Search

Objectives: We aimed to determine whether non-A non-B aortic dissection (AD) differs in morphologic and haemodynamic properties from type B AD., Methods: We simulated and compared haemodynamics of patients with acute type B or acute non-A non-B AD by means of computational fluid dynamics. Wall pressure and wall shear stress (WSS) in both the true lumen (TL) and false lumen (FL) at early, mid- and late systole were evaluated. Morphology, WSS and the FL/TL wall pressure ratio were compared between groups., Results: Nineteen patients (type B, n = 7; non-A non-B, n = 12) were included. The median age (51 [46, 67] vs 53 [50, 63] years; P = 0.71) and a complicated course (14% vs 33%; P = 0.6) did not differ between the type B group and the non-A non-B group. However, the median entry tear width was increased in the non-A non-B group (9.7 [7.3, 12.7] vs 16.3 [11.9, 24.9] mm; P = 0.010). Streamlines showed, in patients with non-A non-B AD, blood from the TL flowed into the FL via the entry tear. Prevalence of a FL/TL wall pressure ratio >1.0 (type B versus non-A non-B) at early, mid- and late systole was 57% vs 83% (P = 0.31), 43% vs 83% (P = 0.13) and 57% vs 75% (P = 0.62), respectively. WSS did not differ between the groups., Conclusions: The increased FL/TL wall pressure ratio observed during systole in non-A non-B AD may beget a complicated presentation., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery.)

Objectives: The anatomical distribution pattern of epidural intraspinal arteries is not entirely understood but is likely to substantially impact maintaining perfusion during segmental artery sacrifice when treating acute and chronic thoraco-abdominal aortic diseases. We investigated the anatomical distribution pattern of intraspinal arteries., Methods: Twenty fresh, non-embalmed cadaveric human bodies were studied. Anatomical dissection and investigation of the epidural arterial network were performed according to a standardized protocol. We used a generalized mixed linear model to test whether the presence probability for certain vessels differed between vertebrae/segments., Results: There was craniocaudal continuity of all ipsilateral longitudinal connections from T1 to L5 by the anterior radicular artery. The mean [±standard deviation (SD)] number of transverse anastomoses was 9.7 ± 2.1. The presence probability of transverse anastomoses along the spine was different between vertebrae (P < 0.0001). There were 2 distribution peaks along the spine: 1 peak around T4-T6 and 1 around T11. The mean (±SD) number of thoracic and lumbar anterior radiculomedullary arteries (ARMAs) was 3.0 ± 1.1. The probability of the presence of ARMAs along the spine was different for each vertebral segment (P < 0.0001). Between ARMAs there were gaps of up to a maximum of 9 vertebrae. All Adamkiewicz arteries were located caudally to T7. The median segment of the Adamkiewicz presence was T10/11., Conclusions: The epidural collateral network shows craniocaudal continuity. The number of transverse anastomoses is high. The number of ARMAs is low, and there is considerable variation in their distribution and offspring, which is highly likely to impact perfusion during segmental artery sacrifice when treating thoraco-abdominal aortic disease., (© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Background: Measuring transcranial motor evoked potentials (EPs) and somatosensory EPs is a well-established method to assess spinal cord function during thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Functional occlusion of one or both internal iliac arteries by large bore sheaths during TEVAR can cause unilateral intermittently EP loss., Methods: Between 2006 and 2016, 194 patients underwent TEVAR entailing EP monitoring. The ISIS IOM System (Inomed Medizintechnik GmbH, Emmendingen, Germany) was employed in all patients. EPs were recorded after inducing anesthesia, during the procedure, and before discontinuing anesthesia., Results: We observed a unilateral intermittently EP decrease or loss in 12 (6.2%) patients. Most events were ipsilateral (9 of 12). The underlying pathologies were descending aortic aneurysm in six patients and type B dissection in six patients. An evoked-potential decrease or loss was always associated with the insertion of large bore stent-graft-introducing sheaths. The median duration of the unilaterally EP decrease or loss was 16 (10; 31) minutes (range, 2-77 minutes) with baseline values re-established at the end of the procedure after sheath removal in all cases. No patient developed irreversible symptomatic spinal cord ischemia., Conclusion: A functional occlusion of internal iliac arteries via large bore TEVAR-introducing sheaths is associated with a unilateral intermittent decrease in or loss of EPs returning to baseline after sheath removal. This observation highlights the importance of the internal iliac