Search

Despite the high effectiveness of direct-acting antivirals for the treatment of hepatitis C, a small proportion of patients do not respond to approved regimens. The combination regimen of SOF/VEL/VOX was recently approved for patients with failure to prior NS5A-based treatment. In this German real-world cohort including patients with cirrhosis (27.3 %) and previous decompensation events, 12 weeks of SOF/VEL/VOX resulted in high virologic response rates irrespective of disease severity and prior DAA regimen. Adverse events were mostly mild or moderate and comparable to those seen in the approval studies., Competing Interests: Johannes Vermehren: sponsored lectures (national oriInternational): AbbVie, Gilead, Intercept, Merck. Markus Cornberg: sponsored lectures (national or international): AbbVie, Gilead, Merck/MSD, Siemens Healthcare, Falk Foundation e. V.; other: advisory committee or review panel: Merck/MSD, AbbVie, Spring. Albrecht Stoehr: grants: Abbvie, Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Gilead, Janssen, MSD, ViiV; sponsored lectures (national or international): AbbVie, Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Gilead, Janssen, MSD, ViiV; other: advisory boards: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Gilead, Janssen, MSD, ViiV. Hartwig Klinker: grants: Abbvie, BMS, Gilead, Janssen, MSD; sponsored lectures (national or international): AbbVie, BMS, Gilead, Janssen, MSD; other: advisory boards: AbbVie, BMS, Gilead, Hexal, Janssen, MSD. Karl-Georg Simon: sponsored lectures (national or international): AbbVie, FALK, Gilead, MSD; other: advisory committee or review panel: AbbVie, MSD. Gerlinde Teuber: sponsored lectures (national or international): AbbVie, Gilead Sciences, Intercept, MSD; other: advisory committee or review panel: AbbVie, Gilead. Katja Deterding: sponsored lectures (national or international): AbbVie, Gilead, Merck/MSD; other: advisory committee: Gilead, AbbVie. Julian Schulze zur Wiesch: sponsored lectures: Gilead, MSD, AbbVie. Maria-Christina Jung: nothing to disclose. Yvonne Serfert: nothing to disclose. Michael P. Manns: grants: AbbVie, BMS, Janssen, Gilead, Merck (MSD); sponsored lectures (national or international): AbbVie, BMS, Janssen, Gilead, Merck (MSD); consultant: AbbVie, BMS, Janssen, Gilead, Merck (MSD). Stefan Zeuzem: consultancies and lecture honoria: AbbVie, Gilead, Intercept, Janssen, Merck/MSD. Heiner Wedemeyer: reports personal fees from Transgene, MSD, Roche, Gilead, Abbott, BMS, Falk, AbbVie, Novartis, GSK, Roche Diagnostics, Eiger, ITF, and MyrGmbH; grants/research support from MSD, Novartis, Gilead, Roche, Abbott, and Roche Diagnostics. Christoph Sarrazin: grants: Abbott, Gilead, Janssen, Qiagen, Roche, Siemens; sponsored lectures (national or international): Abbott, AbbVie, Achillion, BMS, Gilead, Janssen, Merck/MSD, Qiagen, Roche, Siemens; other: advisory boards: Abbott, AbbVie, BMS, Gilead, Janssen, Merck/MSD, Roche., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Background: Glecaprevir/pibrentasvir is a pangenotypic direct-acting antiviral regimen approved for treating adults chronically infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV). There are limited real-world data on glecaprevir/pibrentasvir to date., Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir under real-world conditions in the German Hepatitis C-Registry (DHC-R)., Methods: The DHC-R is an ongoing, non-interventional, multicentre, prospective, observational cohort study that monitors patients with chronic HCV infection. Data were collected from patients who initiated glecaprevir/pibrentasvir and completed a screening visit on or after 2 August 2017. The primary effectiveness endpoint was sustained virological response at post-treatment Week 12 (SVR12). Safety and tolerability were also assessed., Results: As of 15 July 2018, 586 patients received glecaprevir/pibrentasvir and had documented SVR12 data, treatment discontinuation, loss to follow-up or HCV reinfection. Five hundred and fifty-two patients (94%) received on-label treatment. At baseline, most on-label patients were infected with HCV genotype 1 (53%) or 3 (33%), HCV treatment-naïve (90%), without cirrhosis (94%), and treated for 8 weeks (93%). Five hundred and thirty-four patients (96.7%) achieved SVR12 (intention-to-treat [ITT] analysis). By modified ITT analysis (excluding patients who discontinued and did not achieve SVR12 or patients lost to follow-up), the SVR12 rate was 99.4% (n/N = 534/537). There was one documented virological failure (relapse) and two documented HCV reinfections. One hundred and forty-two (26%) adverse events (AEs) and 9 (2%) serious AEs occurred; 2 (<1%) AEs led to treatment discontinuation. All patients treated off-label (N = 34) achieved SVR12., Conclusion: Glecaprevir/pibrentasvir was highly effective and well tolerated under real-world conditions. Clinical trial number: DRKS00009717 (German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS)., (© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Viral hepatitis is major a public health problem affecting millions of people worldwide. Estimates assume 400 000-500 000 people chronically infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) in Germany. Long-term consequences are the development of liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. The aim of the study was to assess the costs for treating patients with chronic HCV in Germany., Methods: We conducted a retrospective multicenter observational study. The design was approved by an ethics committee, and patients were asked for their informed consent. Patients were grouped in four different health states. Healthcare utilization data were extracted from doctor files of six medical centers in Germany., Results: Data of 315 patients with chronic HCV were analyzed. The mean age was 49.4 years, 57.5% were male and 67.9% had a genotype 1 infection. The most common routes of transmission were injection drug use (39.0%) and infection through blood products (15.9%). The average total cost was €19 147 including ambulatory care and diagnostics (€1686), pharmaceuticals (€14 875), inpatient care (€1293), and sick leave (€1293). For patients in stable health states (mild and moderate HCV, compensated cirrhosis), costs did not differ significantly and were mainly influenced by antiviral treatment. For patients with decompensated cirrhosis, inpatient care accounted for the largest part of the costs., Conclusion: Treatment of HCV patients involves high costs, mainly associated with the length of antiviral therapy. Viral eradication can prevent severe disease stages, which are associated with high costs. It is necessary to follow current guidelines and monitor patients closely to avoid unnecessary costs.

