Search

To investigate the neural processing of emotion in right and left temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE), we monitored EEG during neutral and emotionally positive and negative auditory stimulation. Left TLE patients displayed increased right lateralization and a negative emotional stimulus rating bias, while right TLE patients did not. This EEG arousal and negative affect may reflect deactivated inhibition of the right hemisphere, symptomatically expressed as arousal and anxiety. Failure to increase lateralization to emotional stimuli in right TLE may reflect compromised emotional attention/arousal centers in the right hemisphere. Results support a two-dimensional theory of the neural processing of emotion.

Arousal and anxiety responses to stressful stimulation are products of multiple factors that may include the physiological, behavioral, cognitive, affective, trait, and state components of our six-system model, as well as mediational and non-mediational perspectives. Within the context of this model, the present experiment examined the effects of prior exposure to neutral stimuli on arousal and anxiety responses to stress. High and low trait-anxious participants were randomly assigned to one of three prior exposure conditions in which they were exposed to stressful stimuli following exposure to: (a) neutral, non-stressful stimulation in the same modality (the Intramodality Prior Exposure or IPE experimental condition); (b) neutral stimuli in a different modality (the Cross-modality Prior Exposure or CPE control condition); or (c) a rest period (the Stress Only or SO control condition). Results showed that low trait anxious subjects had consistently larger arousal and anxiety responses to stress than did highs and that prior exposure to certain same-modality neutral stimuli reduced responses to subsequent stressors. In addition, arousal was greater in response to cognitive than to affective and in response to non-mediational than mediational conditions. Results are discussed in terms of the inverted-U arousal function and of the six-system model and its implications for understanding anxiety and arousal.

The present experiment was a test of a new six-system model of anxiety, which includes physiological, behavioral, cognitive, affective, trait, and state components of anxiety and also differentiates between direct and mediated responses. The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory was used to screen 795 undergraduates at the University of Maryland. Of the 52 subjects chosen, half were high trait anxious and half low. The two groups were further divided into high and low situational stress conditions. Subjects in the high-stress condition were exposed to two types of stressful cognitive and two types of stressful affective tasks. Subjects in the low-stress condition were exposed to the same four tasks with the stressful aspect removed. Prior state anxiety and cognitive or affective sensitivity were also considered. It was found that the most influential factor in resultant arousal was situational stress. Trait anxiety, state anxiety, and cognitive vs. affective sensitivity also significantly influenced both direct and mediated physiological and subjective anxiety responses. In addition, rather than leading to increased arousal, as hypothesized, the presence of trait and state anxiety reduced arousal under certain conditions.

Both theory and evidence suggest that right temporal lobectomy (RTL) patients show hypoarousal and left temporal lobectomy (LTL) patients show relative hyperarousal (Davidson, Fedio, Smith, Aurielle, & Martin, 1992). However, we hypothesized that these differences occur only under passive, nonevaluative stimulus conditions. The present study employed, instead, conditions of performance evaluation. We recorded the skin conductance responses (SCRs) and reaction times (RTs) of RTLs, LTLs, and normal controls (NCs) during easy and difficult trial blocks on a target-detection task, with auditory success/failure feedback. We found that LTLs exhibited relative hypoarousal and retarded RTs and that RTLs were normally aroused following success feedback. These results demonstrated that the arousal level of LTLs is contingent on stimulus conditions, thus calling into question the theory that this group is generally subject to hyperarousal. The two-dimensional theory of the neural processing of emotional experience partially explains our data.

The purpose of the present study was to better understand both the lateralized hemispheric processing of emotion and the differential neural processing of arousal in extraverts and introverts. We preselected right-handed male and female extraverts and introverts who were high in emotional lability. Each subject was exposed to two positive and two negative emotional stimuli under each of three counterbalanced conditions, including affective, cognitive, and neutral, while EEG and electrodermal activity (EDA) were recorded. Results showed that introverts are more aroused and that extraversion interacts with gender to produce differentiated patterns of lateralized neural activity. In addition, affective conditions produced higher levels of arousal than did cognitive or neutral conditions, particularly in the left hemisphere and under negative as opposed to positive stimuli. Finally, the hemispherically differentiated processing of positive and negative stimuli was affected by the contextual conditions under which they were experienced.

