Search

Objectives: To report up to 3-year safety and effectiveness of certolizumab pegol (CZP) in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis from a postmarketing surveillance study., Methods: Patients enrolled previously completed 24 weeks of CZP in the 24-week postmarketing surveillance study. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were recorded for patients who received ≥1 CZP dose. Effectiveness outcomes were 28-joint Disease Activity Score with erythrocyte sedimentation rate and European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology response. Week 24-156 safety and Week 0-52 effectiveness data are reported here., Results: A total of 781 patients were enrolled, with 735 and 376 patients evaluated for safety and effectiveness, respectively. Within the safety set, 17.8% (131/735) of patients reported ADRs; 9.4% (69/735) reported serious ADRs. Among patients with history of respiratory, thoracic, and mediastinal disorders, 38.4% (28/73) reported ADRs. The most frequent ADRs were infections and infestations (11.8%; 87/735); skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders (1.9%; 14/735); respiratory, thoracic, and mediastinal disorders (1.6%; 12/735). Mean 28-joint Disease Activity Score with erythrocyte sedimentation rate reduced from 4.6 (Week 0) to 2.8 (Week 52). At Week 52, 51.8% (161/311) of patients achieved European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology Good response., Conclusions: The long-term safety and effectiveness of CZP in the real-world setting in Japan were consistent with previously reported data; no new safety signals were identified., (© Japan College of Rheumatology 2024. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Objective: The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of sarilumab on unacceptable pain [UP; visual analogue scale (VAS) >40 mm] and inflammation in patients with moderately-to-severely active rheumatoid arthritis., Methods: In this post hoc analysis of the KAKEHASI study, 243 patients received methotrexate with sarilumab 150 or 200 mg or placebo every other week, over 52 weeks. The proportion of patients with UP and correlations of changes in pain VAS from baseline with uncontrolled inflammation (C-reactive protein ≥1 mg/dl) and disease activity indices were assessed., Results: Almost 80% of patients (192/243) had UP at baseline, including ∼60% of patients with uncontrolled inflammation. Among patients receiving sarilumab, inflammation decreased rapidly, with 90% of patients achieving controlled inflammation by Week 2, while 63.1% continued to have UP. The proportion of patients with UP further decreased by Week 16 (28.5%, sarilumab vs. 64.0%, placebo). By Week 52, only ∼10% of patients had UP. Changes in pain VAS correlated with most disease activity indices and patient-reported outcomes. However, marked correlations between changes in pain VAS and C-reactive protein were observed only at Week 16., Conclusion: Sarilumab treatment reduced UP and inflammation in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis., (© Japan College of Rheumatology 2023. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Objectives: An interim analysis of post-marketing surveillance data to assess the safety and effectiveness of sarilumab in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis refractory to previous treatment., Methods: The interim analysis included patients who initiated sarilumab therapy between June 2018 and January 2021. The primary objective of this surveillance was safety., Results: In total, 1036 patients were enrolled and registered by 12 January 2021 (interim cut-off date). Of these, 678 were included in the safety analysis [75.4% female; mean age (± standard deviation) 65.8 ± 13.0 years]. Adverse drug reactions, defined as adverse events classified as possibly or probably related to sarilumab, were reported in 170 patients (incidence: 25.1%), with white blood cell count decreased (4.4%) and neutrophil count decreased (1.6%) most frequently reported. Serious haematologic disorders (3.4%) and serious infections (including tuberculosis) (2.5%) were the most frequently reported priority surveillance items. No malignant tumour was reported. An absolute neutrophil count (ANC) below the minimum standard value did not increase the incidence of serious infections., Conclusions: Sarilumab was well tolerated, and no new safety signals were noted in this analysis. There was no difference in the frequency of serious infections between patients with an ANC below or above normal., (© Japan College of Rheumatology 2023. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Methotrexate (MTX), the anchor drug in the current treatment strategy for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), was first approved for the treatment of RA in Japan in 1999 at a recommended dose of 6-8 mg/week. The approved maximum dose of MTX has been 16 mg/week since February 2011 when MTX was approved as a first-line drug in the treatment of RA. Recent evidence of MTX-polyglutamate concentration in the red blood cells of Japanese patients with RA justifies the current daily use of MTX in Japan. Additionally, after a nationwide clinical trial, a subcutaneous MTX injection formula (7.5-15 mg/week) was approved for RA treatment in September 2022. Therefore, in March 2023, a subcommittee of the Japan College of Rheumatology updated the guidance (formerly 'guidelines') for the use of MTX in Japanese patients with RA. This article, an abridged English translation summarizing the 2023 update of the Japan College of Rheumatology guidance for the use of MTX and management of patients with RA, will be helpful to both Japanese and global rheumatology communities., (© Japan College of Rheumatology 2023. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Background: Upadacitinib, a Janus kinase inhibitor, has demonstrated efficacy and an acceptable safety profile in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) in the phase III SELECT-AXIS programs. We report the 1-year efficacy and safety in patients with AS and an inadequate response to biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARD-IR) from the SELECT-AXIS 2 study., Methods: Patients ≥ 18 years with active AS who met the modified New York criteria for AS and were bDMARD-IR received double-blind upadacitinib 15 mg once daily (QD) or placebo for 14 weeks. Patients who completed 14 weeks could enter an open-label extension and receive upadacitinib 15 mg QD for up to 2 years. Efficacy endpoints included the percentage of patients achieving ≥ 40% improvement in Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society response (ASAS40), Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) low disease activity (LDA), and ASDAS inactive disease (ID); and change from baseline in total and nocturnal back pain, and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI). Subgroup analyses (bDMARD lack of efficacy versus intolerance, and prior tumor necrosis factor inhibitor [TNFi] versus interleukin-17 inhibitor [IL-17i] exposure) were conducted. Binary and continuous efficacy endpoints were assessed using non-responder imputation with multiple imputation (NRI-MI) and as observed (AO) analyses; and mixed-effects model repeated measures (MMRM) and AO, respectively. Safety was assessed based on adverse events. Data through week 52 are reported., Results: Of 420 randomized patients, 366 (continuous upadacitinib: n = 181; placebo to upadacitinib: n = 185) completed 52 weeks of treatment. At week 52, in the continuous upadacitinib and placebo to upadacitinib groups, ASAS40, ASDAS LDA, and ASDAS ID were achieved by 66% and 65%, 57% and 55%, and 26% and 25% (all NRI-MI); and change from baseline in total back pain, nocturnal back pain, and BASFI was -4.5 and -4.3, -4.6 and -4.4, and -3.6 and -3.5 (all MMRM), respectively. No new safety risks were identified. Subgroup analyses were consistent with the overall study population., Conclusions: Upadacitinib 15 mg QD demonstrated sustained improvement up to 52 weeks in bDMARD-IR patients with AS. Efficacy was generally similar in patients with lack of efficacy versus intolerance to bDMARDs and prior TNFi versus IL-17i exposure., Trial Registration: NCT02049138., (© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.)

Objectives: Anaemia is a frequent extra-articular manifestation in rheumatoid arthritis (RA); haemoglobin level changes are associated with changes in disease activity. This post-hoc analysis assessed potential relationships between haemoglobin and disease activity in Japanese patients with RA, enrolled in the KAKEHASI study (NCT02293902)., Methods: In this study, adult patients with moderate-to-severe active RA, who had an inadequate response to methotrexate, were randomised to subcutaneous sarilumab 150 mg every 2 weeks (q2w) or 200 mg q2w or placebo for 24 weeks. Post-hoc analyses were conducted on changes in haemoglobin and proportion of anaemic patients, using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures assuming an unstructured covariance. Relationships between haemoglobin and efficacy measures were explored., Results: At baseline, nearly half of patients had anaemia, defined by World Health Organization criteria (haemoglobin <12 g/dL, female; or <13 g/dL, male). At Week 24, the least squares mean change in haemoglobin levels was greater in sarilumab groups than for placebo (150 mg: 1.23 g/dL, 200 mg: 1.19 g/dL, placebo: 0.17 g/dL; p=0.0002 for both doses vs. placebo). By Week 24, the proportion of patients with anaemia was 17.8%, 22.9%, and 30.1% for sarilumab 150 mg, 200 mg, and placebo, respectively., Conclusions: In Japanese patients with RA, both doses of sarilumab were associated with greater improvement in haemoglobin levels and reduction in proportion of patients with anaemia, compared with placebo. Sarilumab may be a suitable treatment for patients with RA and anaemia.

