Search

Endovascular repair of descending thoracic aorta (DTA) is considered as first interventional option for most part of the aortic disorders. However, many unmet needs and issues are still limiting its applicability. One of the major limitations is related to the existing gaps in evidence. Clear and robust evidence is still needed in many aspects of the management of DTA pathologies. In numerous clinical scenarios, adequate trials are lacking. Besides those gaps in evidence, it is well recognized that thoracic endografting (TEVAR) is technically evolving in order to overcome technical and device-related complications and limitations. We can deploy endografts in any aortic segment: in the descending, in the ascending, in the arch, even preserving aortic branches. Nevertheless, from the pure technical point of view, current generations of endografts still need more development and improvement. Durability remains the major concern for any endovascular treatment, and thoracic endografting is not an exception. As Galenus said, the physician is only nature's assistant, thoracic endograft should also follow the natural anatomy instead of fighting against it. We will focus the following pages on the graft conformability and compliance, both related to durability and safety of thoracic endografting. We will review the current knowledge and concerns associated with the anatomical and hemodynamic modifications induced by the thoracic endograft strength, stiffness and straightness and their implications for the future thoracic endograft designs.

Background: Aortic arch curvature can be straightened by endograft placement. However, different measurement methods with dissimilar follow-up and endografts have been published. The aim of this study was to corroborate, for the first time, the pliability of the Conformable Gore TAG Thoracic Endoprosthesis (W.L. Gore and Associates, Flagstaff, AZ, USA) into the aortic arch, using different image vector analysis., Material and Methods: We, retrospectively, analyzed patients primarily treated for thoracic aortic aneurysms and blunt traumatic aortic injuries by means of a Conformable Gore TAG Thoracic Endoprosthesis endograft proximally sealed into the aortic arch (zones Z1-Z3) in five different Spanish centers, between 2010 and 2017. The preoperative, one-month and six-month postoperative, computed tomography angiographies (CTAs) were obtained, creating accurate 3D center lumen line and external lumen line from the aortic valve to the renal arteries. Three different image analysis methods were used to compare modifications of the aortic curvature: first, segment analysis (angulations of the center lumen line when divided into seven precise segments, examining anterior-posterior, right-left, and cranial-caudal displacement), second, center lumen line analysis (bending of the center lumen line itself in seven definite points), and third, expected behavior (length of the endograft in the external lumen line). Two independent observers performed a blind analysis of all CTAs. Changes between preoperative and postoperative CTAs at one and six months are compared, and differences are viewed between cases sealed proximally (Z1-Z2) and distally (Z3) into the aortic arch., Results: We analyzed 37 cases. At 1- and 6-month follow-ups, minimal changes occurred first in segment analysis (only a slight decrease of -2.0° in the XY plane at 10 cm from the brachiocephalic trunk at six-month follow-up was seen, P = 0.027). Second, center lumen line analysis again only showed negligible aortic curvature straightening (+3.5° at 10 cm from the brachiocephalic trunk at one month, P = 0.006, disappearing at six-month follow-up). Finally, good device length predictability was shown (interclass correlation coefficients: 0.995 and 0.994 at one and six months, P > 0.001). No differences were seen between cases proximally sealed into the proximal and distal aortic arch., Conclusions: Conformable Gore TAG Thoracic Endoprosthesis thoracic endograft showed a good pliability into the aortic arch and proximal thoracic aorta, with minimal changes in the aortic curvature after endograft placement in the short-term follow-up (up to six months). In addition, final endograft length into outer aortic curvature is highly predictable., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The objective of this study was to analyze the original curvature of the aortic arch and thoracic aorta, and how it is modified after the placement of a thoracic endograft., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed all patients primarily treated for thoracic aortic aneurysms and blunt traumatic aortic injuries by means of an endograft sealed into the aortic arch (zones, Z1-Z3) in 2 different centers (Vascular Surgery Division, Hospital Clinic, UB; and Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Department, Hospital Vall d'Hebron, UAB; Barcelona, Spain), between 2010 and 2015. The last preoperative and early (1-month) postoperative computed tomography angiography (CTA) was obtained for all cases, and an accurate 3-dimensional (3D) center lumen line was created, from the aortic valve to the renal arteries. Angles in 2-dimensional (2D; XY-plane) and 3D (referred to cranial-caudal Z-axis) were analyzed in: the distal ascending aorta, aortic arch, and thoracic aorta (at 5, 10, 15, and 20 cm from the brachiocephalic trunk [BCT]) and celiac trunk (CT). Changes in preoperative-postoperative CTA were compared independently for both diseases. Thirty-six cases were included (20 aneurysms, 16 blunt traumatic injuries; mean age, 69.5 and 42.5 years)., Results: After placement of an aortic endograft (sealed in Z1-Z2 in 30% of aneurysms and 75% of traumatic injuries; mean endograft length: 22.6 cm and 11.3 cm, respectively), a global left anterior displacement of the ascending aorta was observed (2D examination: -13.1° and -7.5°, P = 0.049 and 0.041, respectively). The 3D examination showed an average increase of the aortic angle at 5 and 10 cm from the BCT in the whole sample (+4.0°, +4.9° in reference to the vertical; P = 0.017, 0.001), softening the curvature of the proximal descending thoracic aorta. In addition, in traumatic injuries, a decrease in the aortic arch angle was observed (-3.5°, P = 0.030)., Conclusions: Placement of an endograft into the aortic arch and proximal thoracic aorta engenders a softening of the proximal descending thoracic aorta curvature, increasing its angle from the vertical. In blunt traumatic aortic injuries (with shorter and more proximally sealed endografts), an additional decrease of the aortic arch angle (3.5° more vertical), was observed., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Secondary procedures for thoracic aorta are very demanding to the patient, with significantly high perioperative mortality and morbidity. The aim of this paper was to review the most remarkable secondary procedures following open and endorepairs of thoracic aorta. The PubMed database was searched without any year limits. Search terms used %were "thoracic", "aorta" and "reintervention". Two authors independently reviewed abstracts identified by the search and subsequently the reference lists of eligible series were scrutinized in order to detect any additional relevant articles. Different early and late complications following open an endovascular repair of thoracic aorta were described adding their incidence and their potential solutions with secondary interventions. Secondary interventions after open repair (OR) are more related to bleeding and progression of the aortic disease issues and open surgery is again the most common solution. However, in more fragile patients with favorable anatomy, endovascular repair can be offered as a secondary procedure. Reinterventions after endovascular treatment of thoracic aorta diseases (TEVAR) are mostly related to endoleaks and also to the aortic disease progression. Hopefully, the oncoming technological improvements together with the optimized operator expertise can reduce the incidence of secondary procedures following TEVAR for all the aortic pathologies.

