Search

Background and Aims: Arterial stiffness is an independent predictor of cardiovascular disease (CVD) events and all-cause mortality and may be differentially affected by dietary fatty acid (FA) intake. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between FA consumption and arterial stiffness and blood pressure in a community-based population., Methods and Results: The Caerphilly Prospective Study recruited 2398 men, aged 45-59 years, who were followed up at 5-year intervals for a mean of 17.8-years (n 787). A semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire estimated intakes of total, saturated, mono- and poly-unsaturated fatty acids (SFA, MUFA, PUFA). Multiple regression models investigated associations between intakes of FA at baseline with aortic pulse wave velocity (aPWV), augmentation index (AIx), systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP, DBP) and pulse pressure after a 17.8-year follow-up--as well as cross-sectional relationships with metabolic markers. After adjustment, higher SFA consumption at baseline was associated with higher SBP (P = 0.043) and DBP (P = 0.002) and after a 17.8-year follow-up was associated with a 0.51 m/s higher aPWV (P = 0.006). After adjustment, higher PUFA consumption at baseline was associated with lower SBP (P = 0.022) and DBP (P = 0.036) and after a 17.8-year follow-up was associated with a 0.63 m/s lower aPWV (P = 0.007)., Conclusion: This study suggests that consumption of SFA and PUFA have opposing effects on arterial stiffness and blood pressure. Importantly, this study suggests that consumption of FA is an important risk factor for arterial stiffness and CVD., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Circulating C-reactive protein (CRP) level is associated with cardiovascular disease. Whether this relationship is causal has been subject of debate, especially as a potential therapeutic target. Previous studies have demonstrated an association between circulating CRP levels and arterial pulse wave velocity, an accepted measure of arterial stiffness. We investigated the association between circulating CRP levels, CRP genotype, and aortic pulse wave velocity by examining data on 790 healthy male participants of the Caerphilly study. Circulating CRP levels were associated with aortic pulse wave velocity after adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors and other potential confounders (P=0.001). Three single nucleotide polymorphisms in the CRP gene (rs1130864, rs1800947, and rs1205) were associated with differences in circulating CRP levels (ratio of geometric means: 1.12, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.21, P=0.005; 0.76, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.87, P<0.001; 0.88, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.95, P=0.001, respectively). However, there was no relationship between any of the genotypes and aortic pulse wave velocity (regression coefficient for C:G/G:G versus C:C genotypes for single nucleotide polymorphism rs1800947 beta=0.005; 95% CI, -0.57 to 0.58; P=0.99). These results suggest that although circulating CRP levels are associated with aortic pulse wave velocity, CRP does not have a causal role in the development of arterial stiffness. CRP may simply act as a marker of vascular damage (ie, reverse causality), or the association reflects residual confounding. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings, particularly in view of the central role CRP has played in cardiovascular disease so far.

Brachial systolic and pulse blood pressures (BPs) are better predictors of adverse cardiovascular (CV) events than diastolic BP in individuals older than 50 years. The principal cause of increased systolic and pulse BP is increased stiffness of the elastic arteries as a result of degeneration and hyperplasia of the arterial wall. Recent studies have shown that central BP, the pressure exerted on the heart, brain, and kidneys, is a better predictor of CV risk than brachial BP. As stiffness increases, reflected wave amplitude increases and augments pressure in late systole, producing an increase in left ventricular afterload and myocardial oxygen demand. Vasoactive drugs have little direct effect on large human elastic arteries but can markedly modify wave reflection by altering stiffness of the muscular arteries and changing pulse wave velocity of the reflected wave from the periphery to the heart. Vasodilators decrease the amplitude and increase the travel time (or delay) of the reflected wave, causing a generalized decrease in systolic BP. The decrease in systolic BP brought about by this mechanism is grossly underestimated when systolic BP is measured in the brachial artery.

