Search

Objective: Selected populations of patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) may benefit from a combined use of pegylated interferon-alpha (pegIFN-α) and nucleos(t)ides (NUCs). The aim of our study was to assess the immunomodulatory effect of pegIFN-α on T and natural killer (NK) cell responses in NUC-suppressed patients to identify cellular and/or serological parameters to predict better T cell-restoring effect and better control of infection in response to pegIFN-α for a tailored application of IFN-α add-on., Design: 53 HBeAg-negative NUC-treated patients with CHB were randomised at a 1:1 ratio to receive pegIFN-α-2a for 48 weeks, or to continue NUC therapy and then followed up for at least 6 months maintaining NUCs. Serum hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg) levels as well as peripheral blood NK cell phenotype and function and HBV-specific T cell responses upon in vitro stimulation with overlapping HBV peptides were measured longitudinally before, during and after pegIFN-α therapy., Results: Two cohorts of pegIFN-α treated patients were identified according to HBsAg decline greater or less than 0.5 log at week 24 post-treatment. PegIFN-α add-on did not significantly improve HBV-specific T cell responses during therapy but elicited a significant multispecific and polyfunctional T cell improvement at week 24 post-pegIFN-α treatment compared with baseline. This improvement was maximal in patients who had a higher drop in serum HBsAg levels and a lower basal HBcrAg values., Conclusions: PegIFN-α treatment can induce greater functional T cell improvement and HBsAg decline in patients with lower baseline HBcrAg levels. Thus, HBcrAg may represent an easily and reliably applicable parameter to select patients who are more likely to achieve better response to pegIFN-α add-on to virally suppressed patients., Competing Interests: Competing interests: CF: Grant: Gilead, Abbvie. Consultant: Gilead, Abbvie, Vir Biotechnology Inc, Arrowhead, Transgene, BMS; MRB: speaker Bureau for AbbVie, Gilead, EISAI-MSD and advisor for AbbVie, Gilead, Janssen, AstraZeneca; PL: advisor and speaker bureau for Advisory Board/Speaker Bureau for Roche Pharma/diagnostics, Gilead Sciences, GSK, Abbvie, Janssen, Myr, Eiger, Antios, Aligos, Vir, Grifols, Altona, Roboscreen; SPF is employee of and stock-holder in Gilead Sciences, Inc. The remaining authors disclose no conflicts., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background and Aims: Chronic hepatitis D is the most debilitating form of viral hepatitis frequently progressing to cirrhosis and subsequent decompensation. However, the HDV entry inhibitor bulevirtide is only approved for antiviral treatment of patients with compensated disease. We aimed for the analysis of real-world data on the off-label use of bulevirtide in the setting of decompensated liver cirrhosis., Approach and Results: We conducted a retrospective study in patients with HDV with decompensated liver disease at German, Austrian, and Italian centers. We included 19 patients (47% male, mean age: 51 years) with liver cirrhosis Child-Pugh B. The median MELD score was 12 (range 9-17) at treatment initiation. The median observation period was 41 weeks. Virologic response was achieved in 74% and normal alanine aminotransferase was observed in 74%. The combined response was achieved by 42%. The most relevant adverse events included self-limited alanine aminotransferase flares, an asymptomatic increase in bile acids, and the need for liver transplantation. Despite bile acid increases, adverse events were considered unrelated. Clinical and laboratory improvement from Child-Pugh B to A occurred in 47% (n = 9/19). Improvements in the amount of ascites were observed in 58% of the patients initially presenting with ascites (n = 7/12)., Conclusions: This report on off-label bulevirtide treatment in patients with decompensated HDV cirrhosis shows similar virologic and biochemical response rates as observed in compensated liver disease. Significant improvements were observed in surrogates of hepatic function and portal hypertension. However, this improvement was not seen in all patients. Controlled trials are needed to confirm the safety and efficacy of bulevirtide in decompensated HDV cirrhosis., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Chronic hepatitis delta (CHD) affects approximately 10-20 million people worldwide and represents the most severe form of chronic viral hepatitis, as it is characterized by high rates of progression to cirrhosis and its complications (end-stage liver disease, hepatocellular carcinoma). In the last 30 years, the only treatment option for CHD has been represented by the off-label administration of Interferon (or Pegylated Interferon)-alpha: antiviral treatment, however, resulted in suboptimal (20-30%) virological response and was burdened by several side effects, de facto contraindicating Interferon (IFN) administration in patients with more advanced liver disease. Recently, Bulevirtide (BLV), a first-in-class HBV-HDV entry inhibitor blocking Na + -taurocholate co-transporting polypeptide (NTCP), has provided very promising efficacy data in Phase II and Phase III (interim analysis) trials as well as in preliminary real-life reports. In July 2020, BLV has granted conditional approval by EMA for treatment of compensated CHD, at the dose of 2 mg/day by self-administered subcutaneous injections. In Phase II and Phase III trials, BLV was evaluated at different doses (2 vs. 10 mg/day) for 24 or 48 weeks, either in monotherapy or in combination with PegIFN. Administration of BLV monotherapy for 24 or 48 weeks resulted in 50%-83% virological response (HDV RNA ≥ 2 Log decline) rates and 45%-78% ALT normalization. Combination therapy with PegIFN provided synergistic effects. These results were replicated in real-life studies and confirmed also in patients with advanced cirrhosis and clinically significant portal hypertension. BLV treatment was optimally tolerated, resulting only in an asymptomatic increase of bile acids., (© 2022 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Chronic hepatitis Delta (CHD) is a rare and severe form of chronic viral hepatitis. Until recently, the only therapeutic approach has been the off-label use of a 48 weeks course of PegInterferon alpha (PegIFNα), that was characterized by