arteries as one of the major spinal cord's blood supply territories, and may serve as a stimulus to reduce the duration of sheath indwelling to a minimum., Competing Interests: None declared., (Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Objectives: Our goal was to report our preliminary results in patients with acute complicated Type B aortic dissection without a suitable landing zone for primary thoracic endovascular aortic repair who were treated with the frozen elephant trunk (FET) technique., Methods: Within a 25-month period, 14 patients with acute complicated Type B aortic dissection underwent surgical repair using the FET technique. The reasons to perform the FET procedure were an ectatic ascending aorta/arch in 6 patients and the lack of an adequate landing zone in 8 patients., Results: No deaths were observed. A non-disabling stroke occurred in 2 patients. Symptomatic spinal cord injury was not observed. The closure of the primary entry tear was successfully achieved in all patients. In 3 patients, a secondary distal thoracic endovascular aortic repair extension was performed during the same hospital stay. The median follow-up period was 6 ± 5 months., Conclusions: The FET technique is an attractive method for the repair of acute complicated Type B aortic dissection without a suitable landing zone for primary thoracic endovascular aortic repair. It should be considered as an alternative in patients who are at high risk for retrograde Type A aortic dissection, in patients with an unfavourable anatomy or in patients with connective tissue disease., (© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Background: To report a new technique for diameter correction in patients after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) with large stent-grafts using the Vascutek Siena 4-branch collared prosthesis (Vascutek Terumo, Inchinnan, Scotland, UK) in patients undergoing thoracoabdominal (TA) aortic replacement., Methods: Within a 24-month period, 39 patients underwent TA replacement at our center. Of these, 6 patients had undergone previous TEVAR with large stent-grafts (42 to 48 mm diameter). Indications for TEVAR were aneurysm formation in 3 patients and residual type B aortic dissection (status post repair of type A dissection) in 3 patients. In these patients, the Vascutek Siena 4-branch prosthesis was used in a reversed fashion, removing the elephant trunk portion and using the sewing collar for diameter correction at the anastomotic site., Results: No 30-day mortality and no stroke or symptomatic spinal cord ischemia was observed. Median diameter of the TEVAR graft at the anastomotic site was 44 mm. Median size of the Siena graft used was 26 mm. Diameter correction was successfully achieved in all patients by tailoring the sewing collar of the Siena 4-branch prosthesis to the individual need according to the diameter of the distal end of the stent-graft., Conclusions: Using the sewing collar of the Vascutek Siena 4-branch prosthesis for diameter correction in patients undergoing TA replacement after previous TEVAR with large stent-grafts adds a useful adjunct to the armamentarium of options in a growing patient population., (Copyright © 2018 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is used for treatment of thoracic aortic pathologies, but the covered stent graft can induce spinal ischaemia depending on the length used. The left subclavian artery contributes to spinal cord collateralization and is frequently occluded by the stent graft. Our objective was to investigate the impact of covered stent graft length on the risk of spinal ischaemia in the setting of left subclavian artery sacrifice., Methods: Twenty-six pigs (German country race, mean body weight 36 ± 4 kg) underwent simulated descending aortic TEVAR via left lateral thoracotomy, with left subclavian artery and thoracic segmental artery occlusion in normothermia. Animals were assigned to treatment groups according to simulated stent graft length: TEVAR to T8 (n = 4), TEVAR to T9 (n = 4), TEVAR to T10 (n = 4), TEVAR to T11 (n = 7) and TEVAR to T12 (n = 1) and a sham group (n = 6). End points included spinal cord perfusion pressure, cerebrospinal fluid pressure and spinal cord blood flow using fluorescent microspheres., Results: There were no group differences in spinal cord perfusion pressure drop or in spinal cord perfusion pressure regeneration potential at 3 h after the procedure: from a baseline average of 75 mmHg (95% confidence interval 71-83 mmHg) to 73 mmHg (67-75 mmHg) at 3 h in Group T10 versus from a baseline average of 67 mmHg (95% CI 50-81 mmHg) to 65 mmHg (95% confidence interval 48-81 mmHg) in Group T8. There were no differences in the spinal cord blood flow courses over time in the different groups nor was there any difference in cerebrospinal fluid pressure levels and cerebrospinal fluid pressure dynamics