Search

In Arabidopsis thaliana, a number of clock-associated protein factors have been identified. Among them, TOC1 (TIMING OF CAB EXPRESSION 1) is believed to be a component of the central oscillator. TOC1 is a member of a small family of proteins, designated as ARABIDOPSIS PSEUDO-RESPONSE REGULATOR, including PRR1/TOC1, PRR3, PRR5, PRR7 and PRR9. It has not been certain whether or not other PRR family members are also implicated in clock function per se. To clarify this problem, here we constructed a double mutant line, which is assumed to have severe lesions in both the PRR5 and PRR7 genes. Resulting homozygous prr5-11 prr7-11 young seedlings showed a marked phenotype of hyposensitivity to red light during de-etiolation. In addition, they displayed a phenotype of extremely late flowering under long-day photoperiod conditions, but not short-day conditions. The rhythms at the level of transcription of certain clock-controlled genes were severely perturbed in the double mutant plants when they were released into continuous light (LL) and darkness (DD). The observed phenotype was best interpreted as 'arrhythmic in both LL and DD' and/or 'very short period with markedly reduced amplitude'. Even under the light entrainment (LD) conditions, the mutant plants showed anomalous diurnal oscillation profiles with altered amplitude and/or phase with regard to certain clock-controlled genes, including the clock component CCA1 (CIRCADIAN CLOCK-ASSOCIATED 1) gene. Such events were observed even under temperature entrainment conditions, suggesting that the prr5-11 prr7-11 lesions cannot simply be attributed to a defect in the light signal input pathway. These pleiotropic circadian-associated phenotypes of the double mutant were very remarkable, as compared with those observed previously for each single mutant. Taking these results together, we propose for the first time that PRR5 and PRR7 coordinately (or synergistically) play essential clock-associated roles close to the central oscillator.

In general, the clock (or oscillator) is central to circadian rhythms in many organisms. In the model higher plant Arabidopsis thaliana, the best candidates for clock components are CCA1 (CIRCADIAN CLOCK-ASSOCIATED 1) and LHY (LATE ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL), which are homologous Myb-related transcription factors. It is also believed that TOC1 (TIMING OF CAB EXPRESSION 1) is another component of the central oscillator. In this connection, we have been characterizing a small family of proteins, designated ARABIDOPSIS PSEUDO-RESPONSE REGULATOR (PRR1, PRR3, PRR5, PRR7, and PRR9), based on the fact that one of the members (PRR1) is identical to TOC1. Nevertheless, it is not yet certain whether other PRR family members are also implicated in clock function per se. To address this issue, in this study we examined a functional interaction between the CCA1 clock component and one of the PRR family members, PRR5, by employing transgenic lines overexpressing both the CCA1 and PRR5 genes. Evidence will be provided that PRR5 plays an antagonistic role(s) to the putative CCA1 clock component.

In Arabidopsis thaliana, a number of circadian-associated factors have been identified. Among those, TOC1 (TIMING OF CAB EXPRESSION 1) is believed to be a component of the central oscillator. TOC1 is a member of a small family of proteins, designated as Arabidopsis PSEUDO-RESPONSE REGULATORS (APRR1/TOC1, APRR3, APRR5, APRR7, and APRR9). Nonetheless, it is not very clear whether or not the APRR family members other than APRR1/TOC1 are also implicated in the mechanisms underlying the circadian rhythm. To address this issue further, here we characterized a set of T-DNA insertion mutants, each of which is assumed to have a severe lesion in each one of the quintet genes (i.e. APRR5 and APRR7). For each of these mutants (aprr5-11 and aprr7-11) we demonstrate that a given mutation singly, if not directly, affects the circadian-associated biological events simultaneously: (i) flowering time in the long-day photoperiod conditions, (ii) red light sensitivity of seedlings during the early photomorphogenesis, and (iii) the period of free-running rhythms of certain clock-controlled genes including CCA1 and APRR1/TOC1 in constant white light. These results suggest that, although the quintet members other than APRR1/TOC1 may not be directly integrated into the framework of the central oscillator, they are crucial for a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying the Arabidopsis circadian clock.

In Arabidopsis thaliana, the transcripts of the APRR1/TOC1 family genes each start accumulating after dawn rhythmically and one after another at intervals in the order of APRR9-->APRR7-->APRR5-->APRR3-->APRR1/TOC1 under continuous light. Except for the well-characterized APRR1/TOC1, however, no evidence has been provided that other APRR1/TOC1 family genes are indeed implicated in the mechanisms underlying circadian rhythms. We here attempted to provide such evidence by characterizing transgenic plants that constitutively express the APRR5 gene. The resulting APRR5-overexpressing (APRR5-ox) plants showed intriguing properties with regard to not only circadian rhythms, but also control of flowering time and light response. First, the aberrant expression of APRR5 in such transgenic plants resulted in a characteristic phenotype with regard to transcriptional events, in which free-running rhythms were considerably altered for certain circadian-regulated genes, including CCA1, LHY, APRR1/TOC1, other APRR1/TOC1 members, GI and CAB2, although each rhythm was clearly sustained even after plants were transferred to continuous light. With regard to biological events, APRR5-ox plants flowered much earlier than wild-type plants, more or less, in a manner independent of photoperiodicity (or under short-day conditions). Furthermore, APRR5-ox plants showed an SRL (short-hypocotyls under red light) phenotype that is indicative of hypersensitiveness to red light in early photomorphogenesis. Both APRR1-ox and APRR9-ox plants also showed the same phenotype. Therefore, APRR5 (together with APRR1/TOC1 and APRR9) must be taken into consideration for a better understanding of the molecular links between circadian rhythms, control of flowering time through the photoperiodic long-day pathway, and also light signaling-controlled plant development.

The complete genome sequence of Arabidopsis thaliana revealed that this higher plant has a tremendous number of protein kinases. We recently isolated a novel type of protein kinase, named AtWNK1, which shows an in vitro ability to phosphorylate the APRR3 member of the APRR1/TOC1 quintet that has been implicated in a mechanism underlying circadian rhythms in Arabidopsis. We here address two issues, one general and one specific, as to this novel protein kinase. We first asked the general question of how many WNK family members are present in this higher plant, then whether or not other members are also relevant to circadian rhythms. The results of our analyses showed that Arabidopsis has at least 9 members of the WNK1 family of protein kinases (designated here as WNK1 to WNK9), the structural design of which is clearly distinct from those of other known protein kinases, such as receptor-like kinases and mitogen-activated protein kinases. They were examined with special reference to the circadian-related APRR1/TOC1 quintet. It was found that not only the transcription of the WNK1 gene, but also those of three other members (WNK2, WNK4, and WNK6) are under the control of circadian rhythms. These results suggested that certain members of the WNK family of protein kinases might play roles in a mechanism that generates circadian rhythms in Arabidopsis.