suboptimal efficacy and burdened by significant side effects that limited treatment applicability in patients with advanced liver disease. In July 2020, European Medicines Agency (EMA) conditionally approved the entry inhibitor Bulevirtde (BLV) at the dose of 2 mg/day for the treatment of adult patients with compensated CHD. Efficacy and safety of BLV in CHD have been evaluated in clinical trials either as monotherapy or in combination with PegIFNα. These results were confirmed by real-life studies, which also evaluated long-term BLV monotherapy in patients with advanced compensated cirrhosis. Notwithstanding these promising results there are still several issues to be addressed, such as the optimal duration of the treatment, the rates of off-therapy responses, as well as the long-term clinical benefits. This review summarizes updated and current literature data about clinical trials and real-life studies with BLV monotherapy and/or in combination with PegIFNα., (© 2023 The Authors. Journal of Viral Hepatitis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background & Aims: Bulevirtide (BLV) has recently been conditionally approved for the treatment of chronic hepatitis delta (CHD) in Europe, but its effectiveness and safety in patients with compensated cirrhosis and clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) are unknown., Methods: Consecutive patients with HDV-related compensated cirrhosis and CSPH who started BLV 2 mg/day were enrolled in this single-center study. Clinical/virological characteristics were collected at baseline, weeks 4, 8 and every 8 weeks thereafter. HDV RNA was quantified by Robogene 2.0 (lower limit of detection 6 IU/ml)., Results: Eighteen Caucasian patients with compensated cirrhosis and CSPH under nucleos(t)ide analogue treatment were enrolled: median (IQR) age was 48 (29-77) years, and 67% were male. Median (IQR) platelet count was 70 (37-227) x10 3 /μl, liver stiffness measurement (LSM) 16.4 (7.8-57.8) kPa, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) 106 (32-222) U/L, HBsAg 3.7 (2.5-4.3) log IU/ml, HDV RNA 4.9 (3.3-6.6) log IU/ml. During 48 weeks of BLV monotherapy, HDV RNA declined by 3.1 (0.2-4.3) log IU/ml (p <0.001 vs. baseline), becoming undetectable in 5 patients (23%). A virological response was observed in 14 (78%) patients while a non-response was observed in 2 (11%). ALT decreased to 35 (15-86) U/L (p <0.001 vs. baseline), normalizing in 83% of patients. A combined response was observed in 67% of patients. Aspartate aminotransferase and gamma-glutamyltransferase levels significantly improved. Concerning liver function parameters, albumin values significantly increased and bilirubin remained stable. LSM significantly improved in patients with virological response, while platelet count was unchanged. None of the patients developed decompensating events or hepatocellular carcinoma. BLV was well tolerated, no patient discontinued treatment and the increase in bile acids was fully asymptomatic., Conclusions: A 48-week course of BLV 2 mg/day monotherapy is safe and effective even for difficult-to treat patients with HDV-related compensated cirrhosis and CSPH., Lay Summary: Hepatitis delta virus (HDV) is associated with the most severe form of viral hepatitis. A new treatment for HDV called bulevirtide has recently received conditional approval for patients with chronic HDV infection. However, its safety and effectiveness in patients with more advanced liver disease is not known. Herein, we show that it is safe and effective in patients with HDV-related cirrhosis and clinically significant portal hypertension., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest Elisabetta Degasperi: Advisory Board: AbbVie; Speaking and teaching: Gilead, MSD, AbbVie; Alessandro Loglio: Travel grant for MYR Pharma, Speaker bureau for Gilead Sciences; Fabien Zoulim: Advisor for Aligos, Antios, Arbutus, Assembly, Gilead, GSK, MYR Pharma, Roche Pietro Lampertico: Advisor and speaker bureau for BMS, Roche, Gilead Sciences, GSK, MSD, Abbvie, Janssen, Arrowhead, Alnylam, Eiger, MYR Pharma, Antios, Aligos. Other authors have nothing to disclose. Please refer to the accompanying ICMJE disclosure forms for further details., (Copyright © 2022 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The benefit of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) against HCV following successful treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains controversial. This meta-analysis of individual patient data assessed HCC recurrence risk following DAA administration., Design: We pooled the data of 977 consecutive patients from 21 studies of HCV-related cirrhosis and HCC, who achieved complete radiological response after surgical/locoregional treatments and received DAAs (DAA group). Recurrence or death risk was expressed as HCC recurrence or death per 100 person-years (100PY). Propensity score-matched patients from the ITA.LI.CA. cohort (n=328) served as DAA-unexposed controls (no-DAA group). Risk factors for HCC recurrence were identified using random-effects Poisson., Results: Recurrence rate and death risk per 100PY in DAA-treated patients were 20 (95% CI 13.9 to 29.8, I 2 =74.6%) and 5.7 (2.5 to 15.3, I 2 =54.3), respectively. Predictive factors for recurrence were alpha-fetoprotein logarithm (relative risk (RR)=1.11, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.19; p=0.01, per 1 log of ng/mL), HCC recurrence history pre-DAA initiation (RR=1.11, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.16; p<0.001), performance status (2 vs 0, RR=4.35, 95% CI 1.54 to 11.11; 2 vs 1, RR=3.7, 95% CI 1.3 to 11.11; p=0.01) and tumour burden pre-HCC treatment (multifocal vs solitary nodule, RR=1.75, 95% CI 1.25 to 2.43; p<0.001). No significant difference was observed in RR between the DAA-exposed and DAA-unexposed groups in propensity score-matched patients (RR=0.64, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.1; p=0.1)., Conclusion: Effects of DAA exposure on HCC recurrence risk remain inconclusive. Active clinical and radiological follow-up of patients with HCC after HCV eradication with DAA is justified., Competing Interests: Competing interests: VS: travel funding from Bayer. FT: DSMB fees from Basilea Pharmaceutica International and ROVI; educational fees from Janssen and Ferrer. PN: consults for AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Eisai, Gilead, Ipsen, Roche. He received grants from AbbVie and BMS. ZM: speaker fees and consultancy for Gilead and AbbVie. RT: personal fees from Merk Sharp & Dorme, Giliad Sciences and AbbVie GK. TM: personal fees from Merk Sharp & Dorme, Giliad Sciences and AbbVie GK. XF: consultancy fees for AbbVie and Gilead Sciences. HT: speaker fees from AbbVie, Gildead, MSD and Bayer. SB: consultancy fees and educational grants from: Gilead Sciences, MSD, Intercept. ED: advisory board from AbbVie; speaking and teaching from Gilead, MSD, AbbVie. M-LY: research grant from Abbott, BMS, Gilead and Merck; consultant of AbbVie, Abbott, BMS, Gilead, Merck and Roche; speaker of AbbVie, Abbott, BMS, Gilead and Merck. YA: donation-funded department funded by Toray Industries Inc., Gilead Sciences, AbbVie GK and Fuji Rebio Inc. AS: has received research funding from AbbVie and Gilead. He has served as a consultant for Wako Diagnostics, Glycotest, Exact Sciences, Roche, GRAIL, Genentech, Bayer, Eisai, Exelixis, AstraZeneca, BMS and TARGET Pharmasolutions. MK: lecture fees from Abott and AstraZeneca. J-FD: advisory committees: AbbVie, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Falk, Genfit, Genkyotex, Gilead Sciences, HepaRegenix, Intercept, Lilly, Merck, Novartis. Speaking and teaching: Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Intercept, Genfit, Gilead Sciences, Novartis, Roche. NM: research founding, lecture fees, advisory committees and travel grants from MSD. Lecture fees, advisory committees and travel grants from AbbVie and Gilead. SP: consulting and lecturing fees from Janssen, Gilead, MSD, AbbVie, Biotest, Shinogui, Viiv and grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead, Roche and MSD, without relation to this manuscript. JC: grants and research support from Gilead Sciences, AbbVie, MSD, Shionogi and Intercept Pharmaceuticals (all outside the submitted work). Is a speaker for Gilead Sciences and AbbVie. JLC: reports grant support and/or consultancy and lecture fees from AbbVie, Gilead Sciences, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen and MSD. RV: research grant from AbbVie. GS: consultancy fees and lecture fees from Gilead and AbbVie. FPR: lecture fees AbbVie, Gilead, MSD, Biotest; travel funds AbbVie, Biotest, Kedrion; research funds AbbVie, Gilead, MSD. RB: research grants from MSD, AbbVie and Gilead. JR: educational grants from Amgen, Grüenenthal Pharma, Boehringer Ingelheim España, Janssen-Cilag, Ferrer International, Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme and Roche Farma. FT: consultancy fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Eisai and Sirtex. Lecture fees from AlfaSigma and Bayer. Research grants from Bayer. CC: consultancy fees from Bayer, EISAI, MSD, Gilead, ABV. JB: consultancy fees from Arqule, Bayer, Novartis, BMS, BTG-Biocompatibles, Eisai, Kowa, Terumo, Gilead, Bio-Alliance/Onxeo, Roche, AbbVie, Merck, Sirtex, Ipsen, Astra-Medimmune, Incyte, Quirem, Adaptimmune, Lilly, Basilea, Nerviano. Research grants from Bayer and BTG. Educational grants from Bayer and BTG. Lecture fees from Bayer, BTG-Biocompatibles, Eisai, Terumo, Sirtex, Ipsen. GC: consultancy fees from Bayer, Ipsen. MR: consultancy fees from Bayer, BMS, Roche, Ipsen, AstraZeneca and Lilly. Lecture fees from Bayer, BMS, Gilead, Lilly and Roche. Research grants from Bayer and Ipsen., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Prothrombin induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist-II (PIVKA-II) and alpha fetoprotein (AFP) are biomarkers for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, their performance in patients with cirrhosis related to hepatitis C virus (HCV) treated with direct-acting antiviral agents (DAA) is unknown., Aim: To evaluate PIVKA-II and AFP as HCC predictors in DAA-treated patients with HCV-related cirrhosis METHODS: In this single centre study, patients with cirrhosis from chronic HCV infection and with a sustained virological response (SVR) to DAA were tested for PIVKA-II and AFP (Fujirebio, Japan) at the start of DAA treatment (baseline), end of treatment (EOT) and at HCC diagnosis., Results: We included 400 patients with mean age 65 (24-92); 56% were men. From baseline to EOT, PIVKA-II did not change (35 vs 35 mAU/mL, P = 0.43) while AFP significantly decreased (12 vs 6 ng/mL, P < 0.0001). After 52 (3-66) months from baseline, 34 (8.5%) patients developed de novo HCC; median AFP 9 (2-12 868) ng/mL and PIVKA-II 80 (22-1813) mAU/mL. EOT-PIVKA-II (HR 3.05, P < 0.0001) and AFP (HR 2.77, P = 0.001) independently predicted HCC together with diabetes (HR 6.12, P < 0.001) and GGT (HR 1.01, P = 0.03). The 4-year cumulative probability of HCC was 24% vs 2% in patients with EOT-PIVKA-II > or ≤41 mAU/mL (P < 0.0001), and 26% vs 9% for EOT-AFP > or ≤15 ng/mL (P = 0.02). By combining EOT-PIVKA-II and AFP, the 4-year probabilities of HCC were 3% in patients testing negative for both markers, 18% in patients positive for both, and 38% in patients positive for at least one (P < 0.0001)., Conclusions: In patients with HCV-related cirrhosis treated with DAA, PIVKA-II and AFP independently predicted HCC, while their combination improved risk stratification., (© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Nonselective β-blockers improve decompensation-free survival in viremic hepatitis C virus compensated cirrhotic patients with clinically significant portal hypertension, but their protective role after sustained virological response by direct-acting antiviral (DAA) is undefined. We evaluated the incidence of decompensation in DAA-cured Child-A patients without high-risk varices. During the 49-month (12-60) follow-up, only one of 148 patients decompensated (ascites), with a 4-year cumulative risk of 1%, but decompensation was associated with hepatocellular carcinoma. The risk of decompensation in DAA cured hepatitis C virus compensated Child-A cirrhotic patients with clinically significant portal hypertension but without high-risk varices is negligible; thus, questioning the need for nonselective β-blocker treatment in this setting (see Visual abstract, Supplemental Digital Content, 1, http://links.lww.com/AJG/B861). JOURNAL/ajgast/04.03/00000434-202106000-00035/inline-graphic1/v/2021-05-28T144026Z/r/image-tiff., (Copyright © 2021 by The American College of Gastroenterology.)