between groups. However, we did observe local blood flow distribution to the spinal cord that was inhomogeneous depending on the distance between the simulated stent graft end and the first thoracic anterior radiculomedullary artery., Conclusions: The risk of spinal ischaemia after serial segmental artery occlusion does not depend on the distal extent of the aortic repair alone. Future attempts to allow patient risk stratification for spinal ischaemia need to focus on anterior radiculomedullary artery anatomy together with the extent of planned aortic repair., (© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Our aim was to report outcome of patients with acute non-A non-B aortic dissection involving the aortic arch but not the ascending aorta., Methods: Dissection extension and entry location were analysed in patients with acute aortic dissection admitted between 2001 and 2016 at a tertiary centre. Non-A non-B dissection was classified as descending-entry type with entry distal to the left subclavian artery and dissection extending into the aortic arch, and arch-entry type with entry between the innominate and left subclavian arteries. We compared these 2 groups' clinical presentation, treatment and outcome., Results: Among 396 acute aortic dissection patients, 43 (median age 60 ± 12 years, 81% males) had non-A non-B dissection (descending-entry n = 21, arch-entry n = 22). The overwhelming majority of aortic segments were not dilated in all these patients. The 2 groups' cardiovascular risk profiles did not differ. Emergency open or endovascular aortic repair were necessary due to malperfusion or aortic rupture in 29% descending-entry and 36% arch-entry (in-hospital mortality was 1/6 and 3/8, respectively). Aortic repair within 2 weeks due to new organ malperfusion, rapid aortic growth, aortic rupture or persisting pain was performed in 43% descending-entry and 36% arch-entry patients (0% in-hospital mortality). All others (except for 1 diagnosed in 2014) required aortic repair for aneurysm at follow-up., Conclusions: Acute non-A non-B aortic dissection frequently requires emergency aortic repair due to organ malperfusion or aortic rupture. Most descending-entry and arch-entry non-A non-B dissection patients undergo aortic repair within 2 weeks after dissection onset., (© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

We present our surgical strategy in a patient with a bicuspid aortic valve Type I (R/N), aortic root aneurysm and papillary fibroelastoma on the aortic valve's cusp. He underwent valve-sparing aortic root replacement (David V Procedure); we also removed the papillary fibroelastoma from the fused right- and non-coronary cusp. In this case, we used a 34-mm straight Dacron graft for root replacement and an aortic annulus downsized to 30 mm. We use Hegar dilatators for the intraoperative measurement of the aortic annulus. The subvalvular sutures are pledged U-sutures and our usual technique in bicuspid aortic valve is to take 2 on each commissure and 5 on each side so that we end up with 12. For the reimplantation of the aortic rim, we prefer a semi-circumferential suture with a small needle. We plicate the non-fused left cusp, which is our reference for the later reconstruction of the common right- and non-coronary cusp. The key strategy of our bicuspid valve reconstruction is aiming at a 180° non-fused commissure orientation and cusp plication. The coronary ostia and aortic root are marked intraoperatively with a radiopaque marker to facilitate postoperative diagnostics and any future interventions including later catheter-based valve interventions., (© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Objective: In patients with acute type A aortic dissection involving the innominate artery, it is unclear whether right axillary artery cannulation for arterial inflow is safe. We evaluated the surgical outcomes of patients with dissected innominate artery according to different arterial cannulation sites., Methods: From 2005 to 2014, of 416 patients with acute type A aortic dissection and preoperative computed tomography angiography in 2 centers, 186 (aged 63 ± 13 years; 43% were female; 95% with DeBakey type I) had dissected innominate artery (84%, 9%, and 7% involving its entire length or more or less than half of its length, respectively). Neurologic complications, in-hospital mortality, and survival were compared between patients with right axillary (N = 84) and non-right axillary (N = 102) cannulation sites. Median follow-up was 30 months (range, 0-130 months)., Results: In-hospital mortality was 9.5% and 10.8% (P = .97) for patients with right and non-right axillary cannulation, respectively. Seven patients (8.3%) with right axillary cannulation and 9 patients (8.8%; P = .89) with non-right axillary cannulation had a new-onset postoperative stroke. The axillary artery was cannulated (although