4 results on '"transformacije"'
Search Results
2. SOCIALLY ENGAGED ARCHITECTURE OF THE 1950s AND ITS TRANSFORMATIONS The Example of Zagreb's Workers' University.
- Author
-
Galjer, Jasna and Lončar, Sanja
- Subjects
ARCHITECTURAL drawing ,ARCHITECTURE ,OPEN universities ,PUBLIC spaces ,INSTITUTION building ,EMPLOYEES ,PUBLIC architecture ,SPACE (Architecture) - Abstract
Copyright of Ethnological Forum / Etnoloska Tribina is the property of Etnoloska Tribina / Ethnological Forum and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Društveno angažirana arhitektura 1950-ih godina i njezine transformacije. Primjer zagrebačkog Radničkog sveučilišta
- Author
-
Sanja Lončar and Jasna Galjer
- Subjects
Cultural Studies ,radnička i narodna sveučilišta ,media_common.quotation_subject ,Identity (social science) ,Modernization theory ,workers' and people's universities ,transformations ,Politics ,Public space ,Institution ,društveno angažirana arhitektura ,Sociology ,Architecture ,HUMANISTIC SCIENCES. History of Art ,Sociocultural evolution ,socijalizam ,socialism ,media_common ,modernism ,socially engaged architecture ,business.industry ,Social environment ,Public relations ,transformacije ,Anthropology ,HUMANISTIC SCIENCES. Ethnology and Anthropology ,HUMANISTIČKE ZNANOSTI. Etnologija i antropologija ,modernizam ,HUMANISTIČKE ZNANOSTI. Povijest umjetnosti ,business - Abstract
This paper investigates the links between architecture and its social purpose and focuses specifically on the building and institution known today as the Public Open University Zagreb (Pučko otvoreno učilište Zagreb – POUZ), which was previously called Moša Pijade Workers' (and People's) University (Radničko (i narodno) sveučilište "Moša Pijade" – RANS). The paper examines the innovative and experimental nature of the architectural concept of socially engaged architecture as part of the societal modernisation of the 1950s and 1960s, as well as changes to its function up to the present post-socialist condition. The authors discuss the complex relationship between employees, beneficiaries, programmes and the architectural design and the political, economic and social context. The aim is to explore sociocultural categories and how culture, work, education and the city interacted with one another during different time periods. By using theoretical and methodological insights gleaned from cultural anthropological approaches to space and architecture, the paper demonstrates how the identity, significance and values ascribed to the production of public space were shaped, medialized and modified through time., U radu se istražuju poveznice između arhitekture i njezine društvene uloge na primjeru zgrade i ustanove Pučkog otvorenog učilišta Zagreb (POUZ), nekada Radničkog (i narodnog) sveučilišta "Moša Pijade" (RANS). Težište je na inovativnom i eksperimentalnom karakteru arhitektonskog koncepta društveno angažirane arhitekture u kontekstu modernizacije društva 1950-ih i 1960-ih godina, kao i na promjenama njezine funkcije u postsocijalističkom razdoblju. Autorice istražuju kompleksan odnos zaposlenika, korisnika, programa i arhitektonskog dizajna s jedne, te političkog, ekonomskog i društvenog konteksta s druge strane. Cilj je istražiti sociokulturne kategorije i odnose između kulture, rada, obrazovanja i grada u različitim razdobljima. Pritom se, korištenjem kulturnoantropoloških teorijskih i metodoloških pristupa prostoru i arhitekturi, razmatra kako su se identitet, važnost i vrijednosti koje su pripisivane javnom prostoru oblikovali, medijalizirali i mijenjali tijekom vremena.