Evidence based clinical guidelines are implemented to treat patients efficiently that include efficacy, tolerability but also health economic considerations. This is of particular relevance to the new direct acting antiviral agents that have revolutionized treatment of chronic hepatitis C. For hepatitis C genotypes 2/3 interferon free treatment is already available with sofosbuvir plus ribavirin. However, treatment with sofosbuvir-based regimens is 10-20 times more expensive compared to pegylated interferon alfa and ribavirin (PegIFN/RBV). It has to be discussed if PegIFN/RBV is still an option for easy to treat patients. We assessed the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C genotypes 2/3 with PegIFN/RBV in a real world setting according to the latest German guidelines. Overall, 1006 patients were recruited into a prospective patient registry with 959 having started treatment. The intention-to-treat analysis showed poor SVR (GT2 61%, GT3 47%) while patients with adherence had excellent SVR in the per protocol analysis (GT2 96%, GT3 90%). According to guidelines, 283 patients were candidates for shorter treatment duration, namely a treatment of 16 weeks (baseline HCV-RNA <800.000 IU/mL, no cirrhosis and RVR). However, 65% of these easy to treat patients have been treated longer than recommended that resulted in higher costs but not higher SVR rates. In conclusion, treatment with PegIFN/RBV in a real world setting can be highly effective yet similar effective than PegIFN± sofosbuvir/RBV in well-selected naïve G2/3 patients. Full adherence to guidelines could be further improved, because it would be important in the new era with DAA, especially to safe resources.

Background: Different parameters have been determined for prediction of treatment outcome in hepatitis c virus genotype 1 infected patients undergoing pegylated interferon, ribavirin combination therapy. Results on the importance of vitamin D levels are conflicting. In the present study, a comprehensive analysis of vitamin D levels before and during therapy together with single nucleotide polymorphisms involved in vitamin D metabolism in the context of other known treatment predictors has been performed., Methods: In a well characterized prospective cohort of 398 genotype 1 infected patients treated with pegylated interferon-α and ribavirin for 24-72 weeks (INDIV-2 study) 25-OH-vitamin D levels and different single nucleotide polymorphisms were analyzed together with known biochemical parameters for a correlation with virologic treatment outcome., Results: Fluctuations of more than 5 (10) ng/ml in 25-OH-vitamin D-levels have been observed in 66 (39) % of patients during the course of antiviral therapy and neither pretreatment nor under treatment 25-OH-vitamin D-levels were associated with treatment outcome. The DHCR7-TT-polymorphism within the 7-dehydrocholesterol-reductase showed a significant association (P = 0.031) to sustained viral response in univariate analysis. Among numerous further parameters analyzed we found that age (OR = 1.028, CI = 1.002-1.056, P = 0.035), cholesterol (OR = 0.983, CI = 0.975-0.991, P<0.001), ferritin (OR = 1.002, CI = 1.000-1.004, P = 0.033), gGT (OR = 1.467, CI = 1.073-2.006, P = 0.016) and IL28B-genotype (OR = 2.442, CI = 1.271-4.695, P = 0.007) constituted the strongest predictors of treatment response., Conclusions: While 25-OH-vitamin D-levels levels show considerable variations during the long-lasting course of antiviral therapy they do not show any significant association to treatment outcome in genotype 1 infected patients.

