1. Self-reported stressors, symptom complaints and psychobiological functioning I: Cardiovascular stress reactivity.
- Author
-
Vingerhoets AJ, Ratliff-Crain J, Jabaaij L, Menges LJ, and Baum A
- Subjects
- Adaptation, Psychological physiology, Adult, Awareness physiology, Electrocardiography, Heart Rate physiology, Humans, Life Style, Male, Middle Aged, Personality Inventory, Psychophysiologic Disorders psychology, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Somatoform Disorders psychology, Stress, Psychological physiopathology, Type A Personality, Arousal physiology, Cardiovascular System innervation, Psychophysiologic Disorders physiopathology, Sick Role, Somatoform Disorders physiopathology, Stress, Psychological complications, Sympathetic Nervous System physiopathology
- Abstract
Taking into account neuroticism and lifestyle variables (smoking and alcohol consumption), cardiovascular and psychological reactions to stressful films were studied in four groups of subjects selected on self-reported levels of recent stressor load and symptom complaints (low-load/low-symptoms: low-load/high-symptoms; high-load/low-symptoms; high-load/high-symptoms). The films were known either to stimulate or to depress cardiovascular activity. The results showed that psychological reactions (distress; deactivation; openness/involvement) were associated with group membership and condition. In addition, high-symptom subjects were characterized by faster resting heart rates and smaller ECG T-wave amplitudes (TWAs), reflective of greater sympathetic tone on the myocard. Further, low-symptom subjects, in particular those labeled as stress-resistant (high-load/low-symptoms), exhibited larger myocardial responses to the cardiovascular-stimulating films than did high-symptom subjects. Low-symptom subjects showed predicted variations in physiological responses to the different films, whereas the responses by the high-symptom subjects showed lesser variation across films. It is concluded that the cardiovascular responses of low-symptom subjects more accurately followed the energetic demands of the body, whereas the high-symptom subjects were in a comparatively enduring state of arousal.
- Published
- 1996
- Full Text
- View/download PDF