Search

Abstract: Male Syrian hamsters are naturally aggressive animals that reliably defend their home territory against intruding conspecifics. Hamsters that lose agonistic encounters subsequently exhibit a striking change in their agonistic behavior, however, expressing no aggression and instead becoming highly submissive, a behavioral change that we have termed conditioned defeat. We have generally employed an inescapable defeat training protocol when studying conditioned defeat. The purpose of the present study was to determine if conditioned defeat is an epiphenomenon of the inescapable defeat experience by comparing the behavior of hamsters exposed to inescapable versus escapable defeat. In the conditioned defeat model, defeated hamsters subsequently generalize their submission and social avoidance to a novel, non-aggressive opponent, suggesting that hamsters subjected to inescapable defeat may not form a specific memory of their aggressive opponent. Thus, a secondary purpose of the present study was to determine whether hamsters subjected to our defeat protocol have the ability to recognize a familiar opponent following defeat. Our results provide evidence that conditioned defeat is not solely a by-product of inescapable defeat because all experimental animals, regardless of the type of defeat, expressed conditioned defeat during testing. We also found that animals experiencing an inescapable defeat avoided a familiar aggressor significantly more than they did an unfamiliar aggressor, demonstrating that these animals have the ability to recognize their previous attacker. Thus, we maintain that a variety of social defeat models, and conditioned defeat in particular, represent generalizable and ethologically valid models with which to study the effects of social stress on physiology and behavior. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Several neuroendocrine signals of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis are released following exposure to stressful events. It has long been proposed that the signals in this cascade each act to modify ongoing and future behavior. In this study we investigated whether blocking glucocorticoid synthesis, corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF)-1 receptors, or CRF-2 receptors during social defeat would alter subsequent behavioral responses. We used a conditioned defeat model in Syrian hamsters in which social defeat results in a dramatic shift from territorial aggression to increased submissive and defensive behavior in future social encounters. We found that intracerebroventricular administration of anti-sauvagine-30, a CRF-2 receptor antagonist, prior to social defeat training reduced the acquisition of conditioned defeat. In contrast, the acquisition of conditioned defeat was not altered by the CRF-1 receptor antagonist CP-154,526 or the glucocorticoid synthesis inhibitor metyrapone. Our results suggest that CRF, and perhaps related neuropeptides such as urocortins, act at CRF-2 receptors to promote the development of defeat-induced changes in social behavior, whereas signaling at CRF-1 and glucocorticoid receptors plays a negligible role in this process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In Syrian hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus), social defeat produces a subsequent increase in submissive and defensive behavior and a loss of normal territorial aggression, which the authors have called conditioned defeat. In this study, the authors investigated the effect of blocking corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) Type I and Type II receptors on conditioned defeat. Intracerebroventricular infusion of the CRF2 receptor antagonist antisauvagine-30 prior to testing significantly reduced conditioned defeat compared with vehicle controls, whereas the CRF1 receptor antagonist CP-154,526 had no effect. Also, infusion of antisauvagine-30 into the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST) 15 min, but not immediately, prior to testing reduced conditioned defeat in a dose-dependent manner. The authors' results provide evidence that CRF2 receptors in the BNST, but not CRF1 receptors, are an important component in the neural circuitry regulating conditioned defeat. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: When Syrian hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus) are defeated by a larger, more aggressive opponent, they subsequently produce more defensive and submissive behaviors and less chemosensory investigation and aggression, even when they are paired with a smaller, non-aggressive intruder. This persistent change in the behavior of defeated animals has been termed conditioned defeat. In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST) is important for the acquisition and expression of conditioned defeat. We found that the GABAA receptor agonist muscimol infused into the BNST immediately prior to initial defeat training failed to disrupt the acquisition of conditioned defeat, while muscimol infused prior to testing caused a significant reduction in submissive/defensive behaviors and an increase in investigatory behaviors of the non-aggressive intruder. These results indicate that (1) the BNST, unlike the amygdala, does not appear to be critically involved in the consolidation process related to the memory of social defeat and (2) the BNST may be an important site for the execution of fear behaviors associated with social defeat. Considering the high degree of connectivity between the BNST and the amygdala, these findings provide further insight into the neural circuitry governing conditioned defeat and support the view of a functional dissociation between the amygdala and the BNST in the modulation of conditioned fear in an ethologically relevant model. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Summary: In animal models, serotonin (5-HT) activity contributes to stress-induced changes in behavior. Syrian hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus) exhibit a stress-induced change in behavior in which social defeat results in increased submissive and defensive behavior and a complete loss of normal territorial aggression directed toward a novel, non-aggressive opponent. We refer to this defeat-induced change in agonistic behavior as conditioned defeat. In this study we tested the hypothesis that 5-HT activity in the dorsal raphe nucleus (DRN) contributes to the acquisition and expression of conditioned defeat. We investigated whether injection of the selective 5-HT1A agonist flesinoxan (200ng, 400ng, or 800ng in 200nl saline) into the DRN would reduce the acquisition and expression of conditioned defeat. Additionally, we investigated whether injection of the selective 5-HT1A antagonist WAY 100635 (400ng in 200nl saline) into the DRN would enhance the acquisition and expression of conditioned defeat following a sub-optimal social defeat experience. We found that injection of flesinoxan into the DRN before exposure to a 15-min social defeat reduced the amount of submissive and defensive behavior shown at testing. We also found that injection of flesinoxan into the DRN before testing similarly reduced submissive and defensive behavior. In addition, we found that WAY 100635 enhanced conditioned defeat when injected either before social defeat or before testing. These data support the hypothesis that the activity of 5-HT cells in the DRN, as regulated by 5-HT1A autoreceptors, contributes to the formation and display of conditioned defeat. Further, our results suggest that 5-HT release in DRN projection regions augments defeat-induced changes in social behavior. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: We have reported that there is a sex difference in the behavioral response to social defeat in hamsters. While previously defeated male hamsters fail to display normal territorial aggression and instead produce submissive/defensive behavior, a phenomenon that we have termed conditioned defeat (CD), only a small portion of previously defeated females exhibit CD. In Experiment 1, we tested the hypothesis that CD varies over the estrous cycle and found that previously defeated female hamsters tested on diestrus 2 and proestrus were more likely to exhibit CD than were females tested on diestrus 1 and estrus. In Experiment 2, we found that regardless of hormonal status, non-defeated females displayed normal territorial aggression, indicating that the behavioral changes observed in Experiment 1 were not due to a cyclic variation in submissive behavior independent of a previous defeat encounter. In Experiment 3, we found that females tested 4 days after defeat responded similarly to those tested 1 day after defeat suggesting that the hormonal status of females on the day of testing is a more important determinant of the behavioral response to defeat than is the hormonal status on the day of defeat training. Finally, in Experiment 4, we monitored anxiety-like behaviors in diestrous 1 and proestrous females in an open field arena and found that there was no effect of cycle on any of the observed behavioral measures, suggesting that the observed differences in CD are not the result of differences in generalized anxiety-like behaviors across the estrous cycle. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Reversible inactivation of the basolateral amygdala (BLA) disrupts the acquisition and expression of conditioned defeat (CD), an ethological model of conditioned fear, suggesting that the BLA may be a critical component of the neural circuit mediating behavioral plasticity associated with the experience of social defeat. We have also shown that this effect is N-methyl-d-aspartic acid (NMDA) receptor-dependent, because infusion of d,l-2-amino-5-phosphovalerate (APV) into the BLA also impairs the acquisition of CD. APV is a non-selective NMDA antagonist, however, thus it disrupts the entire heteromeric receptor complex, making it difficult to distinguish the relative contributions of either the NR2A or NR2B receptor subtypes on the acquisition of CD. There is ample evidence, however, that the NR2B subunit of the NMDA receptor in the amygdala is critical for mediating long-term potentiation and plasticity related to fear learning. The purpose of the present experiment was to determine whether infusion of ifenprodil, a selective antagonist of the NR2B subunit, into the BLA would block the acquisition (but not expression) of CD. In Experiment 1, infusion of ifenprodil immediately before defeat training significantly decreased submissive behaviors and restored territorial aggression when hamsters were later paired with a non-aggressive intruder (NAI). Conversely, infusion of ifenprodil immediately before CD testing failed to inhibit the expression of submissive behaviors in previously defeated hamsters. These results support the hypothesis that the BLA is a critical site for the plasticity underlying social defeat-induced changes in behavior. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: It has been widely reported that gonadal hormones influence the display of aggression in Syrian hamsters; conversely, much less is known about whether gonadal hormones modulate submissive/defensive behaviors in these animals. Following social defeat, male hamsters no longer display normal territorial aggression but instead display submissive/defensive behavior in the presence of a smaller opponent, a phenomenon we have termed conditioned defeat (CD). The purpose of the present study was to examine the effect of gonadal hormones on the display of CD in male hamsters. In Experiment 1, males were castrated or sham-operated. The castrated males were significantly more submissive following social defeat relative to their intact counterparts. The increased submissive behavior in the castrated males during CD testing was particularly surprising, given the fact that they were attacked significantly less during CD training. In Experiment 2a, males were castrated and given hormone replacement. Castrated males treated with testosterone or dihydrotestosterone displayed significantly less submissive behavior following social defeat than did those treated with cholesterol or estradiol. Finally, in Experiment 2b, there was no effect of hormone replacement on aggressive behavior in non-defeated hamsters suggesting that the decrease in submissive behavior in males treated with dihydrotestosterone or testosterone is specific to being previously defeated. Taken together the data indicate that the presence of androgens reduces the display of submission in defeated male hamsters. More importantly, these findings suggest that androgens may have a protective effect against the development of depression-like or anxiety-like behaviors following exposure to an ethologically relevant stressor. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

The cAMP-responsive element binding protein (CREB) is a transcription factor that regulates synaptic plasticity and memory formation. Studies that have used conditioned fear models have established that CREB is important for the acquisition and consolidation of fear learning. The authors demonstrate that overexpression of CREB within the basolateral amygdala (BLA) of animals that are exposed to social defeat enhances subsequent defeat-induced changes in social behavior. This effect is specific to the acquisition of defeat-induced behaviors; overexpression of CREB has no effect on the expression of these behaviors if the overexpression occurs after the initial defeat. These data demonstrate that CREB is important for regulating learning not only to explicit cues but also for mediating behavioral plasticity in ethologically relevant social contexts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]