Background & Aims: There are limited data on patients with chronic HCV infection in whom combination voxilaprevir (VOX), velpatasvir (VEL), sofosbuvir (SOF) retreatment fails. Thus, we aimed to assess treatment failure and rescue treatment options in these patients., Methods: Samples from 40 patients with HCV genotypes (GT) 1-4 in whom VOX/VEL/SOF retreatment failed were collected within the European Resistance Study Group. Population-based resistance analyses were conducted and clinical parameters and retreatment efficacies were evaluated retrospectively in 22 patients., Results: Most VOX/VEL/SOF failure patients were infected with HCV GT3a (n = 18, 45%) or GT1a (n = 11, 28%) and had cirrhosis (n = 28, 70%). Previous treatments included an NS3-inhibitor (30%), an NS5A-inhibitor (100%) and SOF (85%). Baseline RAS data from a subgroup of patients before VOX/VEL/SOF retreatment (78%) showed few NS3 RASs apart from Q80K in GT1a (40%), typical NS5A RAS patterns in most patients (74%) and no S282T in NS5B. Sequencing after VOX/VEL/SOF failure was available in 98% of patients and showed only minor changes for NS3 and NS5A RASs. In 22 patients, rescue treatment was initiated with glecaprevir, pibrentasvir alone (n = 2) or with SOF±ribavirin (n = 15), VOX/VEL/SOF±ribavirin (n = 4) or VEL/SOF and ribavirin (n = 1) for 12 to 24 weeks. Sustained virologic response was achieved in 17/21 (81%) patients with a final treatment outcome. Of these, 2 GT3a-infected patients had virologic failure after rescue treatment with VEL/SOF or glecaprevir/pibrentasvir+SOF+ribavirin, and 2 patients with cirrhosis died during treatment or before reaching SVR12., Conclusions: VOX/VEL/SOF failure was mainly observed in HCV GT3- and GT1a-infected patients with cirrhosis and was not associated with specific RAS patterns within NS3, NS5A or NS5B target regions. Rescue treatment with multiple targeted therapies was effective in most patients., Lay Summary: The advent of direct-acting antivirals has enabled the effective cure of chronic hepatitis C in most patients. However, treatment failure occurs in some patients, who are often retreated with a combination regimen called VOX/VEL/SOF, which is associated with very high rates of cure. However, VOX/VEL/SOF retreatment also fails in some patients. Herein, we analysed samples from patients in whom VOX/VEL/SOF retreatment failed and we assessed the efficacy of different rescue therapies, showing that rescue treatment is effective in most patients (81%)., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest Julia Dietz: Research support from Gilead. Dolores Merino: Speaking and/or consulting fees from Gilead, ViiV Health Care, Merck/MSD, Janssen. Johannes Vermehren: Speaking and/or consulting fees from Abbott, AbbVie, Gilead, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Medtronic, Merck/MSD, and Roche. Andreas E. Kremer: Speaking and/or consulting fees: AbbVie, Beiersdorf, Bristol-Myers Squibb, CymaBay, Eisai, Falk, Gilead, GSK, Intercept, Lilly, MSD, and Zambon. Heinz Zoller: Speaking and/or consulting fees: Abbott, AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead, Merck/MSD, Pharmacosmos, Roche, Vifor. Grant support from Abbvie, Gilead, Pharmacosmos, and Vifor. Elisabetta Degasperi: Speaking and/or consulting fees: AbbVie, Gilead, MSD. Laura Sighinolfi: Speaking and/or consulting fees: Merck/MSD, ViiV Healthcare. Elisa Fernández-Fuertes: Speaking and/or consulting fees: Abbvie, Gilead, Merck/MSD, Janssen, ViiV. Leopoldo Muñoz-Medina: Speaking and/or consulting fees: AbbVie, Gilead, Janssen, ViiV. Rudolf Stauber: Speaking and/or consulting fees: AbbVie, Bayer, BMS, Eisai, Ipsen Gilead, Roche. Pietro Lampertico: Speaking and/or consulting fees: AbbVie, Alnylam, Arrowhead, BMS, Eiger, Gilead, GSK, Janssen, MSD, MYR, Roche, Spring Bank. Stefan Zeuzem: Speaking and/or consulting fees: Abbvie, BMS, Gilead, Janssen, Merck/MSD. Francesca Ceccherini-Silberstein: Speaking and/or consulting fees: Abbvie, Gilead, Janssen, Merck/MSD, ViiV Healthcare. Federico García: Speaking and/or consulting fees: Abbvie, Gilead, Hologic, Merck/MSD, Roche, Qiagen. Christoph Sarrazin: Speaking and/or consulting fees: Abbvie, Gilead, Merck/MSD, Research support: Abbvie, Gilead. All other authors report no conflicts of interest. Please refer to the accompanying ICMJE disclosure forms for further details., (Copyright © 2020 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: In patients treated for HCV infection, potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs) can occur among direct-acting antiviral drugs (DAAs) and comedications used. The real-life effectiveness and safety of elbasvir/grazoprevir (ELB/GZR) among co-medicated HCV patients was evaluated., Methods: We prospectively evaluated consecutive patients from 15 clinical centres participating in PITER who were treated with ELB/GZR and had been followed for at least 12 weeks after treatment. Data were prospectively collected on the use of comedications (including discontinuation, dose modification and addition of drugs) and potential DDIs with