Search

Introduction: Intracranial arachnoid cysts are a common incidental finding; however presentation with cyst rupture is a recognised complication. Patients are advised to avoid contact sports to reduce the risk of cyst rupture but the risk of rupture is not currently known. The aim of this study is to describe a single institution's experience of managing ruptured intra-cranial arachnoid cysts., Method: A retrospective case note review of all patients admitted to a single institution with a ruptured intra-cranial arachnoid cyst between 2005 and 2016 (inclusive). Medical records were reviewed for demographics, history of trauma, surgical treatment and radiological evidence of cyst rupture., Results: Fourteen patients were identified for inclusion with an average age of 23.4 years (range 7-57) and 10 (71%) were male. Nine patients (64%) had a documented history of head trauma. Eleven patients (78.6%) required neurosurgical intervention which included hygroma/haematoma evacuation only ( n  = 5), haematoma evacuation with cyst fenestration ( n  = 4) and cyst fenestration/shunting only ( n  = 2). Twelve patients (85%) experienced full recovery and the remaining two had persisting headaches or neurological symptoms., Discussion: Cyst rupture remains an uncommon cause for presentation with arachnoid cysts. However the majority are associated with head trauma and thus current advice to avoid contact sports seems justified.

Background: Intracranial arachnoid cysts (AC) are benign, cerebrospinal fluid filled spaces within the arachnoid layer of the meninges. Neurosurgical intervention in children and young adults has been extensively studied, but the optimal strategy in the elderly remains unclear. Therefore, we performed a single center retrospective study combined with a systematic review of the literature to compare cystoperitoneal (CP) shunting with other surgical approaches in the elderly cohort. Methods: Retrospective neurosurgical database search between January 2005 and December 2018, and systematic review of the literature using PRISMA guidelines were performed. Inclusion criteria: Age 60 years or older, radiological diagnosis of intracranial AC, neurosurgical intervention, and neuroradiological (NOG score)/clinical outcome (COG score). Data from both sources were pooled and statistically analyzed. Results: Our literature search yielded 12 studies (34 patients), which were pooled with our institutional data (13 patients). CP shunts (7 patients; 15%), cyst fenestration (28 patients; 60%) and cyst marsupialisation/resection (10 patients; 21%) were the commonest approaches. Average duration of follow-up was 23.6, 26.9, and 9.5 months for each approach, respectively. There was no statistically significant association between choice of surgical intervention and NOG score (P = 0.417), COG score (P = 0.601), or complication rate (P = 0.955). However, CP shunting had the lowest complication rate, with only one patient developing chronic subdural haematoma. Conclusion: CP shunting is a safe and effective surgical treatment strategy for ACs in the elderly. It has similar clinical and radiological outcomes but superior risk profile when compared with other approaches. We advocate CP shunting as first line neurosurgical intervention for the management of intracranial ACs in the elderly. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]