dissected) in 8 patients. None of them had a new-onset stroke or died perioperatively. The innominate artery remodeling was observed on follow-up computed tomography in 12% of right axillary cases and 14% of non-right axillary cases (P = .82). Survival did not differ between right axillary and non-right axillary cases, and measured 92% ± 3% versus 87% ± 4% and 85% ± 5% versus 73% ± 9% at 1 and 5 years, respectively (log rank, P = .29)., Conclusions: The right axillary artery is safe to cannulate for arterial inflow in patients with type A aortic dissection with dissected innominate artery., (Copyright © 2016 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Large-sized root aneurysm and high-grade aortic regurgitation (AR) might be contraindications for a valve-sparing aortic root replacement procedure (V-SARR) and aortic valve repair. The impact of a combination of root reimplantation and additional cusp/commissure repair on valve sufficiency in this setting was investigated with respect to early- and mid-term functional outcome., Methods: Out of a cohort of 220 patients treated with V-SARR, 73 with an aneurysm size ≥ 55 mm were identified. As a cut-off for high-grade preoperative AR, a grade of ≥ 3 was defined. End points were absolute early and mid-term aortic regurgitation grades, new incidence of AR and AR progression. The mean echocardiographic follow-up time was 3.8 years. T-tests, Kaplan-Meier and log-rank calculations were employed., Results: Within the studied cohort of large aneurysms ≥ 55 mm [total, n = 73; mean age, 56 ± 14 years; female, n = 22 (30%); Marfan, n = 9 (12%); bicuspid valve n = 6 (8%)], 21 (29%) individuals had AR grades ≥ 3+. The rest had lower grade AR (63%) and 6 (8%) had a normally functioning aortic valve. The incidence rate of additional cusp procedures was 27% (n = 20) and included cusp plication, Trussler Stitch, cusp shaving and commissure resuspension. Incidence of additional cusp/commissure repair was 2 (9.5%) among patients with higher grade AR ≥ 3+, while it was 18 (30%) among patients with lower grade AR or a normally functioning valve (P = 0.03). The mean early postoperative AR was 0.5 (median, 1.0). The rate of freedom from early failure, valve replacement and AR ≥ 2 was 96%. The rate of freedom from AR progression was 96% and from new onset AR was 100%., Conclusions: The setting of a large proximal thoracic aortic aneurysm size and high-grade AR does not result in a higher need for cusp/commissure procedures in order to achieve a satisfactory mid-term functional outcome. Large aneurysm size and high-grade AR per se do not increase the complexity of repair. The choice of reimplantation technique and prosthesis size selection might impact on mid-term valve function., (© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Technical variations of the David reimplantation valve-sparing aortic root replacement (V-SARR) procedure have been proposed to be advantageous in patients with connective tissue disease, such as the Marfan syndrome (MFS). We report results of a Marfan cohort treated exclusively with the non-modified David I procedure., Methods: Forty-eight Marfan patients (25 males, mean age 33 ± 12 years, range 15-62 years) underwent the original variant of the David V-SARR (David I) between 1997 and 2013. Forty-two operations (88%) were performed as elective procedures for aortic root aneurysms and six for acute dissections (12%). Seventeen had aortic regurgitation (AR) grades ≥2+ preoperatively, and 3 had AR >2+. No patients with severe AR (4+) were selected for V-SARR. Three full or hemi-arch replacements were performed. Patients who were operated on using a variation of the David I or David II procedure were excluded., Results: Mean prosthesis size was 28 ± 3 mm (18-30 mm). Mean clinical and echocardiographic follow-up (98% complete) was 3.8 ± 3.7 years with a cumulative follow-up of 178 patient-years. The early mortality rate was 2% (one hospital death). The survival rate was 98% (95% confidence 84-99%) at 4 years and 90% (57-98%) at 8 years with 5 patients at risk at 10 years. The rate of freedom from root or valve reoperation was 97% (79-99%) and 97% (79-99%) at 4 and 8 years, respectively. Only one patient required mechanical aortic valve replacement for progression of AR., Conclusions: Despite potential theoretical drawbacks of the David I V-SARR technique without neo-sinuses or a neo-sinotubular junction, it results in a favourable mid-term outcome in Marfan patients and compares well with reported results of different modifications of David V-SARR., (© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The purpose of this study is to delineate changes in aortic geometry and diameter due to dissection., Background: Aortic diameter is the major criterion for elective ascending aortic replacement for dilated ascending aortas to prevent aortic dissection. However, recommendations