Goals: To evaluate the predictive value of complete early virological response (cEVR) on sustained virological response (SVR) following retreatment with peginterferon alpha-2a (40 kDa) plus ribavirin in previous nonresponders to peginterferon alpha-2b (12 kDa)., Background: In the randomized multinational retreatment with Pegasys in patients not responding to PegIntron therapy study, a 72-week regimen of peginterferon alpha-2a (40 kDa) plus ribavirin improved SVR rates over a standard 48-week regimen in previous nonresponders to peginterferon alpha-2b (12 kDa). cEVR, defined as hepatitis C virus RNA <50 IU/mL at treatment week 12, was an important predictor of SVR., Study: We conducted an exploratory analysis of the retreatment with Pegasys in patients not responding to PegIntron therapy study data to better define the predictive value of cEVR for SVR in this patient population., Results: In total, 157 of the 942 patients achieved a cEVR (16.7%). SVR rates were higher with 72 versus 48 weeks of retreatment in patients with a cEVR (57% vs. 35%), whereas SVR rates were <5% in patients without cEVR in both groups. The relative adverse event (AE) burden was lower with 72 weeks of treatment (8.1 vs. 10.1 AEs/y of treatment) as was the estimated number of AEs per SVR achieved (55 vs. 100). Cumulative treatment duration required to achieve 1 SVR was lower with 72 weeks of treatment (6.7 vs. 10.0 y/SVR) and lower still assuming that treatment was stopped at week 12 for non-cEVR patients (3.6 vs. 7.1 y/SVR)., Conclusions: cEVR is a reliable predictor of SVR in patients retreated with peginterferon alpha-2a (40 kDa) plus ribavirin. Seventy-two-week retreatment has a more favorable benefit-risk ratio than 48 weeks, especially when cEVR is used to identify patients most likely to be cured.

Background and Aims: In patients with advanced liver cirrhosis due to chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection antiviral therapy with peginterferon and ribavirin is feasible in selected cases only due to potentially life-threatening side effects. However, predictive factors associated with hepatic decompensation during antiviral therapy are poorly defined., Methods: In a retrospective cohort study, 68 patients with HCV-associated liver cirrhosis (mean MELD score 9.18 ± 2.72) were treated with peginterferon and ribavirin. Clinical events indicating hepatic decompensation (onset of ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, upper gastrointestinal bleeding, hospitalization) as well as laboratory data were recorded at baseline and during a follow up period of 72 weeks after initiation of antiviral therapy. To monitor long term sequelae of end stage liver disease an extended follow up for HCC development, transplantation and death was applied (240 weeks, ± SD 136 weeks)., Results: Eighteen patients (26.5%) achieved a sustained virologic response. During the observational period a hepatic decompensation was observed in 36.8%. Patients with hepatic decompensation had higher MELD scores (10.84 vs. 8.23, p<0.001) and higher mean bilirubin levels (26.74 vs. 14.63 µmol/l, p<0.001), as well as lower serum albumin levels (38.2 vs. 41.1 g/l, p=0.015), mean platelets (102.64 vs. 138.95/nl, p=0.014) and mean leukocytes (4.02 vs. 5.68/nl, p=0.002) at baseline as compared to those without decompensation. In the multivariate analysis the MELD score remained independently associated with hepatic decompensation (OR 1.56, 1.18-2.07; p=0.002). When the patients were grouped according to their baseline MELD scores, hepatic decompensation occurred in 22%, 59%, and 83% of patients with MELD scores of 6-9, 10-13, and >14, respectively. Baseline MELD score was significantly associated with the risk for transplantation/death (p<0.001)., Conclusions: Our data suggest that the baseline MELD score predicts the risk of hepatic decompensation during antiviral therapy and thus contributes to decision making when antiviral therapy is discussed in HCV patients with advanced liver cirrhosis.

