Search

Robotic assisted aortic valve surgery is still challenging and debatable. We retrospectively reviewed our cases of robotic assisted aortic valve replacement utilizing sutureless aortic valve with following surgical technique: 3 ports, 1 for endoscope and 2 for the robotic arms were inserted in the right chest and da Vinci Si robotic system (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) was adapted to these ports. Cardiopulmonary bypass was initiated through peripheral cannulations. A vent cannula was placed through the right superior pulmonary vein and a cardioplegia cannula in the ascending aorta. After cardioplegic arrest following aortic cross-clamp, the aortic valve was exposed through a clam shell aortotomy. Valvectomy along with decalcification was performed. Next using 3 guiding sutures the Perceval S valve (LivaNova, London, UK) was parachuted down and deployed. After confirming valve position, the aortotomy was closed. There were no major complications during the procedures and no conversion to sternotomy. Exposure of aortic valve was of high quality. Valvectomy required assistance with long scissors by the bedside surgeon for excision of the severely calcified valve cusps and effective decalcification of annulus. Postoperative convalescence was uncomplicated except for postoperative atrial fibrillation in 1 patient. Robotic assistance in aortic valve procedure enabled excellent exposure of the aortic valve and improved manipulation and suturing of the aortic annulus and aorta. There needs to be improvement of instrumentation for valve debridement and removal of calcium from the annulus. In addition, the sutureless valve technology contributes to the feasibility and the efficacy of this procedure.

Interest is growing in the clinical use of sutureless (SU) valves. However, indications in some anatomical sub-settings, like bicuspid aortic valves (BAV), have been so far limited. We discuss herein our initial experience with the implantation of the 3f Enable SU bioprosthesis in patients with a BAV. Patients with a BAV were selected in our unit between March 2011 and September 2014 for a SU 3f Enable valve implantation. Twenty of the 198 patients who underwent a 3f Enable valve implantation in our unit had a BAV. Procedural success was 100 %, but reclamping was necessary in one (5 %) case. Median size of implanted bioprosthesis was 23 mm. After a mean follow-up of 13.8 ± 10.7 months, survival was 100 %. Two patients (10 %) showed an immediate grade 1 paravalvular leak (PVL) that progressed to grade 2 and 3+ (moderate/severe), respectively, during follow-up. Type of bicuspidy (Sievers classification) in these two patients was 0 and intraoperatively aortic annuli admitted the 25 mm calibrator. Among the 18 patients without PVL, no one had a type 0 large BAV. At 1 year, implantation of the 3f Enable SU bioprosthesis appears to be safe in patients with BAV type I and II, while in type 0 use of the SU valve seems to be safe only if the annular diameter is <25 mm. Larger studies are necessary to confirm our findings in order to clarify the indications for SU technology in the subset of bicuspid patients.

Objective: In this paper, we present an endoscopic expandable sizer conceived to allow thoracoscopic aortic valve replacement with a sutureless prosthesis using a dynamic sizing of the aortic annulus., Methods: Ten aortic torsos were prepared using a five-trocar thoracoscopic setting. Once the aortotomy was performed and the aortic valve leaflets removed, the technical feasibility of the endoscopic sizing (introduction into the trocar, expansion into the aortic annulus, determination of the valve size, and retraction) with the device was assessed. In case of successful thoracoscopic sizing, endoscopic implantation of a sutureless valve (five LivaNova Perceval prosthesis and five Medtronic 3f Enable bioprosthesis) was performed. Before ascending aorta closure, we assessed the appropriate sealing of the bioprosthesis in the native annulus with camera visualization and a nerve hook inspection., Results: All the 10 endoscopic sizings were technically feasible. The scheduled aortic sutureless valve implantations were successfully performed. In all cases, fitting and placement of the sutureless bioprosthesis in the flaccid heart was satisfactory, with no paraprosthetic leakage detectable by the nerve hook., Conclusions: The use of the endoscopic expandable sizer is technically possible. In this early-stage test in the flaccid heart, selection of the valve size was satisfactory during thoracoscopic sutureless aortic bioprosthesis implantation. Further laboratory evaluation with fluid dynamics (aortic root pressurization) will be performed before a clinical study is started.