- Published
- 2019
4. Fortifikacije rimskih gradova na obalnom području provincije Dalmacije
- Author
-
Sekso, Ruža and Maršić, Dražen
- Subjects
fortifikacije ,HUMANISTIČKE ZNANOSTI. Arheologija ,Arhitektura ,transformation ,tehnike ,udc:72(043.3) ,structures ,transformacije ,strukture ,city ,grad ,Architecture ,fortifications ,HUMANISTIC SCIENCES. Archeology ,techniques - Abstract
Fortifikacijsko graditeljstvo predstavlja značajan segment kulturnog naslijeđa svake povijesne epohe, jer na oblikovanje i koncepciju fortifikacija utječu svi elementi i faktori zaslužni za globalni razvoj nekog društva. Brojna naselja na promatranom području pokazuju kontinuitet utvrđivanja, počevši od protourbane, preko helenističke i rimske, do kasnoantičke faze i pokazatelj su transformacije, redovito povezane s mijenjanjem kulturno-etničke podloge. U tom kontekstu najznačajniji su ostatci fortifikacijskih struktura u Kuriku, Apsoru, Jaderu, Aseriji, Varvariji, Saloni, Naroni i Lješu. Najslabije su poznate fortifikacije gradova koji dolaskom pod rimsku upravu napuštaju povišen gradinski položaj i spuštaju se u podnožje što je slučaj kod većine kvarnerskih i podvelebitskih gradova. Na njima su otkriveni manji segmenti prapovijesnih i kasnoantičkih obrambenih struktura, što otvara pitanje postojanja rimskih. Poseban problem u rekonstrukciji slijeda promjena na gradskim bedemima nastao je uslijed potpune namjerne devastacije što je bila sudbina fortifikacija Tarsatike, Arbe, Senije, Argirunta, Epidaura, Budve i Bara. Za proučavanje kronologije nastanka i promjena na rimskim gradskim bedemima osim epigrafskih i ostalih materijalnih ostatka temeljno je poznavanje tehnika gradnje i obrambenih inovacija koje se uvode razvojem ratne tehnologije. Osnovni materijal za gradnju bio je kamen što je ujedno odredilo i tehnike gradnje njemu prilagođene. Na promatranom prostoru dominantna tehnika bilaje opus auadratum stoje rezultat povijesnog naslijeđa i govori u prilog tomu da su gotovo svi, kasnije rimski gradovi, imali dugu tradiciju utvrđivanja. Rimska inovacija opus incertum zastupljena je uglavnom kao rezultat novopodignutih segmenata i naknadnih adaptacija. Razvoj ratnih strojeva potaknuoje kreativnost u rješavanju gradskih fortifikacija koje se dodatno ojačavaju kulama, kontraforima, paralelnim zidovima, dijatihizmama (poprečnim zidovima) i protihizmama (predzigovima). Analiza dostupne građe i novija istraživanja uz terensku autopsiju pokazuju da je riječ o kompleksnijim promjenama u odnosu na podatke prisutne u stručnoj literaturi. Navedene su brojne situacije koje mogu biti predmet rasprave i predloženo moguće razriješenje temeljem dostupnih znanja. Poseban problem predstavljaju interpretacija dvostrukih bedema u Tarsatici i Kuriku, postojanje dijatihizme u Apsoru i Naroni, datiranje propugnakula u Jaderu i Saloni, te određivanje razvojnih faza u Varvariji, Aseriji i Lješu. Fortification architecture represents a relevant segment of the cultural heritage of any historical epoch because its shaping and concept are under the influence of all the elements and factors responsible for global development of any society. Numerous settlements on the teritory under observation show continuity in building fortifications to begin with the protourban through Hellenic and Roman till the late antiquity and they show the transformation usually related to the change of cultural and ethnic basis. In that context the most significant remains of the fortification structures are in Kurik, Apsor, Jader, Aseria, Varvaria, Salona, Narona and Ljes. The least known are the fortifications of the cities which under the Roman administration abandon elevated position of the hill-fort and descend onto the foothill which is the case of most cities in Kvarner Bay and those situated under the Velebit mountain. In them some smaller segments of prehistorical and late antiquity defense structures put the existence of similar Roman structures in question. Particular problem in reconstruction of the change sequence on city walls results from the total and intentional devastation which were fate of Tarsatika, Arba, Senia, Argirunt, Epidaur, Budva and Bar fortification. To study chronology of origin and changes on the Roman city walls besides the epigraphic and other material remains the knowledge of building tecniques and defense innovations introduced by the war technology development is fundamental. The basic building material was stone which also defines building techniques suited to it. On the observed teritory the predominant technique was opus quadratum which was the result of the historical heritage and adds to the thought that almost all, the Roman cities included, had a long tradition of fortifying. The Roman innovation of opus incertum is present mainly as a result of newly built segments and subsequent adaptations. The development of war machines inspired the creativity in building the city fortifications which get additional towers, buttresses, parallel walls, transversal walls (diatichism), and outter walls (bulwark)-protychisms. The analysis of the accessible material and the recent research with on site autopsy show more complex changes as opposed to the data from the literature. Numerous situations which can be a subject-matter of a dissertation are pointed out and possible options based on available knowledge have been offered. Special problems are the interpretations of the double walls in Tarsatica and Kurik, the existence of diatichism in Apsor and Narona, dating of propugnaculum in Jader and Salona as well as defining the development stages in Varvaria, Aseria and Ljes.
- Published
- 2017
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.