Search

Background: Little epidemiological information on acute aortic dissection (AAD) is available in the literature. The objective of the present study was to determine the incidence and mortality rates of AAD in the general population and to analyze its clinical features., Methods: Data from the Emilia-Romagna regional database of hospital admissions was analyzed. Urgent admissions with the diagnosis of dissection of the aorta, dissection of the thoracic aorta and dissection of the thoracoabdominal aorta were selected., Results: Between January 2000 and December 2008, 1499 Emilia-Romagna residents were hospitalized with a diagnosis of AAD. The patients were divided into three groups: Group A, 617 patients (41.2%) surgically treated for type A AAD; Group B, 93 complicated patients (6.2%) with type B AAD treated by endovascular stent-grafting and Group C, 789 patients (52.6%) suffering from any type of AAD medically treated. The overall annual incidence rate was 4.7%/100,000 people and was higher for men than for women (6.7% vs 2.9%).Two hundred ninety-six patients (19.8%) were 80 years of age or older.The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 27.7%, with mortality rates of 21.1%, 26.9% and 33% in Groups A, B and C, respectively., Conclusion: The incidence of AAD is not negligible and a notable rate of patients is ultra-octogenarian. A large number of patients with AAD had no surgery or interventional treatment. The results of surgical treatment for patients with type A dissection are acceptable but the results obtained in patients with complicated type B dissection who were treated with an endoprosthesis are dismal., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Acute type A aortic dissection (AAAD) remains one of the most challenging diseases in cardiothoracic surgery, and despite numerous innovations, early mortality still remains high. The aim of this study was to review the Emilia-Romagna experience in the treatment of AAAD and to evaluate the effect of malperfusion on mortality and morbidity., Methods: We examined data of 502 patients between January 2000 and December 2008, from the Emilia-Romagna Regional Registry of AAAD. The mean age was 62.4 ± 13 years and 66.5% were male. At presentation, various types of malperfusion syndromes (cerebral, cardiac, ileo-femoral, renal, mesenteric and spinal cord) were present in 103 patients (20.5%; malperfusion [MPS] group). Three hundred ninety-nine patients (No-MPS group) did not have pre-operative malperfusion. Arterial access for cardiopulmonary bypass was usually via the femoral artery (81.9%), while the axillary artery was used only in 14.7%. The aortic repair was performed using the 'open technique' in 348 patients (69.3%) and with aortic cross-clamping without circulatory arrest in 154 patients (30.7%)., Results: Overall in-hospital mortality was 20.9%: 43.7% in the MPS group vs 15% in the No-MPS group (P = 0.001). The operative technique and the cannulation site did not influence post-operative outcomes. Multivariate regression analysis identified mesenteric (odds ratio [OR] 9.5, confidence interval [CI] 2.4-37.4; P = 0.0012), cardiac malperfusion (OR 3.7, CI 1.7-8.0; P < 0.0001) and shock (OR 2.1, CI 1.2-3.5; P = 0.007) as significant risk factors for in-hospital mortality after surgery for type A dissection. Patients who presented single-organ malperfusion had a mortality rate of 34.7%, which increased to 61.9% and to 85.7% if two or more than two organ systems were involved, respectively., Conclusions: The results of the surgical treatment of AAAD are acceptable and mainly influenced by patient's status at presentation. Malperfusion of more organ systems makes the prognosis unfavourable and immediate proximal aortic repair may be sub-optimal. In these situations, alternative management strategies should be considered.