Objectives: To report 24-week safety and effectiveness of certolizumab pegol (CZP) in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis from a post-marketing surveillance study., Methods: Enrolled patients were newly receiving CZP. All adverse events (AEs) and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were recorded for patients who received ≥1 CZP dose. Effectiveness outcomes included: 28-joint Disease Activity Score with erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) and European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) response. Missing data were imputed using the last observation carried forward., Results: 3727 patients were enrolled; safety and effectiveness were evaluated in 3586 and 1794 patients, respectively. 24.9% of patients reported AEs (893/3586), 14.7% reported ADRs (528/3586), 8.3% (298/3586) reported serious AEs and 5.3% (190/3586) reported serious ADRs. Selected serious ADRs of interest: infections (110; 3.1%), tuberculosis (6; 0.2%), interstitial pneumonia (15; 0.4%), malignancy (8; 0.2%), and hepatic function disorder (7; 0.2%). No allergic reactions, autoimmune disease, cardiac failure, demyelinating diseases, or pancytopenia were reported. Mean DAS28-ESR reduced from 4.8 (baseline) to 3.4 (final evaluation). At final evaluation, 34.7% of patients achieved EULAR good response., Conclusions: These real-world safety and effectiveness results were consistent with previously reported data, with no new safety signals identified. Long-term, real-world CZP safety and effectiveness data are needed., (© Japan College of Rheumatology 2022. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Background: Efficacy of combination therapy with methotrexate and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs is well established in the management of patients with rheumatoid arthritis; however, the optimal dose of methotrexate to administer with a tumour necrosis factor inhibitor remains unclear. We aimed to clarify the efficacy and safety of adalimumab combined with reduced methotrexate dose compared with the maximum tolerated methotrexate dose in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate monotherapy., Methods: In this open-label, randomised controlled trial, we recruited methotrexate-naive patients with rheumatoid arthritis and a disease duration of less than 2 years across 24 secondary or tertiary care hospitals across Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan. At initiation, methotrexate was given orally and increased to the maximum tolerated dose by week 12. Patients who did not achieve remission on the basis of the Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) at week 24 were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive adalimumab (40 mg biweekly) combined with a continued maximum tolerated dose of methotrexate or adalimumab combined with a reduced dose of methotrexate. The primary endpoint was non-inferiority of adalimumab plus reduced-dose methotrexate to adalimumab plus maximal-dose methotrexate based on SDAI remission at week 48, assessed in the modified full-analysis set with a pre-specified non-inferiority margin of -15%, based on a two-sided 90% CI. Adverse events were assessed in the safety analysis set. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03505008 and has been completed., Findings: From April 18, 2018, to June 2, 2020, from 323 patients screened, 300 were enrolled, and 291 patients were included in the full analysis set. The mean age was 57·7 years (SD 15·2), 217 (75%) were female, 74 (25%) were male, and all patients were of Asian ethnicity. The mean SDAI at study enrolment was 26·5 (SD 12·4). 52 patients discontinued the study before week 24 or at week 24 before randomisation. At week 24, 105 (36%) of 291 patients achieved remission and continued methotrexate monotherapy through week 48. 134 (46%) did not achieve remission at week 24 and were randomly assigned to receive adalimumab plus the maximum tolerated dose of methotrexate (n=68) or adalimumab plus reduced-dose methotrexate (n=66). Remission at week 48 was achieved in 25 (38%) of 66 and 27 (44%) of 61 patients, respectively, with an adjusted risk difference of 6·4% (90% CI -7·0 to 19·8), which met the non-inferiority margin of -15%. Adverse events after week 24 tended to be more frequent in the maximum tolerated dose group than in the reduced-dose group (24 [35%] vs 13 [20%], p=0·054). Between week 24 and 48, there were 14 serious adverse events (6 in the methotrexate monotherapy group, 5 in the adalimumab plus maximal-dose methotrexate, and 3 in the adalimumab plus reduced-dose methotrexate group), and no deaths., Interpretation: The MIRACLE study showed that the efficacy of adalimumab combined with reduced methotrexate dose was not inferior to that with the maximum tolerated methotrexate dose, with a tendency to a better safety profile., Funding: Eisai., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests HTam has received speaker honoraria from AbbVie and Eisai. KI has received grants from Mitsubishi-Tanabe Pharma, speaker honoraria from AbbVie, Eisai, Mitsubishi-Tanabe Pharma, Astellas Pharma, UCB, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Gilead Sciences, Asahi Kasei Pharma, Chugai Pharma, and Bristol-Myers Squibb. TM received grants, research support, or speaker fees from AbbVie, Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharma, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Gilead Sciences, Kirin, Pfizer, and UCB. KS has received grants, research support from Novartis, Astellas Pharma, AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Yuhan Corporation, and consulting fees from KD Bio. SH has received grants from AbbVie, Asahi Kasei Pharma, Eisai, Otsuka, Sanofi, Shionogi, Chugai, Pfizer, Mitsubishi-Tanabe Pharma, Eli Lilly, and UCB; speaker honoraria from AbbVie, Asahi Kasei Pharma, Astellas Pharma, Ayumi Pharma, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene Corporation, Chugai Pharma, Eisai, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Kyorin Pharmaceutical, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Mitsubishi-Tanabe Pharma, and UCB; paid instructor fees from AbbVie and Mitsubishi-Tanabe Pharma; and consulting fees from AbbVie, Astellas Pharma, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eisai, Gilead Sciences, and Eli Lilly. SS has received grants from Asahi Kasei Pharma, AbbVie, Chugai Pharma, Eli Lilly, Eisai, Teijin, Pfizer, Ayumi Pharma, and Daiichi Sankyo. HY has received research grants from Asahi Kasei Pharma, Mitsubishi-Tanabe Pharma, Chugai Pharma, Eisai, and Taisho Pharma; speaker fees from AbbVie, Janssen, Gilead Sciences, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, and Nippon Shinyaku. MK has received grants from Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Ono Pharma, and MBL; royalties from MBL; consulting fees from Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Mochida Pharmaceutical, and Kissei Pharmaceutical; speaker honoraria from AbbVie, Asahi Kasei Pharma, Astellas Pharma, Chugai Pharma, Nippon Shinyaku, Mitsubishi-Tanabe Pharma, and Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim. TI has received payment or honoraria from AbbVie, Asahi Kasei Pharma, Astellas Pharma, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharma, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, and GlaxoSmithKline. HK has received a research grant from AbbVie, Asahi Kasei Pharma, Boehringer, Chugai Pharma, Eisai, Mitsubishi-Tanabe Pharma, and Taisho; speaker honoraria fees from AbbVie, Asahi Kasei Pharma, Astellas Pharma, Boehringer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharma, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Mitsubishi-Tanabe Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB. TK has received grants or research support and speaker fees from AbbVie, Astellas Pharma, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharma, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Eisai, UCB, and Taisho. TTan, MM, and HM are shareholders and employees of Eisai. YS has received speaker honoraria from Eisai and Kowa Pharmaceuticals; and consulting fees from Mochida Pharmaceutical. TTak received grants from AbbVie, Asahi Kasei Pharma, Ayumi Pharma, Chugai Pharma, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Mitsubishi-Tanabe Pharma, and Ono Pharma; consulting fees from AbbVie, Chugai Pharma, Eli Lilly, and Gilead Sciences, and Mitsubishi-Tanabe Pharma; and payment or honoraria from AbbVie, Asahi Kasei Pharma, Astellas Pharma, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharma, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Mitsubishi-Tanabe Pharma, and Pfizer. YK has received grants from AbbVie, Asahi Kasei Pharma, Ayumi Pharma, Chugai Pharma, Eisai, Mitsubishi-Tanabe Pharma, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Asahi Kasei Pharma; payment or honoraria from AbbVie, Asahi Kasei Pharma, Astellas Pharma, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharma, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Mitsubishi-Tanabe Pharma, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Asahi Kasei Pharma, and Novartis. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To investigate sustained remission following the discontinuation of tofacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis., Methods: Patients who had an inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX) with or without biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs were randomly divided into two groups at baseline, and tofacitinib treatment in combination with MTX was administered to both groups. Either MTX or tofacitinib was then withdrawn if patients achieved Clinical Disease Activity Index remission at week 52. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who sustained clinical remission at week 104., Results: A total of 113 patients participated in this study. Among them, a total of 48 patients achieved remission at week 52. After discontinuation of tofacitinib, only 29.2% (7/24) of patients remained remission, while 50.0% (10/20) of patients, which was numerically higher but not statistically significant, sustained remission after MTX discontinuation. A greater proportion of bio-naïve patients achieved remission at week 52 and sustained low disease activity with tofacitinib discontinuation at week 104. Additionally, the patients who were able to discontinue tofacitinib without flares had lower rheumatoid factor (p=0.04) and lower anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody (p=0.051) before discontinuation of tofacitinib. No severe adverse events were recorded after discontinuation of tofacitinib or MTX. In patients who relapsed after tofacitinib discontinuation, 71.4% achieved remission with resumption of tofacitinib., Conclusions: This study implies that a blanket cessation of tofacitinib may not be suitable for all patients, given that 58% of the participants experienced relapse. However, the withdrawal of tofacitinib is unlikely to result in the acquisition of treatment-resistance., Competing Interests: Competing interests: SK has received consulting fees, speaking fees and/or honoraria from Eli Lilly, Bristol-Myers, GlaxoSmithKline and research grants from Daiichi-Sankyo, Abbvie, Boehringer Ingelheim and Astellas. YM has received consulting fees, speaking fees and/or honoraria from Eli Lilly and has received research grants from GlaxoSmithKline. KA has received research grants from Asahi-Kasei Pharma and speaking fees from Abbvie GK, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co, Eisai, Eli Lilly and Pfizer Japan. KM has received research grants from Asahi-Kasei Pharma and Chugai. HK has received speaking fees and/or honoraria from AbbVie, Asahi-Kasei, Bristol-Myers, Chugai, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Pfizer and UCB, and received research grants from Asahi-Kasei, Abbvie, Chugai, Eisai, Mitsubishi-Tanabe and Taisho. SN has received consulting fees, speaking fees and/or honoraria from Bristol-Myers, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, Astellas, Asahi-Kasei, Sanofi, Abbvie, Eisai, Chugai, Gilead, Boehringer Ingelheim and has received research grants from Mitsubishi-Tanabe. YK has received consulting fees, speaking fees and/or honoraria from Abbvie, Asahi Kasei, Daiichi-Sankyo, Chugai, Takeda, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Bristol-Myers, Astellas, Eisai, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Asahi-Kasei, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, UCB, and has received research grants from Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Chugai and Abbvie. KY has received consulting fees, speaking fees and/or honoraria from Pfizer, Chugai Pharma, Takeda Industrial Pharma, Astellas Pharma, Abbvie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Mitsubishi-Tanabe Pharma, GlaxoSmithKline, Eli Lilly, Janssen Pharma, Eisai Pharma, Actelion Pharmaceuticals Japan, Asahi Kasei Pharma Corp, Ono Pharma, Otsuka Pharma, Nippon Shinyaku, Gilead G.K, Daiichi Sankyo, Boehringer Ingelheim Japan, Japan Tobacco, Hisamitsu Pharma, MSD, Sanofi, AYUMI Pharma, Nippon Kayaku. YTanaka has received speaking fees and/or honoraria from Behringer-Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Abbvie, Gilead, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Pfizer, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, GlaxoSmithKline, received research grants from Asahi-Kasei, Abbvie, Chugai, Eisai, Takeda, Daiichi-Sankyo, Behringer-Ingelheim., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.)

Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib, a Janus kinase inhibitor, in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS) with an inadequate response (IR) to biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs)., Methods: Adults with active AS who met modified New York criteria and had an IR to one or two bDMARDs (tumour necrosis factor or interleukin-17 inhibitors) were randomised 1:1 to oral upadacitinib 15 mg once daily or placebo. The primary endpoint was Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society 40 (ASAS40) response at week 14. Sequentially tested secondary endpoints included Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity score, Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada MRI spine inflammation score, total back pain, nocturnal back pain, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index and Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score. Results are reported from the 14-week double-blind treatment period., Results: A total of 420 patients with active AS were randomised (upadacitinib 15 mg, n=211; placebo, n=209). Significantly more patients achieved the primary endpoint of ASAS40 at week 14 with upadacitinib vs placebo (45% vs 18%; p<0.0001). Statistically significant improvements were observed with upadacitinib vs placebo for all multiplicity-controlled secondary endpoints (p<0.0001). Adverse events were reported for 41% of upadacitinib-treated and 37% of placebo-treated patients through week 14. No events of malignancy, major adverse cardiovascular events, venous thromboembolism or deaths were reported with upadacitinib., Conclusion: Upadacitinib 15 mg was significantly more effective than placebo over 14 weeks of treatment in bDMARD-IR patients with active AS. No new safety risks were identified with upadacitinib., Trial Registration Number: NCT04169373., Competing Interests: Competing interests: DvdH has received consulting fees from AbbVie, Bayer, BMS, Cyxone, Eisai, Galapagos, Gilead, GSK, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB Pharma; is the director of Imaging Rheumatology BV; is an Associate Editor of the Annals of Rheumatic Diseases; is an editorial board member of the Journal of Rheumatology; and is an advisor for the Assessment in SpondyloArthritis international Society. XB has received grant/research support from AbbVie and Novartis; consulting fees from AbbVie, BMS, Chugai, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB; speakers’ bureau fees from AbbVie, BMS, Celgene, Chugai, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB; and is an editorial board member of the Annals of Rheumatic Diseases. JS has received grant/research support from AbbVie, Merck, and UCB; has been a consultant for AbbVie, Merck, Novartis, and UCB; and has served on the speakers’ bureau for AbbVie, Merck, and Novartis. AD has received grant/research support from AbbVie, BMS, Celgene, GSK, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB; and honoraria or consultation fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Aurinia, BMS, Celgene, GSK, Janssen, Lilly, MoonLake, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB. RDI has received grant/research support from AbbVie, Amgen, Janssen, and Novartis; and has been a consultant for AbbVie, Amgen, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, and Sandoz. HK has received grant/research support from AbbVie, Asahi-Kasei, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai, Eisai, and Mitsubishi-Tanabe; consulting fees from AbbVie, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Sanofi, and UCB; and received speakers’ bureau fees from AbbVie, Asahi-Kasei, BMS, Chugai, Eisai, Janssen, Lilly, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Novartis, and Pfizer. XZ has none declared. YS, XB, PW and I-HS are employees of AbbVie and may own stock or options. ALP is a former employee of AbbVie and may own stock or options., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objectives: To describe the immunogenicity profile of sarilumab in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA)., Methods: Patients enrolled in the KAKEHASI and HARUKA studies were included in our analysis. In these studies, patients received sarilumab 150 mg or 200 mg every 2 weeks for 52 or 28 weeks in combination with methotrexate (MTX) (KAKEHASI), or for 52 weeks as monotherapy or in combination with non-MTX conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (HARUKA). Anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) and neutralising antibodies (NAbs) were assessed in the pooled population., Results: Positive ADA assay responses occurred in 10/149 (7.1%) patients treated with sarilumab 150 mg and 13/185 (7.0%) patients treated with sarilumab 200 mg, with persistent responses in 2 (1.4%) and 4 (2.2%) patients, respectively. Peak ADA titre was 30. No patients treated with the 150 mg dose and one patient (0.5%) treated with the 200 mg dose exhibited NAbs. There was no evidence of an association between ADA formation and hypersensitivity reactions or reduced efficacy., Conclusions: ADAs, which occurred at a low frequency and titre, did not affect the safety or efficacy of sarilumab 150 or 200 mg administered as monotherapy or combination therapy in Japanese patients with RA in the KAKEHASI or HARUKA studies., (© Japan College of Rheumatology 2021. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Objective: Sarilumab, as monotherapy or in combination with conventional synthetic DMARDs, such as MTX, has demonstrated improvement in clinical outcomes in patients with RA. The primary objective of this post hoc analysis was to compare the efficacy of sarilumab (200 mg every 2 weeks) monotherapy (MONARCH study) with that of sarilumab and MTX combination therapy (MOBILITY study) at week 24., Methods: The endpoints assessed were mean change from baseline in the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), 28-joint Disease Activity using CRP (DAS28-CRP), CRP, haemoglobin (Hb), pain visual analogue scale (VAS) and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue. Least square (LS) mean change from baseline (95% CI) at week 24 for all endpoints was compared between the treatment arms for adjusted comparisons., Results: This analysis included 184 patients on sarilumab monotherapy and 399 patients on sarilumab plus MTX. Differences (P < 0.05) were observed in ethnicity, region, body mass index group, rheumatoid factor, anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies, swollen joint count, CRP, CDAI and oral glucocorticoid use between these treatment groups. After adjusting for these differences in a mixed-effect model repeated measure, LS mean change from baseline for all assessments was similar between the treatment groups with overlapping CIs: CDAI, -28.79 vs -26.21; DAS28-CRP, -2.95 vs -2.81; CRP, -18.31 vs -16.46; Hb, 6.59 vs 8.09; Pain VAS, -33.62 vs -31.66; FACIT-Fatigue, 9.90 vs 10.24., Conclusion: This analysis demonstrated that the efficacy of sarilumab monotherapy was similar to that of sarilumab and MTX combination therapy., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology.)

Objectives: Methotrexate (MTX) is used as an anchor drug in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), although more than a half of the patients with RA require additional treatments. We designed a prospective study involving two medical centers in Japan to examine the association between the expression of MTX-related genes including a drug transporter ATP-binding cassette sub-family G member 2 (ABCG2) gene and the clinical response to MTX in MTX-naive patients with RA., Methods: The primary endpoint of this study was good response based on the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria by Disease Activity Score using 28-joint count (DAS28). We evaluated the association between the baseline expression of six genes involved in the intracellular pharmacokinetics of MTX, including ABCG2, as well as their temporal changes, and the clinical response at week 12 from the initiation of MTX., Results: Based on the clinical response at 12 weeks after the initiation of MTX, 24 patients were classified into good responders ( n  = 9) and non-good responders ( n  = 15; 10 moderate responders and 5 non-responders) groups. A univariate logistic regression analysis of the baseline gene expression levels to predict the EULAR good response at week 12 showed a significant association with ABCG2 expression alone. Furthermore, the rate of baseline expression of ABCG2 mRNA above the cut-off value determined using a receiver operating characteristic curve was higher in good responders than in non-good responders ( p  = .012). Moreover, ABCG2 expression decreased in almost all good responders, but not in non-good responders, after MTX treatment for 12 weeks (median -76% vs. +41% from baseline, respectively; p  = .011). The ABCG2 expression level did not correlate with DAS28 at baseline or week 12., Conclusions: Our study revealed that good response to MTX is associated with a decrease in the expression of ABCG2 in patients with RA.

Objective: To evaluate the effect of withdrawing ixekizumab in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in whom minimal disease activity (MDA) has been achieved after open-label ixekizumab treatment., Methods: SPIRIT-P3 was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind withdrawal study of biologic treatment-naive adult patients with PsA who were treated with open-label ixekizumab for 36 weeks (160 mg at week 0, then 80 mg every 2 weeks). Patients in whom MDA was sustained for >3 consecutive months were randomized 1:1, between weeks 36 and 64, to undergo blinded withdrawal of ixekizumab treatment (placebo) or to continue ixekizumab treatment every 2 weeks up to week 104. The primary efficacy end point was time to relapse (loss of MDA) for randomized patients. Patients who experienced a relapse were re-treated with ixekizumab every 2 weeks up to week 104., Results: A total of 394 patients were enrolled and received open-label ixekizumab every 2 weeks. Of those patients, 158 (40%) achieved sustained MDA and were randomized to undergo withdrawal of ixekizumab treatment (placebo every 2 weeks; n = 79) or to continue ixekizumab treatment every 2 weeks (n = 79). Disease relapse occurred more rapidly with treatment withdrawal (median 22.3 weeks [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 16.1-28.3]) compared to those who continued treatment with ixekizumab (median not estimable; P < 0.0001). Sixty-seven patients (85%) compared to 30 patients (38%) experienced relapse in the placebo group and the continued treatment group, respectively. Median time to achieving MDA again with re-treatment was 4.1 weeks (95% CI 4.1-4.3); in 64 of 67 patients (96%) who experienced relapse with treatment withdrawal, MDA was achieved again with re-treatment. Safety was consistent with the known safety profile for ixekizumab., Conclusion: Continued ixekizumab therapy is superior to ixekizumab withdrawal in maintaining low disease activity in biologic treatment-naive patients with PsA. Re-treatment with ixekizumab following a relapse may restore disease control in cases of treatment interruption., (© 2021 Eli Lilly and Company. Arthritis & Rheumatology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Rheumatology.)