Background: Sutureless valves have recently enabled closed chest aortic valve replacement. This paper evaluates the feasibility of a robotic telemanipulation during thoracoscopic sutureless aortic valve implantation in cadavers., Methods: Cadavers were prepared with a five thoracosopic trocar setting, with a transthoracic clamp inserted in the first right intercostal space and the optics inserted in the second. Seven sutureless valve implantations were scheduled using 5 Sorin Perceval and 2 Medtronic 3f Enable valves., Results: In all cases performance of pericardial suspension, aortotomy and root exposure required less than 20 min. Native valve excision and sutureless bioprosthesis implantation was technically feasible in all cases. A satisfactory prosthesis sealing was ascertained visually and the absence of paravalvular leakages was assessed with a nerve hook test around the prosthetic flange., Conclusions: Closed chest and robot assisted sutureless valve implantation is feasible in cadavers. Robotic technology can enhance reproducibility of the technique. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., (Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

Background: In this article we present a consecutive single-center experience of implantation of the Medtronic 3f Enable aortic valve (Medtronic Inc, Minneapolis, MN)., Methods: Between March 2011 and October 2014, 200 consecutive patients (mean age, 76.4 ± 5.9 years; logistic EuroScore, 7.8% ± 7.0%) in our unit received the 3f Enable valve. This is a retrospective analysis of this prospective monocentric cohort., Results: The 3f Enable valve could be implanted in all the scheduled 141 isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR) procedures (14 full sternotomies, 73 ministernotomies, 44 minithoracotomies, and 10 thoracoscopic approaches) and 59 combined procedures (all using full sternotomy). Reclamping was necessary in 7 (3.5%) patients (paravalvular leakage [PVL] was ≥ grade 1 because of undersizing or prosthetic misalignment); mean cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) times were 65 ± 31 and 91 ± 39 minutes, respectively. Sixteen (8%) patients required early implantation of a pacemaker (PM). At a mean follow-up of 12.6 ± 8.1 months, mean transvalvular gradient and effective orifice area (EOA) were 9.8 ± 4.4 mm Hg and 1.87 ± 0.6 cm(2), respectively. Mild PVL was present in 7 (3.5%) patients and moderate PVL was present in 5 (2.5%) patients. No device migration was registered, and no moderate PVL was detected in the last 100 patients of the cohort. Overall, 3-year survival was 78%., Conclusions: The 3f Enable valve shows excellent results regarding PVL but in our experience required a learning curve and a refinement of the technique of implantation. Use of the prosthesis was possible in various less invasive approaches., (Copyright © 2016 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aim: We present our experience in the use of the sutureless valve in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement for pure aortic regurgitation., Methods: Out of 167 patients who underwent sutureless aortic valve implantation with a Medtronic 3f Enable prosthesis in our unit between March 2011 and February 2014, 12 (7.1%) received a sutureless valve for pure aortic regurgitation., Results: Mean age, logistic EuroSCORE, and left ventricular ejection fraction were 72 ± 5 years, 6.3 ± 2.9%, and 52.5 ± 15.3%, respectively. The sutureless valve could be successfully implanted in all cases; nine patients had a full sternotomy (associated coronary artery bypass graft in four cases and associated mitral surgery in five), one patient had a ministernotomy, and two had a thoracoscopic approach. Average cross-clamping and cardiopulmonary bypass times were 90 ± 30 and 127 ± 51 minutes, respectively. At the outpatient echocardiography, average mean gradient was 10.54 ± 4.99 mmHg and a grade I-II paravalvular leakage (PVL) was detected in the first patient of the cohort (ministernotomy approach). At a mean follow-up of 11.1 ± 5.5 months, average mean gradient was 9.75 ± 2.87 mmHg, no new PVL was detected, and the known PVL was stable. No pacemaker implantation was required., Conclusions: Implantation of the 3f Enable sutureless valve is technically possible with pure aortic regurgitation in selected patients. Multicenter investigations are necessary to assess the mid-term benefits of such a device in this subset of patients., (© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Aim: We describe a series of 3f Enable sutureless prostheses implanted in bicuspid valves., Methods: Between March 2011 and April 2014, five patients with Sievers type 0 bicuspid valves were selected to receive the sutureless 3f Enable prosthesis . Exclusion criteria were: intraoperative calibration of the aortic annulus >27 mm, left ventricle ejection fraction <50%, age <70 years., Results: All the implantations could be performed without the necessity to re-deploy the prosthesis . The perioperative transesophageal echocardiogragram detected two moderate paravalvular leakages (PVL) in two patients who received a large size of prosthesis (25 and 27 mm, respectively). The two leakages, at a follow-up of 32 and 24 months, respectively, increased to grade II and II +. No PVL appeared in the other three patients., Conclusion: This experience should warn about the inadequate performance of the 3f Enable valve in Sievers type 0 large aortic bicuspid annuli. In this subset any minor intraoperative residual leakage should not be accepted., (© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Objective: Interest in aortic sutureless bioprostheses is growing. Here, we evaluate the feasibility of performing aortic sutureless valve replacement concomitant with mitral valve surgery using the 3f Enable prosthesis., Methods: Of the 198 3f Enable® valve implantation procedures carried out in our unit between March 2011 and October 2014, 15 were performed concomitant with mitral valve surgery (8 bioprosthetic replacements and 7 annuloplasties)., Results: The mean age and logistic EuroSCORE were 76 ± 6 years and 10.2 ± 4.8, respectively. The procedural success rate of aortic sutureless valve implantation was 100%. Mean cross-clamping and cardiopulmonary bypass times were 113.9 ± 35 and 150- ± 43 min, respectively. No reclamping in response to a sutureless paravalvular leakage (PVL) was needed. One grade 1 leak was observed at the time of discharge. There was no perioperative mortality. Pacemaker implantation was required in 1 case (6.6%). Initial follow-up (median = 8 months, range 1-6) showed no new aortic PVL; mean and peak transprosthetic gradients and the orifice area were 11.1 ± 2.5 and 18.4 ± 4.9 mmHg and 1.7 ± 0.4 cm(2), respectively. One grade 2 and two grade 1 mitral valve leaks were detected following annuloplasty., Conclusions: 3f Enable® sutureless valve implantation combined with mitral valve surgery appears feasible and the results presented here are encouraging. This procedure has the potential to simplify surgery in a cohort of high-risk patients for whom transcatheter aortic valve replacement is not an effective option. Larger studies should be conducted to confirm these observations., (© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Background: A sutureless aortic valve can be inserted through a right anterior minithoracotomy (RAMT) with consistent decreased cross-clamping time and ease of insertion. We report the experience of RAMT implantation of the 3f Enable (Medtronic, Inc, Minneapolis, Minn) self-expanding sutureless bioprosthesis, performed in 2 European cardiac surgery centers., Method: From September 2012 to April 2014, a total of 71 patients with severe aortic stenosis were selected to receive an aortic valve replacement via RAMT using the sutureless valve. Hemodynamic parameters and clinical outcome were assessed at discharge and up to 16 months postoperatively., Results: All the patients received the prosthesis with success. One conversion to median sternotomy was necessary, owing to severe pleural adhesions. Overall in-hospital mortality was 2.8%. Mean cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamping time were, respectively, 91 ± 29 minutes and 66 ± 19 minutes. Reclamping was necessary in 4 cases (5.6%). Early incidences of grade I or lower paravalvular leakages and pacemaker implantation were, respectively, 4.2% and 5.6%. No paravalvular leakage greater than grade I was registered. The mean follow-up time was 8.1 months; the mean transvalvular gradient was, at discharge and at 6-12 months, respectively, 10.7 ± 4.3 mm Hg and 9.6 ± 3.1 mm Hg. The degree of regurgitation remained stable in all cases. Freedom from all-cause and valve-related mortality was 97% and 99%, respectively, at 1 year., Conclusions: Aortic valve replacement via RAMT with the 3f Enable valve is a reproducible procedure, as it provides satisfactory hemodynamics, and a low valve-related complication rate. Greater experience is needed to compare the performance of the 3f Enable valve with that of other sutureless valves implanted via the same RAMT procedure., (Copyright © 2015 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aim of the Study: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a promising option to treat degenerated aortic valve bioprostheses, and may involve Valve-in-Valve (ViV) procedures. Unfortunately, the ViV technique may provide an inadequate relief of stenosis in small-diameter degenerated bioprostheses, especially in the 19 mm valve subgroup. The study aim was to determine the feasibility and reliability of reoperating 19 mm degenerated bioprostheses, using a minimally invasive sutureless valve implantation., Methods: Between March and December 2012, three reoperative procedures for degenerated 19 mm conventional aortic bioprostheses were performed at the authors' unit. Stenosis was the main modality of structural deterioration. A partial upper ministernotomy approach was used, whereby part of the sewing ring of the previous bioprosthesis was left in place and a 19 mm Medtronic Enable sutureless valve was implanted in all cases., Results: The average valve implantation time was 10.3 min. There were no cases of operative mortality or major morbidity. One permanent pacemaker was required. At discharge, transthoracic echocardiography showed no paravalvular leakages; the average transvalvular gradient was 16 mmHg. The one-year follow up showed no paravalvular leakages and unchanged gradients., Conclusion: The use of a surgical sutureless valve after explanting a 19 mm degenerated bioprosthesis is feasible and effective for relieving stenosis However, larger series are needed to confirm these preliminary results.

Background and Aim of the Study: Interest in sutureless aortic bioprostheses is growing because of the potential advantages that such devices can bring in facilitating minimally invasive approaches. Video assistance can potentially enhance details of decalcification and sutureless valve sizing. We review the feasibility of sutureless aortic valve replacement (AVR) via a minimally invasive video-assisted (MIVA) right anterior minithoracotomy., Methods: Between November 2012 and November 2013, 21 patients were selected to undergo an AVR using the Enable sutureless device (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) via a video-assisted right second space minithoracotomy., Results: Procedural success of the MIVA approach was 95.3% (one conversion to median sternotomy due to severe pleural adhesions). Average aortic clamp time was 72.1 ± 22.1 min. No paravalvular leakage was detected at discharge. Thirty-day mortality was 4.7% (one patient, pulmonary embolism)., Conclusions: The described approach appears to be safe and feasible with adequate clamp times. Video assistance allows optimal visualization of the aortic root and accurate valve delivery, without conflict between the device, the camera, and the instruments, making this setting an encouraging baseline towards the assessment of the totally endoscopic approach., (© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

The case is reported of a surgical aortic valvular stenosis with a severely calcified ascending aortic root in a 76-year-old woman. The morphology and size of the aortic annulus were unsuitable for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI); thus, surgery was scheduled. Aortic calcifications allowed a transverse aortotomy 4 cm superior to the sinotubular junction, with a remote endoaortic view of the valve. A Medtronic 3f Enable sutureless bioprosthesis was then implanted after aortic annular decalcification. Sutureless bioprostheses are new tools that promise to reduce technical difficulties and cross-clamp times in minimally invasive aortic valve replacement surgery. In addition, sutureless techniques may have other possible advantages in special circumstances requiring full sternotomy access, such as in the present case.