Search

Goals: To determine whether diabetic patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) treated with direct-acting antiviral agents have improved diabetes, accounting for change in both hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and diabetes medications, and whether any improvement was sustained., Background: HCV infection is associated with an increased risk of diabetes, with improvement in glycemic control after eradication. There remains uncertainty about the durability and magnitude of this effect., Study: HbA1c and diabetes medications were recorded at 6-month intervals for 1.5 years pretreatment and posttreatment for 122 patients. Subjects were classified as having improved diabetes if there was a decrease in HbA1c≥0.5% with no increase in diabetes medications or a decrease in diabetes medications with a stable HbA1c., Results: HbA1c at the nearest time point before treatment was 8.4%±1.9%, compared with 7.8%±1.7% after treatment, a mean difference of 0.6% [95% CI (0.2, 0.9), P<0.01]. A linear mixed effects model incorporating each subject's repeated measurements over time also demonstrated a reduction after treatment of 0.5% [95% CI, (0.3, 0.8), P<0.001]. Accounting for both HbA1c and diabetes medications, 42 of 122 (34%) had an improvement in diabetes after HCV treatment, and 20 of 28 (71%) of these subjects sustained improvement at 1.5 years follow-up. Prescription of insulin was associated with improved diabetes., Conclusions: Treatment of HCV with direct-acting antiviral agents was associated with improved diabetes in a significant portion of patients with an average reduction in HbA1c of clinically significant magnitude. Among responders, this effect was sustained over 1.5 years of follow-up.

Background: Treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) with direct-acting antiviral (DAA) regimens has resulted in high rates of sustained virologic response (SVR). Treatment of vulnerable populations may be improved by incorporating an on-site intensive specialty pharmacy (ON-ISP)., Aims: To describe outcomes of HCV treatment at a safety-net hospital and proportion of subjects achieving SVR for those using the ON-ISP compared to an off-site pharmacy (OFF-SP)., Methods: A retrospective cohort study of 219 subjects treated for HCV with DAA at Boston Medical Center was conducted. Subject characteristics, virologic response, and pharmacy services used were recorded. We used multivariable logistic regression to test the association between ON-ISP and SVR after adjusting for covariates., Results: SVR occurred in 71% of subjects by intention-to-treat (73% among ON-ISP users vs 57% among OFF-SP users) and 95% completing treatment per-protocol (96% among ON-ISP users vs 87% among OFF-SP users). Adjustment for age, sex, ethnicity, insurance, fibrosis, prior treatment, and MELD revealed an increased likelihood of SVR among users of ON-ISP: OR 6.0 (95% CI 1.18-31.0). No significant difference in treatment delay or adverse events was seen among users of either pharmacy type., Conclusions: HCV treatment with DAA was well tolerated, but the rate of SVR was low (71%) compared to trials. This was due to loss to follow-up, as the per-protocol rate of SVR was much higher (95%). Use of ON-ISP was associated with an increase in SVR and may be valuable for improving care for vulnerable populations.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a common cause of increased morbidity and mortality in kidney transplant patients. It is associated with posttransplant glomerulonephritis, chronic allograft nephropathy, and New Onset Diabetes after Transplant (NODAT). In the past, HCV was difficult to treat due to the presence of interferon alpha-based therapies that were difficult to tolerate and were associated with adverse side-effects, such as the risk of rejection. With the advent of oral directly acting antiviral therapies, the landscape for HCV and transplantation has changed. These agents are highly effective and well tolerated with minimal side-effects. Sustained viral response rates in excess of 90% are achieved with most current treatment regimens active against all HCV genotypes. These new agents may show an improvement in graft and patient survival while essentially eliminating the risk of acute rejection from the use of prior interferon-based HCV therapies. These agents may also result in an improvement in organ allocation for HCV donor/HCV recipient transplantation. This review is meant to discuss the epidemiology of HCV, the new oral direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) and future opportunities for research in the field of HCV related transplantation., (© 2018 International Society for Hemodialysis.)