Introduction: Upadacitinib is a Janus kinase inhibitor with demonstrated efficacy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA)., Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the long-term safety of upadacitinib in patients with active RA from Japan compared with global clinical trial populations., Methods: Pooled data in patients enrolled from Japan (the 'Japanese population'; SELECT-SUNRISE, SELECT-EARLY, and SELECT-MONOTHERAPY) were compared with that from global (Japan and ex-Japan) upadacitinib clinical trial populations and summarized descriptively., Results: The Japanese population (mean age 57.0 years; mean RA duration 6.1 years) received upadacitinib 7.5 mg (n = 121), 15 mg (n = 126), and 30 mg (n = 124) once daily, while the global population (mean age 54.8 years; mean RA duration 9.1 years) received upadacitinib 6 mg twice daily/15 mg once daily (n = 2883) and 12 mg twice daily/30 mg once daily (n = 1375). Most patients were female (79.3%). The exposure-adjusted incidence rates (EAIRs) of serious adverse events in the Japanese population were 11.5, 12.2, and 21.2 per 100 patient-years (PY) with upadacitinib 7.5, 15, and 30 mg, respectively. Herpes zoster rates were higher in the Japanese population (7.8, 12.4, and 16.7 per 100 PY with 7.5, 15, and 30 mg, respectively) versus global populations (3.7 and 7.0 per 100 PY with 15 and 30 mg, respectively). Prior herpes zoster was a significant risk factor for herpes zoster., Conclusions: The safety profile of upadacitinib was generally similar between Japanese and global RA populations, except for higher EAIRs for serious adverse events and infections, including herpes zoster, in the Japanese population., Trial Registration Numbers: SELECT-EARLY: NCT02706873; SELECT-NEXT: NCT02675426; SELECT-COMPARE: NCT02629159; SELECT-MONOTHERAPY: NCT02706951; SELECT-BEYOND: NCT02706847; SELECT-SUNRISE: NCT02720523; BALANCE I: NCT01960855; BALANCE II: NCT02066389.

To elucidate the disease-flare process in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) after discontinuing biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs), we first focused on RA-flare prediction after achieving stringent remission criteria. Patients with RA who maintained a simplified disease activity index ≤ 3.3 for ≥ 3 months during November 2014-January 2018 in our medical centre in Tokyo, Japan, were eligible. The primary endpoint was flare (disease activity score 28-erythrocyte sedimentation rate ≥ 3.2 with increase from baseline > 0.6) within 2 years after bDMARD discontinuation. Comprehensive clinical assessments, ultrasonographic evaluation of 40 joints, and blood sampling for 12 biomarkers were performed every 2-3 months for 2 years unless patients experienced flare. Flare-positive and flare-negative patients were compared using univariate and Kaplan-Meier analyses. Thirty-six patients (80.6% female, median disease duration, 5.2 years; median treatment period with discontinued bDMARD, 2 years; median remission duration, 18 months) were enrolled. Twenty patients (55.6%) experienced RA flare 43-651 (median, 115) days after the first skipped date of bDMARDs. Two patients who withdrew without disease flare were excluded from the comparison. Clinical and ultrasonographic evaluations did not show significant between-group differences; Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that higher baseline soluble tumour necrosis factor receptor 1 (sTNFR1) concentration impacted subsequent disease flare (p = 0.0041); higher baseline interleukin (IL)-2 concentration was exclusively beneficial to patients with lower sTNFR1 (p = 0.0058), resulting in remission maintenance in 83.3% of patients with lower sTNFR1 and higher IL-2. We demonstrated the usefulness of combined biomarker evaluation for predicting sustained remission after bDMARD discontinuation in RA.

Background: The objective of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib over 84 weeks in Japanese patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and an inadequate response to conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs., Methods: All patients completing a 12-week, randomized, double-blind treatment period entered a blinded extension and continued upadacitinib 7.5, 15, or 30 mg once daily (QD), or were switched from placebo to upadacitinib 7.5, 15, or 30 mg QD. Efficacy and safety were assessed over 84 weeks., Results: Of 197 randomized patients, 187 (94.9%) completed the 12-week period and entered the blinded extension; 152 (77.2%) patients were ongoing at week 84. At week 84, the proportions of patients achieving a 20% improvement in American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR20) were 85.7%, 77.6%, and 58.0% with continued upadacitinib 7.5, 15, and 30 mg, respectively (nonresponder imputation), and were similar in patients who had switched from placebo. Favorable response rates were also observed for more stringent measures of response (ACR50/70) and remission (defined by the Disease Activity Score of 28 joints with C-reactive protein, Clinical Disease Activity Index, or Simplified Disease Activity Index). The 15 mg and 30 mg doses of upadacitinib were associated with more rapid and numerically higher initial responses for some measures of disease activity and remission compared with the 7.5 mg dose. Rates of adverse events, infection, opportunistic infection, serious infection, and herpes zoster were lower with upadacitinib 7.5 and 15 mg versus 30 mg., Conclusions: Upadacitinib demonstrated sustained efficacy and was well tolerated over 84 weeks in Japanese patients with RA, with upadacitinib 15 mg offering the most favorable benefit-risk profile., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02720523 . Registered on March 22, 2016.

Objective: To report the primary (1-year) results from PREVENT, the first phase III study evaluating secukinumab in patients with active nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis (SpA)., Methods: A total of 555 patients were randomized (1:1:1) to receive subcutaneous secukinumab 150 mg with a loading dose (loading dose [LD] group), secukinumab 150 mg without a loading dose (non-loading dose [NL] group), or placebo weekly and then every 4 weeks starting at week 4. The NL group received placebo at weeks 1, 2, and 3 to maintain blinding. Switch to open-label secukinumab or standard of care was permitted after week 20. The study had 2 independent analysis plans, per European Union and non-US (plan A; week 16) and US (plan B; week 52) regulatory requirements. The primary end point was 40% improvement in disease activity according to the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS40) criteria at week 16 (in the LD group) and at week 52 (in the NL group) in tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi)-naive patients. Safety analyses included all patients who received ≥1 dose of study treatment., Results: Overall, 481 patients completed 52 weeks of treatment, including 84.3% (156 of 185) in the LD group, 89.7% (165 of 184) in the NL group, and 86.0% (160 of 186) in the placebo group. The proportion of patients who switched to open-label or standard of care between weeks 20 and 48 was 50.8% in the LD group, 47.3% in the NL group, and 64.0% in the placebo group. Both primary and all secondary end points were met at week 16. The proportion of TNFi-naive patients who met ASAS40 was significantly higher for LD at week 16 (41.5%) and NL at week 52 (39.8%) versus placebo (29.2% at week 16 and 19.9% at week 52; both P < 0.05). No new safety findings were reported., Conclusion: Our findings indicate that secukinumab 150 mg provides significant and sustained improvement in signs and symptoms of nonradiographic axial SpA through 52 weeks. Safety was consistent with previous reports., (© 2020 The Authors. Arthritis & Rheumatology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Rheumatology.)

Objectives: We evaluated long-term control of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Japanese paid workers (PWs) and house workers (HWs) treated with subcutaneous tocilizumab (TCZ-SC) and explored factors affecting response to TCZ-SC regarding work productivity., Methods: This study collected data from patients with RA in the TCZ-SC +/- conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs group. Factors affecting the response to tocilizumab regarding work productivity were explored using logistic regression. Differences in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) between with/without response were analysed by a linear regression., Results: Data were analysed for 357/360 patients. Patients with a ≥ 75% improvement in activity impairment (AI) were considered responders. EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D), six-item Kessler psychological distress scale score (K6), Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI), and the patient's disease global health by visual analogue scale were significant contributors to TCZ-SC response based on improvements in AI. Work Functioning Impairment Scale, presenteeism, EQ-5D, K6, and HAQ-DI significantly contributed to the improvement of overall work impairment in PWs. Shorter disease duration also was related to TCZ-SC response based on AI improvements. Responders had significantly larger mean QALYs than non-responders (difference = 0.2614; p  < .001)., Conclusions: These real-world clinical data support long-term work productivity control with TCZ-SC for biologic-naïve HWs and PWs with RA.

Aim: PF-06438179/GP1111 (PF-SZ-IFX) is a biosimilar of reference infliximab (Remicade ® ). This analysis compared the efficacy of PF-SZ-IFX and reference infliximab sourced from the European Union (IFX-EU) in patient subgroups from a randomized, comparative study of PF-SZ-IFX versus IFX-EU., Methods: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis were randomized 1:1 to PF-SZ-IFX (n = 324) or IFX-EU (n = 326); study drug (3 mg/kg) was administered intravenously at weeks 0, 2, and 6, then every 8 weeks thereafter. Subgroup analyses of efficacy endpoints such as American College of Rheumatology criteria for ≥20% clinical improvement (ACR20), change in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), and change in Disease Activity Score in 28 joints, four components based on hs-CRP (DAS28-CRP) at weeks 14 and 30 were performed by age, gender, race, region, immunogenicity status, and treatment history., Results: Overall, ACR20 response rates as well as changes in DAS28-CRP and hs-CRP at week 14 were similar between PF-SZ-IFX and IFX-EU within the subgroups of age, gender, race, region, treatment history, and immunogenicity status. Results to week 30 support overall similarity in efficacy between the two treatment arms in all subgroups., Conclusion: Overall, PF-SZ-IFX and IFX-EU were similar in efficacy within the analyzed subgroups of age, gender, race, region, treatment history, and immunogenicity status. The efficacy results from these subgroup analyses were aligned with the previously described results for the overall population up to week 30., (© 2020 The Authors. International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases published by Asia Pacific League of Associations for Rheumatology.)