Background: Successful thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) with low rates of complications has been referred to in the treatment of traumatic thoracic aortic injuries; however, we still do not know the long-term behavior. In this series, short- and intermediate-term results of TEVAR of traumatic aortic injuries are analyzed., Methods: The clinical charts and courses of 20 patients (mean age, 31.8 years; age range, 15-65 years; 14 [70%] men) with traumatic thoracic aortic injuries treated with TEVAR were retrospectively reviewed. Mean delay from trauma to intervention was 15 days (range, 0-180 days)., Results: The initial success rate was 100%, with no deaths or intraoperative leaks, although in 4 (20%) patients, injuries were repaired in the arterial access site. The mean postoperative follow-up was 43.53 months (range, 5.5-108.0 months). Four (20%) patients required reintervention: 2 postoperative revascularizations of the left subclavian artery (20% of the patients in whom the ostium was intentionally occluded) and 2 aortic reinterventions (endovascular treatment of a collapsed stent graft and open repair after thrombosis of another stent graft). All reinterventions were successfully performed and no additional complications were registered during follow-up. Asymptomatic findings related to the stent graft included lack of proximal device-wall apposition in 8 patients (40%), intragraft mural thrombus formation during the first 6 months in 7 patients (35%), and an asymptomatic fracture of the longitudinal reinforcing bar of the stent graft 4 years later in 1 patient (5%)., Conclusion: Although not completely exempt of complications, TEVAR provides a reliable method for the treatment of traumatic thoracic aortic injuries with good results in the short- and medium-term follow-up. All complications have been treated successfully. Long-term evolution of lack of proximal device-wall apposition and intragraft mural thrombus formation should be closely monitored to prevent long-term complications., (Copyright 2006 Annals of Vascular Surgery Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

We present the case of a 40-year-old man who underwent aortic endoprosthesis implantation for a traumatic lesion of the thoracic aorta (Gore TAG, 26 x 100 mm, after the instructions for use for a thoracic aorta of 22-24 mm). At 6 months, he came to the emergency room for a hypertensive crisis and acute pulmonary edema. The chest radiograph and thoracoabdominal computed tomographic angiography study showed collapse of the endoprosthesis and a type I proximal leak. A second TAG graft was inserted within the previously collapsed device, and re-expansion was achieved, with resolution of the initial symptoms. At 3 and 6 months, the patient remained asymptomatic, and there were no new findings on computed tomographic angiography.