Background: Brachial blood pressure predicts cardiovascular outcome at rest and during exercise. However, because of pulse pressure amplification, there is a marked difference between brachial pressure and central (aortic) pressure. Although central pressure is likely to have greater clinical importance, very little data exist regarding the central haemodynamic response to exercise. The aim of the present study was to determine the central and peripheral haemodynamic response to incremental aerobic exercise., Materials and Methods: Twelve healthy men aged 31 +/- 1 years (mean +/- SEM) exercised at 50%, 60%, 70% and 80% of their maximal heart rate (HRmax) on a bicycle ergometer. Central blood pressure and estimated aortic pulse wave velocity, assessed by timing of the reflected wave (T(R)), were obtained noninvasively using pulse wave analysis. Pulse pressure amplification was defined as the ratio of peripheral to central pulse pressure and, to assess the influence of wave reflection on amplification, the ratio of peripheral pulse pressure to nonaugmented central pulse pressure (PPP : CDBP-P1) was also calculated., Results: During exercise, there was a significant, intensity-related, increase in mean arterial pressure and heart rate (P < 0.001). There was also a significant increase in pulse pressure amplification and in PPP : CDBP-P(1) (P < 0.001), but both were independent of exercise intensity. Estimated aortic pulse wave velocity increased during exercise (P < 0.001), indicating increased aortic stiffness. There was also a positive association between aortic pulse wave velocity and mean arterial pressure (r = 0.54; P < 0.001)., Conclusions: Exercise significantly increases pulse pressure amplification and estimated aortic stiffness.

Background: Individuals whose platelets are resistant to the antiaggregatory effects of insulin in vitro are also resistant to the antiaggregatory effects of nitroglycerin (GTN). We have previously shown that insulin acutely diminishes central wave reflection in large arteries and that this action of insulin is blunted in insulin-resistant subjects. However, as yet, no studies have compared the haemodynamic effects of insulin and GTN on large arterial function in the same group of subjects. The aim of this study was to determine whether resistance to the haemodynamic effects of insulin is a defect specific to insulin or whether individuals resistant to the vascular actions of insulin are also resistant to GTN., Design and Results: Dose-response characteristics of insulin and GTN on the aortic waveform were determined using applanation tonometry and pulse wave analysis (PWA) in seven healthy men (age 26 +/- 1 year, BMI 25 +/- 2 kg m(-2)). Three doses of sublingual GTN (500 microg for 1, 3 or 5 min) and insulin (0.5, 1 or 2 mU kg(-1) min(-1) for 120 min) were administered on three separate occasions. Both agents dose-dependently decreased central pulse pressure and the augmentation index (AIx) without changing brachial artery blood pressure. We next compared responses to insulin (2 mU kg(-1) min(-1) for 120 min) and sublingual GTN (500 microg for 5 min) in 20 nondiabetic subjects (age 50 +/- 2 year, BMI 21.0-36.3 kg m(-2)). Again, both agents significantly decreased AIx. Although the vascular effects of insulin and GTN vascular were positively correlated [Spearman's r=0.92 (95% confidence interval 0.81-0.97), P<0.0001], the time-course for the action GTN was faster than that of insulin. Brachial systolic blood pressure remained unchanged during the insulin infusion (122 +/- 3 vs. 121 +/- 3 mmHg, 0 vs. 120 min) but aortic systolic blood pressure decreased significantly by 30 min (111 +/- 3 vs. 107 +/- 3 mmHg, 0 vs. 30 min, P<0.01). Similarly, GTN decreased aortic systolic blood pressure from 119 +/- 4 to maximally 112 +/- 3 mmHg (P<0.001) without significantly decreasing systolic blood pressure in the brachial artery., Conclusions: The effects of insulin and GTN on large arterial haemodynamics are dose-dependent and significantly correlated. The exact mechanisms and sites of action of insulin and GTN in subjects with insulin resistance remain to be established.

