Search

Background: Agranulocytosis is a life-threatening side-effect of clozapine, the only approved drug for treatment-resistant schizophrenia. The long-term profile of this complication has not yet been well established. Here we aim to describe the risk of clozapine-induced agranulocytosis over the long term., Methods: We used the entire population of Finland to identify people diagnosed with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder between 1972 and 2014 and developed a Kaplan-Meier model of time to diagnosis of agranulocytosis during clozapine versus non-clozapine treatment over a 22-year observation period (1996 to 2017). Next, we developed a nested case-control model for agranulocytosis matching by sex, age, time since diagnosis, and being in the incident cohort on a 1 to 5 ratio. Various durations of use for clozapine and non-clozapine antipsychotic treatment were compared to the modal antipsychotic use duration, deriving adjusted odds ratios (aORs) in a multivariable regression model. Recurrence and lethality rates for clozapine-induced agranulocytosis were described. These data reflect on all individuals with lived experience of schizophrenia in Finland during the study time, although individuals with lived experience were not included in the design of the study., Findings: We identified 61 769 people with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder (14 037 individuals treated with clozapine and 47 732 individuals treated with non-clozapine antipsychotics), with a mean age of 46·67 years (IQR 34·44-57·61), of whom 30 721 (49·7%) were female and 31 048 (50·3%) were male (data on ethnicity not available). Among those, 398 individuals were diagnosed with agranulocytosis (231 individuals treated with clozapine and 167 individuals treated with non-clozapine antipsychotics), representing a cumulative incidence of agranulocytosis for 1·37% (95% CI 0·58-3·16) on clozapine and 0·13% (0·04-0·23) on non-clozapine antipsychotics. In the case (n=398) versus control (n=1987) model, the risk of clozapine-induced agranulocytosis decreased steeply over time from an aOR of 36·01 (95% CI 16·79-77·22) for less than 6 months on clozapine to 4·38 (1·86-10·34) for clozapine use of 54 months or more. Only one of 3559 individuals starting clozapine died because of clozapine-induced agranulocytosis., Interpretation: The risk of clozapine-induced agranulocytosis decreases steeply over time but might be persistently greater than that of non-clozapine antipsychotics. This long-term risk excess seems small in absolute terms compared with the known magnitude of the advantages of clozapine in relevant outcomes, including life expectancy. Given the widespread underuse of clozapine, relaxing the long-term neutrophil monitoring could favour the advantages of long-term clozapine use, including greater life expectancy, without incurring the intolerable risk of clozapine-induced agranulocytosis., Funding: Northwell Health and Sigrid Jusèlius Foundation., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests JMR has received honoraria from Teva, Karuna, and Janssen; royalties from UpToDate; and grant support from Saladax and Alkermes. JMK has received consulting fees or honoraria for lectures from Alkermes, Allergan, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cerevel, Click Therapeutics, Dainippon Sumitomo, H Lundbeck, Health Rhythms, HLS Therapeutics, Indivior, Intracellular Therapies, Janssen, Johnson and Johnson, Karuna, LB Pharmaceuticals, Merck, Minerva, Newron, Novartis, NW PharmaTech, Otsuka, Roche, Saladax, Sunovion, and Teva; grant support from Click Therapeutics, H Lundbeck, Janssen, Otsuka, Saladax, Sunovion, and Valera; and is a stockholder for Cerevel, Health Rhythms, Karuna, LB Pharmaceuticals, North Shore Therapies, and the Vanguard Research Group. JT, HT, and AT have participated in research projects funded by grants from Janssen-Cilag and Eli Lilly paid to their institution. JT has been a consultant or advisor to or has received honoraria from Eli Lilly, Evidera, Janssen-Cilag, Lundbeck, Orion, Otsuka, Mediuutiset, Sidera, and Sunovion. HT has received personal fees from Janssen-Cilag and Otsuka., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Objective: Identification of robust biomarkers that predict individualized response to antipsychotic treatment at the early stage of psychotic disorders remains a challenge in precision psychiatry. The aim of this study was to investigate whether any functional connectome-based neural traits could serve as such a biomarker., Methods: In a discovery sample, 49 patients with first-episode psychosis received multi-paradigm fMRI scans at baseline and were clinically followed up for 12 weeks under antipsychotic monotherapies. Treatment response was evaluated at the individual level based on the psychosis score of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. Cross-paradigm connectivity and connectome-based predictive modeling were employed to train a predictive model that uses baseline connectomic measures to predict individualized change rates of psychosis scores, with model performance evaluated as the Pearson correlations between the predicted change rates and the observed change rates, based on cross-validation. The model generalizability was further examined in an independent validation sample of 24 patients in a similar design., Results: The results revealed a paradigm-independent connectomic trait that significantly predicted individualized treatment outcome in both the discovery sample (predicted-versus-observed r=0.41) and the validation sample (predicted-versus-observed r=0.47, mean squared error=0.019). Features that positively predicted psychosis change rates primarily involved connections related to the cerebellar-cortical circuitry, and features that negatively predicted psychosis change rates were chiefly connections within the cortical cognitive systems., Conclusions: This study discovers and validates a connectome-based functional signature as a promising early predictor for individualized response to antipsychotic treatment in first-episode psychosis, thus highlighting the potential clinical value of this biomarker in precision psychiatry., Competing Interests: Dr. Gallego has served as a speaker for Tecnoquimicas. Dr. Rubio has served as a consultant for Janssen, Karuna, and TEVA, has received research funding from Alkermes, and has received royalties from UpToDate. Dr. Birnbaum has served as a consultant for Northshore Therapeutics and HearMe. Dr. Robinson has served as a consultant for Acadia, Advocates for Human Potential, Amalyx, APA, C4 Innovations, Costello Medical Consulting, Health Analytics, Innovative Science Solutions, Janssen, Lundbeck, Neurocrine, Neuronix, Otsuka, Teva, and US WorldMeds and has received grant support from Otsuka. Dr. Malhotra has served as a consultant for Acadia Pharma, Clarivate, Genomind, Health Advances, InformedDNA, Iqvia, and Janssen Pharma. The other authors report no financial relationships with commercial interests.

