Search

It remains to be elucidated whether Ca 2+ antagonists induce pharmacological preconditioning to protect the heart against ischemia/reperfusion injury. The aim of this study was to determine whether and how pretreatment with a Ca 2+ antagonist, azelnidipine, could protect cardiomyocytes against hypoxia/reoxygenation (H/R) injury in vitro. Using HL-1 cardiomyocytes, we studied effects of azelnidipine on NO synthase (NOS) expression, NO production, cell death and apoptosis during H/R. Action potential durations (APDs) were determined by the whole-cell patch-clamp technique. Azelnidipine enhanced endothelial NOS phosphorylation and NO production in HL-1 cells under normoxia, which was abolished by a heat shock protein 90 inhibitor, geldanamycin, and an antioxidant, N-acetylcysteine. Pretreatment with azelnidipine reduced cell death and shortened APDs during H/R. These effects of azelnidipine were diminished by a NOS inhibitor, L-NAME, but were influenced by neither a T-type Ca 2+ channel inhibitor, NiCl 2 , nor a N-type Ca 2+ channel inhibitor, ω-conotoxin. The azelnidipine-induced reduction in cell death was not significantly enhanced by either additional azelnidipine treatment during H/R or increasing extracellular Ca 2+ concentrations. RNA sequence (RNA-seq) data indicated that azelnidipine-induced attenuation of cell death, which depended on enhanced NO production, did not involve any significant modifications of gene expression responsible for the NO/cGMP/PKG pathway. We conclude that pretreatment with azelnidipine protects HL-1 cardiomyocytes against H/R injury via NO-dependent APD shortening and L-type Ca 2+ channel blockade independently of effects on gene expression., (© 2024. Springer Nature Japan KK, part of Springer Nature.)

Case reports from as early as the 1970s have shown that intravenous injection of even a small dose of volatile anesthetics result in fatal lung injury. Direct contact between volatile anesthetics and pulmonary vasculature triggers chemical damage in the vessel walls. A wide variety of factors are involved in lung ischemia-reperfusion injury (LIRI), such as pulmonary endothelial cells, alveolar epithelial cells, alveolar macrophages, neutrophils, mast cells, platelets, proinflammatory cytokines, and surfactant. With a constellation of factors involved, the assessment of the protective effect of volatile anesthetics in LIRI is difficult. Multiple animal studies have reported that with regards to LIRI, sevoflurane demonstrates an anti-inflammatory effect in immunocompetent cells and an anti-apoptotic effect on lung tissue. Scattered studies have dismissed a protective effect of desflurane against LIRI. While a single-center randomized controlled trial (RCT) found that volatile anesthetics including desflurane demonstrated a lung-protective effect in thoracic surgery, a multicenter RCT did not demonstrate a lung-protective effect of desflurane. LIRI is common in lung transplantation. One study, although limited due to its small sample size, found that the use of volatile anesthetics in organ procurement surgery involving "death by neurologic criteria" donors did not improve lung graft survival. Future studies on the protective effect of volatile anesthetics against LIRI must examine not only the mechanism of the protective effect but also differences in the effects of different types of volatile anesthetics, their optimal dosage, and the appropriateness of their use in the event of marked alveolar capillary barrier damage. • Intravenous injection of volatile anesthetics results in fatal pulmonary edema. • Lung ischemia-reperfusion injury involves many factors like immunocompetent cells. • Volatile anesthetics have a lung protective effect through anti-inflammatory action. • Desflurane did not demonstrate a lung-protective effect in some of the studies. • Studies should examine optimal dose of volatile anesthetics in lung injury. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]