The present study extended testing of our biobehavioral model describing the effects of arousal and caffeine to include an examination of gender differences and their interactions with habitual and acute caffeine ingestion. Males and females selected as high or low habitual caffeine users were randomly assigned to receive either caffeine or a placebo and exposed to novel and repetitive recall tasks and to simple auditory stimuli. Electrodermal activity and recall task performance were recorded. The four major factors examined, including habitual caffeine use, acute ingestion, gender, and stimulus novelty, affected behavior, physiology, or both. Results showed that habitual caffeine usage systematically affected tonic arousal (skin conductance level) and improved recall task performance. Acute caffeine ingestion increased phasic arousal (skin conductance response amplitude) and reduced habituation rates. Gender interacted with other factors to significantly affect both tonic and phasic arousal, and females performed better than males on the recall tasks. These results were partially supportive of the theoretical model, and further work is needed to examine the interactions of acute and chronic caffeine intake with gender and novelty.

The purpose of the present study was to increase our understanding of the differential hemispheric processing of arousal and habituation. Subjects were unilateral temporal lobectomy patients and controls. Each was exposed to an arousal/habituation task consisting of a series of tones and an auditory discrimination paradigm. Electrodermal activity was recorded from the left and right hands throughout. Results provide evidence for a state of hypoarousal in right temporal patients and some support for hyperarousability in lefts. This is consistent with data showing that right hemisphere damage is associated with inattention and denial and left hemisphere damage with hypervigilance and anxiety. The concept of laterally differentiated mediation of arousal and habituation was supported.

A recently proposed model of the biobehavioral effects of caffeine suggests that acute ingestion impacts physiology and behavior differentially depending on the level of habitual usage of the drug. Acute ingestion and habitual usage are particularly expected to affect arousal and attentional processes. Subjects in the present study were preselected for high and low habitual caffeine use, given caffeine or a placebo, exposed to white noise or no white noise, and asked to perform on several tasks. Included were an arousal/habituation task (pure tones), reaction time, paired associates, anagrams, and vigilance. Electrodermal activity and performance were recorded. As predicted, virtually all effects were on the arousal/habituation and attentional (vigilance) tasks. Both acute ingestion and habitual use increased tonic EDA, and chronic use also reduced phasic responding, especially in the presence of a strong habituating stimulus. Both acute and habitual use also liberalized the vigilance response criterion, in that subjects risked more false alarms in order to attain more hits. In addition, habitual use increased sensitivity and reduced accuracy, and acute ingestion increased vigilance response time in the presence of white noise. Overall, the model was partially supported by these early results, though considerable further research is needed.

Caffeine has been shown to affect both physiological functioning and certain aspects of performance. These effects are typically attributed to a simple increase in general arousal. The present study was based on the theory that the effects of caffeine are actually multidimensional. Specifically, we hypothesized that the drug raises arousal, acts to maintain elevated arousal under conditions otherwise conductive to habituation, and enhances the impact of situational and psychological sources of arousal. Subjects were given caffeine (300 mg) or placebo and white noise or no noise and exposed to a series of pure tones and two Backwards Recall Tasks, one novel, the other repetitive. Electrodermal activity (EDA) and task performance were recorded. Caffeine increased arousal as measured by EDA. It also acted to slow habituation during repetitive stimulation, thus maintaining heightened arousal. Finally, it enhanced the effects of novel stimulation, which also independently raised arousal. These results support a multidimensional theory of caffeine effects and provide some understanding of the popularity of caffeine as a psychotropic agent.

The present study was concerned with the effects of conflict type and shock stress on arousal and conflict resolution. Subjects were randomly assigned to either stress (random shock) or non-stress conditions. Each subject was exposed to three trials of each of the four Lewinian conflict types and three control trials, interspersed among additional non-conflict trials. Resolution performance was assessed in terms of speed of resolution and error frequency. Phasic electrodermal responsivity served as a measure of arousal. Results supported several hypotheses. It was found that both stress and conflict increased the magnitude of electrodermal responses and that larger responses occurred under more difficult conflicts. In addition, increased conflict difficulty produced lower speeds, and stress increased errors. Finally, stress caused a greater increase in error frequency on conflict than on control trials. Results were discussed in terms of arousal and stress hypotheses found in the theories of Lewin and Dollard & Miller.

Forty-eight subjects were requested to remember three idiosyncratic emotion-laden memories (eliciting Anger, Anxiety and Contentment). Objective (change in tonic skin conductance) and subjective (rated success at achieving each emotion) measures of arousal were taken for each condition as well as subjectively rated use of cognitive content (verbal and visuospatial modes). An "Affect Cognizance Index" (group-calculated T-score for objective arousal minus group-calculated T-score for subjective arousal) correlated positively with a measure of Type A Behavior during Anxiety and Contentment but not Anger, with or without cognitive effort statistically controlled. However, cognitive content may influence affect cognizance independent of its relationship with the Type A syndrome. Those subjects reporting greater verbal content showed augmented experience of affect-induced arousal during Anger. Visuospatial content augmented subjective experience of affect-induced arousal during Contentment.