Search

Because they were developed for optimal sequential complexity, classical graph algorithms as found in textbooks have strictly-defined orders of operations. Enforcing a prescribed order of operations, or even an approximate order, in a distributed memory setting requires significant amounts of synchronization, which in turn can severely limit scalability. As a result, new algorithms are typically required to achieve scalable performance, even for solving well-known graph problems. Yet, even in these cases, parallel graph algorithms are written according to parallel programming models that evolved for, e.g., scientific computing, and that still have inherent, and scalability-limiting, amounts of synchronization. In this paper we present a new approach to parallel graph algorithms: synchronization-avoiding algorithms. To eliminate synchronization and its associated overhead, synchronization-avoiding algorithms perform work in an unordered and fully asynchronous fashion in such a way that the result is constantly refined toward its final state. "Wasted" work is minimized by locally prioritizing tasks using problem-dependent task utility metrics. We classify algorithms for graph applications into two broad categories: algorithms with monotonic updates (which evince global synchronization) and algorithms with non-monotonic updates (which evince vertex-centric synchronization). We apply our approach to both classes and develop novel, synchronization-avoiding algorithms for solving exemplar problems: SSSP and connected components for the former, graph coloring for the latter. We demonstrate that eliminating synchronization in conjunction with effective scheduling policies and optimizations in the runtime results in improved scalability for both classes of algorithms.

Performance of distributed graph algorithms can benefit greatly by forming rapport between algorithmic abstraction and the underlying runtime system that is responsible for scheduling work and exchanging messages. However, due to their dynamic and irregular nature of computation, distributed graph algorithms written in different programming models impose varying degrees of workload pressure on the runtime. To cope with such vastly different workload characteristics, a runtime has to make several trade-offs. One such trade-off arises, for example, when the runtime scheduler has to choose among alternatives such as whether to execute algorithmic work, or progress the network by probing network buffers, or throttle sending messages (termed flow control). This trade-off decides between optimizing the throughput of a runtime scheduler by increasing the rate of execution of algorithmic work, and reducing the latency of the network messages. Another trade-off exists when a decision has to be made about when to send aggregated messages in buffers (message coalescing). This decision chooses between trading off latency for network bandwidth and vice versa. At any instant, such trade-offs emphasize either on improving the quantity of work being executed (by maximizing the scheduler throughput) or on improving the quality of work (by prioritizing better work). However, encoding static policies for different runtime features (such as flow control, coalescing) can prevent graph algorithms from achieving their full potentials, thus can under-mine the actual performance of a distributed graph algorithm . In this paper, we investigate runtime support for distributed graph algorithms in the context of two paradigms: variants of well-known Bulk-Synchronous Parallel model and asynchronous programming model. We explore generic runtime features such as message coalescing (aggregation) and flow control and show that execution policies of these features need to be adjusted over time to make a positive impact on the execution time of a distributed graph algorithm. Since synchronous and asynchronous graph algorithms have different workload characteristics, not all of such runtime features may be good candidates for adaptation. Each of these algorithmic paradigms may require different set of features to be adapted over time. We demonstrate which set of feature(s) can be useful in each case to achieve the right balance of work in the runtime layer. Existing implementation of different graph algorithms can benefit from adapting dynamic policies in the underlying runtime.

In this paper we explore scheduling and runtime system support for unordered distributed graph computations that rely on optimistic (speculative) execution. Performance of such algorithms is impacted by two competing trends: the higher degree of parallelism enabled by optimistic execution in turn requires substantial runtime support. To address the potentially high overhead and scheduling complexity introduced by the runtime, we investigate customizable scheduling policies that augment the scheduler of the underlying runtime to adapt it to a specific graph application. We present several implementations of Distributed Control (DC), a data-driven unordered approach with work prioritization and demonstrate that customizable scheduling policies result in the most efficient implementation, outperforming the well-known ?-stepping Single-Source Shortest Paths (SSSP) and Jones-Plassmann vertex-coloring algorithms. We apply two scheduling techniques, flow control and adaptive frequency of network progress, which allow application-level control over the balance of domain work and the runtime work. Experimental results show the benefit of such application-aware scheduling for irregular distributed graph algorithms.

Sorting a permutation by transpositions (SPbT) is an important problem in bioinformtics. In this article, we improve the running time of the best known approximation algorithm for SPbT.

We improve the running time from O(n2) to O(nlogn) of the existing best known 1.375−approximation algorithm for sorting by transpositions with the help of the permutation tree data structure.