are made on the basis of clinical experience and observation of diameters of previously dissected aortas., Methods: Six tertiary centers on 2 continents reviewed their acute aortic dissection type A databases, which contained 1,821 patients. Included were all non-Marfan patients with nonbicuspid aortic valves who had undergone computed tomography angiography <2 years before and within 12 h after aortic dissection onset. Aortic geometry before and after dissection onset were compared., Results: Altogether, 63 patients were included (27 spontaneous and 36 retrograde dissections, median age 68 [57; 77] years; 54% were men). In all but 1 patient, maximum ascending aortic diameter was <55 mm before aortic dissection onset. The largest increase in diameter and volume induced by the dissection were observed in the ascending aorta (40.1 [36.6; 45.3] mm vs. 52.9 [46.1; 58.6] mm, +12.8 mm; p < 0.001; 124.0 [90.8; 162.5] cm(3) vs. 171.0 [147.0; 197.0] cm(3), +47 cm(3); p < 0.001). Mean aortic arch diameter increased from 39.8 (30.5; 42.6) mm to 46.4 (42.0; 51.6) mm (+6.6 mm; p < 0.001) and descending thoracic aorta diameter from 31.2 (27.0; 33.3) mm to 34.9 (30.9; 39.5) mm (+3.7 mm; p < 0.001). Changes in thoracic aorta geometry were similar for spontaneous and retrograde etiology., Conclusions: Geometry of the thoracic aorta is affected by aortic dissection, leading to an increase in diameter that is most pronounced in the ascending aorta. Both spontaneous and retrograde dissection result in similar aortic geometry changes., (Copyright © 2014 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The spinal cord is particularly susceptible to ischaemic injury following repair of extensive descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAA). For the past decade, the Mount Sinai group in New York has intensively studied the anatomy of the extensive vascular network surrounding the spinal cord, as well as its dynamic morphology in response to decreased blood pressure and flow. Along with clinical data, experimental findings gave rise to the Collateral Network Concept, by which spinal cord injury in open TAAA repair can be significantly reduced. With the more recent widespread use of endovascular repair, strategies to prevent ischaemic spinal cord damage after extensive segmental artery sacrifice/occlusion are still evolving. The hypothesis that dividing extensive aneurysm repair into two steps may mitigate the impact of diminished blood flow to the collateral network has led to a recently conducted series of staged repair experiments. By exploiting the resources of the collateral network, spinal cord injury could be minimised in staged open, as well as in staged hybrid repair and seems equally adoptable for endovascular procedures. The contribution presented herein provides an overview of clinical and experimental studies on the staged approach. Furthermore, it briefly assesses the anatomic rationale for the collateral network concept., (Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Objectives: To investigate mid-term outcome in patients undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for non-dissected aortic pathology with favourable and unfavourable landing zone and aortic anatomy., Methods: Between 2000 and 2011, TEVAR was performed in 208 patients with descending thoracic aortic disease. Of 105 patients with non-dissected thoracic aortic pathology, 69 presented with unfavourable anatomy as defined by short length (<15 mm), large diameter (>42 mm), angulation of >60° of the proximal or distal landing zone or extreme aortic tortuosity. The endpoints perioperative mortality, 1-year survival, endoleak occurrence and incidence of secondary intervention were compared with the remaining 36 patients with favourable anatomy., Results: Median follow-up was 18 months. TEVAR was performed emergently in 24 of 69 (35%) patients with unfavourable anatomy and in 11 of 36 (31%) of those with favourable anatomy (P = 0.68). No patients underwent conversion to open surgery, no periinterventional rupture was observed. Perioperative mortality did not differ between cohorts (1/69 vs 1/36, P = 0.78). Postoperative permanent spinal cord ischaemia occurred in patients with unfavourable anatomy only (2/69 vs 0/36, P = 0.78). Early endoleak and secondary intervention were more frequent in patients with unfavourable anatomy (19/69 vs 7/36 and 13/69 vs 1/36), but not statistically significant (P = 0.5 and P = 0.13, respectively). One-year aorta-related survival rates were similar in both groups (66/69 vs 33/36, P = 0.45)., Conclusions: Mid-term outcome after TEVAR does not differ between patients with favourable and unfavourable landing zone anatomy in terms of aorta-related survival. However, the more frequent need for secondary intervention warrants a more rigorous follow-up after TEVAR in patients with unfavourable anatomy.

