Search

Background: The diagnosis of acute appendicitis (AA) is mainly dependent on clinical evaluation. There are several scoring systems developed for an accurate and early diagnosis of AA. Modified Alvarado score is one of the most common systems. The Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis (RIPASA) scoring system was developed in 2010. The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the accuracy of modified Alvarado and RIPASA scoring systems for the diagnosis of AA., Methods: A total of 100 cases with the clinical diagnosis of AA were included in the study. All the cases were treated surgically. For all cases, modified Alvarado and RIPASA scores were calculated and recorded. According to the calculated cut-off values, sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values and total accuracy were calculated for each scoring systems., Results: According to the receiver operating characteristic curve. the optimal score of modified Alvarado score for AA was found to be 5.5 with a sensitivity of 88% and specificity of 69%. According to the receiver operating characteristic curve, the optimal score of RIPASA score for AA was found to be 8.75 with a sensitivity of 94% and specificity of 88%. With the cut-off value of 8.75, total accuracy of RIPASA scoring was found to be 85.2%. Although there is no significant difference in negative appendicectomy rate, both sensitivity and the specificity of the RIPASA were found to be significantly higher than the modified Alvarado., Conclusion: According to the current study, RIPASA scoring system was found to be superior to modified Alvarado in the prediction of cases with AA., (© 2019 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.)

Background: Acute appendicitis (AA) is the most common reason for abdominal surgery in the world. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of medical treatment on histological findings in rabbits with AA., Methods: Twenty-one male New Zealand rabbits were divided into 3 groups: appendix ligation and medical treatment, appendix ligation and no treatment, and control group, which underwent only laparotomy., Results: In appendix ligation without treatment group, AA findings were much more severe., Conclusion: Medical treatment reduced inflammation of AA.

Purpose: To clarify the role of medical treatment in the management of acute appendicitis and the value of C-reactive protein (CRP) for predicting its failure., Materials and Methods: Patients with clinically diagnosed acute appendicitis, confirmed by imaging studies, were enrolled in this study. We measured leukocyte counts and CRP levels and recorded success and recurrence rates and the efficiency of medical treatment during follow-up. The efficiency of CRP values to predict failure of medical treatment was evaluated using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis., Results: The subjects comprised 193 patients (mean age 30.9 years) who received medical treatment for acute appendicitis. The mean follow-up period was 12.3 (6-24) months and the early success rate of medical treatment was 86.5 % (160/185). Fifteen (9.3 %) patients suffered recurrence during follow-up. The leukocyte and CRP levels in these two groups of patients were not significantly different at the beginning of the treatment, but the increase in the CRP value differed significantly between the two groups during the follow-up period (p < 0.001). ROC curve analysis suggested that the optimum CRP cut-off point for unsuccessful medical treatment was 80.8 mg/L, with 81.82 % sensitivity and 84.34 % specificity (p < 0.001)., Conclusion: The success rate for treating acute appendicitis medically is high, with antibiotic treatment being effective as the firstline therapy for many unselected patients. An increase in CRP levels to 80.8 mg/L and above seems to be a meaningful parameter for determining a lack of response to medical treatment.

Copyright of Turkish Journal of Trauma & Emergency Surgery / Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi is the property of KARE Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)