Search

Introduction: People with mental retardation often display aggressive behavior against themselves or others making care within institutions or foster families difficult. Due to a lack of viable alternatives, antipsychotics of the first and second generations are often used for long-term treatment despite the fact that only data about short-term treatment exist., Methods: A short-time withdrawal trial of 12 weeks (n = 39) was extended at open label to 2 years. 31 patients received zuclopenthixol after the end of the withdrawal and were examined using the same instruments as in the withdrawal period (DAS, MOAS, CGI)., Results: Patients still treated with zuclopenthixol after 2 years (n = 21) benefitted, compared to the drop-outs (n = 10). Analyses of time trends revealed an early effect of zuclopenthixol which could not be enhanced afterwards., Discussion: Zuclopenthixol proved to be safe and effective to keep a lower rate of aggressive behavior in adults with mental retardation also over a longer period of time., (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Schizophrenia is one of the most expensive illnesses. Antipsychotics are an essential component of the acute and preventative treatment of this illness, and long-term treatment is necessary to decrease the risk of psychotic relapse. The efficacy and tolerability of flupentixol was evaluated in a post-marketing surveillance study (PMS) in schizophrenic patients receiving long-term treatment in routine clinical practice. Psychiatrists in office practice treated patients for approximately 10 weeks, with a subsequent follow-up period of up to 18 months. We here report on the follow-up period in 128 patients. The benefit for schizophrenic patients increased with the treatment duration of flupentixol as documented by the Clinical Global Impression (CGI). Subjective quality of life improved during the first study period, and this remained stable in the follow-up period. No increase in body weight was observed during the study. The relapse rate was much lower than in other studies. Anticholinergic medication was necessary for 22.7% of the patients at any time. More than 70% of the psychiatrists involved evaluated the treatment as very good or good. The results of this study suggest that flupentixol is a potent and safe antipsychotic for the long-term treatment of schizophrenia in routine clinical practice.

Introduction: Earlier studies showed risperidone to be effective in the treatment of aggression and self-injurious behaviour in adults with mental retardation but also having adverse side effects. This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of zuclopenthixol withdrawal., Methods: After open treatment with zuclopenthixol (n=49) responders were randomly assigned to continue (n=19) or discontinue (n=20) zuclopenthixol treatment during a 12-week double-blind, placebo-controlled period. Effects were measured using the Disability Assessment Schedule (DAS), improvement on the Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI-I), and the Nurse's Observation Scale for Inpatient Evaluation (NOSIE)., Results: Ten patients (20%) discontinued the study due to insufficient therapeutic effect or adverse events in the open period., Efficacy: The superiority of zuclopenthixol over placebo among all randomized patients was supported not only by primary efficacy measure but also by the comparisons of mean scores of all secondary efficacy measures tested in a step-down-procedure (DAS, p<0.001; CGI-I, p<0.002, NOSIE, p<0.005)., Safety: In both groups, one patient discontinued (5%) for adverse events. Adverse events were generally mild or moderate in severity., Discussion: Zuclopenthixol proved to be safe and effective to keep a low rate of aggressive behaviour in adults with mental retardation.

We investigated the effects of zuclopenthixol on aggressive behaviour in patients with intellectual disabilities by randomly withdrawing it after a 6-week period of open treatment. Of the 49 patients responding to the treatment, 39 took part in a randomised withdrawal trial. The placebo subgroup (n=20) showed more aggressive behaviour as indicated by outcomes observed by external raters on the Modified Overt Aggression Scale than did the continuing subgroup (n=19). The results indicate that discontinuation of zuclopenthixolin this population leads to an increase in aggressive behaviour.

