Search

Background: In a sample of patients in clinical occupational medicine we have demonstrated that an upper limb neurological examination can reliably identify patterns of findings suggesting upper limb focal neuropathies. This further study aimed at approaching the diagnostic accuracy of the examination., Methods: 82 limbs were semi-quantitatively assessed by two blinded examiners (strength in 14 individual muscles, sensibility in 7 homonymous territories, and mechanosensitivity at 10 locations along nerves). Based on the topography of nerves and their muscular and sensory innervation we defined 10 neurological patterns each suggesting a localized nerve affliction. Information on complaints (pain, weakness and/or numbness/tingling) collected by others served as a reference for comparison. The relation between the presence of pattern(s) and complaints was assessed by kappa-statistics. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive/negative predictive values were calculated, and pre-test odds were compared to post-test probability., Results: The two examiners identified pattern(s) suggesting focal neuropathy in 34/36 out of 38 symptomatic limbs, respectively (kappa = 0.70/0.75), with agreement in 28 limbs. Out of 44 non-symptomatic limbs the examiners agreed on absence of any pattern in 38 limbs. With concordance between the examiners with regard to the presence or absence of any pattern, the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were 0.73, 0.86, 0.93 and 0.90, respectively. While the pre-test odds for a limb to be symptomatic amounted to 0.46 the post-test probability was 0.81. For each examiner the post-test probability was 0.87 and 0.88, respectively., Conclusion: The improved diagnostic confidence is an indication of one aspect of construct validity of the physical examination. For determination of clinical feasibility of the examination further studies are required, most importantly 1) studies of validity by means of comparison with additional references and 2) studies of the potential benefit that can be attained from its use.

Background: Upper limb disorders (ULDs) are common, and so are the difficulties with regard to their specific diagnoses. According to diagnostic consensus criteria, specific diagnoses include neuropathy and muscular- and connective-tissue disorders (MCDs). There is a need for valid objective diagnostic tools to reveal underlying mechanisms for specific diagnoses. Objective: To investigate the possible differences in vibration perception threshold (VPT) and tolerance to suprathreshold stimulation (STS) between controls and specific diagnostic ULD patient groups with uni- and bilateral neuropathy and/or MCD. Methods: In 161 ULD patients and 40 controls, the VPT of the median, ulnar, and radial nerves innervating the hand was examined by vibrometry using the “method of limits”. The tolerance to STS of the anterior forearm was tested in 128 of the patients and all controls. Results: The ULD patients in all diagnostic groups had significantly higher VPT ( P<0.05) in all the nerves in limbs, with and without diagnoses compared with controls. Only patient groups defined with neuropathy demonstrated significantly higher VPT in the limb with diagnoses compared with the contralateral limb without diagnoses. The highest VPTs were found in the patient group with unilateral neuropathy and MCD, and for the radial nerve, VPT was significantly higher than that for patients with unilateral MCD alone. These findings were confirmed by almost similar findings in STS responses. Conclusions: The ULD patients generally demonstrated increased VPT compared with controls, indicating a neurogenous component independent of specific ULD diagnosis. Contralateral significant findings in limbs without diagnoses compared with controls indicate central neurogenous affection and/or the possibility of certain exposures elevating VPT before a positive status of a limb diagnosis is attained. Significantly higher VPT values in limbs with neuropathy diagnoses compared with limbs without and not in MCD alone, may indicate peripheral sensibilization or nerve affection only in the group with a specific diagnosis of neuropathy. These findings underline the importance of specific diagnoses among ULD patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Manual muscle testing has been termed a "lost art" and is often considered to be of minor value. The aim of this investigation was to study the inter-rater reliability of manual examination of the maximal voluntary strength in a sample of upper limb muscles. Patients and methods The material consisted of a series of 41 consecutive patients (82 limbs) who had been referred to a clinic of occupational medicine for various reasons. Two examiners who were blinded as to patient-related information classified 14 muscles in terms of normal or reduced strength. In order to optimize the evaluation, the individual strength was assessed simultaneously on the right and left sides with the limbs in standardized positions that were specific for each muscle. Information on upper limb complaints (pain, weakness and/or numbness/tingling) collected by two other examiners resulted in 38 limbs being classified as symptomatic and 44 as asymptomatic. For each muscle the inter-rater reliability of the assessment of strength into normal or reduced was estimated by κ-statistics. In addition, the odds ratio for the relation to symptoms of the definition in agreement of strength was calculated. Results The median κ-value for strength in the muscles examined was 0.54 (0.25-0.72). With a median odds ratio of 4.0 (2.5-7.7), reduced strength was significantly associated with the presence of symptoms. Interpretation This study suggests that manual muscle testing in upper limb disorders has diagnostic potential. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]