Search

Objective: Tibial interventions for critical limb ischemia are now commonplace. Restenosis and occlusion remain barriers to durability after intervention. The aim of this study was to examine the patient-centered outcomes of open and endovascular reintervention for symptomatic recurrent disease after a primary isolated tibial endovascular intervention., Methods: A database of patients undergoing isolated primary lower extremity tibial endovascular interventions between 2006 and 2016 was retrospectively queried. Patients with recurrent critical ischemia (Rutherford 4 and 5) were identified. Outcomes in this cohort were analyzed, and three groups were defined: endovascular reintervention (ie, a repeated tibial or pedal endovascular intervention), bypass (bypass to a tibial or pedal vessel), and primary amputation (ie, above- or below-knee amputation) on the ipsilateral leg. Patient-oriented outcomes of clinical efficacy (absence of recurrent signs or symptoms of critical ischemia, maintenance of ambulation, and absence of major amputation), amputation-free survival (survival without major amputation), and freedom from major adverse limb events (above-ankle amputation of the index limb or major reintervention, such as new bypass graft or jump or interposition graft revision) were evaluated after the reintervention., Results: There were 1134 patients (56% male; average age, 59 years) who underwent primary tibial intervention for critical ischemia, and 54% presented with symptomatic restenosis and occlusion. Of the 513 patients with recurrent disease, 58% presented with rest pain and the remainder with ulceration. A repeated tibial endovascular intervention was performed in 64%, open bypass in 19%, and below-knee amputation in 17%. Bypass was employed in patients with a good target vessel, venous conduit, and good pedal runoff. Patient-centered outcomes were better in the bypass group compared with the reintervention group (amputation-free survival, 45% ± 9% vs 27% ± 9% [P < .01]; major adverse limb events, 50% ± 9% vs 31% ± 9% [P < .05]; clinical efficacy, 60% ± 7% vs 30% ± 9% [P < .01], mean ± standard error of the mean at 5 years)., Conclusions: Tibial interventions for critical ischemia are associated with a high rate of reintervention. In patients with good target vessel, venous conduit, and good pedal runoff, bypass appears more durable than repeated tibial endovascular intervention., (Copyright © 2018 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aortobifemoral bypass is the standard method for revascularization of aortoiliac occlusive disease but is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Laparoscopic aortic reconstruction eliminates the large incision but is limited by the cumbersome nature of laparoscopic instrumentation. A robotic system (da Vinci Computer-Enhanced Robotic Surgical System, Intuitive Surgical, Mountain View, CA) has been developed that allows the surgeon to suture in the same manner as in open procedures. The authors report the first case of an aortic reconstruction for occlusive disease performed using the da Vinci system. A 53-year-old woman presented with gangrene of the left great toe. Angiography revealed distal aortic occlusive disease and occlusion of the common iliac arteries bilaterally. Dissection of the aorta was performed by a transabdominal-retroperitoneal approach modified from Dion (J Vasc Surg 26:128-132, 1997). With use of laparoscopic techniques, the abdominal contents were retracted to the patient's right side while the kidney and ureter remained in the retroperitoneum. The aorta was isolated from the bifurcation proximally to the left renal vein. The patient was anticoagulated, and the aorta was clamped below the left renal artery and proximal to the bifurcation. The da Vinci robotic system was placed on the patient's right side, and an extruded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) graft was passed into the retroperitoneum. While seated at a computer console viewing the operative field on a screen, the surgeon used robotic instruments to fashion an arteriotomy and complete an end-to-side aortic anastomosis using ePTFE suture. The left groin was opened and the aortic graft passed down to the groin. The reconstruction was completed by performing a left-to-right femoro-femoral bypass in standard, open fashion. The procedure was completed in 8 hours with an aortic clamp time of 65 minutes and a 500 cc blood loss. The patient was extubated in the operating room, ate a regular diet on postoperative day 2, and was discharged on postoperative day 4 without complications. Return to normal activities occurred 2.5 weeks postoperatively. The da Vinci robotic system facilitated creation of the aortic anastomosis and shortened aortic clamp time over that achieved with laparoscopic techniques. Robot-assisted laparoscopic aortofemoral bypass should decrease the morbidity and mortality of aortic reconstruction, while providing a durable solution to aortoiliac occlusive disease.