Unlabelled: Earlier studies have suggested neurocognitive impairment in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection even before liver cirrhosis has developed. Since these deficits might be reversible after successful antiviral therapy, we analyzed the long-term course of neurocognitive parameters in HCV patients with and without successful virus elimination by an interferon-based antiviral treatment. In a multicenter study including 168 HCV patients receiving antiviral therapy (peginterferon alpha-2b and ribavirin) we performed a long-term follow-up of neurocognitive performance before and after treatment. Neurocognitive function was psychometrically assessed using the computer-aided TAP (Test Battery of Attentional Performance). When tested at least 12 months after termination of antiviral treatment, patients with sustained virologic response (SVR) had improved significantly as compared to their pretreatment performance in three of five TAP subtasks (vigilance, P < 0.001; shared attention: optical task, P < 0.001; working memory, P < 0.001). Patients who failed to eradicate the virus, however, showed no significant long-term changes in neurocognitive performance in all five subtasks assessed (0.194 < P < 0.804). In the posttreatment evaluation, neurocognitive function was significantly better in responders to the antiviral therapy as compared to nonresponders., Conclusion: Successful eradication of HCV leads to a significant improvement of relevant aspects of attentional and neurocognitive performance, indicating that the neurocognitive impairment caused by chronic HCV infection is potentially reversible. This therefore suggests an added therapeutic benefit of antiviral treatment in HCV infection. Improvement of neurocognitive function may be an additional treatment indication in patients with HCV. (HEPATOLOGY 2013;58:497-504)., (Copyright © 2013 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.)

The preeminent mode of action of the broad-spectrum antiviral nucleoside ribavirin in the therapy of chronic hepatitis C is currently unresolved. Particularly under contest are possible mutagenic effects of ribavirin that may lead to viral extinction by lethal mutagenesis of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) genome. We applied ultradeep sequencing to determine ribavirin-induced sequence changes in the HCV coding region (nucleotides [nt] 330 to 9351) of patients treated with 6-week ribavirin monotherapy (n = 6) in comparison to placebo (n = 6). Baseline HCV RNA levels maximally declined on average by -0.8 or -0.1 log10 IU/ml in ribavirin- versus placebo-treated patients. No general increase in rates of nucleotide substitutions in ribavirin-treated patients was observed. However, more HCV genome positions with high G-to-A and C-to-U transition rates were detected between baseline and treatment week 6 in ribavirin-treated patients in comparison to placebo-treated patients (rate of 0.0041 transitions per base pair versus rate of 0.0022 transitions per base pair; P = 0.049). Similarly, the sensitive detection of low-frequency minority variants by statistical filtering indicated significantly more positions with G-to-A and C-to-U transitions in ribavirin-treated patients than in placebo-treated patients (rate of 0.0331 transitions versus rate of 0.0186 transitions per G/C-containing position at baseline; P = 0.018). In contrast, non-ribavirin-associated A-to-G and U-to-C transitions were not enriched in the ribavirin group (P = 0.152). We conclude that ribavirin exerts a mutagenic effect on the virus in patients with chronic hepatitis C by facilitating G-to-A and C-to-U nucleotide transitions.

Introduction: Complete suppression of viral replication is crucial in chronic HCV treatment in order to prevent relapse and resistance development. We wanted to find out which factors influence the period from being already HCV RNA negative by bDNA assay (< 615 IU/mL) to become undetectable by the more sensitive TMA test (< 5.3 IU/mL)., Material and Methods: Evaluated were 433 HCV type 1-infected patients. All of them received 1.5 ug/kg Peg-IFNα-2b plus ribavirin for 18-48 weeks. bDNA was performed weekly during the first 8 weeks and thereafter at weeks 12, 24, and 48. Patients who became bDNA undetectable were additionally analysed by TMA., Results: Of the 309 patients with on-treatment response (< 615 IU/mL), 289 also reached undetectable HCV RNA levels by TMA. Multivariate analysis revealed that viremia ≤ 400,000 IU/mL (p = 0.001), fast initial virologic decline (p = 0.004) and absence of fibrosis (p = 0.035) were independent predictors of an accelerated on-treatment response by TMA assay in already bDNA negative patients. bDNA negative patients becoming HCV RNA undetectable by TMA within the following 3 weeks had a frequency of relapse of 21%, whereas those showing TMA negativity after 3 weeks relapsed in 38% (p = 0.001). In RVR patients (bDNA < 615 IU/mL at week 4) the corresponding relapse rates were 15.3% vs. 37.5%, respectively (p = 0.003)., Conclusion: Early viral kinetics, baseline viremia and fibrosis stage are important tools to predict persistent minimal viremia during interferon-based therapy. The data have implications for designing a more refined treatment strategy in HCV infection, even in the setting of protease inhibitor-based triple treatment.

