Search

Background: Prospective data about the risks of thrombotic and severe haemorrhagic complications during pregnancy and post partum are unavailable for women with antiphospholipid syndrome. We aimed to assess thrombotic and haemorrhagic events in a prospective cohort of pregnant women with antiphospholipid syndrome., Methods: This multicentre, prospective, observational study was done at 76 centres in France. To be eligible for this study, women had to have diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome; have conceived before April 17, 2020; have an ongoing pregnancy that had reached 12 weeks of gestation; and be included in the study before 18 weeks of gestation. Exclusion criteria were active systemic lupus erythematosus nephropathy, or a multifetal pregnancy. Severe haemorrhage was defined as the need for red blood cell transfusion or maternal intensive care unit admission because of bleeding or invasive procedures, defined as interventional radiology or surgery, to control bleeding. The GR2 study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02450396., Findings: Between May 26, 2014, and April 17, 2020, 168 pregnancies in 27 centres met the inclusion criteria for the study. 89 (53%) of 168 women had a history of thrombosis. The median term at inclusion was 8 weeks gestation. 16 (10%) of 168 women (95%CI 5-15) had a thrombotic (six [4%] women; 95% CI 1-8) or severe haemorrhagic event (12 [7%] women; 95% CI 4-12). There were no deaths during the study. The main risk factors for thrombotic events were lupus anticoagulant positivity at inclusion (six [100%] of six women with thrombosis vs 78 [51%] of 152 of those with no thrombosis; p=0·030) and placental insufficiency (four [67%] of six women vs 28 [17%] of 162 women; p=0·013). The main risk factors for severe haemorrhagic events were pre-existing maternal hypertension (four [33%] of 12 women vs 11 [7%] of 156 women; p=0·014), lupus anticoagulant positivity at inclusion (12 [100%] of 12 women vs 72 [49%] of 146 women; p<0·0001) and during antiphospholipid history (12 [100%] of 12 women vs 104 [67%] of 156 women; p=0·019), triple antiphospholipid antibody positivity (eight [67%] of 12 women vs 36 [24%] of 147 women; p=0·0040), placental insufficiency (five [42%] of 12 women vs 27 [17%] of 156 women; p=0·038), and preterm delivery at 34 weeks or earlier (five [45%] of 11 women vs 12 [8%] of 145 women; p=0·0030)., Interpretation: Despite treatment adhering to international recommendations, a proportion of women with antiphospholipid syndrome developed a thrombotic or severe haemorrhagic complication related to pregnancy, most frequently in the post-partum period. Lupus anticoagulant and placental insufficiency were risk factors for these life-threatening complications. These complications are difficult to prevent, but knowledge of the antenatal characteristics associated with them should increase awareness and help physicians manage these high-risk pregnancies., Funding: Lupus France, association des Sclérodermiques de France, association Gougerot Sjögren, Association Francophone contre la Polychondrite chronique atrophiante, AFM-Telethon, the French Society of Internal Medicine and Rheumatology, Cochin Hospital, the French Health Ministry, FOREUM, the Association Prix Veronique Roualet, and UCB., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests NC-C has received an unrestricted research grant from UCB to her institution. NB has received honoraria for presentations or speaker bureaus from GSK, Astra Zeneca, and Leo, and was supported by Boehringer Ingelheim for attending meetings or travel. CL has received honoraria for lectures about interstitial pneumopathies from Boehringer Ingelheim. VLG has received honoraria for presentations or speaker bureaus from Bristol Myers Squibb and consulting fees from Novartis, and was supported by AstraZeneca-MedImmune for attending meetings and travel. NL has received consulting fees from Amgen. AMo has received an unrestricted research grant from Pfizer to her institution, consulting fees from Janssen and Gilead, and honoraria for presentations or speaker bureaus from Abbvie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Biogen, Pfizer, UCB, and Lilly, was supported by Abbvie, Janssen, BMS, and Pfizer for attending meetings or travel, and is an advisory board member for Janssen and UCB. LM received unrestricted research grants from LFB Biotechnologies, CSL Behring, and Roche to her institution and honoraria for presentations or speaker bureaus from Boehringer Ingelheim and CSL Behring, and was supported by LFB Biotechnologies and Abbvie for attending meetings or travel. NS has received honoraria for presentations from CSL Behring and Eusapharma and from Takeda for participation on an advisory board. LS reports consulting fees from Ferring Pharmaceuticals and payment or honoraria for lectures from Ferring Pharmaceuticals. GU reports research support from Philippe Foundation for their postdoctoral research and has received honoraria for lectures from Sanofi. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective To study the outcome of patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) after oral anticoagulant treatment cessation. Methods We performed a retrospective study of patients with APS experiencing cessation of oral anticoagulant and enrolled in a French multicentre observational cohort between January 2014 and January 2016. The main outcome was the occurrence of recurrent thrombotic event after oral anticoagulation cessation. Results Forty four APS patients interrupted oral anticoagulation. The median age was 43 (27-56) years. The median duration of anticoagulation was 21 (9-118) months. Main causes of oral anticoagulant treatment cessation were switch from vitamin K antagonists to aspirin in 15 patients, prolonged disappearance of antiphospholipid antibodies in ten, bleeding complications in nine and a poor therapeutic adherence in six. Eleven (25%) patients developed a recurrent thrombotic event after oral anticoagulation cessation, including three catastrophic APS and one death due to lower limb ischemia. Antihypertensive treatment required at time of oral anticoagulants cessation seems to be an important factor associated with recurrent thrombosis after oral anticoagulant cessation (15.2% in patients with no relapse versus 45.5% in patients with recurrent thrombosis, p = 0.038). Oral anticoagulant treatment was re-started in 18 (40.9%) patients. Conclusion The risk of a new thrombotic event in APS patients who stopped their anticoagulation is high, even in those who showed a long lasting disappearance of antiphospholipid antibodies. Except for the presence of treated hypertension, this study did not find a particular clinical or biological phenotype for APS patients who relapsed after anticoagulation cessation. Any stopping of anticoagulant in such patients should be done with caution.