Rationale: Flupentixol (FLX) has been used as a neuroleptic for nearly 4 decades. In vitro data show comparable affinity to dopamine D(2), D(1) and 5-HT(2A) receptors and recently, FLX showed to be not inferior to risperidone in schizophrenic patients with predominant negative symptomatology, which was implicated with flupentixol's interaction with 5-HT(2A) and/or D(1) receptors., Objectives: To assess in vivo receptor occupancy (RO) in patients clinically treated with FLX (n = 13, 5.7 +/- 1.4 mg/day) in comparison with risperidone (RIS, n = 11, 3.6 +/- 1.3 mg/day) and haloperidol (HAL, n = 11, 8.5 +/- 5.5 mg/day)., Materials and Methods: Each patient underwent two PET scans with 3-N-[(11)C]methylspiperone (target: frontal 5-HT(2A)), [(11)C]SCH23390 (striatal D(1)) or [(11)C]raclopride (striatal D(2)). RO was calculated as the percentage reduction of specific binding in comparison with healthy controls., Results: D(2)-RO under FLX was between 50% and 70%, indicating an ED(50) of about 0.7 ng/ml serum. 5-HT(2A) and D(1)-RO was 20 +/- 10% and 20 +/- 5% (mean, SEM). Under HAL, D(1)-RO was 14 +/- 6% and under RIS not significantly different from zero., Conclusions: We were able to demonstrate a moderate 5-HT(2A) and D(1) occupancy under clinically relevant doses of flupentixol, albeit lower than expected from in vitro data and clearly below saturation. Therefore, if flupentixol's efficacy on negative symptoms is based on its interaction with 5-HT(2A) and/or D(1) receptors, it should be highly dependent on serum concentration and thus on dosage and metabolism. However, these data suggest that mechanisms other than D(1) or 5-HT(2A) antagonism may contribute to flupentixol's efficacy on negative symptoms.

The efficacy of flupentixol and risperidone were compared in a randomized double-blind study in 153 chronic schizophrenic patients. Flupentixol showed to be not inferior to risperidone concerning schizophrenic negative symptoms at week 8, 16 and 24. Positive symptoms and general psychopathology improved comparably, too. There was a trend in favor of flupentixol concerning the improvement of depressive symptoms and a trend in favor of risperidone concerning the improvement of preexisting parkinsonian symptoms. The study data justify to regard flupentixol as a "partial atypical" antipsychotic.

Substance use, especially alcoholism, has been recognized as a significant problem in schizophrenic patients, though only a few studies on the effects of pharmacotherapy in these patients have been conducted so far. The thioxanthene neuroleptic flupenthixol, which can be given intramuscularly (i.m.) for improving compliance, has been studied as a possible anti-craving drug both in animal models of alcoholism and some clinical studies. Pilot studies suggest that comorbid schizophrenics with substance use may benefit from treatment with flupenthixol. Efficacy of flupenthixol (10-60 mg i.m.) in reducing alcohol consumption of dual diagnosis patients was studied in an open 6-month clinical trial in 27 schizophrenics with comorbid alcoholism. Twenty-one patients entered the intention-to-treat analysis. Fourteen subjects were completers, 13 dropped out. Six patients completely abstained from alcohol during treatment. Alcohol consumption was significantly reduced compared to baseline (4 weeks before treatment as measured by timeline follow-back interview). In general, while patients showed a marked improvement concerning alcohol consumption, only a slight improvement in psychopathology was recorded. Overall tolerability was good. These data indicate a probable beneficial effect of flupenthixol in schizophrenic patients with comorbid alcoholism. Although the efficacy of flupenthixol as an anti-craving drug in dual diagnosis patients has to be explored in further studies, the drug may be considered a promising medication for these patients., (Copyright 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel)

Objective: The primary aim of this paper was to compare the effects of flupenthixol and risperidone on subjective quality of life and attitude towards medication in chronic schizophrenic patients with mainly negative symptoms. In a spectrum ranging from its typical end "haloperidol" to its atypical end "clozapine", flupenthixol has typical and atypical characteristics., Methods: The effects of flupenthixol versus risperidone were investigated in a multicenter, double-blind trial, whereas subjective quality of life was assessed by means of the EuroQuol-Visual Analogue Scale and the patient satisfaction questionnaire. The attitude towards medication was assessed by means of the Drug Attitude Inventory-30 (DAI-30)., Results: Mean daily dose of study medication was 6.6 (SD 2.9) mg/day flupenthixol and 3.6 (SD 1.2) mg/day risperidone. Both groups showed a significant improvement regarding subjective quality of life and positive attitude towards medication. Especially the categories "control of their thoughts", concentration and "feeling better in general" ameliorated in both groups. In the flupenthixol group, the "ability to cope with stress", "feel more relaxed" and the "ability to achieve something" improved significantly more than in the risperidone group., Conclusions: (1) The spectrum of schizophrenia can be treated effectively with different neuroleptic treatments. (2) Flupenthixol especially improves the ability to cope with stress, the ability to achieve something and feeling more relaxed. (3) Subjective quality of life significantly increased with no difference between the groups., (Copyright 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel)