Background & Aims: Guidelines recommend that patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection be treated with pegylated interferon and ribavirin for 24, 48, or 72 weeks, based on their virologic response to treatment. We investigated the effects of treating patients for individualized durations., Methods: We treated 398 treatment-naïve patients who had HCV genotype 1 infections with pegylated interferon alfa-2b and ribavirin for 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 60, or 72 weeks (mean of 39 weeks, termed individualized therapy); the duration of therapy was determined based on baseline viral load and the time point at which HCV RNA levels became undetectable (measured at weeks 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, and 30). Results were compared with those of 225 patients who received standard treatment for 48 weeks (mean of 38 weeks)., Results: Rates of sustained virologic response (SVR) were 55% among patients who received individualized treatment and 48% among those who received standard treatment (P < .0001 for noninferiority). SVR rates, according to the time point at which HCV RNA levels became undetectable, did not differ significantly between groups. Patients with a rapid virologic response (undetectable levels of HCV RNA at week 4) who were treated for 24 to 30 weeks achieved high rates of SVR (86%-88%). Rates of SVR increased among slow responders who first tested negative for HCV RNA at week 24 and were treated for 60 to 72 weeks compared with those treated for 48 weeks (60%-68% vs 43%-44%). The CC polymorphism at IL28B rs129797860 was associated with an increased rate of SVR compared with the CT/TT polymorphism (P < .0001) at baseline but not among patients who had undetectable levels of HCV RNA following treatment., Conclusions: Individualizing treatment of patients with chronic HCV genotype 1 infections for 24 to 72 weeks results in high rates of SVR among rapid responders and increases SVR among slow responders., (Copyright © 2011 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Unlabelled: The benefit of extending treatment duration with peginterferon (PEG-IFN) and ribavirin (RBV) from 48 weeks to 72 weeks for patients with chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 infection has not been well established. In this prospective, international, open-label, randomized, multicenter study, 1,428 treatment-naïve patients from 133 centers were treated with PEG-IFN alfa-2b (1.5 μg/kg/week) plus RBV (800-1,400 mg/day). Patients with detectable hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA and a ≥2-log(10) drop in HCV RNA levels at week 12 (slow responders) were randomized 1:1 to receive 48 weeks (n = 86) or 72 weeks (n = 73) of treatment. Sustained virologic response (SVR) rates were 43% in slow responders treated for 48 weeks and 48% in slow responders treated for 72 weeks (P = 0.644). Relapse rates were similar in slow responders treated for 48 or 72 weeks (47% versus 33%, P = 0.169). The safety profile was similar in both treatment arms; serious adverse events leading to discontinuation of treatment were observed in 3.5% of slow responders treated for 48 weeks and 8.2% of those treated for 72 weeks. Among slow responders with a <2-log drop in HCV RNA at week 8, SVR was 39% in the 72-week arm and 19% in the 48-week arm., Conclusion: These data suggest that 48 weeks of therapy with PEG-IFN alfa-2b plus RBV (800-1,400 mg/day) should remain a standard-of-care treatment for treatment-naïve G1 slow responders.