This study was designed to assess healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs in patients with newly diagnosed schizophrenia based on timing and context of long-acting injectable antipsychotic agent (LAI) initiation. Using claims data, patients (aged 18-40 years) with first schizophrenia diagnosis January 2013-September 2019 (index date), no LAI or oral antipsychotic agent claims during 12-month preindex period, and continuous benefit enrollment from 12 months before index date to 12 months after first LAI administration were identified. Patients were grouped based on timing [early (≤1 year after index date) vs. late] and circumstances [reactive (after schizophrenia-related event) vs. proactive] of LAI initiation. Of 1290 patients with at least one LAI claim, 306 met criteria for early ( n = 204; reactive, n = 107; proactive, n = 97) and late ( n = 102; n = 75; n = 27) initiation. HCRU and costs were numerically lower in early versus late groups, and significantly lower for proactive initiation in both groups. Comparing worst-case (late-reactive) and best-case (early-proactive) scenarios, the average annual cost difference was $7195.13 ( P = 0.0233), with major drivers being emergency department ($171.28; P < 0.05) and other outpatient ($2845.73; P < 0.00001) visits. In addition to the clinical advantages previously described in the literature, the proactive use of LAIs in early-phase schizophrenia is associated with lower healthcare costs., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Objective: Long-acting injectable antipsychotic agents (LAIs) are effective in schizophrenia relapse prevention but are often underutilized. This study aims to understand treatment patterns leading to a successful LAI implementation following schizophrenia diagnosis in a large dataset that included commercially insured patients in the United States., Methods: Patients aged 18-40 years with a first schizophrenia diagnosis (per ICD-9 or ICD-10 criteria), successful second-generation LAI implementation (defined a priori as ≥ 90 consecutive days of use), and ≥ 1 second-generation oral antipsychotic agent (OA) were identified from IBM MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental databases from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2019. Outcomes were measured descriptively., Results: Of 41,391 patients with newly diagnosed schizophrenia, 1,836 (4%) received ≥ 1 LAI; 202 (< 1%) met eligibility criteria of successful LAI implementation following ≥ 1 second-generation OA. Median (range) time between diagnosis and first LAI was 289.5 (0-2,171) days, time between LAI initiation and successful implementation was 90.0 (90-1,061) days, and time to LAI discontinuation after successful implementation was 166.5 (91-799) days. Before LAI initiation, 58% received ≥ 2 OAs. For 86% with successful LAI implementation, the implementation was accomplished with the first LAI., Conclusions: In this dataset of mainly commercially insured patients, LAI use in early-phase schizophrenia was very low (4%). For the majority for whom a LAI was successfully implemented per a priori definition, the implementation was accomplished with the first LAI and in a short period of time (90 days). However, even when LAIs were used in early-phase schizophrenia, they were generally not the first therapy, as most patients had several prior OA treatments., (© Copyright 2023 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.)

