Search

Background: TAVI is a widely accepted treatment for patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). Despite the adoption of diverse therapies, opportunities remain to develop technologies tailored to provide optimal acute and potential long-term benefits, particularly around haemodynamics, flow and durability., Aims: We aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of the DurAVR transcatheter heart valve (THV), a first-in-class biomimetic valve, in the treatment of patients with symptomatic severe AS., Methods: This was a first-in-human (FIH), prospective, non-randomised, single-arm, single-centre study. Patients with severe, symptomatic AS of any surgical risk and who were eligible for the DurAVR THV prosthesis were recruited; they were assessed at baseline, 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year post-procedure for implant success, haemodynamic performance, and safety., Results: Thirteen patients (73.9±6.4 years old, 77% female) were enrolled. The DurAVR THV was successfully implanted in 100% of cases with no device-related complications. One access site complication, one permanent pacemaker implantation, and one case of moderate aortic regurgitation occurred. Otherwise, no deaths, stroke, bleeding, reinterventions, or myocardial infarction were reported during any of the follow-up visits. Despite a mean annulus size of 22.95±1.09 mm, favourable haemodynamic results were observed at 30 days (effective orifice area [EOA] 2.00±0.17 cm 2 , and mean pressure gradient [MPG] 9.02±2.68 mmHg) and were sustained at 1 year (EOA 1.96±0.11 cm 2 , MPG 8.82±1.38 mmHg), resulting in zero patients with any degree of prosthesis-patient mismatch. Additionally, new valve performance measures derived from cardiovascular magnetic resonance displayed restoration of laminar flow, consistent with a predisease state, in conjunction with a mean coaptation length of 8.3±1.7 mm., Conclusions: Preliminary results from the FIH study with DurAVR THV demonstrate a good safety profile with promising haemodynamic performance sustained at 1 year and restoration of near-normal flow dynamics. Further clinical investigation is warranted to evaluate how DurAVR THV may play a role in addressing the challenge of lifetime management in AS patients.

Background: Cardiac tamponade caused by temporary right ventricular (RV) pacemaker perforation is a rare but serious complication in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR)., Aims: To study the incidence of temporary pacemaker related cardiac tamponade in TAVR, and the relation to the type of pacemaker lead used in periprocedural temporary transvenous pacing., Methods: A single center registry of transfemoral TAVRs in 2014-2020. Main inclusion criterion was peri-operative use of a temporary RV pacing lead. Main exclusion criteria were a preoperatively implanted permanent pacemaker or the exclusive use of left ventricular guidewire pacing. Incident cardiac tamponade was classified as pacemaker lead related, or other. Patients were grouped according to type of temporary RV pacing wire., Results: 810 patients were included (age 80.5 ± 7.3 [mean ± standard deviation], female 319, 39.4%). Of these, 566 (69.9%) received a standard RV temporary pacing wire (RV-TPW), and 244 (30.1%) received temporary RV pacing through a permanent, passive pacemaker lead (RV-TPPL). In total, 18 (2.2%) events of cardiac tamponade occurred, 12 (67%) were pacemaker lead related. All pacemaker lead-related cardiac tamponades occurred in the group who received a standard RV-TPW and none in the group who received RV-TPPL (n = 12 [2.1%] vs. n = 0 [0%], p = 0.022). No difference in cardiac tamponade due to other causes was seen between the groups (p = 0.82)., Conclusions: The use of soft-tip RV-TPPL was associated with a lower risk of pacemaker related cardiac tamponade in TAVR. When perioperative pacing is indicated, temporary RV-TPPL may contribute to a significant reduction of cardiac tamponade in TAVR., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Dr. Feldt has received consulting/speaker fees from Abbott Vascular, Astra Zeneca, Anteris Technologies and Alleviant Medical. Dr. Dalén, Dr. Kastengren, Dr. Hörnsten, and Dr. Omar report no relationships that could be construed as a conflict of interest. Dr. Rück has served as a proctor for Boston Scientific and has received consulting fees from Medtronic and Edwards. Dr. Meduri has received consulting fees from Boston Scientific, Abbott Vascular, Cardiovalve, Vdyne, Alleviant and Anteris Technologies. Dr. Saleh and Dr. Linder report no relationships that could be construed as a conflict of interest. Dr. Settergren has served as a proctor for Boston Scientific, Abbott Vascular and has received consulting fees from Medtronic, Anteris Technologies, Holistic Medical, Cardiomech and Teleflex., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: We aimed to develop and validate an effective prediction model for 1-year mortality risk in elective transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), ie, the TAVR-Risk (TARI) model., Background: TAVR is the primary treatment for patients with symptomatic severe aortic valve stenosis; however, risk assessment tools for longer-term outcomes after TAVR remain scarce., Methods: This retrospective cohort study used logistic regression to test univariate and multivariate associations. The German Aortic Valve Registry (GARY) was the derivation (n = 20,704) and the Swedish SWEDEHEART TAVR Registry (SWENTRY) was the validation cohort (n = 3982). The main outcome was the area under the curve (AUC) in the prediction of 1-year mortality. The final model included 12 parameters that were associated with 1-year mortality in a multivariate analysis., Results: The TARI model (AUC, 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.65-0.67) performed better as compared with the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score (AUC, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.62-0.64; P<.001) and logistic EuroSCORE I (AUC, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.59-0.61; P<.001) in the GARY derivation cohort, and discriminated the risk for 1-year mortality better than logistic EuroSCORE I in the SWENTRY validation cohort (AUC, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.60-0.64 vs AUC, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.57-0.61; P=.04)., Conclusions: This novel TARI score provides a relatively easy-to-use risk model and offers a superior prediction for 1-year mortality in European TAVR patients.

