Search

After 15 years of successive randomized, controlled trials, indications for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are rapidly expanding. In the coming years, this procedure could become the first line treatment for patients with a symptomatic severe aortic stenosis and a tricuspid aortic valve anatomy. However, randomized, controlled trials have excluded bicuspid aortic valve (BAV), which is the most frequent congenital heart disease occurring in 1% to 2% of the total population and representing at least 25% of patients 80 years of age or older referred for aortic valve replacement. The use of a less invasive transcatheter therapy in this elderly population became rapidly attractive, and approximately 10% of patients currently undergoing TAVR have a BAV. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the “European Conformity” have approved TAVR for low-risk patients regardless of the aortic valve anatomy whereas international guidelines recommend surgical replacement in BAV populations. Given this progressive expansion of TAVR toward younger and lower-risk patients, heart teams are encountering BAV patients more frequently, while the ability of this therapy to treat such a challenging anatomy remains uncertain. This review will address the singularity of BAV anatomy and associated technical challenges for the TAVR procedure. We will examine and summarize available clinical evidence and highlight critical knowledge gaps regarding TAVR utilization in BAV patients. We will provide a comprehensive overview of the role of computed tomography scans in the diagnosis, and classification of BAV and TAVR procedure planning. Overall, we will offer an integrated framework for understanding the current role of TAVR in the treatment of bicuspid aortic stenosis and for guiding physicians in clinical decision-making.

Background: Cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) have been observed in healthy elderly people undergoing systematic brain magnetic resonance imaging. The potential role of acute triggers on the appearance of CMBs remains unknown. We aimed to describe the incidence of new CMBs after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and to identify clinical and procedural factors associated with new CMBs including hemostatic measures and anticoagulation management. Methods: We evaluated a prospective cohort of patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis referred for TAVR for CMBs (METHYSTROKE [Identification of Epigenetic Risk Factors for Ischemic Complication During the TAVR Procedure in the Elderly]). Standardized neurologic assessment, brain magnetic resonance imaging, and analysis of hemostatic measures including von Willebrand factor were performed before and after TAVR. Numbers and location of microbleeds on preprocedural magnetic resonance imaging and of new microbleeds on postprocedural magnetic resonance imaging were reported by 2 independent neuroradiologists blinded to clinical data. Measures associated with new microbleeds and postprocedural outcome including neurologic functional outcome at 6 months were also examined. Results: A total of 84 patients (47% men, 80.9±5.7 years of age) were included. On preprocedural magnetic resonance imaging, 22 patients (26% [95% CI, 17%–37%]) had at least 1 microbleed. After TAVR, new microbleeds were observed in 19 (23% [95% CI, 14%–33%]) patients. The occurrence of new microbleeds was independent of the presence of microbleeds at baseline and of diffusion-weighted imaging hypersignals. In univariable analysis, a previous history of bleeding ( P =0.01), a higher total dose of heparin ( P =0.02), a prolonged procedure ( P =0.03), absence of protamine reversion ( P =0.04), higher final activated partial thromboplastin time ( P =0.05), lower final von Willebrand factor high-molecular-weight:multimer ratio ( P =0.007), and lower final closure time with adenosine–diphosphate ( P =0.02) were associated with the occurrence of new postprocedural microbleeds. In multivariable analysis, a prolonged procedure (odds ratio, 1.22 [95% CI, 1.03–1.73] for every 5 minutes of fluoroscopy time; P =0.02) and postprocedural acquired von Willebrand factor defect (odds ratio, 1.42 [95% CI, 1.08–1.89] for every lower 0.1 unit of high-molecular-weight:multimer ratio; P =0.004) were independently associated with the occurrence of new postprocedural microbleeds. New CMBs were not associated with changes in neurologic functional outcome or quality of life at 6 months. Conclusions: One out of 4 patients undergoing TAVR has CMBs before the procedure and 1 out of 4 patients develops new CMBs. Procedural or antithrombotic management and persistence of acquired von Willebrand factor defect were associated with the occurrence of new CMBs. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT02972008.

International audience; Background: Balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) has been proposed as a therapeutic option in patients suffering from severe aortic stenosis (SAS) who need urgent non-cardiac surgery (NCS). Whether this strategy is better than medical therapy in this very specific population is unknown. Aims: We aimed to evaluate the clinical benefit of an invasive strategy (IS) with preoperative BAV in patients with SAS requiring urgent NCS. Methods: From 2011 to 2019, a registry conducted in two centres included 133 patients with SAS undergoing urgent NCS, of whom 93 underwent preoperative BAV (IS) and 40 a conservative strategy (CS) without BAV. All analyses were adjusted for confounding using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) (10 clinical and anatomical variables). Results: The primary outcome was MACE at one-month follow-up after NCS including mortality, heart failure, and other cardiovascular outcomes. In patients managed conservatively, occurrence of MACE was 20.0% (n=8) and death was 10.0% (n=4) at 1 month. In patients undergoing BAV, the occurrence of MACE was 20.4% (n=19) and death was 5.4% (n=5) at 1 month. Among patients undergoing conservative management, all events were observed after NCS while, in patients undergoing BAV, 12.9% (n=12) had events between BAV and NCS including 3 deaths, and 7.5% (n=7) had events after NCS including 2 deaths. In IPTW propensity analyses, the incidence of the primary outcome (20.4% vs 20.0%; OR 0.93, 95% CI: 0.38-2.29) and three-month survival (89.2% vs 90.0%; IPTW-adjusted HR 0.90, 95% CI: 0.31-2.60) were similar in both groups. Conclusions: Patients with SAS managed conservatively before urgent NCS are at high risk of events. A systematic invasive strategy using BAV does not provide a significant improvement in clinical outcome.