Acromegaly is associated with increased cardiovascular risk. Although conventional risk factors such as glucose intolerance, hypertension, and dyslipidemia probably contribute, there may also be direct effects of GH/IGF-I excess on the vasculature. To study the effects of GH excess on the vasculature, we have assessed arterial stiffness in acromegalic subjects with and without active disease and have investigated the effects of Sandostatin LAR (OCT-LAR) on vascular function. Sixteen normotensive subjects with acromegaly (10 males and 6 females) and 8 healthy controls were studied. Of the acromegalic subjects, eight had active disease (group A), and eight were cured (GH < 2.5 mU/liter; group B). The three groups were age, sex, and blood pressure matched. Group A subjects were restudied after 3 and 6 months of OCT-LAR therapy. Arterial stiffness was assessed by analyzing central arterial pressure waveforms derived from measured radial artery waveforms. This allowed determination of the augmentation of central pressure and the augmentation index. Lipids, glucose, and IGF-I were also measured. Comparing the three groups (ANOVA; mean +/- SD), the augmentation index was higher in group A (28 +/- 12 vs. 12 +/- 13%; P < 0.01) but not in group B (22 +/- 7 vs. 12 +/- 13%; P = 0.60), compared with controls. IGF-I was higher in group A (50.3 +/- 21.2 nmol/liter; P < 0.01), compared with group B (22.5 +/- 8.9 nmol/liter) and controls (19.5 +/- 5.3 nmol/liter). On regression analysis, IGF-I concentration was identified as a strong independent predictor of the augmentation index (beta = 0.50; P = 0.007). There were no significant differences in aortic systolic pressure, aortic diastolic pressure, lipids, or glucose. Compared with baseline, OCT-LAR treatment resulted in a lowering of augmentation index at 3 months (20 +/- 15 vs. 28 +/- 12%; P < 0.05), but at 6 months (24 +/- 16%; P = 0.21) there was no significant change. IGF-I was reduced from 50.3 +/- 21.2 nmol/liter at baseline to 31.4 +/- 13.2 nmol/liter at 3 months (P < 0.05) and 26.6 +/- 15.8 nmol/liter at 6 months (P < 0.05). In conclusion, acromegaly is associated with changes in the central arterial pressure waveform, suggesting large artery stiffening. This may have important implications for cardiac morphology and performance in acromegaly as well as increasing the susceptibility to atheromatous disease. Large artery stiffness is reduced in cured acromegaly and partially reversed after pharmacological treatment of active disease.

Arterial stiffness is an important determinant of cardiovascular risk. Augmentation index (AIx) is a measure of systemic arterial stiffness derived from the ascending aortic pressure waveform. The aim of the present study was to assess the effect of heart rate on AIx. We elected to use cardiac pacing rather than chronotropic drugs to minimize confounding effects on the systemic circulation and myocardial contractility. Twenty-two subjects (13 male) with a mean age of 63 years and permanent cardiac pacemakers in situ were studied. Pulse wave analysis was used to determine central arterial pressure waveforms, non-invasively, during incremental pacing (from 60 to 110 beats min-1), from which AIx and central blood pressure were calculated. Peripheral blood pressure was recorded non-invasively from the brachial artery. There was a significant, inverse, linear relationship between AIx and heart rate (r = -0.76; P < 0.001). For a 10 beats min-1 increment, AIx fell by around 4 %. Ejection duration and heart rate were also inversely related (r = -0. 51; P < 0.001). Peripheral systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressure increased significantly during incremental pacing. Although central diastolic pressure increased significantly with pacing, central systolic pressure did not. There was a significant increase in the ratio of peripheral to central pulse pressure (P < 0.001), which was accounted for by the observed change in central pressure augmentation. These results demonstrate an inverse, linear relationship between AIx and heart rate. This is likely to be due to alterations in the timing of the reflected pressure wave, produced by changes in the absolute duration of systole. Consideration of wave reflection and aortic pressure augmentation may explain the lack of rise in central systolic pressure during incremental pacing despite an increase in peripheral pressure.

Epidemiological data suggest that insulin may have direct effects on large-vessel function, but thus far insulin has only been shown, after prolonged infusions, to slowly decrease peripheral vascular resistance by increasing muscle blood flow. We determined whether physiological doses of insulin affect function of large arteries, before any changes in peripheral blood flow, in vivo using pulse wave analysis. Nine normal men were studied on 2 occasions: once during a 6-hour infusion of saline and once under normoglycemic hyperinsulinemic conditions (sequential 2-hour insulin infusions of 1, 2, and 5 mU/kg. min). Central aortic pressure waves were synthesized from those recorded in the periphery with the use of applanation tonometry and a validated reverse transfer function every 30 minutes. This allowed determination of central aortic augmentation (the pressure difference between early and late systolic pressure peaks) and augmentation index (augmentation expressed as a percentage of pulse pressure). Both augmentation and augmentation index decreased significantly within 1 hour after administration of insulin (P<0.001) but not saline. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure and heart rate remained unchanged for the first 2 hours. A significant increase in peripheral (forearm) blood flow was not observed until 2.5 hours after start of the insulin infusion. These data demonstrate that insulin, in normal subjects, rapidly decreases wave reflection in the aorta. This beneficial effect is consistent with increased distensibility or vasodilatation of large arteries. In contrast to the effect of insulin on peripheral blood flow, this action of insulin is observed under conditions in which both the insulin dose and duration of insulin exposure are physiological. Resistance to this action of insulin could provide a mechanism linking insulin resistance and conditions such as hypertension at the level of large arteries.