DAAs., Results: Of the 356 patients with at least 12-week post-treatment follow-up (median age 67, range 50-88 years), 338 (95%) achieved sustained virological response. Of these, 219 (60%) had at least one comorbidity (median 2, range 1-6); information on comedication was available for 212 of them. Of 190 comedications used, 15 (8%) drugs were modified during ELB/GZR therapy, specifically in 9 (4%) patients they were interrupted, in 2 (1%) of whom, the comedication was interrupted before the DAA therapy because of potential DDI (that is, patients treated with carbamazepine); in 12 (6%) patients the comedications were modified in terms of dosage. In 29 (14%) patients, the comedications required monitoring when used with ELB/GZR, as well as with all available DAAs. Of the 190 drugs, 27 (14%) used in 67% of patients were free of DDIs when used with ELB/GZR, whereas they required monitoring if used with other DAA regimens., Conclusions: The results of this prospective study support findings that ELB/GZR is effective and safe in most treated patients.

Background & Aims: Patients with cirrhosis and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection treated with direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) are still at risk for developing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We aimed to identify features of de novo or recurrent HCCs in these patients, and factors associated with HCC development, in a large cohort of patients with cirrhosis who received treatment with DAAs., Methods: In a retrospective study, we collected data from 565 patients with cirrhosis (median age, 64 years; range, 28-87 years; 60% male, 49% infected with HCV genotype 1; median liver stiffness measurement [LSM], 19.1 kPa; 87% Child-Pugh-Turcotte score A) treated with DAAs at a single center in Italy, from December 2014 through 2016. Cirrhosis was defined based on clinical features, histologic factors (METAVIR F4), or LSM >11.9 kPa. Patients were assessed (complete blood analysis and HCV-RNA quantification) every 4 weeks during treatment; at weeks 4, 12, and 24 afterward; and at 6-month intervals thereafter. HCC surveillance was performed by ultrasound or CT scans every 3-6 months, based on history of HCC. Non-invasive markers of fibrosis, such as ratio of aspartate aminotransferase to platelets, fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) score, and LSMs were assessed., Results: During a median 25 months of follow up (range, 3-39 months), HCC developed in 28/505 patients without a history of HCC (de novo HCC); the 3-year estimated cumulative probability for HCC was 6% (95% CI, 4%-9%). Of patients with de novo HCC, 75% had a single tumor and 82% of these were Barcelona liver cancer stage 0-A; the median level of alpha-fetoprotein was 6 ng/mL (range, 1.0-9240 ng/mL). Male sex (hazard ratio [HR], 6.17; 95% CI, 1.44-26.47; P = .01), diabetes (HR, 2.52; 95% CI, 1.08-5.87; P = .03), LSM (HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01-1.06; P = .01), and FIB-4 score (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.01-1.14; P = .01) were independently associated with de novo HCC. HCC developed in 20/60 patients with a history of HCC (HCC recurrence); the 3-year cumulative probability for recurrence was 43% (95% CI, 20%-61%). In the 20 patients with HCC recurrence, 11 had a single tumor and 90% were Child-Pugh-Turcotte score A. Diabetes was independently associated with HCC recurrence (HR, 4.12; 95% CI, 1.55-10.93; P = .004)., Conclusions: In a large, single-center cohort of consecutive patients with cirrhosis and who received DAA treatment for HCV infection, most liver tumors were identified at early stages. Male sex, diabetes, and non-invasive markers of liver fibrosis can be used to identify patients at increased risk for HCC following DAAs therapy., (Copyright © 2019 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Ombitasvir/paritaprevir-ritonavir (OBT/PTV-r) plus ribavirin (RBV) for 12 weeks in hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 4 patients with advanced fibrosis has been only investigated in clinical trials., Aims: To assess safety and efficacy of OBT/PTV-r + RBV for 12 weeks in real-life HCV-4 patients with advanced fibrosis., Methods: HCV-4 patients with advanced fibrosis consecutively receiving OBT/PTV-r + RBV for 12 weeks in a single center were enrolled. Fibrosis was staged by transient elastography (TE) (F3: ≥10 kPa; F4 ≥11.9 kPa) or histologically. Sustained virological response (SVR) was defined as undetectable HCV-RNA 12 weeks post-treatment., Results: Between January 2016 and February 2017, 49 HCV-4 patients were included: median age 54 (39-72) years, 84% males, 59% Egyptians, 35% fibrosis F3 and 65% F4, all Child Pugh class A. Median RBV dose was 1200 (200-1200) mg/day. At ITT analysis, 47 (96%) patients achieved an SVR (100% at PP analysis). SVR was not affected by ancestry (Egyptian vs. Italian 97% vs. 95%, p = 1.0), fibrosis stage (F3 vs. F4 100% vs. 94%, p = .53), presence of baseline resistance associated substitutions (RASs) or RBV reduction., Conclusions: We report 100% SVR with 12-weeks of OBT/PTV-r + RBV in HCV-4 patients with advanced liver disease, including compensated cirrhotics., (Copyright © 2018 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: The efficacy of direct-acting anti-viral (DAA) therapy in patients with a history of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is unknown., Aim: We prospectively evaluated whether previously treated HCC affects DAA efficacy in a large real-life cohort of cirrhotic patients., Methods: From January to December 2015 all consecutive HCV mono-infected patients with cirrhosis and/or history of HCC attending 10 Italian tertiary liver centres were enrolled. Baseline characteristics and response to therapy were recorded. 