Objective: Our objective was to evaluate the long-term efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of the infliximab biosimilar, PF-06438179/GP1111 (PF-SZ-IFX), in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who continued biosimilar treatment throughout 78 weeks or who switched from reference infliximab (Remicade ® ) sourced from the EU (IFX-EU) at week 30 or week 54 in the REFLECTIONS B537-02 study., Methods: In this phase III, double-blind, active-controlled study, patients with moderate-to-severe active RA were initially randomized to PF-SZ-IFX or IFX-EU, each with methotrexate (treatment period [TP] 1; N = 650). At week 30, patients receiving PF-SZ-IFX continued PF-SZ-IFX; patients receiving IFX-EU were re-randomized to continue IFX-EU or switch to PF-SZ-IFX (TP2; n = 566). From weeks 54 to 78, all patients received open-label treatment with PF-SZ-IFX (TP3; n = 505). Efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity data were analyzed during TP3., Results: Efficacy was sustained and comparable across groups at week 78, with American College of Rheumatology criteria for ≥ 20% clinical improvement response rates of 75.9% (biosimilar group), 77.8% (week 30 switch group), and 68.3% (week 54 switch group). The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was 28.9%, 29.4%, and 30.2%, respectively. The proportion of patients who were antidrug antibody (ADA) positive and neutralizing antibody positive (as a percentage of ADA-positive patients) was stable and comparable between groups., Conclusions: Results to week 78 continue to support the efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of PF-SZ-IFX in patients with moderate-to-severe active RA. There were no clinically meaningful differences between groups, independent of a single treatment transition from IFX-EU to PF-SZ-IFX at week 30 or week 54., Trial Registration Number: NCT02222493.

Objectives: To determine long-term safety and efficacy of sarilumab as monotherapy or with non-methotrexate (MTX) conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) in Japanese patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods: In this double-blind, randomized study (NCT02373202), patients received subcutaneous sarilumab 150 mg q2w (S150) or 200 mg q2w (S200) as monotherapy or with non-MTX csDMARDs for 52 weeks. The primary endpoint was safety. Results: Sixty-one patients received monotherapy (S150, n  = 30; S200, n  = 31) and 30 received combination therapy (S150 + csDMARDs, n  = 15; S200 + csDMARDs, n  = 15). Rates of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were 83.3%/90.3%/93.3%/86.7% for S150/S200/S150 + csDMARDs/S200 + csDMARDs, respectively. Nasopharyngitis and neutropenia were the most frequently reported TEAEs. One serious infection was reported in each monotherapy group and in the S200 + csDMARDs group. There were no cases of grade 4 neutropenia; no patients with grade 3 neutropenia experienced associated serious infection. Improvements in ACR20/50/70 response rates were generally similar between the two monotherapy groups and between the two combination groups; improvements in physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index, HAQ-DI) and DAS28-CRP were observed at weeks 24 and 52 (all groups). Conclusion: The safety profile of sarilumab was consistent with known class effects of interleukin-6 signaling blockade therapeutics. Sarilumab as mono- or combination therapy improved clinical signs/symptoms and physical function in Japanese RA patients.

Background: The long-term safety was assessed in patients with psoriatic arthritis who were treated with ixekizumab in three clinical trials (SPIRIT-P1/-P2/-P3)., Methods: Integrated safety data from three trials (controlled and uncontrolled), including two pivotal phase 3, randomized, double-blind clinical trials: SPIRIT-P1 and SPIRIT-P2, were assessed. Safety data were integrated from the all ixekizumab exposure safety population (defined as all patients receiving ≥ 1 dose of ixekizumab). We report exposure-adjusted incidence rates (IRs) per 100 patient-years (PY) at 1-year intervals up to 3 years for adverse events., Results: Total exposure to IXE reached 1822.2 PY (1118 patients). The IRs/100 PY for the following treatment discontinuations were as follows: adverse events (5.3); serious infections (1.3); injection-site reactions (12.7); infections (34.2); and deaths (0.3). The IRs for treatment-emergent adverse events decreased or remained stable over time, the most common being upper respiratory tract infection, nasopharyngitis, and injection-site reactions. The IRs for serious adverse events and serious infections remained stable over time, whereas for injection-site reactions and general infections, IRs decreased with longer ixekizumab exposure. Opportunistic infections were limited to oral and esophageal candida and localized herpes zoster. No suicide or self-injury-related behaviors were reported. The IRs/100 PY for safety topics of special interest included inflammatory bowel disease (adjudicated; 0.1), depression (1.6), malignancies (0.7), and major adverse cardiovascular events (0.6)., Conclusions: The findings of this integrated safety analysis in patients with psoriatic arthritis are consistent with the known safety profile of ixekizumab. No unexpected safety signals were observed with ixekizumab treatment in patients with psoriatic arthritis., Trial Registration: SPIRIT-P1 (NCT01695239; Registered August 08, 2012), SPIRIT-P2 (NCT02349295; September 23, 2014), and SPIRIT-P3 (NCT02584855; August 04, 2015).

Objective: To investigate the efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of PF-06438179/GP1111 (PF-SZ-IFX) compared with European reference infliximab (Remicade ® ; ref-IFX) in patients with moderate-to-severe, active rheumatoid arthritis after continued long-term use of PF-SZ-IFX, and in patients who were switched from ref-IFX to PF-SZ-IFX., Methods: REFLECTIONS B537-02 was a double-blind, active-controlled, multinational study in which patients (N=650) were initially randomised to PF-SZ-IFX or ref-IFX for 30 weeks (treatment period [TP] 1). During weeks 30-54 (TP2), the PF-SZ-IFX group (n=280) continued treatment with PF-SZ-IFX (PF-SZ-IFX/PF-SZ-IFX) and patients in the ref-IFX group (n=286) were rerandomised (1:1) to continue ref-IFX (ref-IFX/ref-IFX) (n=143) or switch to PF-SZ-IFX (ref-IFX/PF-SZ-IFX) (n=143) for a further 24 weeks. Efficacy, safety, immunogenicity and pharmacokinetics were evaluated., Results: During TP2, patients in all three treatment groups continued to maintain comparable treatment response. At week 54, the American College of Rheumatology (ACR20) response rates were 71.1% (PF-SZ-IFX/PF-SZ-IFX), 64.3% (ref-IFX/ref-IFX) and 70.6% (ref-IFX/PF-SZ-IFX). Observations for other endpoints, including ACR50/70, Disease Activity Score in 28 Joints Based on High-Sensitivity C Reactive Protein(DAS28-CRP) remission, and mean change in DAS28-CRP and Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index, were also comparable. Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 36.8% (PF-SZ-IFX/PF-SZ-IFX), 33.6% (ref-IFX/ref-IFX) and 37.8% (ref-IFX/PF-SZ-IFX) of patients; there were no clinically meaningful differences in the safety profiles between groups. The percentage of patients who were antidrug antibody-positive was generally stable through the treatment period and comparable overall between the PF-SZ-IFX/PF-SZ-IFX (52.1%; neutralising: 80.8%), ref-IFX/ref-IFX (60.1%; neutralising: 84.9%) and ref-IFX/PF-SZ-IFX (58.0%; neutralising 78.3%) groups., Conclusions: The similar efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of PF-SZ-IFX compared with ref-IFX were maintained for up to 54 weeks and were not affected by blinded treatment switch from ref-IFX to PF-SZ-IFX at week 30., Trial Registration Number: NCT02222493., Competing Interests: Competing interests: RA has received honoraria and research grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Roche and Pfizer. BB has received consulting fees, speaking fees and honoraria from Pfizer and Sandoz. TH has declared no conflicts of interest. HK has received consulting fees, speaking fees and/or honoraria from Asahi Kasei Pharma, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly Japan KK, Janssen Pharmaceutical KK, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Novartis Pharma KK and Pfizer Japan, and research grants from AbbVie GK, Asahi Kasei Pharma, Astellas Pharma, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eisai, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Novartis Pharma KK, Sanofi Pharma and UCB Japan. SCR has received research grants and consulting fees, speaking fees and/or honoraria from Pfizer. VT has no conflicts of interest. GB was an employee of Hexal (a Sandoz company) at the time of writing this manuscript. OvR is an employee of Hexal (a Sandoz company). CC, SH, MR and MZ are employees of Pfizer. SC has received consulting fees from Amgen, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Coherus, Merck, Pfizer and Sandoz and has received research grants from Amgen, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Coherus, Merck and Pfizer.