Unlabelled: Individualized treatment on the basis of early viral kinetics has been discussed to optimize antiviral therapy in chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Individually tailored reduction in treatment duration in HCV type 1-infected patients represents one possible strategy. Four hundred thirty-three patients were randomly assigned to receive either 1.5 microg/kg peginterferon alfa-2b weekly plus 800-1,400 mg ribavirin daily for 48 weeks (n = 225, group A) or an individually tailored treatment duration (18-48 weeks; n = 208, group B). In the latter group, treatment duration was calculated using the time required to induce HCV RNA negativity (branched DNA [bDNA] assay; sensitivity limit, 615 IU/mL) multiplied by the factor 6. All bDNA negative samples were retested with the more sensitive transcription-mediated amplification (TMA) assay (sensitivity limit, 5.3 IU/mL). Sustained virologic response (SVR) rates were significantly lower in group B (34.6% versus 48.0% [P = 0.005]) due to higher relapse rates (32.7% versus 14.2% [P< 0.0005]). Important predictors of response were the levels of baseline viremia as well as the time to TMA negativity on treatment. Taking the simultaneous presence of low baseline viral load (<800,000 IU/mL) and a negative TMA test within the first 4 weeks as predictors for treatment response, SVR rates were comparable between both treatment schedules with an SVR probability of >80% obtained in patients treated for only 18 or 24 weeks., Conclusion: The individualized treatment strategy according to time to bDNA negativity failed to provide comparable efficacy compared with the standard of care. The inferiority of the individualized protocol may be explained by the use of a less sensitive HCV RNA assay, and also by underestimation of the importance of baseline viremia.

Background: Many patients with chronic hepatitis C have not responded to therapy with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin., Objective: To evaluate use of peginterferon-alpha2a plus ribavirin to re-treat nonresponders to peginterferon-alpha2b plus ribavirin., Design: Randomized, parallel-group trial conducted between September 2003 and February 2007. Patients and researchers were not blinded to intervention assignment. Random assignment was centralized, computer-generated, and stratified by geographic region, hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype, and histologic diagnosis., Setting: 106 international centers., Patients: 950 nonresponders to 12 or more weeks of therapy with peginterferon-alpha2b plus ribavirin., Intervention: Peginterferon-alpha2a, 360 microg/wk, for 12 weeks, then 180 microg/wk to complete 72 weeks (group A) or 48 weeks (group B), or peginterferon-alpha2a, 180 microg/wk for 72 weeks (group C) or 48 weeks (group D). All patients received ribavirin, 1000 or 1200 mg/d., Measurements: Sustained virologic response (SVR), defined as undetectable (<50 IU/mL) HCV RNA levels 24 weeks after the end of treatment., Results: The SVR rates in groups A (n = 317), B (n = 156), C (n = 156), and D (n = 313) were 16%, 7%, 14%, and 9%, respectively (relative risk [RR] for group A vs. group D [the primary comparison], 1.80 [95% CI, 1.17 to 2.77]; P = 0.006). Extended treatment duration increased SVR rates (16% for 72 weeks [groups A and C] vs. 8% for 48 weeks [groups B and D]; RR, 2.00 [CI, 1.32 to 3.02]; P < 0.001). Complete viral suppression (HCV RNA level <50 IU/mL)at week 12 was achieved in 21% of patients in groups A and B and 13% of those in groups C and D. Rates of SVR were 49% (77 of 157 patients) and 4% (32 of 719 patients) among those with and without complete viral suppression at week 12, respectively., Limitation: Nonresponders to peginterferon-alpha2a plus ribavirin were not evaluated., Conclusion: Re-treating nonresponders to therapy with peginterferon-alpha2b plus ribavirin for 72 weeks significantly increases SVR rates compared with re-treating them for 48 weeks. The overall SVR rate was low, but patients who are most likely to respond to re-treatment can be identified at week 12., Primary Funding Source: Roche.

Unlabelled: The impact of amantadine on virologic response rates of interferon-based treatment of chronic hepatitis C is controversial. The aim of this study was to compare virological response rates in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV)-1 infection treated with 400 mg amantadine or placebo in combination with peginterferon alfa-2a (40 kD) and ribavirin for 48 weeks. Seven hundred four previously untreated chronically HCV-1-infected patients (mean age, 46 +/- 12 years) were randomized to (A) amantadine-sulphate (400 mg/day) (n = 352) or (B) placebo (n = 352), both in combination with 180 microg peginterferon alfa-2a once weekly and ribavirin (1000-1200 mg/day) for 48 weeks. End of treatment and sustained virological response after a 24-week follow-up period were assessed by qualitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) (sensitivity, 50 IU/mL). Demographic and baseline virological parameters were similar in both treatment groups. In groups A and B, 231 of 352 patients (66%) and 256 of 352 patients (72%) achieved an end of treatment response, and 171 of 352 patients (49 %) and 186 of 352 patients (53 %) a sustained virological response, respectively. On-treatment dropout rate in the amantadine group was significantly higher than in the placebo group (32% versus 23%; P = 0.01). However, adverse events and laboratory abnormalities were similar between both groups. Per-protocol analysis revealed similar sustained virological response rates in both treatment groups (53% versus 55%)., Conclusion: In this large placebo-controlled multicenter study, amantadine even at a dose of 400 mg/day did not improve virological response rates of peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin in patients with chronic genotype HCV-1 infection.

