1. Safety and performance of a novel embolic deflection device in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: results from the DEFLECT I study.
- Author
-
Baumbach A, Mullen M, Brickman AM, Aggarwal SK, Pietras CG, Forrest JK, Hildick-Smith D, Meller SM, Gambone L, den Heijer P, Margolis P, Voros S, and Lansky AJ
- Subjects
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alloys, Aortic Valve Stenosis diagnosis, Aortic Valve Stenosis mortality, Aortic Valve Stenosis physiopathology, Brain Ischemia etiology, Brain Ischemia prevention & control, Brazil, Cardiac Catheterization adverse effects, Cardiac Catheterization methods, Cardiac Catheterization mortality, Cognition, Cognition Disorders etiology, Cognition Disorders prevention & control, Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Europe, Female, Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation adverse effects, Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation methods, Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation mortality, Humans, Intracranial Embolism diagnosis, Intracranial Embolism etiology, Intracranial Embolism mortality, Male, Predictive Value of Tests, Prospective Studies, Prosthesis Design, Risk Factors, Severity of Illness Index, Stroke etiology, Stroke prevention & control, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, Ultrasonography, Doppler, Transcranial, Aortic Valve physiopathology, Aortic Valve Stenosis therapy, Cardiac Catheterization instrumentation, Embolic Protection Devices, Heart Valve Prosthesis, Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation instrumentation, Intracranial Embolism prevention & control
- Abstract
Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the safety and performance of the TriGuard™ Embolic Deflection Device (EDD), a nitinol mesh filter positioned in the aortic arch across all three major cerebral artery take-offs to deflect emboli away from the cerebral circulation, in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR)., Methods and Results: The prospective, multicentre DEFLECT I study (NCT01448421) enrolled 37 consecutive subjects undergoing TAVR with the TriGuard EDD. Subjects underwent clinical and cognitive follow-up to 30 days; cerebral diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) was performed pre-procedure and at 4±2 days post procedure. The device performed as intended with successful cerebral coverage in 80% (28/35) of cases. The primary safety endpoint (in-hospital EDD device- or EDD procedure-related cardiovascular mortality, major stroke disability, life-threatening bleeding, distal embolisation, major vascular complications, or need for acute cardiac surgery) occurred in 8.1% of subjects (VARC-defined two life-threatening bleeds and one vascular complication). The presence of new cerebral ischaemic lesions on post-procedure DW-MRI (n=28) was similar to historical controls (82% vs. 76%, p=NS). However, an exploratory analysis found that per-patient total lesion volume was 34% lower than reported historical data (0.2 vs. 0.3 cm3), and 89% lower in patients with complete (n=17) versus incomplete (n=10) cerebral vessel coverage (0.05 vs. 0.45 cm3, p=0.016)., Conclusions: Use of the first-generation TriGuard EDD during TAVR is safe, and device performance was successful in 80% of cases during the highest embolic-risk portions of the TAVR procedure. The potential of the TriGuard EDD to reduce total cerebral ischaemic burden merits further randomised investigation.
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF