Search

We aim to evaluate the contemporary role and outcomes of balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV), based on physician intent, for the management of severe aortic stenosis. This is a prospective, 2-center study of 100 consecutive high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis who underwent BAV. Before BAV, physicians assigned intent as (1) bridge to decision (BTD); (2) therapeutic bridge to planned therapy; or (3) palliation. Patients in the BTD arm underwent clinical assessment at 30 days to determine eligibility for definitive valve therapy. All patients were followed up to 1 year, with outcomes measured including procedural complications, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaires scores, 30-day and 1-year mortality, and definitive valve therapy. Enrolled patients had a mean age of 80.6 (±9.6) years, Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality of 11.4% (±7.1%), and 91 (91.0%) patients had class III or IV New York Heart Association congestive heart failure. Intent in the 100 study patients was 76 BTD; 20 therapeutic bridge to planned therapy; and 4 palliation. Thirty-day mortality for all patients was 6 of 100 (6.0%), and 1-year mortality for all patients who received definitive valve therapy was 6 of 54 (11.1%). For patients surviving to 30 days, adjusted (by Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality) Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaires scores were significantly improved from baseline for all patients and BTD patients. In conclusion, as a bridge to decision and treatment tool, BAV appears to have a valuable role in properly selecting and improving patients to undergo definitive valve replacement., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Because nonagenarians with aortic stenosis (AS) often present as frail with more comorbid conditions, long-term outcomes and quality of life are important treatment considerations. The aim of this report is to describe survival and functional outcomes of nonagenarians undergoing treatment for AS by surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR)., Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of all patients aged 90 years or more undergoing treatment for AS between 2007 and 2013 at two centers. Outcomes were compared between SAVR and TAVR. Long-term survival was compared with an age- and sex-matched population from the Social Security Actuarial Life Table., Results: In all, 110 patients underwent treatment for isolated AS (20 SAVR and 90 TAVR). Mean age was 91.85 ± 1.80 years, and 50.9% were female. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons mean predicted risk of mortality was 11.11% ± 5.74%. Operative mortality was 10.9% (10.0% SAVR; 11.1% TAVR); 2.7% of patients had a stroke. The TAVR patients were more likely to be discharged home (75.9% versus 55.6% for SAVR, p = 0.032). Mean follow-up was 1.8 ± 1.5 years, with a 1-year and 5-year survival of 78.7% and 45.3%, respectively, which approximated the US actuarial survival. There was a significant improvement in quality of life as measured by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire at 1 year compared with baseline., Conclusions: Treatment of AS approximates natural life expectancy in select nonagenarians, with no significant difference in long-term survival between SAVR and TAVR. Importantly, patient quality of life improved at 1 year. With appropriate selection, nonagenarians with severe AS can benefit from treatment., (Copyright © 2015 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)