Search

One of the drugs that has been suggested for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection is tenofovir disoproxil (TDF). Herein, it was aimed to evaluate the outcomes of TDF receiving COVID-19 cases in terms of day 7-10 PCR negativity and day 30 survival. Patients who received TDF due to PCR-confirmed COVID-19 between 27.04.2021 and 31.12.2021 were included in our study. The primary outcome was considered to be 7-10 days of PCR negativity, while the secondary outcome was considered 30-day survival after diagnosis of COVID-19. Patients who died before completing the treatment period (7-10 days) were also considered as PCR failures. Data were analyzed both in terms of intention to treat basis and in the subgroup that survived to the end of treatment. A total of 78 patients (30 women, mean age: 61.15±18.5 years) met the inclusion criteria. In the intention to treat analysis group, one-month-mortality was 44.87% (35/78) in the overall cohort. In the end of treatment analysis group, one-month-mortality was 29.5% (18/61) in the overall cohort. Day 7-10 PCR negativity was detected in 55.7% of the overall EOT cohort. Our data suggest that TDF may be an alternative salvage treatment option in antiviral unresponsive patients. We suggest evaluating TDF in well-designed controlled trials involving treatment-naïve cases.

Background/aims: Ledipasvir (LDV) and sofosbuvir (SOF) as single-tablet regimen (STR) has been approved for treatment of chronic HCV infection (CHC) for treatment-naïve or experienced cirrhotic or non-cirrhotic patients. Our aim was to analyse the effectiveness and safety of 12-24 weeks treatment of LDV/SOF (90mg/400 mg)±ribavirin in a real-life setting in Turkey., Materials and Methods: Between May-Dec 2016, 104 treatment-naïve or experienced adult patients with CHC and with or without cirrhosis (including decompensated cirrhosis) were included in this observational study. Patients were administered LDV/SOF STR± ribavirin once daily for 12 -24 weeks. SVR12 rates and effects of the baseline characteristics on SVR12 rates were assessed., Results: Out of 104 enrolled patients (61.5% female, mean age 62.0 years); 60.6% were cirrhotic, 76.0% previously used peg-IFN, 94.2% had GT1. At the end of the treatment, 77.8% (77/99, no data for 21 patients) had undetectable HCV-RNA and 98.9% (94/95) had SVR12. In the baseline characteristics subgroups, the SVR12 rates varied between 94.4% and 100%, and none of the baseline characteristics had a significant effect on the SVR12 rates. During the study, 6 (5.8%) patients died and none of the deaths was suspected to be related to the LDV/SOF. No treatment-emergent adverse event was reported., Conclusion: In conclusion, LDV/SOF±ribavirin yielded very high SVR12 rates, without any safety or tolerability concern in Turkey. The effectiveness of the LDV/SOF treatment was not affected by the patient demographics or medical characteristics such as fibrosis level, cirrhosis status, previous treatment status, HCV-RNA level or HCV genotype.

In this study, we aimed to evaluate the 1-year post-treatment follow-up results of 112 patients who received pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) for 52 weeks. HBeAg negativity/seroconversion and/or negative HBV-DNA at the end of the treatment were considered as response. Patients who had response at the end of treatment but had HBV-DNA breakthrough during 1-year follow-up were considered as relapse. The study group comprised 112 cases (34 HBeAg-positive, 78 HBeAg-negative). In HBeAg-positive and -negative cases, end-of-treatment response rates were 2·9% and 60·2%, whereas 1-year sustained virological response rates were 0 and 33·3%, respectively. When we compared relapse cases versus cases with response at the end of 1-year follow-up, being female and having low viral load were the two parameters associated with higher response rates (Chi-square, P  =  0·028; Mann-Whitney U test, P  =  0·023). Overall non-response rates to PEG-IFN were high (57·1%). Results in HBeAg-positive cases were disappointing.

Implementation of antiviral therapy leads to the emergence of mutant strains during the treatment in chronic hepatitis B. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) with primary antiviral resistance may be rarely encountered. In this report, a chronic hepatitis B case who had never received adefovir dipivoxil but had primary adefovir resistance, was presented. HBeAg positive 25-year-old male patient was treated with interferon (IFN)-alpha (thrice a week 10 MU) and lamivudine (100 mg/daily) combination for one year. At the end of this treatment although HBV-DNA was under the detectable limit and ALT levels returned to normal, anti-HBe antibodies did not develop. During the course of lamivudin treatment on the third year virus was found to be resistant to lamivudin [FLM+YMDD+YIDD+YVDD (Inno-LiPA HBV DR, Innogenetics Ghent, Belgium)] and adefovir was added to the lamivudin therapy. At the end of eight months of combination therapy, ALT levels did not return to normal and HBV-DNA was still in detectable levels. On the 11th month resistance to adefovir was analysed and rtA181T mutation was found by DNA sequence analysis (Big Dye Terminator Cycle Sequencing kit, Applied Biosystems, USA). Since there had been no response to adefovir from the initiation of the therapy, primary adefovir resistance was suspected. Primary adefovir resistance was confirmed by the detection of the same mutation in pre-adefovir treatment serum sample of the patient. Lamivudin was re-added to the therapy, however, HBV-DNA still remained positive on the third month of this combination therapy. The patient got out of routine follow-up after this period.