Background: Arterial access-site related complications constitute a large proportion of adverse events related to cardiac interventions requiring large-bore devices and have significant implications on morbidity, mortality and hospital cost., Aims: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a novel percutaneous plug-based vascular closure device (VCD) in 1000 consecutive patients undergoing transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)., Methods: A single-center observational study evaluating a plug-based VCD (MANTA, Teleflex/Essential Medical Inc., Malvern, Pennsylvania, USA) in patients undergoing TAVI at the Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. The primary outcome was VCD-related major vascular complication according to the criteria of the Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-2., Results: From May 2017 to September 2020 a total of 1000 consecutive patients underwent transfemoral TAVI with arterial access-site management using the MANTA VCD. VARC-2 major vascular complications occurred in 42 (4.2%) patients: 17 (1.7%) patients intraoperatively received a covered stent, 17 (1.7%) patients underwent surgical repair during hospital stay, 3 (0.3%) patients underwent vascular surgery after discharge, 3 (0.3%) patients had major bleeding and 2 (0.2%) patients had symptoms of claudication with conservative treatment. No significant differences in major complications were seen between individual interventionists irrespective of experience with the device. A larger sheath outer diameter to femoral artery inner diameter ratio was the only factor associated with a significant increase of VCD-related major vascular complications., Conclusion: This largest ever real-world evaluation of MANTA for large-bore arteriotomy closure in transfemoral TAVI patients indicates effective and safe arterial access-site management with low complication rates and short learning curve., Clinical Trial Registration: http://www., Clinicaltrials: gov. Unique identifier: NCT04392492., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: The impact of a change in mitral regurgitation (MR) following TAVR is unknown. We studied the impact of baseline MR and early post-procedural change in MR on survival following TAVR., Methods: The SWEDEHEART registry included all TAVRs performed in Sweden. Patients were dichotomized into no/mild and moderate/severe MR groups. Vital status, echocardiographic data at baseline and within 7 days after TAVR were analyzed., Results: 1712 patients were included. 1404 (82%) had no/mild MR and 308 (18%) had moderate/severe MR. Baseline moderate/severe MR conferred a higher mortality rate at 5-year follow-up (adjusted HR 1.29, CI 1.01-1.65, p = 0.04). Using persistent ≤mild MR as the reference, when moderate/severe MR persisted or if MR worsened from ≤mild at baseline to moderate/severe after TAVR, higher 5-year mortality rates were seen (adjusted HR 1.66, CI 1.17-2.34, p = 0.04; adjusted HR 1.97, CI 1.29-3.00, p = 0.002, respectively). If baseline moderate/severe MR improved to ≤mild after TAVR no excess mortality was seen (HR 1.09, CI 0.75-1.58, p = 0.67). Paravalvular aortic regurgitation (PVL) was inversely associated with MR improvement after TAVR (OR 0.4, 95%: CI 0.17-0.94; p = 0.034). Atrial fibrillation (OR 2.1, 95% CI: 1.27-3.39, p = 0.004), self-expanding valve (OR 3.8, 95% CI: 2.08-7.14, p < 0.0001), and PVL (4.3, 95% CI 2.32-7.78. p < 0.0001) were associated with MR worsening., Conclusions: Moderate/severe baseline MR in patients undergoing TAVR is associated with a mortality increase during 5 years of follow-up. This risk is offset if MR improves to ≤mild, whereas worsening of MR after TAVR is associated with a 2-fold mortality increase., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Increased mortality has been observed in those with cardiovascular diseases who are of normal body mass index (BMI) compared to the overweight and the obese. A similar association has been demonstrated in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve (TAVI) implantation. However, it still remains unclear whether low or normal BMI itself is unfavourable or whether this is merely a reflection of cardiac cachexia due to severe aortic stenosis. The hypothesis for the study was that weight change prior to TAVI may be associated with increased mortality following the procedure., Subjects, Materials and Methods: Single centre retrospective analysis using the SWEDEHEART registry, national mortality statistics and local hospital database. Body mass index was used as the anthropomorphic measurement and patients grouped by WHO categories and weight change trajectory before and at TAVI. Kaplan-Meier survival was constructed and a Cox proportional hazard model used to evaluate predictors of outcome., Results: Consecutive data on 493 patients with three year follow-up between 2008-2015 were evaluated. Overweight and obese body mass index categories (BMI>25) were associated with improved mortality compared to normal and underweight patients (BMI<25) (log rank p=0.02), hazard ratio of 0.68 (0.50-0.93). Weight loss trajectory was associated with increased mortality compared to stable weight (log rank p=0.01), hazard ratio 1.64 p=0.025., Conclusion: The pre-procedural weight trajectory of patients undergoing TAVI is an important predictor of clinical outcome after TAVI. Patients with stable weight trajectories are associated with improved mortality outcome compared to those with decreasing weight., (Copyright © 2017 Asia Oceania Association for the Study of Obesity. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Collateral pathways in vascular disease are important natural "bypass" conduits that protect against ischemia. Endovascular diagnostic and therapeutic procedures via peripheral access sites are performed frequently. This case report underlines the importance of being aware of collateral circulation in patients with chronic aortoiliac occlusive disease undergoing subclavian transcatheter aortic valve implantation to avoid acute limb ischemia. (©) RSNA, 2016.