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab, an interleukin-6 receptor antibody, in patients with adult-onset Still's disease., Methods: In this double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase III trial, 27 patients with adult-onset Still's disease refractory to glucocorticoids were randomised to tocilizumab at a dose of 8 mg/kg or placebo given intravenously every 2 weeks during the 12-week, double-blind phase. Patients received open-label tocilizumab for 40 weeks subsequently. The primary outcome was American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 50 response at week 4. The secondary outcomes included ACR 20/50/70, systemic feature score, glucocorticoid dose and adverse events at each point., Results: In the full analysis set, ACR50 response at week 4 was achieved in 61.5% (95% CI 31.6 to 86.1) in the tocilizumab group and 30.8% (95% CI 9.1 to 61.4) in the placebo group (p=0.24). The least squares means for change in systemic feature score at week 12 were -4.1 in the tocilizumab group and -2.3 in the placebo group (p=0.003). The dose of glucocorticoids at week 12 decreased by 46.2% in the tocilizumab group and 21.0% in the placebo group (p=0.017). At week 52, the rates of ACR20, ACR50 and ACR70 were 84.6%, 84.6% and 61.5%, respectively, in both groups. Serious adverse events in all participants who received one dose of tocilizumab were infections, aseptic necrosis in the hips, exacerbation of adult-onset Still's disease, drug eruption and anaphylactic shock., Conclusion: The study suggests that tocilizumab is effective in adult-onset Still's disease, although the primary endpoint was not met and solid conclusion was not drawn., Competing Interests: Competing interests: YK has received grants or speaking fees from AbbVie, Astellas, Ayumi, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Hisamitsu, Janssen, Kissei, Pfizer, Sanofi, Takeda, Mitsubishi-Tanabe and UCB. HK has received grants or speaking fees from AbbVie, Ayumi, Chugai, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Astellas, Takeda, Eisai, Novartis, Sanofi, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer and Janssen. KI has received grants or speaking fees from Tanabe-Mitsubishi Pharma, AbbVie, Bristol-Myers KK, Eisai, UCB, Pfizer Japan, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly, Astellas Pharma, Chugai Pharmaceutical and Kyowa Hakko Kirin. IT has received grants or speaking fees from Chugai, Ono, Pfizer, Mitsubishi-Tanabe and Astellas. KM has received grants or speaking fees from AbbVie, Chugai, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Astellas, Takeda, Eisai, UCB, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer and Janssen. HT has received grants or speaking fees from Pfizer, Daiichi Sankyo and Mitsubishi-Tanabe. YT has received grants or speaking fees from Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Takeda, Bristol-Myers, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Astellas Pharma, AbbVie, MSD, Eli Lilly, YL Biologics, Daiichi Sankyo, Sanofi, Janssen, Pfizer, Kyowa Kirin, Eisai and Ono. HT and TA have nothing to declare. TT has received research grants or speaking fees from Astellas Pharma, Bristol-Myers KK, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Daiichi Sankyo, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Teijin Pharma, AbbVie GK, Asahi Kasei Pharma, Mitsubishi-Tanabe Pharma, AstraZeneca KK, Eli Lilly Japan KK, Novartis Pharma KK, AbbVie GK, Nippon Kayaku, Janssen Pharmaceutical KK, Taiho Pharmaceutical and Pfizer Japan., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objectives: The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of subcutaneous tocilizumab (TCZ-SC) in a real-world clinical setting in Japan., Methods: This single arm, 26-week prospective observational study enrolled patients with RA who were either TCZ naïve or switched from TCZ-IV to TCZ-SC (TCZ-IV-SC group) (UMIN Clinical Trials Registry UMIN000011102). All patients received TCZ-SC 162 mg every 2 weeks and data were collected until week 26 or discontinuation., Results: Overall 784 (78.1%) were TCZ naïve and 219 (21.8%) were in the TCZ-IV-SC group. 70.9% received disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs at baseline. Adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs occurred in 28.2% and 4.9% of patients, respectively (TCZ-naïve: 29.5% and 5.2%; TCZ-IV-SC: 23.2% and 4.1%). Infections and infestations were the most common AEs (7.4%) and serious AEs (1.7%). Two TCZ-naïve patients died. TCZ-naïve patients had an improvement in median Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) score and mean Disease Activity Score in 28 joints as measured by erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) from baseline to week 26. The TCZ-IV-SC group had similar median CDAI scores and mean DAS28-ESR over 26 weeks., Conclusions: There were no unexpected safety signals with TCZ-SC. TCZ-SC was effective in reducing disease activity in TCZ-naïve patients and maintaining remission in TCZ-IV-SC patients.

Background: This double-blind, active-controlled, randomized, multinational study evaluated the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and immunogenicity of PF-06438179/GP1111 (IxifiTM/Zessly®), an infliximab biosimilar, vs infliximab (Remicade®) reference product sourced from the European Union (infliximab-EU) in biologic-naïve patients with moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) despite methotrexate therapy. This paper reports results from the initial 30-week treatment period., Methods: Patients (N = 650) were stratified by geographic region and randomized 1:1 to PF-06438179/GP1111 or infliximab-EU (3 mg/kg intravenous at weeks 0, 2, and 6, then every 8 weeks). Dose escalation to 5 mg/kg was allowed starting at week 14 for patients with inadequate RA response. The primary endpoint was American College of Rheumatology criteria for ≥ 20% clinical improvement (ACR20) response at week 14. Therapeutic equivalence was declared if the two-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference was within the symmetric equivalence margin of ± 13.5%. Statistical analysis was also performed with a two-sided 90% CI using an asymmetric equivalence margin (- 12.0%, 15.0%)., Results: Patients (80.3% female; 79.4% seropositive) had a mean RA duration of 6.9 years, and mean baseline Disease Activity Score in 28 joints, four components based on C-reactive protein was 6.0 in both arms. Week 14 ACR20 in the intention-to-treat population was 62.7% for PF-06438179/GP1111 and 64.1% for infliximab-EU. Week 14 ACR20 using nonresponder imputation was 61.1% for PF-06438179/GP1111 and 63.5% for infliximab-EU, and the 95% (- 9.92%, 5.11%) and 90% (- 8.75%, 4.02%) CIs for the treatment difference (- 2.39%) were entirely contained within the prespecified symmetric and asymmetric equivalence margins, respectively. No differences were observed between arms for secondary efficacy endpoints. Overall postdose antidrug antibody (ADA) rates through week 30 were 48.6% and 51.2% for PF-06438179/GP1111 and infliximab-EU, respectively. Efficacy and immunogenicity were similar between treatments for patients with dose escalation (at or after week 14), as well as between treatments for patients without dose escalation. Safety profiles of PF-06438179/GP1111 and infliximab-EU were similar, with no clinically meaningful differences observed between arms, including after ADA development. Serum drug concentrations were similar between arms at each time point during the initial 30-week treatment period., Conclusion: PF-06438179/GP1111 and infliximab-EU demonstrated similar efficacy, safety, immunogenicity, and PK with or without dose escalation in patients with moderate to severe active RA on background methotrexate., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02222493 . Registered on 21 August 2014. EudraCT, 2013-004148-49 . Registered on 14 July 2014.

Background: Following the onset of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), patients experience a functional decline caused by various joint symptoms which affects their activities of daily living and can lead to reduced work productivity. We evaluated the effect of a 52-week treatment with tocilizumab by subcutaneous injection (TCZ-SC) among biologic-naive Japanese house workers (HWs) and paid workers (PWs) with RA in a real-world clinical practice., Methods: This multicenter, observational, prospective study enrolled 377 and 347 RA patients into TCZ-SC and conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs)-alone groups, respectively. The primary endpoint was the change in percentage of overall work impairment (OWI) among PWs at week 52 assessed using the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI). Inverse probability of treatment weighting analyses were used to compare treatments. The Work Functioning Impairment Scale, disease activity, quality of life (QOL) measures, and safety were also assessed., Results: The weighted change in OWI from baseline for PWs was -18.9% (TCZ-SC group) and -19.0% (csDMARDs group) at week 52, without a significant between-group difference (adjusted treatment difference 0.1, 95% confidence interval (CI) -6.3 to 6.5; P = 0.978). Changes in WPAI activity impairment in the overall group (between-group difference -6.4, 95% CI -10.7 to -2.2; P = 0.003) and HWs (-9.5, 95% CI - 16.0 to -2.9; P = 0.005) were significantly better with TCZ-SC than with csDMARDs at week 52. TCZ-SC-treated HWs showed significant improvement in all QOL assessments (Frenchay Activities Index, EuroQol 5 Dimension (EQ-5D), Japanese Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI), and 6-item Kessler scale (K6)) at week 52; PWs did not show any between-group differences for these QOL measures. Disease activity (Disease Activity Score 28-erythrocyte sedimentation rate, Clinical Disease Activity Index, and Simplified Disease Activity Index) and QOL measures (EQ-5D, HAQ-DI, and K6) improved over time in the overall group. No new safety concerns were raised with TCZ-SC., Conclusions: Despite the lack of differences in OWI between groups at week 52, the overall group (particularly HWs) receiving TCZ-SC in addition to csDMARDs showed significant improvements in activity impairment, disease activity, and QOL versus those receiving csDMARDs alone. This study may promote the evaluation of work productivity improvements in HWs and PWs by RA treatment.

As of February 2018, 5 originator TNF inhibitors(infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab, golimumab and certolizumab pegol)and biosimilar agents of infliximab and etanercept are available for rheumatoid arthritis(RA)in Japan. The effectiveness of TNF inhibitors considerably improves with concomitant methotrexate regardless of their immunogenicity. The Japan College of Rheumatology guideline for TNF inhibitor use in RA has been updated in March 2017 according to recent evidences. During the remission induction phase, maintenance of drug trough level above effective blood concentration is paramount, while the tapering and withdrawal of TNF inhibitors may be considered after achieving sustained remission.

Objective: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of certolizumab pegol (CZP) in a real-world setting among Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis., Methods: Post-marketing surveillance data from 2,579 patients treated with CZP were analyzed. Adverse events (AEs) observed during the 24-week CZP treatment period were recorded. Disease activity was evaluated using DAS28-ESR and DAS28-CRP at baseline, Week 12, Week 24, or at withdrawal., Results: The total period of exposure to CZP was 1313.8 patient-years (PY). AEs were reported in 658 (25.5%) patients, at an event rate (ER) of 73.68/100 PY. The most frequent serious AEs were pneumonia, herpes zoster, and interstitial lung disease, at ER per 100 PY of 2.06, 1.29, and 1.22, respectively. Mean disease activity scores at baseline, as measured by DAS28-ESR and DAS28-CRP, were 4.77 ± 1.34 and 4.21 ± 1.27, respectively. Mean changes from baseline at the last observation were -1.29 ± 1.46 and -1.30 ± 1.42, respectively. EULAR good or moderate responses were achieved in 65% of patients. Longer disease duration, prior biologics use, and treatment without MTX co-therapy were associated with EULAR no response., Conclusion: In this interim analysis, no new safety signals were observed. Clinical response to CZP was observed in approximately two thirds of patients.

Background: According to EULAR recommendations, biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) such as tumor necrosis factor inhibitor, tocilizumab (TCZ), and abatacept (ABT) are in parallel when prescribing to rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients who have shown insufficient response to conventional synthetic DMARDs. However, most prediction studies of therapeutic response to bDMARDs using gene expression profiles were focused on a single bDMARD, and consideration of the results from the perspective of RA pathophysiology was insufficient. The aim of this study was to identify the specific molecular biological features predicting the therapeutic outcomes of three bDMARDs (infliximab [IFX], TCZ, and ABT) by studying blood gene expression signatures of patients before biologic treatment in a unified test platform., Methods: RA patients who responded inadequately to methotrexate and were later commenced on any one of IFX (n = 140), TCZ (n = 38), or ABT (n = 31) as their first biologic between May 2007 and November 2011 were enrolled. Whole-blood gene expression data were obtained before biologic administration. Patients were categorized into remission (REM) and nonremission (NON-REM) groups according to CDAI at 6 months of biologic therapy. We employed Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) to identify functional gene sets differentially expressed between these two groups for each biologic. Then, we compiled "signature scores" for these gene sets, and the prediction performances were assessed., Results: GSEA showed that inflammasome genes were significantly upregulated with IFX in the NON-REM group compared with the REM group. With TCZ in the REM group, B-cell-specifically expressed genes were upregulated. RNA elongation, apoptosis-related, and NK-cell-specifically expressed genes were upregulated with ABT in the NON-REM group. Logistic regression analyses showed that "signature scores" of inflammasomes, B-cell-specifically expressed, and NK-cell-specifically expressed genes were significant, independently predictive factors for treatment outcome with IFX, TCZ, and ABT, respectively. The AUCs of ROC curves of these signature scores were 0.637, 0.796, and 0.768 for IFX, TCZ, and ABT, respectively., Conclusions: We have identified original gene expression predictive signatures uniquely underlying the therapeutic effects of IFX, TCZ, and ABT. This is, to our knowledge, the first attempt to predict therapeutic effects of three drugs concomitantly using a unified gene expression test platform.

As of January 2016, 5 originator TNF inhibitors (infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab, golimumab and certolizumab pegol) and an infliximab biosimilar are available for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Japan. The efficacy and effectiveness of TNF inhibitors improve with concomitant methotrexate even for the least immunogenic agent. The Japan College of Rheumatology guideline for TNF inhibitor use in RA has been updated in March 2015, including recent evidences of effectiveness and safety partly from the postmarketing surveillance data in Japan. During the remission induction phase, maintenance of drug trough level above effective blood concentration is paramount, while the tapering and withdrawal of TNF inhibitors may be considered after achieving sustained remission.

Objectives: To investigate the clinical effectiveness of tocilizumab (TCZ), a monoclonal antibody against the interleukin-6 receptor, in preventing relapse in patients with adult-onset Still's disease (AOSD)., Methods: This retrospective study included clinical data from 40 patients who underwent regular follow-up at our institution in June 2013. Among these patients, 10 received TCZ. The relapse-free rate was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method., Results: The age at disease onset (median, interquartile range [IQR]) was 39 (29-52) years. The duration of disease in June 2013 (median, IQR) was 86 (41-193) months. A total of 87 relapses were documented in 27 patients. Ten patients with refractory or relapsing disease received 8 mg/kg of TCZ every 2-4 weeks. After 6 months of TCZ treatment, the median levels of C-reactive protein significantly decreased from 6.3 to 0.01 mg/dl (p < 0.01). Among these 10 patients, 11 relapses were observed before TCZ treatment, and none were observed after the treatment. The relapse-free rate of the 10 patients after starting TCZ was significantly higher than that of all 40 patients after the initial treatments (100% and 67% at 12 months, respectively; p = 0.03)., Conclusions: TCZ effectively prevented relapses of AOSD, and it resolved the disease activity.

Objectives: To explore the effectiveness and safety of tocilizumab (TCZ) with or without methotrexate (MTX) in active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients showing inadequate responses to DMARDs and/or TNF inhibitors in clinical practice., Methods: We observed consecutive 115 RA patients initiating TCZ treatment in Keio University Hospital, dividing them into two groups with (TCZ + MTX group) or without MTX (TCZ group), and evaluated clinical, functional and structural outcomes besides safety at week 52., Results: Overall mean age, RA duration, and DAS28-ESR were 55.4, 8.4 years, and 5.0, respectively. Proportions of the prior use of TNF inhibitors and concomitant MTX were 45.5% and 57.4%, respectively. Mean dose of concomitant MTX was 8.4 mg/week. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the groups. TCZ improved disease activity measured by DAS28-ESR to 2.1 at week 52 overall, without significant difference between the groups. Clinical (DAS28-ESR < 2.6), functional (HAQ-DI ≤ 0.5), and structural (ΔTSS ≤ 0.5) remission rates in the TCZ group and the TCZ + MTX group were 79.1%/63.8% (P = 0.10), 62.8%/54.4% (P = 0.40), and 70.0%/53.8% (P = 0.61), respectively. Retention rates were 81.0% in the TCZ + MTX group and 88.5% in the TCZ group (P = 0.47). The rate of serious adverse events was comparable between the groups., Conclusions: TCZ was clinically, functionally, and radiographically effective and safe either with or without low-dose MTX.

Objectives: We examined whether the addition of another conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) to methotrexate (MTX) upon infliximab (IFX) discontinuation in well-controlled rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients could suppress subsequent disease flare., Methods: RA patients maintaining DAS28-CRP (Disease Activity Score of 28 joints with C-reactive protein) scores < 2.6 for ≥ 6 months with IFX were randomized either to receive addition of bucillamine (BUC) to MTX (BUC + MTX group; n = 24) or not (MTX group; n = 31) upon discontinuing IFX. The primary endpoint was the flare rate within 2 years of IFX discontinuation., Results: Six patients discontinuing MTX during the study were excluded from analyses. Seventeen patients (63.0%) experienced flares in the MTX group, which was significantly reduced in the BUC + MTX group (31.8%; p = 0.045). Further, the flare rates differed significantly between remission and non-remission by a Boolean definition upon IFX discontinuation in the MTX group (40.0% vs. 91.7%, respectively; p = 0.014), but they were comparable in the BUC + MTX group. BUC treatment was interrupted in seven patients due to rash, proteinuria and incompliance., Conclusions: DMARDs combination therapy may be a better treatment strategy than MTX monotherapy for maintaining RA control after successful discontinuation of biological agents.

Objectives: To examine the effectiveness of tocilizumab (TCZ) in preventing joint destruction in patients with inadequate response to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNF-IR) by assessing X-rays., Methods: RA patients were extracted from the Retrospective actemra investigation for optimal needs of RA patients (REACTION) study. Parameters and components of disease activity were evaluated during anti-TNF treatment and during TCZ treatment. X-ray images of hands and feet at the beginning of this study during anti-TNF treatment (Pre), at the start point of TCZ treatment (Baseline) and after TCZ treatment (Post) were collected for assessing joint destruction., Results: Forty-five patients from the REACTION study fulfilled the criteria of clinical TNF-IR. During anti-TNF treatment, mean DAS28-ESR rose from 5.35 to 5.87 (mean observation duration, 16 months) but improved significantly to 2.94 (P < 0.0001) at 52 weeks after switching to TCZ. Mean change in van der Heijde-modified Sharp score (TSS) during anti-TNF treatment was 3.17 in this TNF-IR population. After switching to TCZ, mean change in TSS was 1.20 (P < 0.05). Rate of radiographic non-progression improved to 66.7% during TCZ treatment from 40.0% during anti-TNF treatment. The predictive factor for no radiographic progression after switching to TCZ was a HAQ disability index (HAQ-DI) score of ≤ 1.88 at switching to TCZ., Conclusion: TCZ was a good treatment option for improving signs and symptoms and inhibiting progression of joint damage in patients with clinical and structural TNF-IR.

Objective: To determine the effect of methotrexate (MTX) on plasma levels of interleukin (IL)-6 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and to investigate their associations with clinical and radiographic responses in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA)., Methods: Sixty-two untreated RA patients with the disease duration of ≤36 months in whom MTX was initiated were consecutively identified in our prospective RA cohort and included in this study. Concomitant use of prednisolone and synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs with MTX was allowed, but patients who used biological agents were excluded. Plasma IL-6 and TNF-α levels were measured at the time of diagnosis (baseline) and 1 year later. The relationships of the clinical and radiographic data with plasma levels of IL-6 and TNF-α were analyzed., Results: The median age of the patients was 57 years, 49 patients were female, and the median disease duration was 3 months. Forty-six (74.2 %) patients were anti-cyclic citrullinated protein antibody-positive. Serum C-reactive protein (CRP), plasma IL-6, and DAS28 decreased significantly (p <0.001) after MTX treatment, but plasma TNF-α did not. Radiographic progression was significantly correlated with disease activity score and plasma IL-6 levels but not with CRP or TNF-α after MTX treatment. Patients with plasma IL-6 level above 4.03 pg/ml showed clinically relevant radiographic progression with a sensitivity of 91.7 % and a specificity of 88.0 %., Conclusion: In this early RA cohort, we demonstrated a significant (p <0.001) reduction of plasma IL-6, but not TNF-α, during MTX treatment. The post-treatment IL-6 level was a strong indicator of radiographic progression.

Pharmacological management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has been rapidly progressed in recent years, which is appeared in the "treat to target" movement and the recommendations developed by some established international/domestic rheumatology associations. The baseline evaluation of poor prognostic factors as well as disease activity with composite measures is necessary for a personalized management. Methotrexate is currently the anchor drug, and other conventional or biological antirheumatic drugs should be added to it for refractory patients. The development of various novel agents including signal transduction inhibitors should promote further advances in the management of RA and other systemic autoimmune and/or inflammatory diseases.

Etanercept (ETN) is a fusion protein of the receptor (CD120b) for tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and the Fc portion of IgG1. A phase III trail and the JESMR study, both performed in Japan, implicated the importance of concomitant methotrexate (MTX) use in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Further evidences, including the TEAR study and the PRESERVE study, supported the recent treatment strategy for RA, being divided into at least two phases: remission induction phase(step-up or initial combination) and its maintenance phase (step-down). Thus, optimization of RA treatment chiefly based on MTX and anti-TNF biological agents is in progress.

