCAM [-31.6 (-54.3; 22.1) vs -89.9 (-121.6; -29.3), P = .005] and soluble intercellular adhesion molecule, sICAM [-24.2 (-43.5; 25.3) vs -49 (-79.9; -11.6), P = .02] compared with the control group. Other factors, such as interleukins, nitrite, nitrate and tumor necrosis factor 1, also declined during dialysis, but with no significant differences related to FIR in either the AVF or the non-AVF arm., Conclusion: A single FIR treatment attenuated the decrease in sVCAM and sICAM in the AVF compared with a control group during HD. Findings do not support the hypothesis of a vaso-protective effect of FIR. The long-term effects of FIR on the AVF are unknown., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the ERA.)