Objective: Long-acting injectable antipsychotic agents (LAIs) have improved clinical effectiveness and adherence versus oral antipsychotic agents (OAs); however, a minority of individuals with schizophrenia are treated with LAIs compared with OAs. This cohort study aimed to evaluate predictors of initiation of atypical LAIs among patients with newly diagnosed schizophrenia in the United States., Methods: Using claims data from IBM MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental databases between January 1, 2013, and March 31, 2020, adults with first diagnosis of schizophrenia, ≥ 1 OA claim following diagnosis, and continuous benefits were identified. To evaluate predictors of LAI initiation, a Cox proportional hazard regression model per independent predictors and main outcome (ie, LAI initiation) was performed., Results: Of 3,639 patients with early-phase schizophrenia, 369 (10%) had ≥ 1 LAI claim(s) after ≥ 1 OA claim(s). Several factors present prior to LAI initiation were significantly ( P  < .0001) predictive of LAI initiation: greater monthly OA switches (hazard ratio [95% CI]: 11.39 [7.01-18.51]), unsuccessful OA implementation (3.09 [2.39-3.98]), greater monthly schizophrenia-related hospitalizations (20.83 [14.22-30.51]), and greater monthly schizophrenia-related emergency department visits (4.13 [2.07-8.22])., Conclusions: In this analysis of pharmacy claims records for patients with early-phase schizophrenia, results suggest that LAIs are used less frequently in the early phase than reported in later stages. Their initiation is often reactive to relapse or disease exacerbation, rather than proactive as a relapse-prevention tool for early-phase schizophrenia. These data highlight the underuse of LAIs, particularly in the early phase when they could make the most difference., (© Copyright 2023 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.)

Most individuals with psychotic disorders relapse over their course of illness, yet the neural processes that may lead to symptom worsening are poorly understood. Importantly, such processes could be potentially affected by antipsychotic adherence status upon relapse (i.e., relapse despite ongoing antipsychotic maintenance vs following antipsychotic discontinuation), reflecting distinct mechanisms. As a first foray into this question, we aim to compare the striatal connectivity index (SCI), a biomarker derived from striatal resting state functional connectivity predictive of treatment response, by adherence status upon relapse. In order to confirm adherence status upon relapse, we compared individuals treated with long-acting injectable antipsychotics upon relapse (i.e., breakthrough psychosis) (n = 23), with individuals who had decided to interrupt antipsychotic treatment and then relapsed (n = 27), as well as healthy controls (n = 26). We acquired for each individual >10 min of resting state fMRI, to generate functional connectivity maps. Region of interest (ROI) analyses were conducted to calculate SCI values for each participant. These values were entered as dependent variable in a linear regression adjusted for sex and age for which adherence status was the independent variable. Individuals in the breakthrough psychosis group had significantly lower SCI values than healthy controls (Cohen's d = 0.99, p < 0.001), and non-adherent individuals upon relapse (Cohen's d = 0.58, p = 0.032), whereas non-adherent individuals had also trend level lower SCI values than healthy controls (Cohen's d = 0.44, p = 0.09). These results suggest the hypothesis that striatal functional connectivity may be aberrant in psychosis relapse, and that this dysfunction may be greater among individuals who developed relapse despite ongoing antipsychotic treatment., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To quantify the risk and predictors of relapse among individuals with schizophrenia randomly withdrawn from antipsychotic maintenance treatment., Methods: We re-analyzed time-to-event and baseline predictors from placebo arms in five placebo-controlled randomized trials of antipsychotics (n = 688 individuals; 173 stabilized on oral antipsychotic [OAP] and 515 on long-acting injectables [LAI]) for relapse-prevention available in the Yale Open Data Access repository. Using a survival and Cox-proportional hazards regression analyses, we estimated survival rates of "relapse-free" individuals by the end of follow-up (median = 118 days, IQR = 52.0-208.0), the rate of study-confirmed relapse, and adjusted hazard ratios (aHR, 95% confidence intervals [CI]) associated with baseline predictors. We also estimated these parameters for individuals followed for >5 half-lives of the stabilizing antipsychotic, and studied predictors of "rebound psychosis" in OAP-stabilized participants, defined as occurring within 30 days of antipsychotic withdrawal., Results: 29.9% (95%CI = 23.2-38.5) remained relapse-free by the end of follow-up, 11.1% (95%CI = 5.65-21.9) among those OAP-stabilized, 36.4% (95%CI = 28.4-46.7) among those LAI-stabilized. The study-confirmed relapse rate was 45.2%, 62.4% among those OAP-stabilized and 39.4% among those LAI-stabilized. Predictors of relapse included smoking (aHR = 1.54, 95%CI = 1.19-2.00), female sex (aHR = 1.37, 95%CI = 1.08-1.79), and having been stabilized on OAPs vs LAIs (aHR = 3.56, 95%CI = 2.68-4.72). Greater risk of relapse on OAP persisted even after sufficient time had elapsed to clear antipsychotic plasma level among LAI-stabilized (aHR = 5.0, 95%CI = 3.5-7.1). "Rebound psychosis" did not show predictors., Conclusions and Relevance: Our results corroborate the high relapse risk following antipsychotic withdrawal after symptom stabilization with limited patient-related predictors of safe treatment discontinuation. Stabilization with LAIs reduces the short-/medium-term relapse risk., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Maryland Psychiatric Research Center. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Introduction: Long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) are associated with multiple positive outcomes in psychosis, but it is unclear whether LAIs are associated with worse outcomes if neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS), a potentially lethal adverse effect, occurs., Methods: We used nationwide and nationally representative databases of healthcare encounters in Finland to study the incidence and outcome predictors of NMS in patients diagnosed with schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder between January 01, 1972 and December 31, 2017. Using a nested case-control design, we also explored differences by antipsychotic formulation (LAI vs oral antipsychotic [OAP]) and class (first-generation antipsychotic [FGA] vs second-generation antipsychotic [SGA])., Results: One hundred seventy-two NMS cases and 1441 sex-, age-, and diagnosis-matched controls were included (age = 58.8 ± 13.1 years, males = 59.9%). Incidence of NMS was 1.99 (1.98-2.00) per 10 000 person-years. The likelihood of developing NMS did not differ by antipsychotic formulation (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.89, 95% confidence intervals [95% CI]: 0.59-1.33, for LAIs vs OAPs) or class (FGA-OAP vs SGA-OAP [aOR: 1.08, 95% CI: 0.66-1.76], FGA-LAI [aOR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.52-1.53], SGA-LAI [aOR: 1.35, 95% CI: 0.58-3.12]). NMS risk factors included antipsychotic treatment change: increased number (odds ratios [OR]: 5.00, 95% CI: 2.56-9.73); decreased number/switch (OR: 2.43, 95% CI: 1.19-4.96); higher antipsychotic dose (>2DDDs-OR: 3.15, 95% CI: 1.61-6.18); co-treatment with anticholinergics (OR: 2.26, 95% CI: 1.57-3.24), lithium (OR: 2.16, 95% CI: 1.30-3.58), benzodiazepines (OR: 2.02, 95% CI: 1.44-3.58); and comorbid cardiovascular disease (OR: 1.73, 95% CI: 1.22-2.45). Within 30 days, 4.7% of cases with NMS died (15.1% within 1 year) without differences by antipsychotic formulation. NMS reoccurred in 5 of 119 subjects (4.2%), after a median = 795 (range = 77-839) days after rechallenge with antipsychotics., Conclusion: NMS remains a potentially life-threatening risk, yet these results should further contribute to mitigate concerns about LAI safety regarding NMS onset or outcomes, including mortality., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Maryland Psychiatric Research Center. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Schizophrenia often requires long-term treatment with antipsychotic medication. This study aims to measure the continuity of antipsychotic treatment over the course of illness in schizophrenia, as well as factors involved in the interruption of treatment. For this, we followed up a national cohort of first-episode psychosis patients in Finland for up to 18 years. Stratified Cox proportional hazards regressions were conducted for "within-participant" risk of discontinuation of subsequent treatments compared to the first, and by specific antipsychotic compared to oral olanzapine, the most prescribed antipsychotic in this cohort. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated. Among 3343 participants followed up for a mean of 8 years (SD = 4.93), the median number of continuous treatment episodes was 6 (interquartile range [IQR] = 3-11) with a median duration of 11.4 months (IQR = 5.3-25.6). In the first year after diagnosis, the incidence rate of treatment discontinuation was 30.12 (95% CI = 29.89-30.35) events per 100 participant-years, decreasing to 8.90 (95% CI = 8.75-9.05) in the 10th year. The risk of discontinuation progressively decreased over successive treatment episodes (aHR = 0.30; 95% CI = 0.20-0.46 for episodes after the 15th compared to the first). Individuals were 67% less likely to interrupt treatment with long-acting injectable than oral antipsychotics (aHR = 0.33; 95% CI = 0.27-0.41). Treatment for schizophrenia over the long term is often characterized by recurrent cycles of interruptions and reintroductions of antipsychotic medication, which is typically not recommended by management guidelines. Greater utilization of long-acting injectable formulations earlier in the course of illness may facilitate the continuity of antipsychotic treatment in schizophrenia., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Maryland Psychiatric Research Center.All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objective: Neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) is a potentially fatal, idiosyncratic reaction to antipsychotics. Due to low incidence of NMS, research on risk factors of mortality associated with NMS is limited., Methods: Two authors independently searched Medline/Embase/Cochrane/CINAHL/PsychINFO databases for case reports with author-defined NMS published in English until 05/30/2020. Demographic, clinical, treatment, and outcome data were independently extracted following PRISMA guidelines. NMS severity was rated using the Francis-Yacoub scale. Mortality risk factors were identified using a multivariable regression analysis including all characteristics that were significantly different between NMS cases resulting vs. not resulting in death., Results: 683 cases with NMS were analyzed (median age = 36 years, males = 62.1%). In a multivariable model, independent predictors of NMS mortality were lack of antipsychotic discontinuation (odds ratio (OR) = 4.39 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.14-8.99; p < 0.0001), respiratory problems (OR = 3.54 95%CI = 1.71-7.32; p = 0.0004), severity of hyperthermia (Unit-OR = 1.30, 95%CI = 1.16-1.46; p < 0.0001), and older age (Unit-OR = 1.05, 95%CI = 1.02-1.07; p = 0.0014). Even in univariate, patient-level analyses, antipsychotic formulation was not related to death (oral antipsychotic (OAP): n = 39/554 (7.0%) vs. long-acting injectable (LAI): n = 13/129 (10.1%); p = 0.2413). Similarly, death with NMS was not related to antipsychotic class (first-generation antipsychotic: n = 38/433 (8.8%) vs. second-generation antipsychotic: n = 8/180 (4.4%); p = 0.0638). Non-antipsychotic co-treatments were not associated with NMS mortality., Conclusion: Despite reliance on case reports, these findings indicate that presence of respiratory alterations, severity of hyperthermia, and older age should alert clinicians to a higher NMS mortality risk, and that antipsychotics should be stopped to reduce mortality, yet when NMS arises on LAIs, mortality is not increased vs. OAPs., (© 2021 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: The drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome is a drug-induced hypersensitivity reaction., Aims: Aim was to review reports of clozapine-related reactions fulfilling the registry of severe cutaneous adverse reaction (RegiSCAR) criteria for DRESS syndrome reported as such or otherwise, to provide a descriptive overview of demographic patterns, clinical manifestations, and DRESS course and investigate associations between demographic, DRESS parameters, and clinical outcomes., Methods: This review was conducted following preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines and registered with PROSPERO (registration number CRD42020156385). We searched PubMed/Embase/PsychInfo/Cochrane for reports of clozapine-related reactions meeting RegiSCAR criteria. Associations between RegiSCAR scores and time-to-recovery with demographic/clinical variables were assessed. Demographic/clinical characteristics of patients with versus without reported DRESS were compared using non-parametrical tests., Results: We identified 26 reports of 27 patients meeting RegiSCAR criteria. Males ( n  = 19, 70.4%) and patients with schizophrenia ( n  = 18, 66.7%) were mainly affected. Twelve patients (44.4%) received clozapine-monotherapy. DRESS symptoms manifested within a month after clozapine initiation ( n  = 24, 88.9%). Lungs and liver were the most common organs involved ( n  = 12, 44.4%; n  = 11, 40.7%), with a mean time to recovery of 33.75 days. Clozapine rechallenge led to DRESS recurrence in four patients. Death rate was 7.4%. No associations were detected between RegiSCAR criteria or days to recovery with any demographic/clinical variables. No differences between patients with versus without reported DRESS were detected., Conclusions: Clozapine-related DRESS may be rare, but also underreported. Clinicians need to be aware of it even in patients under clozapine-monotherapy or without skin rash.

Schizophrenia is a chronic disorder that often requires long-term relapse-prevention treatment. This treatment is effective for most individuals, yet approximately 20-30 % of them may still relapse despite confirmed adherence. Alternatively, for about 15 % it may be safe to discontinue medications over the long term, but since there are no means to identify who those individuals will be, the recommendation is that all individuals receive long-term relapse-prevention treatment with antipsychotic maintenance. Thus, the current approach to prevent relapse in schizophrenia may be suboptimal for over one third of individuals, either by being insufficient to protect against relapse, or by unnecessarily exposing them to medication side effects. There is great need to identify biomarkers of relapse in schizophrenia to stratify treatment according to the risk and develop therapeutics targeting its pathophysiology. In order to develop a line of research that meets those needs, it is necessary to create a framework by identifying the challenges to this type of study as well as potential areas for biomarker identification and development. In this manuscript we review the literature to create such a framework., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Coordinated specialty care (CSC) has become the standard of care for first-episode psychosis (FEP). The gap between CSC best practices and the actual care delivered is unknown. This longitudinal study aimed to measure that gap by using a large Medicaid claims database and 10 quality indicators (QIs) reflecting aspects of CSC and to study the relationship between these QIs and future health care utilization., Methods: Individuals with FEP were identified in a Missouri Medicaid claims database. Participants were required to have been eligible for Medicaid benefits for at least 10 months in the year prior to and the year after their first episode of psychosis and to have had no evidence of a prior psychosis diagnosis. Descriptive statistics were generated for each of the QIs, and a stratified Cox regression was used to identify predictors of subsequent health care utilization., Results: Data were obtained for 6,246 participants, and follow-up lasted a mean of 4.24 years. Significant practice gaps were found in the use and monitoring of antipsychotic medications. Of those prescribed antipsychotic medication, 5% received prescriptions above recommended daily doses, 16% received two or more antipsychotics, and 20% were treated with olanzapine or clozapine. Among the QIs, lack of monitoring for smoking (hazard ratio [HR]=2.71, 95% confidence interval [CI]=2.47-2.97) and lack of integrated care delivery in treatment (HR=2.00, 95% CI=1.92-2.08) were most associated with psychiatric hospitalization., Conclusions: In most cases, treatment was far from meeting CSC recommendations, suggesting that implementation of CSC requires substantial modifications to delivery of care for individuals with FEP.