1927 patients were enrolled (mean age: 62.1 ± 10.9 years; 1.205 males). Genotype 1 was the most frequent (67.9%) followed by genotypes 3 (12.4%), 2 (11.2%) and 4 (8.6%). 88.4% and 10.9% of cases were classified Child A and B, respectively, and 14 (<1%) cases were classified Child C. Ascites and hepatic encephalopathy occurred in 10.7% and 3.2% of patients, respectively. Varices were detected in 39.3% of patients. Suboptimal and optimal treatment was prescribed: 15.9% of patients received sofosbuvir/simeprevir, 33.4% sofosbuvir/ledipasvir, 20.2% a Viekirax + Exviera regimen, 15.7% sofosbuvir/ribavirin, 9.9% sofosbuvir/daclatasvir and 3.4% Viekirax; 1.3% of patients received an interferon-based regimen., Results: The sustained virologic response (SVR) rate at intention-to-treat analysis was 95.1%. It differed significantly across Child classes, that is, 96.3%, 86.1% and 71.4% Child A, B and C, respectively (P < 0.0001) and across genotypes (P = 0.002). The SVR rate did not differ between patients with (95.0%) and those without previous HCC (95.1%). At multivariable analysis, SVR was significantly associated with HCV genotype, Child class., Conclusion: This large real-life study proves that the efficacy of DAA in cirrhotic patients is not impaired by successfully treated HCC., (© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Chronic infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a multifaceted disease characterized by many extrahepatic manifestations (EHMs) that affect outcome and quality of life. HCV eradication by antiviral treatment has been proved beneficial in preventing the development of EHMs and is also able to improve many HCV-related severe disorders and neurocognitive outcomes and quality of life. Until recently, antiviral therapy of EHMs was limited to the presence of interferon-based treatment, and was contraindicated in many patients because of hematologic toxicity or risk of exacerbating immune-mediated disorders. The availability of interferon-free regimens solves this issue allowing for enhanced safety and efficacy to provide universal treatment of HCV-related EHMs., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Directly-acting antivirals (DAA) have finally allowed all patients to be potentially cured from chronic hepatitis C (HCV) infection. All-oral, Interferon (IFN)-free regimens are based upon the combination of molecules targeting different sites of the HCV replication process. Three classes of DAA exist: protease inhibitors (anti-NS3/4A), RNA-dependent polymerase inhibitors (anti-NS5B) and anti-NS5A inhibitors, which are characterized by different antiviral potency and barrier to resistance and therefore are usually combined in different treatment schedules. Treatment regimens are still largely dependent on HCV genotype and stage of liver disease, with duration ranging between 12 weeks and 24 weeks, while overall treatment efficacy has climbed to nearly 95% in most patient groups, including historically difficult-to-treat categories (HCV genotype 1, advanced liver disease). The elimination of IFN has allowed safe and efficacious treatment of patients formerly contraindicated to antiviral therapy, such as decompensated cirrhosis and solid organ transplant recipients. Availability of potent and safe antiviral drugs combined with improvement of worldwide access to treatment could finally lead to HCV elimination in the next decades., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) require long-term administration of immunomodulatory treatments to maintain disease remission. Due to the high worldwide prevalence of hepatitis B (HBV) or C (HCV) virus infections, presence of concurrent hepatitis can be a relevant clinical issue to manage when treating IBD. Areas covered: The paper summarizes epidemiological data about IBD and HBV/HCV infection and reviews current knowledge about the natural history of HBV and HCV in the IBD setting, concentrating on risk of hepatitis reactivation during immunosuppressive treatment. Most updated recommendations for management of HBV and HCV infections in IBD patients are discussed. Expert commentary: The development of new drugs for IBD with different molecular targets and the availability of potent and efficacious antiviral drugs for HBV and HCV will simplify management of hepatitis infection in IBD patients in the near future.

