Search

SummaryBackground: Stump appendicitis is a rare delayed complication of appendectomy. Several diseases present with right lower abdominal pain, and therefore it is occasionally difficult to make a differential diagnosis, especially in patients with a history of appendectomy. In this paper we present our experiences with acute appendicitis following an appendectomy. Patients and Method: We selected five cases from January 2002 to December 2010. The clinical characteristics, imaging studies, treatment, and outcome were recorded. Results: All patients presented with abdominal pain (4 patients with fever). The mean duration of onset was 2 days. All patients had a history of ruptured appendicitis (2 patients showed a combination with generalized peritonitis). The mean duration since the previous appendectomy was 7.54 years. 4 patients underwent an abdominal ultrasound, and all patients underwent abdominal computed tomography, showing again a ruptured appendicitis. 4 of 5 patients had a stump appendicitis. All of the patients showed a good prognosis following surgery. Conclusions: The stump following an appendectomy should be shortened as much as possible. However, sometimes recurrent appendicitis with perforation will develop in patients with complete resection of the appendix. Stump appendicitis is associated with a history of ruptured appendicitis.

Acute appendicitis is the most common etiology of the acute abdomen, generally requiring urgent surgical intervention. The lifetime incidence of acute appendicitis is approximate 7%. In 1886, Fitz described the natural course of appendicitis. He began advocating early appendectomy to prevent perforation with subsequent complications of sepsis, shock and potential mortality. In 1894 McBurney introduced the right lower quadrant incision to approach the appendix. The open appendectomy (OA) through a McBurney incision came into favour more than a century ago. It is a simple, safe, quick, and effective operation that can be performed by a general surgeon with the basic surgical instruments.

With the advances in laparoscopic instruments and surgical techniques, the use of laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) has been increasing rapidly in recent years. In this retrospective analysis, we aimed to determine the competitive edge of LA versus open appendectomy (OA) in different settings of disease complexity, gender, and age difference.A retrospective analysis of the patients diagnosed with acute appendicitis at Changhua and Chang-Bing Show-Chwan Memorial Hospitals from January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2009 was conducted. Trend and indication of OA and LA were recorded, combined with a comparison of medical costs, complication rates, wound infection rates, and hospital stays in different settings of disease complexity, gender, and age group.A total of 1366 appendicitis patients were enrolled, and the rate of LA use increased rapidly, from 8.1% in 2004 to 90.3% in 2009. The increased use of LA was seen in both the uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis patients and in both gender and age groups (pediatric, adult, and elderly). Compared with OA, LA was associated with a lower complication rate (9.5% versus 5.8%; P = .013), a lower wound infection rate (8.6% versus 4.2%; P = .001), and a shorter hospital stay (4.60 ± 3.64 versus 4.06 ± 1.84 days; P = .001), but a higher mean cost (32,670 ± 28,568 versus 37,567 ± 12,064 New Taiwan dollars). In the subgroup analysis, the patients with complicated appendicitis, female patients, and pediatric and elderly patients benefited from a reduced hospital stay. LA is about 15% more expensive than OA.LA is as safe and effective as OA in many settings of appendicitis and may be selectively advantageous in patients with complicated appendicitis and in elderly subgroups.

Acute appendicitis is the most common acute abdomen in general surgery. Show-Chwan Memorial Hospital began an AITS/IRCAD laparoscopic training program in late May 2008. In this retrospective analysis, we surveyed the impact of the AITS training program on surgeons’ preference for open appendectomy (OA) versus laparoscopic appendectomy (LA). From January 1, 2004 to July 31, 2009, patients diagnosed with acute appendicitis in Changhua Show-Chwan Memorial Hospital and Chang-Bing Show-Chwan Memorial Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic data, laboratory examinations, surgical methods, hospital stay, and complication rate data were collected and analyzed. The LA rate and effect of surgeons’ preference before and after AITS were compared. In all, 1,267 patients (58.2% male and 41.8% female; mean age, 36.6 years) were diagnosed with acute appendicitis during this period. Among them, 78.9% of patients had uncomplicated and 21.1% complicated appendicitis; 784 patients (61.9%) underwent OA, and 465 (36.7%) received LA. In 2004, only 8.1% of patients underwent LA, but the number increased rapidly to 90.4% in 2009 (P

Background: Acute appendicitis is much more serious in the elderly, and early diagnosis is very important. However, the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in older patients is often difficult because these patients may present with atypical clinical manifestations. Methods: We conducted a prospective study to evaluate and compare the value of technetium 99m hexamethylpropyleneamine oxide (Tc 99m HMPAO) labeled white blood cell (WBC) abdominal scan and abdominal sonography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in older patients with an atypical clinical presentation. Forty-nine patients (age > 50 years) with acute abdominal pain and suspected appendicitis, but with atypical findings, were included in this study. Results: Twenty-seven patients received laparotomy for final surgical and pathologic diagnoses. The remaining 22 patients did not receive surgery and showed no evidence of appendicitis after at least 1 month of follow-up. Two patients had false-positive WBC scan findings and two patients had false-negative WBC scan findings. The overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for WBC scans in diagnosing appendicitis were 92.0%, 91.7%, and 91.8%, respectively. The overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for abdominal sonography in diagnosing appendicitis were 84.0%, 95.8%, and 89.8%, respectively. Conclusion: The Tc 99m HMPAO WBC scan provides a more sensitive and accurate method for diagnosing appendicitis in older patients with equivocal clinical examinations when compared with abdominal sonography.