Objective: This systematic review and pooled, patient-level analysis of neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) case reports and series compared NMS characteristics and outcomes during long-acting injectable antipsychotic (LAI) versus oral antipsychotic (OAP) treatment., Data Sources: Two authors independently searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, CINAHL, and PsycINFO databases for articles in English from database inception until October 9, 2018., Study Selection: Case reports with author-defined NMS during ongoing antipsychotic treatment or within 1 injection interval of LAIs in adults aged 18-65 years., Data Extraction: Demographic, clinical, treatment and outcome data were independently extracted following PRISMA guidelines. NMS severity was rated using the Francis-Yacoub scale. Characteristics and outcomes of NMS were compared when occurring during LAI versus OAP treatment, adjusting for significant between-group differences., Results: Of 662 reported cases (median age = 36 years, male = 61.2%), 122 (18.4%) involved LAIs (second-generation antipsychotic [SGA] LAIs [SGA-LAIs] = 10, 1.5%), whereas 540 (81.6%) involved OAPs (SGA-OAPs = 159, 24.0%). The 2 groups did not differ in age, illness duration, comorbidities, or presence or severity of NMS symptoms (median Francis-Yacoub score: LAIs = 26 vs OAPs = 23, P = .8276). Antipsychotic formulation was not significantly associated with longer duration of hospitalization (LAIs = 5.0 weeks vs OAPs = 3.8 weeks, P = .8322), post-NMS sequelae (LAIs = 8.8% vs OAPs = 7.0%, P = .7489), or death (LAIs = 10.7% vs OAPs = 6.7%, P = .0861). When different, post hoc confounder-adjusted models were used, duration of NMS (but not hospitalization for NMS) was longer with LAIs than with OAPs (median = 2.6 vs 1.8 weeks, P = .0339), driven by FGAs rather than SGAs., Conclusions: These data, plus the fact that only 10 published NMS cases exist with SGA-LAIs, should mitigate safety concerns regarding LAIs, but results should be interpreted cautiously since they are based on case reports., (© Copyright 2020 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.)

Background: Some patients develop breakthrough psychotic symptoms on antipsychotic maintenance medication (BAMM), despite receiving therapeutic antipsychotic doses to which they previously responded., Methods: We examined the occurrence of BAMM in previously minimally treated first-episode patients with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders who were treated according to a standard protocol with a long-acting injectable antipsychotic and regularly assessed over 24 months., Results: Of 99 patients (age = 24.1 ± 6.5 years, male = 73.7%) who received treatment for ≥6 months (mean follow-up = 20.0 ± 6.5 months) and had responded well to treatment, 21 (21.2%) developed BAMM using operationally defined criteria, after a mean of 17.4 ± 6.1 months. Baseline risk factors for BAMM included lower baseline Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale positive symptoms, poorer quality of life in social relationships and higher blood - high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol. Regarding intra-treatment-factors, BAMM was independently predicted by an increase in low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol and current cannabis use. We did not find a relationship between BAMM and cumulative antipsychotic exposure or dose escalation. While symptoms of the BAMM episode were less severe than during the first episode, the post-BAMM treatment response was poorer than that for the first psychotic episode, suggesting a relationship between BAMM and emergent treatment refractoriness., Conclusions: About one in five patients with first-episode schizophrenia developed BAMM during the first two years of treatment, despite assured antipsychotic LAI treatment, indicating that this phenomenon is not restricted to the chronic stages of illness. The role of cannabis use and a possible link between BAMM and blood lipids should be further explored., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest RE has participated in speakers/advisory boards and received honoraria from Janssen, Lundbeck, Servier and Otsuka, and has received research funding from Janssen and Lundbeck. LA has no interests to declare. JMR has participated as speaker and in advisory board for Lundbeck. CUC has been a consultant and/or advisor to or has received honoraria from: Alkermes, Allergan, Angelini, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Gedeon Richter, Gerson Lehrman Group, Indivior, IntraCellular Therapies, Janssen/J&J, LB Pharma, Lundbeck, MedAvante-ProPhase, Medscape, Merck, Neurocrine, Noven, Otsuka, Pfizer, Recordati, Rovi, Servier, Sumitomo Dainippon, Sunovion, Supernus, Takeda, and Teva. He has provided expert testimony for Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen, and Otsuka. He served on a Data Safety Monitoring Board for Boehringer-Ingelheim, Lundbeck, Rovi, Supernus, and Teva. He received royalties from UpToDate and grant support from Janssen and Takeda. He is also a shareholder of LB Pharma. JMK has been a consultant and/or advisor to or has received honoraria from: Alkermes, Allergan, IntraCellular Therapies, Janssen/J&J, LB Pharma, Lundbeck, Medscape, Merck, Neurocrine, Otsuka, Pierre Fabre, Sumitomo Dainippon, Roche, Sunovion, Takeda, and Teva. He has provided expert testimony for Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen, and Otsuka. He served on a Data Safety Monitoring Board for Boehringer-Ingelheim, Lundbeck, Rovi, Supernus, and Teva. He received royalties from UpToDate and grant support from Janssen and Takeda. He is a shareholder of LB Pharma and The Vanguard Research Group., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Most individuals with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders have relapses, which