Background & Aims: Widespread use of direct-acting antiviral (DAA) agents to treat patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has reduced the need for monitoring of HCV RNA levels, because viral kinetics do not predict sustained virologic response (SVR) to these drugs. However, the performance of cheaper tests such as the assay to quantify HCV core antigen (HCV Ag) has not been determined. We investigated the accuracy of the HCV Ag test in predicting which patients receiving DAAs will achieve SVRs at week 12 (SVR12)., Methods: We performed a prospective study of 58 patients infected with HCV genotypes 1-5 (45% with HCV genotype 1, 72% with cirrhosis) receiving DAA therapy from the Liver Center at the Università degli Studi of Milan in Italy from January to March 2015. We collected blood samples and measured levels of HCV Ag and HCV RNA at baseline, after 2 and 4 weeks of treatment, the end of treatment, and 12 weeks after treatment ended. We compared the ability of these assays to predict which patients would have SVR12., Results: The median baseline level of HCV RNA was 5.79 log10 IU/mL (range, 3.51-7.31 log10 IU/mL) and of HCV Ag was 3226.87 fmol/L (range, 17.30-54,927.00 fmol/L). HCV Ag became undetectable in 71% of patients at week 2, 84% at week 4, and 93% at the end of treatment. HCV RNA became undetectable in 10% of patients at week 2, 43% at week 4, and 100% at the end of treatment (P < .0001). Concordance between the tests in identifying patients who would achieve SVR12 was 40% at week 2, 55% at week 4, and 95% at the end of treatment. Fifty-three of 58 patients (91%) achieved an SVR12; the test for HCV Ag identified 97% of these patients. The tests for HCV Ag and HCV RNA predicted which patients would have SVR12 with positive predictive values of 90% vs 83%, respectively, at week 2 and 89% vs 92%, respectively, at week 4., Conclusions: Tests that measure HCV Ag monitor efficacy of DAA therapy for HCV infection as well as assays that measure HCV RNA and can be recommended for clinical practice. However, measurement of HCV RNA after treatment can rule out relapse in HCV Ag-positive patients., (Copyright © 2016 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Following more than 20 years of Interferon (IFN)-based treatment for hepatitis C virus (HCV), the understanding of viral life cycle led to the development of new antiviral drugs directly targeting HCV replication steps. Daclatasvir (DCV) is a potent inhibitor of non-structural NS5A HCV protein with pangenotypic activity and low-moderate barrier to resistance suitable for IFN-free combination with other direct acting antivirals (DAAs)., Areas Covered: The present review summarizes DCV key pharmacokinetic features and results from Phase II and III trials, discussing also NS5A resistance. Main literature articles have been identified through Pubmed and Medline search; moreover, abstracts from recent international meetings on liver disease have been scrutinized., Expert Opinion: DCV in combination with other DAAs has provided IFN-free regimens with increased efficacy and tolerability. However, suboptimal barrier to resistance and the rapid development of new second-generation NS5A inhibitors will probably make DCV a relatively short-lived drug.

Background: Severe anemia is a common side effect of Pegylated Interferon + Ribavirin (PR) and Telaprevir (TVR) in hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 patients with advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis (F3-F4). Inosine triphosphatase (ITPA) genetic variants are associated with RBV- induced anemia and dose reduction., Aim: To test the association of ITPA polymorphisms rs1127354 and rs7270101 with hemoglobin (Hb) decline, need for RBV dose reduction (RBV DR), erythropoietin (EPO) support and blood transfusions during the first 12 weeks of TVR triple therapy., Materials and Methods: 69 consecutive HCV-1 patients (mean age 57 years) with F3-F4 who received PR and TVR were genotyped for ITPA polymorphisms rs1127354 and rs7270101. Estimated ITPA deficiency was graded on severity (0-3, no deficiency/mild/moderate/severe)., Results: ITPA deficiency was absent in 48 patients (70%), mild in 12 (17%) and moderate in 9 patients (13%). Mean week 4 Hb decline was higher in non ITPA deficient patients (3,85 g/dL) than in mildly or moderately ITPA deficient patients (3,07 g/dL and 1,67 g/dL, p<0.0001). Grade 3-4 anemia developed in 81% non ITPA deficient patients versus 67% mild deficient and 55% moderate deficient patients (p = ns). Grade of ITPA deficiency was not associated with RbvDR (no deficiency: 60%, mild: 58%, moderate: 67%; p = ns), EPO use (no deficiency: 65%, mild: 58%, moderate:56%; p = ns) or need for blood transfusion (no deficiency: 27%, mild: 17%, moderate: 33%; p = ns)., Conclusions: In patients with F3-F4 chronic hepatitis C receiving TVR based therapy, ITPA genotype does not impact on the management of early anemia.

Chronic HBV and HCV are progressive diseases leading to cirrhosis and liver transplantation. Persistent viral eradication or suppression can positively affect the natural course of the infection, by preventing disease progression. Since its introduction more than 30 years ago, IFN-α has represented the foundation of HBV and, lately, anti-HCV treatment. Pegylation of the IFN-α molecule (PegIFN-α2a) has provided improvements in both efficacy and administration schedule, thus becoming part of the standard-of-care regimen for HCV and HBV therapy in the last 10 years. Currently, treatment of finite duration with PegIFN-α2a may achieve a sustained virological response off-treatment and HBsAg seroconversion. PegIFN-α2a will most likely remain the backbone of HCV treatment for the next few years, despite the availability of direct-acting antivirals that are expected to improve cure rates. However, many efforts are concentrated on developing new compounds, with the goal of administrating all oral regimens and eliminating PegIFN from anti-HCV treatment.