Background: Reoperative descending thoracic aorta (DTA) or thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) surgery is a challenge because of increased risk of lung injury and diffuse bleeding., Methods: Sixty patients (34 male, mean age 54.4 years) underwent redo thoracotomy for DTA (22 patients) or extended thoracoabdominal incision for reoperative TAAA (38 patients) from March 1988 to June 2007, after 1.7 +/- 0.9 previous cardioaortic procedures. Forty-one patients were hypertensive (68%), 18 were smokers (30%), 9 had Marfan syndrome (15%), 9 had coronary artery disease (15%), 5 had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (8%), and 3 had diabetes mellitus (5%). In all, 45% (27 patients) had previous dissection, 30% (18) had atherosclerotic aneurysms, 15% had coarctation surgery (9), and 6 patients had other etiologies. Mean follow-up, 100% complete, was 6.5 years., Results: Hospital mortality for reoperative DTA/TAAA was 13.3% (8 patients). Although 6.3 +/- 2.9 (0 to 14) segmental artery pairs were sacrificed at reoperation-and 6.2 +/- 2.3 (1 to 12) initially-for a total of 10.6 +/- 3.9 (2 to 15) segmental artery pairs sacrificed, only 1 patient had paraplegia (1.6%). Four patients had a 2-day procedure, with 12 to 24 hours of intensive care unit recovery after lysis of extensive adhesions: all survived. Respiratory complications occurred in 13 patients (21.6%), and permanent dialysis was required in 2 (3.3%), but there were no strokes. Adverse outcome-1-year mortality, stroke, permanent dialysis, or paraplegia-occurred in 13 patients (21.6%). Adverse outcome was marginally associated (p < 0.2) with increased age, atherosclerotic aneurysms (33% versus 17% other), TAA incision (30% versus 9%), and greater aneurysm extent, and was significantly associated with perfusion technique (p = 0.02). Adverse outcome occurred in 3 of 4 patients who had clamp-and-sew technique, 6 of 21 using partial cardiopulmonary bypass (28.6%), and 3 of 17 with partial left heart bypass (17.7%), but only 1 of 18 with hypothermic circulatory arrest (5.6%)., Conclusions: Reoperative DTA/TAAA repair was significantly safer with hypothermic circulatory arrest rather than partial cardiopulmonary bypass, partial left heart bypass, or clamp-and-sew strategy. A 2-day procedure may be advisable for patients with extensive adhesions.