increase the risk of morbidity and mortality. Because non-adherence to antipsychotic maintenance treatment could affect more than half of individuals with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders, psychosis relapse can often be confounded by unnoticed treatment interruption. Research of relapse during confirmed antipsychotic exposure has basic clinical and neurobiological implications, but data are scarce. We aimed to generate reliable estimates of incidence and predictors of relapse during assured antipsychotic treatment., Methods: We did a systematic review and individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis of clinical trials of long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) for psychosis relapse-prevention, following IPD-PRISMA guidelines. Datasets were identified by searching relevant repositories from inception to Aug 1, 2019. Each LAI group was reanalysed as a separate cohort, further identifying subcohorts of individuals with and without prospectively determined symptom remission (PSR). Summary incidence rate of relapse, incidence rate ratios (IRRs) of relapse between individuals with and without PSR, hazard ratios (HRs) of covariates on risk of relapse, and standardised mean difference (SMDs) in changes in overall functioning associated with relapse were generated by pooling results from the harmonised reanalysis of each study. This study is registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42019137439., Findings: 19 treatment cohorts consisting of 5130 individuals (2938 with PSR, 2192 without PSR), with 3959·53 observed participant-years, were meta-analysed. Pooled incidence of relapse was 22·97 per 100 participant-years (14·76 per 100 participant-years for the PSR subcohort, 31·51 per 100 participant-years for the non-PSR subcohort), with an IRR of 0·19 (95% CI 0·07 to 0·54). Relapse was associated with functional decline (overall SMD -0·76, 95% CI -1·14 to -0·37; PSR SMD -0·52, 95% CI -0·80 to -0·21; non-PSR SMD -0·72, 95% CI -1·18 to -0·26). The strongest predictor of relapse was tardive dyskinesia at treatment onset (HR 2·39, 95% CI 1·05 to 5·42)., Interpretation: Despite the established efficacy of antipsychotics in preventing relapse, these data indicate that these drugs might not prevent subsequent exacerbations for a proportion of individuals whose illness is stabilised on continuous antipsychotic treatment. Tardive dyskinesia in particular might have pathophysiological implications for relapse., Funding: Northwell Health., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS) syndrome is a severe, multiorganic, and potentially life-threatening drug-induced hypersensitivity reaction, linked to several common drugs, including antiepileptics, antibiotics, and several psychotropic drugs, including clozapine. Due to the importance of clozapine in the management of treatment-resistant schizophrenia, a systematic review and characterization of clozapine-related DRESS syndrome is long overdue., Areas Covered: This systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase, PsychINFO, and the Cochrane Library databases were independently reviewed up to 1 November 2019 for articles reporting clozapine-related DRESS syndrome cases. The RegiSCAR score system was applied to systematically characterize the clinical presentations of selected studies., Expert Opinion: Clozapine-related DRESS syndrome was reported in six patients from four articles. Five patients received polypharmacy. Skin rash and liver involvement with elevated liver enzymes were very common. No fatal cases were found. Treatment mainly included clozapine discontinuation and immunosuppression. The mismatch between incidences of DRESS with other responsible drugs, the common misdiagnosis of this syndrome, and the fact that an extensive literature search only identified six cases suggests that clozapine-related DRESS may be overlooked. It is, therefore, necessary to optimize diagnostic strategies to identify immune-related side effects of clozapine.

Background: There is uncertainty about the incidence of breakthrough psychosis in treatment adherent patients, and the role that factors, such as cumulative antipsychotic exposure, play in this phenomenon., Methods: In a nationwide cohort of individuals treated for schizophrenia-spectrum disorders in Finland between 1 January 1996 and 31 December 2015, 'Breakthrough Psychosis on Antipsychotic Maintenance Medication' (BAMM) was defined as hospitalization for psychosis despite ongoing continuous treatment with long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) or oral antipsychotics (OAPs) for ⩾8 weeks. Incidence rates, survival curves, and risk factors were presented., Results: In a cohort of 16 031 continuous LAI treatment episodes with virtually assured adherence [median duration = 441 days, interquartile range (IQR) = 155-1277], BAMM incidence was 31.5%. For 42 867 OAPs treatment episodes (median duration = 483 days, IQR = 167-1491), for whom adherence was modeled by the PRE2DUP method, BAMM incidence was 31.1%. Factors related to illness instability at treatment onset were associated with BAMM, although median time to BAMM was 291 days (IQR = 121-876) for LAIs and 344 days (IQR = 142-989) for OAPs, and 27.4% (N = 1386) of the BAMM events in the LAI, and 32.9% (N = 4378) in the OAP group occurred despite >1 year since last hospitalization at treatment onset. Cumulative antipsychotic exposure was not a consistent risk factor., Conclusion: BAMM was relatively common even when adherence was confirmed with LAIs. Illness instability at treatment onset accounted for most cases, but relapse after years of continuous treatment was still prevalent. There was insufficient evidence to support causality between cumulative antipsychotic exposure and BAMM. Future research needs to address the role of symptom severity and neurobiology in BAMM.