Background: Formation of transmembrane ion channels by hepatitis C virus (HCV) p7 and abrogation of channel function by amantadine was demonstrated in vitro. The relevance of HCV p7 amino acid (aa) variations for response to antiviral therapy with amantadine is unknown., Methods: HCV p7 was sequenced in 86 individuals who were infected with HCV genotype 1. Thirty-six of 86 patients received amantadine within an interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha)-based antiviral therapy. Helical wheel modelling for HCV p7 was performed., Results: No significant correlation of overall aa variations within HCV p7 was observed with response to IFN-alpha-based therapy with amantadine in HCV genotype 1alpha/b infected patients. When analysis was restricted to non-conservative aa variations, a higher number of aa substitutions within complete HCV p7 and transmembrane helix 2 was associated with non-response in HCV-1b-infected patients receiving therapy with amantadine (P=0.015 and P=0.037, respectively), without amantadine (P=0.106 and P=0.118, respectively), and in the total cohort of HCV-1b-infected patients (P=0.00007 and P=0.011, respectively). Furthermore, substitution L20F was observed more often in non-responders than responders with HCV-1b infection and therapy with amantadine (P=0.099). By in silico modelling, aa 20 was located toward the p7 channel lumen. Substitution L20F may impair amantadine action by altering the shape of the ion channel pore., Conclusion: Substitution L20F within HCV p7 may be associated with non-response to combination therapy specifically with amantadine in HCV-1b-infected patients. Non-responders with HCV-1b infection showed higher numbers of non-conservative aa variations within HCV p7 than responders, irrespective of the application of amantadine.

Background/aims: Efficacy and safety of interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha)/ribavirin retreatment with or without amantadine sulphate were evaluated in non-responders with chronic hepatitis C., Methods: Two hundred twenty five consecutive non-responders to previous antiviral treatment(s) with IFN-alpha alone or in combination with ribavirin or amantadine were treated with IFN-alpha 2b 5 MU daily for 4 weeks, 5 MU tiw for 20 weeks, followed by 3 MU tiw for additional 24 weeks combined with ribavirin 1000-1200 mg/d. One hundred fifteen of 225 patients were randomized to receive amantadine sulphate 100 mg bid for 48 weeks. Treatment was discontinued in patients with detectable serum hepatitis C virus (HCV)-RNA at treatment week 24., Results: An overall sustained virologic response with undectable serum HCV-RNA levels was observed in 49/225 patients (22%). Patients infected with HCV-genotype non-1 (P<0.001), low viremia (P=0.011) and only one previous antiviral treatment (P=0.032) were more likely to respond to antiviral retreatment. There was a trend towards higher sustained virologic response rates in patients receiving triple retreatment compared with those treated with IFN-alpha/ribavirin alone (25 versus 18%, P=0.172)., Conclusions: The addition of amantadine was well tolerated and led to an improvement of sustained virologic responses compared with retreatment with IFN-alpha/ribavirin alone, in particular in patients with low baseline viremia.

Background/aims: Since ribavirin was able to improve the antiviral efficacy of interferon alfa in patients with chronic hepatitis C, several other adjuncts have been studied. It has been shown that mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is a more potent inhibitor of the inosine 5'-monophosphate-dehydrogenase (IMPDH) than ribavirin. The present study is a pilot study evaluating the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with interferon alfa-2a and MMF in interferon alfa nonresponder patients., Methods: Thirty-eight adult patients with chronic hepatitis C who did not respond to a previous interferon alfa monotherapy were enrolled to receive 6 million units of interferon alfa-2a tiw in combination with MMF (1 week 500 mg/day, 1 week 1000 mg/day, 22 weeks 2000 mg/day)., Results: An interim analysis of 29 patients after 12 weeks of therapy showed that only one patient had negative hepatitis C virus-RNA at this time point. There was no significant reduction of the viral load during therapy. Due to inefficacy the study was discontinued., Conclusions: Combination therapy of interferon alfa-2a and MMF is ineffective in improving virological response rates in nonresponder patients with chronic hepatitis C. These data suggest that inhibition of the IMPDH seems not to be the major mechanism of ribavirin in enhancing the antiviral effect of interferon alfa in chronic hepatitis C.

