Search

Objective: Chronic widespread pain and chronic fatigue share common associated factors but these associations may be explained by the presence of concurrent depression and anxiety., Methods: We mailed questionnaires to a randomly selected sample of people in the UK to identify participants with chronic widespread pain (ACR 1990 definition) and those with chronic fatigue. The questionnaire assessed sociodemographic factors, health status, healthcare use, childhood factors, adult attachment, and psychological stress including anxiety and depression. To identify persons with unexplained chronic widespread pain or unexplained chronic fatigue; we examined participant's medical records to exclude medical illness that might cause these symptoms., Results: Of 1443 participants (58.0% response rate) medical records of 990 were examined. 9.4% (N=93) had unexplained chronic widespread pain and 12.6% (N=125) had unexplained chronic fatigue. Marital status, childhood psychological abuse, recent threatening experiences and other somatic symptoms were commonly associated with both widespread pain and fatigue. No common effect was found for few years of education and current medical illnesses (more strongly associated with chronic widespread pain) or recent illness in a close relative, neuroticism, depression and anxiety scores (more strongly associated with chronic fatigue). Putative associated factors with a common effect were associated with unexplained chronic widespread pain or unexplained chronic fatigue only when there was concurrent anxiety and/or depression., Discussion: This study suggests that the associated factors for chronic widespread pain and chronic fatigue need to be studied in conjunction with concurrent depression/anxiety. Clinicians should be aware of the importance of concurrent anxiety or depression., (Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The role of anxiety in the use of urgent care in people with long term conditions is not fully understood. A systematic review was conducted with meta-analysis to examine the relationship between anxiety and future use of urgent healthcare among individuals with one of four long term conditions: diabetes; coronary heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma., Methods: Electronic searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, PSYCINFO, CINAHL, the British Nursing Library and the Cochrane Library were conducted These searches were supplemented by hand-searching bibliographies, citation tracing eligible studies and asking experts within the field about relevant studies. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they: a) used a standardised measure of anxiety, b) used prospective cohort design, c) included adult patients diagnosed with coronary heart disease (CHD), asthma, diabetes or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), d) assessed urgent healthcare use prospectively. Data regarding participants, methodology, and association between anxiety and urgent care use was extracted from studies eligible for inclusion. Odds ratios were calculated for each study and pooled using random effects models., Results: 8 independent studies were identified for inclusion in the meta-analysis, with a total of 28,823 individual patients. Pooled effects indicate that anxiety is not associated with an increase in the use of urgent care (OR=1.078, p=0.476), regardless of the type of service, or type of medical condition., Conclusions: Anxiety is not associated with increased use of urgent care. This finding is in contrast to similar studies which have investigated the role of depression as a risk factor for use of urgent care., (Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: The diagnosis of somatisation disorder in DSM-IV was based on 'medically unexplained' symptoms, which is unsatisfactory., Aims: To determine the value of a total somatic symptom score as a predictor of health status and healthcare use after adjustment for anxiety, depression and general medical illness., Method: Data from nine population-based studies (total n = 28 377) were analysed., Results: In all cross-sectional analyses total somatic symptom score was associated with health status and healthcare use after adjustment for confounders. In two prospective studies total somatic symptom score predicted subsequent health status. This association appeared stronger than that for medically unexplained symptoms., Conclusions: Total somatic symptom score provides a predictor of health status and healthcare use over and above the effects of anxiety, depression and general medical illnesses.

Objective: To assess whether the number of somatic symptoms and health anxiety are independent predictors of future health care use after adjusting for confounders., Methods: In a random sample of the adult UK population, questionnaires assessed the number of somatic symptoms (Somatic Symptom Inventory), health anxiety (Whiteley Index), anxiety/depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), the number of physical illnesses and demographic variables. The number of consultations in primary care was obtained from medical records for 1 year before and after questionnaire assessment, and negative binomial regression analyses identified predictors of consultation rate., Results: The sample included 961 participants (58.0% response) with complete medical record data for 609 participants. After adjustment for consultation rate in the prior year, the predictors of subsequent consultation rate in primary care were the number of physical illnesses, off work through illness, Whiteley Index (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 1.22, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.09-1.35), and the Whiteley Index-by-Somatic Symptom Inventory interaction term. Reported physical abuse predicted an increased consultation rate in women (IRR = 2.30, 95% CI = 1.08-4.90) but a reduced rate in men (IRR = 0.43, 95% CI = 0.22-0.84), interaction p = 0.003., Conclusions: These data raise the possibility that both increased health anxiety and number of bothersome somatic symptoms predict frequent medical consultations. A more complex model of predicting future health care use is needed than has been studied previously, which is potentially relevant to the current discussions of the proposed DSM-V and International Classification of Diseases, 11th Revision, diagnostic guidelines regarding complex somatic symptom disorders.