62 chronic schizophrenics, who after a psychotic exacerbation were stabilized again, were randomized on 3 different maintenance dosages of flupentixol-decanoate and observed for 12 months. 15 (24.2%) patients had a relapse independently of the dose. 34 of the 47 patients without relapse had complete documentations of the follow-up. After 3 to 6 months there was an obvious and constant clinical improvement as assessed by various test inventories. The BPRS-scores for psychopathology, negative and positive symptoms improved significantly between 14 to 18%. There was also significant reduction of negative symptoms assessed by SANS (22%) as well in the severity of illness (CGI) and an amelioration of psychosocial functioning (GAS, Strauss-Carpenter). At the end of trial 26.4% of the patients had mild involuntary movements (AIMS), 23.5% were on antiparkinson-medication. It is concluded that there could be an indication for flupentixol-decanoate in the long term maintenance therapy especially of chronic schizophrenics with negative symptoms and problems of compliance under oral medication.

The trial was a double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison with a discontinuation design. 49 mentally retarded patients with aggressive behaviour were treated with zuclopenthixol at a dose of 2-20 mg/d. At each visit the clinical effect was evaluated. Correlations between dose, serum concentration, and efficacy measures were calculated. The mean dose was 10.0 mg/day ( ± 5.17); the mean serum concentration 4.19 ng/ mL ( ± 3.16). Associations of dosage, serum concentration and clinical efficiency did not result in coherent patterns. Correlations with clinical efficiency measures appeared to be contradictory for dosage and serum concentrations, respectively. As no consistent associations between dosage, serum concentration, and clinical efficiency measures were found, different hypotheses explaining the results are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: People with mental retardation often display aggressive behavior against themselves or others making care within institutions or foster families difficult. Due to a lack of viable alternatives, antipsychotics of the first and second generations are often used for long-term treatment despite the fact that only data about short-term treatment exist. Methods: A short-time withdrawal trial of 12 weeks (n = 39) was extended at open label to 2 years. 31 patients received zuclopenthixol after the end of the withdrawal and were examined using the same instruments as in the withdrawal period (DAS, MOAS, CGI). Results: Patients still treated with zuclopenthixol after 2 years (n = 21) benefitted, compared to the drop-outs (n = 10). Analyses of time trends revealed an early effect of zuclopenthixol which could not be enhanced afterwards. Discussion: Zuclopenthixol proved to be safe and effective to keep a lower rate of aggressive behavior in adults with mental retardation also over a longer period of time. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Flupentixol (FLX) has been used as a neuroleptic for nearly 4 decades. In vitro data show comparable affinity to dopamine D2, D1 and 5-HT2A receptors and recently, FLX showed to be not inferior to risperidone in schizophrenic patients with predominant negative symptomatology, which was implicated with flupentixol’s interaction with 5-HT2A and/or D1 receptors. To assess in vivo receptor occupancy (RO) in patients clinically treated with FLX ( n = 13, 5.7 ± 1.4 mg/day) in comparison with risperidone (RIS, n = 11, 3.6 ± 1.3 mg/day) and haloperidol (HAL, n = 11, 8.5 ± 5.5 mg/day). Each patient underwent two PET scans with 3- N-[11C]methylspiperone (target: frontal 5-HT2A), [11C]SCH23390 (striatal D1) or [11C]raclopride (striatal D2). RO was calculated as the percentage reduction of specific binding in comparison with healthy controls. D2-RO under FLX was between 50% and 70%, indicating an ED50 of about 0.7 ng/ml serum. 5-HT2A and D1-RO was 20 ± 10% and 20 ± 5% (mean, SEM). Under HAL, D1-RO was 14 ± 6% and under RIS not significantly different from zero. We were able to demonstrate a moderate 5-HT2A and D1 occupancy under clinically relevant doses of flupentixol, albeit lower than expected from in vitro data and clearly below saturation. Therefore, if flupentixol’s efficacy on negative symptoms is based on its interaction with 5-HT2A and/or D1 receptors, it should be highly dependent on serum concentration and thus on dosage and metabolism. However, these data suggest that mechanisms other than D1 or 5-HT2A antagonism may contribute to flupentixol’s efficacy on negative symptoms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]