Competing Interests: Competing interests: JMR has been an advisor for Lundbeck. CUC has been a consultant and/or advisor to or has received honoraria from Alkermes, Allergan, Angelini, Gerson Lehrman Group, IntraCellular Therapies, Janssen/J&J, LB Pharma, Lundbeck, Medavante, Medscape, Merck, Neurocrine, Otsuka, Pfizer, ROVI, Servier, Sunovion, Takeda and Teva. He has provided expert testimony for Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen and Otsuka. He served on a Data Safety Monitoring Board for Lundbeck, ROVI and Teva. He received royalties from UpToDate and grant support from Janssen and Takeda. He is also a shareholder of LB Pharma.

Importance: Limited treatment responses in schizophrenia prompted the testing of combining an antipsychotic drug treatment with a second psychotropic medication. A comprehensive evaluation of the efficacy of multiple medication combinations is missing., Objective: To summarize and compare the meta-analytically determined efficacy of pharmacologic combination strategies of antipsychotic drugs in adults with schizophrenia., Data Sources: Systematic search of PubMed and PsycInfo until May 13, 2016., Study Selection: Meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials comparing the efficacy of antipsychotic drugs combined with other antipsychotic or nonantipsychotic medications vs placebos or antipsychotic monotherapy among adults with schizophrenia., Data Extraction and Synthesis: Independent reviewers extracted the data and assessed the quality of the methods of the included meta-analyses using A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR), adding 6 new items to rate their quality. Effect sizes, expressed as standardized mean difference /Hedges g or risk ratio, were compared separately for combinations with any antipsychotic drug and for combinations with clozapine., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was total symptom reduction. Secondary outcomes included positive and negative symptoms, treatment recommendations by authors, study-defined inefficacies, cognitive and depressive symptoms, discontinuation of treatment because of any cause, and inefficacies or intolerabilities., Results: Of 3397 publications, 29 meta-analyses testing 42 combination strategies in 381 individual trials and among 19 833 participants were included. For total symptom reductions, 32 strategies that augmented any antipsychotic drug and 5 strategies that augmented clozapine were examined. Fourteen combination treatments outperformed controls (standard mean difference/Hedges g, -1.27 [95% CI, -2.35 to -0.19] to -0.23 [95% CI, -0.44 to -0.02]; P = .05). No combination strategies with clozapine outperformed controls. The quality of the methods of the meta-analyses was generally high (mean score, 9 of a maximum score of 11) but the quality of the meta-analyzed studies was low (mean score, 2.8 of a maximum score of 8). Treatment recommendations correlated with the effect size (correlation coefficient, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.35-0.10; P < .001), yet effect sizes were inversely correlated with study quality (correlation coefficient, -0.06; 95% CI, 0.01 to -0.12; P = .02)., Conclusions and Relevance: Meta-analyses of 21 interventions fully or partially recommended their use, with recommendations being positively correlated with the effect sizes of the pooled intervention. However, the effect sizes were inversely correlated with meta-analyzed study quality, reducing confidence in these recommendations. Higher-quality trials and patient-based meta-analyses are needed to determine whether subpopulations might benefit from combination treatment, as no single strategy can be recommended for patients with schizophrenia based on the current meta-analytic literature.

Antipsychotic drugs are the cornerstone in the management of psychotic disorders, but most patients fail to have a 'good' response in short-term trials. Therefore, alternative strategies including dose escalation, switching [...]

There is an ongoing debate about the potential risks and benefits of long-term antipsychotic treatment in schizophrenia. The data for and against the chronic use of these medicines is mostly indirect, either from observational studies potentially exposed to reverse causation bias or randomized controlled studies that do not cover beyond 2–3 years. We propose that perseverating on the question of what positive or negative outcomes are causally associated with chronic antipsychotic treatment may not lead to better answers than the limited ones that we have, given the limited feasibility of more conclusive studies. Rather, we argue that addressing the research question of the risks and benefits of antipsychotic discontinuation from a perspective of personalized medicine, can be more productive and meaningful to people living with schizophrenia. To this end, research that can quantify the risk of relapse after treatment continuation for a given individual should be prioritized. We make the case that clinically feasible neuroimaging biomarkers have demonstrated promise in related paradigms, and that could be offering a way past this long debate on the risks and benefits of chronic antipsychotic use. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]