Purpose: To test the relative importance of anxiety, depression and somatization as correlates of physical health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in several chronic physical disorders., Methods: In a cross-sectional study of patients with colorectal cancer (N = 162), glaucoma (N = 100), rheumatoid arthritis (N = 168), systemic sclerosis (N = 56) and systemic lupus erythematosus (N = 56), we assessed specific disease severity and used the Symptom Distress Checklist (SCL-90) for psychologic dimensions. Outcome was assessed with the WHO Quality of Life Instrument, Short Form using hierarchical regression to determine independent correlates of HRQOL., Results: After adjustment for demographic features, stage of cancer and pain (final models), the SCL-90 somatization score was the only psychologic distress covariate significantly correlated to physical HRQOL in all diseases (Betas between -0.33 and -0.49) except in systemic sclerosis and scleroderma, where depression was also a correlate. In glaucoma patients, the SCL-90 somatization score was the only significant covariate for physical HRQOL in the final model., Conclusions: Since reported number of bodily symptoms is both associated with physical HRQOL and treatable in its own right, our findings suggest a possible new avenue to improve the HRQOL in patients with chronic physical disease. Whether this offers greater benefit than treatments for anxiety and depression needs further research.

Background: We tested whether a brief psychological intervention could prevent anxiety or depressive disorders among newly diagnosed cancer patients., Patients and Methods: Patients free of anxiety or depressive disorder were randomised to receive immediate intervention (start of cancer treatment), delayed intervention (8 weeks after starting treatment) or usual care. They were stratified according to risk of developing anxiety or depressive disorders. Primary outcome was measured using a standardised psychiatric interview to detect any anxiety or depressive disorder at 6 and 12 months following the cancer diagnosis. Analyses used conditional odds logistic regression models adjusting for age, gender, concerns and past history to compare outcome of all intervention patients with usual care., Results: A total of 465 patients were recruited. In all, 313 (79%) of the 397 well enough to be interviewed completed the study. At 12 months, there was no difference between the groups receiving the intervention and usual care [odds ratio (OR) = 0.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.41-1.17, P = 0.17]. In high-risk patients, those who received the intervention were less likely to develop an anxiety or depressive disorder compared with those who received usual care (OR = 0.54, 95% CI 0.29-1.00, P = 0.050). In low-risk patients, there was no difference (OR = 1.50, 95% CI 0.51-4.43, P = 0.47)., Conclusion: A brief intervention, delivered by nonspecialists, promoted adjustment among newly diagnosed cancer patients at high risk of developing anxiety or depressive disorders.

Background: In consecutive new outpatients, we aimed to assess whether somatization and health anxiety predicted health care use and quality of life 6 months later in all patients or in those without demonstrable abnormalities., Method: On the first clinic visit, participants completed the Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ), the Health Anxiety Questionnaire (HAQ), and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Outcome was assessed as: (a) the number of medical consultations over the subsequent 6 months, extracted from medical records, and (b) Short-Form Health Survey 36 (SF36) physical component score 6 months after index clinic visit., Results: A total of 295 patients were recruited (77% response rate), and medical consultation data were available for 275. The number of bodily symptoms was associated with both outcomes in linear fashion (P<.001), and this was independent of anxiety and depression. Similar associations were found in people with or without symptoms due to demonstrable structural abnormalities. Health anxiety was associated only with health-related quality of life in patients with symptoms explained by demonstrable abnormalities., Conclusion: The number of bodily symptoms and degree of health anxiety have different patterns of association with outcome, and these need to be considered in revising the diagnoses of somatization and hypochondriasis.

