Search

Background: We aimed to evaluate the cardiac adverse events (AEs) in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) who received remdesivir plus standard of care (SoC) compared with SoC alone (control), as an association was noted in some cohort studies and disproportionality analyses of safety databases., Methods: This post hoc safety analysis is based on data from the multicenter, randomized, open-label, controlled DisCoVeRy trial in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Any first AE that occurred between randomization and day 29 in the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population randomized to either remdesivir or control group was considered. Analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves, and Kaplan-Meier estimates were calculated for event rates., Results: Cardiac AEs were reported in 46 (11.2%) of 410 and 48 (11.3%) of 423 patients in the mITT population (n = 833) enrolled in the remdesivir and control groups, respectively. The difference between both groups was not significant (hazard ratio [HR], 1.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], .7-1.5; P = .98), even when serious and nonserious cardiac AEs were evaluated separately. The majority of reports in both groups were of arrhythmic nature (remdesivir, 84.8%; control, 83.3%) and were associated with a favorable outcome. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the occurrence of cardiac AE subclasses, including arrhythmic events (HR, 1.1; 95% CI, .7-1.7; P = .68)., Conclusions: Remdesivir treatment was not associated with an increased risk of cardiac AEs compared with control in patients hospitalized with moderate or severe COVID-19. These results are consistent with other randomized, controlled trials and meta-analyses. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT04315948; EudraCT 2020-000936-23., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. D. C. reports an human immunodeficiency virus grant from Janssen and lecture fees from Pfizer, outside the submitted work. F. M. reports grants and consulting fees from Pharmatheus, grants from Sanofi, and consulting fees from Ipsen, outside the submitted work. M. H. reports grants from the Belgian Center for Knowledge, the Fonds Erasme-COVID-Université Libre de Bruxelles, and the EU-Horizon programme, for the submitted work; support for attending meetings from Pfizer, MSD and Gilead, Pharmamar; support for participation on an advisory board for therapeutics on COVID-19 (DisCoVeRy trial); support for leadership for the Belgian guidelines on therapeutics for COVID-19; acting as president for the Belgian Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases; and payment for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Pfizer, Gilead, GKS, INSMED, and Shionogi. J. P. reports lecture fees from Gilead and MSD; support for attending meetings from Gilead, Eumedica, and Merck Sharp & Dohme, outside the submitted work. C. B. reports participation on a DSMB for 4Living Biotech and consulting fees from Da Volterra and Mylan Pharmaceuticals, outside the submitted work. R. G. reports consulting fees from Celgene, Novartis, Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb, Takeda, AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Merck, Gilead, and Daiichi Sankvo; lecture fees from Celgene, Roche, Merck, Takeda, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Sandoz, AbbVie, Gilead, and Daiichi Sankvo; support for attending meetings from Roche, Amgen, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Celgene, Gilead, Bristol Myers Squibb, AbbVie, and Daiichi Sankvo; participation on a DSMB for Celgene, Novartis, Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb, Takeda, AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Merck, Gilead, and Daiichi Sankyo; research grants from Celgene, Roche, Merck, Takeda, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Sandoz, AbbVie, Gilead, and Daiichi Sankyo; and stock or stock options from Novo Nordisk, Lilly. J.-A. P. reports consulting fees from Pfizer, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Janssen-Cilag, and AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals; lecture fees from Cepheid, Pfizer, and Gilead; and support for attending meetings from Pfizer and Gilead. C. A. reports lecture fees from Insmed, GSK, Moderna, AstraZeneca, and Chiesi; grants or contracts from FEDER funding; support for attending meetings from Home perf; a leadership or fiduciary role as president of the Scientific Council of the French Respiratory Society; and serving as a member of the French ANRS-MIE for COVID and member of the COVID Group of the French Public Health High Council. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