Summary Background Transfemoral percutaneous transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TF-TAVI) is a safe, reproducible and established procedure, mainly performed under local anaesthesia, which is mostly administered and monitored by a dedicated anaesthesia team (regular approach). Our centre has developed a standardized pathway of care, and eligible patients are selected for a minimalist TF-TAVI, entirely managed by operators without the presence of the anaesthesia team in the operating room, like most interventional coronary procedures (“percutaneous coronary intervention-like” approach [PCI approach]). Aim To compare the safety and efficacy of TF-TAVI performed with the PCI approach versus the regular approach. Methods The analysis population comprised all patients who underwent TF-TAVI with the PCI or regular approach in our institution from November 2016 to July 2019. The two co-primary endpoints were early safety composite and early efficacy composite at 30 days as defined by the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2. The PCI (n = 137) and Regular (n = 221) approaches were compared using the propensity score based method of inverse probability of treatment weighting. Results No differences were observed after comparison of TAVI performed with the PCI or regular approach regarding the composite safety endpoint (7.3% vs. 11.3%; odds ratio 0.63, 95% confidence interval 0.37 to 1.07; P = 0.086) or the composite efficacy endpoint (4.4% vs. 6.3%; odds ratio 0.78, 95% confidence interval 0.41 to 1.49; P = 0.45). Conclusions This study suggests that the efficacy and safety of TF-TAVI entirely managed by a PCI approach for selected patients are not different to those when TF-TAVI is performed with the attendance of a full anaesthesia care team. The PCI approach appears to be a safe and efficient clinical pathway, providing an appropriate and rational utilization of anaesthesiology resources, and could be used for the majority of TF-TAVI procedures.

Aims The aim of the study was to assess the outcomes of balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) as a rescue therapy in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) related to severe aortic stenosis (AS). Methods and results Forty-four consecutive patients, n=31 with hypotensive CS (HCS) and n=13 with non-hypotensive CS (NHCS) due to acutely decompensated severe AS, from two centres were treated with urgent BAV. The composite primary endpoint was mortality or recurrent CS at one-year follow-up. These patients (77.3±8.1 years old; 75% male) had a mean EuroSCORE II of 41.6±13.7%. One-month mortality was 47%. Twelve patients (27%) had either a staged TAVR (n=10) or surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) (n=2) with a median delay of 79 days after BAV: n=6 (19%) in the HCS subgroup and n=6 (46%) in the NHCS population (p=0.06). At one year, the rate of composite all-cause death or recurrent CS was 75% and significantly higher in the HCS subgroup (83% vs. 53%; p=0.03). Overall one-year mortality was 70% (n=31) with a trend for a better prognosis in NHCS patients (54% vs. 77%; p=0.09). Univariate predictive factors of the primary endpoint included preoperative dose of dobutamine >5 microg/kg/min (100% vs. 57%; p=0.001) and delayed BAV >48 hrs (90% vs. 59%; p=0.01). Conclusions Despite the initial success of urgent BAV, morbidity and mortality of CS related to severe AS remain high and directly related to the time of the valvuloplasty. Performing BAV before or within 48 hours of starting inotropic agents appears to be key to survival.

Significant paravalvular regurgitation (PVR) remains a relatively frequent (4% to 9%) and deleterious complication of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), even with the latest generation of bioprosthesis. Although mini-invasive TAVR without general anesthesia or transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is progressively becoming the predominant approach, identification and grading of PVR in the catheterization laboratory remain an important and challenging clinical issue. The authors discuss how a recently reported blood biomarker reflecting the von Willebrand factor activity, that is, the closure time with adenosine diphosphate, can be successfully applied during the TAVR procedure to detect and monitor PVR in real time, with an excellent negative predictive value. This point-of-care testing performed directly in the catheterization laboratory may improve the diagnosis of PVR and rationalize the decision of whether or not to perform corrective measures. They further discuss how such a test could be a substitute for the multimodal approach combining TEE, hemodynamics, and cine-angiography, and help to secure the transition to the mini-invasive approach and facilitate the expanding indications of less invasive procedures to lower-risk patients without jeopardizing procedural and clinical outcomes.