Background: Many patients with chronic hepatitis C have not responded to therapy with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin. Objective: To evaluate use of peginterferon-α2a plus ribavirin to re-treat nonresponders to peginterferon-α2b plus ribavirin. Design: Randomized, parallel-group trial conducted between September 2003 and February 2007. Patients and researchers were not blinded to intervention assignment. Random assignment was centralized, computer-generated, and stratified by geographic region, hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype, and histologic diagnosis. Setting: 106 international centers. Patients: 950 nonresponders to 12 or more weeks of therapy with peginterferon-α2b plus ribavirin. Intervention: Peginterferon-α2a, 360 μg/wk, for 12 weeks, then 180 μg/wk to complete 72 weeks (group A) or 48 weeks (group B), or peginterferon-α2a, 180 μg/wk for 72 weeks (group C) or 48 weeks (group D). All patients received ribavirin, 1000 or 1200 mg/d. Measurements: Sustained virologic response (SVR), defined as undetectable (<50 IU/mL) HCV RNA levels 24 weeks after the end of treatment. Results: The SVR rates in groups A (n = 317), B (n = 156), C (n = 156), and D (n = 313) were 16%, 7%, 14%, and 9%, respectively (relative risk [RR] for group A vs. group D [the primary comparison], 1.80 [95% CI, 1.17 to 2.77]; P = 0.006). Extended treatment duration increased SVR rates (16% for 72 weeks [groups A and C] vs. 8% for 48 weeks [groups B and D]; RR, 2.00 [CI, 1.32 to 3.02]; P < 0.001). Complete viral suppression (HCV RNA level <50 IU/mL)at week 12 was achieved in 21% of patients in groups A and B and 13% of those in groups C and D. Rates of SVR were 49% (77 of 157 patients) and 4% (32 of 719 patients) among those with and without complete viral suppression at week 12, respectively. Limitation: Nonresponders to peginterferon-α2a plus ribavirin were not evaluated. Conclusion: Re-treating nonresponders to therapy with peginterferon-α2b plus ribavirin for 72 weeks significantly increases SVR rates compared with re-treating them for 48 weeks. The overall SVR rate was low, but patients who are most likely to respond to re-treatment can be identified at week 12. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background & Aims Ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) for 8 to 24 weeks is approved for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus infection (HCV). In the ION-3 study, 8 weeks of LDV/SOF was non-inferior to 12 weeks in previously untreated genotype 1 (GT1) patients without cirrhosis. According to the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC), 8-week treatment may be considered in naïve non-cirrhotic GT1-patients. However, there are only limited data on the effectiveness of an 8-week regimen of LDV/SOF under real-world conditions. The aim of the present study was to characterise patients receiving 8 weeks of LDV/SOF compared to those receiving 12 weeks of LDV/SOF, and to describe therapeutic outcomes in routine clinical practice. Methods The German Hepatitis C-Registry is a large national real-world cohort that analyses effectiveness and safety of antiviral therapies in chronic HCV. This data set is based on 2,404 patients. Treatment with SOF/LDV (without RBV) for 8 or 12 weeks was initiated on or before September 30, 2015. Results Overall, 84.6% (2,034/2,404) of the safety population (intention-to-treat-1 [ITT1]) and 98.2% (2,029/2,066) of the per protocol (PP) population achieved sustained virological response at week 12 (SVR12). In the 8-week group, 85.1% (824/968) of ITT1 and 98.3% (821/835) of PP patients achieved SVR12, while in the 12-week group, 85.5% (1,210/1,415) of ITT1, and 98.1% (1,208/1,231) of PP patients achieved SVR12. When treated according to the SmPC, 98.7% (739/749) of the patients achieved SVR12 (PP). Relapse was observed in 9.5% (2/21) of cirrhotic patients treated for 8 weeks (PP). Conclusions Under real-world conditions a high proportion of eligible patients receiving 8-week LDV/SOF treatment achieved SVR12. Relapse occurred more frequently in patients who did not meet the selection criteria according to the SmPC. Lay summary In a large real-world cohort of patients mainly treated by physicians in private practice in Germany, shorter HCV treatment (8-week) resulted in equivalent cure rates to 12-week treatment in genotype 1 HCV-infected patients. Thus, shorter treatment can be recommended in these patients which would substantially reduce costs of therapy. Clinical Trial number: DRKS00009717 (German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]