Purpose: Direct-acting antiviral agents have demonstrated their efficacy in treating HCV recurrence after liver transplantation and particularly the sofosbuvir/daclatasvir combination. Pharmacokinetic data on both calcineurin inhibitors and direct-acting antiviral exposure in liver transplant recipients remain sparse., Methods: Patients were enrolled from the ANRS CO23 CUPILT cohort. All patients treated with sofosbuvir/daclatasvir with or without ribavirin were included in this study when blood samples were available to estimate the clearance of immunosuppressive therapy before direct-acting antiviral initiation and during follow-up. Apparent tacrolimus and cyclosporine clearances were estimated from trough concentrations measured using validated quality control assays., Results: Sixty-seven mainly male patients (79%) were included, with a mean age of 57 years and mean MELD score of 8.2; 50 were on tacrolimus, 17 on cyclosporine. Ribavirin was combined with sofosbuvir/daclatasvir in 52% of patients. Cyclosporine clearance remained unchanged as well as tacrolimus clearance under the ribavirin-free regimen. Tacrolimus clearance increased 4 weeks after direct-acting antivirals and ribavirin initiation versus baseline (geometric mean ratio 1.81; 90% CI 1.30-2.52). Patients under ribavirin had a significantly higher fibrosis stage (> 2) (p = 0.02) and lower haemoglobin during direct-acting antiviral treatment (p = 0.02) which impacted tacrolimus measurements. Direct-acting antiviral exposure was within the expected range., Conclusion: Our study demonstrated that liver transplant patients with a recurrence of hepatitis C who are initiating ribavirin combined with a sofosbuvir-daclatasvir direct-acting antiviral regimen may be at risk of lower tacrolimus concentrations because of probable ribavirin-induced anaemia and higher fibrosis score, although there are no effects on cyclosporine levels., Trial Registration: NCT01944527.

Background: A recurrence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) after liver transplantation affects survival in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/HCV coinfected patients. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of sofosbuvir (SOF)-based regimens in HIV/HCV coinfected patients after liver transplantation., Methods: Twenty-nine HIV/HCV coinfected transplanted patients receiving tacrolimus-, cyclosporine-, or everolimus-based immunosuppressive therapy were enrolled in the Compassionate Use of Protease Inhibitors in Viral C Liver Transplantation cohort. Their antiviral treatment combined SOF, daclatasvir with or without ribavirin (n = 10/n = 6), or SOF, ledipasvir with or without ribavirin (n = 2/n = 11)., Results: The median delay between liver transplantation and treatment initiation was 37.5 months (interquartile range [IQR], 14.4-99.2). The breakdown of HCV genotypes was G1, 22 patients (75.9%); G3, 3 patients (10.3%); and G4, 4 patients (13.8%). The treatment indications were HCV recurrence (≥ F1 n = 23) or fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis (n = 6). Before starting SOF, the HCV viral load and CD4 count were 6.7 log10 IU/mL (IQR, 5.9-7.2) and 342 cells/mm (IQR, 172-483), respectively. At week 4, the HCV viral load was less than 15 IU/mL in 12 (42.9%) patients. The overall sustained virological response 12 was 96.6%. No significant drug-drug interactions were observed., Conclusions: SOF-based treatment regimens produced excellent results in HIV/HCV coinfected patients after liver transplantation, suggesting an important change in their prognosis.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is associated with reduced patient survival following combined liver-kidney transplantation (LKT). The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of second-generation direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) in this difficult-to-treat population. The ANRS CO23 "Compassionate use of Protease Inhibitors in Viral C Liver Transplantation" (CUPILT) study is a prospective cohort including transplant recipients with recurrent HCV infection treated with DAAs. The present work focused on recipients with recurrent infection following LKT. The study population included 23 patients. All patients received at least one NS5B inhibitor (sofosbuvir) in their antiviral regimen an average of 90 months after LKT. Ninety-six percent of recipients achieved a sustained virological response (SVR) at week 12 (SVR12). In terms of tolerance, 39% of recipients presented with at least one serious adverse event. None of the patients experienced acute rejection during therapy and there were no deaths during follow-up. The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) decreased significantly from baseline to the end of therapy. However, this study did not show that the decline in GFR persisted over time or that it was directly related to DAAs. The DAA-based regimen is well tolerated with excellent results in terms of efficacy. It will become the gold standard for the treatment of recurrent HCV following LKT., (© 2017 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.)

Recurrence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) after liver transplantation (LT) can rapidly lead to liver graft cirrhosis and, therefore, graft failure and retransplantation or death. The aim of the present study was to assess efficacy and tolerance of sofosbuvir (SOF)-based regimens for the treatment of HCV recurrence in patients with severe fibrosis after LT. The Compassionate Use of Protease Inhibitors in Viral C Liver Transplantation (CULPIT) study is a prospective multicenter cohort including patients with HCV recurrence following LT treated with second generation direct antivirals. The present study focused on patients included between October 2013 and November 2014 and diagnosed with HCV recurrence and liver graft extensive fibrosis (METAVIR F3/F4). A SOF-based regimen was administered to 125 patients fulfilling inclusion criteria. The median delay from LT was 95.9 ± 69.6 months. The characteristics of patients were as follows: mean age, 59.4 ± 9.0 years; 78.4% male; infected by HCV genotype 1: 78.2%, mean HCV RNA: 6.1 ± 1.0 log10 IU/mL. Eighty patients had failed previous post-LT antiviral therapy (64.0%) including triple therapy with first generation protease inhibitors in 19 (15.2%) patients. The main combination regimen was SOF/daclatasvir (73.6%). Ribavirin was used in 60 patients. Sustained virological response 12 weeks after treatment was 92.8% (on an intention-to-treat basis); 7 patients with virological failure were observed. Serious adverse events occurred in 25.6% of the patients during antiviral treatment. During antiviral treatment and follow-up, 3 patients were retransplanted and 4 patients died. In conclusion, SOF-based antiviral treatment shows very promising results in patients with HCV recurrence and severe fibrosis after LT. Liver Transplantation 22 1367-1378 2016 AASLD., (© 2016 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.)

Background & Aims: Fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis (FCH) is a life-threatening disorder that develops in patients with recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection after liver transplantation. Until recently, therapeutic options have been limited. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of sofosbuvir- and daclatasvir-based regimens., Methods: We analyzed data from 23 patients with FCH who participated in a prospective cohort study in France and Belgium of the effects of antiviral agents in patients with recurrence of HCV infection after liver transplantation, from October 2013 through April 2014. Most of the patients had genotype 1 infections that had not responded to previous treatment; 4 patients also were infected with human immunodeficiency virus. Eight patients (37%) had ascites and 15 patients (65%) had bilirubin levels greater than 100 mmol/L; their median serum level of HCV RNA was 7 log IU/mL. The median time between transplantation and treatment initiation was 5 months. Subjects were given either sofosbuvir and daclatasvir (n = 15) or sofosbuvir and ribavirin (n = 8) for 24 weeks. The primary outcome was complete clinical response (survival without re-transplantation, bilirubin level <34 μmol/L, and no ascites or hepatic encephalopathy 36 weeks after treatment began)., Results: All patients survived, without re-transplantation, until week 36. Rapid and dramatic improvements in clinical status were observed. The patients' median bilirubin concentration decreased from 122 μmol/L at baseline to a normal value at week 12 of treatment. Twenty-two patients (96%) had a complete clinical response at week 36. Despite the low rate of rapid virologic response, 22 patients (96%) achieved a sustained virologic response at week 12. The only relapse of HCV infection occurred in a patient with human immunodeficiency virus infection who received sofosbuvir and ribavirin. Tolerance was satisfactory, with no grade 3 or 4 adverse events related to sofosbuvir or daclatasvir and no significant interactions among drugs., Conclusions: Sofosbuvir therapy with daclatasvir or ribavirin leads to major clinical improvement and high rates of sustained virologic response at week 12 in most patients with recurrence of HCV infection and FCH after liver transplantation. ClinicalTrial.gov no: NCT01944527., (Copyright © 2015 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)