Herpes simplex virus (HSV) type 1 (HSV-1) and human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) are important human pathogens (2). Diseases caused by these viruses are treated with nucleoside analogs (ganciclovir and cidofovir) and foscarnet, which share a common molecular target: viral DNA polymerase (13). With the exception of the antisense phosphorothioate oligonucleotide fomivirsen (37), clinical resistance to these drugs has emerged (14). Consequently, there is a need for new therapeutics with molecular targets distinct from those inhibited by the drugs already on the market. Toward this goal, we have described a series of pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidine nucleoside analogs that contain a number of compounds (Fig. (Fig.1)1) with potent and selective inhibitory activities against HSV-1 and/or HCMV (24-26, 41-45, 51). Time-of-addition and time-of-removal studies have established that these multiplicity of infection-dependent compounds act early or very early in the viral replication cycle, after entry into the cell but before activation of viral DNA polymerase activity (20). FIG. 1. Structures of the substituted purine and pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidines used in this study. The compounds were purchased or were synthesized as described in Materials and Methods. It has been advanced that the replication of HSV and HCMV requires G1-specific, cell cycle regulatory cyclin-dependent kinases (cdks) (3-6, 22, 46-48). Arrest of the cell cycle just past the G1 restriction point could make available an abundance of macromolecular precursors that these herpesviruses require for replication. This involves the release of E2 factor (E2F) transcription factors from the inhibitory E2F-Rb (Rb represents the retinoblastoma susceptibility gene product) complex by mechanisms including the actions of cdk2/cyclin E (for a review, see reference 34). This model is supported by the association of HSV (19) and HCMV (4) infection with the activation of cdk2/cyclin E and the synchronization of HCMV- and HSV-infected cells in G1/S (3, 12). Indeed, the major immediate-early proteins of HCMV have been shown to play a role in cell cycle progression through G1. For example, IE1p72 phosphorylates specific E2Fs and pocket proteins (29, 36) and relieves p107-mediated suppression of an E2F-responsive promoter (38). IE2p86 has been shown to induce G1 arrest in transfected cells (53), to bind to Rb (15), to act as a transcription factor for cyclin E (6), to block the protein cdk inhibitors Cip1 and Kip1 (3), and to relieve Rb-mediated suppression of E2F- and thymidine kinase-specific genes (29). Similarly, immediate-early HSV proteins have been shown to interact with cell cycle regulatory cdks, E2Fs, or Rb and pocket proteins. ICP0 binds to and stabilizes cyclin D3, maintaining the function of cdk4 (23), and its expression blocks cells at the G1/S border (27). ICP22 and the UL13 gene product have been shown to activate cdk1 (1). These interactions between immediate-early promiscuous transactivating viral proteins and cellular cell cycle-specific proteins are analogous to those seen in DNA tumor viruses. Simian virus 40, adenovirus, and human papillomavirus express gene products (large T antigen, E1A, and E7, respectively) which appear to upregulate cell cycle progression by binding to and sequestering Rb (33, 35). However, there are indications that the interaction of viral proteins with cdk cell cycle regulation is not canonically established. As an alternative, it has been reported that HCMV IE1p72 cannot relieve Rb-mediated suppression of an E2F-responsive promoter (38). HCMV IE2p86 has been shown to be insufficient to induce cyclin E (30) and to halt cell cycle progression independently of Rb, p53, and Cip1 (53). Greaves and Mocarski (17) have propagated a fibroblast cell line stably expressing physiologically relevant levels of the IE1p72 protein through multiple cell cycles, which indicates that the expression of this protein is insufficient to induce cell cycle arrest, a finding confirmed by others (7). Cells infected with HCMV (21) and HSV (1) have been shown to synchronize in G2/M phase, in contrast to G1/S phase. It has also been demonstrated that HSV replicates independently of the mammalian cell cycle (8, 9). Nonetheless, Schaffer and coworkers (22, 46-48) propose a specific requirement for cdks in HSV replication based upon the inhibitory effects of roscovitine, a purine analog being evaluated as an anticancer agent (32). Roscovitine is a protein kinase inhibitor specific for cdks 1, 2, and 5; and its potencies against these enzymes are equal, regardless of their regulatory cyclin subunits (11). Roscovitine is inactive against some 40 other cellular kinases examined (11). Schaffer and coworkers (22, 46-48) have shown that roscovitine inhibits HSV-1 replication at all stages of the lytic viral life cycle at concentrations sufficient to synchronize cells in S phase. The inability of those investigators to isolate virus resistant to roscovitine pointed toward a mechanism of action in which the inhibition of cellular cdks was responsible for antiviral activity (46). Likewise, Albrecht and coworkers (4) have demonstrated that roscovitine inhibits HCMV replication. Although the antiviral effects of roscovitine were clearly demonstrated in the previous studies, the cytotoxicity controls used in those studies did not clearly establish selective inhibition of these viruses in the absence of detrimental effects to host cells. Consistent with the previous investigators' inability to select HSV isolates resistant to roscovitine (46), we have been unable to select HCMV isolates resistant to the pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidine nucleoside analogs used in this study (20). Furthermore, some compounds in this series have previously been described as cellular kinase inhibitors; e.g., sangivamycin inhibits protein kinase C (28), and toyocamycin inhibits cdk1 (31). Also consistent with a mechanism of action not involving a nucleic acid polymerase, pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidines do not require phosphorylation to exhibit antiviral activity (43). On the basis of the information presented above, we have evaluated the hypothesis that pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidines exert their antiviral effects in a manner similar to that by which roscovitine exerts its antiviral effects, namely, by inhibition of cdks. (Portions of the work in this paper were reported at the 13th International Conference on Antiviral Research, Baltimore, Md., April 2000.)