Purpose: Recent clinical trials have evaluated treatment strategies for chronic infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) in patients co-infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Our objective was to use these data to examine the cost-effectiveness of treating HCV in an urban cohort of co-infected patients., Methods: A computer-based model, together with available published data, was used to estimate lifetime costs (2004 US dollars), life expectancy, and incremental cost per year of life saved (YLS) associated with 3 treatment strategies: (1) interferon-alfa and ribavirin; (2) pegylated interferon-alfa; and (3) pegylated interferon-alfa and ribavirin. The target population included treatment-eligible patients, based on an actual urban cohort of HIV-HCV co-infected subjects, with a mean age of 44 years, of whom 66% had genotype 1 HCV, 16% had cirrhosis, and 98% had CD4 cell counts >200 cells/mm3., Results: Pegylated interferon-alfa and ribavirin was consistently more effective and cost-effective than other treatment strategies, particularly in patients with non-genotype 1 HCV. For patients with CD4 counts between 200 and 500 cells/mm3, survival benefits ranged from 5 to 11 months, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were consistently less than $75,000 per YLS for men and women of both genotypes. Due to better treatment efficacy in non-genotype 1 HCV patients, this group experienced greater life expectancy gains and lower incremental cost-effectiveness ratios., Conclusions: Combination therapy with pegylated interferon-alfa and ribavirin for HCV in eligible co-infected patients with stable HIV disease provides substantial life-expectancy benefits and appears to be cost-effective. Overcoming barriers to HCV treatment eligibility among urban co-infected patients remains a critical priority.

One hundred eighty human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)- and hepatitis C virus (HCV)-coinfected patients were prospectively evaluated for suitability for interferon and ribavirin therapy. Of the 149 patients with chronic HCV infection who completed the evaluation, 44 (30%) were eligible for treatment and 105 (70%) were ineligible, with the main barriers being missed clinic visits, active psychiatric illness, active drug or alcohol use, decompensated liver disease, or medical illness.

Background: Direct-acting antivirals (DAA) are highly effective at treating Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, with a cure rate >95%. However, the effect of DAAs on kidney function remains debated. Methods: We analyzed electronic health record data for DAA-naive patients with chronic HCV infection engaged in HCV care at Boston Medical Center between 2014 and 2018. We compared the following hypothetical interventions using causal inference methods: 1) initiation of DAA and 2) no DAA initiation. For patients with normal kidney function at baseline (eGFR>90 ml/min/1.73m2), we estimated and compared the risk for reaching Stage 3 chronic kidney disease (CKD) (eGFR≤60 ml/min/1.73m2) under each intervention. For patients with baseline CKD Stages 2–4 (152), we estimated and compared the mean change in eGFR at 2 years after baseline under each intervention. We used the parametric g-formula to adjust our estimates for baseline and time-varying confounders. Results: First, among 1390 patients with normal kidney function at baseline the estimated 2-year risk difference (95% CI) of reaching Stage 3 CKD for DAA initiation versus no DAA was -1% (-3, 2). Second, among 733 patients with CKD Stage 2–4 at baseline the estimated 2-year mean difference in change in eGFR for DAA initiation versus no DAA therapy was -3 ml/min/1.73m2 (-8, 2). Conclusions: We found no effect of DAA initiation on kidney function, independent of baseline renal status. This suggests that DAAs may not be nephrotoxic; furthermore, in the short-term, HCV clearance may not improve CKD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. Ongoing substance use is a potential confounder for immunological studies on hepatitis C virus (HCV), but there is little in the literature regarding the effects of injection drug use (IDU) or alcohol on HCV-specific immune responses. We wanted to determine whether IDU or alcohol affected immune responses in HCV-infected and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/HCV coinfected subjects. Methods. Eight-four subjects with HIV/HCV and 57 with HCV were classified as either injection drug users, drinkers, or nonusers based on questionnaire results. Immune responses were studied with enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot assay for interferon (IFN)-γ, interleukin (IL)-10, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α against HCV proteins Core, NS3, and NS5 and recall antigens. Results. Subjects with HIV/HCV, in aggregate, had significantly lower HCV-specific IFN-g and TNF-aresponses than subjects with HCV. However, HIV/HCV injection drug users had HCV specific IFN-γ and IL-10 responses that were similar to those of HCV injection drug users and were significantly higher than in nonusers with HIV/HCV. Conversely, subjects who drank alcohol had similar immune responses to those who were abstinent, among both subjects with HIV/HCV and subjects with HCV. Conclusions. Studies that examine IFN-γ or IL-10 immune responses in HIV/HCV-coinfected or HCV-infected persons need to consider current IDU. Alcohol, at levels consumed in this cohort, does not appear to have as much of an effect on antigen-specific immune responses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article assesses the relation between alcohol consumption and laboratory markers of HIV disease progression. It shows that heavy alcohol consumption has a negative impact on the CD4 cell count in HIV-infected persons not receiving antiretroviral therapy. The findings suggest that avoiding heavy alcohol consumption in patients not on ART may have a beneficial effect on HIV disease progression.