Objective: The associations between elevated levels of serum Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) and treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors were investigated in five Japanese clinical trials., Methods: Percentages and incidence rates were calculated for elevated serum KL-6 levels. Adverse events associated with elevated levels of serum KL-6 were investigated., Results: In RISING, a clinical trial for infliximab, 15.6 % of the enrolled patients met criterion B (KL-6 ≥500 U/ml and >1.5-fold increase over the baseline value) by week 54. In HIKARI, 7.8 % of the certolizumab pegol (CZP) group and 0 % of the placebo group met criterion B during the double-blind (DB) period (p = 0.003). In J-RAPID, 8.4 % of the methotrexate (MTX) + CZP and 3.9 % of the MTX + placebo groups met criterion B during the DB period. In GO-MONO, 1.8 % of the golimumab (GLM) and 1.3 % of the placebo groups met criterion B during the DB period. In GO-FORTH, 7.1 % of the MTX + GLM and 0 % of the MTX + placebo groups met criteron B during the DB period (p = 0.017). No adverse events accompanied the elevation of serum KL-6 levels in 95.7 % of these patients., Conclusion: Serum KL-6 levels may increase during anti-TNF therapy without significant clinical events. In these patients, continuing treatment with TNF inhibitors under careful observation is a reasonable option.

Objective: We investigated associations between treatment with methotrexate (MTX) or biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and elevation of serum Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) levels in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA)., Methods: Using a standardized form, data were collected retrospectively from medical records and analyzed descriptively., Results: Of a total of 198 RA patients with KL-6 serum levels measured at initiation of treatment (month 0) and two or more times by month 12, 27 (17.9 %) of 151 RA patients treated with biological DMARDs, including infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab, and tocilizumab (the biological DMARDs group), and 5 (10.6 %) of 47 patients treated without biological DMARDs but with MTX (MTX group), met criterion B (max. KL-6 ≥500 U/ml and >1.5-fold from baseline) by 12 months. The majority of patients (n = 28) meeting criterion B had no apparent interstitial lung disease or malignancy. Of these 28 patients, 21 had serum KL-6 levels available after reaching their maximum level, and 13 (61.9 %) of the 21 then met criterion R [decrease to less than 500 U/ml or to less than (baseline + 0.5 × (maximum - baseline))] by month 12., Conclusion: Serum KL-6 levels may increase during treatment with MTX or these biological DMARDs without significant clinical events.

We retrospectively investigated the ability of adalimumab (ADA) to reduce disease activity, improve physical function, and retard the progression of structural damage in 167 patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clinical and functional outcomes were compared between patients with or without prior biologic treatment and those with or without concomitant methotrexate (MTX) treatment. At week 52, 38.3% achieved clinical remission: 42.4 and 28.6% of patients achieved remission in those without and with previous biologics, respectively, while 42.7 and 12.5% of patients achieved remission in those with and without concomitant MTX, respectively. ADA treatment significantly reduced the rate of radiographic progression from 27.1 ± 46.0 (median 13.6; 25th-75th percentiles 8.3 to 28.9) at baseline to 0.8 ± 5.0 (median 0.0; 25th-75th percentiles -0.9 to 2.0) at week 52 (P < 0.0001). Radiographic progression was absent in 59.8% of patients. Sixty adverse events (34.21/100 patient-years) were reported, 16 of which were serious (9.12/100 patient-years). ADA therapy is highly effective for reducing disease activity, improving physical function, and limiting radiographic progression. It is generally safe and well tolerated by Japanese RA patients in routine clinical practice.

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors have produced improvements in clinical, radiographic, and functional outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. However, it remains unclear whether factors affecting physical functions remain following TNF therapy. The objective of our study was to assess factors affecting improvement of physical functions and to shed light on relations to disease activity and structural changes in patients with RA treated with etanercept. The study enrolled 208 patients, all of whose composite measures regarding clinical, radiographic, and functional estimation both at 0 and 52 weeks after etanercept therapy were completed. Mean disease duration of 208 patients was 9.6 years, mean Disease Activity Score for 28 joints (DAS28) was 5.4, and mean van der Heijde modified total Sharp score (mTSS) was 94.6. Mean Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) improved from 1.4 at 0 weeks to 1.0 at 52 weeks after etanercept therapy, a 31% reduction, which was much less than changes in DAS28 and mTSS. By multivariate analysis, HAQ-DI and mTSS at baseline were significantly correlated HAQ remission. Median HAQ-DI improved in 100 versus 20% of the HAQ-DI ≤ 0.6 versus ≥ 2.0 groups, respectively. The mTSS cutoff point at baseline to obtain HAQ remission was 55.5. During etanercept treatment in the mTSS <55.5 versus >55.5 groups, median HAQ-DI improved in 70 versus 39%; remission was achieved in 59 versus 33%; and there was no improvement in 14 versus 30%, respectively. HAQ-DI improvement was significantly correlated with that of DAS28 but not of mTSS. In conclusion, higher HAQ and mTSS at baseline inhibits HAQ-DI improvement within 1 year of etanercept treatment, and the cutoff point necessary for mTSS to improve physical functions in patients with RA was 55.5.

Adult-onset Still's disease (AOSD) is a systemic inflammatory disease of unknown etiology. Recently, it has been reported that quite a few cases of refractory AOSD were successfully treated with tocilizumab (TCZ) and corticosteroids were withdrawn in some of these patients. We report two AOSD patients who were treated successfully with TCZ monotherapy; thus, avoiding corticosteroid treatment. Because both of the patients refused to take corticosteroids, we planned to treat them with 8 mg/kg of TCZ monotherapy at weeks 0, 2, 6 and subsequently every 4 weeks. The efficacy of TCZ was assessed by patients' clinical symptoms such as fever, arthralgia, skin eruptions, and laboratory markers such as serum levels of CRP, ferritin, and IL-6. We also reviewed 14 previous case reports including 30 cases who had been treated with TCZ for AOSD. Our patients responded rapidly and have been maintained in clinical remission without corticosteroid treatment. In the literature review, concomitant corticosteroid treatment described in 13 cases was successfully tapered in 7 and discontinued in 6 cases. TCZ monotherapy can be a candidate for the first-line therapy for some AOSD patients.

Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of tocilizumab in RA patients in clinical practice., Methods: We observed 232 consecutive RA patients who began tocilizumab in three rheumatology centres in Japan for 52 weeks. Clinical, radiographic and functional status and safety were evaluated., Results: Mean age of the 232 patients was 59.1 years, mean duration of disease was 12.4 years and average DAS using the 28-joint count (DAS-28) was 5.6. Although 62.8% of the patients had been treated previously with anti-TNF biologics, clinical remission at Week 52 was achieved in 43.7%, radiographic non-progression in 62.8% and functional remission in 26.4%. Retention rate at Week 52 was 71.1%, and the same for those with or without previous anti-TNF treatment. Adverse drug reactions leading to tocilizumab discontinuation were observed in 15.5% of patients, the most frequent adverse drug reaction being pneumonia in eight cases. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, DAS-28, HAQ-disability index (HAQ-DI), concomitant MTX and concomitant glucocorticoids (GCs) were predictive variables for clinical remission at Week 52 of tocilizumab treatment. In particular, HAQ-DI was found to be a predictive variable for remission of all three types-clinical, radiographic and functional-at Week 52 of tocilizumab treatment., Conclusions: In daily clinical practice, tocilizumab exhibited excellent effectiveness in established RA patients, some of whom had failed to respond to previous anti-TNF treatment. Although further detailed safety findings are required, this study provides valuable real-world findings on the management of RA with tocilizumab.

Objective: The aim of the Efficacy and Safety of Etanercept on Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Despite Methotrexate Therapy in Japan (JESMR) study is to compare the efficacy of continuation versus discontinuation of methotrexate (MTX) when starting etanercept (ETN) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA)., Methods: In total, 151 patients with active RA who had been taking MTX were randomized to either ETN 25 mg twice a week with 6-8 mg/week MTX (the E+M group), or ETN alone (the E group). The primary endpoint at Week 52 was the radiographic progression assessed by van der Heijde-modified Sharp score., Results: The mean progression in total score at Week 52 was not significantly different, statistically, between the E+M group and the E group (0.8 vs 3.6, respectively; p = 0.06). However, a significant difference was observed in radiographic progression between Weeks 24 and 52 (0.3 vs 2.5; p = 0.03), and the mean progression of the erosion score was negative in the E+M group, which was significantly better than the E group at Week 52 (-0.2 vs 1.8; p = 0.02). Clinically, the cumulative probability plot of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR)-N values at Week 52 clearly demonstrated a superior response in the E+M group than in the E group. ACR20, 50, and 70 response rates at Week 52 in the E+M group (86.3%, 76.7%, and 50.7%) were significantly greater than those in the E group (63.8%; p = 0.003, 43.5%; p < 0.0001 and 29.0%; p = 0.01, respectively)., Conclusion: MTX should be continued when starting ETN in patients with active RA. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00688103).

Tocilizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody to the interleukin 6 (IL-6) receptor, was approved for use as rheumatoid arthritis (RA) therapy in Japan in 2008, but its efficacy and tolerability in daily practice has not yet been reported. We report the results of a multicenter retrospective study on the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab involving all patients (n = 229) who were started on tocilizumab therapy at three rheumatology institutes in Japan from April 2008 through to March 2009. Tocilizumab was infused every 4 weeks at a dose of 8 mg/kg according to the drug labeling. Among the 229 patients, 55% concomitantly received methotrexate (MTX) and 63% had previously received anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy. Average disease activity score (DAS) 28 of all 229 patients significantly decreased from 5.70 to 3.25 after 24 weeks of therapy. A European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) good response and DAS28 remission was achieved in 57.4 and 40.7% of the patients, respectively, at 24 weeks. White blood cell counts significantly decreased and liver enzymes and total cholesterol slightly but significantly increased; however, liver enzyme levels did not increase in patients without MTX. Tocilizumab was discontinued in 47 cases (20.5%) due to lack of efficacy (5.2%), adverse events (11.4%), and other reasons (3.9%). The overall retention rate at 24 weeks was 79.5%. Based on these results, we conclude that tocilizumab therapy in daily rheumatology practice appears to be highly efficacious and well tolerated among active RA patients, including the anti-TNF therapy-refractory population. Tocilizumab infusion is therefore applicable not only as an alternative approach for anti-TNF therapy-resistant patients, but also as primary biologic therapy for active RA patients.