Recently, genome-wide association studies (GWAS) in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection have identified two functional single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the inosine triphosphatase (ITPA) gene, that are associated strongly and independently with hemolytic anemia in patients exposed to pegylated-interferon (Peg-IFN) plus ribavirin (RBV) combined therapy. Here has been developed a simplified allele discrimination polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay named allelic inhibition of displacement activity (AIDA) for evaluation of ITPA polymorphisms. AIDA system relies on three unlabeled primers only, two outer common primers and one inner primer with allele-specific 3' terminus mismatch. DNA samples from 192 patients with chronic HCV infection were used to validate the AIDA system and results were compared with the gold standard TaqMan(®) SNP genotyping assay. Concordant data were obtained for all samples, granting for high specificity of the method. In conclusion, AIDA is a practical one-tube method to reproducibly and to assess accurately rs7270101 and rs1127354 ITPA SNPs., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency approval of first generation directly acting antivirals NS3 protease inhibitors boceprevir and telaprevir opens a new era in the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection. Indeed telaprevir and boceprevir registration trials clearly showed a substantial improvement in rates of sustained virological response both in naive and in treatment-experienced patients, with the possibility of shortened regimens in a consistent subset of patients, through the optimization of treatment algorithms. Phases 2 and 3 studies also provided the basis for the management of side effects in order to maximize the safety profile of directly acting antivirals. However, the entry of triple therapy in current clinical practice comes with some unresolved topics, such as relevance of IL28B genetic testing and other pretreatment predictors in patient selection, use of the 4-week pretreatment lead-in phase with dual therapy, safety of triple therapy in some high-risk patient categories and specific management of directly acting antivirals-induced anaemia. As a consequence of these open issues, clinical practice guidelines on triple therapy released by American and European associations provide slightly different recommendations, effectively leaving these "grey" areas wide open for individual interpretation in everyday clinical practice., (Copyright © 2012 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Unlabelled: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is associated with insulin resistance (IR), which is a condition known to influence the progression of liver fibrosis and the response to pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN)/ribavirin (RBV) therapy. We aimed to assess whether a sustained virological response (SVR) after antiviral therapy prevents the development of IR in the long term. Members of the Milan Safety Tolerability study cohort, who received PEG-IFNα2a/RBV or PEG-IFNα2b/RBV, underwent a homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) at the baseline and 24 months after treatment completion. For all patients (n = 431), a liver biopsy sample was scored for grading, staging (Ishak), and steatosis. At the baseline, IR (HOMA value > 2) was detected in 48 patients (12%), and it was associated with body weight (P = 0.03), an HCV load < 0.6 × 10(6) IU/L (P = 0.006), fibrosis staging ≥ 4 (P = 0.01), and moderate to severe steatosis (P = 0.03). IR did not influence the rates of end-of-treatment response (75% versus 69%, P = 0.4), SVR (63% versus 60%, P = 0.8), or relapse (19% versus 24%, P = 0.5). After treatment, IR developed in 49 of the 384 nondiabetic patients (14%). Although the mean baseline and posttreatment HOMA values were similar in SVR patients (1.11 ± 0.8 versus 1.18 ± 1.1, P = 0.25), patients experiencing treatment failure showed a significant increase in the mean HOMA value at the follow-up visit (1.20 ± 0.85 versus 1.49 ± 1.3, P = 0.007), and there was an increased rate of de novo IR in non-SVR patients versus SVR patients (17% versus 7%, P = 0.007). According to a logistic regression analysis, treatment failure (odds ratio = 2.81, 95% confidence interval = 1.39-5.67, P = 0.004) and a 10% body mass index increase (odds ratio = 6.42, 95% confidence interval = 1.69-24.3, P = 0.006) were significantly associated with the development of de novo IR., Conclusion: In nondiabetic patients with chronic HCV, the achievement of SVR with PEG-IFN and RBV prevents the development of de novo IR., (Copyright © 2012 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.)

Background & Aims: The success of pegylated-interferon (PegIFN)/ribavirin (Rbv) therapy of chronic hepatitis C is compromised by liver fibrosis. Whether fibrosis equally affects the two PegIFNα-based therapies is unknown. To assess the response to the two PegIFN regimens in patients with different degree of liver fibrosis., Methods: A sub-analysis of the MIST study: 431 consecutive naïve patients randomly assigned, based on HCV genotype, to receive either (A) PegIFNα2a 180 μg/wk plus daily Rbv 800-1200 mg or (B) PegIFNα2b 1.5 μg/kg/week plus daily Rbv 800-1200 mg, were stratified according to Ishak staging (S) into mild (S0-S2) or moderate (S3, S4) fibrosis and cirrhosis (S5, S6)., Results: In A the sustained virological response (SVR) rates were not significantly influenced by fibrosis stage (71% in S0-S2, 66% in S3, S4, 53% in S5, S6, p=0.12), compared to B where the SVR rates differed according to fibrosis stage (65%, 46%, and 38%, p=0.004, respectively). This was even more so in HCV-1/4 patients treated with PegIFNα2b where the SVR rates were twice as many in S0-S2 vs. S≥3 (44% vs. 22%, p=0.02), while in A the SVR rates were similar between the two fibrosis subgroups (S0-S2: 47% vs. S≥3: 48%, p=0.8). By logistic regression analysis genotype 1/4 and lack of rapid virological response were independent predictors of treatment failure in both treatment groups, while S≥3 fibrosis was associated to PegIFNα2b treatment failure, only (OR 2.83, 95% CI 1.4-5.68, p=0.004)., Conclusions: Liver fibrosis was an independent moderator of treatment outcome in patients receiving PegIFNα2b, not in those receiving PegIFNα2a., (Copyright © 2011 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection represents a major health problem, being a leading cause of cirrhosis and liver transplantation worldwide. Viral eradication achieved by Peginterferon and Ribavirin therapy is the only therapeutic option that can prevent fibrosis progression in chronic hepatitis and liver-related complications in cirrhotic patients. Unfortunately, the occurrence of potentially serious side effects argues against universal treatment of HCV-infected patients. Indeed most scientific societies suggest that eligibility for therapy be based on baseline factors, the so called clinical drivers for treatment eligibility. Current international guidelines recommend focusing on the severity of liver disease, likelihood of treatment response in terms of chances of sustained virological response (SVR) to antiviral therapy and risk of serious adverse events when making treatment decisions. However, evidence exists that treatment may benefit also patients with mild fibrosis and that baseline predictions of a SVR are inaccurate because of the key role of HCV kinetics while on-therapy. An extended treatment programme is further supported by the fact that an increase in the number of patients treated would ultimately result in a long-term reduction of liver-related deaths., (© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.)