Search

Objective: We sought to compare the new transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) device ACURATE neo (ACT) with the already established CoreValve (MCV) and SAPIEN XT (SXT) for the treatment of severe aortic stenosis (AS)., Background: Very few data on TAVR devices are available beyond MCV and SAPIEN and there is no previous study comparing ACT with MCV and SXT., Methods: We prospectively evaluated consecutive patients who underwent transfemoral TAVR for the treatment of severe AS. Clinical outcomes were reported following Valve Academic Research Consortium 2 (VARC-2) criteria., Results: A total of 162 patients (ACT n = 49, MCV n = 56, SXT n = 57), were included. MCV group had higher valve embolization/migration rates (ACT none; MCV 9%; SXT 2%; P = 0.034) causing lower device success rates (ACT 98%; MCV 86%; SXT 95%; P = 0.043). At 30 days, there was no significant difference in all-cause mortality (P = 0.22), cardiovascular mortality (P = 0.20), periprocedural myocardial infarction (P = 0.40), stroke (P = 0.64), major vascular complications (P = 0.48), life-threatening bleeding (P = 0.29), acute kidney injury stage 2/3 (P = 0.69), or VARC-2 composite early safety endpoints (P = 0.21). MCV group had higher rates of new permanent pacemaker implantation (ACT 6%; MCV 25%; SXT 11%; P = 0.013). Follow-up echocardiography showed no significant difference in aortic valve mean pressure gradient (P = 0.73) or moderate/severe aortic regurgitation (P = 0.19) between groups., Conclusions: In a "real world" registry, ACT compared favorably against the well-studied SXT and MCV devices in both safety and efficacy. MCV implantation was associated with lower device success rates and higher rates of new permanent pacemaker implantation. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., (© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Objectives: The objectives of the present study were to analyze the variation of renal function after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) focused on acute kidney injury (AKI) and its impact on short- and mid-term mortality., Background: Changes on renal function after TAVR and their impact on clinical outcomes are incompletely understood until now., Methods: At two tertiary centers 221 consecutive patients were submitted to TAVR. Kidney injury was defined according to VARC-2 criteria. Patients were classified according to the presence (group 1) or absence (group 2) of AKI. Creatinine values were collected daily until seventh day after procedure, 1 month, 6 months, and then 1 year after TAVR., Results: At baseline, groups were similar, except for EuroSCORE II (8.66% vs. 7.34%, P = 0.02) and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (39.59 vs. 48.49 mL/min.1.73 m 2 , P = 0.002). Overall 30 day-mortality and 1-year mortality were 6.3% and 14.0%, respectively. Both 30-day mortality (23.1% vs. 1.2%, P < 0.001) and 1-year mortality (44.2% vs. 4.7%, P < 0.001) were higher in group 1. After multivariable-adjusted models, the only independent predictor for AKI after TAVR was baseline GFR (HR: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.08-1.77, P = 0.01). The independent risk factors for 1-year mortality were AKI (HR: 15.66, 95% CI: 6.07-44.63, P < 0.001), COPD (HR: 3.14, 95% CI: 1.05-9.40, P = 0.04) and aortic regurgitation grade postprocedure ≥ 2 (P = 0.05) also after multivariate analysis., Conclusions: In this TAVR cohort, baseline GFR was the only independent predictor of AKI, which negatively impacted on 30-day and 1-year mortality. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., (© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)