Background: Although it is recognized that anxiety and depression are associated with frequent attendance in primary care, not all patients with these disorders attend frequently. The factors associated with general practice consultation in the important group of patients with anxiety and depressive disorders are not clear., Objectives: Our aim was to determine prospectively the factors which predict consultation rate in a cohort of patients with anxiety and depressive disorders in primary care., Methods: A total of 148 adult patients with a depressive, anxiety or panic disorder (DSM-III criteria) were studied prospectively for 6 months to determine the factors which predicted consultation rate during this time. Measures at baseline included: the Psychiatric Assessment Schedule, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, Life Events and Difficulties Schedule, Clinical Anxiety Scale, details of substance misuse and demographic data. The principal outcome measure was the number of consultations recorded in the GP records over the following 6 months. The variables associated with consultation rate were assessed by multiple regression analysis, with number of consultations as the dependent variable., Results: The median consultation rate during the 6 months of the study was five (range: 1-22). Thirty per cent of the sample consulted seven or more times during the 6 months and 10% consulted 12 or more times. The regression analysis demonstrated that the following variables contributed to the best model: prior consultation rate, past psychiatric history, ongoing social difficulties, current level of alcohol consumption, total psychiatric symptom score and total anxiety score. These variables together accounted for 41% of the variance in consultation rate., Conclusion: The detection and rigorous treatment of psychiatric disorder, the provision of social support and interventions for alcohol dependence may help to reduce the frequency of consultation of anxious and depressed patients in primary care. Future research to identify additional variables which explain the major part of the variance in consultation rate may pave the way for novel treatment approaches to the phenomenon of frequent attendance.

Background: Factors related to the outcome of depression and anxiety in primary care are not fully understood., Method: Adult patients in general practice with depressive, anxiety or panic disorder (n = 148; DSM-III-R criteria) were studied prospectively for six months to determine the factors most closely associated with outcome. The Psychiatric Assessment Schedule, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, Clinical Anxiety Scale and Life Events and Difficulties Schedule interviews were performed at index consultations and repeated six months later. Variables associated with outcome were assessed by multiple regression analysis., Results: Good outcome was predicted by mild depression at initial assessment, high educational level, and being in employment. At follow-up the most important predictor of improvement was reduction in marked difficulties over the six months. Recognition and management by the GP was most frequent in patients with severe disorder; such patients were least likely to improve because of the severity of their depression and marked social difficulties., Conclusions: This naturalistic study helps to provide a framework for further studies with more precisely defined groups of people with depression. An effective treatment strategy for people with marked depression and ongoing social difficulties is especially needed.

A Blakemore,1 C Dickens,2 CA Chew-Graham,3 CW Afzal,4 B Tomenson,5 PA Coventry,6 E Guthrie71Division of Nursing, Social Work and Midwifery, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK; 2University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, St Luke’s Campus, Exeter, UK; 3Research Institute, Primary Care and Health Sciences, West Midlands CLAHRC, Keele, University, Newcastle, UK; 4Health Innovation Manchester, Greater Manchester’s Academic Health Science Network, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK; 5Centre for Biostatistics, Institute of Population Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; 6Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK; 7Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UKBackground: Depression is common in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and has been associated with a variety of poor outcomes. A large proportion of health care costs in the UK are spent on emergency care. This study examined the prospective relationship between depression and use of emergency care in patients with COPD managed in primary care.Methods: This was a twelve-month, prospective longitudinal study of 355 patients with COPD in six primary care practices in the UK. Baseline measures included demographic characteristics, depression and anxiety, severity of COPD, presence or absence of other chronic diseases, and prior use of emergency care. Outcome measures were (a) number of emergency department (ED) visits; or (b) an emergency hospital admission in the follow-up year.Results: Older age, number of comorbid physical health conditions, severity of COPD, prior use of emergency care, and depression were all independently associated with both ED attendance and an emergency hospital admission in the follow-up year. Subthreshold depression (HADS depression score 4–7) was associated with a 2.8 times increased odds of emergency hospital admission, and HADS depression >8 was associated with 4.8 times increased odds.Conclusion: Depression is a predictor of emergency care in COPD, independent of severity of disease or physical comorbidity. Even mild (subthreshold) symptoms of depression more than double the risk of using emergency care, suggesting there is a strong case to develop and deploy integrated preventive strategies in primary care that can promote mental health in people with COPD.Keywords: COPD, depression, anxiety, emergency care, United Kingdom, hospital admission, primary care

Background: The extent to which depression impairs health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in the physically ill has not been clearly established.Aims: To quantify the adverse influence of depression and anxiety, assessed at the time of first myocardial infarction and 6 months later, on the physical aspect of HRQoL 12 months after the infarction.Method: In all, 260 in-patients, admitted following first myocardial infarction, completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the Medical Outcomes Study SF-36 assessment before discharge and at 6- and 12-month follow-up.Results: Depression and anxiety 6 months after myocardial infarction predicted subsequent impairment in the physical aspects of HRQoL (attributable adjusted R(2)=9%, P<0.0005). These negative effects of depression and anxiety on outcome were mediated by feelings of fatigue. Depression and anxiety present before myocardial infarction did not predict HRQoL 12 months after myocardial infarction.Conclusions: Detection and treatment of depression and anxiety following myocardial infarction improve the patient's health-related quality of life. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]