1. The Mosaic bioprosthesis in the aortic position: seven years' results.
- Author
-
Gansera B, Botzenhardt F, Günzinger R, Spiliopoulos K, Angelis I, and Kemkes BM
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aortic Valve Insufficiency diagnostic imaging, Aortic Valve Insufficiency mortality, Aortic Valve Stenosis diagnostic imaging, Aortic Valve Stenosis mortality, Cohort Studies, Echocardiography, Doppler, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation adverse effects, Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation methods, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Postoperative Complications, Prosthesis Design, Retrospective Studies, Severity of Illness Index, Survival Rate, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, Aortic Valve Insufficiency surgery, Aortic Valve Stenosis surgery, Bioprosthesis, Heart Valve Prosthesis, Prosthesis Failure
- Abstract
Background and Aim of the Study: The Mosaic bioprosthesis is a stented porcine aortic valve, which combines glutaraldehyde fixation with zero-pressure and root-pressure techniques and anti-mineralization treatment with amino-oleic acid for improved hemodynamics and tissue durability. The study aim was to collect intermediate-term data of the Mosaic bioprosthesis in the aortic position, the first device having been implanted in February 1994 at the authors' institution., Methods: A total of 100 patients (49 females, 51 males) underwent aortic valve replacement with the Mosaic bioprosthesis between February 1994 and May 1999. Mean age at implant was 73.4 +/- 7.3 years. Concomitant procedures were performed in 40.0% of cases. Patients were followed up within 30 days postoperatively, after six months, and at annual intervals thereafter. Mean follow up was 3.8 years (range: 0.1-7.1 years); total follow up was 383.1 patient-years (pt-yr) and 100% complete., Results: Early mortality (< or = 30 days) was 3.0%; late mortality was 4.6%/pt-yr, including a valve-related mortality of 0.6%/pt-yr. Freedom from event at seven years was 96.8 +/- 1.8% for thromboembolic events, 97.2 +/- 2.0% for thrombosed bioprosthesis, 96.6 +/- 2.6% for structural valve deterioration, 98.2 +/- 1.8% for nonstructural dysfunction, 95.9 +/- 2.0% for anti-thromboembolic hemorrhage, 98.9 +/- 1.1% for endocarditis, and 93.9 +/- 3.2% for reoperation/explant. After one year, the mean systolic pressure gradient was 15.3 +/- 6.7, 14.5 +/- 5.7, 12.7 +/- 4.1 and 12.9 +/- 4.8 mmHg for 21, 23, 25 and 27 mm valves respectively; the effective orifice area (EOA) was 1.4 +/- 0.4, 1.7 +/- 0.4, 1.8 +/- 0.4 and 2.6 +/- 0.4 cm2 for 21, 23, 25 and 27 mm valves respectively; and the EOA index was 0.8 +/- 0.3, 0.9 +/- 0.2, 0.9 +/- 0.2 and 1.3 +/- 0.1 cm2/m2 respectively. The mean left ventricular mass index was decreased significantly, from 159.7 +/- 56.8 g/m2 to 137.3 +/- 40.8 g/m2, for all valve sizes after one year., Conclusion: Clinical and hemodynamic performance of the Mosaic bioprosthesis was highly satisfactory during the first seven years after clinical introduction.
- Published
- 2003