Objectives: Repair of thoracic aneurysms (TA) involving the ascending, arch, and descending aorta results in substantial morbidity and mortality. This study evaluates outcomes with a two-stage elephant trunk (ET) technique., Methods: Two hundred and fifteen consecutive patients (pts) underwent total arch replacement using an ET (02/90-09/06). One hundred and thirty-nine pts (65%), group PC (planned completion; median age 68; 28-86 years), had extensive descending TA (Ø>/=5 cm) or dissections requiring complete repair. Seventy-six pts (35%), group CS (close surveillance; median age: 68; 20-87 years), had less severe distal dilatation (Ø

Objective: Spinal cord blood flow (SCBF) after sacrifice of thoracoabdominal aortic segmental arteries (TAASA) during thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair remains poorly understood. This study explored SCBF for 72 h after sacrifice of all TAASA., Methods: Fourteen juvenile Yorkshire pigs underwent complete serial TAASA sacrifice (T4-L5). Six control pigs underwent anesthesia and cooling to 32 degrees C with no TAASA sacrifice. In the experimental animals, spinal cord function was continuously monitored using motor evoked potentials (MEPs) until 1h after clamping the last TAASA. Fluorescent microspheres enabled segmental measurement of SCBF along the entire spinal cord before, and 5 min, 1 h, 5 h, 24 h and 72 h after complete TAASA sacrifice. A modified Tarlov score was obtained for 3 days after surgery., Results: All the pigs with complete TAASA sacrifice retained normal cord function (MEP) until 1h after TAASA ligation. Seven pigs (50%) with complete TAASA sacrifice recovered after 72 h; seven pigs suffered paraparesis or paraplegia. Intraoperatively, and until 1h postoperatively, SCBF was similar among the three groups along the entire cord. Postoperatively, SCBF did not decrease in any group, but significant hyperemia occurred at 5h in controls and recovery animals, but did not occur in pigs that developed paraparesis or paraplegia in the T8-L2 segments (p=0.0002) and L3-S segments (p=0.0007). At 24h, SCBF remained marginally lower from T8 caudally; at 72h, SCBF was similar among all groups along the entire cord. SCBF in the segments T8-L2 at 5h predicted functional recovery (p=0.003)., Conclusions: This study suggests that critical spinal cord ischemia after complete TAASA sacrifice does not occur immediately (intraoperatively), but is delayed 1-5h or longer after clamping, and represents failure to mount a hyperemic response to rewarming and awakening. The short duration of low SCBF associated with spinal cord injury suggests that hemodynamic and metabolic manipulation lasting only 24-72 h may allow routine preservation of normal cord function despite sacrifice of all TAASA secondary to surgical or endovascular repair of large TAAA.

Objective: Spinal cord injury can occur not only during extensive thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair but also postoperatively, causing delayed-onset paraplegia., Methods: A series of 858 thoracoabdominal aneurysm repairs (June 1990-June 2006) with an overall paraplegia rate of 2.7% was analyzed retrospectively. Serial segmental artery sacrifice was monitored by using somatosensory evoked potentials; segmental arteries were not reimplanted. Of a total of 20 cases of paraplegia, 3 occurred intraoperatively and 7 occurred late postoperatively: these will not be analyzed further. In 10 cases (the paraplegia group) spinal cord injury occurred within 48 hours after thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair, despite intact somatosensory evoked potentials at the end of the procedure. These patients with early postoperative delayed paraplegia were compared with 10 matched control subjects who recovered without spinal cord injury., Results: In the paraplegia group a median of 9 segmental arteries (range, 5-12 segmental arteries) were sacrificed. There were 9 male subjects: median age was 63 years (range, 40-79 years), and 4 of 10 had cerebrospinal fluid drainage. A median of 9 segmental arteries (range, 2-12 segmental arteries) were also sacrificed in the matched recovery group. There were 4 male subjects; median age was 66 years (range, 40-78 years), and 8 of 10 had cerebrospinal fluid drainage. During the first 48 hours postoperatively, there were no significant differences in arterial and mixed venous oxygen saturation, partial arterial O2 and CO2 pressures, body temperature, glucose, hematocrit, or pH. The mean central venous pressures, however, were significantly higher in the paraplegic patients from 1 to 5 hours postoperatively (P = .03). In addition, although absolute mean aortic pressures did not differ between matched pairs postoperatively, when pressures were considered as a percentage of individual antecedent preoperative mean aortic pressure, paraplegic patients had significantly lower values during the first 5 hours postoperatively (P = .03)., Conclusions: This study suggests that paraplegia can result from inadequate postoperative spinal cord perfusion caused by relatively minor differences from control subjects in perfusion parameters. Delayed paraplegia can perhaps be prevented with better hemodynamic and fluid management.